Cato's tribuneship was a military tribuneship (tribunus militum).]

[Footnote 672: He was a native of Tarsus in Cilicia, and at the time

of Cato's visit to him he had the care of the library at Pergamus.

Strabo (p. 674, ed. Casaub.) says that he died in Cato's house at

Rome.]

[Footnote 673: Ænus was a small town at the mouth of the river Hebrus,

now the Maritza. The island of Thasos, now Thaso, contains marble. The

monument was a costly memorial, if the Attic talent was meant, which

we must presume. Talents of silver are of course intended.]

[Footnote 674: The allusion is to the Anticato of Cæsar (Life of

Cæsar, c. 54). How the matter really was, no one can tell; but such a

story is not likely to be a pure invention.]

[Footnote 675: He is mentioned as being an old man in B.C. 54 (Life of

Crassus c. 17). Deiotarus was a friend of the Romans in their Asiatic

wars against Mithridates, and the senate conferred on him the title of

king. He knew what kind of people he had to deal with when he showed

such attention to Cato's train (c. 15). His history is closely

connected with that of Cæsar, and of Cicero, who made a speech in his

defence before Cæsar at Rome B.C. 45 (Pro Rege Deiotaro).]

[Footnote 676: The story about Demetrius, the contemptible favourite

of Pompeius, is told by Plutarch in his Life of Pompeius, c. 40.

Plutarch makes the visit to Asia precede Cato's quæstorship, upon

which see the remarks of Drumann, _Geschichte Roms_, v. 157. The

narration of Plutarch is evidently confused as will appear from the

fourteenth and fifteenth chapters.]

[Footnote 677: Either C. Scribonius Curio who was consul B.C. 76, or

his son the tribune, an adherent of Cæsar; but probably the father is

meant.]

[Footnote 678: See the Life of Marius, c. 17.]

[Footnote 679: Cato's quæstorship was in the year B.C. 65.]

[Footnote 680: Lutatius Catulus, censor B.C. 65, was the son of

Catulus who with Marius defeated the Cimbri at Vercellæ B.C. 101.

(Life of Marius, c. 25.)]

[Footnote 681: This pasange, which has been supposed by some

translators to mean that Catulus ran the risk of being degraded from

his office, is correctly translated and explained by Kaltwasser. Cato

hinted that the officers of the Court would turn Catulus out, if he

continued to act as he did. Plutarch has told the same story in his

treatise [Greek: peri dusopias] περὶ δυσοπίας, _De Vitioso Pudore_ c.

13, to which Kaltwasser refers.]

[Footnote 682: He may be C. Claudius Marcellus afterwards consul B.C.

50, or his cousin of the same name who was consul B.C. 49.]

[Footnote 683: The parentage of Terentia, Cicero's wife, is unknown.

The mother of Terentia must have married a Fabius, by whom she had

this Fabia, the half sister of Terentia. Fabia was a woman of rank.

Though a vestal virgin, she did not escape scandal, for she was tried

B.C. 73 for sexual intercourse with Catilina: Fabia was acquitted

(Drumann, _Geschichte Roms_, v. 392).

There is a mistake in the text: "charges" (p. 25) is a misprint, and

should be "changes;" in place of "Cicero's wide, he was in great

danger, but he involved Clodius," it should be "Cicero's wife, and she

was in great danger, he involved Clodius."

Therefore in place of "he was," line 10 from bottom, read "and she

was;" and in the same line omit "but." In line 13 from the bottom read

"changes" for "charges."]

[Footnote 684: Probably the name is corrupted. The expression is

attributed to Cato, in the Life of Lucullus, c. 40.]

[Footnote 685: Q. Metellus Nepos was serving under Pompeius in Asia in

B.C. 64. He came to Rome in B.C. 63 to be a candidate for the

tribuneship.]

[Footnote 686: D. Junius Silanus, who was consul with Licinius Murena,

B.C. 62, was now the husbaud of Servilia, who had been the wife of D.

Junius Brutus.]

[Footnote 687: He was the son of L. Licinius Murena, who served under

Sulla in Greece. The son served under his father in B.C. 83 against

Mithridates. After the consular election in B.C. 63 he was prosecuted

for bribery (ambitus). Cicero's speech in defence of Murena is

extant.]

[Footnote 688: The affair of Catiline is spoken of in the Life of

Cæsar, c. 17, and in the Life of Cicero, c. 10, &c.]

[Footnote 689: This Servilia was now the wife of Silanus the consul.

Lucullus the husband of the other Servilia had his triumph in the year

of Cicero's consulship B.C. 63 (Life of Lucullus, c. 37). He was

probably the husband of Servilia at this time.]

[Footnote 690: Short-hand writers were called by the Romans "actuarii"

and "notarii," of which last word Plutarch's word ([Greek:

sêmeiographoi] σημειόγραφοι) is a translation. It is not likely that

short-hand writing was invented for the occasion, as Plutarch says.

Under the empire short-hand writers are often mentioned.]

[Footnote 691: L. Marcius Philippus, consul in B.C. 56 with Cn.

Cornelius Lentulus.]

[Footnote 692: L. Thrasea Pætus, a Latin writer, a native of Padua,

who was put to death by Nero (Tacitus, _Annal._ xvi. 34, 25). His

authority for the Life of Cato was, as it appears, Munatius Rufus, who

accompanied Cato to Cyprus (c. 37).]

[Footnote 693: Quintus Hortensius was consul B.C. 69, a distinguished

orator and a man of refined and luxurious habits. Bibulus is M.

Calpurnius Bibulus, the colleague of Cæsar in his consulship B.C. 59.

He had three sons by Porcia, Cato's daughter by Atilia.

This transfer of Marcia is oddly told by Plutarch. It was not a mere

case of lending the woman for the purpose of procreation, for the

child of Hortensius could not be his legal child, unless Marcia became

his legal wife. Cato must accordingly have divorced his wife, which

was done at Rome without any trouble. The only thing then that is

peculiar in the affair is, that Cato did not divorce his wife because

he was dissatisfied with her on good grounds, nor for such grounds as

Cicero divorced his wife, but for the reason mentioned in the text.

Marcia continued to be the wife of Hortensius till his death. The

marriage with Hortensius probably took place about B.C. 56.

This affair has caused the critics much difficulty. But as we may

assume that Hortensius wished to have a child that would be his own,

which is in fact Plutarch's statement, and one that would be in his

paternal power, he must have married Marcia, and Cato must have

divorced her in proper form. The fact of Philippus giving his daughter

away shows that she was then at his disposal. Cato married her again,

and his conduct proved that he trusted her. The notion of Cato lending

his wife would have been as inconsistent with legal principle and

morality in Rome as such a transaction would be in England.]

[Footnote 694: Compare the Life of Cæsar, c. 8.]

[Footnote 695: Pompeius was now in Asia. See the Life of Pompeius, c.

42, 43.]

[Footnote 696: Castor and Pollux. See the Life of Tiberius Gracchus,

c. 2. The temple was on the south side of the Forum Romanum. The steps

are those which led to the Rostra.]

[Footnote 697: This is the translation of the reading [Greek:

oikothen] οίκοθεν, which is probably incorrect. Solanus proposes

[Greek: autothen] αὐτόθεν, and Kaltwasser proposes [Greek: apothen]

ἀπόθεν, "from a distance," which he has adopted in his version, "und

liess die bewaffneten, die _von fern_ standen, mit furchbarem Geschre*

anrücken."]

[Footnote 698: Lucullus returned B.C. 66. He triumphed B.C. 63. See

the Life of Lucullus, c. 37. Plutarch has here confused the order of

events. Kaltwasser translates this passage as if Lucullus had returned

to Rome after Metellus left it in B.C. 62.]

[Footnote 699: He returned B.C. 62. The consuls who were elected for

the year B.C. 61, were M. Pupius Piso, who had been a legatus of

Pompeius in Asia, and M. Valerius Messalla. See the Life of Pompeius,

c. 44.]

[Footnote 700: Probably Munatius Rufus, who is mentioned again in c.

36. Drumann (_Porcii_, p. 162) says it was Munatius Plancus.]

[Footnote 701: This was in B.C. 61, at the election of the consuls L.

Afranius and Q. Cæcilius Metellus Celer, the consuls of B.C. 60. See

the Life of Pompeius, c. 44.]

[Footnote 702: Cæsar returned B.C. 60, and was consul B.C. 59. See the

Life of Cæsar, c. 13, 14, for the events alluded to in this 31st

chapter; and the Life of Pompeius, c. 47.]

[Footnote 703: See the Life of Cæsar, c. 14.]

[Footnote 704: Numidicus. The story is told in the Life of Marius, c.

29. The matters referred to in this and the following chapter are told

circumstantially by Dion Cassius (38, c. 1-7). See Life of Cæsar, c.

14.]

[Footnote 705: L. Calpurnius Piso, the father of Calpurnia the wife of

Cæsar, and Aulus Gabinius were consuls B.C. 58. Aulus Gabinius, when

Tribunus Plebis B.C. 67, proposed the law which gave Pompeius the

command against the pirates. The meaning of the obscure allusion at

the end of the chapter, which is literally rendered, may be collected

from the context; and still more plainly from the abuse which Cicero

heaps on Gabinius for his dissolute life after he had been banished in

the consulship of Gabinius (Drumann, _Gabinii_, p. 60).]

[Footnote 706: This Ptolemæus, the brother of Ptolemæus Auletes, King

of Egypt, was now in possession of Cyprus, and the mission of Cato,

which could not be to his taste, was to take possession of the island

for the Romans. When Clodius had been made prisoner by the pirates

nine years before, Ptolemæus was asked to contribute to his ransom but

he only sent two talents, for which ill-timed saving he was mulcted in

his whole kingdom by this unprincipled tribune (Drumann, _Claudii_, p.

263).]

[Footnote 707: He is called Caninius in the Life of Brutus, c. 3.]

[Footnote 708: The feeble king had not spirit to attempt a resistance,

which indeed would have been useless. He put an end to himself by

poison (c. 36), and the Romans took the island. A more unjustifiable

act of aggression than the occupation of Cyprus, hardly occurs even in

the history of Rome.]

[Footnote 709: The priesthood of such temples as Paphos was a valuable

thing. These temples had lands and slaves.]

[Footnote 710: This was Auletes, the father of Cleopatra. He was

restored to his kingdom by A. Gabinius B.C. 55, while he was governor

of Syria.]

[Footnote 711: This is the meaning of the passage. The interview was

ludicrous enough, but Dacier makes it still more so, by seating Cato

on a close-stool; and Kind and Schirach, two German translators, make

him receive the king in the same way (Kaltwasser's note).]

[Footnote 712: This was M. Junius Brutus, afterwards Cæsar's friend

and assassin. Cato could not have found a better man for his purpose;

at least for laying his hands on all that came in his way. Brutus took

the opportunity of helping himself to some of the plunder in his

uncle's absence. At a later time he had large sums out at interest in

Cyprus and partly in other persons' names. He was a merciless usurer.

(Cicero, _Ad Attic._, v. 18 and 21; vi. 21; and the Life of Cicero, c.

36, notes.)]

[Footnote 713: Plutarch explains in a general way what is meant. The

Roman word "pignus," which Plutarch translates by [Greek: enechyra]

ἐνέχυρα, means a thing pawned and delivered as a security to the

pawnee. To take pledges, "pignora capere," was to seize something that

belonged to a man in order to compel the discharge of a duty. It was

like a distress for a service. Instances occur in Livy (3. c. 38, 37.

c. 51; Cicero, _De Oratore_, 3. c. 1).]

[Footnote 714: The Greek nominative would be Barcas. The name does not

appear to be Roman and is probably corrupted. Bursa is a Roman name.

See c. 48.]

[Footnote 715: There is no suspicion that Cato got anything for

himself. He was above that. He honestly discharged his dishonest

mission.]

[Footnote 716: This was a port of Corinth on the east side of the

Isthmus.]

[Footnote 717: The amazement of the people at the quantity of the

plunder, and the thanks of the Senate for the faithful discharge of

their order to pillage, might seem regular enough if it had been booty

gotten in war. But the robbery was not gilded with this false show. It

was pure, simple robbery without the accessories of war.]

[Footnote 718: This means a prætorship before the age at which a man

could regularly hold the office. Cato returned from Cyprus in B.C. 56.

He was now thirty-eight years of age, for he died B.C. 46, when he was

forty-eight.]

[Footnote 719: The order of the words in the original makes the

meaning appear somewhat ambiguous. The passage might be translated, as

it is by Dacier, "for the colleague of Philippus paid no less respect

to Cato on account of his merit, than Philippus did on account of his

relationship."]

[Footnote 720: Cicero returned from exile B.C. 57, in the month of

September of the unreformed calendar.]

[Footnote 721: This was the meeting at Luca in B.C. 56. See the Life

of Pompeius, c. 51; and the Life of Cæsar, c. 21.]

[Footnote 722: This was the second consulship of each, and was in B.C.

55. Cato lost the prætorship, and Vatinius was elected instead of him

(Dion Cassius (39, c. 32).]

[Footnote 723: As to Caius Trebonius, see the Life of Pompeius, c.

52.]

[Footnote 724: One would suppose that a less time would have been more

than enough, though not for Cato. Dion Cassius (39. c. 31) says that

Favonius spoke for an hour before Cato did, and took up all the time

in complaining of the shortness of his allowance. It would be a fair

inference that he had little to say against the measure itself.]

[Footnote 725: Dion Cassius (39. c. 35) tells us more particularly how

it happened that P. Aquilius Gallus was in the senate house. Gallus

was afraid that he should be excluded from the Forum the next day, and

accordingly he passed the night in the senate house, both for safety's

sake and to be ready on the spot in the morning. But Trebonius, who

found it out, kept him shut up for that night and the greater part of

the following day.]

[Footnote 726: Cato was prætor in B.C. 54. It does not appear that he

ever was prætor before, and it is not therefore clear what is meant by

the "extraordinary prætorship" (c. 39). In place of the word "Rostra,"

in the fifth line of this chapter, read "tribunal." Plutarch uses the

same word ([Greek: bêma] βῆμα) for both, which circumstance is

calculated occasionally to cause a translator to make a slip, even

when he knows better. The "tribunal" was the seat of the prætor, when

he was doing justice. But lower down (line 8 from the bottom) Rostra

is the proper translation of Plutarch's word ([Greek: epilabesthai tôn

embolon] ἐπιλαβέσθαι τῶν ἐμβόλον) and it was the place from which Cato

spoke, after he had got up. In c. 43, when Cato gets up to speak,

Plutarch makes him mount the Bema ([Greek: bêma] βῆμα), by which he

means the place when the orators stood at the Rostra. The Rostra were

the beaks of the Antiate galleys, with which, it is said, this place

was ornamented at the close of the Latin war (Livy, 8, c. 14).]

[Footnote 727: The reason according to Plutarch why people envy the

man who has a high reputation for integrity, is because of the power

and credit which it gives. Whatever then gives power and credit should

be also an object of envy, as wealth; and so it is. The notion of envy

implies a desire to see the person who is the object of it humbled and

cast down. The Greeks attributed this feeling to their gods, who

looked with an evil eye on great prosperity, and loved to humble it.

But the feeling of envy, if that is the right term, towards him who

has power and credit by reason of his high character for integrity, is

not the same feeling as envy of the wealthy man. The envious of wealth

desire to have the wealth both for itself and for its uses. The

envious of character desire to have the opinion of the character,

because of the profit that is from it, but they may not desire to have

that which is the foundation of the character. If they did, their

desire would be for virtue, and the envious feeling would not exist.

Courage and wisdom are less objects of envy than good character or

wealth, and perhaps, because most men feel that they are not capable

of having the one or the other. The notion of envy implies that the

person has, or thinks he has, the same capability as another who has

something which he has not. A man who is not a painter does not envy a

great painter; a man who is a painter may envy a great painter. The

mass may admire the honest man who is of higher rank than themselves,

even if they have no regard for honesty; but they do not envy; they

wonder as at something which is above them. But if the honest man is

of their own station in life, and has a character of integrity, they

may envy him for his superiority. It appears that if there is a number

of people who are generally on a footing of equality, any superiority

which one may acquire over the rest, makes him an object of envy. If

high character for integrity brings power and credit with it, there

must be some persons with whom the power and the credit prevail, but

these are the persons who are farthest removed from rivalry with him

who has the credit. Those who are nearer to him are the persons who

envy, who feel that the superiority of one man makes their

inferiority. Plutarch assumes the existence of a class who love the

just and give them credit, and of a class who envy them; but the two

classes of persons are not the same.]

[Footnote 728: This name recurs in the Symposium and Phædon of Plato.

The second sentence in this chapter is very corrupt in the original,

and the translation is merely a guess at the meaning. Favonius was

ædile in B.C. 53 (Dion Cassius, 40. c. 45).]

[Footnote 729: Some apology is necessary for translating "pears "

([Greek: apious] ἀπίους, in the original said to mean "pears") into

"parsley." The context shows clearly enough that pears are not meant.

Kaltwasser has made the "pears" into "celery," and there is just as

good reason for making "parsley" of them. Plutarch may have

misunderstood the Roman word "apium" or confounded it with the Greek.]

[Footnote 730: Scipio was the father-in-law of Cornelia, the last wife

of Pompeius (Life of Pompeius, c. 55). As to P. Plautus Hypsæus, see

the Life of Pompeius, c. 55. Titus Annius Milo afterwards killed

Clodius, and Cicero defended him on his trial (Life of Cicero, c.

35).]

[Footnote 731: Pompeius was sole consul B.C. 53, for seven months,

after which he had his father-in-law Scipio as his colleague.]

[Footnote 732: T. Munatius Plancus Bursa was a tribune in B.C. 52.

When Clodius was killed by Milo, the populace, who loved Clodius, took

the dead body into the Curia Hostilia, at the instigation of Bursa and

his colleague Rufus, and making a pile of the benches, burnt the body

and the Curia with it (Dion Cassius, 40. c. 49, 55). Bursa was tried

for his share in this matter and convicted, to the great joy of

Cicero, who was his accuser. Cicero speaks of this affair in a letter

to Marius (_Ad Diversos_, vii. 2).]

[Footnote 733: Servius Sulpicius Rufus, a friend of Cicero, who has

recorded his great talents, and a distinguished Jurist. He was consul

in B.C. 51 with M. Claudius Marcellus.]

[Footnote 734: Kaltwasser refers to the Life of Cæsar, c. 22, for an

explanation of the first part of this chapter; and to the Life of

Cæsar, c. 29, and to that of Pompeius, c. 58, for the transactions

which are mentioned in the latter part of this chapter.]

[Footnote 735: Cæsar took Ariminum (Rimini) in B.C. 49. See the Life

of Cæsar, c. 33, and the Life of Pompeius, c. 60.]

[Footnote 736: In South Italy, now Calabria Ultra. This Munatius was

probably Munatius Rufus.]

[Footnote 737: In Cæsar's Anticato, which has often been mentioned. It

seems that Cæsar raked up all that he could in Cato's life that was

against him, and this affair of Marcia furnished him with plausible

matter. Hortensius died B.C. 50. Drumann remarks (_Porcii_, p. 198),

"that she lived, after the year 56, in which she reconciled Cato with

Munatius Rufus, with the consent of Cato, with Hortensius, after whose

death in the year 50 she returned into her former relation," that is,

she became again the wife of Cato. If so, Cato must have married her

again (see note, c. 25), as Plutarch says that he did. Drumann speaks

as if Cato had a reversion of her, which became an estate in

possession after the estate of Hortensius was determined by her

death.]

[Footnote 738: The quotation is from the Hercules [Greek: Heraklês

mainomenos] Ἡρακλῆς μαινόμενος of Euripides (v. 173), one of the

extant plays.]

[Footnote 739: See Life of Cæsar, c. 72.]

[Footnote 740: Another allusion to the Anticato. It is difficult to

see what probable charge Cæsar could make of this circumstance. The

meaning of Plutarch may easily be conjectured (Drumann, _Porcii_, p.

192).]

[Footnote 741: See the Life of Pompeius, c. 65; and the Life of Cæsar,

c. 39.]

[Footnote 742: Cn. Pompeius, the elder son of Pompeius Magnus is

meant. It is conjectured that the word "young" ([Greek: neon] νέον)

has fallen out of the text (compare c. 58). He had been sent by his

father to get ships, and he arrived with an Egyptian fleet on the

coast of Epirus shortly before the battle of Pharsalus. On the news of

the defeat of Pompeius Magnus, the Egyptians left him (Dion Cassius,

42. c. 12).]

[Footnote 743: He must also have seen Cornelia, for Sextus was with

her. Life of Pompeius, c. 78.]

[Footnote 744: These people are described by Herodotus (iv. 173) as

having been all destroyed by the sands of the deserts, and their

country, which was on the Syrtis, being occupied by the Nasamones.

Lucan (_Pharsalia_, ix. 891) has made the Psylli occupy a conspicuous

place in the march of Cato.

"Gens unica terras

Incolit a sævo serpentum innoxia morsu,

Marmaridæ Psylli: par lingua potentibus herbis,

Ipse cruor tutus, nullumque admittere virus

Vel cantu cessante potest."

Seven days is much too little for the march from Cyrene to the

Carthaginian territory, and there is either an error in Plutarch's

text or a great error in his geography.]

[Footnote 745: The name Libya occurs four times in this chapter. Libya

was the general name for the continent, but the term did not include

Egypt. In the first two instances in which the name occurs in this

chapter, the word is used in the general sense. In the other two

instances it means the Roman province of Africa. Kaltwasser has used

the term Africa in all the four instances. It is immaterial which is

used, if rightly understood in both cases.]

[Footnote 746: See the Life of Cæsar, c. 53, 54, 55, and the

references in the notes.]

[Footnote 747: See the Life of Antonius, c. 81.]

[Footnote 748: See the Life of Cæsar, c. 52, and Dion Cassius, 42, c.

57. This Scipio was unworthy of the name and unequal to the times.]

[Footnote 749: The Greek writers represent the name in different ways.

Plutarch writes [Greek: Itukê] Ἰτύκη. Dion Cassius writes it [Greek:

Outikê] Οὐτική. This old Phœnician city was on the coast near the

mouth of the river Bagradas; but its supposed remains are some

distance inland. (Shaw's _Travels in Barbary_, &c., p. 79, 4to.

edition.)]

[Footnote 750: See the Life of Cæsar, c. 53, and Dion Cassius, 43, c.

7. The battle was fought in B.C. 46.]

[Footnote 751: The son of Cn. Octavius, who was consul B.C. 76. Marcus

was Curule Ædile B.C. 50. (Drumann, _Octavii_, p. 225.)]

[Footnote 752: He was the son of L. Julius Cæsar, consul B.C. 64. The

son was pardoned by Cæsar (_Bell. Afric._ c. 88, 89). Dion Cassius

(43, c. 12) says that Cæsar first brought him to trial, but as he was

unwilling to condemn him by his own authority, he privately got him

put to death. The statement of Dion is deficient in precision,

incredible by reason of Cæsar's well-known clemency, and the

insignificance of Lucius as an enemy, and not altogether reconcilable

with other authorities. (Drumann, _Julii_, p. 125.)]

[Footnote 753: The Phædon which contains the last conversation of

Socrates, and his death. The incident of the reading of the Dialogue,

and the reflections which it suggested, have been used by Addison in

his frigid and bombastic tragedy of Cato.]

[Footnote 754: Kaltwasser quotes a note of Dacier who cannot conceive

how Cato could read so long a Dialogue through twice in so short a

time. It is equally a matter of wonder how any body could know that he

read it through once. The fact that he had the book and was reading it

is all that could be known. Another difficulty that is suggested by

Dacier is, that the Dialogue contains the strongest arguments against

suicide; but perhaps this difficulty is removed by the suggestion that

in one passage it is said that a man should not kill himself till the

deity has sent a kind of necessity; and Cato might conceive, as he did

conceive, that the necessity had come to him.

The suicide of Cato was a peculiar case and hardly belongs to the more

general cases of suicide. His position, if he had lived under the

domination of Cæsar, would have been intolerable to a man of his

principles; for that he might have lived by Cæsar's grace, if he had

chosen, can hardly be doubted notwithstanding Cæsar wrote his

Anticatones.]

[Footnote 755: This was P. Licinius Crassus Junianus, a Junius who had

been adopted by a Crassus, as the name shows.]

[Footnote 756: [Greek: êdê d' ornithes êdon] ήδη δ' ὄρνιθες ηδον. The

translators do not agree about these words. Dacier and others

translate them literally, as I have done. Kaltwasser translated them,

"and already the cocks crowed." He adds that the other translation is

wrong, because it is said immediately after, that it was still night.

But what follows as to the night does not prove that it was dark; it

rather implies that there was not much sleeping time that remained

before morning. Cocks sometimes crow in the night, it is true, but

Plutarch evidently means to show by the expression that the morning

was dawning, and so the birds might be singing, if there were any

birds in Utica. The matter is appropriate for a dissertation, which

would be as instructive as many other dissertations on matters of

antiquity.]

[Footnote 757: Appian (_Civil Wars_, ii. 98, &c.) tells the story of

his death differently. He says that the wound was sewed up, and that

being left alone, he tore his bowels out. But it is improbable that,

if the wound had been sewed up, he would have been left alone. The

story of Dion Cassius (43, c. 11) is the same. See Florus, iv. 2, 71,

who says that he killed himself "circa primam vigiliam."]

[Footnote 758: As he died in B.C. 46, he was in the forty-ninth year

of his age. His chatacter requires no comment; it has been fully

delineated by Plutarch. A single letter of Cato to Cicero is extant

(_Ad Diversos_, xv. 5); and a letter of such a man is worth reading,

though it be short. His speech against the conspirators, which Sallust

has given, may contain the matter, but not the words of Cato.]

[Footnote 759: He had his father's property. After Cæsar's death he

joined M. Brutus, the husband of his sister Portia, and fell at

Philippi B.C. 42. This son of Cato had a younger brother (c. 52),

whose mother was Marcia, but nothing more is known of him. The death

of the wife of Brutus is told in the Life of Brutus, c. 13, 53.]

Plutarch's Lives, Volume 3 (of 4) · 第 50 / 51 题