CHAPTER IV.

ROMAN GERMANY AND THE FREE GERMANS.

[Sidenote: Limitation of Roman Germany.]

The two Roman provinces of Upper and Lower Germany were the result of

that defeat of the Roman arms and of Roman policy under the reign of

Augustus which has been already (p. 55 f.) described. The original

province of Germany, which embraced the country from the Rhine to the

Elbe, subsisted only twenty years, from the first campaign of Drusus,

742 U.C. {12.}, down to the battle of Varus and the fall of Aliso, 762

U.C. {A.D. 9.}; but as, on the one hand, it included the military camps

on the left bank of the Rhine--Vindonissa, Mogontiacum, Vetera--and,

on the other hand, even after that disaster, more or less considerable

portions of the right bank remained Roman, the governorship and the

command were not, in a strict sense, done away by that catastrophe,

although they were, so to speak, placed in suspense. The internal

organisation of the Three Gauls has been already set forth; they

embraced the whole country as far as the Rhine without distinction

of descent--except that the Ubii, who had only been brought over to

settle in Gaul during the last crises, did not belong to the sixty-four

cantons, while the Helvetii, the Triboci, and generally the districts

elsewhere held in occupation by the Rhenish troops, doubtless did so

belong. The intention had been to gather together the German cantons

between the Rhine and Elbe into a similar association under Roman

supremacy, as had been constituted in the case of the Gallic cantons,

and to bestow upon it, in the altar to Augustus of the Ubian town--the

germ of the modern Cologne--an executive centre similar to that which

the altar of Augustus at Lyons formed for Gaul; for the more remote

future the transference of the chief camp to the right bank of the

Rhine, and the restoration of the left, at least in the main, to the

governor of the Belgica, were doubtless in contemplation. But these

projects came to an end with the legions of Varus; the Germanic altar

of Augustus on the Rhine became or remained the altar of the Ubii; the

legions permanently retained their standing quarters in the territory,

which properly belonged to the Belgica, but--seeing that a separation

of the military and civil administration was, according to the Roman

arrangement, excluded--was placed, so long as the troops were stationed

there, for administrative purposes also under the commandants of the

two armies.[62] For, as was formerly stated, Varus was probably the

last commandant of the united army of the Rhine; on the increase of the

army to eight legions, which was consequent upon that disaster, the

division of it to all appearance also ensued. What we have to describe

in this section therefore is not, strictly speaking, the circumstances

of a Roman province, but the fortunes of a Roman army, and, as most

closely connected therewith, the fortunes of the neighbouring peoples

and adversaries, so far as these are interwoven with the history of

Rome.

[Sidenote: Upper and Lower Germany.]

The two headquarters of the army of the Rhine were always Vetera near

Wesel and Mogontiacum, the modern Mentz, both doubtless older than

the division of the command, and one of the reasons for introducing

that division. The two armies numbered in the first century four

legions each, thus about 30,000 men[63]; at or between those two

points lay the main bulk of the Roman troops, besides one legion at

Noviomagus (Nimeguen), another at Argentoratum (Strassburg), and a

third at Vindonissa (Windisch not far from Zürich) not far from the

Raetian frontier. To the lower army belonged the not inconsiderable

fleet on the Rhine. The boundary between the upper and the lower

army lay between Andernach and Remagen near Brohl,[64] so that

Coblenz and Bingen fell to the upper, Bonn and Cologne to the lower

military district. On the left bank there belonged to the upper German

administrative circuit the districts of the Helvetii (Switzerland), the

Sequani (Besançon), the Lingones (Langres), the Rauraci (Basle), the

Triboci (Alsace), the Nemetes (Spires), and the Vangiones (Worms); to

the more restricted lower German circuit belonged the district of the

Ubii, or rather the colony Agrippina (Cologne), those of the Tungri

(Tongern), the Menapii (Brabant), and the Batavi, while the cantons

situated farther to the west, including Metz and Treves, were placed

under the different governors of the three Gauls. While this separation

has merely administrative significance, on the other hand the varying

extent of the two jurisdictions on the right bank coincides with the

varying relations to their neighbours and the advancing or receding

of the bounds of the Roman rule conditioned by those relations. With

these neighbours confronting them, matters on the lower and on the

upper Rhine were regulated in ways so diverse, and the course of events

was so thoroughly different that here the provincial separation became

historically of the most decisive importance. Let us look first at the

development of things on the lower Rhine.

[Sidenote: Lower Germany.]

We have formerly described how far the Romans had subjugated the

Germans on both banks of the Rhine. The Germanic Batavi had been

peacefully united with the empire not by Caesar, but not long

afterwards, perhaps by Drusus (p. 28). They were settled in the Rhine

delta, that is on the left bank of the Rhine and on the islands formed

by its arms, upwards as far at least as the Old Rhine, and so nearly

from Antwerp to Utrecht and Leyden in Zealand and southern Holland, on

territory originally Celtic--at least the local names are predominantly

Celtic; their name is still borne by the Betuwe, the lowland between

the Waal and the Leck with the capital Noviomagus, now Nimeguen. They

were, especially compared with the restless and refractory Celts,

obedient and useful subjects, and hence occupied a distinctive position

in the aggregate, and particularly in the military system, of the

Roman empire. They remained quite free from taxation, but were on

the other hand drawn upon more largely than any other canton in the

recruiting; this one canton furnished to the army 1000 horsemen and

9000 foot soldiers; besides, the men of the imperial body-guard were

taken especially from them. The command of these Batavian divisions

was conferred exclusively on native Batavi. The Batavi were accounted

indisputably not merely as the best riders and swimmers of the army,

but also as the model of true soldiers, and in this case certainly the

good pay of the Batavian body-guard, as well as the privilege of the

nobles to serve as officers, considerably confirmed their loyalty.

These Germans accordingly had taken no part either preparatory to, or

consequent upon, the disaster of Varus; and if Augustus, under the

first impression of the terrible news, discharged his Batavian guard,

he soon became convinced of the groundlessness of his suspicion, and

the troop was a short time afterwards reinstated.

[Sidenote: Cannenefates.]

[Sidenote: Frisians.]

[Sidenote: Chauci.]

On the other bank of the Rhine next to the Batavi, in the modern

Kennemer district (North Holland beyond Amsterdam), dwelt the

Cannenefates, closely related to them but less numerous; they are not

merely named among the tribes subjugated by Tiberius, but were also

treated like the Batavi in the furnishing of soldiers. The Frisians,

adjoining these further on, in the coast district that is still named

after them, as far as the lower Ems, submitted to Drusus and obtained

a position similar to that of the Batavi. There was imposed on them

instead of tribute simply the delivery of a number of bullocks' hides

for the wants of the army; on the other hand they had to furnish

comparatively large numbers of men for the Roman service. They were the

most faithful allies of Drusus as afterwards of Germanicus, useful to

him in constructing canals as well as especially after the unfortunate

North Sea expeditions (p. 53). They were followed on the east by the

Chauci, a widely extended tribe of sailors and fishermen along the

coast of the North Sea on both sides of the Weser, perhaps from the

Ems to the Elbe; they were brought into subjection to the Romans

by Drusus at the same time with the Frisians, but not, like these,

without resistance. All these Germanic coast tribes submitted either by

agreement or at any rate without any severe struggle to the new rule,

and as they had taken no part in the rising of the Cherusci, they still

continued after the battle of Varus in their earlier relations to the

Roman empire; even from the more remote cantons of the Frisians and the

Chauci the garrisons were not at that time withdrawn, and the latter

still furnished a contingent to the campaigns of Germanicus. On the

renewed evacuation of Germany in the year 17 the poor and distant land

of the Chauci, difficult of protection, seems certainly to have been

given up; at least there are no later evidences of the continuance

of the Roman dominion there, and some decades later we find them

independent. But all the land westward of the lower Ems remained with

the empire, whose boundary thus included the modern Netherlands. The

defence of this part of the imperial frontier against the Germans not

belonging to the empire was left in the main to the subject maritime

cantons themselves.

[Sidenote: Limes and desert-frontier on the lower Rhine.]

Farther up the stream a different course was taken; a frontier-road

was here marked off, and the land lying between it and the Rhine

was depopulated. With the frontier-road drawn at a greater or less

distance from the Rhine, the _Limes_,[65] was associated the control

of frontier-intercourse, as the crossing of this road was forbidden

altogether by night, and, as regards armed men, by day, and was

permitted in the case of others, as a rule, only under special

precautions for security and on payment of the prescribed transit-dues.

Such a road was drawn opposite to the headquarters on the lower Rhine,

in what is now Münster, by Tiberius after the disaster of Varus, at

some distance from the Rhine, seeing that between it and the river

stretched the "Caesian forest," the more precise position of which is

not known. Similar arrangements must have been made at the same time in

the valleys of the Ruhr and the Sieg as far as that of the Wied, where

the province of the lower Rhine ended. This road did not necessarily

require to be militarily occupied and arranged for defence, although of

course the defence of the frontier and the fortification of it always

aimed at making the frontier-road as far as possible secure. A chief

means for protecting the frontier was the depopulation of the tract

of land between the river and the road. "The tribes on the right bank

of the Rhine," says a well-informed author of the time of Tiberius,

"have been in part transferred by the Romans to the left bank, in part

withdrawn of their own accord into the interior." This applied, in what

is now the Münster country, to the Germanic stocks earlier settled

there of the Usipes, Tencteri, Tubantes. In the campaigns of Germanicus

these appear dislodged from the Rhine, but still in the region of the

Lippe, afterwards, probably in consequence of those very expeditions,

farther southward opposite to Mentz. Their old home lay thenceforth

desolate, and formed the extensive pasture-country reserved for the

herds of the lower Germanic army, on which in the year 58 first the

Frisii and then the Amsivarii, wandering homeless, thought of settling,

without being able to procure leave from the Roman authorities to

do so. Farther to the south at least a portion of the Sugambri, who

likewise were subjected in great part to the same treatment, remained

settled on the right bank,[66] while other smaller tribes were wholly

dislodged. The scanty population tolerated within the Limes were, as a

matter of course, subjects of the empire, as is confirmed by the Roman

levy taking place among the Sugambri.

[Sidenote: Conflicts with the Frisii and Chauci under Claudius.]

In this way matters were arranged on the lower Rhine after the

abandonment of the more comprehensive projects, and thus a not

inconsiderable territory on the right bank was still held by the

Romans. But various inconvenient complications arose in connection

with it. Towards the end of the reign of Tiberius (28) the Frisians,

in consequence of intolerable oppression in the levying of tribute in

itself small, revolted from the empire, slew the people employed in

levying it, and besieged the Roman commandant acting there, with the

rest of the Roman soldiers and civilians sojourning in the territory,

in the fortress of Flevum, where, previous to the extension of the

Zuyder See that took place in the Middle Ages, lay the eastmost mouth

of the Rhine, near the modern island Vlieland beside the Texel. The

rising assumed such proportions that both armies of the Rhine marched

in concert against the Frisians; but still the governor Lucius Apronius

accomplished nothing. The Frisians gave up the siege of the fortress,

when the Roman fleet brought up the legions; but it was difficult to

get near the Frisians themselves in a country so much intersected;

several Roman corps were destroyed in detail, and the Roman advanced

guard was so thoroughly defeated that even the dead bodies of the

fallen were left in the power of the enemy. The matter was not brought

to a decisive action, nor yet to a true subjugation; Tiberius, the

older he grew, became ever less inclined to larger enterprises, which

gave to the general in command a position of power. With this state of

things was connected the fact that in the immediately succeeding years

the neighbours of the Frisians, the Chauci, became very troublesome

to the Romans; in the year 41 the governor Publius Gabinius Secundus

had to undertake an expedition against them, and six years later (47)

they even pillaged far and wide the coast of Gaul with their light

piratical vessels under the leadership of the Roman deserter Gannascus,

by birth one of the Cannenefates. Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo, nominated

governor of Lower Germany by Claudius, put a stop with his fleet to

these forerunners of the Saxons and Normans, and afterwards vigorously

brought back the Frisians to obedience, by organising anew their

commonwealth and stationing a Roman garrison among them.

[Sidenote: The occupation of the right bank abandoned.]

Corbulo had the intention of chastising the Chauci also; at his

instigation Gannascus was put out of the way--against a deserter he

held himself entitled to take this course--and he was on the point

of crossing the Ems and advancing into the country of the Chauci,

when not only did he receive counter-orders from Rome, but the Roman

government wholly and completely altered its attitude on the lower

Rhine. The emperor Claudius directed the governor to remove all Roman

garrisons from the right bank. We may well conceive that the imperial

general with bitter words commended the good fortune of the free

commanders of Rome in former days; in this step certainly there was

a conclusive admission of defeat, which had been but partially owned

after the battle of Varus. Probably this restriction of the Roman

occupation of Germany, which was not occasioned by any pressure of

immediate necessity, was called forth by the resolve just then adopted

to occupy Britain, and finds its justification in the fact that the

troops were not sufficient for accomplishing both objects at once.

That the order was executed, and matters remained afterwards in that

position, is proved by the absence of Roman military inscriptions on

the whole right bank of the lower Rhine.[67] Only isolated points

for crossing and sally-ports, such as, in particular, Deutz opposite

Cologne, formed exceptions from this general rule. The military road

keeps here to the left bank and strictly to the course of the Rhine,

while the traffic-route running behind it, cutting off the windings,

pursues the straight line of communication. Here on the right bank of

the Rhine there is no evidence of Roman military roads, either through

the discovery of milestones or otherwise.

[Sidenote: Its subsequent position.]

The withdrawal of the garrisons did not imply giving up possession,

strictly speaking, of the right bank in this province. It was looked

upon by the Romans thenceforth somewhat as the commandant of a fortress

looks upon the ground that lies under his cannon. The Cannenefates

and at least a part of the Frisians[68] were afterwards subject, as

before, to the empire. We have already remarked that subsequently

in the Münster country the herds of the legions still pastured, and

the Germans were not allowed to settle there. But the government

thenceforth relied--for the defence of such border-territory on the

right bank as still existed in this province--in the north on the

Cannenefates and the Frisians, and farther up the stream substantially

on the space left desolate; and, if it did not directly forbid, at

any rate did not give scope to Roman settlement there. The altar

stone of a private person found at Altenberg (circuit of Mülheim),

on the river Dhün, is almost the only evidence of Roman inhabitants

in these regions. This is the more remarkable, as the prosperity of

Cologne would, if special hindrances had not here stood in the way,

have of itself carried Roman civilisation far and wide on the other

bank. Often enough Roman troops may have traversed these extensive

regions, perhaps even have kept the roads--which were here laid out in

large number during the Augustan period--in some measure passable, and

possibly laid out new ones; sparse settlers, partly remains of the old

Germanic population, partly colonists from the empire, may have settled

here, similar to those that we shall soon find in the earlier imperial

period on the right bank of the upper Rhine; but the highways, like

the possessions, lacked the stamp of durability. There was no wish to

undertake here a labour of similar extent and difficulty to that which

we shall become acquainted with further on in the upper province, or

to provide here, as was done there, military defence and fortification

for the frontier of the empire. Therefore the lower Rhine was crossed

doubtless by Roman rule, but not, like the upper Rhine, also by Roman

culture.

[Sidenote: The situation in Gaul and Germany after the fall of Nero.]

For the double task of keeping the neighbouring Gaul in obedience and

of keeping the Germans of the right bank aloof from Gaul, the army of

the lower Rhine would, even after abandoning the occupation of the

region on the right of the river, have quite sufficed, and the peace

without and within would not presumably have been interrupted, had not

the downfall of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, and the civil or rather

military war thereby called forth, exercised a momentous influence

on these relations. The insurrection of the Celtic land under the

leadership of Vindex was no doubt defeated by the two Germanic armies;

but Nero's fall nevertheless ensued, and when the Spanish army as well

as the imperial guard in Rome appointed a successor to him, the armies

of the Rhine did the same; and in the beginning of the year 69 the

greater portion of these troops crossed the Alps to settle the point on

the battle-fields of Italy, whether its ruler was to be called Marcus

or Aulus. In May of the same year the new emperor Vitellius followed,

after arms had decided in his favour, accompanied by the remainder of

the good soldiers inured to war. The blanks in the garrisons of the

Rhine were no doubt filled up for the exigency by recruits hastily

levied in Gaul; but the whole land knew that they were not the old

legions, and it soon became apparent that these were not coming back.

If the new ruler had had in his power the army that placed him on the

throne, at least a portion of them must have returned to the Rhine

immediately after the defeat of Otho in April; but the insubordination

of the soldiers still more than the new complication which soon set in

with the proclamation of Vespasian as emperor in the East, retained the

German legions in Italy.

[Sidenote: Preparations for the insurrection.]

Gaul was in the most fearful excitement. The rising of Vindex was, as

we formerly remarked (p. 82), in itself directed not against the rule

of Rome but against the rulers for the time being; but it was none the

less on that account a warfare between the armies of the Rhine and the

levy _en masse_ of the great majority of the Celtic cantons; and these

were none the less subjected to pillage and maltreatment resembling

that of the conquered. The tone of feeling which subsisted between the

provincials and the soldiers was shown, for instance, by the treatment

which the canton of the Helvetii experienced as the troops destined for

Italy marched through it. Because a courier despatched by the adherents

of Vitellius to Pannonia had here been seized, the columns on the march

from the one side, and the Romans stationed as a garrison in Raetia

on the other, entered the canton, pillaged the villages far and wide,

particularly what is now Baden near Zürich, chased those who had fled

to the mountains out of their lurking-places, and put them to death

by thousands or sold the captives under martial law. Although the

capital Aventicum (Avenches, near Murten) submitted without resistance,

the agitators of the army demanded that it should be razed, and all

that the general granted was that the question should be referred

not, forsooth, to the emperor, but to the soldiers of the great

headquarters; these sat in judgment on the fate of the town, and it was

merely the turn of their caprice that saved the place from destruction.

Outrages of this nature brought the provincials to extremities; even

before Vitellius left Gaul, a certain Mariccus, from the canton of the

Boii, dependent on the Haedui, came forward a god on earth, as he said,

and destined to restore the freedom of the Celts; and people flocked in

troops to his banner. But the exasperation in the Celtic country was

not of so very great moment. The very rising of Vindex had most clearly

shown how utterly incapable the Gauls were of releasing themselves from

the Roman embrace.

[Sidenote: Rising of the Batavian auxiliaries.]

[Sidenote: Civilis.]

But the tone of feeling of the Germanic districts reckoned as belonging

to Gaul--in the modern Netherlands--of the Batavi, the Cannenefates,

the Frisians, whose distinctive position has already been dwelt on, had

a somewhat greater importance; and it happened that, on the one hand,

these very tribes had been exasperated to the utmost, and on the other,

that their contingents were accidentally to be found in Gaul. The bulk

of the Batavian troops, 8000 men, assigned to the 14th legion, had for

a considerable time a place along with the latter in the army of the

upper Rhine, and had then under Claudius, on occasion of the occupying

of Britain, gone to that island, where this corps shortly before had,

by its incomparable valour, gained the decisive battle under Paullinus

for the Romans; from this day onward it occupied indisputably the first

place among all the divisions of the Roman army. When it was recalled

on account of this very distinction by Nero, in order to go off with

him to the war in the East, the revolution breaking out in Gaul had

brought about a quarrel between the legion and its auxiliary troops;

the former, faithfully devoted to Nero, hastened to Italy; the Batavi,

on the other hand, refused to follow. Perhaps this was connected with

the fact that two of their most noted officers, the brothers Paulus

and Civilis, had, without any reason and without respect to many years

of faithful service and honourable wounds, been shortly before put on

trial as suspected of high treason, and the former executed, the latter

placed in captivity. After the downfall of Nero, to which the revolt of

the Batavian cohorts had materially contributed, Galba released Civilis

and sent the Batavians back to their old headquarters in Britain. While

they, on the march thither, were encamped among the Lingones (Langres),

the legions of the Rhine revolted from Galba and proclaimed Vitellius

emperor. The Batavi, after considerable hesitation, ultimately joined

the movement; Vitellius did not forgive them for this hesitation, but

did not venture directly to call to account the leader of the powerful

corps.

[Sidenote: Progress of the movement.]

Thus the Batavians had marched with the legions of lower Germany to

Italy and had fought with their usual valour in the battle of Betriacum

for Vitellius, while their old legionary comrades confronted them in

the army of Otho. But the arrogance of the Germans exasperated their

Roman comrades in victory, however much these acknowledged their valour

in battle; the very generals in command did not trust them, and even

made an attempt to divide by detaching them--a course, which, in this

war, where the soldiers commanded and the generals obeyed, was not

capable of being carried out, and had almost cost the general his life.

After the victory they were commissioned to accompany their hostile

comrades of the 14th legion to Britain; but when matters came to a

skirmish between the two at Turin, the latter alone went to Britain,

and the Batavians to Germany. Meanwhile Vespasian had been proclaimed

emperor in the East, and, while in consequence of this Vitellius

gave to the Batavian cohorts marching orders for Italy as well as

ordered new comprehensive levies among the Batavi, commissioners of

Vespasian opened communications with the Batavian officers to hinder

this departure, and to provoke in Germany itself a rising which

should detain the troops there. Civilis entered into the suggestion.

He resorted to his home, and gained easily the assent of his own

people as well as the neighbouring Cannenefates and Frisians. The

insurrection broke out among the former; the camps of the two cohorts

in the neighbourhood were surprised and the Roman posts seized; the

Roman recruits fought ill; soon Civilis with his cohort--which he had

caused to follow, ostensibly to employ it against the insurgents--threw

himself openly into the movement, along with the three Germanic cantons

renounced allegiance to Vitellius, and summoned the other Batavians and

Cannenefates, who just then were breaking up from Mentz for the march

to Italy, to join him.

[Sidenote: Its character.]

All this was more a soldiers' rising than an insurrection of the

province, or even a Germanic war. If at that time the Rhine legions

were fighting with those of the Danube, and further with these and

the army of the Euphrates, it was but in keeping that the soldiers of

the second class, and above all their most distinguished troop, the

Batavian, should enter independently into this divisional warfare. Any

one who compares this movement among the cohorts of the Batavians and

the Germans on the left of the Rhine with the insurrection of those

on the right bank of the Rhine under Augustus, may not overlook the

fact, that in the later rising the alae and cohorts took up the part

of the general levy of the Cherusci; and, if the perfidious officer

of Varus released his nation from the Roman rule, the Batavian leader

acted in the commission of Vespasian; in fact, perhaps, on the secret

directions of the governor of his province privately inclined towards

Vespasian, and the rising in the first instance was directed simply

against Vitellius. It is true that the position of things was such that

this soldiers' revolt might change itself at any moment into a German

war of the most dangerous kind. The same Roman troops who covered the

Rhine against the Germans of the right bank were, in consequence of the

corps-warfare, placed in an attitude of hostility to the Germans on

the left bank; the parts were of such a nature, that it seemed almost

easier to exchange them than to carry them out. Civilis himself may

possibly have left it to depend on the sequel, whether the movement

would end in a change of emperor or in the expulsion of the Romans from

Gaul by the Germans.

[Sidenote: State of the armies on the Rhine.]

The command of the two armies on the Rhine was held at this time, after

the governor of lower Germany had been made emperor, by his former

colleague in upper Germany, Hordeonius Flaccus, a gouty man advanced in

years, without energy and without authority, either, moreover, in fact

secretly holding to Vespasian, or at any rate very much suspected of

such faithlessness by the legions, who zealously adhered to the emperor

of their own making. It is characteristic of him and of his position

that, to clear himself of the suspicion of treason, he gave orders that

the government despatches on arrival should be sent unopened to the

eagle-bearers of the legions, and these should read them in the first

instance to the soldiers, before they forwarded them to their address.

Of the four legions of the lower army which had primarily to do with

the insurgents two, the 5th and the 15th, were stationed under the

legate Munius Lupercus in the headquarters at Vetera; the 16th, under

Numisius Rufus, in Novaesium (Neuss); the 1st, under Herennius Gallus,

in Bonna (Bonn). Of the upper army, which then numbered only three

legions,[69] one, the 21st, remained in its stated quarters Vindonissa,

aloof from these events, if it had not rather been drawn off wholly to

Italy; the two others, the 4th Macedonian and the 22d, were stationed

at the headquarters Mentz, where Flaccus also was present; and in point

of fact, his able legate Dillius Vocula exercised the chief command.

The legions had throughout only half of their full complement, and most

of the soldiers were half-invalids or recruits.

[Sidenote: First conflicts.]

[Sidenote: Participation of the Germans on the right of the Rhine.]

Civilis, at the head of a small number of regular troops, but of the

collective levy of the Batavi, Cannenefates, and Frisians, advanced

from his home to the attack. In the first instance, on the Rhine he met

with remnants of the Roman garrisons driven from the northern cantons

and a division of the Roman Rhenish fleet; when he attacked them, not

merely did the ships' crews, consisting in great part of Batavians, go

over to him, but also a cohort of the Tungri--it was the first revolt

of a Gallic division; such Italian soldiers as were present were slain

or taken prisoners. This success brought at length the Germans on the

right of the Rhine into the movement. What they had long vainly hoped

for--the rising of the Roman subjects on the other bank--now came to

be fulfilled, and as well the Chauci and the Frisians on the coast,

as above all, the Bructeri on both sides of the upper Ems as far down

as the Lippe, the Tencteri on the middle Rhine opposite to Cologne,

and in lesser measure the tribes adjoining these on the south--Usipes,

Mattiaci, Chatti--threw themselves into the struggle. When, on the

orders of Flaccus, the two weak legions marched out from Vetera against

the insurgents, these could already confront them with a numerous

contingent drawn from beyond the Rhine; and the battle ended, like the

combat on the Rhine, with a defeat of the Romans through the defection

of the Batavian cavalry, which belonged to the garrison of Vetera, and

through the bad behaviour of the cavalry of the Ubii and of the Treveri.

[Sidenote: Siege of Vetera.]

The insurgents and the Germans who flocked to them proceeded to invest

and besiege the headquarters of the lower army. During this siege news

of the events on the lower Rhine reached the other Batavian cohorts

in the neighbourhood of Mentz; they at once wheeled round towards

the north. Instead of ordering them to be cut down, the weak-minded

commander-in-chief allowed them to go, and when the commandant of the

legion in Bonn sought to intercept them, Flaccus did not support him as

he might have done and had even at first promised. So the brave Germans

dispersed the Bonn legion and succeeded in joining Civilis--henceforth

the compact core of his army, in which now the banners of the

Roman cohorts stood by the side of the animal-standards from the

sacred groves of the Germans. But still the Batavian held, at least

ostensibly, by Vespasian; he swore in the Roman troops in Vespasian's

name, and summoned the garrison of Vetera to join him in declaring for

the latter. These troops, however, saw in this, probably with warrant,

a mere attempt to overreach them, and repelled it as resolutely as they

repelled the assailing hosts of the enemy, who soon found themselves

compelled by the superiority of Roman tactics to change the siege into

a blockade. But, as the leaders of the Roman army had been taken by

surprise in these events, provisions were scarce and speedy relief was

urgently called for. In order to bring it, Flaccus and Vocula set out

with their whole force from Mentz, drew to themselves on the way the

two legions from Bonna and Novaesium as well as the auxiliary troops of

the Gallic cantons appearing at the word of command in large numbers,

and approached Vetera.

[Sidenote: Vocula.]

But instead of throwing at once the whole force from within and without

on the besiegers, however great their superiority in numbers, Vocula

pitched his camp at Gelduba (Gellep on the Rhine, not far from Krefeld)

a long day's march distant from Vetera, while Flaccus lay farther back.

The worthlessness of the so-called general and the ever increasing

demoralisation of the troops, above all, the distrust towards the

officers, which frequently went so far as to maltreat and attempt to

kill them, can alone at least explain this halting. Thus the mischief

gradually thickened on all sides. All Germany seemed desirous to take

part in the war; while the besieging army constantly obtained new

contingents from that quarter, other bands passed over the Rhine,

which in this dry summer was unusually low, partly in the rear of the

Romans into the cantons of the Ubii and the Treveri to lay waste the

valley of the Moselle, partly below Vetera into the region of the Maas

and the Scheldt; further bands appeared before Mentz and made pretext

of besieging it. Then came the accounts of the catastrophe in Italy.

On the news of the second battle at Betriacum in the autumn of the

year 69 the Germanic legions gave up the cause of Vitellius as lost

and took the oath, though reluctantly, to Vespasian, perhaps in the

hope that Civilis, who had in fact inscribed the name of Vespasian on

his banners, would then make his peace. But the German swarms, who

had meanwhile poured themselves over all northern Gaul, had not come

to install the Flavian dynasty; even if Civilis had ever wished this,

he now had no longer the power. He threw off the mask, and openly

expressed--what indeed was long settled--that the Germans of north Gaul

intended, with the help of their free countrymen, to shake off the

Roman rule.

[Sidenote: Relief of Vetera.]

But the fortune of war changed. Civilis attempted to surprise the camp

of Gelduba; the attack began successfully, and the defection of the

cohorts of the Nervii brought Vocula's little band into a critical

position. Then suddenly two Spanish cohorts fell on the rear of the

Germans; what threatened to be a defeat was converted into a brilliant

victory; the flower of the assailing army remained on the field of

battle. Vocula indeed did not advance at once against Vetera, as he

possibly might have done, but he penetrated into the besieged town some

days later after a renewed vehement conflict with the enemy. It is true

that he brought no provisions; and, as the river was in the power of

the enemy, these had to be procured by the land-route from Novaesium,

where Flaccus was encamped. The first convoy passed through; but the

enemy, having meanwhile assembled again, attacked the second column

with provisions on its way, and compelled it to throw itself into

Gelduba. Vocula went off thither to its support with his troops and a

part of the old garrison of Vetera. When they had arrived at Gelduba,

the men refused to return to Vetera and to take upon themselves the

further sufferings of the siege in prospect; instead of this they

marched to Novaesium, and Vocula, who knew that the remnant of the old

garrison of Vetera was in some measure provisioned, had for good or

evil to follow.

[Sidenote: Mutiny of Roman troops.]

In Novaesium meanwhile mutiny had broken out. The soldiers had come to

learn that a largess destined for them by Vitellius had reached the

general, and compelled its distribution in the name of Vespasian. They

had scarcely received it, when, in the wild carousing which ensued upon

the largess, the old grudge of the soldiers broke out afresh; they

pillaged the house of the general who had betrayed the army of the

Rhine to the general of the Syrian legions, slew him, and would have

prepared the same fate for Vocula, if the latter had not escaped in

disguise. Thereupon they once more proclaimed Vitellius emperor, not

knowing that he was already dead. When this news came to the camp, the

better part of the soldiers, and in particular the two upper German

legions, began in some measure to reflect; they again exchanged the

effigy of Vitellius on their standards for that of Vespasian, and

placed themselves under the orders of Vocula; he led them to Mentz,

where he remained during the rest of the winter 69-70. Civilis occupied

Gelduba, and thereby cut off Vetera, which was most closely blockaded;

the camps of Novaesium and Bonna were still held.

[Sidenote: Insurrection in Gaul.]

Hitherto the Gallic land, apart from the few insurgent Germanic cantons

in the north, had kept firmly by Rome. Certainly partisanship ran

through the several cantons; among the Tungri, for example, the Batavi

had a strong body of adherents, and the bad behaviour of the Gallic

auxiliary troops during the whole campaign may probably have been in

part called forth by such a temper of hostility to the Romans. But

even among the insurgents there was a considerable party favourably

disposed to Rome; a Batavian of note, Claudius Labeo, waged a partisan

warfare not without success against his countrymen in his home and its

neighbourhood, and the nephew of Civilis, Julius Briganticus, fell in

one of these combats at the head of a band of Roman horse. All the

Gallic cantons had without more ado complied with the injunction to

send contingents; the Ubii, although of Germanic descent, were in this

war mindful simply of their Romanism, and they as well as the Treveri

had offered brave and successful resistance to the Germans invading

their territory. It is easy to understand how this was so. The position

of things in Gaul was still much as it was in the days of Caesar and

Ariovistus; a liberation of their Gallic home from the Roman dominion

by means of those hordes, which, in order to lend to Civilis the help

of his countrymen, were just then pillaging the valleys of the Moselle,

Maas, and Scheldt, was tantamount to a surrender of the land to its

Germanic neighbours; in this war, which had grown out of a feud between

two corps of Roman troops into a conflict between Rome and Germany,

the Gauls were, properly speaking, nothing but the stake and the

booty. That the tone of feeling among the Gauls, in spite of all their

well-founded general and special complaints as to the Roman government,

was predominantly anti-Germanic, and that the materials for kindling

such a national rising suddenly bursting into flame and reckless of

consequences, as had spread through the people in an earlier time, were

wanting in this Gaul now half-Romanised, events up to this time had

most clearly shown. But amidst the constant misfortunes of the Roman

army the courage of the Gauls hostile to the Romans gradually grew

stronger, and their defection completed the catastrophe. Two Treveri

of note, Julius Classicus, the commander of the Treverian cavalry, and

Julius Tutor, commandant of the garrisons on the banks of the middle

Rhine, Julius Sabinus one of the Lingones, descended, as he at least

boasted, from a bastard of Caesar, and some other men of like mind from

different cantons, professed in thoughtless Celtic fashion to discern

that the destruction of Rome was written in the stars and announced to

the world by the burning of the Capitol (Dec. 69).

[Sidenote: The Gallic empire.]

So they resolved to set aside the Roman rule and to set up a Gallic

empire. For this purpose they took the course of Arminius. Vocula

allowed himself to be really induced by falsified reports of these

Roman officers to set out, with the contingents placed under their

command and a part of the Mentz garrison, in the spring of 70 for the

lower Rhine, in order with these troops and the legions of Bonna

and Novaesium to relieve the hard-pressed Vetera. On the march from

Novaesium to Vetera, Classicus and the officers in concert with him

left the Roman army and proclaimed the new Gallic empire. Vocula led

the legions back to Novaesium; Classicus pitched his camp immediately

in front of it; Vetera could not now hold out long; the Romans could

not but expect after its fall to find themselves confronted by the

whole power of the enemy.

[Sidenote: Capitulation of the Romans.]

The Roman troops refused to face this prospect and entered into a

capitulation with the revolted officers. In vain Vocula attempted once

more to urge the ties of discipline and of honour; the legions of Rome

allowed a Roman deserter from the 1st legion to stab the brave general

on the order of Classicus, and themselves delivered up the other chief

officers in chains to the representative of the empire of Gaul, who

thereupon made the soldiers swear allegiance to that empire. The same

oath was taken at the hands of the perfidious officers by the garrison

of Vetera, which, compelled by famine, at once surrendered, and

likewise by the garrison of Mentz, where but a few individuals avoided

disgrace by flight or death. The whole proud army of the Rhine, the

first army of the empire, had surrendered to its own auxiliaries; Rome

had surrendered to Gaul.

[Sidenote: End of the Gallic empire.]

It was a tragedy, and at the same time a farce. The Gallic empire

lapsed, as it could not fail to do. Civilis and his Germans were

doubtless, in the first instance, well content that the quarrel in the

Roman camp delivered the one as well as the other half of their foes

into their hands; but he had no thought of recognising that empire, and

still less had his allies from the right bank of the Rhine.

As little would the Gauls themselves have anything to do with it--a

result, to which certainly the split between the eastern districts

and the rest of the country, which had already become apparent at the

rising of Vindex, materially contributed. The Treveri and the Lingones,

whose leading men had instigated that camp-conspiracy, stood by their

leaders, but they remained virtually alone; only the Vangiones and

Triboci joined them. The Sequani, into whose territory the Lingones

marched to induce their accession, drove them summarily homeward. The

esteemed Remi, the leading canton in Belgica, convoked the diet of the

three Gauls, and, although there was no lack there of orators on behalf

of political freedom, it resolved simply to dissuade the Treveri from

the revolt. How the constitution of the new empire would have turned

out, had it been established, it is difficult to say; we learn only

that Sabinus, the great-grandson of Caesar's concubine, named himself

also Caesar, and in this capacity allowed himself to be beaten by the

Sequani; whereas Classicus, who had not such ascendency at his command,

assumed the insignia of Roman magistracy, and thus played perhaps the

part of republican proconsul. In keeping with this there exists a coin,

which must have been struck by Classicus or his adherents, exhibiting

the head of Gallia, as the coins of the Roman republic show that of

Roma, and by its side the symbol of the legion, with the genuinely

audacious legend of "fidelity" (_fides_). At first, doubtless, on the

Rhine the imperialists, in concert with the insurgent Germans, had

full freedom. The remnants of the two legions that had capitulated in

Vetera were put to death, contrary to the terms of surrender and to the

will of Civilis; the two from Novaesium and Bonna were sent to Treves;

all the Roman camps on the Rhine, large and small, with the exception

of Mogontiacum, were burnt. The Agrippinenses found themselves in the

worst plight. The imperialists had certainly confined themselves to

requiring from them the oath of allegiance; but the Germans in this

case did not forget that they were properly speaking, the Ubii. A

message of the Tencteri from the right bank of the Rhine--this was one

of the tribes whose old home the Romans had laid desolate and used

as pasture-ground, and which had in consequence of this been obliged

to seek other abodes--demanded the razing of this chief seat of the

Germanic apostates, and the execution of all their citizens of Roman

descent. This would probably have been resolved on had not Civilis,

who was personally under obligation to them, as well as the German

prophetess Veleda in the canton of the Bructeri, who had predicted

this victory, and whose authority the whole insurgent army recognised,

interceded on their behalf.

[Sidenote: Advent of the Romans.]

The victors were not left long to contend over the booty. The

imperialists certainly gave the assurance that the civil war in Italy

had broken out, that all the provinces were overrun by the enemy,

and Vespasian was probably dead; but the heavy arm of Rome was soon

enough felt. The newly confirmed government could despatch its best

generals and numerous legions to the Rhine; and certainly an imposing

display of power was there needed. Annius Gallus took up the command

in the upper, Petillius Cerialis in the lower province; the latter, an

impetuous and often incautious, but brave and capable officer, took

the really serious action. Besides the 21st legion from Vindonissa,

five came from Italy, three from Spain, one along with the fleet from

Britain, and, in addition, a further corps from the Raetian garrison.

This and the 21st legion were the first to arrive. The imperialists

had possibly talked of blocking the passes of the Alps; but nothing

was done, and the whole country of the upper Rhine lay open as far

as Mentz. The two Mentz legions had no doubt sworn allegiance to the

Gallic empire, and at first offered resistance; but, so soon as they

perceived that a larger Roman army confronted them, they returned to

obedience, and the Vangiones and Triboci immediately followed their

example. Even the Lingones submitted--merely upon a promise of mild

treatment--without striking a blow on the part of their 70,000 men

capable of bearing arms.[70] The Treveri themselves had almost done the

same; but they were prevented from doing so by the nobility. The two

surviving legions of the lower Rhenish army that were stationed here

had, on the first news of the approach of the Romans, torn the Gallic

insignia from their standards, and withdrew to the Mediomatrici that

had remained faithful (Metz), where they submitted to the mercy of the

new general. When Cerialis arrived at the army, he found a good part of

the work already done. The insurgent leaders exerted themselves, it is

true, to the utmost--at that time by their orders the legionary legates

delivered up at Novaesium were put to death--but in a military sense

they were impotent, and their last political move--that of offering the

Roman general himself the sovereignty of the Gallic empire--was worthy

of the beginning. After a short combat Cerialis occupied the capital of

the Treveri, the leaders and the whole council having taken refuge with

the Germans. This was the end of the Gallic empire.

[Sidenote: Last struggles of Civilis.]

More serious was the struggle with the Germans. Civilis, with his

whole fighting strength, the Batavi, the contingent of the Germans,

and the refugee bands of the Gallic insurgents, suddenly assailed the

much weaker Roman army in Treves itself. The Roman camp was already

in his power, and the bridge of the Moselle occupied by him, when his

men, instead of following up the victory which they had won, began

prematurely to pillage, and Cerialis, compensating for his imprudence

by brilliant valour, restored the combat and ultimately drove the

Germans out from the camp and the town. There was no further success of

importance. The Agrippinenses again joined the Romans, and killed the

Germans, who were staying among them, in their houses; a whole Germanic

cohort encamped there was shut up and burnt in its quarters. Whatsoever

in Belgica still held to the Germans was brought back to obedience

by the legion arriving from Britain; a victory of the Cannenefates

over the Roman ships which had landed the legion, and other isolated

successes of the brave Germanic bands, above all, of the more numerous

and better managed Germanic ships, did not change the general position

of the war. On the ruins of Vetera Civilis confronted the foe; but he

had to give way to the Roman army, which had meanwhile been doubled,

and at length, after an obstinate resistance, had to leave his own

home to the enemy. As ever happens, discord ensued in the train of

misfortune. Civilis was no longer sure of his own men, and sought and

found protection from them among his opponents. Late in the autumn of

the year 70 the unequal struggle was decided; the auxiliaries now on

their part surrendered to the burgess-legions, and the priestess Veleda

went as a captive to Rome.

[Sidenote: Nature of the Roman task and its issue.]

When we look back on this war, one of the most singular and most

dreadful in all ages, we cannot but own that hardly ever has an army

had a task set before it equally severe with that of the two Roman

armies on the Rhine in the years 69 and 70. In the course of a few

months soldiers successively of Nero, of the senate, of Galba, of

Vitellius, and of Vespasian; the only support to the dominion of Italy

over the two mighty nations of the Gauls and the Germans, while the

soldiers of the auxiliaries were taken almost entirely, and those

of the legions in great part, from those very nations; deprived of

their best men, mostly without pay, often starving, and beyond all

measure wretchedly led, they were certainly expected to perform feats

physically and morally super-human. They ill sustained the severe

trial. This was less a war between two divisions of the army, like the

other civil wars of this terrible time, than a war of soldiers, and

above all of officers, of the second class against those of the first,

combined with a dangerous insurrection and invasion of the Germans,

and an incidental and insignificant revolt of some Celtic districts.

In Roman military history Cannae and Carrhae and the Teutoburg Forest

are glorious pages compared with the double disgrace of Novaesium; only

a few individual men, not a single troop, preserved a pure escutcheon

amidst the general dishonour. The frightful disorganisation of the

political and, above all, of the military system, which meets us on the

fall of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, appears--more clearly even than

in the leaderless battle of Betriacum--in those events on the Rhine,

to which the history of Rome never before and never after exhibits a

parallel.

[Sidenote: Consequences of the Batavian war.]

The very extent and general diffusion of these misdeeds rendered a

corresponding chastisement impossible. It deserves to be acknowledged

that the new ruler, who happily had remained in person aloof from all

these occurrences, in a genuine statesmanly fashion allowed the past

to be past, and exerted himself only to prevent the repetition of

similar scenes. That the prominent culprits, whether from the ranks

of the troops or from the insurgents, were brought to account for

their crimes, was a matter of course; we may measure the punishment by

the fact that when five years afterwards one of the Gallic insurgent

leaders was discovered in a lurking-place, in which his wife had up to

that time kept him concealed, Vespasian gave him as well as her over

to the executioner. But the renegade legions were allowed to share

in the fighting against the Germans, and to atone for their guilt to

some extent in the hot conflicts at Treves and at Vetera. It is true,

nevertheless, that the four legions of the lower Rhenish army were

all dismissed, as was one of the two upper Rhenish legions that took

part--one would gladly believe that the 22d was spared in honourable

remembrance of its brave legate. Probably a considerable number of the

Batavian cohorts met with the same fate, and not less, apparently, the

cavalry regiment of the Treveri, and perhaps several other specially

prominent troops. Still less than against the rebellious soldiers could

proceedings be taken with the full severity of the law against the

insurgent Celtic and German cantons; that the Roman legions demanded

the razing of the Treverian colony of Augustus--this time for the

sake not of booty but of vengeance--is at least as intelligible as

the destruction, desired by the Germans, of the town of the Ubii;

but as Civilis protected the one so Vespasian protected the other.

Even the Germans on the left of the Rhine had, on the whole, their

previous position left to them. But probably--we are here without

certain tradition--there was introduced in the levy and the employment

of the _auxilia_ an essential change, which diminished the danger

involved in the auxiliary system. The Batavi retained freedom from

taxation and a still privileged position as regards service; a part

of them, not altogether inconsiderable, had withal championed in arms

the cause of the Romans. But the Batavian troops were considerably

diminished, and, while hitherto--as it would appear of right--officers

had been placed over them from their own nobility, and the same

had been at least frequently done as respects the other Germanic

and Celtic troops, the officers of the _alae_ and _cohortes_ were

afterwards taken predominantly from the class from which Vespasian

himself was descended--from the good urban middle class of Italy and

of the provincial towns organised after the Italian fashion. Officers

of the position of the Cheruscan Arminius, of the Batavian Civilis,

of the Treverian Classicus do not henceforth recur. As little is the

previous close association of troops levied from the same canton met

with subsequently; on the contrary, the men serve, without distinction

as to their descent, in the most various divisions; this was probably

a lesson which the Roman military administration gathered from this

war. It was another change, probably suggested by this war, that while

hitherto the majority of the auxiliaries employed in Germany were

taken from the Germanic and neighbouring cantons, thenceforth the

Germanic auxiliary troops found preponderantly employment outside of

their native country, just like the Dalmatian and Pannonian troops in

consequence of the war with Bato. Vespasian was a soldier of sagacity

and experience; it is probably in good part a merit of his if we meet

with no later example of revolt of the _auxilia_ against their legions.

[Sidenote: Later attitude of the Roman Germans on the lower Rhine.]

That the insurrection, which we have just narrated, of the Germans on

the left of the Rhine--although it, in consequence of the accidental

completeness of the accounts preserved respecting it, alone gives us a

clear insight into the political and military relations on the lower

Rhine and in Gaul generally, and therefore deserved to be narrated in

more detail--was yet called forth more by outward and accidental causes

than by the inner necessity of things, is proved by the apparently

complete quiet which now ensued there, and by the--so far as we can

see--uninterrupted _status quo_ in this very region. The Roman Germans

were merged in the empire no less completely than the Roman Gauls; of

attempts at insurrection on the part of the former there is no further

mention. At the close of the third century, the Franks invading Gaul

by way of the lower Rhine included in their seizure the Batavian

territory; yet the Batavians maintained themselves in their old though

diminished settlements, as did likewise the Frisians, even during the

confusions of the great migration of peoples, and, so far as we know,

preserved allegiance even to the decaying empire.

[Sidenote: The free Germans on the lower Rhine.]

When we turn from the Romanised to the free Germans to the east of the

Rhine, we find offensive action on their part not less brought to an

end with their participation in that Batavian insurrection, than the

attempts of the Romans to bring about an alteration of the frontier on

a grand scale in those regions came to a close with the expeditions of

Germanicus.

[Sidenote: Bructeri.]

Of the free Germans, those dwelling next to the Roman territory were

the Bructeri on both banks of the middle Ems, and in the region of the

sources of the Ems and Lippe; for which reason they took part before

all the other Germans in the Batavian insurrection. To their canton

belonged the maiden Veleda, who sent forth her countrymen to the war

against Rome and promised them the victory, whose utterance decided

the fate of the town of the Ubii, and to whose high tower the captive

senators and the captured admiral's ship of the Rhenish fleet were

sent. The overthrow of the Batavi affected them also; and perhaps, in

addition, a special counterblow of the Romans since that virgin was

subsequently led as a captive to Rome. This disaster, as well as feuds

with the neighbouring tribes, broke their power; under Nero a king whom

they did not wish was obtruded on them by force of arms on the part of

their neighbours with the passive assistance of the Roman legate.

[Sidenote: Cherusci.]

[Sidenote: Langobardi.]

[Sidenote: Semnones.]

The Cherusci, in the region of the upper Weser, in the time of

Augustus and Tiberius the leading canton in central Germany, is seldom

mentioned after the death of Arminius, but always as sustaining

good relations to the Romans. When the civil war, which must have

continued to rage among them even after the fall of Arminius, had

swept away the whole family of their princes, they requested from the

Roman government the last of that house, Italicus, a brother's son

of Arminius living in Italy, to be their ruler; it is true that the

return home of one who was brave but answered more to his name than to

his lineage, kindled the feud afresh, and, when he was driven off by

his own people, the Langobardi placed him once more on the tottering

throne. One of his successors, king Chariomerus, so earnestly took the

side of the Romans in Domitian's war with the Chatti, that he after

its close, when driven away by the Chatti, fled to the Romans and

invoked--although vainly--their intervention. Through those perpetual

inward and outward feuds the Cheruscan people was so weakened that it

henceforth disappears from active politics. The name of the Marsi is

no longer met with at all after the expeditions of Germanicus. That

the tribes dwelling farther to the east on the Elbe as well as all

the more remote Germans took as little part in the struggles of the

Batavians and their allies in the years 69 and 70, as these took in the

German wars under Augustus and Tiberius may, considering the detailed

character of the narrative, be described as certain. Where they meet

us subsequently they never appear in a hostile attitude to the Romans.

That the Langobardi reinstated the Roman king of the Cherusci, has

already been mentioned. Masuus, the king of the Semnones, and--what

is remarkable--along with him the prophetess Ganna, who was held in

high repute among this tribe famous for its special credulity, visited

the emperor Domitian in Rome, and met with a friendly reception at

his court. In the regions from the Weser to the Elbe during these

centuries various feuds may have raged, the balance of power may in

various cases have shifted, various cantons may have changed their name

or joined another combination; as regards their relations to the Romans

a permanent frontier-peace set in, after it came to be generally felt

that these had positively abandoned the subjugation of this region.

Even invasions from the far East cannot have materially disturbed it at

this epoch; for they could not but have reacted on the Roman guarding

of the frontier, and we should not have lacked information had more

serious crises occurred in this domain. All this is confirmed by the

reduction of the army of the lower Rhine to half of its former amount,

which occurred we know not exactly when, but within this epoch. The

army of the lower Rhine, with which Vespasian had to fight, numbered

four legions; that of the time of Trajan presumably the same number,

at least three;[71] probably already under Hadrian, certainly under

Marcus, there were not more than two--the 1st Minervian and the 30th of

Trajan--stationed there.

[Sidenote: Upper Germany.]

Germanic affairs in the upper province developed themselves after

another fashion. Of the Germans on the left of the Rhine who belonged

to this province, the Triboci, Nemetes, Vangiones, there is nothing

historically worth mentioning, except that they, for long settled among

the Celts, shared the destinies of Gaul. Here too the Rhine always

remained the chief line of defence for the Romans. All the standing

camps of the legions were at all times on the left bank of the Rhine;

not even that of Argentoratum was transferred to the right bank,

when the whole region of the Neckar was Roman. But while in the lower

province the Roman rule on the right bank of the Rhine was restricted

in course of time, here on the other hand it was extended. The project

of Augustus to connect the camps on the Rhine with those on the Danube

by advancing the imperial frontier in an eastward direction--which,

if it had been carried out, would have enlarged upper more than lower

Germany--was perhaps never completely abandoned in this command, and

was resumed subsequently, though on a more modest scale. Historical

tradition does not give us the means of presenting a connected view

of the operations continued with this object for centuries, the

construction of roads and walls pertaining thereto, and the wars waged

on this account; and even the great military structure still existing,

whose rise and progress--likewise embracing centuries--must include in

itself a good part of that history, has hitherto not been investigated

throughout, as it well might be, by the eyes of military experts. The

hope that unified Germany would combine for the investigation of this

its oldest historical monument, has not been fulfilled. We shall here

attempt to put together what has hitherto been brought to light on

the subject from the fragments of the Roman annals or of the Roman

strongholds.

[Sidenote: Mogontiacum.]

[Sidenote: Mattiaci.]

The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 1 · 第 5 / 13 章