It has been remarked that the distinctions of number, are founded

upon a modification of the five vowel sounds. Possessives are likewise

founded upon the basis of the vowel sounds. There are five declensions

of the noun to mark the possessive, ending in the possessive in âm,

eem, im, ôm, um, oom. Where the nominative ends with a vowel, the

possessive is made by adding the letter m, as in maimai, a woodcock, ni

maimaim, my woodcock, &c. Where the nominative ends in a consonant, as

in ais, a shell, the full possessive inflection is required, making nin

dais-im, my shell. In the latter form the consonant d, is interposed

between the pronoun and noun, and sounded with the noun, in conformity

with a general rule. Where the nominative ends in the broad, in lieu

of the long sound of a, as in ogimâ, a chief—the possessive is âm. The

sound of i, in the third declension, is that of i in pin, and the sound

of u, in the fifth declension, is that of u in bull. The latter will be

uniformly represented by oo.

The possessive declensions run throughout both the animate and

inanimate classes of nouns, with some exceptions in the latter—as

knife, bowl, paddle, &c.

Inanimate nouns are thus declined.

Nominative, Ishkôdai, Fire.

{ My, Nin Dishkod-aim.

{ Thy, Ki Dishkod-aim.

{ His, O Dishkod-aim.

Possessive. { Our, Ki Dishkod-aim-inân. (in.)

{ — Ni Dishkod-aim-inân. (ex.)

{ Your, Ki Dishkod-aim-iwâ.

{ Their, O Dishkod-aim-iwâ.

Those words which form exceptions from this declension, take the

separable pronouns before them, as follows.

Môkoman, A Knife.

Ni môkoman, My Knife.

Ki môkoman, Thy Knife.

O môkoman, His Knife, &c.

Animate substantives are declined precisely in the same manner as

inanimate, except in the third person, which takes to the possessive

inflections, aim, eem, im, ôm, oom, the objective particle un, denoting

the compound inflection of this person, both in the singular and

plural, aimun, eemun, imun, ômun, oomun, and the variation of the

first vowel sound, âmun. Thus, to furnish an example of the second

declension, pizhik’i, a bison, changes its forms to nim, bizhik-im, my

bison—ke bizhik-im, thy bison, O bizhik-imun, his bison, or bisons.

The cause of this double inflection in the third person, may be left

for future inquiry. But we may add further examples in aid of it. We

cannot simply say, The chief has killed a bear, or, to reverse the

object upon which the energy of the verb is exerted, The bear has

killed a chief. But, ogimâ ogi nissân mukwun, literally, _Chief he has

killed him bear_, or, mukwah ogi nissân ogimân, _Bear he has killed

him chief_. Here the verb and the noun are both objective in _un_,

which is sounded ân, where it comes after the broad sound of a, as in

nissân, objective of the verb to kill. If we confer the powers of the

English possessive, (’s) upon the inflections aim, eem, im, ôm, oom,

and âm respectively, and the meaning of _him_, and of course he, her,

his, hers, they, theirs, (as there is no declension of the pronoun,

and no number to the third person) upon the objective particle un, we

shall then translate the above expression, o bizhik-eemum, _his bison’s

hisn_. If we reject this meaning, as I think we should, the sentence

would read, His bison—him—a mere tautology.

It is true, it may be remarked, that the noun possessed, has a

corresponding termination, or pronominal correspondence, with the

pronoun possessor, also a final termination indicative of its being

the _object_ on which the verb exerts its influence—a mode of

expression, which, so far as relates to the possessive, would be deemed

superfluous, in modern languages; but may have some analogy in the

Latin accusatives am, um, em.

It is a constant and unremitting aim in the Indian languages to

distinguish the actor from the object, partly by prefixes, and partly

by inseparable suffixes. That the termination _un_, is one of these

inseparable particles, and that its office, while it confounds the

number, is to designate the object, appears probable from the fact,

that it retains its connexion with the noun, whether the latter follow

or precede the verb, or whatever its position in the sentence may be.

Thus we can, without any perplexity in the meaning say,

_Waimittigôzhiwug ogi sagiân Pontiac-un_, Frenchmen they did love

Pontiac him. Or to reverse it, _Pontiac-un Waimittigôzhiwug ogi

sagiân_, Pontiac, he did Frenchmen he loved. The termination un in both

instances, clearly determines the object beloved. So in the following

instance, _Sagunoshug ogi sagiân Tecumseh-un_, Englishmen, they did

love Tecumseh, or _Tecumseh-un Sagunoshug oji sagiân_, Tecumseh, he did

Englishmen he loved.

In tracing the operation of this rule, through the doublings of the

language, it is necessary to distinguish every modification of sound,

whether it is accompanied, or not accompanied by a modification of

the sense. The particle un, which thus marks _the third person and

persons_, is sometimes pronounced _wun_, and sometimes _yun_, as the

harmony of the word to which it is suffixed, may require. But not the

slightest change is thereby made in its meaning.

Wâbojeeg ogi meegân-ân nâdowaisi-wun.

Wâbojeeg fought his enemies. L. W. he did fight them, his enemy, or

enemies.

O sâgi-ân inini-wun.

He, or she loves a man. L. He, or she, loves him-man, or men.

Kigo-yun waindji pimmâdizziwâd.

They subsist on fish. L. Fish or fishes, they upon them, they live.

Ontwa o sagiân odi-yun.

Ontwa loves his dog. L. O. he loves him, his dog, or dogs.

In these sentences the letters w and y are introduced before the

inflection un, merely for euphony’s sake, and to enable the speaker

to utter the final vowel of the substantive, and the inflective

vowel, without placing both under the accent. It is to be remarked in

these examples, that the verb has a corresponding inflection with the

noun, indicated by the final consonant n, as in sagiâ-n, objective

of the verb to love. This is merely a modification of un, where it

is requisite to employ it after broad a (aw,) and it is applicable

to nouns as well as verbs whenever they end in that sound. Thus, in

the phrase, he saw a chief, O wâbumâ-n O gimâ-n, both noun and verb

terminate in n. It is immaterial to the sense, which precedes. And this

leads to the conclusion, which we are, in some measure, compelled to

state, in anticipation of our remarks on the verb. That verbs must not

only agree with their nominatives in number, person and _gender_ (we

use the latter term for want of a more appropriate one,) but also with

their objectives. Hence the objective sign n, in the above examples.

Sometimes this sign is removed from the ending of the verb, to make

room for the plural of the nominative person, and is subjoined to the

latter. Thus,

O sagiâ(wâ)n.

They love them, him or them.

In this phrase the interposed syllable (wâ) is, apparently, the

plural—it is a reflective plural—of _he_—the latter being, indicated

as usual, by the sign O. It has been observed, above, that the

deficiency in number, in the third person, is sometimes supplied “by

numerical inflections in the relative words of the sentence,” and this

interposed particle, (wâ) affords an instance in point. The number of

the nominative pronoun appears to be thus rendered precise, but the

objective is still indefinite.

When two nouns are used without a verb in the sentence, or when two

nouns compose the whole matter uttered, being in the third person, both

have the full objective inflection. Thus,

Os-(un.) Odi-(yun.)

His father’s dog. L. His father—his dog or dogs.

There are certain words, however, which will not admit the objective

_un_, either in its simple or modified forms. These are rendered

objective in een, or ôn.

O wâbumâ-(n,) ossin-(een.)

He sees the stone. L. He sees him—stone or stones.

O wâbumâ-(n) mittig o mizh-(een.) L. He sees him, tree or trees.

He sees an oak tree.

O mittig wâb (een,) gyai o bikwuk-(ôn.)

His bow and his arrows. L. His bow him, and his arrows him or them.

Odyâ | wâ | wâ (n,) akkik-(ôn.)

They possess a kettle. L. They own them, kettle or kettles.

The syllable wâ, in the verb of the last example included between bars,

(instead of parentheses,) is the reflective plural _they_, pointed out

in a preceding instance.

I shall conclude these remarks, with full examples of each pronominal

declension.

a. First declension, forming the first and second persons in _aim_, and

the third in _aimun_.

Nominative. { Pinâi, a partridge.

{ Pinâi-wug, partridges.

{ My Nim Bin-aim.

{ Thy Ki Bin-aim.

1 & 2d P. { Our Ki Bin-aim inân. Inclusive plural.

{ Our Ni Bin-aiminân. Exclusive plural.

{ Your Ki Bin-aim wâ.

3rd P. { His O Bin-aim, (un.)

{ Their O Bin-aim iwâ (n.)

e. Second declension forming the first and second persons in _eem_, and

the third in _eemun_,

{ Ossin, a stone.

Nominative. { Ossineen, stones.

{ My Nin Dossin-eem.

{ Thy Ki Dossin-eem.

1 & 2 P. { Our Ki Dossin-eeminân. (in.)

{ Our Ni Dossin-eeminân. (ex.)

{ Your Ke Dossin-eemewâ.

3rd P. { His O Dossin-eem(un.)

{ Their O Dossin-eemewâ (n.)

i. Third declension forming the first and second persons in _im_, and

the third in _imun_.

Nominative. {Ais, a shell.

{Ais-ug, shells.

{My Nin Dais-im.

{Thy Ki Dais-im.

1 & 2d P. {Our Ki Dais-iminân. (in.)

{Our Ni Dais-iminân. (ex.)

{Your Ki Dais-imiwâ.

3rd P. {His O Dais-im (un.)

{Their O Dais-imewâ (n.)

o. Fourth declension forming the first and second persons in _ôm_, and

the third in _ômun_.

Nominative. {Monidô, a Spirit.

{Monidôg, Spirits.

{My Ni Monid-ôm.

{Thy Ki Monid-ôm.

1 & 2 P. {Our Ki Monid-ôminân. (in.)

{Our Ni Monid-ôminân. (ex.)

{Your Ki Monid-ômiwâ.

3rd P. {His O monid-ôm (un.)

{Their O Monid-ômewâ (n.)

u. (oo) Fifth declension forming the first and second persons in _oom_,

and the third in _oomun_.

Nominative. {Môz, a Moose.

{Môzôg, Moose.

{My Ni Môz-oom.

{Thy Ki Môz-oom.

1 & 2 P. {Our Ki Môz-oominân. (in.)

{Our Ki Môz-oominân. (ex.)

{Your Ki Môz-oominân. (in.)

3rd P. {His O Môz oom (un.)

{Their O Môz oomiwa (n.)

aw. Additional declension, required when the noun ends in the broad,

instead of the long sound of a, forming the possessive in _âm_, and the

objective in _âmun_.

Nominative. {Ogimâ, a Chief.

{Ogimâg, Chiefs.

{My Ni Dôgim âm.

{Thy Ki Dôgim âm

1 & 2 P. {Our Ki Dôgim âminân. (in.)

{Our Ni Dôgim âminân. (ex.)

{Your Ki Dôgim âmiwâ.

3 P {His O Dôgim âm (un.)

{Their O Dôgim âmiwâ (n.)

The abbreviations, _in._ and _ex._ in these declensions, mark the

inclusive and exclusive forms of the pronoun plural. The inflection

of the third person, as it is superadded to the first and second, is

included between parentheses, that the eye, unaccustomed to these

extended forms, may readily detect it.

Where the inseparable, instead of the separable pronoun is employed,

the possessive inflection of the first and second person is dispensed

with, although the inflection of the third is still retained.

Os: Father.

_S. singular._

Nos. My father.

Kos. Thy father.

Os-un, His father. _Sing. and plural._

Nos-inân. Our father. (ex.)

Kos-inân. Our father. (in.)

Kos-iwâ. Your father.

Os-iwân. Their father. _Sing. and plural._

_S. plural._

Nos-ug. My fathers.

Kos-ug. Thy fathers.

Os-un. His fathers. _Sing. and plural._

Nos-inân ig. Our fathers. (ex.)

Kos-inân ig. Our fathers. (in.)

Kos-iwâg. Your fathers.

Os-iwân. Their fathers. _Sing. and plural._

The word dog, and this word alone, is declined in the following manner.

Annimoosh: a Dog.

_S. singular._

Nin Dy (or Di) My dog.

Ki Dy Thy dog.

O Dy-un His dog or dogs.

Ki Dy-inân Our dog (in.)

Ni Dy-inân Our dog (ex.)

Ki Dy-iwâ Your dog.

O Dy-iwân Their dog, &c.

_S. plural._

Nin Dy-ug My dogs.

Ki Dy-ug Thy dogs.

O Dy-un His dogs, &c.

Ki Dy-inânig Our dogs (in.)

Ni Dy-inânig Our dogs (ex.)

Ki Dy-iwâg Your dogs.

O Dy-iwân His dogs, &c.

The word _Dy_ which supplies this declension is derived from _Indyiàm_

mine. _pron. an._—a derivative form of the word, which is, however

exclusively restricted, in its meaning, to the dog. If the expression

Nin Dy or N’ Dy, is sometimes applied to the horse, it is because it

is thereby intended to call him, my dog, from his being in a state of

servitude similar to that of the dog. It must be borne in mind, as

connected with this subject, that the dog, in high northern latitudes,

and even as far south as 42 deg. is both a beast of draught and of

burden. He is compelled during the winter season to draw the _odàban_,

or Indian sleigh; and sometimes to support the burden upon his back, by

means of a kind of drag constructed of slender poles.

A review of the facts which have been brought together respecting the

substantive, will show that the separable or inseparable pronouns under

the form of prefixes, are throughout required. It will also indicate,

that the inflections of the first and second persons which occupy

the place of possessives, and those of the third person, resembling

objectives, pertain to words, which are either primitives, or denote

but a single object, as moose, fire. There is, however another class of

substantives, or substantive expressions, and an extensive class—for

it embraces a great portion of the compound descriptive terms—in the

use of which, no pronominal prefixes are required, The distinctions

of person are, exclusively, supplied by pronominal suffixes. Of this

character are the words descriptive of country, place of dwelling,

field of battle, place of employment, &c. The following example will

furnish the inflexions applicable to this entire class of words.

Aindâd: Home, or place of dwelling.

_S. singular._

Aindâ-yân. My home.

Aindâ-yun. Thy home.

Aindâ-d. His home.

Aindâ-yâng. Our home. (Ex.)

Aindâ-yung. Our home. (in.)

Aindâ-yaig. Your home.

Aindâ-wâd. Their home.

_S. plural._

Aindâ-yân-in. My homes.

Aindâ-yun-in. Thy homes.

Aindâ-jin. His homes.

Aindâ-yâng-in. Our homes. (ex.)

Aindâ-yung-in. Our homes. (in.)

Aindâ-yaig-in. Your homes.

Aindâ-wâdjin. Their homes.

LECTURE II.

_Further Remarks on the Substantive. Local, diminutive, derogative,

and tensal inflections. Mode in which the latter are employed

to denote the disease of individuals, and to indicate the past

and future seasons. Restricted or sexual terms. Conversion of

the substantive into a verb, and the reciprocal character of the

verb, by which it is converted into a substantive. Derivative and

compound substantives. Summary of the properties of this part of

speech._

In the view which has been taken of the substantive in the preceding

lecture, it has been deemed proper to exclude several topics,

which, from their peculiarities, it was believed, could be more

satisfactorily discussed in a separate form. Of this character are

those modifications of the substantive by which locality, diminution, a

defective quality, and the past tense are expressed; by which various

adjective and adverbial significations are given; and finally, the

substantives themselves converted into verbs. Such are also the mode

of indicating the masculine and feminine (both merged, as we have

shown, in the animate class) and those words which are of a strictly

_sexual_ character, or are restricted in their _use_ either to males

or females. Not less interesting is the manner of forming derivatives,

and of conferring upon the derivatives so formed, a _personality_,

distinguished as either animate or inanimate, at the option of the

speaker.

Much of the flexibility of the substantive is derived from these

properties, and they undoubtedly add much to the figurative character

of the language. Some of them have been thought analogous to case,

particularly that inflection of the noun which indicates the locality

of the object. But if so, then there would be equally strong reasons

for establishing an _adjective_, and an _adverbial_, as well as a

_local_ case, and a plurality of forms in each. But it is believed

that no such necessity exists. There is no regular declension of

these forms, and they are all used under limitations and restrictions

incompatible with the true principles of case.

It is under this view of the subject, that the discussion of these

forms has been transferred, together with the other accidents of the

substantive just adverted to, and reserved, as the subject matter of a

separate lecture. And in now proceeding to express the conclusions at

which we have arrived touching these points, it will be an object so to

compress and arrange the materials before us, as to present within a

small compass, the leading facts and examples, upon which each separate

position depends.

1. That quality of the noun, which, in the shape of an inflection,

denotes the relative situation of the object, by the contiguous

position of some accessory object, is expressed in the English

language, by the prepositions _in_, _into_, _at_, or _on_. In the

Indian they are denoted by an inflection. Thus the phrase, In the box,

is rendered in the Indian by one word, _mukukoong_. Of this word,

mukuk, simply, is box. The termination _oong_, denoting the locality,

not of the box, but of the object sought after. The expression appears

to be precise, although there is no definite article in the language.

The substantive takes this form, most commonly, after a question has

been put, as, Anindl ni môkoman-ais? where is my penknife? Mukukoong,

(in the box,) addôpowin-ing, (on the table,) are definite replies

to this question. But the form is not restricted to this relation.

Chimân-ing n’guh pôz, I shall embark in the canoe; wakyigun n’guh izhâ,

I shall go into the house, are perfectly correct, though somewhat

formal expressions, when the canoe or the house are present to the

speaker’s view.

The meaning of these inflections has been restricted to _in_,

_into_, _at_, and _on_. But they are the more appropriate forms of

expressing the three first senses, there being other modes beside

these of expressing the preposition _on_. These modes consist in

the use of prepositions and will be explained under that head. The

choice of the one, or the other, is, however, with the speaker.

Generally, the inflection is employed, when there is some circumstance

or condition of the noun, either concealed, or not fully apparent.

Thus, Muzzinyigun-ing, is the appropriate term for _in the book_, and

_may_ also be used to signify _on the book_. But if it is meant only

to signify _on_ the book, something visible being referred to, the

preposition _ogidj_ would be used, that word indicating with certainty

_on_, and never _in_. Wakyigun-ing indicates with clearness, _in

the house_; but if it is necessary to say _on the house_, and it be

meant at the same time to exclude any reference to the interior, the

expression would be changed to _ogidj wakyigun_.

It will be proper further to remark, in this place, in the way of

limitation, that there is also a separate preposition signifying

_in_. It is _pinj_. But the use of this word does not, in all cases,

supersede the necessity of inflecting the noun. Thus the expression

_pindigain_, is literally _walk in_, or enter. But if it is intended

to say, walk in the house, the local, and not the simple form of house

must be used; and the expression is—Pindigain waky´igun-ing, _Enter in

the house_,—the verbal form which this preposition pinj puts on, having

no allusion to the act of _walking_, but merely implying position.

The local inflection, which in the above examples, is _ing_ and _oong_,

is further changed to _aing_ and _eeng_, as the ear may direct—changes

which are governed chiefly by the terminal vowel of the noun. Examples

will best supply the rule, as well as the exceptions to it.

SIMPLE FORM. LOCAL FORM.

a. First inflection in _aing_.

Ishkodai Fire Ishkod-aing In, &c. the fire.

Muskodai Prairie Muskod-aing In, &c. the prairie.

Mukkuddai Powder Mukkud-aing In, &c. the powder.

Pimmedai Grease Pimmid-aing In, &c. the grease.

e. Second inflection in _eeng_.[26]

Seebi River Seeb-eeng In, &c. the river.

Neebi Water Neeb-eeng In, &c. the water.

Miskwi Blood Miskw-eeng In, &c. the blood.

Unneeb Elm Unneeb-eeng In, &c. the elm.

i. Third inflection in _ing_.

Kôn Snow Kôn-ing In, &c. the snow.

Min Berry Meen-ing In, &c. the berry.

Chimân Canoe Chimân-ing In, &c. the canoe.

Muzziny´egun Book Muzziny´egun-ing In, &c. the book.

o. Fourth inflection in _oong_.

Azhibik Rock Azhibik-oong In, &c. the rock.

Gizhig Sky Gizhig-oong In, &c. the sky.

Kimmiwun Rain Kimmiwun-oong In, &c. the rain.

Akkik Kettle Akkik-oong In, &c. the kettle.

Throw it in the fire.

1. Puggidôn ishkod-aing.

Go into the prairie.

2. Muskôdaing izhân.

He is in the elm.

3. Unneeb-eeng iâ.

It is on the water.

4. Nib-eeng attai.

Put it on the table.

5. Addôpôwin-ing attôn.

Look in the book.

6. Enâbin muzziny´igun-ing.

You stand in the rain.

7. Kimmiwun-oong ki nibow.

What have you in that box.

8. Waigonain aitaig mukuk-oong.

Put it in the kettle.

9. Akkik-oong attôn, or Pôdawain.

My bow is not in the lodge; neither is it in the canoe,

nor on the rock.

10. Kâwin _pindig_ iâsi ni mittigwâb; kâwiuh gyai

chimân-_ing_; kâwin gyai âzhibik-_oong_.

An attentive inspection of these examples will show, that the

local form pertains either to such nouns of the animate class, as

are in their nature inanimates, or at most possessed of vegetable

life. And here another conclusion presses upon us—that where these

local terminations, in all their variety, are added to the names of

animated beings, when such names are the nominatives of adjectives or

adjective-nouns, these words are converted into terms of qualification,

indicating _like_, _resembling_, _equal_. Thus, if we wish to say to

a boy, he is like a man, the expression is, Inin-ing izzhinâgozzi;

or if to a man, he is like a bear, Mukk-oong izzhinâgozzi; or to a

bear, he is like a horse, Pabaizhikogâzh-ing izzhinâgozzi. In all

these expressions the word _izzhi_, is combined with the pronominal

inflection _â_ (or nâ) and the animate termination _gozzi_. And the

inflection of the nominative is merely an adjective correspondence

with _izzhi_:—a term indicative of the general qualities of persons

or animated beings. Where a comparison is instituted or a resemblance

pointed out between inanimate instead of animate objects, the

inflection _gozzi_, is changed to _gwud_, rendering the expression,

which was, in the animate form, izzhinâ_gozzi_, in the inanimate form,

izzhinâ_gwud_.

There is another variation of the local form of the noun, in

addition to those above instanced, indicative of locality in a more

general sense. It is formed by _ong_ or _nong_—frequent terminations

in geographical names. Thus from Ojibwai, (Chippewa), is formed

Ojibwai_nong_, Place of the Chippewas. From Wamittigozhiwug, Frenchmen,

is formed Wamittigozhi_nong_, Place of Frenchmen. From Ishpatinâ hill,

Ishpatinong, Place of the hill, &c. The termination _ing_, is also

sometimes employed in this more general sense, as in the following

names of places.

Monomonikân_ing_. In the place of wild rice.

Moninggwunikân_ing_. In the place of Sparrows.

Ongwashagoosh_ing_. In the place of the fallen tree. &c.

2. The diminutive forms of the noun are indicated by ais, eas, ôs,

and aus, as the final vowel of the word may require. Thus Ojibwai,

a Chippewa, becomes Ojibw-ais, a little Chippewa: Iniṅ´i, a man,

inin-ees, a little man: Amik, a beaver, amik-ôs, a young beaver: Ogimâ,

a chief, ogim-âs, a little chief, or a chief of little authority.

Further examples may be added.

SIMPLE FORM. DIMINUTIVE FORM.

—ais.

A woman Eekwâ Eekwâz-ais.

A partridge Pinâ Pin-ais.

A woodcock Mâimâi Mâim-ais.

An island Minnis Minnis-ais.

A grape Shômin Shômin-ais.

A knife Môkoman Môkoman-ais.

—ees.

A stone Ossin Ossin-ees.

A river Seebi Seeb-ees.

A pigeon Omimi Omim-ees.

A bison Pizhik´i Pizhik-ees.

A potatoe Opin Opin-ees.

A bird Pinâisi Pinâish-ees.

—ôs.

A moose Môz Môz-ôs.

An otter Nigik Nigik-ôs.

A reindeer Addik Addik-ôs.

An elk Mushkôs Mushkos-ôs.

A hare Wâbôs Wâbôs-ôs.

A box Mukuk Mukuk-ôs.

—aus.

A bass Ogâ Og-âs.

A medal Shôniâ Shôni-âs.

A bowl Onâgun Onâg-âns.

A bed Nibâgun Nibâg-aûns.

A gun Pâshkizzigun Pâshkizzig-âns.

A house Wakyigun Wakyig-àns.

In the four last examples, the letter n, of the diminutive, retains its

full sound.

The use of diminutives has a tendency to give conciseness to the

language. As far as they can be employed they supersede the use

of adjectives, or prevent the repetition of them. And they enable

the speaker to give a turn to the expression, which is often very

successfully employed in producing ridicule or contempt. When applied

to the tribes of animals, or to inorganic objects, their meaning,

however, is, very nearly, limited to an inferiority in size or age.

Thus, in the above examples, pizhik-ees, signifies a calf, omim-ees, a

young pigeon, and ossin-ees, a pebble &c. But inin-ees, and ogim-âs,

are connected with the idea of mental or conventional as well as bodily

inferiority.

1. I saw a little chief, standing upon a small island, with an inferior

medal about his neck.

Ogimâs n’gi wâbumâ nibowid minnisainsing onâbikowân shoniâsun.

2. Yamoyden threw at a young pigeon.

Ogi pukkitalwun omimeesun Yamoyden.

3. A buffalo calf stood in a small stream.

Pizhikees ki nibowi sibeesing.

4. The little man fired at a young moose.

Ininees ogi pâshkizwân môzôsun.

5. Several diminutive looking bass were lying in a small bowl, upon a

small table.

Addôpowinaising attai onâgâns abbiwâd ogâsug.

Some of these sentences afford instances of the use, at the same

time, of both the local and diminutive inflections. Thus the word

minnisainsing, signifies literally, _in the little island_; seebees

ing, _in the little stream_; addôpowinais ing, _on the small table_.

3. The preceeding forms are not the only ones by which adjective

qualities are conferred upon the substantive. The syllable _ish_

when added to a noun indicates a bad or dreaded quality, or conveys

the idea of imperfection or decay. The sound of this inflection is

sometimes changed to eesh oosh, or aush. Thus, Chimân, a canoe, becomes

Chimânish, a bad canoe; Ekwai, a woman, Ekwaiwish, a bad woman; nibi,

water, becomes nibeesh, turbid or strong water; mittig, a tree, becomes

mittigoosh, a decayed tree; akkik, a kettle, akkikoosh, a worn-out

kettle. By a further change, wibid, a tooth, becomes wibid_âsh_, a

decayed or aching tooth, &c. Throughout these changes the final sound

of _sh_ is retained, so that this sound alone, at the end of a word, is

indicative of a faulty quality.

In a language in which the expressions bad-dog, and faint-heart are

the superlative terms of reproach, and in which there are few words

to indicate the modifications between positively good, and positively

bad, it must appear evident, that adjective inflections of this kind,

must be convenient, and sometimes necessary modes of expression. They

furnish a means of conveying censure and dislike, which though often

mild, is sometimes severe. Thus if one person has had occasion to

refuse the offered hand of another—for it must be borne in mind, that

the Indians are a hand-shaking people, as well as the Europeans—the

implacable party has it at his option in referring to the circumstance,

to use the adjective form of hand, not _onindj_, but oninj_eesh_,

which would be deemed contemptuous in a high degree. So also, instead

of odâwai winini, a trader, or man who sells, the word may be changed

to odâwai winini-_wish_, implying a bad or dishonest trader. It is

seldom that a more pointed, or positive mode of expressing personal

disapprobation or dislike is required, for, generally speaking, more is

implied by these modes than is actually expressed.

The following examples are drawn from the inorganic as well as organic

creation, embracing the two classes of nouns that the operation of

these forms may be fully perceived.

SIMPLE FORM. ADJECTIVE FORM.

—ish— A bowl Onâgun Onâgun-ish.

A house Wakyigun Wakyigun-ish.

A pipe Opwâgun Opwâgun-ish.

A boy Kweewizais Kweewizais-ish.

A man Inini Ininiw-ish.

Water Neebi Neeb-ish.

—eesh— A stone Ossin Ossin-eesh.

A potatoe Opin Opin-eesh.

A fly Ojee Oj-eesh.

A bow Mittigwâb Mittigwâb-eesh.

—oosh— An otter Neegik Neegik-oosh.

A beaver Ahmik Ahmik-oosh.

A reindeer Addik Addik-oosh.

A kettle Akkeek Akkeek-oosh.

An axe Wagâkwut Wagâkwut-oosh.

—aush— A foot Ozid Ozid-âsh.

An arm Onik Onik-âsh.

An ear Otowug Otowug-âsh.

A hoof Wunnussid Wunnussid-âsh.

A rush mat Appukwa Appukw-âsh.

These forms cannot be said, strictly, to be without analogy in the

English, in which the limited number of words terminating in _ish_, as

saltish, blackish, furnish a correspondence in sound, with the first

adjective form.

It may subserve the purposes of generalization to add, as the result of

the foregoing inquiries, that substantives have a diminutive form, made

in ais, ees, ôs, or âs; a derogative form, made in ish, eesh, oosh, or

âsh; and a local form, made in aing, eeng, ing, or oong. By a principle

of accretion, the second, or third, may be added to the first form, and

the third to the second.

EXAMPLE.

Serpent, s. Kinai´bik.

——s. diminutive ——ôns, implying Little serpent.

——s. derogative ——ish, “ Bad serpent.

——s. local ——ing, “ In (the) serpent.

——s. dim. & der. ——ônsish “ Little bad serpent.

——s. dim. & lo. ——ônsing “ In (the) little serpent.

——s. dim. der. & lo. ——ônsishing, “ In (the) little bad serpent.

4. More attention has, perhaps, been bestowed upon these points, than

their importance demanded, but in giving anything like a comprehensive

sketch of the substantive, they could not be omitted; and if mentioned

at all, it became necessary to pursue them through their various

changes and limitations. Another reason has presented itself. In

treating of an unwritten language of which others are to judge chiefly

from examples, it appeared desirable that the positions advanced

should be accompanied by the data upon which they respectively rest—at

least, by so much of the data employed, as to enable philologists to

appreciate the justice or detect the fallacy of our conclusions. To the

few, who take any interest in the subject at all, minuteness will not

seem tedious, and the examples will be regarded with deep interest.

As much of our time as we have already devoted to these lesser points

of inquiry, it will be necessary, at this place, to point out other

inflections and modifications of the substantive, to clear it from

obscurities, that we may go into the discussion of the other parts of

speech, unencumbered.

Of these remaining forms, none is more interesting than that, which

enables the speaker by a simple inflection, to denote that the

individual named has ceased to exist. This delicate mode of conveying

melancholy intelligence, or alluding to the dead, is effected by

placing the object in the past tense.

Aiekid-ôpun aieko Garrangula-bun.

So the deceased Garrangula spoke.

The syllable _bun_, in this sentence, added to the noun, and _ôpun_

added to the verb, place both in the past tense. And although the death

of the Indian orator is not mentioned, that fact would be invariably

inferred.

Names which do not terminate in a vowel sound, require a vowel prefixed

to the tensal inflection, rendering it _ôbun_, or _ebun_. Inanimate, as

well as animate nouns take these inflections.

PRESENT. PAST FORM.

Tecumseh, Tecumsi-bun.

Tammany, Tamani-bun.

Skenandoah, Skenandoa-bun.

Nôs, (my father) Nos-êbun.

Pontiac, Pontiac-ibun.

Waub Ojeeg, Waub Ojeeg-ibun.

Tarhe, Tarhi-bun.

Mittig, (a tree) Mittig-ôbun.

Akkik, (a kettle) Akkik-ôbun.

Môz, (a moose) Môz-ôbun.

By prefixing the particle _Tah_ to these words, and changing the

inflection of the animate nouns to _iwi_, and the inanimates to _iwun_,

they are rendered future. Thus Tah Pontiac-iwi: Tah Mittig-iwun, &c.

The names for the seasons only come under the operation of these rules,

when the year before the last, or the year after the next, is referred

to. The last, and the ensuing season, are indicated as follows.

_Present._ _Last._ _Next._

Spring, Seegwun, Seegwun-oong, Segwun.

Summer, Neebin, Neebin-oong, Neebing.

Autumn, Tahgwâgi, Tahgwâg-oong, Tahgwâgig.

Winter, Peebôn, Peebônoong, Peebông.

I spent last winter in hunting.

Ning`i nunda-wainjigai peebônoong.

I shall go to Detroit next spring.

Ninjah izhâ Wâwiâ´tunong seegwung.

5. Sexual nouns. The mode of indicating the masculine and feminine,

having been omitted in the preceding lecture, as not being essential to

any concordance with the verb or adjective, is nevertheless connected

with a striking peculiarity of the language—the exclusive use of

certain words by one or the other sex. After having appeared to the

founders of the language, a distinction not necessary to be engrafted

in the syntax, there are yet a limited number of words, to which the

idea of sex, so strongly attaches, that it would be deemed the height

of impropriety in a female to use the masculine, and in male to use the

feminine expressions.

Of this nature are the words _Neeji_, and _Nindongwai_, both signifying

my friend, but the former is appropriated to males, and the latter

to females. A Chippewa cannot therefore say to a female my friend,

nor a Chippewa woman to a male, my friend. Such an interchange of

the terms would imply arrogance or indelicacy. Nearly the whole of

their interjections—and they are numerous—are also thus exclusively

appropriated; and no greater breach of propriety in speech could

be committed, than a woman’s uttering the masculine exclamation of

surprise _Tyâ!_ or a man’s descending to the corresponding female

interjection _N’yâ!_

The word _neenimoshai_, my cousin, on the contrary, can only be

applied, like husband and wife, by a male to a female, or a female to a

male. If a male wishes to express this relation of a male, the term is

_Neetowis_: and the corresponding female term _Neendongwooshai_.

The terms for uncle and aunt, are also of a two-fold character, though

not restricted like the preceding in their use. Neemishomai is my

uncle by the father’s side: Neezhishai, my uncle by the mother’s side.

Neezigwoos is my paternal aunt, neewishai my maternal aunt.

There are also exclusive words to designate elder brother, and younger

brother: But what would not be expected after the foregoing examples,

they are indiscriminately applied to younger brothers and sisters.

Neesgai, is my elder brother, and neemissai my elder sister. Neeshemai,

my younger brother, or younger sister, and may be applied to any

brother or sister except the eldest.

The number of words to which the idea of sex is attached, in the usual

acceptation, is limited. The following may be enumerated.

_Masculine._ _Feminine._

Irin´i, A man. Ekwai´, A woman.

Kwee´wizais, A boy. Ekwa´zais, A girl.

Oskinahwai, A young man. Oskineegakwai, A young woman.

Akiwaizi, An old man. Mindimô´ed, An old woman.

Nôsai, My father. Nin Gah, My mother.

Ningwisis, My son. Nin dânis, My daughter.

Ni ningwun, My son-in-law. Nis sim, My daughter-in-law.

Ni nâbaim, My husband. Nimindimôimish, My wife.

Nimieshomiss, My grandfather. Nôkômiss, My grandmother.

Ogimâ, A chief. Ogemâkwâ, A chiefess.

Addik, A reindeer. Neetshâni, A doe.

Annimoosh, A dog. Kiskisshâi, A bitch.

The sex of the brute creation is most commonly denoted by prefixing the

words _Iâbai_, male; and _nôzhai_, female.

6. Reciprocal changes of the noun. The pronominal particles with which

verbs as well as substantives, are generally encumbered and the habit

of using them in particular and restricted senses, leaves but little

occasion for the employment of either the present or past infinitive.

Most verbs are transitives. A Chippewa does not say, I love, without

indicating, by an inflection of the verb, the object beloved; and thus

the expression is constantly, I love him, or her, &c. Neither does the

infinitive appear to be generally the ultimate form of the verb.

In changing their nouns into verbs, it will not therefore be expected,

that the change should uniformly result in the infinitive, for which

there is so little use; but in such of the personal forms of the

various moods as circumstances may require. Most commonly the third

person singular of the indicative, and the second person singular of

the imperative, are the simplest aspects under which the verb appears;

and hence these forms have been sometimes mistaken for, and reported

as the present infinitive. There are some instances, in which the

infinitive is employed. Thus, although an Indian cannot say, I love,

thou lovest, &c. without employing the objective forms of the verb

to love: yet he can say I laugh, I cry, &c. expressions in which the

action being confined to the speaker himself, there is no transition

demanded. And in all similar instances the present infinitive, with the

proper pronoun prefixed, is employed.

There are several modes of transforming a substantive into a verb. The

following examples will supply the rules, so far as known, which govern

these changes.

Indicative. Imperative.

Chimân, a canoe. Chimai, he paddles. Chimain, paddle thou.

Pashkizzigun, a gun. Pashkizzigai, he fires. Pashkizzigain, fire thou.

Jeesidyigun, a broom. Jeesidyigai, he sweeps. Jeesidyigain, sweep thou.

Weedjeeagun, a helper. Weedôkagai, he helps. Weedjeei-wain, help thou.

Ojibwâi, a Chippewa. Ojibwâmoo, he } Ojibwâmoon, speak }

speaks Chippewa. } thou Chippewa. }

Another class of nouns is converted into the first person, indicative

of a pseudo declarative verb, in the following manner.

Monido, A spirit. Ne Monidôw, I (am) a spirit.

Wassaiâ, Light. Ne Wassaiâw, I (am) light.

Ishkodai, Fire. Nin Dishkodaiw, I (am) fire.

Weendigô, A monster. Ni Weendigôw, I (am) a monster.

Addik, A deer. Nin Daddikoow, I (am) a deer.

Wakyigun, A house. Ni Wakyiguniw, I (am) a house.

Pinggwi, Dust, ashes. Nim Pinggwiw, I (am) dust, &c.

The word am, included in parentheses, is not in the original, unless we

may suppose the terminals, ow, aw, iw, oow, to be derivatives from Iaw.

These changes are reciprocated by the verb, which, as often as occasion

requires, is made to put on a substantive form. The particle _win_

added to the indicative of the verb, converts it into a substantive.

Thus—

Keegido, He speaks. Keegidowin, Speech.

Pâshkizzigai, He fires. Pashkizzigaiwin, Ammunition.

Agindasoo, He counts. Agindasoowin, Numbers.

Wahyiâzhinggai, He cheats. Wahyiazhinggaiwin, Fraud.

Minnikwâi, He drinks. Minnikwâiwin, Drink.

Kubbâshi, He encamps. Kubbâishiwin, An encampment.

Meegâzoo, He fights. Meegâzoowin, A fight.

Ojeengai, He kisses. Ojeendiwin, A kiss.

Annôki, He works. Annôkiwin, Work.

Pâpi, He laughs. Pâpiwin, Laughter.

Pimâdizzi, He lives. Pimâdizziwin, Life.

Onwâibi, He rests. Onwâibiwin, Rest.

Annamiâ, He prays. Annamiâwin, Prayer.

Nibâ, He sleeps. Nibâwin, Sleep.

Odâwai, He trades. Odâwaiwin, Trade.

Adjectives are likewise thus turned into substantives.

Keezhaiwâdizzi, He generous. Keezhaiwâdizziwin, Generosity.

Minwaindum, He happy. Minwaindumowin, Happiness.

Keezhaizeâwizzi, He industrious. Keezhaizhâwizziwin, Industry.

Kittimâgizzi, He poor. Kittimâgizziwin, Poverty.

Aukkoossi, He sick. Aukkoossiwin, Sickness.

Kittimishki, He lazy. Kittimishkiwin, Laziness.

Nishkâdizzi, He angry. Nishkâdizziwin, Anger.

Baikâdizzi, She chaste. Baikâdizziwin, Chastity.

In order to place the substantives thus formed, in the third person,

corresponding with the indicative from which they were changed, it is

necessary only to prefix the proper pronoun. Thus, Ogeezhaiwâdizziwin,

his generosity, &c.

7. Compound substantives. The preceding examples have been given

promiscuously from the various classes of words, primitive and

derivative, simple and compound. Some of these words express but

a single idea, as, ôs, father—gah, mother—môz, a moose—kâg, a

porcupine—mang, a loon—and appear to be incapable of further division.

All such words may be considered as primitives, although some of them

may be contractions of dissyllabic words. There are also a number of

dissyllables, and _possibly_ some trisyllables, which, in the present

state of our analytical knowledge of the language, may be deemed both

simple and primitive. Such are neebi, water; ossin, a stone; geezis,

the sun; nodin, wind. But it may be premised, as a principle which our

investigations have rendered probable, that all polysyllabic words, all

words of three syllables, _so far as examined_, and most words of two

syllables, are compounds.

The application of a syntax, formed with a view to facilitate the

rapid conveyance of ideas by consolidation, may, it is presumable, have

early led to the coalescence of words, by which all the relations of

object and action, time and person, were expressed. And in a language

which is only spoken, and not written, the primitives would soon become

obscured and lost in the multiform appendages of time and person,

and the recondite connexion of actor and object. And this process of

amalgamation would be a progressive one. The terms that sufficed in

the condition of the simplest state of nature, or in a given latitude,

would vary with their varying habits, institutions and migrations. The

introduction of new objects and new ideas would require the invention

of new words, or what is much more probable, existing terms would be

modified or compounded to suit the occasion. No one who has paid much

attention to the subject, can have escaped noticing a confirmation

of this opinion, in the extreme readiness of our western Indians to

bestow, on the instant, names, and appropriate names—to any new object

presented to them. A readiness not attributable to their having at

command a stock of generic polysyllables—for these it would be very

awkward to wield—but as appears more probable, to the powers of the

syntax, which permits the resolution of new compounds from existing

roots, and often concentrates, as remarked in another place, the entire

sense of the parent words, upon a single syllable, and sometimes upon a

single letter.

Thus it is evident that the Chippewas possessed names for a living

tree _mittig_, and a string _aiâb_, before they named the bow

_mittigwâb_,—the latter being compounded under one of the simplest

rules from the two former. It is further manifest that they had named

earth _akki_, and (any solid, stony or metallic mass) _âbik_, before

they bestowed an appellation upon the kettle, _akkeek_, or _akkik_,

the latter being derivatives from the former. In process of time these

compounds became the bases of other compounds, and thus the language

became loaded with double and triple, and quadruple compounds, concrete

in their meaning and formal in their utterance.

When the introduction of the metals took place, it became necessary to

distinguish the clay from the iron pot, and the iron, from the copper

kettle. The original compound, _akkeek_, retained its first meaning,

admitting the adjective noun _piwâbik_ (itself a compound) iron,

when applied to a vessel of that kind, piwâbik akkeek, iron kettle.

But a new combination took place to designate the copper kettle,

_miskwâkeek_, red-metal kettle; and another expression to denote the

brass kettle, _ozawâbik akkeek_, yellow metal kettle. The former is

made up from miskôwâbik, copper (literally _red-metal_—from miskwâ,

red, and _âbik_, the generic above mentioned) and _akkeek_, kettle.

Ozawâbik, brass, is from _ozawâ_ yellow, and the generic _âbek_—the

term akkeek, being added in its separate form. It may, however, be

used in its connected form of wukkeek, making the compound expression

_ozawâbik wukkeek_.

In naming the horse paibâizhikôgazhi, i. e. the animal with solid

hoofs, they have seized upon the feature which most strikingly

distinguished the horse, from the cleft-footed animals which were

the only species known to them at the period of the discovery. And

the word itself affords an example, at once, both of their powers

of concentration, and brief, yet accurate description, which it may

be worth while to analyse. Paizhik, is one, and is also used as the

indefinite article—the only article the language possesses. This word

is further used in an adjective sense, figuratively indicating, united,

solid, undivided. And it acquires a plural signification by doubling,

or repeating the first syllable, with a slight variation of the second.

Thus, Pai-baizhik, denotes not _one_, or _an_, but several; and when

thus used in the context, renders the noun governed, plural. Oskuzh, is

the nail, claw, or horny part of the foot of beasts, and supplies the

first substantive member of the compound _gauzh_. The final vowel is

from _akwaisi_, a beast; and the marked o, an inseparable connective,

the office of which is to make the two members coalesce, and harmonize.

The expression thus formed becomes a substantive, specific in its

application. It may be rendered plural like the primitive nouns, may be

converted into a verb, has its diminutive, derogative and local form,

and in short, is subject to all the modifications of other substantives.

Most of the modern nouns are of this complex character. And they

appear to have been invented to designate objects, many of which were

necessarily unknown to the Indians in the primitive ages of their

existence. Others, like their names for a copper-kettle and a horse,

above mentioned, can date their origin no farther back than the period

of the discovery. Of this number of nascent words, are most of their

names for those distilled or artificial liquors, for which they are

indebted to Europeans. Their name for water, _neebi_, for the fat of

animals, _weenin_, for oil or grease, _pimmidai_, for broth, _nâbôb_,

and for blood, _miskwi_, belong to a very remote era, although all but

the first appear to be compounds. Their names for the tinctures or

extracts derived from the forest, and used as dyes, or medicines, or

merely as agreeable drinks, are mostly founded upon the basis of the

word _âbo_, a liquid, although this word is never used alone. Thus—

Shomin-âbo Wine From Shomin, a grape, âbo, a liquor.

Ishkodai-âbo Spirits From Ishkôdâi, fire, &c.

Mishimin-âbo Cider From Mishimin, an apple, &c.

Tôtôsh-âbo Milk From Tôtôsh, the female breast, &c.

Sheew-âbo Vinegar From Sheewun, sour, &c.

Annibeesh-âbo From Annibeeshun, leaves, &c.

Ozhibiegun-aubo From Ozhibiêgai, he writes, &c.

In like manner their names for the various implements and utensils

of civilized life, are based upon the word _Jeegun_, one of those

primitives, which, although never disjunctively used, denotes, in its

modified forms, the various senses implied by our words instrument,

contrivance, machine, &c. And by prefixing to this generic, a

substantive, verb, or adjective, or parts of one or each, an entire new

class of words is formed. In these combinations, the vowels e, and o,

are sometimes used as connectives.

Keeshkeebô-jeegun A saw From Keeshkeezhun, v. a. to cut.

Seeseebô-jeegun A file From Seesee, to rub off, &c.

Wassakoonen-jeegun A candle From Wassakooda, bright, biskoona, flame, &c.

Beeseebô-jeegun A coffee-mill From Beesâ, fine grains, &c.

Minnikwâd-jeegun A drinking vessel From Minnekwâi, he drinks, &c.

Tâshkeebôd-jeegun A saw mill From Taushkâ, to split, &c.

Mudwâiabeed-jeegun A violin From Mudwâwâi, sound, âiâb, a string, &c.

Sometimes this termination is shortened into _gun_, as in the following

instances.

Onâ-gun A dish.

Tikkina-gun A cradle.

Neeba-gun A bed.

Puddukkyi-gun A fork.

Puggimmâ-gun A war-club.

Opwâ-gun A pipe.

Wassâitshie-gun A window.

Wakkyi-gun A house.

Pôdahwâ-gun A fire-place.

Sheema-gun A lance.

Another class of derivatives is formed from _wyân_, indicating,

generally, an undressed skin. Thus—

Muk-wyân A bear skin From Mukwah, a bear, and wyaun, a skin.

Wazhusk-wyân A muskrat skin From Wazhusk, a muskrat, &c.

Wabôs-wyân A rabbit skin From Wabôs, a rabbit, &c.

Neegik-wyân An otter skin From Neegih, an otter, &c.

Ojeegi-wyân A fisher skin From Ojeeg, a fisher, &c.

Wabizhais-ewyân, a martin skin, from wabizhais, a martin, &c.

Wâbiwyan, a blanket, and bubbuggiwyan, a shirt, are also formed

from this root. As the termination _wyân_, is chiefly restricted to

undressed skins, or peltries, that of _waigin_, is, in like manner,

generally applied to dressed skins, or to cloths. Thus—

Monido-waigin Blue cloth, strouds From Monido, spirit, &c.

Misk-waigin Red cloth From Miskwâ, red, &c.

Nondâ-waigin Scarlet.

Peezhiki-waigin A buffalo robe From Peezhiki, a buffalo, &c.

Addik-waigin A cariboo skin From Addik, a cariboo, &c.

Ozhauwushk-waigin Green cloth From Ozhâwushkwâ, green.

An interesting class of substantives is derived from the third person

singular of the present indicative of the verb, by changing the

vowel sound of the first syllable, and adding the letter d to that

of the last, making the terminations in aid, âd, eed, id, ood. Thus,

Pimmoossâ, he walks, becomes pâmoossâd, a walker.

aid— Munnissai He chops Mânissaid A chopper.

Ozhibeigai He writes Wâzhibeigaid A writer.

Nundowainjeegai He hunts Nândowainjeegaid A hunter.

âd— Neebâ He sleeps Nâbâd A sleeper.

Kwâbahwâ He fishes } Kwyâbahwâd A fisher, }

(with scoop net) } (with scoop net.)}

Puggidowâ He fishes } Pâgidowâd A fisher, }

(with sein)} (with sein.)}

eed— Annokee He works Anokeed A worker.

Jeessakea He juggles Jossakeed A juggler.

Munnigobee He pulls bark Mainigobeed A bark puller.

id— Neemi He dances Nâmid A dancer.

Weesinni He eats Wâssinid An eater.

Pimâdizzi He lives Paimaudizzid A living being.

ood— Nugamoo He sings Naigumood A singer.

Keegido He speaks Kâgidood A speaker.

Keewonimoo He lies Kâwunimood A liar.

This class of words is rendered plural in ig,—a termination, which,

after d final in the singular, has a soft pronunciation, as if written

_jig_. Thus, Nâmid, a dancer, nâmidjig, dancers.

The derogative form is given to these generic substantives by

introducing ish, or simply sh, in place of the d, and changing

the latter to _kid_, making the terminations in ai, aishkid, in

â, âshkid, in e, eeshkid, in i, ishkid, and in oo, ooshkid. Thus,

naindowainjeegaid, a hunter, is changed to naindowainjeegaishkid, a bad

or unprofitable hunter. Naibâd, a sleeper, is changed to naibâshkid, a

sluggard. Jossakeed, a juggler, to jossakeeshkid, a vicious juggler.

Wâsinnid, an eater, to wâssinishkid, a gormandizer. Kâgidood, a

speaker, kâgidooshkid, a babbler. And in these cases the plural is

added to the last educed form, making kâgidooshkidjig, babblers, &c.

The word nittâ, on the contrary, prefixed to these expressions, renders

them complimentary. For instance, nittâ naigumood, is a fine singer,

nittâ kâgidood, a ready speaker, &c.

Flexible as the substantive has been shown to be, there are other forms

of combination that have not been adverted to—forms, by which it is

made to coalesce with the verb, the adjective, and the preposition,

producing a numerous class of compound expressions. But it is deemed

most proper to defer the discussion of these forms to their several

appropriate heads.

Enough has been exhibited to demonstrate its prominent grammatical

rules. It is not only apparent that the substantive possesses number,

and gender, but it also undergoes peculiar modifications to express

locality and diminution, to denote adjective qualities and to indicate

tense. It exhibits some curious traits connected with the mode of

denoting the masculine and feminine. It is modified to express person

and to distinguish living from inanimate masses. It is rendered

possessive by a peculiar inflection, and provides particles, under the

shape either of prefixes or suffixes, separable or inseparable, by

which the actor is distinguished from the object—and all this, without

changing its proper substantive character, without putting on the

aspect of a pseudo adjective, or a pseudo verb. Its changes to produce

compounds, are, however, its most interesting, its most characteristic

trait. Syllable is heaped upon syllable, word upon word, and derivative

upon derivative, until its vocabulary is crowded with long and pompous

phrases, most formidable to the eye.

So completely transpositive do the words appear, that like chessmen

on a board, their elementary syllables can be changed at the will of

the player, to form new combinations to meet new contingencies, so long

as they are changed in accordance with certain general principles and

conventional rules; in the application of which, however, much depends

upon the will or the skill of the player. What is most surprising—all

these changes and combinations, all these qualifications of the object,

and distinctions of the person, the time, and the place, do not

supersede the use of adjectives, and pronouns, and verbs, and other

parts of speech woven into the texture of the noun, in their elementary

and disjunctive forms.

2. A VOCABULARY OF WORDS AND PHRASES IN THE CHIPPEWA LANGUAGE.

A.

A. a. to express the sound of a, in father, ah in Jehovah. Amo, a

Bee.

A. â. “ “ “ “ a, in fall, au in auction, aw in law.

Tyâ, Lo!

A. a. “ “ “ “ a, in hat. Aki, Earth.

Ai. ai. “ “ “ “ a, in fate, ai, in aim, ay, in way, e,

in obey. Ais, a Shell.

A or An, Pai´zhik. (see one.)

To abash, v. Agud´ji.

Verbs are inserted in the most simple of their concrete forms,

being the third person singular of the indicative present, in all

cases where not otherwise expressed.

Abdomen, s. Omissud´.

See acorn for examples of the diminutive, derogative, and other

regular forms of the substantive.

Abed, ad. Nibâ´guning.

Local form of the word bed.

Abide thou, imp. mood. Abin´.

Able, a. Gushkitô´n.

As adjectives are declined with person and mood, they are inserted

under the same rule indicated for verbs.

Abode, s. Aindâd.

Aboard, ad. Pindô´nug.

Aborigines, s. Unishinâ´bai. (Plural in g.)

Above, prep. Ogidjy´ei.

Above, ad. Ishpiming.

Local form of the adjective high.

Above ground, Ogidâ´kumig.

Abroad, ad. Kood´uging.

Abcess, s. Minwi´wi.

To abscond, v. Ozhimoo´.

Absent, a. Ondain´di.

To abound, v. inan. Wâ´nadud.

To abound, v. an. Wâ´nadizzi.

To accept, v. Odâ´pinun.

Accepter, s. Wai´dâpinung.

To accompany, v. Owi´jiewân.

Accompanier, s. Wa´jiewaid.

To accost, v. Kunôzh´.

Account, to make an account, v. Muzziny´igai.

Accounter, s. Muzziny´igaid.

Account book, s. Muzziny´igun.

(See Book.)

To accuse, v. Una´modum.

Accuser, s. Ain´amodung.

Acid, a. Shi´wun.

Acid liquor, Shiwunâ´bo.

Acorn, s. Mittigomin.

Acorn, s. dim. Mittigominais, equivalent little acorn.

Acorn, s. der. Mittigôminish, eq. bad acorn.

Acorn, s. lo. Mittigomining, eq. in the acorn.

Acorn, s. dim. & der. Mittigominaisish, eq. little bad acorn.

Acorn, s. dim. der. & lo. Mittigominaisishing, eq. in the little bad

acorn.

Acquaintance, s. Kaikain´imind.

One who is known.

Across, ad. Azhiwyei.

To act, v. Tô´dum.

Action, s. Tôdumowin.

Actor, s. Aindô´dung.

Active, a. inan. Kizhinzhow´ita.

Active, a. an. Kizhinzowizzi.

Adder, s. Kinai´bik.

Adder, s. dim. Kinaibikons.

Adder, s. der. Kinaibikish.

Adder, s. lo. Kinaibiking.

Adder, s. dim. & der. Kinaibikonsish.

Adder, s. dim. der. & lo. Kiniabikonsishing.

Adder’s tongue, a plant, Mônawing.

E. dens canis.

Address, s. Kigidô´win.

Addresser, s. Kâgidood´.

To adhere, v. Agookai´.

To adopt, v. Wangô´ma.

An adopted person, Wyangô´mind.

Adopter, s. Wyangôn´gaid.

To adore, v. Annamiâ´.

This word is exclusively applied to christian worship.

Adorer, s. Ainnamiâd´.

To adorn, v. Sussai´ga.

Adroit, a. Minwi.

Adrift, ad. Waiba´tun.

To advance, v. Pida´simôsai.

Advancer, s. Pada´simôsaid.

To adventure, v. Ienâdizzi.

Adventurer, s. Aienâdizzid.

To advise, v. Kuggi´kwai.

Advice, s. Kuggikwai´win.

Adviser; s. Kaiggi´kwaid.

Adult, s. Kizhigi.

Adultery, s. Kimô´jeiddiwin.

Afar, ad. Wa´suh.

Affable, a. Ona´nigooni.

Affectionate, a. Gizhawâ´dizzi.

Affection, s. Gizhawâ´dizziwin.

Afloat, Waiba´tun.

Afore, prep. Nigan´.

Aforetime, ad. Maiwinzk´uh.

Afraid, a. Sai´gizzi.

After, prep. Ish´kwaiyong.

Afternoon, Una´gooshi,

Again, ad. Min´awâ.

Aged, a. Appi´tizzi.

Age, s. Appi´tizziwin.

Agréeable, a. Minwaindâ´goozzi.

Agreeableness, s. Minwaindâ´goozziwin.

Agriculture, s. Gittigai´win.

Agriculturist, s. Gait´tigaid.

Ah, interj. Tyâ.

Ahead, Nigan. (See Before.)

To aid, v. Widôkazoo.

Aider, s. Wadôkazood.

To ail, v. Akooz´zi.

Ailment, s. Akooz´ziwin.

To aim, v. Odozhiân.

Aimer, s. Wyaizhiewaid.

Air, a soft breeze, s. Ayâ´.

Air, wind, s. Nôdin.

Alarm, s. Sassa´kwaiwin.

To alarm, v. Sasa´kwai.

Alarmer, s. Syâsa´kwaid.

Alder, s. Waddôp´.

Alder, s. dim. Waddôpons.

Alder, s. der. Waddôpish.

Alder, s. lo. Waddôping.

Alder, s. dim. der. & lo. Waddôponsishing.

Alike, ad. Tib´ishkô.

Aliment, s. Mi´jim.

Alive, a. Pimâdizzi.

All, a. Kukin´uh.

Alliance, s. Inuhwain´diwin.

To allot, v. Oonaô´ki.

Allotment, s. Oonaô´kiwin.

Allotter, s. Wainaôkeed.

To allure, v. Shôbiewai.

Almond, s. Pugân´.

Almost, ad. Kai´go.

To give alms, v. Shaiwainingai.

Alms, s. Shaiwainingaiwinun.

This substantive phrase, which is rendered plural in _un_, and this

being a plural of inanimate bodies, is thereby shown to be things

given, is based on the verb to pity.

Almsgiver, s. Shaiwamingaid.

Along shore, Tiddibaiw´.

Alone, a. Nizhik´ai.

Already, ad. Pabigai´.

Also, ad. Gyai´.

To alter, v. inanimate, Anjitôn´.

Alterer, s. Ianjitôd´.

Altercation, s. Iâsiminid´aiwug.

This is a plural expression indicating a personal tumult; a hubbub.

Always, ad. Moozh ug.

Am, I am, Nin, Dyâ. See to be.

Amen, ad. Kunnagai´kunna.

Amidst, prep. inanimate, Nasowiei.

Amidst the town, or village, Nasowôdainuh.

Ammunition, s. Pashkizzigaiwin.

This is one of the comparatively modern compounds, being based on

the verb to fire, which see. It is made a substantive in _win_.

Ample, a. mai’tshâ.

To amuse, v. Oombukumigi´zzi.

Amusement, s. ————win.

Amuser, s. Waibukumigizzid.

An, art. Pai´zhik.

Ancestor, s. Ogitizimun.

And, conj. Gyai.

Andiron, s. Shaigwukinzhaiegun.

Angry, a. Nishkâdizzi.

Anger, s. Nishkâdizziwin.

Anguish, s. Wisugain´dum, a compound from the words _bitter_ and

_mind_.

Animal, s. Awais´i.

Animate substantives have their plural in g.

Ankle, s. Obikoo´guna.

Annually, ad. Aindasopibôn.

To annoint, v. Nominun.

Anointer, s. Naiminiwaid.

Another, a. Bukan´.

To answer, v. Nuhkoodum.

Answer, s. Nuhkoodumowin.

Ant, s. Ainigo´.

— s. dim, ——os.

— s. der, ——oosh.

— der. local, ——ooshing.

Antler, s. Aish´kun.

— s. dim. ——ais.

— s. der. ——ish.

— s. loc. ——ing.

— s. dim. & der. ——ainsish.

— s. dim. der. loc. ——ainsishing.

Anus, s. Ojeed.

Apparel, s. Pasikumingin. Plural.

Apparition, s. Ji´by. Plu. in _ug_.

—— s. dim. —— ais.

To appear, v. Nâgoozzi.

To applaud, v. Mumikwa´zhowai.

Applause, s. —— win.

Applauser, s. Maimikwazhowaid.

Apple, s. Mishi´min. Plu. in ug.

—— s. dim. ——ais.

—— a. der. ——ish.

—— s. dim & der. ——aisish.

—— s. loc. ——ing.

Apple tree, Mishi´minâ´tig.

Apple liquor, Mishi´minâ´bo. See cider.

To approach, v. Piezha.

Approacher, s. Puhizhad.

April, s. Paibokâidagiming Gizis.

Archer, s. Ainuhaid.

Ardent spirits. See Brandy.

To arise from lying posture, Onish´ka.

To arise from a sitting posture, Puzzigwi.

Arm, of the body, Onik´.

Arms, weapons, Oshwi´winun. Plu.

Armband, s. Gitchi´waibizzoon.

Around, ad. Kiwitâ´jei.

To arrive, by land, Tak´wishin.

To arrive, by water, Miz´hugâ.

Arrow, blunt headed, Bik´wuk.

Arrow, spear pointed, Ussowân´.

Art, thou art, Ki Dyâ.

Artichoke, s. Ushkibwâ´.

Ash tree, s. Wisugâk´. Bitterwood.

Ashes, s. Pingwi´. This word is without number.

Ashamed, a. Agudji.

To ascend, v. Ukwan´dowai.

Ashore, put ashore, Kikubâ.

Ashore, near the shore, Chigâ´bik.

To ask, v. Kugwai dwai.

Asker, s. Kai´gwaidwaid.

Aspect, of things animate, Aizhinâ´goozzi.

Aspect, of things inanimate, Aizhinâ´gwuk.

Aspen, s. Aizâ´di.

Assassin, s. Naizhiwaid.

Assemblage, s. Mamawiedding.

Assent, s. Nuh koodum.

To assent, v. E kido.

To assist, v. Widôkâ´zoo.

Assistant, s. Waidokâ´zood.

At, prep. Cheeg.

Atmosphere, s, Gi´zhig.

Atom, s. Bâpish.

To attack, v. Mow´inai.

To attain, v. Gushkiai´wizzi.

Attainment, s. ——win.

Attire, s. See apparel.

Avaricious, a. Suzzai gizzi.

Avarice, s. —— win.

To avenge, v. Azhitow´iewai.

Avenger, s. Iazhitowiewaid.

August, s. Monô´mini, Gizis. Rice Moon.

Aunt, uncle’s wife, or father’s sister, Nizhigwoos´.

Aunt, mother’s sister. Ninwishai´.

Aurora borealis, Jiby nimi iddiwug. Dancing ghosts.

Autumn, s. Tagwâ gi.

Next autumn, Tagwâgig´.

Last autumn, Tagwâgoong´.

To authorize, v. Inugimâ´.

Authority, s. ——win.

Awake, a. Gooshkooz´zi.

Away, ad. Ningood´ji.

Awkward, a. Namu´nji.

Awl, s. Migôs´.

—— s. dim. —— ais.

—— s. der. —— ish.

—— s. local, —— ing.

—— s. dim. & der. —— aisish.

—— s. dim. der. & loc. —— aisishing.

Axe, s. Wagâ´kwut.

—— s. dim. —— ais.

—— s. der. —— ish.

—— s. local, —— ing.

—— s. dim. & der. —— aisish.

—— s. dim. der. & loc. —— aisishing.

B.

To babble, v. Ozâmidôn, or Kâgidooshkai.

Babble, s. Ozâmidôniwin, or Kâgidooshkaiwin.

Babbler, s. Kâgidooshkid.

Babe, baby, Abbinôji.

This is the term for child. A _male_ child is usually denominated

Pinai´shi, (bird,) during its infancy.

Bachelor, s. Pizhishigôwizzi.

This term being in the animate form, is not indicative of sex, and

strictly indicates an unmarried, (or uncoupled) person.

Back, s. Opik´wun.

Backbone, s. Tuttagâ´gwun.

Backwards, ad. Uzhai.

To step backwards, v. Uzhaigâ´bôwi.

Bacon, s. Kôkôsh Wiôs. Hog flesh.

Bad, a. animate, Mud ji.

— a. inanimate, Monâ´dud.

Badger, s. Missukâkud´jish.

Bag, s. Mush´kimoot.

— s. dim, —— ais.

— s. dim & der, —— aisish.

— s. local, —— ong. Implying in the bag.

Bait, for animals, Mijimikunjigun.

Balance, s. Tibâbishkôjigun.

A compound derivative from the words _equal_, _cord_, and

_instrument_.

Baldheaded, Wâshkain´dibai.

Bald Eagle, Wabizhuk´wai.

Ball, metallic, Unwi´.

— wooden, Pikwâ´kwut.

Balsam of fire tree, Shingooban´dug.

Balsam, s. Pigiuan´dug.

Band, s. Pizoon´.

Banner, s. Kikiwai´aoon.

Bank of earth, Ishpakum´iga.

Bandy legged, Wawushkigâ´dai.

To baptise, v. Siginun´dowâ.

Bare, (in body,) a. Pingwashâ´giddi.

Barge, or boat, s. Millig´ôchiman, or Nabug´ôchiman.

Any vessel intermediate in size and mode of construction, between

a bark canoe and a ship. The first term is a derivative from tree

and canoe, the second, from _plank_ or _board_, and canoe.

To bark, v. Migih´.

This is a generic word for barking. The eagle derives its name from

this word.

Bark, of the birch tree, Wig´wos.

Bark, of the bass, Wigood.

Bark, of any other species, Wunagaik´.

Bark dish, s. Onâ´gon.

Applied to crockery.

Bark sap dish, Nimibâ´gun.

Bark box, s. Mukkuk´.

Applied to any box, trunk, barrel, &c. also with a prefix, to a

coffin.

Bashful, a. Bakâdizzi.

Basin, s. Onâgon.

——, s. dim. Onâgons

Other terminations regular.

Basket, s. Wadub´imukkuk´.

A derivative from the word for cedar root, and box. Diminutive in

ons.

Bass tree, s. Wigoobimizh.

A derivative from base bark, and the generic for plants.

Bat, s. Apukwunaji.

Battle, s. Migâ´diwin.

Battle field, Katapin´uniding.

Battle club, Pugamâ´gun.

To bathe, v. Pugizzoo.

Bay, s. Wikwaid´.

— s. dim.——ôns.

To bawl, v. Mowi´.

Bayonet, s. Shimâ´gun.

— s. dim. Shimâgons´.

— s. der. Shimâ´ganish.

This is the term for soldier.

— s. lo. Shimâguning.

Duplications of these terminations as in other nouns.

To be, v. s. Iâ.

Beach, s. Sheezhodaiw.

Bead, s. Minais.

This is the diminutive form of berry, which see.

Beak, or bill, s. Okôzh´.

The term for hog, appears to be a derivative from this and the verb

lo cut.

Bean, s. Miskôdi´simin.

This is manifestly a description of the bean that bears a red

flower, but the word has become generic.

Bear, s. Mukwa´.

— s. dim. Mukôns´. A cub.

— s. dim. & der. Mukons´ish. A bad cub.

Bear skin, Mukwy´an.

Bear’s meat, Mukôwias.

Bear’s oil, Mukôpimi´dai.

Bear’s paw, Mukôzid.

Beard, s. Mizhidonâ´gon.

Beast, a quadruped, Awai´si.

To beat, v. an. Pukitai´. To beat him.

— v. inan. Pukitaiun´. To beat it.

Beau, s. Mumundâ´ginin´i. A fine, or gay dressed, man.

Beaver, s. Amik´.

— s. dim. ——ôns.

Derogative, in ish, local, in ing. &c.

Beaver dam, Amikoweezh.

Beaver skin, Abim´inikwai.

Beaver robe, Muttatos´.

This was an article formerly worn, but now seldom seen. It consists

of from six to ten finely dressed skins, sewed together. The word,

if a compound, does not appear to have reference to a modern era.

Beaver, paired in rutting time, Pukai´mik. Plural in ôg.

Beaver, in lodge in rutting time, Amun´amik. Plural in ôg.

Beautiful, a. an. Bishigaindâ´goozzi. A beautiful person.

—— a. inan. Bishigaindâ´gwud. A beautiful object.

Bed, s. Nibâ´gun.

— s. dim. Nibâgons.

— s. lo. Nibâgunish. Implying in or on the bed.

Bedstead, s. Nibâgunâk.

Bedbug, s. Nibâ´gunnimonitôs´. Bed insect.

Bees, s. A´mo. Plural in g.

Beehive, s. Amowuziswun.

Beech tree, s. Ozhawaimizh.

Beef, s. Wi´ôs.

Before, prep. Nigan´.

To Beg, v. See to ask.

There is no word of the precise meaning of beg.

To beget, v. Odônijanisinun.

To begin, begin, thou, Ki nit´tum.

Beginning, in, or at the beginning, Wyaish´kud.

Begone, interj. Awuss. To dogs.

Behave, be quiet, Pizzan´.

Behaviour, s. Izhiwai´bizziwin.

To behead, v. Okeeshkigwaiwân.

Behead thou, imp. Keeshkigwai.

Behind, prep. Agâwy´ei.

Behind the house, Agâwi´gumig.

Behind the tree, Agâwâ´tig.

Behind the hill, Agâwudjoo´.

Behold, interj. Tyâ´.

To believe, v. Taibwai´tum.

Belief, s. ——owin.

Bell, horse or cow bell, Shinowaiô´jigun.

Bell, church bell, Gittôtâ´gun.

Belle, s. Mamundâgikwai. Fine, or gay dressed woman.

To bellow, v. Nôndâ´goozzi, or Muzzitâ´goozzi.

These words are not strictly an equivalent for bellow. They

indicate also the sounds uttered by all quadrupeds, except the dog,

and hence imply to bleat, to neigh, to bray, &c.

Bellows, s. Pôdadishkôdawân.

A derivative from the word to blow, and fire.

Belly, s. Omissud´.

Below, prep. Nisye´ei.

Below the earth, Nisâ ki.

Below stream, Nisâ´jiwun.

Below the tree, Nisâ´tig.

Belt, s. Pizoon´.

To bend, v. an. Wâgin´.

—— v. inan. Wâginun.

Bend of a river, Pukai´gumâ.

To bend the bow, v. Nabâ bishim.

A derivative from cord, &c.

Beneath, prep. Unamye´i.

Beneath the ground, Unumâ´kumig.

Benevolent, a. Gizhiwâ´dizzi.

Benevolence, s. ——win.

Berry, s. inan. Min. Meen.

A primitive word. It takes the usual terminations. Plural in _un_.

Beside, prep. See by, at.

To bestow, v. imp. Mizh.

Between, prep. Nasowye´ei.

Between the trees, Nasowâ´tig.

Between the rocks, Nasowâ´bik.

Between the buildings, Nasowakyi´gun.

To bewail, v. Mowi´.

To bewitch, v. Ogimidaikundawân.

To bewitch, v. t. Kimidaikundawâ.

Beyond, prep. Aishkwaitaig.

Beyond the place, Aishkwaising.

Beyond yonder, Awuss´wai´dai.

Beyond the mark, (in shooting) Kiunnicuibidai

Bifid, a. Tâshkôshkunzhi.

Split hoof. Der. from split and hoof.

Bifurcated, a. Nâzhoshtigwong.

Two headed. Der. from two and head.

Big, a. ânim. Mindidô´.

Big, a. inanim Maitshâ, or Mitshâ.

Bile, s. Wi´zoob.

Bill, s. Okôzh´.

Billow, s. Ti´goo.

To bind, v. infin. Tidibupi.

To bind, v. an. infin. Tidibupizh, bind him or her.

—— v. inan. “ Tidibupidôn, bind it.

Biped, Nizhogâ´dai. Two legged.

Derivative from two and leg.

Birch tree, Wigwasâtig, bark wood.

Birch bark, Wigwas.

Birch bark canoe, Chimân´.

Diminutive in _ais_, derogative in _ish_, local in _ing_.

Bird, s. Pinai´si. Plural in _wug_.

— s. dim. Pinaishains.

— s. dim. &. der. —— ish.

— s. local. —— ing.

— s. dim. der. & loc. Pinaishain. sishing.

Bird’s nest, Pinai´siwuziswun´.

Bird’s foot, Pinai´wizid.

Birth, Undâ´dizzi.

Bison, s. Pizhik´i.

Applied also to the domestic cow.

—— s. dim. Pizhikins´. Calf.

To bite, v. an. Takwum. To bite him or her.

—— v. inan. Takwundun. To bite it.

Biter, s. Taikwungaid.

Bitter, a. an. Wisugizzi´.

— a. inan. Wisugun´.

Bittern, s. Mushkowizzi. Marsh bird.

Bitch, s. Kiskishai´.

Black, a. animàte, Muk´kudaiwizzi´.

—— a. inanimate, Muk´kudaiwâ´.

Blacksmith, s. Awish´twiâ.

Blacksmith’s shop, —— wigumig.

Blackberry, s. Duttogâ´gomin.

Blackbird, s. Ossig´inok. The true species.

Wâb Ossiginok, spotted head, small.

Bwoin Ossiginok, red wing.

Mukkudai Pinais, a generic, vaguely applied.

Blackman, s. Mukkudai´ Wios. Black flesh.

Black Eagle, Ininun´zi.

Black duck, Mukkudaishib.

Black rock, Mukkudaiwâbikud.

To blacken, v. an. Mukkudairohi.

—— v. inan. Mukkudaiwatôn.

Bladder, s. Omô´di. Applied also to bottle, which see.

Blanket, s. Wâbiwyan´. A derivative from white & skin, or robe.

Blast of wind, Puguma´nimud.

To blaze, v. Biskâ´koonai.

Blaze, s. Biskoonai.

To bleat, v. Nôndâgoozzi. See bellow.

To bleed with a lancet, Pashkik-wai´egai.

Blind, a. Kuggibin´gwai.

To blindfold, v. Kuggibingwain.

To blister, v. a. Ubishkwaibigizzi. To blister by medical means.

To blister, v. ina. Ubishkwaibigud. To blister by work, fire, &c.

Block, s. Gishkigy´igun.

Blood, s. Miskwi´.

Bloody, a. Miskwi´wi.

Bloodsucker, s. Suguskwâ´jimai.

Blossom, s. Wâ´bigoon.

To blow, v. an. Pôdâzh´.

—— v. ina. Pôdâ´dun.

Blue, a. Ozhâ´wushkwâ.

Blue sky, Mizhâ´kwut.

Blue water, Ozha´wushkwâgumi.

Blue bird, s. Oshâ´wun.

To blush, v. Miskwingwaisi.

Board, a board, s. Nabug´sug.

To boast, v. Wowizhâ´jimoo.

Boaster, s. Waiwizhâjimood.

Boat, s. See barge.

Boatmen, rowers, Aizhaibwiai´jig. Plural.

Boatmen, paddlers, Chaimai´jig. Plural.

Body, s. Ow?

Ni ow, my body.

Ki ow, thy body.

Wi ow, his, or her body.

Bog, s. Mushkig´.

Bogberry, Mushki´gimin. The cranberry.

To boil, v. an. Oonzoo´. To boil him.

To boil, v. in. Oondai´. To boil it.

To boil the kettle, Kizhâ´gumiz.

Bold, a. Sôngidaiai.

Bondman, s. Apâni´ni.

Bondwoman, s. Apânikwai´.

Bone, s. Okun´.

Bone awl, Namung´.

Book, s. Muzziny´igun.

Book, s. dim, Muzziny´gons.

Book, s. dim & der, Muzziny´gonsish.

Book, s. local, Muzziny´guning.

Book, s. dim, der, & loc, Muzziny´gonsishing.

To book, v. Muzziny´igai.

Narrative of an Expedition Through the Upper Mississippi to Itasca Lake, the Actual Source of This River Embracing an Exploratory Trip Through the St. Croix and Burntwood (or Broule) Rivers · 第 13 / 15 章