The life of this criminal lunatic has been described so often, with
so much journalistic horror, that I hesitate to offer the plain
matter-of-fact comments of a doctor upon it.
In order to understand the Russia of the last few centuries, we must
first of all glance at Russian history. Under the brutal yoke of the
Mongols the Russians learned the worst extremes of cruelty to which the
vanquished in an Oriental country must submit; for, their country laid
waste by civil war and devastated by the Tartars, the whole people were
familiar with bloodshed, misery and cruelty. A man’s children were his
slaves, whom he could sell four times, and his wife and family lay under
a sterner rule of fatherhood than ever obtained even in Rome or in Asia.
Prisoners of war had to sell themselves as slaves lest they starve.
Ivan was born in 1530, son of Vassili Ivanovitch and Helena Glinska. One
of his brothers was an imbecile, and his father was sullen, changeable,
and savagely ferocious.
When Ivan was three years of age his father died, and, under the regency
of his mother his education in vice began; indeed, it seems to have been
prodigious. Although Helena seems to have done her best to protect him,
he was encouraged by courtiers to yield to every form of self-indulgent
vice that is possible to a young man. He used to watch with delight his
dogs as they fell upon prisoners whom he had had thrown to them; and was
constantly suspicious of the Boyars, or aristocrats, whom he suspected
to have organised conspiracies against him. It is said that they used to
organise their conspiracies either in the name of Ivan or of his mother;
and they were opposed by their natural enemies, the trading classes.
Hence it was that Ivan conceived a violent hatred and terror of the
Boyars, and an equally foolish trust in the merchants. He had to suffer
many indignities, and saw his favourites murdered before his eyes. Ivan
struck back, until at last he captured one Shousky, last of the Boyars,
and gleefully threw him to the dogs from the balcony whence he had often
seen his prisoners eaten. A great fire broke out in Moscow in 1547,
when Ivan was seventeen years old; seventeen hundred people perished in
the flames. The populace rose in fury, accusing his grandmother and her
sons of setting Moscow ablaze. Being a good grandson Ivan acted with
vigour; he did not try to ascertain how far the old lady and his uncles
were guilty, but incontinently seized upon the ringleaders of the people
and put them to death as they deserved. In the midst of the pother a
monk—one Sylvester—appeared. He seems to have been like one of those
Oriental prophets who are said to have dared to tell the truth to kings.
Bravely facing Ivan, he foretold the future in many visions and dreams;
and warned Ivan that it was owing to his own misdeeds that Russia was
suffering such tragic torments.
For some reason Ivan spared him, called together a synod of priests and
other intelligentsia of Russia and asked for its aid in the government.
Flattered, the synod drew up rules for its ruler; and the next ten years
are pictured to us—possibly by friends of the synod—as a veritable
_quinquennium Neronis_; though the period was longer than Nero’s. There
was good government and outward prosperity; the army was reformed; a new
code of laws was devised; a printing press was established; Archangel
was founded; trade with England was set afoot through the White Sea;
by victories in Livonia the frontier was pushed towards the Baltic;
fortresses against the Tartars were established in the Crimea; and the
Turks were driven back. In these wars Ivan IV showed himself to be a
great and able general; a worthy predecessor of that Peter the Great who
was soon to come after him.
But this was too good to last. In 1552 his wife died: Anastasia, first
of the Romanoffs, the woman, as it would now seem, who saved Russia by
protecting the Tsar from harpies. Ivan was heart-broken. He suspected her
to have been poisoned, as every sudden death in the sixteenth century was
attributed to poison; and from a little village near Moscow he wrote a
violent letter, accusing the Boyars both of poisoning his Anastasia and
of misgoverning Russia during his minority. He concluded by threatening
that God called him to abandon the ungrateful people, who were unworthy
of such love as his.
This threw Russia into a panic. “How shall we get on without our ruler?”
they asked. “Who will defend us against our enemies? What will the sheep
do without their shepherd?”
Evidently Ivan was a politician of no mean order; he knew his Russia.
Touched by the weeping of the herd, he returned to his subjects. But how
changed an Ivan! Formerly he had been a splendid man physically, tall,
broad-shouldered, with hawk nose and eagle eyes; a true tsar of the
dynasty of Rurik; fit leader of the great Russian people. On his return
to his loving people he was suddenly become thin and wasted; his hair was
falling; his skin was dull; his eyes had lost their brilliance; physical
degeneration had already set in.
Considering his subsequent history, it is probable that in the fit of
petulance after the death of his beloved wife he had become infected
with syphilis, which was then at the height of its conquering career
throughout Europe. Eight days after her death he married a Circassian
woman, who was of a rough mind, and of coarse breed; possibly it may
have been from her that he caught his disease, for to her influence is
generally attributed his mental degeneration.
Such a fate often happens to a physically strong young man who suddenly
finds himself deprived of his helpmate; and it was a wise law of the
Romans, that every Governor of a province must be married; if for no
other reason than that a wife would protect him from the attacks of other
women who might mean him less well than she.
When he was seventeen, he had proclaimed himself “Tsar,” thus showing
himself bolder than his predecessors, who had perforce to content
themselves with the title of “Grand-Duke.”
Now, in his new-found glory, with his new wife by his side, he raised for
himself a bodyguard of 6,000 men, whom he called the Opritschnitza. These
men rode through the countryside with besoms and dogs’ skulls at their
saddle-bows. The emblems were supposed to signify that they would sweep
away and hunt down all enemies of the Tsar.
But the Boyars were still to be properly punished for their wickedness;
there were a few left, and at least the children of the infamous brood
survived and had to be brought to justice; so Ivan rode through the land
from country-house to country-house at the head of his men, besoms, dogs’
skulls, and all, slaying and burning; a right merry journey. Those whom
he could not kill perished in the snow, and all Russia lay in terror of
Æsop’s “King Stork.” Better had it been for Russia if the people had
left him in his self-imposed quarantine, to recover in peace from his
skin-syphilis before it had attacked his brain. For a man suddenly driven
mad by securing absolute power, and worried by fighting, revenge, and
murder, to rage desperately about the country instead of treating his
syphilis even by the crude methods that were in vogue in the middle
of the sixteenth century, was sheer madness. To this day we find that
physical and mental rest, fresh air, and mercury, are the standbys in the
treatment of syphilis, and quite probably it is less deadly to-day than
it was in 1550.
It was the custom in Russia for the Tsar, when he wanted a wife, to
collect all the most beautiful women from whom he should make his choice;
and in 1570 he, in need of another wife, collected no less than 2,000
girls; them he kept in captivity for more than a year, treating them as
he would, ruthlessly and relentlessly, a symptom truly characteristic of
cerebral syphilis in a man untroubled by restraints, moral or legal. From
these he chose another wife for himself and one for his son, that the
great name of Ivan should not perish from the earth.
The shuddering remainder he bestowed on his courtiers, or sent home.
Cerebral syphilis is an extraordinary thing. Besides causing general
paralysis, which is known positively to be syphilitic, the disease acts
upon the arteries of the brain, and the symptoms that it causes seem to
depend upon the areas of the brain that the diseased arteries supply. If
the affected area is the front of the brain in which the intellectual
faculties are supposed to be, all the symptoms of violent mental
irritation are caused. They may begin quite early in the disease, and
may last for many years till the patient’s death; much appears to depend
upon whether the patient has been able to live a decent and quiet life.
That in the case of Henry VIII his disease apparently led to nothing more
monstrous than cutting off two of his wives’ heads—possibly they deserved
it—and to violent and murderous political activity, would rather seem
to show that if he had had a chance of rest and treatment he might have
been no worse a king than many others who have won fame and gratitude.
At least he was a highly educated man who certainly meant well at first.
Ivan from the beginning was little better than a brute, of shocking
family history and evil impulses. In him it probably went far beyond the
stage of mere syphilitic psychasthenia.[10]
Seven wives in all were his, so that he beat Henry’s record by one. I
suppose he showed the same miserable story of domestic unhappiness,
but I have not been sufficiently interested to find out. Some of his
letters are still extant, and they show all the signs of insanity, in
their unwieldy length, their foolish cunning, their voluble avoidance
of the main point, and their inconsequence. On the evidence of these
letters alone any two doctors to-day would “sign up” Ivan IV. To say
that he became wildly sexual would be to understate the matter: he
developed the morals of a satyr. This is all very characteristic of
syphilitic insanity, whose victims often find its worst effects in an
utter abandonment of sexual restraint. It is almost as if the disease,
being often the result of impurity, revenges itself on the victim by
accentuating the very incontinence which has caused it.
The rest of the story of Ivan the Terrible—it is strange that history has
not yet called him Ivan the Great—is not very interesting, except for two
shocking incidents that we shall relate in their turn. It is simply the
record of a man with an Oriental mind, maddened by syphilis, abandoning
himself to the most ruthless cruelty, experimenting as if to plumb the
depths of human wickedness. It would be wearisome both to tell it and to
read it, with all the senseless stabbings, the stamping on the feet of
helpless menials, the red-hot pokers, the experiments in torture, the
burnings, the infamy. Let us hold our noses and turn to historical facts
of a broader interest.
A man, in order to curry favour with the Tsar, wrote a private letter
to the King of Poland accusing the great city of Novgorod of conspiring
against its ruler. Ivan found it by a trick, possibly with the connivance
of the writer. He held his peace, just as Henry VIII had remained silent
when he first heard of the sin of Anne Boleyn. But, without a word to
anybody, he collected an army of 15,000 men, whom he marched towards the
doomed city, around which he erected a barricade of stakes that no one
might enter or leave so as to escape the just punishment of an outraged
Tsar. Then, for every day throughout a period of five weeks 500 to 1,000
of the citizens were led into his presence and put to death in all sorts
of amusing ways; Ivan’s cleverness in devising new ways of killing seems
to have been really wonderful. So wicked was the city that neither man,
woman, nor child was spared, until but a scanty few remained alive. This
niggardly remainder he collected before him, and forced to pray for
the beloved Tsar. Like many syphilitic lunatics he had long considered
himself to be God.
Then his eldest son, Ivan, who had grown up very like himself in
character, so that people were already looking into the future with
forebodings, took offence at what the half-witted fellow thought to be
his father’s insult to his wife, Helena. With a roar Ivan rushed upon
his son, striking him on the head with a heavy staff shod with iron. Ivan
the prince dropped insensible, and died in a few days. Tsar Ivan was
shocked unutterably, did penance and for a time seemed to regain sanity
in his grief for the loss of his bright boy. But only for a time; soon
the old monotonous régime of insensate cruelty returned.
1584 was a great year for Ivan. Feeling rather unwell the brilliant idea
struck him that a well-born English girl would just suit his whim; so
he sent a special messenger to Queen Elizabeth to select him one, also
to inform her that, should his mutinous subjects prove unruly he would
honour England by seeking therein a sanctuary. Thrice happy England;
sanctuary for so many politicians! Well might refugees from the Austrian
troubles in 1848 seek her green fields for peace.
The Virgin Queen selected one of her maids of honour, Lady Mary Hastings,
for this dishonour. The Earl of Huntingdon, Lady Mary’s father, and Lady
Mary herself, shuddered and protested at the thought of her marriage with
this dreadful man, especially as Ivan’s seventh wife was still alive, and
he had blithely proposed to set her aside in favour of the fair English
maid, as the wretched creature would not die, nor leave him single,
nor allow him to poison her. But for once, at least, Elizabeth’s heart
conquered her head, and she did not press the match; it was too tragic
even for the sixteenth century, so that no English girl graced Moscow any
more than did Caliban marry Miranda.
But Death was still waiting, inexorably. No doubt Ivan had long forgotten
the apparently trifling illness from which he had suffered after the
death of his first wife, or rather soon after his second marriage, but it
had not forgotten him. Nature never forgets and seldom forgives, as so
many doctors have said about Life.
A frightful portent, a comet, appeared in the sky, and as Ivan saw its
horrid tail the thought struck him that it had come to warn him of his
death. All Russia was at once in a ferment. Soothsayers were summoned
from all the ends of the Tsardom. No less than sixty were collected
to save the life of the Tsar, that religious lunatic, who had thought
himself to be God; but the best they could do was to promise him that
he would not die until twelve days had elapsed. “It will be the worse
for you if your promise holds good,” said Ivan in a fury; and with that
he made up his mind to slay the soothsayers if he should survive the
twelve days. The wife of his surviving son, who was to succeed him as
the half-imbecile Tsar Feodor—syphilis again!—came to comfort him in his
terrors, that this mighty Tsar should not have to go down into the dark
his hand unpressed by any woman’s; but Ivan indecently assaulted her and
she fled in terror. To the later Ivan every woman was less feminine than
female.
The twelfth day dawned and Ivan prepared the scaffold for the execution
of the soothsayers. He himself took what precautions occurred to his
simple soul, and spent most of the day on a sofa playing draughts with
one of his male favourites—surely the most harmless and safest of joys;
surely Ivan could have done nothing better unless he had forestalled
fate by a good course of mercury thirty years before! At last, just as
Ivan was beginning to congratulate himself that he had beaten fate,
beaten the comet and beaten the astrologers, and was glutting himself
with the anticipation of his next merry jest, he suddenly choked,
uttered a stifled cry and fell back dead. Fate and syphilis had won; the
astrologers had predicted so accurately that their heads were even then
trembling on their shoulders. What had happened? No doubt his syphilis
had affected the aortic valve of his heart, as it frequently does to-day.
The blood, instead of coursing on its orderly way throughout his body,
had run back into his heart, which, being overfull of blood, had stopped;
and in a moment Ivan the Terrible was dead. The people wept for him, as
being the Tsar. “Such was the Tsar,” sobbed an admirer. “Such as he was,
God made him.”
I do not ask you to suppose that I have diagnosed Ivan from any special
knowledge of my own; the facts I have enumerated are all to be found in
a book called _The Blot upon the Brain_, by the late Dr. W. W. Ireland,
a once-celebrated alienist of Edinburgh, who, so far as I know, was the
first to suggest that Ivan IV probably suffered from syphilis. I go
further, and suggest that he probably suffered from diffuse cerebral
syphilis and syphilis of the aortic valve, just as people do to this day.
Twenty years ago I read that syphilis was unusually widespread in Russia,
and I have often wondered since 1917 whether that long ago epidemic can
possibly have had anything to do with recent Russian politics.