Chapter VIII, C. P. C. an invaluable weapon against “bullies” and other

bad characters of the same type, whom it was inexpedient or impossible

to charge with an offence under the Penal Code; and the Magistrates

showed no objection whatever to supporting the action of the police in

such cases. Thus for three years a very wholesome check was placed upon

this deplorable traffic, at a time when there was little articulate

Indian opinion to support the activity of the Commissioner. It was not

till twelve or thirteen years later that the Indian Government was

invited to consider Bills introduced by non-official Indian members of

the Legislature, designed to check or suppress both the immigration of

European unfortunates and the _swadeshi_ traffic in minor Indian girls.

Mr. Kennedy’s personal activities during the earlier months of his

Commissionership were to some extent reminiscent of the methods of Mr.

Forjett. He is said to have sometimes assumed a disguise—the full-dress

of an Arab or the _burka_ or covering of a Musalman _pardah-nashin_,—and

thus attired to have wandered about the city after nightfall in company

with one of his agents. He would pay surprise visits in this way to

various police-stations and _chaukis_, in order to discover at first

hand what sort of work his European and native officers were doing;

and all ranks learned to fear the consequences of their negligence or

other shortcomings being discovered by the Commissioner and performed

their duties with greater caution and zeal. He made himself feared by

the evil-doer and the lazy, who tried occasionally to forestall him by

obtaining previous information of his nocturnal visitations. They met,

however, with little success; the Commissioner was more than a match

for them. These constant surprise visits during 1899 and 1900 enabled

him to keep his finger on the pulse of the city and to checkmate the

criminal on several occasions. During the greater part of his term of

office, however, an injury to one of his ankles, which produced a limp,

practically deprived him of the power to pass unnoticed in disguise.

The lower classes thenceforth knew him as _Langada Kandi Saheb_, i.e.

‘the lame Mr. Kennedy’, and he is thus spoken of to this day by the old

law-breakers and disreputables who recollect his efforts to bring them to

book.

Short as was his tenure of the Commissioner’s appointment, Mr. Kennedy

managed to inspire the unworthy, whether belonging to the police-force

or to the lower-class urban population, with a wholesome fear of

retribution; and he spared no effort to tighten up the divisional police

administration to discover by personal inquiry the character of his

subordinates, and to place a check upon immorality. The discipline which

he inculcated in the police force was evident at the census of 1901,

when, in response to the request of the census authorities for assistance

in enumerating the large cosmopolitan population of the city, he placed

his European police officers in charge of the census-sections, directed

the Sirdar Mir Abdul Ali to secure the co-operation of the leaders of

the various sections and castes among the lower classes, and made the

divisional police responsible on the actual night of the census for

counting the large army of homeless and wandering people, who are a

permanent feature of the capital of Western India. Mr. Lovat Fraser, then

editor of the _Times of India_, wrote a graphic account in his paper of

this “Counting by Candle-light”, and paid a tribute to the thoroughness

of the census organization. The author of this book, who happened to

be in charge of the urban census, under the orders of the Provincial

Superintendent, Mr. R. E. Enthoven, can testify truly that his plans

for the enumeration could not have been successful without the active

assistance of a police-force inspired by its chief with a high standard

of efficiency.

CHAPTER VIII

MR. H. G. GELL, M.V.O.

1902-1909

When Mr. Kennedy left Bombay on furlough preparatory to retirement, his

place was taken by Mr. Herbert G. Gell, who had held the substantive

appointment of Deputy Commissioner since 1884, and on three occasions

had acted for short periods as Commissioner. “Jel Saheb,” as the Indian

constables called him, was thus no stranger to the police-force or to

Bombay, when he took charge of the Commissioner’s office. So far as

personal popularity with all classes was concerned, the Government could

not have made a happier selection. In his younger days Mr. Gell had been

a good cricketer and the best racket-player in Bombay; and while this

counted in his favour chiefly with his own countrymen, his genial address

and straight-forwardness commended themselves equally to Europeans and

Indians. During his term of office, which lasted a little more than seven

years, he was granted furlough twice—in 1904 when Mr. Michael Kennedy,

afterwards Inspector-General of Police, Bombay Presidency, carried on his

duties, and again in 1906 when Mr. W. L. B. Souter, a son of Sir Frank

Souter, acted as _locum tenens_. During Mr. Gell’s first year of office,

the Deputy Commissioner’s post was filled by Superintendent J. Crummy, a

good police officer of the old type, who joined the force as a constable

in 1866 and finally retired from the service in 1903. He was succeeded

by Mr. R. P. Lambert (1903-1905), Mr. Reinold, who died prematurely, and

Mr. R. M. Phillips (1905-09), all of whom belonged to the Imperial Indian

Police service.

[Illustration: MR. H. G. GELL]

The years of Mr. Gell’s administration were fraught with anxiety and

difficulties of various kinds. Social and semi-political events like

the festivities in connexion with the Coronation of King Edward VII

and the visit of the Duke and Duchess of Connaught in 1903, the arrival

of the Prince and Princess of Wales in 1905, and the visit of the Amir

Habibullah of Afghanistan in 1907, imposed much extra work upon the

force. On the whole, however, they probably caused the Commissioner less

real anxiety than the Muharram riots of 1904, the Bombay Postal strike of

1906, the mill-hand strikes of 1907 and 1908, the serious Tilak riots of

1908, and last but not least the strike of the Bombay Indian constabulary

in 1907. Besides these symptoms of local discontent, the Commissioner

and his somewhat old-fashioned detective agency had to grapple with a

constantly growing stream of enquiries, reports and references, arising

out of the spread of the dangerous Indian revolutionary movement, which

was partly fostered and directed by men of extreme views living in France

and America.

The baneful activities of Krishnavarma and the India House in London, of

the brothers Savarkar, of Bal Gangadhar Tilak in the Deccan, and of the

anarchists of Bengal, had many ramifications in India, and, coupled with

the malignant incitements to sedition disseminated by certain vernacular

newspapers, imposed a large burden of confidential and secret work upon

the various provincial and urban police-forces. Some of these were but

poorly equipped to cope with this secret menace to the State. Bombay

from its proximity to the Deccan, which was the focus of intrigue in

western India, and from its position as the chief port of arrival from

Europe, had an important part to play in the official struggle against

the revolutionary movement. The difficulties which beset Mr. Gell’s

administration resulted largely from the fact that he was working with

a machine designed for dealing mainly with ordinary urban crime against

person and property, and numerically inadequate even for that purpose.

A thorough reorganization in respect of personnel, numbers and pay was

required to render the Bombay police force capable of dealing effectively

with the problems of the early years of the twentieth century.

The total numbers of the force in 1902 were 2,126 and the annual cost Rs.

773,580. The numbers remained practically stationary during Mr. Gell’s

_régime_, despite a great expansion of the residential area and a steady

increase of population during the first decade of the present century.

The prolonged visitation of the plague led many of the richer Indian

merchants to forsake their old family-houses in the crowded and low-lying

parts of the city and to seek a new domicile on Malabar and Cumballa

hills, which had previously been occupied almost wholly by European

residents. Many of the less well-to-do citizens sought new quarters in

the empty areas (the F and G divisions) in the north of the Island. The

Commissioner drew the attention of Government in 1903 to the alterations

which were taking place in Mahim, Sion, Matunga, Naigaon and adjacent

parts, and emphasized the consequent need of more police for watch and

ward. His view was corroborated by the census taken by the Municipal

Health authorities in 1906, which showed that the total population of

Bombay had increased by more than 200,000 since 1901, the increase being

general over all sections of the City and Island. In the light of these

facts a revision of the police establishment was obviously necessary, and

but for two events of primary importance it would probably have taken

the form of spasmodic increments to the existing strength and small

enhancements in the salaries and allowances of the constabulary.

The first important event was the publication in 1905 of the report of

the Police Commission appointed by Lord Curzon and presided over by

Sir Andrew Frazer. Of the Indian police service generally the report

was highly condemnatory, declaring it to be ‘far from efficient ...

defective in training and organization ... inadequately supervised

... and generally regarded as corrupt and oppressive.’ Though these

strictures referred chiefly to the district police forces of the various

provinces, it was admitted that the police organization of the large

cities required considerable overhauling. The Commissioners of Police in

Calcutta, Bombay and Madras were therefore instructed to submit proposals

for a thorough reorganization, based _mutatis mutandis_ upon the broad

lines laid down by the Police Commission. Owing to pressure of work and

other reasons Mr. Gell did not submit his proposals for reform for more

than two years after the publication of the report of Sir A. Frazer’s

Commission, and when they eventually reached the Bombay Government,

the latter found it impossible to accept them. Moreover, circumstances

connected with the outbreak and handling of the Tilak riots of July,

1908, led Government to believe that the police force needed a far more

comprehensive reorganization than was contemplated by the Commissioner.

In September, 1908, therefore, the Governor, Sir George Clarke,

(afterwards Lord Sydenham) appointed a special committee of three

officials—Mr. (afterwards Sir William) Morison of the Indian Civil

Service, Mr. S. M. Edwardes, also a member of the I. C. S., and Mr.

Pheroze H. Dastur, 2nd Presidency Magistrate—to scrutinize Mr. Gell’s

proposals, to take any evidence that might seem necessary, and finally

to submit detailed proposals for the numerical strength, pay and duties

of the various branches of the Police force. This committee held several

meetings in September and October, examined the Commissioner, Deputy

Commissioner and other members of the force, as well as certain leading

citizens, and submitted its report at the end of October, 1908. The

policy and proposals therein advocated met with the approval of the

Bombay Government; but the further step of introducing the changes in

the constitution of the force thereby involved, was not undertaken until

after Mr. Gell’s departure on leave in 1909. The broad details of the

scheme eventually sanctioned in September, 1910, can be explained more

suitably in the next chapter, which deals with the administration of Mr.

Gell’s successor. The facts mentioned above show the reason why the

actual numbers of the force at the date of Mr. Gell’s departure were

practically the same as they had been in 1902.

The second event of importance was the police strike, which obliged the

Bombay Government to introduce revised rates of pay for the constabulary

in advance of the general reorganization of the force. Rents in the

city and the cost of living had been steadily rising since 1900, and

the Indian police-constables, in common with other low-paid servants of

Government, found the burden of supporting themselves and their families

almost intolerable. The majority of them were Konkani Marathas—the large

class which supplies the bulk of the mill-labour and the menial staff

in public and private offices, and they could not remain unaffected by

the general demand for higher wages which was being made at this time

to all employers of labour. Their superior officers had assured them

more than once that their appeals were being favourably considered and

that some concessions would be granted, while the open sympathy with

their circumstances and their difficulties shown by Mr. Souter, when

acting as Commissioner in 1906, inspired them with the idea that their

claim to increased pay was absolutely unquestioned and deserved instant

confirmation by Government. They were also affected to some extent by the

constant and often bitter criticism of the authorities, which appeared in

the native Press, and by the incitements of professional agitators who

urged them to follow the lead of the postmen, who went on strike in 1906,

and adopt more overt measures to secure their demands. The unrest thus

created culminated in a strike of a large proportion of the constabulary

in 1907. Refusing to don their uniforms and report themselves for

duty until Government assented to their request for higher pay, the

men assembled in a body on the Esplanade _maidan_, where they were

addressed by the chief agitators in their own ranks. The Commissioner

was left to carry out the routine-work of the force with the help of

the European police, a certain number of constables who remained loyal,

and the comparatively useless body of Ramoshis. In brief, the police

administration was practically at a standstill.

By resorting to a strike, the men had rendered themselves individually

liable to prosecution; and when the strike was declared, Mr. Gell,

with the approval of Government, caused some of the ringleaders to be

arrested. But the Bombay Government was aware that their resort to

illegitimate action was the outcome of a real grievance, which could only

be redressed by enhancing the pay of the various grades. Consequently,

of the men arrested, only two were subsequently placed before the Courts

and sentenced to pay a nominal fine; and they and others were afterwards

reinstated in the force. Simultaneously the Government sanctioned the

long-delayed increase in the pay of the constables and native officers.

The old fourth-grade constable on Rs. 10 per mensem disappeared for ever,

the monthly pay of the lowest rank being fixed at Rs. 12 and of the three

upper ranks at Rs. 13, Rs. 14, and Rs. 15. The pay of the havildars was

also augmented. The announcement of the new rates put an end to the

_impasse_ caused by the men’s defection, and within a few days the force

was again working with full vigour.

It was unfortunate that the concessions in respect of pay and allowances

should have had the appearance of being extorted from the authorities by

methods which, often objectionable in the case of private employees, are

deplorable in the case of men appointed to be guardians of the public

peace. The Bombay Government was not so much to blame for procrastination

as might at first appear. They were perfectly prepared to grant the

required increments of salary to the lower ranks of the force: but they

wished to treat the revision of salaries as part and parcel of the

general reorganization, rendered necessary by the Report of the Police

Commission and by the increase of work resulting from the growth of

the City. They had instructed the Commissioner to formulate proposals

for reorganization, which had not been submitted at the date of the

strike, and which, when they eventually received them in 1908, they found

themselves unable to approve without further enquiry by an independent

committee. The responsibility for the delay in granting relief to

the constabulary cannot therefore be assigned wholly to the Bombay

Government. A more rapid effort to prepare without delay a comprehensive

scheme of reform might have helped to prevent the occurrence of an

episode, which did not redound to the credit of the force.

The result of the revision of the pay of native officers and constables,

secured in the manner described above, was an increase of the annual

cost of the force from Rs. 773,000 odd in 1902 to Rs. 975,000 in 1908.

These charges fell wholly upon the Provincial Government, in accordance

with the provisions of the Bombay Police Charges Act of 1907. Since 1872

the cost of the force had been borne partly by Government and partly by

the Bombay Municipality under Act III of 1872 and the subsequent Act

III of 1888. The arrangement did not prove wholly satisfactory, and

the Municipal Corporation evinced a tendency to deprecate increased

expenditure on a department over which it had no direct control. After

much discussion, therefore, between the Bombay Government and the

Corporation’s representatives, Bombay Act III of 1907 was passed by the

legislature. Under this enactment the Government was pledged to pay the

whole charges of the police-force, and the Municipal Corporation was

bound in return to shoulder the cost of primary education and, within

certain limits, the cost of medical relief in the City. This arrangement

in no wise absolved the Bombay Port Trust from its liability to pay a

moiety of the charges of the harbour police and the entire cost of the

police employed in the docks. On the other hand it enabled the Government

to sanction, without the intervention or concurrence of the Corporation,

such additional expenditure as might be involved in a thorough scheme of

reorganization. When the latter scheme had been introduced by Mr. Gell’s

successor, the improvement and standardization of the uniform of the

European officers of the force and the abolition of the old municipal

helmet-badges followed naturally upon the settlement of the changes

embodied in the Act.

Another important matter in the legislative sphere was the passing of

the Bombay City Police Act IV of 1902, which consolidated the provisions

of the preceding enactments and vested the whole control of the police

force in the Commissioner. The Act removed the difficulties of which

Mr. Kennedy had complained in 1898, and furnished the police with all

the legal authority required for the performance of watch and ward

duties, the investigation of offences, and the arrest and detention of

wrong-doers.

During the first decade of the twentieth century the volume of crime

steadily increased. The annual average number of cases for the

quinquennial periods ending in 1900 and 1905 was respectively 32,411 and

30,814: in 1908 the police dealt with nearly 41,000 cases. The number

of persons arrested likewise increased from 37,000 in 1900 to 44,000 in

1908, while the number of convictions secured in 1908 was 41,500, as

compared with 19,900 in 1880 and 34,450 in 1900. The value of property

stolen in 1880 was estimated at Rs. 146,000; in 1900 at Rs. 333,000; and

in 1908 at Rs. 353,000; while the percentage of recoveries during Mr.

Gell’s _régime_ decreased from 59 in 1902 to 37 in 1905 and rose again

to 56 in 1908. The annual migration of the people to plague-camps during

the hot months still offered special facilities to the professional

house-breaker, and was occasionally responsible, as in 1903, for an

abnormal number of thefts. A somewhat similar epidemic of robberies

resulted from the immigration of famine-stricken refugees in 1906. Many

of these cases defied investigation, as they were not immediately

reported; and in the case of thefts from houses temporarily vacated

during the season of heavy plague-mortality, the losses were often not

reported to the police until the owners returned two or three months

afterwards to their homes.

These failures, which may be ascribed in some measure to the absence of a

proper beat-system, were counter-balanced by the capture of two notorious

professional house-breakers, one of whom was a Parsi, Nanabhai Dinshaw

Daruwala, and the other a Borah named Tyebali Alibhai. Nanabhai was a

criminal of more than ordinary courage and address, who had gathered

around him a gang of clever assistants and had contrived to defy justice

for more than twenty years. He had amassed considerable wealth by his

house-breaking exploits, and as he spent his ill-gotten gains freely and

was ready to pay ample hush-money, he secured immunity from arrest for

many years. His capture was long sought without success. But at last, in

1907, the detective police managed to run him to ground, and, despite

the offer of heavy bribes for his release, secured his conviction and

imprisonment for a long term of years. The Borah, Tyebali, was a man of

much less ability, and confined his attention almost entirely to the

houses of respectable residents on Malabar Hill. In this area he carried

out a series of daring robberies both by day and night, and had disposed

of much valuable plate and jewellery before he was finally arrested and

convicted in 1908.

Hardly a year passed without one or more murders, the number which

occurred in 1902 and 1904 being respectively 18 and 20. Most of them were

of the usual type—murder for the purpose of robbery or as the punishment

of a wife or mistress for infidelity. With a few exceptions, all these

cases were successfully investigated by the detective branch of the

force. A prolonged and complicated series of forgeries, devised and

carried out by eighteen men possessed of education and private means,

was cleverly brought home to the culprits by Superintendent Sloane, who

was appointed head of the detective branch on the retirement of the

Sirdar Mir Abdul Ali in 1903.[110]

Neither the divisional nor the detective police, however, succeeded

in discovering the origin of the disastrous cotton-fires which took

place at Colaba in 1906. The value of the cotton destroyed or rendered

unsaleable was estimated at 40 lakhs of rupees. Since that date similar

conflagrations have occurred at intervals, in circumstances which seem to

justify more than a suspicion of deliberate incendiarism. But in spite

of special precautions and special police arrangements no practical

proof of complicity has ever been obtained. In 1913 these fires at the

Colaba cotton-green were so frequent and so disastrous that the Bombay

Government appointed a special committee under the chairmanship of Mr.

S. M. Edwardes, the Commissioner of Police at that date, to investigate

the circumstances and origin of the conflagrations and make proposals for

minimising the risk of them in future. The result of that committee’s

enquiry will be mentioned on a later page; but it may be here stated that

on each occasion of these wholesale conflagrations at the old Colaba

cotton-green the police found it very difficult to initiate and prosecute

inquiries about firms or individuals, suspected of aiding and abetting

incendiarism, owing to the disinclination of the insurance companies,

with whom the cotton was insured, to assist the inquiries or register a

formal complaint in respect of their losses. The system of underwriting

adopted by all the fire insurance companies in Bombay resulted in the net

loss incurred in any fire being divided among so many parties that the

actual sum paid out by the company concerned was comparatively trivial,

and did not, in their view, justify the adoption of proceedings, which

might have frightened the cotton-merchants into refusing to insure

their goods with them in future. Consequently, the only chance the

police had of discovering an offence was to arrest an incendiary _in

flagrante delicto_, and this was rendered practically impossible by

the character of the cotton, which will smoulder unseen for some time

before it bursts into flame, by the enormous width and height of the

stacks of cotton-bales, crowded on far too small an area on the edge of

a main thoroughfare, and by the ease with which any person could escape

detection in the labyrinth formed by the various _jethas_ or collections

of bales.

The question of traffic regulation in the streets demanded attention

during this period. By 1903 the number of public and private conveyances

in Bombay had risen to nearly 16,000, and although the style and

condition of the victorias plying for hire showed considerable

improvement,[111] rash driving was exceedingly common and street

accidents had largely increased. The position was aggravated by a steady

rise in the number of motor-vehicles, necessitating the creation of a

special branch of the police-force for the registration of motor-cars and

the issue of driving-licenses. One of the first owners of a car in Bombay

during the closing years of the nineteenth century was the late Mr. B. H.

Hewitt, one of the Municipal Engineers; and after 1900 his example was

followed by a constantly increasing number of residents, some of whom

showed a tendency to drive at excessive speed and to pay little attention

to the orders of the police on traffic-duty. Thus, between 1905 and 1907

more than 900 new motor-cars appeared on the streets, and in the latter

year the traffic-problem was further complicated by the abolition of the

old horse-tramcars and the opening on May 7th of the electric tramways.

In these circumstances the incapacity of the average Indian constable

to regulate traffic in the European manner became more marked, and

some of the Divisional Superintendents had to spend more time than they

could really spare in trying to inculcate an aptitude for directing

and controlling pedestrian and wheeled traffic. Their efforts were not

very successful, and it was generally felt that, although a few Indian

officers and constables had profited by tuition and showed improvement

in this branch of their duties, the presence of European police was

absolutely essential at crowded points during the busy hours of the day.

As previously remarked, the difficulties of the Indian constable were

much aggravated by the studied disregard of his orders and warnings,

frequently shown by his own compatriots.

As regards the beggar nuisance, Mr. Gell was disposed to continue the

policy of his predecessor; and accordingly in 1902 he deported no less

than 10,000 mendicants, mostly belonging to the territories of Indian

Princes. But this procedure was peremptorily forbidden by Government in

the following year, on the grounds that deportees of this class were

prolific disseminators of plague infection. After 1903, therefore, the

expulsion of beggars ceased, with the result that Bombay became once

again a popular resort for penurious and homeless vagrants from all parts

of India.

Efforts to rid Bombay of the foreign procurers, who subsisted on the

traffic in European women, continued unabated. In 1902 the Commissioner

deported 29 of these rascals; in 1903, 30; in 1904, 20; and in 1905,

2. No action was recorded in 1906 and 1907, but ten men were deported

in 1908. These figures indicate in some measure the dimensions of the

traffic and the lucrative nature of the business. The prospect of trivial

profits would scarcely have persuaded 81 aliens within a period of

four years to risk the chances of arrest and deportation. The history

and description of these foreigners were recorded in the files of the

detective branch, and in most cases their finger-print impressions were

taken by the Criminal Identification Bureau, which under the auspices of

Mr. Kirtikar and his assistant was rapidly acquiring a reputation for

useful work.

The daily work of the police in the courts was directly affected by

the establishment in 1904 of three benches of honorary magistrates in

Girgaum, Mazagon and Dadar, which were intended to afford relief to

the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Mr. J. Sanders Slater, and his three

colleagues in the disposal of unimportant police cases. A fourth bench

was established at the Esplanade Police Court in 1908, to deal with

petty cases from the Harbour and Docks. These benches were empowered to

deal with cases arising under certain sections of the Bombay City Police

Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, the Public Conveyance

Act, the Gambling Act, the Railways Act, and under section 352 of the

Indian Penal Code. They proved very convenient to the police of the

outlying F and G divisions, who were formerly obliged to bring offenders

and witnesses all the way to the stipendiary court in Mazagon, but they

involved much extra work for the European police officers of the various

sections, who had frequently to attend both the stipendiary and honorary

magistrates’ courts. The latter commenced their work daily at 8-45 a.m.,

and the stipendiary courts at 11 a.m., so that European officers of busy

sections had often to spend most of the working day in the courts. During

their absence the registration and investigation of complaints at the

police-station had perforce to remain in abeyance. One of the most urgent

requirements during Mr. Gell’s Commissionership was the creation of

properly equipped and staffed police-stations, at which, no matter what

the volume of work in the courts, at least one superior police officer

would be found on duty at any hour of the day or night, ready to record

complaints and initiate inquiries. The establishment of the benches of

honorary magistrates served to accentuate the inadequacy of the old

police system and the inability of the force to cope with a greatly

increased volume of case-work.

[Illustration: RAO SAHEB DAJI GANGAJI RANE]

A serious obstacle to any re-arrangement of duties was the illiteracy of

the great majority of the Indian subordinate officers and constabulary.

As early as 1868 the Bombay Government asked the Commissioner to mention

in his annual reports the progress made by the police in simple reading

and writing; to which the Commissioner replied that as each member of the

force was on actual duty for twelve hours out of the twenty-four, any

form of education was impracticable. In 1885, when the total strength of

the force was 1,721, there were only 113 officers and 362 men able to

read and write, and of these only the European officers were literate in

English. These numbers had slightly increased by the end of the following

decade, in consequence presumably of the gradual spread of primary

education. The numbers of officers and men able to read and write in 1896

were respectively 194 and 570. Occasionally an Indian with practically

no education would rise to a high grade in the force by sheer natural

ability and devotion to duty. Such men were the Subehdars Ramchandra

and Daji and Inspector Khan Bahadur Sheik Ibrahim Imam, of whom the

latter served for 47 years and on his retirement in 1911 was granted by

the Bombay Government a special _jagir_ (landed estate) in the Poona

District, in recognition of his long and meritorious service.[112] The

value of these men lay in their extraordinary knowledge of the urban

population, their _flair_ for criminal investigation, and their power of

mediation between conflicting sects. Their lack of education and their

ignorance of English debarred them from affording any relief to the

European police in the registration of complaints and the prosecution of

offenders in the courts.

No effort had been made to open a career in the force for literate

Indians of the upper-classes, and it became obvious during Mr. Gell’s

_régime_ that in this respect the composition of the force had not

kept abreast of the spirit of the age. While the general standard of

literacy in Bombay had widened appreciably, and the growth of population

had resulted in an increased number of cases of all kinds, the bulk of

the Indian element in the force remained ignorant of English and was

also often uneducated in its own vernaculars. Consequently the whole

responsibility for the routine duties of the force fell upon a limited

number of European officers, many of whom could claim no higher standard

of education than that provided for the rank and file of the British

Army. Among the latter, however, there were men of natural ability who by

dint of application and study at odd moments had acquired a fair standard

of general knowledge and could frame a good report of facts. To this

category belonged men like Superintendents McDermott, Grennan, Nolan,

Sloane, Williamson and others; and on their reports and administrative

capacity the Commissioner and his Deputy necessarily placed much

reliance. There were others, however, who acquired no literary polish

throughout their career and whose educational attainments were no higher

than when they first joined the force as supernumerary sub-inspectors. On

the other hand, these men were always a solid asset in times of popular

disturbance or at seasons of public festivity requiring the preservation

of order among large crowds. From the Superintendent down to the latest

joined Sub-Inspector, the European police contributed the leaven, which

stiffened the force at the periodical Muharram outbreaks and ensured the

orderly progress of events on the occasions of Royal and Viceregal visits.

The annual pilgrimage to Mecca again assumed large proportions during

these years. In 1902 the restrictions, imposed originally as a

precautionary plague-measure, were abolished, and the period opened

with the arrival in Bombay of about 1,000 pilgrims and with the return

of 3,376 Hajis, who had to be repatriated to various districts of

British India. In the following year the number of outgoing pilgrims was

8,700, and in 1904, 16,593, the large increase in the latter year being

ascribable to the occurrence of the _Akbari Haj_, which falls once in

ten years. But the traffic continued to expand. In 1905, 19,000 pilgrims

embarked at Bombay for Jeddah and nearly 14,000 returned; in 1906, 24,300

embarked and 16,000 returned; and in 1907 more than 20,000 from all parts

of India, from Bokhara, Turkestan and other parts of Central Asia, from

Ceylon and Java, had to be shepherded on board by the Pilgrim Department

of the Commissioner’s office. The majority of these people were wholly

uneducated; the existing _musafirkhanas_ (rest-houses) provided for them

in the City were quite inadequate for their proper accommodation; while

the vessels provided for the passage to Jeddah by two or three merchants

or companies were ill-found and equipped, and were becoming unseaworthy

by reason of age.

At the same time the treatment of the pilgrims at various stages of

their self-imposed journey, the behaviour of the pilgrim-brokers, who

arranged for the purchase of tickets and were responsible generally for

assisting pilgrims under the supervision of the Pilgrim Department, the

arrangements for their embarkation and the disinfection of their clothing

and effects, carried out by the Port Health authorities, and various

other matters connected with the annual exodus, occupied the increasing

attention of the Muhammadan community and occasionally formed the subject

of rather acid criticism. It was asserted that the whole subject of the

pilgrimage required more attention than an overworked Police Commissioner

could give it, and that more facilities should be accorded to respectable

Moslem residents for expressing their views on the details of the traffic

and for keeping in touch with the local arrangements for booking and

embarkation. Accordingly, the Bombay Government, with a view to disarming

criticism and in the hope of giving some relief to the Commissioner,

appointed in 1908 a Haj Committee, composed of leading Muhammadan

residents of Bombay, with the Commissioner of Police as _ex-officio_

President. During the first year of its existence, this Committee did not

do very much; but later it developed into a useful consultative body,

and gave much assistance to Mr. Gell’s successor in matters connected

with the comfort of the pilgrims and the local arrangements for housing

and disembarkation. On several occasions the members of the Committee

subscribed money from their own pockets to relieve cases of distress and

secure the repatriation of penniless Moslems stranded in Jeddah.

This period witnessed the preparation of schemes for the housing of

the police and the construction of police-stations. In 1902 the City

Improvement Trust forwarded to Government for approval plans for stations

and residential quarters at Wodehouse road in the Fort and at 1st.

Nagpada: and these buildings, together with quarters for the Risaldar

of the Mounted Police and stables for the sowars, were completed and

occupied in 1906. Meanwhile the Commissioner was pressing for the

provision of more accommodation for the constabulary, and he found a

powerful ally in the Police Surgeon, Dr. Arthur Powell, who reported in

1905 that the prevalence of pneumonia and consumption in the force was

primarily due to the residence of the men in dark, crowded and insanitary

_chals_. A little relief was afforded in 1908 by the completion of

a block of lines for constables and quarters for native officers in

Duncan road, and a set of quarters for European officers, with lines

for the men, was also completed at Sussex road in the same year. Much

expenditure, however, had still to be incurred before the force could be

said to be suitably housed.

Two other important buildings of a different character were provided

during Mr. Gell’s _régime_—the Northcote Police Hospital and the office

of the Protector of Pilgrims. Up to 1866 constables requiring medical

treatment were admitted to the Sir J. J. Hospital on Parel road. In

that year the stable of the old Hamilton Hotel was assigned as a

separate hospital for the police, and was so used till 1870, when the

Municipality placed an old workshop in Mazagon at the disposal of the

Police Commissioner. This ramshackle building, which accommodated only

35 indoor patients, was totally unsuited for a hospital and was a source

of constant and justifiable complaint. Nevertheless the police were

forced to put up with it, until Lord Northcote, the Governor, (1900-03)

sanctioned the construction of a proper building, accommodating 94

patients, on one of the new roads at Nagpada constructed by the City

Improvement Trust. The building was formally opened by Lord Lamington in

August, 1904.

The growth of the annual Haj traffic, mentioned in a previous paragraph,

rendered accommodation for the office of the Protector of Pilgrims an

urgent necessity. A ground-floor building, consisting of a large covered

porch and two or three rooms, was therefore built in 1907 in the compound

of the Head Police Office and served as the headquarters of the Pilgrim

department, until the reorganization of the Criminal Investigation

Department by Mr. Edwardes and his Deputy, Mr. F. A. M. H. Vincent,

rendered necessary a re-arrangement of the accommodation at headquarters.

Before we describe the disturbances which occurred during Mr. Gell’s

tenure of office, a word may be said of the courage and resource

occasionally shown by Indian constables in the course of their daily

duty. In 1903 a havildar was awarded the medal of the Royal Humane

Society for rescuing two boys from drowning; a constable received the

medal for similar action in the following year; while in 1906 the Society

rewarded three constables for saving life in difficult and dangerous

circumstances. On several occasions also the Commissioner rewarded

constables for actions marked by conspicuous courage or intelligence.

These instances serve to support the opinion that under proper leadership

the Maratha of the Konkan and the Muhammadan of the Deccan will show

plenty of sang-froid in emergencies. Considering that the men received

little or no training before being placed on duty in the streets, that

they had little or no education, and that they served year after year in

a climate which is notoriously enervating and under conditions productive

of ill-health, it is greatly to the credit of the police constable that

he performed his duty with so few serious mistakes and that he frequently

gave proof of personal courage and tenacity. If at times he appeared

to cling too closely to the _pan-supari_ shops in the vicinity of his

post or beat, or to lack alertness in directing traffic, it must be

remembered that he was rarely off duty for any length of time, that he

had singularly little opportunity for recreation and amusement, and that

long hours of point-duty under the Bombay sun would try the strongest

constitution.

Twice during Mr. Gell’s term of office the peace of the City was

broken by rioting at the annual celebration of the Muharram. The first

occasion was March 23rd, 1904, the fifth day of the festival, when the

ancient antagonism between the Sunni and Shia sects developed into open

hostility. The ostensible cause of the disturbance was the determination

of the Sunni processionists to play music and beat their tom-toms

in front of the Bohra mosque in the notorious Doctor Street. Casual

street-fighting between the Bohras and their antagonists occurred daily

up to March 27th (the _Katal-Ki-Rat_ or night of slaughter), and the

aspect of affairs was so ominous that Mr. Gell decided to cancel the

license for the _tabut_ procession from Rangari _moholla_ (i.e. Abdul

Rehman street and adjoining lanes), the inhabitants of which had been

directly responsible for several assaults upon the Bohras. This order was

strongly resented by the general Sunni population, which resolved not to

carry out the _tabuts_ for immersion on the final day of the festival.

As usual, the abandonment of the _tabut_ procession released large

bodies of hooligans and bad characters, who testified to their annoyance

by attacking the police and the general public. At the same time the

Bohras were seized by a general panic, the results of which might have

been disastrous, and this fact, combined with the open disorder in the

streets, led Mr. Gell to summon the military forces to his assistance.

The Cheshire Regiment, a Battery of the R. A., the Railway Volunteers,

the Bombay Light Horse and H. E. the Governor’s Bodyguard were despatched

to various points of the disturbed area and picketed the streets

until April 1st, when peace was finally restored. The casualties were

fortunately few, and serious loss of life was prevented by the speedy

arrival of the troops.

Another serious disturbance marred this festival during the last year

of Mr. Gell’s Commissionership. On the morning of February 13th, 1908,

a fracas occurred between a Shia tabut-procession, composed of Julhais,

Mughals, Khojas and a few Bohras, and a body of Sunni Muhammadans

congregated at a mosque in Falkland road. The police arrested some of

the Sunnis who appeared to be the ringleaders in the affray. The news of

the encounter spread rapidly to other quarters; and the arrest of their

co-sectaries so annoyed the Sunni Muhammadans that they declined to take

out their _tabuts_ in procession. This resulted, as usual, in letting

loose on the streets hundreds of low-class and combative Muhammadans, who

usually accompanied the processions, and they straightway proceeded to

sow the seeds of disorder in various parts of the bazar. In the hope of

averting a catastrophe Mr. Gell gave orders early in the afternoon for

the release of the men arrested after the fracas in the morning. But the

temper of the mob had by that time been aroused, the cry of _Huriya,

Huriya_, was raised, and the ominous stampedes and rushes which usually

preceded an outbreak of disorder occurred in the streets and lanes

bordering on the Grant and Parel roads. The mob confined itself to these

tactics and to spasmodic attacks on the Bohras and other Shias until the

late hours of the afternoon, when serious rioting broke out on Parel

road. Here the Pathan element joined forces with the mob; shops were

looted and set on fire; all traffic was stopped and the tram-cars were

stoned. General panic supervened. As the mob was truculent and refused to

disperse, Mr. Gell ordered the European police, who were facing the mob

in Parel road (Bhendy Bazar), to use their revolvers. The firing put a

stop to the actual rioting, but in view of the general demeanour of the

crowds, troops were called out in the evening in aid of the civil power

and remained on duty in the disturbed quarter until the next day.

These Muharram disturbances, though imposing a severe strain upon the

Commissioner and the police force, caused less concern to the general

public than the prolonged rioting in the industrial quarter in July,

1908, when more than 400,000 mill-hands broke into open disorder after

the conviction of the late Bal Gangadhar Tilak for sedition by the High

Court. Tilak had been arrested in Bombay on June 24th on charges arising

out of the publication in his paper, the _Kesari_, of articles containing

inflammatory comments on the Muzaffarpur outrage, in which Mrs. and Miss

Kennedy had been killed by a bomb—the first of a long list of similar

outrages in Bengal. The bomb was extolled in these articles as ‘a kind of

witchcraft, a charm, an amulet’, and the _Kesari_ delighted in showing

that neither ‘the supervision of the police’ nor ‘swarms of detectives’

could stop ‘these simple playful sports of science.’ Whilst professing

to deprecate such methods, it threw the responsibility upon Government,

which allowed ‘keen disappointment to overtake thousands of intelligent

persons who have been awakened to the necessity of securing the rights

of _Swaraj_’. “Tilak spoke for four whole days in his own defence—21½

hours altogether—but the jury returned a verdict of “Guilty”, and he was

sentenced to six years’ transportation, afterwards commuted on account of

his age and health to simple imprisonment at Mandalay.”[113]

From the moment of his arrest, Tilak’s agents and followers descended

upon the mill-area of Bombay and sedulously spread the story that Tilak

had been arrested because he was the friend of the industrial workers and

had tried to obtain better wages for them. Some of them were reported

to have declared during the trial that there would be a day’s bloodshed

for every year to which he might be sentenced by the Court. Most of the

‘jobbers’ who control the supply of labour were easily won over, and

Tilak’s Brahman emissaries from Poona found many co-adjutors among their

own caste-men in Bombay, and among the Bhandaris and Konkani Marathas

living in Parel, Tardeo, Chinchpugli and Dadar sections. Curiously

enough the Ghatis, or Marathas from the Deccan, showed far less interest

in the trial of Tilak and far less disposition to violence than their

caste-fellows from Ratnagiri and other districts of the western seaboard.

The Deccan mill-hands at Sewri, for example, at the very height of the

rioting, informed an Englishman with whom they were familiar that he need

fear no harm from them, and they confirmed their words by taking no share

in the disturbance which lasted for six days. The hostile attitude of the

Konkani Marathas was due to the continuous efforts of agitators, and this

was particularly the case in the neighbourhood of Currey and De Lisle

roads, where special agents from their own districts had been introduced

by Tilak’s revolutionaries.

The probability of a disturbance was foreseen by the authorities, and Mr.

Gell took various precautions to circumscribe the area of the outbreak.

British regiments, Indian infantry and cavalry were held in readiness;

a barricade was erected on Mayo road leading to the High Court; several

officials and non-officials were appointed Special Magistrates and were

posted at important points to watch the progress of events, assist the

police, and take all feasible measures for securing the peace of the

City. The Special Magistrates were a curiously mixed body. Among them

were Mr. James Macdonald, a sexagenarian Scotsman, who had served the

City for years as a member of the Municipal Corporation; Colonel Cordue,

R. E., the Master of the Mint; Mr. Philip Messent, Engineer of the Port

Trust; Mr. Arthur Leslie of Messrs. Greaves, Cotton and Co., who filled

his pockets with lemon-grass oil for the benefit of the men of the Royal

Scots, who were posted at the old police _chauki_ in Jacob’s Circle and

had their bare knees badly bitten by the mosquitoes and other forms of

low life which shared the _chauki_ with the police-constables; the author

of this work, who was at the time enjoying a spell of comparative ease in

the literary backwaters of the Bombay City Gazetteer; and last but not

least, the Hon. Arthur Hill-Trevor, a commercial free-lance and honorary

magistrate, who regarded himself as a sort of Honorary and Supernumerary

Deputy Commissioner of Police, and in that capacity executed various

blood-curdling manœuvres which caused no little apprehension to his more

pacific colleagues.

It so happened that some of the precautions proved superfluous. There

was no attempt on the part of the rioters to rush the High Court or even

to attend the trial of Tilak: there was no organized attempt to march on

the European residential quarter or to attack the European population

_en masse_. Although the rioting assumed at times a very threatening

character, it was confined wholly to the mill-area, except on one

afternoon, when the Bania merchants, employed in the cloth-market of

the C division, turned out in force and had to be dispersed by firing.

A consideration of all the circumstances of the Tilak riots leads one

to infer that the Commissioner was not as well served by his detective

agency as he might have been, and that the disturbances might have

been more disastrous and have lasted longer, if Tilak’s emissaries and

agents had had more time at their disposal in which to foster the spirit

of violence. By the end of the first day’s rioting it was clear that

outlying areas like the Fort and Malabar Hill were exposed to no danger,

and consequently most of the Special Magistrates gravitated from their

original posts to Jacob’s Circle, which divided the industrial quarters

from the central portion of the City and served as a gathering-ground for

the forces of law and order.

Within the mill-district the rioting was fairly continuous and

occasionally serious, and isolated Europeans whose duties obliged them to

reside in the area north of Jacob’s Circle found it wise to vacate their

houses for the time being and seek shelter in Mazagon, the Fort and other

parts. Much damage was done to mill-property, and in several encounters

with the mob the European police were forced to use their revolvers and

the troops had to fire in self-defence. The Indian cavalry were stoned

from the _chals_ on more than one occasion, and small parties of unarmed

police fared badly at the hands of the rioters, who had accumulated

considerable stores of brick-bats and road-metal at convenient

vantage-points.

The Bombay Government, realizing that the trouble was not a sudden

and spontaneous outburst of popular feeling and that the rebellious

mill-hands were the victims of an unscrupulous agitation, based on

malevolent falsehood, had issued strict orders for the avoidance of

bloodshed as far as possible: and both the military forces and the police

exercised such steady self-restraint that the casualties were relatively

few. Nevertheless the continuance of rioting and the dislocation of

business in the City set many people wondering whether other methods

of restoring peace might not be tried. About the fifth day of the

disturbance the Chamber of Commerce sent a deputation to the Governor,

to point out the loss sustained by the commercial and trade-interests

of the City and to urge upon Government a stronger effort to dissuade

the mill-population from violence. The author of this history, who had

witnessed the whole sequence of events at Jacob’s Circle and had on one

occasion accompanied a detachment of the Northampton Regiment to Dadar

to protect certain isolated Europeans, had already asked permission

of Mr. (afterwards Sir John) Jenkins, Member of Council, to visit the

heart of the disturbed area in company with certain Indian gentlemen

who had offered their assistance, and endeavour to produce a milder

feeling among the mill-hands. The permission was granted. Accordingly

the writer, accompanied by the late Rao Bahadur Narayan T. Vaidya, Dr.

Dinanath Naik Dandekar and four or five others, visited a large number of

mill-hands’ _chals_ and dwellings in Parel and Dadar, spoke to several

groups of mill-hands, and urged them to resume their regular duties. In

places the party was met with sullen hostility and with shouts of _Tilak

Maharaj ki Jai_, but the eloquence of the Indian members of the party

was not without effect, and when Rao Bahadur N. T. Vaidya urged them to

substitute _Satya Narayan ki Jai_ for their Tilakite war-cry, some of

them seemed disposed to accept the suggestion.

Though some were inclined to look askance at their intervention, the

efforts of this little peace-party did engender a better feeling, and

this, coupled with a natural weariness of prolonged hostilities and the

loss of their wages, resulted in the gradual return of tranquillity

after the sixth day. By the end of the first week of August, affairs had

resumed their normal course, the mill-hands were again at work, and the

Bombay Government were at liberty to consider the salient features and

lessons of the outbreak. Sir George Clarke, the Governor, was blamed

in some quarters for having paid a sympathetic visit, after the close

of the riots, to wounded mill-hands in the Sir J.J. Hospital. But his

policy in this matter was dictated by an earnest desire to smooth away

the bitterness which measures of repression are calculated to provoke,

and by a conviction that there had been an absence of contact between

the local authorities and the industrial population, which had been

permitted to fall completely under the lawless influence of Tilak and his

immediate followers. The fact that the disturbances lasted for a whole

week invited a doubt whether the police arrangements were as effective as

they might have been, and whether indeed a more efficient intelligence

organization might not have facilitated a speedier conclusion of the

unsatisfactory duties which the military were called upon to perform. An

impression prevailed that, although the mill-hands who defied the police

and troops had been severely punished, the real authors and fomenters of

the disturbances had managed to escape scot-free, and that they could

not have enjoyed such immunity, if the police had had their fingers more

closely upon the pulse of the City.

So far as concerns the prosecution and conviction of Tilak, Sir George

Clarke won “the respect of the vast majority of the community, and

although he failed to secure the active support which he might have

expected from the ‘moderates’, there were few of them who did not

secretly approve and even welcome his action. Its effects were great

and enduring, for Tilak’s conviction was a heavy blow to the forces

of unrest, at least in the Deccan; and some months later, one of the

organs of his party, the _Rashtramat_, reviewing the occurrences of the

year, was fain to admit that ‘the sudden removal of Mr. Tilak’s towering

personality threw the whole province into dismay and unnerved the other

leaders’”.[114]

Having thus secured the discomfiture of the revolutionary party in

Western India, the Governor applied himself to the problem of the Bombay

City Police administration, which appeared to him to need revision, not

only in response to the general findings of the Police Commission, but

also by reason of its apparent failure to keep closely in touch with

political intrigue, such as that which precipitated the riots of July

1908. Apart from the mere question of numbers and pay, the force appeared

to the Governor to be working on somewhat obsolete lines and to need

keying up to the pitch at which it might cope more successfully both

with its regular duties of watch and ward and with the large amount of

confidential investigation necessitated by the rapid and alarming growth

of political unrest and sedition. These were the main reasons underlying

the appointment of the Morison Committee, which has been described in an

earlier paragraph. One of the most important sections of that committee’s

report was concerned with the reorganization of the old detective branch

of the police-force, hereafter to be called the Criminal Investigation

Department (C. I. D.), upon which devolved the task of watching the trend

of political movements and of accumulating knowledge of the antecedents

and actions of the chief fomenters of unrest.

The work of a police-officer in an Indian city has always been extremely

arduous, and few men in these days are able to bear the strain for many

years without some loss of vitality and health. There is little doubt

that the extra work and anxiety entailed by the Royal Visit of 1905,

which was followed a few days later by the arrival of Lord Minto and the

departure of Lord Curzon, had much to do with the temporary breakdown of

health which obliged Mr. Gell to take furlough in 1906; while the strain

inevitably imposed upon him by the Muharram and Tilak riots of 1908 was

partly the cause of his again taking leave to England in the early part

of 1909. In doing so, his long service in the City came to an end: for

by the time his leave had expired, his successor was in the midst of a

comprehensive reorganization scheme, which would have suffered in the

event of his reversion to his own grade in the Indian Civil Service.

In order, therefore, to enable him to complete his full period of

pensionable service, Mr. Gell, on his return from England, was appointed

Deputy Inspector-General of Police for the Presidency and a little later

for Sind. It was in Sind that he completed his official career, and from

Karachi that he sailed finally for England. His long connexion with the

City of Bombay is commemorated, though not perhaps adequately, in the

name of one of the newer streets opened by the City Improvement Trust in

the neighbourhood of Ripon road. Memories of his equability of temper and

his impartiality are still cherished by the older officers and men of the

police-force, who pay a willing tribute to his character as an officer

and a gentleman.

CHAPTER IX

MR. S. M. EDWARDES, C.S.I., C.V.O.

1909-1916

Mr. S. M. Edwardes, who succeeded Mr. Gell as head of the Bombay City

Police Force, was the first member of the Indian Civil Service to hold

that appointment. He had previously held various appointments in Bombay

ranging from Assistant to the Collector and Chief Inspector of Factories

to acting Municipal Commissioner, and had acquired considerable knowledge

of the population and past history of Bombay by his work as Census

Officer in 1901 and later as Compiler of the Gazetteer. Shortly after the

Tilak riots in 1908, he was nominated a member of the Morison Committee

which, as previously stated, was appointed by the Bombay Government

to consider the working of the urban police administration and make

proposals for its future organization.

[Illustration: MR. S. M. EDWARDES]

This Committee, which met in the Secretariat, directed particular

attention to the provision of properly equipped police stations, to

the reconstitution and enlargement of the detective branch, hereafter

to be known as the C. I. D., to the creation of a trained Indian staff

for the investigation of crime in the Divisions, and to the numbers

and personnel of the European and Indian branches of the force. The

Committee came to the conclusion from the facts and evidence before them

that in dealing with political crime and seditious movements, planned,

promoted and carried out by an Indian _intelligentsia_, the police

were handicapped by the absence of educated Indians in the subordinate

ranks of the force, and that the investigation of ordinary crime by the

divisional police suffered from being in the hands of an old-fashioned

agency, which conducted its inquiries in a multiplicity of small and

sometimes obscure _chaukis_ and kept no proper record of its cases.

Concentration of the staff in a definite number of properly-equipped

stations in each division, and the inclusion in the force of a new cadre

of Indian officers for the divisional investigation of crime were two

obvious desiderata, upon which the Committee laid particular stress.

They decided also that the time had arrived to place the C. I. D. under

the immediate control of a gazetted officer of the Imperial Police, who

would occupy the position of a Deputy Commissioner, leaving the existing

Deputy Commissioner to deal with the divisional police and with the large

amount of miscellaneous work requiring the attention of the headquarters

staff. Proposals, of a more or less tentative character, were also

made regarding the numbers, grading and duties of the European police,

the recruitment of Indian constables, and the numbers and work of the

Harbour, Docks and Mounted Police.

After drafting the report of the Committee and arranging for its

submission to Government in October, 1908, Mr. Edwardes took leave

to England. While there, he received an intimation from the Bombay

Government of their intention to appoint him Commissioner of Police

_vice_ Mr. Gell, who proposed to take leave in 1909. He was at the same

time instructed to visit Scotland Yard and study at first hand the

organization of the Metropolitan Police. Armed with a letter from the

Home Office to the Chief Commissioner, Sir Edward Henry, Mr. Edwardes

accordingly spent some time in the early part of 1909 in acquainting

himself with the distribution of work and the machinery for the

prevention and detection of crime in a typical London police division,

with the details of the Metropolitan beat-system, with the work of the

constables’ training-school in Westminster, with the organization of

the Finger Print Bureau, and with the staffing, equipment, structural

features and general management of one of the latest and most up-to-date

London police-stations. The knowledge thus acquired was of the greatest

value, when his own proposals for the reorganization of the Bombay City

Police were under preparation.

Mr. Edwardes assumed charge of the Commissioner’s office on May

7th, 1909, with Mr. R. M. Phillips as his Deputy Commissioner and

Superintendent Sloane as head of the Criminal Investigation Department.

The former was succeeded in July by Mr. Hayter, who made way in September

for Mr. Gadney. The latter served as Deputy Commissioner until November,

1913, when his place was taken by Mr. O. Allen Harker, who held the

appointment until after the expiry of Mr. Edwardes’ term of office. In

pursuance of the recommendations of the Morison Committee, an additional

appointment of Deputy Commissioner in charge of the C. I. D. was

sanctioned by G. R. J. D. 3253 of June 8th, 1909; and, Superintendent

Sloane having been promoted to the cadre of the Imperial Police and

transferred to a district, the new post was given to Mr. F. A. M. H.

Vincent, son of the former Commissioner of Police, who held it until the

beginning of 1913, when he was appointed Deputy Director of Criminal

Intelligence at Simla. He was succeeded in Bombay by Mr. F. C. Griffith,

who remained in charge of the C. I. D. during the remainder of Mr.

Edwardes’ term of office. Both Mr. Vincent and Mr. Griffith subsequently

succeeded in turn to the Commissioner’s appointment. In 1914 a third

appointment of Deputy Commissioner was sanctioned by G. R. J. D. 9249 of

December 19th, 1914, under the style and title of Deputy Commissioner of

Police for the Port of Bombay. Mr. G. S. Wilson was chosen for this post

and became responsible, under the general authority of the Commissioner,

for all work connected with the Harbour and Dock Police and the Pilgrim

Traffic. This period thus witnessed the permanent appointment of three

Deputy Commissioners in place of a single officer of that rank, and

the consequent delegation to them by the Commissioner of much of the

work which he had hitherto been expected to perform without adequate

assistance.

Mr. Edwardes’ appointment was not received favourably at first by

the members of the Imperial Police Service, who naturally felt some

resentment at such a post being given to one who was not a professional

police-officer. This feeling led to the submission of memorials on the

subject to the Bombay Government, who were able without difficulty to

justify their departure from the usual practice. The discontent also

communicated itself to the rank and file of the City police, who during

the first few months of Mr. Edwardes’ _régime_ displayed a spirit of

captious criticism, which was fanned at last by a few malcontents into

overt disobedience. The movement culminated on January 7th, 1910, in the

refusal of a certain number of Indian constables to receive their pay.

The Commissioner, who had kept himself informed of the course of the

movement, had arranged with the European officers of the Divisions what

action should be taken in the event of open insubordination. The men who

declined to accept their pay were therefore marched immediately to the

Head Police Office and, after inquiry into their conduct, were dismissed

from the force. This action completely quashed the movement, which was

based upon no real grievance and was designed merely to cause trouble to

a Commissioner, whose policy and plans they had been taught to regard

with suspicion.

The strength and cost of the City Police Force underwent much alteration

during this period of seven years, in consequence of the reorganization

scheme prepared by the Commissioner. His proposals for the future

constitution and character of the force, which were submitted in July,

1910, were sanctioned by the Government of India in September, 1911; but

owing to very heavy work connected with the visit of Their Majesties the

King and Queen in November of that year, the scheme was not actually

introduced until the beginning of 1912. As early as 1909, however,

certain changes were made in consonance with the proposals of the

Morison Committee, and to meet emergent requirements, which resulted in

an increase of the total number to 2,408. This total included additions

to the Dockyard police, temporary sanitary police for service under the

Port Health Officer, temporary constables for traffic-duty at various

railway level crossings, and finally the revised strength of the C.

I. D., which was fixed by G. R. J. D. 2708 of May 10th, 1909, at 1

Superintendent, 6 Inspectors, 7 Sub-Inspectors, 23 Head Constables and

41 Constables. In 1910 an additional Inspector was sanctioned for the

Motor Vehicles department; and 9 Indian sub-inspectors, 3 head constables

and 9 constables were added to the force, to enable the Commissioner to

introduce tentatively in three areas the new divisional organization

which formed the salient feature of his administrative proposals. Thus by

1911 the force numbered 2,505, which was equivalent to a proportion of

one policeman to every 394 of population, and cost annually, inclusive

of temporary police and contingent charges, Rs. 10,93,351. In 1913,

when the reorganization was well in hand, the total strength of the

force stood at 2,844 and cost Rs. 12,73,834; while at the end of 1915,

a few months before Mr. Edwardes relinquished office, the total number,

inclusive of a small temporary staff for watching transfrontier Pathans

in the City, was 3,011, and the annual cost amounted to Rs. 13,37,208.

The proportion of police to population at this date was 1 to 327, which

compared unfavourably with the proportions in Calcutta and London. Had

the Commissioner’s first proposals been sanctioned without alteration,

the proportion of police to population in Bombay would have been far more

favourable; for he had worked out a complete beat-system on the London

model for the whole of the City. The number of men, however, required

for this purpose was naturally large, and as the Bombay Government

were compelled by the Government of India to restrict the additional

annual cost of the force to 2½ lakhs of rupees, the Commissioner was

obliged to jettison the beat-system and utilize the available funds in

other directions, such as perfecting the divisional machinery for the

investigation of crime, increasing the number of fixed traffic posts, and

augmenting the inadequate pay of the European police.

This force of just over 3,000 men was distributed among the following

divisions at the close of 1916:—

---------+----------------------------------------------------------

Division | Sub-divisions or Sections

---------+----------------------------------------------------------

A | Colaba, Fort South, Fort North, Esplanade

B | Mandvi, Chakla, Umarkhadi, Dongri

C | Market and Dhobi Talao, Bhuleshwar and Khara Talao

D | Khetwadi, Girgaum, Chaupati, Walkeshwar

E | Mazagon, Tarwadi, Kamathipura, New Nagpada, Mahalakshmi,

| Jacob’s Circle

F | Parel, Dadar, Matunga, Sion

G | Mahim, Worli

H and I | Harbour and Docks

L | Head Quarters Armed and Unarmed Police

M | Mounted Police

N | The Government Dockyard

and The Criminal Investigation Department (formerly the K division).

With the appointment of Mr. F. A. M. H. Vincent as Deputy Commissioner,

C. I. D., and the increase in its personnel, the Criminal Investigation

Department entered upon a period of remarkable activity. The staff

was divided into four branches—Political, Foreign, Crime, and

Miscellaneous—each in control of one or more Inspectors; work-books were

introduced, which fixed responsibility upon individual officers for

cases entrusted to them for inquiry and served as a check upon delay

in the submission of final reports of investigations; a confidential

strong-room was provided, and the card index system and upright filing

of records were substituted for the old methods in vogue at this

date in most official departments. In addition to the investigation

of cases, some of the more remarkable of which will be mentioned

hereafter, the department made confidential inquiries, often of a

delicate character, into political, religious and social movements;

it scrutinized plays for performance licenses, amending or rejecting

those that were objectionable; it took vigorous action under the Press

Act, confiscating on occasions as many as twenty-one thousand copies of

proscribed books; it maintained a constant watch upon the arrivals and

departures of steamers, assisted the Excise authorities, collaborated

with the police of other districts and provinces, supervised and, if

necessary, prohibited the songs sung by the _melas_ at the annual Ganpati

celebration, and performed an immense amount of confidential work in

connexion with the Muharram. It also assisted or secured the repatriation

of all manner of destitute persons stranded in Bombay, including English

theatrical artistes, Arabs belonging to French territories, ladies from

Mauritius, Bengali seamen, Pathan labourers expelled from Ceylon, and

deportees from the Transvaal.

The establishment at the beginning of 1911 of a “Police Gazette”,

appearing thrice in the twenty-four hours and containing full details of

all reported crimes, persons wanted, property stolen or lost, etc., was

a further step in the direction of increased efficiency. Prior to this

date, when a case of theft occurred, the first duty of the Inspector, in

whose jurisdiction it took place, was to prepare with his own hand thirty

or forty notices for dispatch to other police-stations in the City.

Much valuable time was thus wasted; and when the notices were ready,

several constables had to be released from their proper duties to act as

messengers. Under the system introduced in 1911 the duty of the sectional

officer consisted simply in telephoning full details to the Deputy

Commissioner C. I. D., who arranged for their insertion in the next issue

of the “Gazette”, copies of which were delivered at every police station

within a few hours of the occurrence. The arrangements were adapted from

the system followed in London and effected a great saving of time and

trouble in the divisions. In 1915 the Police Notice Office, composed of a

European Inspector and an Indian head constable, circulated in this way

nearly 10,000 paragraphs and 67 supplements dealing with murders, thefts,

deserters and persons wanted, and also published and circulated to the

divisions forty pages of special orders concerned with daily routine.

Another salient feature of the reorganization, as mentioned above, was

the creation of a special agency for the divisional investigation of

crime. This was dependent upon the provision of properly-equipped police

stations of a definite type, recommended by Mr. Edwardes, comprising

the necessary offices, charge-room, cells, quarters for the European

and Indian staff, and barracks for the constabulary. The scheme, as

sanctioned, contemplated the provision of 17 stations of this character.

At the date when Mr. Edwardes was appointed Commissioner, none of the

existing police-stations fulfilled these requirements, and in some

divisions paucity of accommodation directly hampered the daily work of

the police. In 1911, for example, the station of the Khetwadi section

of the D division was described as practically non-existent. The lease

of a building having expired, and no alternative accommodation being

available, the Inspector was holding his office in the dressing-room

of an Indian theatre in Grant road, the station-stores and constables’

kit-boxes were temporarily placed in a tea-shop in Falkland road, and

the two European officers of the section were forced to reside in very

poor quarters in an adjoining section. Most of the older stations were

very inconvenient and insanitary. The only office consisted of one of

the sectional Inspector’s dwelling-rooms or of a portion of a verandah

screened off; prisoners and witnesses were herded together on the stairs

or in the street; the residence was surrounded by old-fashioned and

odoriferous latrines; and every odd corner was choked with kit-boxes and

with the recumbent forms of constables taking a rest before going on duty.

By the end of 1910, however, a complete programme for new stations had

been prepared, and sanctioned by Government, and a commencement had been

made in Colaba, Nagpada and Agripada, where the newer police-stations

erected by the Improvement Trust were subjected to structural alterations

and additions, in order to make them conform with the plan adapted

from the London model. Each of these stations was equipped with a

staff composed of one Inspector, one Deputy Inspector, three Indian

Sub-Inspectors for criminal investigation, plain-clothes constables

and a clerical staff; the first information sheet, case-diary and

other records used by the District Police were so adapted to urban

requirements as to secure a complete record of every case taken up by

the police; and the time-table of duties was arranged so that at any

moment during the twenty-four hours an English-knowing officer, with

power to record complaints and commence inquiries, would be found in the

general charge-room of the station. At the outset most of the Indian

Sub-Inspectors were chosen from among the few English-knowing Jemadars

and Havildars, already in the force; but from 1910 onwards a regular

supply of such officers was secured by choosing young Indians of good

middle-class standing and deputing them to the Provincial Police Training

School at Nasik for an eighteen months’ course of tuition in law and

police-work.

At the beginning of 1913 the Commissioner opened two more stations on the

new model at Princess Street—a building erected by the Improvement Trust

in 1910, and at Maharbaudi: and two more in 1914 in the new buildings of

the Harbour and Dock police at Mody Bay and Frere road respectively,

which were completed and occupied in January. At the beginning

of January, 1916, three more stations were established under the

reorganization scheme at Khetwadi, Hughes road, and the Esplanade, while

at the close of the same year similar stations were organized in the

new buildings erected at Gamdevi, Lamington road and Palton road. Thus,

by the end of 1916 thirteen out of the seventeen model police-stations,

originally proposed by the Commissioner, had been opened with a full

complement of officers and men, while plans had been approved for similar

accommodation in Mahim, Parel and other places in the northern portion

of the Island of Bombay. Where it was found impossible to build full

residential accommodation for both officers and men on the site allotted

for these new stations, ancillary accommodation schemes were prepared,

which, when completed, would ensure the proper housing of the majority of

the force as it existed at the date of Mr. Edwardes’ departure.

A sustained effort was made during these years to teach English to the

Indian constabulary, with the object of giving the men themselves a

better chance of promotion and enabling them to hold their own more

confidently with the large English-speaking population. In 1910 the

number of officers, exclusive of Europeans, able to read and write was

127, of whom only 36 were literate in English, while literate constables,

of whom only one or two knew English, numbered 584. In July 1911 the

Commissioner commenced sending a chosen number of Muhammadan and Hindu

constables to two free night-schools for instruction in English and

one vernacular language. The success attending this experiment led the

Bombay Government to sanction a proposal to open an English school for

constables at the Head Police Office, under a qualified teacher from

one of the official training-schools maintained by the Educational

Department. This school was attended by 150 constables from the various

branches of the force, who were given a three years’ course of tuition

in English, and on Saturdays attended lectures on their duty to the

public, their powers under the Police Act, and matters of simple hygiene.

In 1913 the number of men attending the school had risen to 200, and the

master had been forced to obtain gratuitous assistance in teaching the

various classes. The question of accommodation also became urgent, and

during 1915 and 1916 the classes had to be assembled in the Elphinstone

Middle School, which the educational authorities allowed the police

to use during the early morning and evening hours. The men, who were

encouraged to study by the grant of small rewards and occasionally of

promotion, if they were successful in the periodical examinations,

derived distinct advantage from the school-course, and the number of

constables literate in the English language showed a steady increase

between 1911 and 1916. In the latter year 846 constables were reported

to be able to read and write, and 72 of them were literate in English.

Connected with the subject of education was the foundation of a fund

in the name of the Commissioner—the S. M. E. Memorial Fund—subscribed

by Hindu and Muhammadan residents, with the object of assisting Indian

constables of the force to educate their sons. The proposal was made in

the first instance by Mr. Kazi Kabiruddin, a barrister and Justice of the

Peace, and at his instance sufficient funds were subsequently provided

to admit of the grant of monthly scholarships and stipends to the sons

of constables attending primary schools maintained by the Municipal

Corporation.

A large amount of routine work devolved upon the police under the Arms,

Explosives, Petroleum and Poisons Acts. Under the Arms Act licenses of

various kinds were granted or cancelled, the shops and store-rooms of

licensed dealers were regularly inspected and their stocks checked,

and constant inquiries, numbering several thousand annually, were made

to verify purchases from local dealers and trace the whereabouts of

fire-arms. In 1911, just before the arrival of Their Majesties the King

and Queen, five revolvers were stolen from a licensed dealer’s shop.

The C. I. D. were successful in recovering the arms and in obtaining

the conviction of the thieves: but in consideration of the approach of

the Royal Visit, the Commissioner decided to take charge of the entire

stock of arms and ammunition held by five Indian dealers, and kept it

in deposit in the Head Police Office until after the departure of Their

Majesties. Under the Explosives Act licenses were issued for manufacture,

possession and sale; and magazines for the storage of explosives were

regularly inspected by the special branch maintained for this purpose

at headquarters. Similar duties were carried out under the Petroleum

Act; while from April 1st, 1909, the Police became responsible for

licensing the sale of poisons and checking stocks,—duties which up to

that date had been performed by the Municipality. The task of licensing

theatres and granting performance licenses, which was transferred to

the Arms department at the close of 1909, imposed a heavy additional

burden on the special staff. Most of the theatres at this date were

devoid of proper exits and of means of protection against fire, and these

seven years witnessed a continuous struggle to secure the erection of

fire-proof staircases etc. and the provision of fire-proof drop-curtains.

Fortunately the Police were able to obtain the help of the Chief of the

Fire-brigade and of the Government engineering and electrical experts,

in deciding what improvements were essential in each case, and it was

chiefly due to this collaboration that a better fire-service had been

installed by 1913 in each of the thirteen theatres of the City, and that

many important structural alterations in both theatres and cinematographs

had been introduced by the close of 1916. Perhaps the most notable

achievement of the headquarters staff under Chief Inspector M. J.

Giles was the preparation of a set of theatre rules, applicable to all

structures used for public performances, which were brought into force

in August 1914, and gave the police power to insist upon the provision

of fire-appliances, water supply, exits, and fire-proof materials. As

mentioned in a previous paragraph, the C. I. D. was made responsible for

the scrutiny of plays, for which a performance license was required,

and licenses were granted only to such plays as were declared by that

department to be unobjectionable on political, moral or general grounds.

The growth in the number of motor-vehicles continued unchecked and

ultimately necessitated the promulgation of new rules under the Motor

Vehicles Act in 1915. In 1909, the total number of motor-vehicles

registered since 1905 was 1,295, while in 1915 this figure had increased

to 4,947. But a good many of these gradually disappeared in the course

of ten years, and the actual number estimated to be on the roads in

1915 was 2,482 as compared with only 814 in 1909. Heavy motor-vehicles

of the lorry type also appeared during this period and numbered 70 in

1915. This increase of motor-traffic synchronized with, and was partly

responsible for, a steady increase in the number of street accidents.

While reckless driving was unquestionably the cause of many accidents,

despite energetic action in several directions to prevent it, the large

majority of the casualties reported from year to year were the outcome

of that carelessness and lack of alertness on the part of the average

Indian pedestrian, with which all who have driven cars or carriages in

Bombay are only too well acquainted. Accustomed as they are to the peace

of a sequestered country life, many of the foot-passengers in the streets

of the city seem totally unable to exercise any caution or to acquire

the habit of keeping to the side of the road, while in the case of the

mill-workers, whom one meets in Parel and elsewhere, the sense of hearing

seems to have been permanently dulled by the constant rattle and clatter

of the machinery at which they labour during the greater part of the day.

The Haj traffic continued to expand between 1909 and 1911, the total

number of pilgrims who left Bombay for Jeddah in those years being

19,748 and 21,965 respectively. From 1912 the numbers commenced to

decline until the year after the outbreak of the War, when the traffic

virtually ceased altogether. The period witnessed a struggle on the

part of a British shipping-firm to secure the monopoly of the Red Sea

trade, including the pilgrim traffic, by ousting the few Muhammadan-owned

vessels which had hitherto catered for the pilgrims. The firm in question

was unquestionably in a position to offer better vessels and a better

organization for the return journey than the Indian ship-owners: but

one or two of the latter resented the effort to drive them out of the

traffic, with the result that the Commissioner of Police and the Pilgrim

department, who endeavoured to act in a strictly neutral manner, ran

the risk of blame from both parties for showing undue preference to

their rivals. At the moment of the Declaration of War all the vessels

engaged in the traffic were owned by the British firm, except one or at

most two which belonged to a well-known Muhammadan resident. It might

have been supposed that, considering the wholly Islamic character of

the pilgrimage, a British firm would have acquiesced in the continued

presence of a Muhammadan-owned vessel, and have trusted to time and the

ordinary economic law for its ultimate disappearance from the Jeddah

route. Such, however, was not the case; and at the instance of the local

manager of the firm, a pushing Scot from Aberdeen, the Bombay Government

was asked practically to insist upon the Commissioner and the Pilgrim

department refusing all facilities to the Muhammadan ship-owner to sell

his tickets and dispatch his vessel. The outbreak of War in 1914, and the

consequent cessation of the traffic to and from Jeddah, solved a dispute

which for some time imposed additional work upon the Police and Pilgrim

authorities.

The Finger Print Bureau steadily maintained its efficiency and had

compiled a record of more than 45,000 slips by the end of 1915. At the

request of the municipal authorities, it commenced about 1912 to take the

finger-impressions of hundreds of candidates for employment as sweepers

in the Health department, and was able to prove annually from its records

that a certain proportion of these people had previous convictions under

the Penal Code. In another direction—revolver-practice by the European

police—a considerable improvement was effected. Up to 1914 it was

customary to arrange for the practice in a field at the back of the China

Mill at Sewri, which was sufficiently remote and secluded to obviate

danger to the public. But the distance of the site from the centre of

the City rendered the regular attendance of all officers practically

impossible, and in consequence, on the rare occasions when the European

police were called upon to use their revolvers at disturbances, their

shooting was inclined to be a trifle erratic. In the Muharram riots

of 1908, for example, when Mr. Gell ordered the European officers to

fire on the mob in Bhendy Bazar, a Parsi who was watching the rioting

from the window of a third upper-storey was unfortunately killed by

a revolver-shot, directed at the crowd in the street. To ensure more

regular practice by all officers, therefore, the Commissioner obtained

the approval of Government to the erection of a safety revolver range in

the compound of the Head Police Office, which was opened in September,

1914.

Before dealing with the record of crime, a brief reference is desirable

to the extraordinary volume of miscellaneous work performed under the

orders of the Commissioner. Derelict children were constantly being

picked up in the streets by the divisional police and forwarded to the

Head Office, when the Commissioner had to make the best arrangements he

could for their maintenance and welfare; penniless women and children

were repatriated to various parts of India, to Persia, Mauritius,

Egypt, South Africa and Singapore, with funds collected by the Police

Office for each individual case from charitable townspeople; penurious

women were assisted to get their daughters married, and on one occasion

a Muhammadan and his wife, who desired a divorce and applied for

police assistance, were granted facilities for the ceremony at police

headquarters. On another occasion the Commissioner was asked to assist in

the rebuilding of a mosque belonging to the Sidis or African Musalmans

of Tandel Street, and was able to obtain the necessary funds from

several well-to-do Muhammadans in the city. The Police dealt also with

a large number of lunatics; they traced deserters from the Army and

Navy; they made inquiries into the condition of second-class hotels and

drinking bars in the European quarter and took action, when necessary, in

consultation with the Excise authorities; they dealt with a very large

number of prostitutes under the Police Act. The number of summonses which

they were called upon to serve annually on behalf of magisterial courts

in Bombay and other Provinces was enormous, and their work in connexion

with the grant of certificates of identity to persons proceeding to

Europe, with the grant of passes for processions and for playing music in

the streets, and of permits to enter the Ballard Pier on the arrival and

departure of the English mail-steamer, was heavy and continuous. Appeals

for unofficial assistance from private individuals and from societies

like the League of Mercy, engaged in rescue-work among women, were also

never refused. Miscellaneous activities of this varied type formed no

small portion of the annual task of the force and were rendered effective

by the close collaboration of the staff at headquarters, the C. I. D.,

and the divisional police.

The difficulty of providing suitable shelter and guardianship for the

many derelict girls of tender age found wandering in the streets by

the police led directly to the foundation by the Commissioner of the

Abdulla Haji Daud Bavla Muhammadan Girls’ Orphanage. With the possible

exception of one or two Christian missionary institutions, to which it

would have been impolitic on political and religious grounds to send

children, no organization or society existed in 1909, which was prepared

to take charge of homeless girls. Consequently, many little waifs

gravitated into the brothels of the city or were gradually absorbed in

the floating criminal population. Moreover, when a child was found in

the streets, homeless and friendless, the police had no shelter to offer

her except the cells at the sectional police-station; and these, being

regularly filled with the dregs of the criminal population, were a most

undesirable environment for girls of tender years. As caste-prejudices

offered peculiar obstacles to any scheme for the benefit of Hindu girls

belonging to the Shudra class, the Commissioner determined to concentrate

his attention upon a home for Muhammadan girls, and accordingly drew up

a scheme and issued an appeal, which was widely circulated among the

Muhammadan community. The appeal was favourably received, and about 2

lakhs of rupees were collected within a few weeks. To this sum were

added more than 3 lakhs from the estate of the late Abdulla Haji Daud

Bavla, whose executors offered the amount on condition that the orphanage

should bear his name, that his trustees should be represented on the

managing committee of the orphanage, and that the objects, constitution

and maintenance etc. of the orphanage should be embodied in a legal deed

of trust. At the request of the Commissioner, the Bombay Government

agreed to become a party to the deed and bound themselves to appoint

the Commissioner of Police, or any other of their officers resident for

the time being in Bombay, as chairman of the board of trustees of the

orphanage. The legal preliminaries having been completed and the funds

duly invested in gilt-edged securities, a suitable building was taken

on a lease, and furnished at the expense of a philanthropic Muhammadan

merchant, and in December, 1910, the orphanage was formally opened by

Sir George Clarke (now Lord Sydenham) and Lady Clarke. The institution

soon justified its existence; the number of girl-inmates steadily

increased, their physical health and welfare being under the general

supervision of a trustworthy Englishwoman, and their religious exercises

and elementary lessons being given by a Mullani and her assistants. The

problem of the girls’ future was solved in the only feasible way by

arranging for their marriage with Muhammadans of their own class, as

soon as they reached the age of maturity. These hymeneal arrangements

were made by a chosen officer of the C. I. D., Khan Saheb M. F. Taki,

in consultation with the _jamats_ and leaders of the various Musalman

sections. Experience has proved that the establishment of institutions

like this Muhammadan Girls’ Orphanage is an essential preliminary to any

serious effort to combat the deplorable traffic in children, which still

flourishes in India and constitutes the chief means of recruitment for

the brothels of the larger towns and cities.

This period witnessed a steady increase in crime up to 1915, when the

stringent measures taken during the pendency of the War to clear the

City of undesirables imposed a notable check upon the normal increase

in reported crime. Previous to that date the rapid increase in recorded

crime was the natural result of the changes which took place in the

force after 1909, and particularly of the improvement in registration

which followed the introduction of the new divisional police-stations.

Not only did these stations offer increased facilities for the reporting

and detection of crime, but it was also impossible under the new system

for cases to escape registration and final inclusion in the returns.

The improvement in the registration of cases was manifested also in a

marked diminution of the number of complaints classed as made under a

misapprehension of law or fact. By 1916 the sanctioned strength of the

police force had been augmented by one-third since 1906, and this fact

by itself would have sufficed to account for a large increase in the

amount of crime brought to light. When coupled with the reorganization of

the various police-stations, each of which was furnished with a strong

registering and investigating staff, the increase in recorded crime

became inevitable. It was likewise due to more accurate estimates of the

value of property stolen that the percentage of recovery declined from 56

in 1908 to about 40 in succeeding years.

Murder and attempts at murder were still deplorably frequent, including

cases of infanticide which are extremely difficult to detect in an

Oriental city. The number of murder cases varied from 16 in 1909 to 31 in

1910, 25 in 1911, 31 in 1912, and 24 in both 1913 and 1915. The largest

number, 35, occurred in 1914. The most notable murder was that of a

young and wealthy Bhattia widow, residing in her own house on Malabar

Hill. Her husband, Lakhmidas Khimji, who had died some time previously

in circumstances which gave rise to ill-founded rumour, had been a

well-known figure in Indian commercial circles. His widow Jamnabai, was

brutally strangled by a gang of six men from northern India, two of whom

belonged to well-known criminal tribes in the United Provinces and a

third was a night-watchman in the employ of a Jain resident on Malabar

Hill. At first there appeared to be no clue whatever to the crime; but

a few days after its occurrence the commissioner received an anonymous

letter in Hindi, which was translated for him by the Subehdar of the

Armed Police, who happened to be a north-Indian Brahman conversant with

that language. The letter, which was written by one of the criminals

in revenge for not receiving what he regarded as a fair share of the

ornaments stolen from the widow’s house, gave sufficient details to

enable the Police to arrest five of the gang the same evening. The sixth

accused was subsequently arrested at Bassein. All of them were placed on

trial for murder and convicted.

By the year 1909, the vice of cocaine-eating had attained an

extraordinary hold upon the lower classes of the population. Women and

even children had fallen victims to a habit which plainly exercised a

deplorable effect upon their health and morals. The supplies of the drug

came in the first instance from Germany in packets bearing the name

of Merk, and were frequently smuggled into India in ways that defied

detection. Moreover the traffic in the drug, which was international in

character, was so cleverly organized that it was practically impossible

to trace and prosecute the importers and distributors. Action was

therefore confined to prosecuting the smaller fry for the offences of

illicit sale and possession, and the majority of such cases occurred

in the notorious Nal Bazar area of the C division, which for the last

thirty or forty years has sheltered a large population of disreputables.

The Police were not held primarily responsible for the control of the

cocaine-traffic. This duty devolved upon the Collector of Bombay, who

maintained a large and well-paid excise staff for the purpose.[115]

But the obligation which rested on the police to assist the excise

authorities as far as possible, and the direct stimulus to crime provided

by the cocaine-habit, rendered the question of combating the traffic of

more than ordinary importance. With this in view, the Commissioner in

1909 put a special police-cordon on the area devoted to the traffic for

about six weeks. This produced satisfactory results for the time being,

but had to be abandoned, to allow of the men reverting to their regular

duties which suffered by their absence. In 1911 a second attempt was

made to restrict the evil by placing a European Inspector and a staff of

constables on special duty in the C division for a period of about two

months, during which nearly 600 individuals were caught and convicted

by the courts. These incursions into the area of the retail-traffic were

not the only successes achieved by the police. In 1911 the Dock Police

arrested an Austrian steward of the S. S. _Africa_ with 300 grains of

cocaine concealed in the soles of his boots; in 1912 the Superintendent

of the Harbour Police secured the arrest of a fireman from a German

merchant-ship with 40 lbs. of the drug, valued at Rs. 45,500, in his

possession; another large consignment, valued at Rs. 17,000 was traced

by Khan Saheb M. H. Taki and Khan Saheb F. M. Taki of the C. I. D. to a

house in Doctor Street in 1913; and on two occasions Indian constables on

duty in the Docks arrested on suspicion persons belonging to vessels in

the harbour, with large quantities of the drug concealed on their person.

It cannot be asserted, however, that these arrests and prosecutions

secured any real diminution of the traffic from abroad. They did upset

the local market for the drug, and interfered temporarily with the supply

of the tiny paper packets sold in the darker corners of the C division.

The traffickers were not thereby daunted, for when the real article was

difficult to procure, they palmed off powdered magnesia and Epsom salts

on their unfortunate victims, who were naturally unable to complain of

the deception. The first real check to the traffic was provided by the

drastic restrictions on imports and exports imposed after the declaration

of War in 1914, and by the sudden cessation of the continental steamship

companies’ traffic between Europe and the East. At a comparatively recent

date the question of the traffic in cocaine has been discussed at Geneva

under the auspices of the League of Nations, and the view seems to be

generally accepted that the evil can only be adequately countered by

stringent supervision of the primary sources of supply and joint action

on the part of all the States concerned.

Of the many important criminal cases successfully investigated by the

Police during these seven years, a few deserve special mention. In

1910 and 1911 some very seditious books were brought to the notice of

the Bombay Government by certain persons to whom they had been sent

anonymously. In the course of their inquiries the Police discovered a

large store of these books at Navsari in the Baroda State, and also

secured proof that the books were printed at Mehsana in the same

territory. A prominent Indian pleader of Kaira, who was concerned in

their distribution, was prosecuted and duly convicted. H. H. the Gaekwar

of Baroda was in England at the time of the inquiry; but on his return

he deported the author of the books, who was one of his own subjects,

for a period of five years. In 1912 the police successfully dealt with

a swindler named Amratlal, who had victimised a firm of jewellers in

Germany to the extent of nearly 2 lakhs of rupees, and they also detected

the perpetrator of a series of thefts on board the P. and O. Company’s

ships, including a case of tampering with the mails. In the following

year the premises of the well-known firm of Messrs Ewart, Latham and

Company were destroyed by fire. Immediately after the fire, a stolen

cheque filled in for Rs. 10,826 and bearing a forged signature, was

presented at a bank for payment and cashed. One of the firm’s employés

was eventually arrested and charged with the offences of theft, cheating

and forgery, the police investigation establishing also the moral

certainty that the accused had set fire to the office in the hope of

obliterating all trace of his crime. The accused was committed to the

Sessions, where a peculiarly stupid jury, failing to appreciate the

evidence, brought in a verdict of “not guilty.” The presiding Judge

discharged the accused and passed severe comments on the perversity

displayed by the jury. A case, which contained elements of both tragedy

and comedy, concerned the marriage of a Koli girl, about 9 years old, to

a sexagenarian Bania. Three Hindus, acting on the principle that love is

blind, falsely represented that the girl was a Bania, and thereby induced

the elderly Lothario to pay Rs. 1,500 for the privilege of wedding the

girl. After the marriage the old gentleman discovered the deception

practised upon him, and made a formal complaint to the police, who traced

the three culprits and secured the conviction of two of them.

In 1914 the embezzlement of Rs. 1,000, representing the fees paid by

students at the Government Law School, led to the arrest and conviction

of a clerk on the school staff, who was proved in the course of the

police-inquiry to have embezzled no less than Rs. 12,000 between

the years 1902 and 1912. At the request of the police of the United

Provinces, two charges of filing false civil suits, with the object of

avoiding payment of sums due by them, were successfully proved against

natives of upper India; and these were followed by an equally long and

intricate inquiry into a case of cheating, in which three Hindus, one

of whom had a local reputation as a palmist and astrologer, persuaded

two Bhandaris of Bombay to pay them Rs. 4,000, on condition that they

would use their supposed influence with the excise authorities to

obtain two liquor-licenses for their dupes. In 1915 the Bohra thief and

house-breaker, Tyebali, whose conviction during Mr. Gell’s _régime_

has already been mentioned, completed his term of imprisonment and

recommenced his thieving exploits. After committing several thefts from

houses in Nepean Sea road he was caught, convicted and sentenced to

a fresh term of six years’ imprisonment. All the stolen property was

recovered from a Bohra receiver, who worked with Tyebali. In September

of the same year information was received from the Director of Criminal

Intelligence, Delhi, that three valuable Persian manuscripts had been

stolen from the library of Nawab Sir Salar Jung Bahadur at Hyderabad.

After a lengthy inquiry the Bombay police traced one of the manuscripts,

a _Shahnama_, with illuminated headings and illustrations in colours and

gold, which was declared by experts to be an artistic treasure of immense

value. A chance remark furnished a clue to the whereabouts of the

manuscript, which was in due course returned to its owner in Hyderabad.

Anonymous communications are exceedingly common in India, and as a rule

it is practically impossible to trace their authorship. A case of this

type, which presented unusual features, was successfully investigated by

the police in 1915. For more than two years a series of objectionable and

defamatory postcards and letters had been received by high officials,

prominent Indians, and clubs. Any event of public interest during that

period resulted in a shower of these typed communications, which were

always very scurrilous and occasionally flagrantly indecent. They were

addressed not only to residents of Bombay, but to officials in other

parts of India also, to the Governor, the Viceroy and even to members of

the Royal Family in England. The C.I.D. had been able to establish the

fact that all the cards and letters were typed on a single machine of a

particular and well-known make; and having done that, they proceeded,

with the approval of the postal authorities, to subject all the postcards

received in the General Post Office to close scrutiny throughout a

period of several weeks. At length their patience was rewarded. A card

was found, which on careful scrutiny was seen to have been typed on the

missing machine, and as it was an ordinary and _bona fide_ business

communication it was not difficult to locate the machine. It proved to

be the property of a well-known Indian merchant, and further inquiry

rendered it certain that he was the author of the anonymous cards. He was

therefore arrested and released on bail. While the Police were collecting

further evidence to support the charge against him, the accused, who had

many influential friends, confessed his guilt to one of them and asked

his advice. The friend advised him to make a clean breast of the whole

matter to the Commissioner of Police and throw himself on his mercy. This

he agreed at the moment, but in the end failed, to do and a few days

later, while ostensibly endeavouring to light a gas-stove with a bottle

of methylated spirit, he was so severely burned about the body that he

died in a few hours. The case caused some commotion in the community, to

which the accused belonged, and the Commissioner was urged to refrain at

the inquest on the deceased from any allusion to the criminal inquiry

into the authorship of the postcards. But this the Commissioner refused

to do, in view of the wild rumours about the case which were being

spread about the City, some of which placed the police in a false and

undesirable position. It was doubtless satisfactory to the friends of the

deceased that the Coroner’s jury found themselves able to pronounce a

verdict of accidental death. It only remains to add that after the arrest

of the accused the plague of anonymous postcards entirely ceased.

The criminal record of these years would be incomplete without a

reference to the collapse in 1913 of a number of Indian banks. The most

notable of all, the Indian Specie Bank, was never made the subject

of a criminal investigation, though the apathy of its Directors was

unquestionable, and its manager, who had set out to “corner” silver

against the Indian Government with the monies of the bank’s depositors,

found it desirable, when the crash came, to die suddenly at Bandora.

Orders were issued by the Bombay Government to the Police to investigate

the transactions of several lesser banks and bring the guilty to trial;

and accordingly a protracted and intricate inquiry was commenced by

Inspector Morris of the C. I. D. into the accounts and balance-sheets of

the Credit Bank, the Bombay Banking Company and the Cosmopolitan Bank.

In the case of the first-named bank, charges of criminal breach of trust

and falsification of accounts were proved against the manager, who was

sentenced in 1914 to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment, while the manager

of the Bombay Banking Company and his nephew were likewise convicted of

criminal breach of trust and cheating and sentenced to varying terms

of imprisonment with hard labour. In the third case the police proved

clearly that the bank was not a bank at all, and had neither funds,

business nor influence; but the manager and the “bank’s” broker, who

were charged by the police with cheating, were eventually discharged

by the trying magistrate. These bank-failures were not confined to

Bombay, but took place in other Provinces also, notably in the Punjab.

When the collapse commenced, an attempt was made to draw some of the

European-managed banks into the vortex, with the object of showing that

the failures were due rather to general economic conditions than to bad

management. The attempt failed; for the Scotchmen, who form ninety per

cent of the European banking community in India, were too cautious and

too solidly entrenched to succumb to any artificial panic, and despite

the assertion of some Indian politicians that the European-managed banks,

by withholding assistance from these mushroom Indian concerns, had

deliberately precipitated the crisis, the general conclusion was that the

failures were primarily due to careless or fraudulent management. This

view found confirmation in the verdicts delivered in the Courts.

The collapse of at least one bank was due to the uncontrolled habit

of speculation which has always distinguished the City of Bombay. Few

persons now remain who can remember the famous Share Mania of the early

’sixties: but the spirit of gambling which underlay that colossal

financial fiasco is still alive and manifests itself from time to time in

wild speculation in the cotton and share markets. The abnormal readiness

of the average Indian to follow the lead of any man of outstanding

personality, and the ease with which credit is obtained and renewed

in Indian circles only serve to aggravate the evil. The suicide of

Mr. Dwarkadas Dharamsey, a leading Bhattia mill-agent and merchant,

in September, 1909, provided an example of the latitude allowed to

one whose financial position had for several years been very unsound.

Dwarkadas Dharamsey was a man of great mental capacity, but devoid of

scruple. He occupied a leading position in the mercantile and social

world, was well-known on the race-course as an owner of horses, was a

member of the Municipal Corporation and of the Board of the Improvement

Trust, and had been appointed Sheriff of Bombay two or three years before

his death. Yet in the very heyday of his prosperity he was spending more

than he possessed, staving off importunate demands by all manner of

temporary expedients, and juggling with the funds of the mills of which

he was director and agent. Faced at last with almost complete insolvency

and unable to raise further funds, he shot himself with a revolver

at his house in the Fort. He left a kind of confession behind him in

which he explained the reason for his action and referred in ambiguous

language to some greater crime that he had committed. Though various

conjectures were made as to the nature of this act, no definite solution

was ever forthcoming. His secret died with him. Immediately after his

death, the police discovered that the operatives of his four mills had

not been paid their wages for two months, and owing to the closing of

the mills they were left stranded and unemployed. With the assistance

of Mr. R. D. Sethna, the Official Receiver, the Commissioner was able

to get the mill-hands’ wages treated as a first charge on the estate

of the deceased, and within a short time the wages due to the men were

liquidated under Mr. Sethna’s orders.

On several occasions Indian constables distinguished themselves by

acts of bravery and examples of professional acumen. The detection of

a burglary in the showroom of an English firm was due entirely to the

action of a Hindu constable, who noticed on a piece of furniture the

mark of a foot possessing certain peculiarities, which he remembered

having seen before in the foot of an ex-convict. Another Hindu constable

grappled with a European who had stabbed a townsman, and though severely

wounded in the stomach and bleeding profusely, managed to pursue the

offender and hold him down till help came. On three other occasions

Indian constables sustained severe wounds, when grappling single-handed

with armed Pathans and others, and on each occasion they clung to the

prisoner until his arrest was secured. Several instances occurred of

women and children being saved from drowning, and in two cases the men

were rewarded with the bronze medal of the Royal Humane Society. The

action of a young Hindu constable, who had been only three months in

the force, deserves more detailed description. About 3 a.m. one morning

in August, 1912, a Punjab Muhammadan murdered his comrade in a room in

Bapty road. The murder was not discovered till some time afterwards. At

4 a.m. the constable on duty at the junction of Falkland and Foras roads

saw a man hurrying in a suspicious manner through the shadows towards

Gilder street. He stopped and questioned him; and, his suspicions being

aroused, decided to search the man. The fugitive offered the constable

a bribe of Rs. 5, Rs. 10 and finally Rs. 30 to let him go; but the

constable arrested him and marched him to the Nagpada police station,

where a report of the murder had by that time been received. It was then

found that the arrested fugitive was the murderer, and that the money

with which he had tried to bribe the constable was stained with blood

and formed part of the sum which he had stolen from his victim. Further

investigation proved beyond doubt that the murdered man had himself

stolen the money from an Englishman in Mussoorie. A unique case, in

which an accused asked permission of the Magistrate to pay a reward to

the constable who arrested him, occurred in 1914. The prisoner, on being

questioned, explained that, owing to his timely arrest, he had managed to

retain possession of a sum of money, of which he would certainly have

been robbed by the disorderly persons with whom he was consorting at the

time the constable locked him up.

Among the special events of these years which imposed extra work for the

time being on the Police were the Nasik murder and conspiracy trials in

the High Court in 1910, the visit of Lord Minto in 1909, the arrival of

Lord Hardinge and the visit of the ex-German Crown Prince in 1910, and

the arrival of Lord Chelmsford in 1916. For the first time on record,

the Mounted Police under their European officers were permitted to form

part of the escort both of Lord Minto and the German Crown Prince, and,

riding grey Arabs in their handsome full-dress uniform, they provided not

the least showy part of the spectacle. These Viceregal progresses from

the railway terminus or the Apollo Bandar to Malabar Hill had changed

in character since the beginning of the twentieth century. Formerly the

route chosen for the arrival of a new Viceroy or the departure of his

predecessor lay as a matter of course through Kalbadevi road and Bhendy

Bazaar, and thence by way of Grant road, or later Sandhurst road, to

Chaupati and Walkeshwar. No particular precautions were taken, for none

were deemed necessary; the people were well-disposed and always ready to

welcome the King’s representative as he was driven through the heart of

the Indian quarters. But as the anarchical and revolutionary movement

spread and attempts were made upon the lives even of Viceroys, the old

route through the city was, except for very special reasons, gradually

abandoned, and the incoming and departing potentates were escorted along

the safer route of Queen’s road. The distance of this thoroughfare from

the heart of the City, and the growing nonchalance of the majority of the

inhabitants in regard to Viceregal appearances in public, were naturally

responsible for an absence of sight-seers on the processional route, and

at times there were few persons to be seen except the foot-police lining

the sides of the road. On the occasion of Lord Chelmsford’s arrival in

April, 1916, one of the Superintendents, through whose division a portion

of the route passed, determined to keep up appearances of loyal welcome,

by collecting the necessary crowd at Sandhurst Bridge and instructing

them beforehand in the art of hand-clapping and other manifestations

of popular satisfaction. As it was obviously impossible to impress

respectable householders and others for this duty, the sectional officers

were instructed to shepherd their bad characters of both sexes to the

fixed point, after arranging that they all donned clean clothes and were

paid 2 annas apiece for their trouble. The plan worked well. As the new

Viceroy’s carriage swept out of Queen’s road on to the bridge, the signal

was given and a hearty burst of hand-clapping, punctured with cries of

_shabash_, rose from the little crowd of disreputables at the corner.

No one knew who they were, except the police who had hunted them out

of their haunts a few hours previously: and the Viceroy was doubtless

gratified at this signal expression of welcome. When the last of the

escort had passed, the unfortunates were taken back to their quarter and

there set free to resume their ordinary and less harmless avocations.

There was no need of artificial welcomes of this character when Their

Majesties visited Bombay in 1911, or at their final departure in

1912. They drove through the heart of the City; and both in the wide

thoroughfares of the European business-quarter and in the narrower

streets of the Indian city they were affectionately greeted and welcomed

by thousands of their subjects of all castes and creeds. Their progress

was, indeed, a triumph. The choice of the route had not been settled

without some doubt and misgiving. The authorities in England declared

that the royal procession must not pass along any road of less than

a certain width: the Commissioner of Police pointed out that this

restriction would entirely debar Their Majesties from entering the City

north of Carnac road. The restriction was therefore waived, on condition

that the Police adopted all possible measures to render the route

completely secure. This by no means easy task was achieved by the C. I.

D. and the divisional police, of whom the former spent the three months

preceding the Royal Visit in mapping out the houses on the route, making

themselves acquainted with all the inmates, posting plain-clothes men and

agents in the upper-storeys, and keeping a daily register of arrivals

and departures. In one or two cases the divisional police, whose duties

lay in holding the route and directing traffic, imposed even stricter

conditions than the C. I. D., as the following incident proves. Three

or four days before Their Majesties’ arrival, an elderly Muhammadan

woman of the lower class visited the Head Police Office and asked for an

interview with the Commissioner. Her request was granted; and on being

shown in, she informed the Commissioner that she occupied a room in the

upper-storey of a house near the junction of Sandhurst and Parel roads,

and that she desired permission to look out of her window at the royal

procession. “But,” said the Commissioner, “you need no permission for

that.” “Yes, Huzur, I do”, she answered; “the section-wala (_i.e._ the

officer in charge of a police-station) says that unless I obtain a permit

I must keep my window shut on the day”. It was clearly useless to argue

with the old lady, who was honestly bent upon obtaining _darshan_ of the

_Padshah_. The Commissioner, therefore, wrote out the following pass in

his own hand, signed it, and sent her away satisfied:—

“To all Police Officers and those whom it may concern.

This is to certify that Aminabai, living in House No. —— ————

street, second floor, is hereby granted permission to look

out of her own window at His Majesty the King-Emperor, on the

occasion of the Royal Progress through Bombay on December 2nd.

1911.

S. M. Edwardes,

_Commissioner of Police_.”

As an additional precaution the Commissioner of Police asked the Bombay

Government to invest him with special magisterial powers, which would

enable him to deal summarily with persons of bad character, whose liberty

it might be necessary to curtail during the period of the Royal Visit.

The request having been granted, the Commissioner proceeded to remand

to jail the majority of the well-known hooligans and bad characters,

to the number of 400. Fully another three hundred persons with guilty

consciences decided to leave Bombay for a holiday up-country, in the

belief that they would be sent to jail if they stayed in the City. In

this way the City was cleared of seven or eight hundred of its worst

characters, and the daily crime returns subsequently proved that the

action thus taken produced a very marked diminution of crime during the

period of the Royal Visit. Moreover, respectable townspeople, learning

of the incarceration of the criminal classes, were able to leave their

houses freely at night to visit the illuminations, without fear of

burglaries occurring in their absence or of having their pockets picked

in the crowd. Political offenders, who usually belonged to a higher

stratum of society, were treated differently. In one or two cases they

were remanded to jail for treatment as first-class misdemeanants: but

the majority were given the option of spending a fortnight in some

place chosen by themselves, the police of that place being warned of

their arrival and of the need of keeping them under surveillance. In

one instance a _détenu_ asked to be allowed to visit Ceylon, which he

had never seen, and he was accordingly sent there in company with a

plain-clothes officer of the C. I. D., who duly escorted him back again

at the end of fifteen days. The entire absence of any protest on the

part of the public or the Indian press against the Commissioner’s action

shows that the powers were wielded cautiously and that special measures

of this kind were generally accepted as appropriate to the occasion. The

wholesale disappearance for the time being of the criminal and hooligan

element certainly contributed to the peaceful and orderly progress of

the Visit, and produced an immediate and marked decline of crime, which

enabled the police to concentrate all their attention on the special

arrangements for the functions held during Their Majesties’ stay.

Both before and during the Royal Visit, the Police received much help

from the public. There was scarcely a householder who did not willingly

undertake to carry out the suggestions of the police, and a large number

of people, drawn from various classes and communities, volunteered to

serve as special constables during the Visit. As to the manner in which

the police force itself performed its heavy work, it will suffice to

quote the words of the Governor-in-Council, who was “commanded to express

to the Police of the City of Bombay His Imperial Majesty’s ‘entire

satisfaction with the admirable police arrangements made during His

Imperial Majesty’s recent visit to Bombay and with the manner in which

they were carried out’”. In recognition of the exemplary performance

of heavy additional duties, all ranks of the force, from inspectors

downwards, received a special bonus, equivalent to ten days’ pay. Four

Superintendents and three Inspectors received the medal of the Royal

Victorian Order from the King-Emperor himself.

The subject of cotton-fires at the Colaba Green was revived by the

disastrous epidemic of fires in the cold weather of 1913-14. As

previously mentioned, a special committee was appointed by Government,

with the Commissioner of Police as chairman, to enquire into the origin

of the fires and suggest precautions for the future. The report of this

committee, which found that the weight of evidence pointed to wholesale

incendiarism, was submitted only a few weeks before the outbreak of

War in 1914, and consequently received early burial in the records of

the Secretariat. The deductions of the Committee were strengthened to

some extent by the inquiries carried out by the C. I. D. during 1914.

A thorough examination of the books of various companies established

beyond a shadow of doubt that large fortunes had been made over the

fires by persons in the cotton trade, as a result of fraudulent dealing,

mixing and classification of cotton. This system of dishonesty had been

facilitated by slack methods of insurance, which in turn were rendered

profitable by clever underwriting. It is doubtful whether these little

‘idiosyncrasies’ of the Bombay cotton market will ever be wholly

eradicated.

It is possible that long after the details of the reorganization of

the police force have passed into oblivion, Mr. Edwardes’ tenure of

office will be remembered for the abolition of the dangerous and rowdy

side of the annual Muharram celebration. At the time he was appointed

Commissioner, the Muharram, which had been a cause of excitement and

anxiety from the days of Forjett, had degenerated into an annual scandal

and become a menace to the peace of the city. No respectable Musalman

took part in the annual procession of _tabuts_, nor would permit his

family to visit the _tazias_ and _tabuts_ during the ten days of the

festival, for fear of insult and annoyance from the _badmashes_ and

hooligans, who chose the sites of the _tabuts_ in the various _mohollas_

as their gathering-ground. The cost of building and decorating each

_tazia_ and _tabut_ was defrayed by a public subscription, which

had degenerated into pure and simple blackmail, levied by the less

respectable denizens of each _moholla_ upon the general public. The

Marwadi and other Hindu merchants suffered particularly from this

practice; at times they were threatened with physical injury if they did

not subscribe; on other occasions the collecting-party, composed of four

or five Muhammadan roughs, would visit the shops of the Jain merchants,

carrying a dead rat, and threaten to drop it into the heaps of grain and

sugar if the shop-owner did not forthwith hand out a fair sum. By the

exercise of pressure and threats, some _mohollas_ contrived to raise

comparatively large sums, aggregating several hundred rupees, and as

only a fractional portion of this money was required to defray the cost

of the _tabut_ and the paraphernalia of the final procession, the balance

was devoted to the support of the hooligans of the _mohollas_ during

the following few months. Attached to each _tabut_, and accompanying

it whenever it was carried out in procession, was a _toli_ or band of

attendants, usually varying in numbers from 50 to 200 and composed of

the riff-raff of the lower quarters. In some cases these _tolis_ had

been gradually allowed to assume a gigantic size, as for example that

of the Julhai weavers of Ripon road (Madanpura), which comprised from

two to three thousand men, all armed with _lathis_ tipped with brass or

lead. Similarly the notorious Rangari _moholla_ (Abdul Rehman street),

Halai Memon _moholla_, Kolsa _moholla_ and Chuna Batti _moholla_, could

count upon turning out several thousand followers, armed with sticks and

staves, who could be trusted to render a good account of themselves if

there was a breach of the public peace.

The time-honoured sectarian enmity between Sunni and Shia usually showed

itself by the second day of the festival, in the form of insults hurled

at the Bohras (Shias) by the Sunni rag-tag and bobtail in the various

streets occupied by the former. The most notorious of these centres of

disturbance was Doctor Street, which debouched into Grant road opposite

Sulliman _chauki_; but none of the Bohra quarters were safe from

disturbance; and year after year Bohra merchants had to leave Bombay

during the festival, or had to secure special protection, and even had to

disguise their women in male attire, in the hope of thereby minimising

the chance of insult by the lower-class Sunnis. Muharram rioting, which

had become much too frequent during the first decade of this century,

usually commenced with a fracas of some sort between Sunnis and Bohras,

in which the former were generally the aggressors; and when the Police

intervened to restore order, the mob on one pretext or another declared

war against them with the inevitable result. The Sunni hooligans would

never have reached the pitch of insolence which marked their behaviour in

1910, had they not felt assured that they had the support of the leading

Sunnis residing in the _mohollas_, many of whom, though comparatively

wealthy, were almost illiterate and totally uncultured; and the latter

in turn were prompted to foster the more rowdy and disreputable aspects

of the festival by the belief that the Moslem community thereby acquired

more importance, even though of a sinister character, in the eyes of

Government, and that the possibility of disturbance could be occasionally

used as a lever to secure consideration or concessions in other

directions.

This belief was partly confirmed by the attitude of the authorities,

who persisted in attaching undue weight to the religious character of

the festival,—a character which had practically ceased to have any

influence on the celebrants, and in accordance with the time-honoured

principle of strict religious neutrality showed great reluctance to

impose any restrictions upon the celebration. The Police, who in times

of disturbance often reaped a fair harvest of tips and presents from

timorous townspeople who desired protection from mob-violence, and who

also discovered in the aftermath of rioting an easy means of paying off

old scores, had never troubled to explain to Government the precise

character and danger of the annual Muharram. The old doctrine of “the

safety-valve” was still in favour, with the result that during the

concluding days of the festival Bombay used to witness the spectacle

of police officers of the upper ranks urging the most uncompromising

rascals to lift the _tabuts_ and form the processions, regardless of the

fact that at any other season of the year they would not have hesitated

to lock up most of these disreputables at sight. In short, under the

cloak of religion, the worst elements in the bazaar were permitted to

burst their bounds for ten days and flow over the central portion of

the City in a current of excessive turbulence, to terrorize the peaceful

householder and to play intolerable mischief in the streets. If the

leaders and wire-pullers decided that there should be a disturbance,

culminating in a conflict with the police, all they had to do was to

pass the order to the various _mohollas_ not to “lift” their _tabuts_ on

the tenth day and to the Bara Imam shrine in Khoja street not to send

out the _sandal_-procession on the ninth night. This latter procession

was, so to speak, the barometer of the Muharram, and its non-appearance

in the streets invariably indicated storm. Once it had been decided not

to “lift” the _tabuts_, the huge _tolis_, which should have accompanied

them to their final immersion in the sea, were let loose in the streets

with nothing to do, and a breach of the peace was rendered practically

inevitable. When this point was reached on the last day, it was customary

for the Afghans and Pathans, residing in the B division, to collect in

groups in the lanes behind Parel road (Bhendy Bazar), and at the right

moment to commence looting and setting fire to shops. In the Muharram

riots of 1908 it was these people who set fire to a shop on Parel road

and threw a Hindu constable into the middle of the flames. The only

unobjectionable feature of the old Muharram was the _Waaz_ or religious

discourse, which was delivered nightly in each of the leading _mohollas_

by a chosen _Maulvi_ or _Mulla_. Unfortunately these were very little

patronized by the hooligans and damaged characters, who composed the

_tolis_ and monopolized the celebration of the festival in the streets.

Mr. Edwardes’ first Muharram in 1910 ended without an actual breach of

the peace: but the behaviour of the _mohollas_ was so insolent, and

the license and obscenity displayed by the mob were so intolerable,

particularly in the Bohra quarter of the C division, that he determined

to impose restrictions at the Muharram of January, 1911. Accordingly

in December, 1910, he issued a notification closing Doctor Street and

the neighbouring lanes running parallel with it to all processionists

throughout the period of the festival, and from the first night he

placed a strong cordon of police round the prohibited area, to prevent

any attempt by the mob to break the order. Practically the whole police

force was on continuous duty for ten days and nights in the streets, and

commissariat arrangements for both European and Indian police had to be

made on the spot. Though no serious trouble occurred during the first

few days of the festival, there were several indications of trouble

brewing, and the Commissioner therefore arranged with Brigadier-General

John Swann to hold garrison troops in readiness. On the tenth night

or _Katal-ki-rat_ a serious disturbance broke out in Bhendy Bazar

about 3 a.m., in connexion with the procession of the Rangari _moholla

tabut_. Free fighting between the processionists and the mob from other

_mohollas_ took place all the way from Grant road to Pydhoni, and it was

due solely to the efforts of Mr. Vincent, the Deputy Commissioner, and a

handful of police who were escorting the procession, that the _tabut_ was

eventually brought back to its resting-place. The mob by this time had

tasted blood and displayed so truculent an attitude that the Commissioner

decided to telephone for the troops and picket them throughout the danger

zone. By 4 a.m. on January 12th the troops had taken their places, and

the mob, for the moment deeming discretion the better part of valour,

melted away in the darkness. About 5 p.m., however, in the afternoon

of the same day, the mob, which declined to carry out the _tabuts_ in

procession, collected on Parel road and Memonwada road and commenced

stoning the troops and police. They also stopped all traffic, stoned

tram-cars and private carriages, and roughly handled several harmless

pedestrians. The police made several charges upon them from Pydhoni,

but were unable permanently to disperse the rioters. At length the

Commissioner, seeing that the two mobs refused to disperse and were

practically out of hand, and that the Pathans were on the point of

breaking loose, called Rao Bahadur Chunilal H. Setalwad, one of the

Presidency Magistrates, who was on duty at Sulliman Chauki, and asked him

to give the order to the troops (the Warwickshire Regiment) picketed at

Pydhoni to fire on the mob. The order was given at once and the rioting

ceased.[116]

Like Napoleon’s famous “whiff of grapeshot”, the firing of the Warwicks

may be said to have blown the old Muharram into the limbo of oblivion.

From that date, January 1911, the processional part of the Muharram, with

its _tolis_, its blackmail, its terrorism and its obscenities, ceased

to exist and has not up to the present 1922 been revived. Before the

succeeding Muharram drew near, the Commissioner had framed new rules

for the celebration, of which the deposit by _tabut_-license holders

of ample security for good behaviour and a complete revision of the

processional route for each _tabut_ were two of the main features. He had

also contrived to persuade the leaders of the various Muhammadan sections

and _mohollas_ that the orgiastic method of celebrating the festival

was an anachronism, not countenanced by Islamic teaching and gravely

injurious to the City. In thus securing the obliteration of the customs

and practices, which for more than fifty years had been responsible for

periodical outbreaks of disorder, the Commissioner was greatly assisted

by some of the leading men of the Sunni _jamats_, of whom the most

conspicuous and most helpful was Sirdar Saheb Sulliman Cassum Haji Mitha,

C. I. E., of Kolsa _Moholla_. He led the way at succeeding Muharrams in

popularizing the _waaz_ or nightly religious discourses and in spending

upon them, and upon illuminations and charitable distribution of food to

the poorer classes, the money which was formerly wasted on irreverent

and turbulent processions. For this fundamental change in the character

of the festival none perhaps were more grateful than the _Maulvis_ and

_Mullas_ who presided over the _waaz_; for with the disappearance of

the _tolis_ and their paraphernalia their audiences were enormously

increased. But respectable Moslems and the general public also breathed a

sigh of relief, on realizing that the longstanding annual menace to law

and order had been exorcised. In December, 1914, on the conclusion of the

fourth Muharram celebrated in the new manner, the Bombay Government wrote

to Mr. Edwardes, expressing their thanks for his unremitting efforts and

skilful management of the festival. “The result”, they remarked, “is

in large measure due to the excellent relations which you established

between the Muhammadan leaders and yourself, thus rendering it possible

to relegate to the past the disreputable ceremonies which used to

disfigure the Muharram. It is now possible to regard the new regulations

as having become permanently established”.

Such, very briefly, is the history of the purification of the Bombay

Muharram. The old days, when the police were on continuous duty for

ten days and nights, when the Bohras were subjected to volleys of the

vilest and most obscene abuse and to open assault, when the lowest and

most turbulent portion of the population was permitted to take charge of

the central portion of the city, and when rioting with its complement

of drastic repression was liable to recur in any year—those days have

passed, and one hopes that a weak administration will never permit them

to recur. The present puritanical and more reverent method of celebration

was firmly established during Mr. Edwardes’ Commissionership with the

help and approval of leading Muhammadans, who realized at length that the

annual orgy in the streets was a disgrace to Islam.

It remains only to notice the effect upon the police of the outbreak of

the Great War in August, 1914. The day after War was declared, local

shopkeepers, particularly the dealers in foodstuffs, commenced to raise

their prices to famine level, and large numbers of the poorer classes

appealed to the police for assistance. Government having decided to

appoint a food-price committee, the Commissioner ordered a _battaki_

to be beaten throughout the City for three days; several shopkeepers

who were disposed to be recalcitrant were called up to the Head Police

Office and warned; and in several cases constables were posted at shops

to see that prices were not unduly raised. Excess amounts received by

shopkeepers from mill-hands and others were in many cases recovered and

paid back to the purchasers, and a series of judiciously-fabricated

reports were spread by chosen agents, describing the imaginary fate which

had overtaken certain shopkeepers, who had extorted fancy prices from the

public. Somewhat similar action was taken with excellent effect in the

case of retail-dealers, who refused to accept currency-notes of small

denominations from the poorer classes. Within a few days these measures

produced the required effect, and trade again became normal. The police

were on constant duty day and night at the Government Dockyard, at the

various military camps erected for the Indian Expeditionary Force, and

during the economic disturbance in the early days of the War at the

banks and Currency Office. They assisted the military authorities to

find Dhobis, Bhistis and other camp-followers for enrolment, they traced

absentee followers and native seamen, and during the heavy rain-storms of

October, 1914, they found accommodation in permanent buildings for the

troops under canvas. They took charge of coal-stacks for the Director, R.

I. M., and did much extra duty at the Wadi Bandar railway goods-sheds.

They displayed great tact in their management of the crowds which used

to collect in the streets to hear the special editions of the vernacular

newspapers read out during the early months of the War; and during the

aeroplane scare, they were equally successful in dealing with the mobs

which used to scan the skies for airships. While the _Emden_ was seizing

vessels in the Bay of Bengal and bombarding Madras, there was again a

scare in the City and some of the more timorous merchants, taking their

cash and jewellery with them, fled to their homes in Native States, where

in several cases the local police kindly relieved them of most of their

valuables. Others, equally timorous but more reasonable, applied to the

Police Commissioner for advice, and were satisfied with his assurance

that if it should become necessary to vacate Bombay, he would give them

ample warning beforehand. Trusting to this promise, many Hindu merchants

remained in the City, who would otherwise have fled.

The Bombay City Police: A Historical Sketch, 1672-1916 · 第 5 / 6 章