THE SINGLE ECONOMIC PLAN

The widest possible application of the principle of general labor

service, together with measures for the militarization of labor, can

play a decisive part only in case they are applied on the basis of a

single economic plan covering the whole country and all branches of

productive activity. This plan must be drawn up for a number of years,

for the whole epoch that lies before us. It is naturally broken up

into separate periods or stages, corresponding to the inevitable

stages in the economic rebirth of the country. We shall have to begin

with the most simple and at the same time most fundamental problems.

We have first of all to afford the working class the very possibility

of living--though it be in the most difficult conditions--and thereby

to preserve our industrial centres and save the towns. This is the

point of departure. If we do not wish to melt the town into

agriculture, and transform the whole country into a peasant State, we

must support our transport, even at the minimum level, and secure

bread for the towns, fuel and raw materials for industry, fodder for

the cattle. Without this we shall not make one step forward.

Consequently, the first part of the plan comprises the improvement of

transport, or, in any case, the prevention of its further

deterioration and the preparation of the most necessary supplies of

food, raw materials, and fuel. The whole of the next period will be in

its entirety filled with the concentration and straining of

labor-power to solve these root problems; and only in this way shall

we lay the foundations for all that is to come. It was such a problem,

incidentally, that we put before our labor armies. Whether the first

or the following periods will be measured by months or by years, it is

fruitless at present to guess. This depends on many reasons, beginning

with the international situation and ending with the degree of

single-mindedness and steadfastness of the working class.

The second period is the period of machine-building in the interests

of transport and the storage of raw material and fuel. Here the core

is in the locomotive.

At the present time the repairing of locomotives is carried on in too

haphazard a fashion, swallowing up energies and resources beyond all

measure. We must reorganize the repairing of our rolling-stock, on the

basis of the mass production of spare parts. To-day, when the whole

network of the railways and the factories is in the hands of one

master, the Labor State, we can and must fix single types of

locomotives and trucks for the whole country, standardize their

constituent parts, draw all the necessary factories into the work of

the mass production of spare parts, reduce repairing to the simple

replacing of worn-out parts by new, and thereby make it possible to

build new locomotives on a mass scale out of spare parts.

Now that the sources of fuel and raw material are again open to us, we

must concentrate our exclusive attention on the building of

locomotives.

The third period will be one of machine-building in the interests of

the production of articles of primary necessity.

Finally, the fourth period, reposing on the conquests of the first

three, will allow us to begin the production of articles of personal

or secondary significance on the widest possible scale.

This plan has great significance, not only as a general guide for the

practical work of our economic organs, but also as a line along which

propaganda amongst the laboring masses in connection with our economic

problems is to proceed. Our labor mobilization will not enter into

real life, will not take root, if we do not excite the living interest

of all that is honest, class-conscious, and inspired in the working

class. We must explain to the masses the whole truth as to our

situation and as to our views for the future; we must tell them openly

that our economic plan, with the maximum of exertion on the part of

the workers, will neither to-morrow nor the day after give us a land

flowing with milk and honey: for during the first period our chief

work will consist in preparing the conditions for the production of

the means of production. Only after we have secured, though on the

smallest possible scale, the possibility of rebuilding the means of

transport and production, shall we pass on to the production of

articles for general consumption. In this way the fruit of their

labor, which is the direct object of the workers, in the shape of

articles for personal consumption, will arrive only in the last, the

fourth, stage of our economic plan; and only then shall we have a

serious improvement in our life. The masses, who for a prolonged

period will still bear all the weight of labor and of privation, must

realize to the full the inevitable internal logic of this economic

plan if they are to prove capable of carrying it out.

The sequence of the four economic periods outlined above must not be

understood too absolutely. We do not, of course, propose to bring

completely to a standstill our textile industry: we could not do this

for military considerations alone. But in order that our attention and

our forces should not be distracted under the pressure of requirements

and needs crying to us from all quarters, it is essential to make use

of the economic plan as the fundamental criterion, and separate the

important and the fundamental from the auxiliary and secondary.

Needless to say, under no circumstances are we striving for a narrow

"national" Communism: the raising of the blockade, and the European

revolution all the more, would introduce the most radical alterations

in our economic plan, cutting down the stages of its development and

bringing them together. But we do not know when these events will take

place; and we must act in such a way that we can hold out and become

stronger under the most unfavorable circumstances--that is to say, in

face of the slowest conceivable development of the European and the

world revolution. In case we are able actually to establish trading

relations with the capitalist countries, we shall again be guided by

the economic plan sketched above. We shall exchange part of our raw

material for locomotives or for necessary machines, but under no

circumstances for clothing, boots, or colonial products: our first

item is not articles of consumption, but the implements of transport

and production.

We should be short-sighted sceptics, and the most typical bourgeois

curmudgeons, if we imagined that the rebirth of our economic life will

take the form of a gradual transition from the present economic

collapse to the conditions that preceded that collapse, _i.e._,

that we shall reascend the same steps by which we descended, and only

after a certain, quite prolonged, period will be able to raise our

Socialist economy to the level at which it stood on the eve of the

imperialist war. Such a conception would not only be not consoling,

but absolutely incorrect. Economic collapse, which destroyed and broke

up in its path an incalculable quantity of values, also destroyed a

great deal that was poor and rotten, that was absolutely senseless;

and thereby it cleared the path for a new method of reconstruction,

corresponding to that technical equipment which world economy now

possesses.

If Russian capitalism developed not from stage to stage, but leaping

over a series of stages, and instituted American factories in the

midst of primitive steppes, the more is such a forced march possible

for Socialist economy. After we have conquered our terrible misery,

have accumulated small supplies of raw material and food, and have

improved our transport, we shall be able to leap over a whole series

of intermediate stages, benefiting by the fact that we are not bound

by the chains of private property, and that therefore we are able to

subordinate all undertakings and all the elements of economic life to

a single State plan.

Thus, for example, we shall undoubtedly be able to enter the period of

electrification, in all the chief branches of industry and in the

sphere of personal consumption, without passing through "the age of

steam." The programme of electrification is already drawn up in a

series of logically consequent stages, corresponding to the

fundamental stages of the general economic plan.

A new war may slow down the realization of our economic intentions;

our energy and persistence can and must hasten the process of our

economic rebirth. But, whatever be the rate at which economic events

unfold themselves in the future, it is clear that at the foundation of

all our work--labor mobilization, militarization of labor, Subbotniks,

and other forms of Communist labor voluntarism--there must lie the

_single economic plan_. And the period that is upon us requires from

us the complete concentration of all our energies on the first

elementary problems: food, fuel, raw material, transport. _Not to

allow our attention to be distracted, not to dissipate our forces, not

to waste our energies._ Such is the sole road to salvation.

Dictatorship vs. Democracy (Terrorism and Communism): a reply to Karl Kantsky · 第 51 / 57 题