HEREDITY

So we come to a consideration of temperament, and Burton cites

instances, new to some, old as the hills to others. First he quotes

Bacon, saying: “Where the complexion of the father is corrupt, there

the complexion and constitution of the son must needs be corrupt, and

so the corruption is derived from the father to the son.” The which

Moses, and many others, taught generations before. Yet it is a truth

constantly lost sight of, as constantly re-discovered. Indeed it seems

to those who have accepted it, so true as almost to be platitudinous.

Almost it would seem that we might accept the truth of heredity as we

accept the truth that 7×7=49. But not so. I pick up Dr. Strahan’s book

_Suicide and Insanity_ to find a passage in which he tells us that

several distinguished writers have, by carefully following the family

history of suicides, been able to demonstrate how frequently suicide

runs in families. “This has been shown by these authorities to occur

with alarming frequency, yet it only touches upon one form of heredity,

the direct, in which heredity is only admitted in those cases where

the abnormal character is identical in both ancestor and descendant.”

Again, in another place: “... we must not confine the term ‘heredity’

to suicides who have had suicidal relations, but to most of those among

whose relatives we discover insanity, epilepsy, idiocy, scrofula and

the like.” Which is very well, but we go to old Burton for something

else. For the old writer, his nose close to the trail, dares and

dares greatly, rising far above considerations of sentimentality and

considering ways to mend matters. He gathers his data, looks at it,

arranges it, studies it and sees that diseased people should not be

allowed to contaminate the race and increase suffering and misery

by propagating unfitness. He looks on mankind from a height, as it

were, just as a chicken breeder looks at his birds. This cock has an

imperfect comb, therefore off goes his head. We want no imperfect

combs. This hen is improperly barred and this chick is what is called

“smutty,” then to the chopping block with them!

More than that, for he perceives what many of our modern legislators

and fanatics and imitation patriots refuse to see--that a people which

has not injected new blood, will degenerate. You stop immigration

in any nation and you make for weakness, not strength. “In all ages

there should be ... once in 600 years, a transmigration of nations, to

amend and purify their blood, as we alter seed upon our lands, and ...

there should be, as it were, an inundation of those northern Goths and

Vandals, and many such like people which came out of that continent of

Scandia, and Sarmatia ... and over ran as a deluge, most part of Europe

and Africa, to alter for our good our complexions, which were much

defaced with hereditary infirmities, which by our lust and intemperance

we had contracted.”

Per contra, Burton would have had something to say in regard to

deportations and those who, in hysterical days, might have stood more

than a fair chance to be thrust oceans away, those in many cases whose

works might have “amended and purified.” Small chance would Percy

Bysshe Shelley have stood to stay with us; nor Edmund Burke; nor Oliver

Cromwell; and W. S. Gilbert would have stood on dangerous ground;

perhaps too William Morris, and certainly Shaw, and Tolstoy, and

Kropotkine, and Ruskin, and Hobbes of the _Leviathan_, and John Stuart

Mill, and Auberon Herbert, and Lord Byron, while Mr. Sumner would have

had Bobbie Burns in trouble in no time. And certainly, Burton would be

far from welcomed by the K. K. K.

Again: “So many ways,” writes Burton, “are we plagued and punished

for our fathers’ defaults,” then goes on to complain, as our students

and teachers of eugenics complain, that a man will not rear a bull or

horse “except he be right shapen in all parts, or permit him to cover

a mare, except he be well assured of his breed,” yet, in the raising

of children we take no heed. He quotes Boethius, who, writing of old

Scotland, declared that “if any were visited with the falling sickness,

madness, gout, leprosy, or any such dangerous disease, which was likely

to be propagated from the father to the son, he was instantly gelded;

a woman kept from all company of men; and if by chance, having some

such disease, she were found to be with child, she and her child were

buried alive.” Burton ponders over that, then declares himself all

for prevention of the propagation of the unfit in the interests of

humanity. Says he near the end of his rumination, “A severe doom, you

will say, and not to be used among Christians, yet more to be looked

into than it is. For now, by our too much facility in this kind, in

giving away for all to marry that will, too much liberty and indulgence

in tolerating all sorts, there is a vast confusion of hereditary

disease, no family secure, no man almost free from some grievous

infirmity or other. When no choice is had, but still the eldest must

marry, as so many stallions of the race; or if rich, they be fooled

by dizzards, lame or maimed, unable, intemperate, dissolute, exhaust

through riot ... they must be wise and able by inheritance; it comes

to pass that our generation is corrupt, we may have many weak persons,

both in body and mind, many feral diseases raging amongst us, crazed

families, _parentes peremptores_, (our fathers the cause of our ruin),

our fathers bad, and we are likely to be worse.” Burton and Havelock

Ellis, you see, stretch hands across the ages. The old timer is very

much akin to the modern eugenist.

The trouble is, and Burton saw it, that while we may realize that our

descendants may pay the penalty for disobeying those principles of the

universe, obedience to which makes for health, we are entirely without

thought for our unborn children and their children’s children. When

pleasure offers, all else is nowhere at all. Indeed, by his very nature

man can have no care for that which does not exist, and he no more

thinks with affection of future generations which may proceed from his

own loins, than he thinks with affection of his remote ancestors that

wallowed in the slime.

The gist of Burton's Anatomy of melancholy · 第 9 / 13 题