THE WEDDING AT CANA

Veronese has treated this subject twice. Accordingly the picture in

the Louvre must not be confounded with that of the same name in the

Brera museum at Milan. In spite of the value of the latter, it bears

no comparison to the gigantic canvas in the national museum of France.

[Illustration: PLATE V.--THE FAMILY OF DARIUS

(In the National Gallery, London)

This picturesque painting is one of the most curious of all Veronese's

works. It was painted in return for the hospitality which he received

from the Pisani family, and all the figures in it are portraits of

members of the household. Another point worthy of note is the

anachronism of the warriors clad in Roman armour standing before the

kneeling women, who are dressed in the manner of the sixteenth

century.]

This picture of the _Wedding at Cana_ was painted by Veronese for the

refectory of the convent of San Giorgio Maggiore, on the island that

faces the _Riva dei Schiavoni_. It remained there until the time of

Napoleon's Italian Campaign. Bonaparte, who loved the arts without

understanding them, laid profane hands on the great majority of

Italian masterpieces. This painting by Veronese was one of the number,

and found a place in the Louvre. The treaty of 1815 obliged France to

restore these treasures, but the Austrian commissioners, appointed to

accomplish the restitution, became alarmed at the difficulties of

transportation which the _Wedding at Cana_ presented. They accordingly

consented to exchange this canvas for a painting by Le Brun, _The

Feast at the House of the Pharisee_. Veronese's masterpiece remained

in the Louvre, in which it is one of the most flawless gems.

The contract drawn up between Veronese and the Prior of San Giorgio

Maggiore for the execution of this picture has been preserved. The

painter bound himself to deliver it within a year, since the contract

was signed June 6, 1562 and the delivery of the canvas took place of

September 8, 1563. He was to be furnished with canvas and colours, to

be entitled to take his meals at the convent and receive a cask of

wine as additional recompense. As to remuneration for his work, it was

fixed by mutual agreement at 324 ducats, which, in the 16th century,

corresponded to 972 francs in the coin of France. Taking into

consideration the enhanced value of money since that epoch, these 972

francs would represent to-day 7,000 francs. Such is the price which

the greatest artist of his time received for a masterpiece which

to-day commands the admiration of the entire world.

Never did Veronese display so much brilliance, dispense so much

imagination as in the _Wedding at Cana_; never did he show a greater

dexterity in execution; for, however considerable the dimensions of

the canvas may be, it demanded nothing less than genius to distribute

without clash or disproportion the hundred and thirty-two personages

which compose it. A painter less thoroughly sure of himself would have

made a sorry mess of this Feast; Veronese has produced a composition

that is admirable for its balance, in abounding charming details, and

unexpected and picturesque episodes, that do not in the least detract

from the effect of the painting as a whole.

On this picture, as on so many others from the brush of Veronese, one

cannot, as has already been said, pass an equitable judgment, unless

one accepts, without question, the master's method. Veronese had no

more respect for religious tradition than he had for mythological

legend. To take issue with the incongruities and anachronisms of the

_Wedding at Cana_, is voluntarily to debar oneself from discussing it.

If historic exactitude is the one thing that counts in a painting,

then this picture simply does not exist. But happily painting has no

need to justify itself to history; it is amply sufficient to itself,

without borrowing anything from history, and loses nothing of its

beauty if perchance it does violence to history. And of this the

_Wedding at Cana_ furnishes a most eloquent proof.

The composition of this famous picture is well known. Jesus is seated

in the middle focus, at the centre of the table, which is curved on

each side in the form of a horse-shoe. To fill this immense table,

Veronese did not go to the scriptures in search of personages; he drew

them from his surroundings and from his own imagination.

The groom, a handsome, black bearded young man, clad in purple and

gold, is no other than Alphonso d'Avalos, Marquis del Vasto, and the

bride is a portrait of Eleanora of Austria, sister of Charles V., and

Queen of France. On the left, one discovers, with some surprise,

Francis I., Charles V., the Sultan Achmed II., and Queen Mary of

England. Beside the Sultan is a woman richly robed and holding a

tooth-pick; she is Vittoria Colonna, Marchesa di Pescara; then,

further on are monks, cardinals, and personal friends of the artist.

Standing up, clad in brocade and holding a cup in his hand, is

Veronese's brother, Benedetto Caliari. In the centre are a group of

musicians. The octogenarian bending over his viol, is a portrait of

Titian; Bassano is playing the flute; Tintoretto and Veronese himself

draw their bow across the strings of a 'cello.

The success of the _Wedding at Cana_ was triumphal. The great painters

of Venice, contemporaries of Veronese, overwhelmed him with proofs of

their admiration; even morose Tintoretto found some extremely amiable

words in which to praise his rival in fame, and Titian embraced the

happy painter when he chanced to meet him in the city streets.

These praises were merited; the _Wedding at Cana_ is quite truly one

of the most beautiful masterpieces in the world's collection of

paintings.

The renown obtained by this admirable work brought Veronese a host of

orders. The various cities vied with each other to secure him to

decorate their churches or their convents. His first patron, the Prior

Torlioni, ordered a picture from him for the convent of San

Sebastiano, the church of which he had already decorated. Veronese, by

no means ungrateful, painted for him the _Feast at the House of the

Leper_, in 1570; three years later he painted for the dominican

monastery of San Giovanni e Paolo the _Feast at the House of Levi_, to

decorate one side of the refectory. The monks had only a modest sum at

their disposal and tremblingly offered it to the now celebrated

painter; they naïvely added the donation of a few casks of wine.

Veronese exhibited the most complete disinterestedness by accepting

these humble offers of the Prior. This was his third _Feast_.

The fourth, known under the name of the _Feast at the House of Simon

the Pharisee_, was executed for the refectory of the Brotherhood of

Servites. It represents Magdalen on her knees, wiping the feet of

Christ with her hair. This painting now hangs in the Louvre, opposite

the _Wedding at Cana_. It has been the property of France for two

centuries, and the history of its acquisition by Louis XIV is curious

enough to be worth the telling. Colbert, having learned that Spain had

negotiated for the purchase of the _Feast at the House of Simon_,

resolved to go to any lengths in order to acquire it himself, on

behalf of Louis XIV. The French ambassador to Venice, Pierre de Bonzi,

was charged with the negotiations. To address himself directly to the

Servites was impossible, since there was a law in the Venetian

Republic forbidding the sale and exportation of any native works of

art. Bonzi pursued the course of informing the Signoria of his royal

master's wish. The Signoria, desirous of securing the good will of the

great king, without violating her own laws, purchased with public

funds the picture from the Servites, and straightway offered it to

Louis XIV, who returned warm thanks to his "very dear and great

friends, allies and confederates, after having seen this rare and most

perfect original."

Veronese · 第 21 / 37 题