LETTER XLVIII.

The accounts of the state of St. George’s Fund, given without any

inconvenience in crowding type, on the last leaf of this number of

Fors, will, I hope, be as satisfactory to my subscribers as they are to

me. In these days of financial operation, the subscribers to anything

may surely be content when they find that all their talents have been

laid up in the softest of napkins; and even farther, that, though they

are getting no interest themselves, that lichenous growth of vegetable

gold, or mould, is duly developing itself on their capital.

The amount of subscriptions received, during the four years of my

mendicancy, might have disappointed me, if, in my own mind, I had made

any appointments on the subject, or had benevolence pungent enough to

make me fret at the delay in the commencement of the national felicity

which I propose to bestow. On the contrary, I am only too happy to

continue amusing myself in my study, with stones and pictures; and

find, as I grow old, that I remain resigned to the consciousness of any

quantity of surrounding vice, distress, and disease, provided only the

sun shine in at my window over Corpus Garden, and there are no whistles

from the luggage trains passing the Waterworks.

I understand this state of even temper to be what most people call

‘rational;’ and, indeed, it has been the result of very steady effort

on my own part to keep myself, if it might be, out of Hanwell, or that

other Hospital which makes the name of Christ’s native village dreadful

in the ear of London. For, having long observed that the most perilous

beginning of trustworthy qualification for either of those

establishments consisted in an exaggerated sense of self-importance;

and being daily compelled, of late, to value my own person and opinions

at a higher and higher rate, in proportion to my extending experience

of the rarity of any similar creatures or ideas among mankind, it

seemed to me expedient to correct this increasing conviction of my

superior wisdom, by companionship with pictures I could not copy, and

stones I could not understand:—while, that this wholesome seclusion may

remain only self-imposed, I think it not a little fortunate for me that

the few relations I have left are generally rather fond of me;—don’t

know clearly which is the next of kin,—and perceive that the

administration of my inconsiderable effects [65] would be rather

troublesome than profitable to them. Not in the least, therefore,

wondering at the shyness of my readers to trust me with money of

theirs, I have made, during these four years past, some few experiments

with money of my own,—in hopes of being able to give such account of

them as might justify a more extended confidence. I am bound to state

that the results, for the present, are not altogether encouraging. On

my own little piece of mountain ground at Coniston, I grow a large

quantity of wood-hyacinths and heather, without any expense worth

mentioning; but my only industrious agricultural operations have been

the getting three pounds ten worth of hay, off a field for which I pay

six pounds rent; and the surrounding, with a costly wall six feet high,

to keep out rabbits, a kitchen garden, which, being terraced and trim,

my neighbours say is pretty; and which will probably, every third year,

when the weather is not wet, supply me with a dish of strawberries.

At Carshalton, in Surrey, I have indeed had the satisfaction of

cleaning out one of the springs of the Wandel, and making it pleasantly

habitable by trout; but find that the fountain, instead of taking care

of itself when once pure, as I expected it to do, requires continual

looking after, like a child getting into a mess; and involves me

besides in continual debate with the surveyors of the parish, who

insist on letting all the roadwashings run into it. For the present,

however, I persevere, at Carshalton, against the wilfulness of the

spring and the carelessness of the parish; and hope to conquer both:

but I have been obliged entirely to abandon a notion I had of

exhibiting ideally clean street pavement in the centre of London,—in

the pleasant environs of Church Lane, St. Giles’s. There I had every

help and encouragement from the authorities; and hoped, with the staff

of two men and a young rogue of a crossing-sweeper, added to the

regular force of the parish, to keep a quarter of a mile square of the

narrow streets without leaving so much as a bit of orange-peel on the

footway, or an eggshell in the gutters. I failed, partly because I

chose too difficult a district to begin with, (the contributions of

transitional mud being constant, and the inhabitants passive,) but

chiefly because I could no more be on the spot myself, to give spirit

to the men, when I left Denmark Hill for Coniston.

I next set up a tea-shop at 29, Paddington Street, W., (an

establishment which my Fors readers may as well know of,) to supply the

poor in that neighbourhood with pure tea, in packets as small as they

chose to buy, without making a profit on the subdivision,—larger orders

being of course equally acceptable from anybody who cares to promote

honest dealing. The result of this experiment has been my ascertaining

that the poor only like to buy their tea where it is brilliantly

lighted and eloquently ticketed; and as I resolutely refuse to compete

with my neighbouring tradesmen either in gas or rhetoric, the patient

subdivision of my parcels by the two old servants of my mother’s, who

manage the business for me, hitherto passes little recognized as an

advantage by my uncalculating public. Also, steady increase in the

consumption of spirits throughout the neighbourhood faster and faster

slackens the demand for tea; but I believe none of these circumstances

have checked my trade so much as my own procrastination in painting my

sign. Owing to that total want of imagination and invention which makes

me so impartial and so accurate a writer on subjects of political

economy, I could not for months determine whether the said sign should

be of a Chinese character, black upon gold; or of a Japanese, blue upon

white; or of pleasant English, rose-colour on green; and still less how

far legible scale of letters could be compatible, on a board only a

foot broad, with lengthy enough elucidation of the peculiar offices of

‘Mr. Ruskin’s tea-shop.’ Meanwhile the business languishes, and the

rent and taxes absorb the profits, and something more, after the salary

of my good servants has been paid.

In all these cases, however, I can see that I am defeated only because

I have too many things on hand: and that neither rabbits at Coniston,

road-surveyors at Croydon, or mud in St. Giles’s would get the better

of me, if I could give exclusive attention to any one business:

meantime, I learn the difficulties which are to be met, and shall make

the fewer mistakes when I venture on any work with other people’s

money.

I may as well, together with these confessions, print a piece written

for the end of a Fors letter at Assisi, a month or two back, but for

which I had then no room, referring to the increase of commercial,

religious, and egotistic insanity, [66] in modern society, and delicacy

of the distinction implied by that long wall at Hanwell, between the

persons inside it, and out.

‘Does it never occur to me,’ (thus the letter went on) ‘that I may be

mad myself?’

Well, I am so alone now in my thoughts and ways, that if I am not mad,

I should soon become so, from mere solitude, but for my work. But it

must be manual work. Whenever I succeed in a drawing, I am happy, in

spite of all that surrounds me of sorrow. It is a strange feeling;—not

gratified vanity: I can have any quantity of praise I like from some

sorts of people; but that does me no vital good, (though dispraise does

me mortal harm); whereas to succeed to my own satisfaction in a manual

piece of work, is life,—to me, as to all men; and it is only the peace

which comes necessarily from manual labour which in all time has kept

the honest country people patient in their task of maintaining the

rascals who live in towns. But we are in hard times, now, for all men’s

wits; for men who know the truth are like to go mad from isolation; and

the fools are all going mad in ‘Schwärmerei,’—only that is much the

pleasanter way. Mr. Lecky, for instance, quoted in last Fors; how

pleasant for him to think he is ever so much wiser than Aristotle; and

that, as a body, the men of his generation are the wisest that ever

were born—giants of intellect, according to Lord Macaulay, compared to

the pigmies of Bacon’s time, and the minor pigmies of Christ’s time,

and the minutest of all, the microscopic pigmies of Solomon’s time,

and, finally, the vermicular and infusorial pigmies—twenty-three

millions to the cube inch—of Mr. Darwin’s time, whatever that may be.

How pleasant for Mr. Lecky to live in these days of the Anakim,—“his

spear, to equal which, the tallest pine,” etc., etc., which no man

Stratford-born could have lifted, much less shaken.

But for us of the old race—few of us now left,—children who reverence

our fathers, and are ashamed of ourselves; comfortless enough in that

shame, and yearning for one word or glance from the graves of old, yet

knowing ourselves to be of the same blood, and recognizing in our

hearts the same passions, with the ancient masters of humanity;—we, who

feel as men, and not as carnivorous worms; we, who are every day

recognizing some inaccessible height of thought and power, and are

miserable in our shortcomings,—the few of us now standing here and

there, alone, in the midst of this yelping, carnivorous crowd, mad for

money and lust, tearing each other to pieces, and starving each other

to death, and leaving heaps of their dung and ponds of their spittle on

every palace floor and altar stone,—it is impossible for us, except in

the labour of our hands, not to go mad.

And the danger is tenfold greater for a man in my own position,

concerned with the arts which develope the more subtle brain

sensations; and, through them, tormented all day long. Mr. Leslie

Stephen rightly says how much better it is to have a thick skin and a

good digestion. Yes, assuredly; but what is the use of knowing that, if

one hasn’t? In one of my saddest moods, only a week or two ago, because

I had failed twice over in drawing the lifted hand of Giotto’s

‘Poverty;’ utterly beaten and comfortless, at Assisi, I got some

wholesome peace and refreshment by mere sympathy with a Bewickian

little pig in the roundest and conceitedest burst of pig-blossom. His

servant,—a grave old woman, with much sorrow and toil in the wrinkles

of her skin, while his was only dimpled in its divine thickness,—was

leading him, with magnanimous length of rope, down a grassy path behind

the convent; stopping, of course, where he chose. Stray stalks and

leaves of eatable things, in various stages of ambrosial rottenness,

lay here and there; the convent walls made more savoury by their

fumigation, as Mr. Leslie Stephen says the Alpine pines are by his

cigar. And the little joyful darling of Demeter shook his curly tail,

and munched; and grunted the goodnaturedest of grunts, and snuffled the

approvingest of snuffles, and was a balm and beatification to behold;

and I would fain have changed places with him for a little while, or

with Mr. Leslie Stephen for a little while,—at luncheon,

suppose,—anywhere but among the Alps. But it can’t be.

Hotel Meurice, Paris,

20th October, 1874.

I interrupt myself, for an instant or two, to take notice of two little

things that happen to me here—arriving to breakfast by night train from

Geneva.

Expecting to be cold, I had ordered fire, and sat down by it to read my

letters as soon as I arrived, not noticing that the little parlour was

getting much too hot. Presently, in comes the chambermaid, to put the

bedroom in order, which one enters through the parlour. Perceiving that

I am mismanaging myself, in the way of fresh air, as she passes

through, “Il fait bien chaud, monsieur, ici,” says she reprovingly, and

with entire self-possession. Now that is French servant-character of

the right old school. She knows her own position perfectly, and means

to stay in it, and wear her little white radiant frill of a cap all her

days. She knows my position also; and has not the least fear of my

thinking her impertinent because she tells me what it is right that I

should know. Presently afterwards, an evidently German-importation of

waiter brings me up my breakfast, which has been longer in appearing

than it would have been in old times. It looks all right at first,—the

napkin, china, and solid silver sugar basin, all of the old régime.

Bread, butter,—yes, of the best still. Coffee, milk,—all right too.

But, at last, here is a bit of the new régime. There are no

sugar-tongs; and the sugar is of beetroot, and in methodically similar

cakes, which I must break with my finger and thumb if I want a small

piece, and put back what I don’t want for my neighbour, to-morrow.

‘Civilization,’ this, you observe, according to Professor Liebig and

Mr. John Stuart Mill. Not according to old French manners, however.

Now, my readers are continually complaining that I don’t go on telling

them my plan of life, under the rule of St. George’s Company.

I have told it them, again and again, in broad terms: agricultural

life, with as much refinement as I can enforce in it. But it is

impossible to describe what I mean by ‘refinement,’ except in details

which can only be suggested by practical need; and which cannot at all

be set down at once.

Here, however, to-day, is one instance. At the best hotel in what has

been supposed the most luxurious city of modern Europe,—because people

are now always in a hurry to catch the train, they haven’t time to use

the sugar-tongs, or look for a little piece among differently sized

lumps, and therefore they use their fingers; have bad sugar instead of

good, and waste the ground that would grow blessed cherry trees,

currant bushes, or wheat, in growing a miserable root as a substitute

for the sugar-cane, which God has appointed to grow where cherries and

wheat won’t, and to give juice which will freeze into sweet snow as

pure as hoar-frost.

Now, on the poorest farm of the St. George’s Company, the servants

shall have white and brown sugar of the best—or none. If we are too

poor to buy sugar, we will drink our tea without; and have

suet-dumpling instead of pudding. But among the earliest school

lessons, and home lessons, decent behaviour at table will be primarily

essential; and of such decency, one little exact point will be—the

neat, patient, and scrupulous use of sugar-tongs instead of fingers. If

we are too poor to have silver basins, we will have delf ones; if not

silver tongs, we will have wooden ones; and the boys of the house shall

be challenged to cut, and fit together, the prettiest and handiest

machines of the sort they can contrive. In six months you would find

more real art fancy brought out in the wooden handles and claws, than

there is now in all the plate in London.

Now, there’s the cuckoo-clock striking seven, just as I sit down to

correct the press of this sheet, in my nursery at Herne Hill; and

though I don’t remember, as the murderer does in Mr. Crummles’ play,

having heard a cuckoo-clock strike seven—in my infancy, I do remember,

in my favourite ‘Frank,’ much talk of the housekeeper’s cuckoo-clock,

and of the boy’s ingenuity in mending it. Yet to this hour of seven in

the morning, ninth December of my fifty-fifth year, I haven’t the least

notion how any such clock says ‘Cuckoo,’ nor a clear one even of the

making of the commonest barking toy of a child’s Noah’s ark. I don’t

know how a barrel organ produces music by being ground; nor what real

function the pea has in a whistle. Physical science—all this—of a kind

which would have been boundlessly interesting to me, as to all boys of

mellifluous disposition, if only I had been taught it with due

immediate practice, and enforcement of true manufacture, or, in

pleasant Saxon, ‘handiwork.’ But there shall not be on St. George’s

estate a single thing in the house which the boys don’t know how to

make, nor a single dish on the table which the girls will not know how

to cook.

By the way, I have been greatly surprised by receiving some letters of

puzzled inquiry as to the meaning of my recipe, given last year, for

Yorkshire Pie. Do not my readers yet at all understand that the whole

gist of this book is to make people build their own houses, provide and

cook their own dinners, and enjoy both? Something else besides,

perhaps; but at least, and at first, those. St. Michael’s mass, and

Christ’s mass, may eventually be associated in your minds with other

things than goose and pudding; but Fors demands at first no more

chivalry nor Christianity from you than that you build your houses

bravely, and earn your dinners honestly, and enjoy them both, and be

content with them both. The contentment is the main matter; you may

enjoy to any extent, but if you are discontented, your life will be

poisoned. The little pig was so comforting to me because he was wholly

content to be a little pig; and Mr. Leslie Stephen is in a certain

degree exemplary and comforting to me, because he is wholly content to

be Mr. Leslie Stephen; while I am miserable because I am always wanting

to be something else than I am. I want to be Turner; I want to be

Gainsborough; I want to be Samuel Prout; I want to be Doge of Venice; I

want to be Pope; I want to be Lord of the Sun and Moon. The other day,

when I read that story in the papers about the dog-fight, [67] I wanted

to be able to fight a bulldog.

Truly, that was the only effect of the story upon me, though I heard

everybody else screaming out how horrible it was. What’s horrible in

it? Of course it is in bad taste, and the sign of a declining era of

national honour—as all brutal gladiatorial exhibitions are; and the

stakes and rings of the tethered combat meant precisely, for England,

what the stakes and rings of the Theatre of Taormina,—where I saw the

holes left for them among the turf, blue with Sicilian lilies, in this

last April,—meant, for Greece, and Rome. There might be something

loathsome, or something ominous, in such a story, to the old Greeks of

the school of Heracles; who used to fight with the Nemean lion, or with

Cerberus, when it was needful only, and not for money; and whom their

Argus remembered through all Trojan exile. There might be something

loathsome in it, or ominous, to an Englishman of the school of

Shakespeare or Scott; who would fight with men only, and loved his

hound. But for you—you carnivorous cheats—what, in dog’s or devil’s

name, is there horrible in it for you? Do you suppose it isn’t more

manly and virtuous to fight a bulldog, than to poison a child, or cheat

a fellow who trusts you, or leave a girl to go wild in the streets? And

don’t you live, and profess to live—and even insolently proclaim that

there’s no other way of living than—by poisoning and cheating? And

isn’t every woman of fashion’s dress, in Europe, now set the pattern of

to her by its prostitutes?

What’s horrible in it? I ask you, the third time. I hate, myself,

seeing a bulldog ill-treated; for they are the gentlest and

faithfullest of living creatures if you use them well. And the best dog

I ever had was a bull-terrier, whose whole object in life was to please

me, and nothing else; though, if he found he could please me by holding

on with his teeth to an inch-thick stick, and being swung round in the

air as fast as I could turn, that was his own idea of entirely

felicitous existence. I don’t like, therefore, hearing of a bulldog’s

being ill-treated; but I can tell you a little thing that chanced to me

at Coniston the other day, more horrible, in the deep elements of it,

than all the dog, bulldog, or bull fights, or baitings, of England,

Spain, and California. A fine boy, the son of an amiable English

clergyman, had come on the coach-box round the Water-head to see me,

and was telling me of the delightful drive he had had. “Oh,” he said,

in the triumph of his enthusiasm, “and just at the corner of the wood,

there was such a big squirrel! and the coachman threw a stone at it,

and nearly hit it!”

‘Thoughtlessness—only thoughtlessness’—say you—proud father? Well,

perhaps not much worse than that. But how could it be much worse?

Thoughtlessness is precisely the chief public calamity of our day; and

when it comes to the pitch, in a clergyman’s child, of not thinking

that a stone hurts what it hits of living things, and not caring for

the daintiest, dextrousest, innocentest living thing in the northern

forests of God’s earth, except as a brown excrescence to be knocked off

their branches,—nay, good pastor of Christ’s lambs, believe me, your

boy had better have been employed in thoughtfully and resolutely

stoning St. Stephen—if any St. Stephen is to be found in these days,

when men not only can’t see heaven opened, but don’t so much as care to

see it, shut.

For they, at least, meant neither to give pain nor death without

cause,—that unanimous company who stopped their ears,—they, and the

consenting bystander who afterwards was sorry for his mistake.

But, on the whole, the time has now come when we must cease throwing of

stones either at saints or squirrels; and, as I say, build our own

houses with them, honestly set: and similarly content ourselves in

peaceable use of iron and lead, and other such things which we have

been in the habit of throwing at each other dangerously, in

thoughtlessness; and defending ourselves against as thoughtlessly,

though in what we suppose to be an ingenious manner. Ingenious or not,

will the fabric of our new ship of the Line, ‘Devastation,’ think you,

follow its fabricator in heavenly places, when he dies in the Lord? In

such representations as I have chanced to see of probable Paradise,

Noah is never without his ark;—holding that up for judgment as the main

work of his life. Shall we hope at the Advent to see the builder of the

‘Devastation’ invite St. Michael’s judgment on his better style of

naval architecture, and four-foot-six-thick ‘armour of light’?

It is to-day the second Sunday in Advent, and all over England, about

the time that I write these words, full congregations will be for the

second time saying Amen to the opening collect of the Christian year.

I wonder how many individuals of the enlightened public understand a

single word of its first clause:

“Almighty God, give us grace that we may cast away the works of

darkness, and put upon us the armour of light, now in the time of

this mortal life.”

How many of them, may it be supposed, have any clear knowledge of what

grace is, or of what the works of darkness are which they hope to have

grace to cast away; or will feel themselves, in the coming year, armed

with any more luminous mail than their customary coats and gowns, hosen

and hats? Or again, when they are told to “have no fellowship with the

unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them,”—what fellowship

do they recognize themselves to have guiltily formed; and whom, or

what, will they feel now called upon to reprove?

In last Fors, I showed you how the works of darkness were

unfruitful;—the precise reverse of the fruitful, or creative, works of

Light;—but why in this collect, which you pray over and over again all

Advent, do you ask for ‘armour’ instead of industry? You take your coat

off to work in your own gardens; why must you put a coat of mail on,

when you are to work in the Garden of God?

Well; because the earthworms in it are big—and have teeth and claws,

and venomous tongues. So that the first question for you is indeed, not

whether you have a mind to work in it—many a coward has that—but

whether you have courage to stand in it, and armour proved enough to

stand in.

Suppose you let the consenting bystander who took care of the coats

taken off to do that piece of work on St. Stephen, explain to you the

pieces out of St. Michael’s armoury needful to the husbandman, or

Georgos, of God’s garden.

“Stand therefore; having your loins girt about with Truth.”

That means, that the strength of your backbone depends on your meaning

to do true battle.

“And having on the breastplate of Justice.”

That means, there are to be no partialities in your heart, of anger or

pity;—but you must only in justice kill, and only in justice keep

alive.

“And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of Peace.”

That means, that where your foot pauses, moves, or enters, there shall

be peace; and where you can only shake the dust of it on the threshold,

mourning.

“Above all, take the shield of Faith.”

Of fidelity or obedience to your captain, showing his bearings, argent,

a cross gules; your safety, and all the army’s, being first in the

obedience of faith: and all casting of spears vain against such guarded

phalanx.

“And take the helmet of Salvation.”

Elsewhere, the hope of salvation, that being the defence of your

intellect against base and sad thoughts, as the shield of fidelity is

the defence of your heart against burning and consuming passions.

“And the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God.”

That being your weapon of war,—your power of action, whether with sword

or ploughshare; according to the saying of St. John of the young

soldiers of Christ, “I have written unto you, young men, because ye are

strong, and the Word of God abideth in you.” The Word by which the

heavens were of old; and which, being once only Breath, became in man

Flesh, ‘quickening it by the spirit’ into the life which is, and is to

come; and enabling it for all the works nobly done by the quick, and

following the dead.

And now, finish your Advent collect, and eat your Christmas fare, and

drink your Christmas wine, thankfully; and with understanding that if

the supper is holy which shows your Lord’s death till He come, the

dinner is also holy which shows His life; and if you would think it

wrong at any time to go to your own baby’s cradle side, drunk, do not

show your gladness by Christ’s cradle in that manner; but eat your

meat, and carol your carol in pure gladness and singleness of heart;

and so gird up your loins with truth, that, in the year to come, you

may do such work as Christ can praise, whether He call you to judgment

from the quick or dead; so that among your Christmas carols there may

never any more be wanting the joyfullest,—

O sing unto the Lord a new song:

Sing unto the Lord, all the earth.

Say among the heathen that the Lord is King:

The world also shall be stablished that it shall not be moved.

Let the heavens rejoice,

And let the earth be glad;

Let the sea shout, and the fulness thereof.

Let the field be joyful, and all that is therein:

Then shall all the trees of the wood rejoice

Before the Lord:

For He cometh, for He cometh to judge the earth:

He shall judge the world with righteousness,

And the people with His truth.

Fors Clavigera (Volume 4 of 8) Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain · 第 41 / 48 题