LUNA, situated on the sea-coast, in the neighbourhood of the modern

Carrara, was anciently likewise Etruscan, and of importance to Rome

on account of its excellent harbour. The whole coast of Etruria has

but few harbours, and there is only one other at Populonia; but that

of Luna had the advantage of being at once the nearest and very good.

Before the Romans had formed a communication with Spain by land, the

military communication with that country was kept up by means of the port

of Luna; and the Romans had long been masters of the greater part of

Spain, before the communication through Gaul was opened. Luna was also

important on account of its quarries of white marble, called _marmor

Lunense_. The Romans did not commence to work in marble till a very late

period: before the time of Augustus it was not very extensively used,

and he first erected buildings of native marble. During Cicero’s youth

the Romans began to employ Carystian and Numidian (yellow) marble in

private houses, no doubt, for small pillars; and in the time of Pompey,

the use of foreign marble became a little more common. But in the reign

of Augustus it became very general, whence marbles of every kind are

found in the ruins; Carrara marble was employed in vast quantities, the

white Pentelian was less common. After the time of Augustus, it was

customary to use bricks for the internal parts of walls, and to cover

or incrustate, as the Italians say, the outside with slabs of marble.

At a later period of the empire this custom extended so far, that it

became an indispensable luxury to cover the walls even of private houses

with most costly kinds of marble. The temple of Apollo on the Palatine

seems to have been constructed of solid Carrara marble. When the Romans

advanced as far as Luna, the Etruscans were, probably, no longer masters

of the place, but it seems to have belonged to the Ligurians. In the

middle ages it was destroyed by the Saracens.

PISA also appears to have been Etruscan, but it never was a sovereign

city. It is regarded as a colony of Pisa in Elis (whence _Pisae Alpheae_

in Virgil); but this is a groundless fancy, and it is an undoubted fact

that Pisa was an ancient Tyrrhenian place. In the Hannibalian war,

it was an important military station to the Romans, who succeeded in

remaining masters of it. Afterwards it became a military colony. The

great importance of the place is manifest from the number of ruins and

remains of every description, although the town is not often spoken of.

In the middle ages it rose rapidly and became great at once, just as the

gods in the Aeneid step forth from the clouds, without any one having

anticipated them. In the eleventh century, when the Pisans constructed

their cathedral with its baptistery and tower, Pisa must have been a city

of gigantic power and greatness. Its inhabitants possessed a wonderful

taste for the arts even during the darkest periods of the middle ages,

when at Venice (I will not mention Rome which was quite barbarous) not

the slightest trace of such a taste was perceptible. The Venetians, as

late as the thirteenth century, melted down all the Greek works of art

in bronze which they could carry away; the preservation of the colossal

horses from Chios, in the Piazza S. Marco, is almost a mere accident: the

strange deliberation as to whether they should be melted down or not, is

well known. For half a century afterwards the horses stood neglected in

some shed, until civilisation advanced, and they were set up in their

present place. At Pisa, on the other hand, the taste for the arts was so

far developed that, as early as the eleventh century, the city employed

an architect, probably from the south of France (his name is Bruschetti,

as is stated in the excellent inscriptions), to build a church, which is

as magnificent as any structure belonging to the period of the emperors

of declining Rome, or of the Byzantine rulers. The Pisans, moreover,

carefully collected during their expeditions, especially at Rome, columns

and other antiquities, and obtained similar treasures as presents from

the emperors. During the twelfth century they collected fragments of

ancient architecture, sculptures, and especially sarcophagi which they

put together in their cemetery (Campo Santo); they then surrounded the

cemetery with a wall and a portico, and thus affectionately preserved

the remains of antiquity. The bodies of men of rank were buried in these

sarcophagi. Such was the spirit in which Nicolo Pisano, a gigantic

genius of the middle of the thirteenth century, made bas-reliefs more

beautiful than any that were produced at Rome during the third century

of our era; not only does he show great genius in invention, but also in

the beauty of his sculptures. The civic laws of the Pisans were based

upon remnants of the Roman law, nay, edicts of praetors, which had not

been introduced into the Justinianean Code, were preserved there; so

that Pisa, at a later period, remained an essentially Roman city, though

it was governed by a Lombard nobility. The vicissitudes of Pisa were

terrible and deplorable. The Genoese overpowered and cruelly destroyed

it: the more bravely and valiantly the city resisted, the more fearful

was its destruction. Afterwards it was subdued by the Florentines. No

republic ever carried the persecution of its subjects so far as Florence

carried that of the Pisans. The Florentines distrusted them so much, that

the Pisans were not only excluded from all honourable offices, but were

not allowed even within their own city to practise certain professions

or engage in certain trades; they were not allowed, e.g., to embrace

the professions of physicians and lawyers, or to carry on a wholesale

mercantile business, but they were limited to the small and common

trades. The consequence of this was an insurrection, but the Pisans

were subdued, and of the 100,000 inhabitants which Pisa had had during

the middle ages, not more than 8,000 remained at the time when Cosmo de

Medici entered upon the government. Athens was in a similar state of

decay during the period from Alexander to the last Philip of Macedonia.

VOLATERRAE, no doubt one of the ancient sovereign cities, was situated

at some distance from the coast. In the history of the Roman wars, it

acted a very prominent part; and from the vigorous manner in which it

supported Scipio, we see what a powerful place it must have been; but

it distinguished itself more especially by the resistance it offered

to Sulla. When the fate of the whole Marian party was already decided,

Volaterrae still sustained a war for two years, and did not surrender

until it was compelled by want of provisions. We do not know what was

the fate of the town, but we do know the character of the conqueror, and

may therefore presume that it was a most fearful one. Sulla established

a military colony there, and deprived the inhabitants of the franchise.

The ancient circumference of the city can still be distinctly traced:

it occupied all the surface of a very considerable hill, which rises

above the lower hills of an almost level and beautiful country. The wall

clearly shows the difference between the Pelasgo-Cyclopean and the more

artistic Etruscan mode of fortification. The Etruscan fortifications

were constructed along the upper edge of a hill as real walls, and the

sides of the hill below the walls were not cut precipitous; the Pelasgian

places, on the other hand, have no walls on the edge of the hills, but

the sides of the rock are cut down so as to be precipitous, and are

provided with substructions. Another difference consists in the fact,

that the Etruscan walls are built of regular square blocks, forming

parallelograms one perpendicularly above the other. The blocks are very

large, and generally put together without cement, their edges being cut

very sharp. The fortifications of Volaterrae are among the most perfect.

After the time of Sulla, or at least after that of Augustus, Volaterrae

was a military colony. It was the birth-place of the poet Persius, who

for this reason more than once alludes to the circumstances of his native

place, and can be understood only by those who are acquainted with them.

The hill on which Volaterrae stood, consists of alabaster, in consequence

of which many works in that material were executed there; hence the

sarcophagi of Volaterrae with Etruscan inscriptions, are made of

alabaster. During the middle ages the town was still very considerable;

but it has decayed, especially through the greatness of Florence.

The next place after Volaterrae in the south is POPULONIA, POPULONII or

POPULONIUM, for all these forms occur. On Etruscan coins it is called

_Puplana_, for the Etruscan alphabet has no _o_ nor any short vowels.

There is a statement which seems quite credible that Populonia was a

colony of Volaterrae. In later times it was one of the more important

Etruscan towns, and acted a prominent part in the wars against Rome,

of which an account is given in the tenth book of Livy. It had the

sovereignty of the neighbouring island of _Ilva_ or _Aethalia_, a Greek

name suggestive of its Pelasgian origin. The mountain of this island

consists of large masses of iron, which by the Catalanian method can

easily be transformed into the most excellent steel. The west of Europe

was, to a great extent, provided with iron from Elba, as it was imported

into the eastern parts from the Black Sea. The working of the mines of

Elba, however, seems to be of a more recent date than the composition of

the Odyssey, for in this poem the south of Italy is provided with iron

from Temese. The ancients notice it as a singular phenomenon, that the

iron could not be smelted in Elba, and that it was necessary to do this

on the continent; but this is a Greek absurdity, and an inability to

comprehend things connected with ordinary life, which we not unfrequently

meet with in the ancients. It was reported in Greece, that it was

necessary to transport the iron to Populonia, and the imagination of

the Greeks immediately invented a reason. The truth is simply this: in

later times there was a want of wood in Elba, and it was found cheaper

to convey the iron to Populonia, than to import wood into Elba, for

Populonia possessed smelting establishments. In like manner, the copper

ore found in Cornwall is conveyed to Wales and smelted there. Populonia

was a wealthy maritime town until it was destroyed by Sulla; and from

that time it has been a heap of ruins, which were seen by Strabo. The

town was never restored.

The moderns who have written on ancient geography are tolerably unanimous

in their opinions, that VETULONIUM was situated in the neighbourhood

of Populonia. Dionysius mentions it as a large city, which carried on

war against Rome, while Livy does not notice it either in the first

decad, where he describes the great Etruscan war, or in his account of

the Hannibalian war, or in any other place. It must accordingly have

disappeared at a time of which we know nothing. There exist coins with

Etruscan inscriptions, which unquestionably belong to Vetulonium. In a

forest near Populonia large ruins are found, which have been assigned

to Vetulonium, but this is a mere conjecture, and nothing can be said

with any degree of certainty about the situation of the place. I have

often thought, that it might possibly be Orviedo which was called _Urbs

vetus_ as early as the eighth century. However, the place has entirely

disappeared, and all that is said about it rests on mere conjecture.

There now follow RUSELLAE and COSSA, the latter of which, as I have

already observed, was probably not an Etruscan town; at a later time it

received a Latin colony.

TARQUINII appears in our histories as an Etruscan town, but that in the

most ancient times it was a real Tyrrhenian place, is attested by the

tradition of its having been founded by Thessalians; the name Tarchon,

which is mentioned as archegetes and is connected with Telephus, points

in the same direction. At the time when Tarquinii is drawn into the

traditions about Rome, and connected with Tarquinius Priscus, it probably

is still a Tyrrhenian town. In the war with Pyrrhus, Tarquinii, like

nearly all the Etruscan towns, formed an alliance with Rome in a general

peace, of which I shall speak in the third volume of my History of Rome.

By this peace the Etruscan towns were placed in a relation to Rome quite

different from that of the other towns of Italy, because the Romans

were anxious to gratify their wishes in order to prevent their forming

connections with Pyrrhus. This is one of the occurrences where Providence

directly interferes in the affairs of the world for the purpose of saving

a state from destruction. Such also was the peace between Russia and

Turkey in 1812, whereby the French army was prevented from retreating

to Turkey, and was thus left to its fate. In like manner, Soltikoff,

after the battle of Kunersdorf, ordered his troops to stand still. The

determination of the Etruscan towns to accept the peace of the Romans

forms a similar turning point in ancient history. After this, Tarquinii

remained faithful to Rome, until it disappeared in the time of the

Roman emperors. In the age of Cicero it still existed; in the war of

Sulla it was probably not destroyed, though severe sufferings may have

been inflicted upon it. The site which it once occupied, the modern

Corneto, is remarkable for the monuments which are discovered there,

and are more numerous than in any other place of Etruria. They are made

of clay, and are of a very peculiar character, approaching the Grecian

style, while those found in the interior of Etruria are altogether

different in workmanship from Greek monuments. The decay of Tarquinii

must perhaps be ascribed to the choking up of its good harbour, and to

the rise of _Centumcellae_, one of the few places in Italy the origin

of which belongs to a late period. Until the time of Trajan no town

existed there; it was only a summer palace of the emperor with a mineral

spring, for that volcanic region contains many hot springs. Trajan, who

in general did much to promote the navigation of the Italians, built a

harbour there, and constructed the _molo_ which still forms the harbour

of Civita Vecchia; and near it arose the town which received its name of

Centumcellae from the imperial palace. The town continued to increase

in importance, especially during the period of the decay of the empire,

when the Portus of Rome became more and more filled up, while that of

Centumcellae was capable of receiving larger ships. The Saracens took

the place, but the inhabitants withdrew, and built in the interior of

the country the town of _Leopolis_, named after pope Leo IV. When, in

consequence of the victory of Ostia, the danger of the Saracens was

removed, the inhabitants of Centumcellae returned, and from that time the

town has been called _Civita Vecchia_. It is, therefore, not an Etruscan,

but a Roman town.

CAERE with the port towns of _Fregenae_, _Alsium_, and _Pyrgi_, was

situated nearer the mouth of the Tiber. Caere was anciently called

_Agylla_, and as such it is said to have been Pelasgian or Thessalian:

it is, moreover, expressly mentioned that the town was taken by the

Etruscans. As later writers believed in the Lydian origin of the

Etruscans, this misunderstanding gave rise to the account that Agylla

was taken by the Lydians. Agylla existed as a Tyrrhenian town until

a very late period. In the account of Herodotus, where the Phocaeans

settle in Corsica, and are attacked and expelled by the Carthaginians

and Agyllaeans, Agylla does not yet appear as an Etruscan town. When the

Agyllaeans, after treating their captives treacherously, had experienced

the wrath of heaven, they consulted the oracle of Apollo at Delphi,

which no Etruscan town ever did; they, moreover had a _thesaurus_ at

Delphi, and the mention of _thesauri_ there does not go farther back

than the fortieth Olympiad. It must therefore have been after this time

that the Etruscans advanced into those districts. The names of Pyrgi

and Alsium also attest their Tyrrhenian origin. It is probable, lastly,

that Caere, because of its Tyrrhenian origin, was on such friendly terms

with Rome, that during the Gallic calamity the Romans carried their

sacred treasures in safety to Caere. Afterwards they were involved in a

protracted war with each other; a truce was concluded and renewed from

time to time, until Caere gradually entered the general relation in which

the Etruscan towns stood to Rome. In this condition, we find Caere in the

time of the Hannibalian war. Afterwards it is no longer mentioned, except

that we find it entered as a Marian colony in the lists of colonies drawn

up by Hyginus and Frontinus.

VEII was situated not quite ten English miles from Rome. Its

circumference, according to Dionysius, was like that of Rome under

Servius Tullius, and the same as the ancient Attic ἄστυ. However, it is

scarcely credible that Dionysius should have possessed such accurate

information about a town which had been razed to the ground long before

his own time. It is well known, that Veii was destroyed by the Romans

even before the Gallic period, because the plebeians had declared that

they would emigrate to Veii, if the patricians thought them unworthy of

being members of the same state. For this reason, the patricians and the

senate systematically destroyed the place. Its site is undoubted, but

scarcely any traces of Etruscan remains are found there. In the reign

of Tiberius, we find it mentioned as a military colony, but we do not

know when or how it was constituted as such. About thirty years ago,

excavations were made on the spot, and some beautiful works of art, and

among them a very fine statue of Tiberius, were discovered; but most of

the things found there are not above mediocrity, and all the inscriptions

refer to the restoration of the place by Tiberius. Henceforth, and down

to the overthrow of the western empire, Veii remained a small country

town in the neighbourhood of the capital. A bishop of Veii occurs as late

as the fifth century. It is quite in accordance with the natural course

of things, that places which were great before Rome rose to eminence,

and for a time her equals, were in the end subdued and perished in the

wars with their rival. In places of this kind a new population gradually

sprang up, and corporations were formed which were nothing else but

military colonies, and could not last long, as most of the men were

unmarried. Such a population was generally of the worst kind, consisting

of inn-keepers, carters, and the like; the places were in reality suburbs

of Rome, though at a considerable distance from it.

CAPENA was about the same distance from Rome as Veii; it is mentioned

in the earlier times, but afterwards completely disappears, and its

inhabitants, according to all appearances, were removed to Rome after the

Punic war. SUTRIUM and NEPET were for a long time the frontier towns of

Etruria towards the territory of Rome.

VULSINII, situated on lake Bolsena, was one of the largest Etruscan

towns. When after the Gallic war we find Etruria in arms, we must suppose

that the Vulsinians were the soul of those undertakings. They were

involved in hostilities with Rome even before the Gallic war; afterwards

they are, for a time, not mentioned at all, whence their relations with

Rome seem to have ceased; the frontier heights between Rome and Etruria

were allowed to grow wild and to become covered with an impenetrable

forest, as has been the case in modern times in the neighbourhood of

Licca, on the frontier between Croatia and Turkish Bosnia. This is the

_Ciminian forest_, the description of which in Livy is exaggerated in

a ridiculous manner; it often happens that his great imaginative power

leads him to make descriptions which would be excellent in a novel,

but are ludicrous in a work where truth is the object. The history of

Vulsinii is remarkable both for its facts and for its fables. It is a

fact that ever since A.U. 440, and for a period of thirty years, Vulsinii

offered a resistance to the Romans, which larger Etruscan towns recoiled

from, and that at length Rome, in the height of her power, when she was

the mistress of Italy, with difficulty conquered and then destroyed it.

In later times it re-appears, for Sejanus was a native of Vulsinii.

Metrodorus of Scepsis says that the real cause of the destruction of

Vulsinii was the circumstance that the Romans wanted to obtain possession

of 2000 magnificent statues which existed there. This is a fable, and no

doubt the view of a Greek, which he attributed to the Romans. The latter

were far from attaching such value to works of art; gold and silver were

the things they sought after. The real reason was that Vulsinii, by its

thirty years’ resistance, had distinguished itself above all Etruscan

tribes; and the Romans, therefore, were determined to take the sap

out of the tree, so as to prevent its ever growing again. The ancient

inhabitants had called in the Romans against their slaves. These slaves,

however, must not be understood to have been domestic slaves, but serfs,

or the subdued ancient population, whom elsewhere the Etruscan magnates

kept in servitude, while the Vulsinians had given them freedom and the

franchise. The commonalty, having thus become free, did not stop short

there, but, indignant at the ancient wrong done to them, they attacked

their former tyrants; they did not, however, expel, but only weakened

them. The latter then applied to Rome, and preferred having their town

destroyed to living on a footing of equality with the commonalty. The

correct spelling of the name is _Vulsinii_ and not _Volsinii_, for,

as I have already mentioned, the Etruscans had no _o_; hence we find

_Vulsinii_ in the Capitoline Fasti, though in genuine Roman words it is

more correct to write _o_ after _v_, as _volnus_ and not _vulnus_.

In the centre of Etruria there was no ruling city, nay, no Etruscan place

at all. Augustus established there _Sena Julia_ as a military colony,

the sixth legion being stationed there. As there was no road through the

centre of the country, but only one along the coast, and another through

the eastern part, Augustus made the one running by Aquapendente.

The Etruscan towns in the eastern part of the country were Clusium,

Perusia, Cortona (though its Etruscan character is doubtful), Arretium,

and Faesulae.

The greatness of CLUSIUM belongs to the most ancient times, for in Roman

history it is not of any importance; nor do the Romans mention any ruins

of Clusium, for all that is related of the buildings of Porsena, belongs

to the domain of fable.

PERUSIA was situated east of Clusium. During the period described in

the ninth and tenth books of Livy, Perusia acts the same part as the

other Etruscan towns; but after having suffered a defeat, it concluded

a truce. The Perusines undertook the war in a foolish manner, and

the first reverse discouraged them. Here, too, a military colony was

afterwards established, probably by Sulla. The town is remarkable in

history for the obstinate resistance it offered to Augustus, as in fact

the descendants of Sulla’s soldiers in the military colonies were almost

everywhere opposed to the party of Caesar. The town was taken and the

most illustrious citizens put to death, or rather butchered, at the altar

of Julius Caesar. Afterwards a new military colony was sent thither under

the name of _Colonia Julia Augusta Perusina_.

CORTONA, also a military colony, probably likewise founded by Sulla, was

situated on a very high hill and in a very strong position. Its ancient

walls do not appear to have been particularly strong.

Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) · 第 18 / 32 段