COMMENTARY. Waiving disputed points regarding the ancient Mandragora,

we shall merely mention in this place that we believe the _M. Mas_ of

Dioscorides to have been _Mandragoras vernalis_, Bertolin, and the M.

Femina _M. autumnalis_. The ancient authors make frequent mention of its

narcotic and soporific powers. Celsus directs its apples to be placed

below the patient’s pillow in cases of obstinate insomnolency. (iii, 18.)

Dioscorides, in like manner, says, its apples are narcotic when smelled

to, and also their juice; that if persisted in, they will deprive the

person of his speech. He mentions mandrake as an ingredient in anodyne

collyria and pessaries, and says that in an enema it induces sleep.

He recommends the wine of mandragora to be given to patients before

they are subjected to the operation of cutting or burning. He gives

minute directions for making the various preparations of mandragora. He

concludes his chapter on it by giving from information an account of

another species of mandragora, called morion, which he represents as

being powerfully narcotic; and hence as being administered by medical men

when about to operate by cutting or burning. This plant we agree with

Dodonæus and Cordus in thinking must have been the M. of Theophrastus,

namely, the _Atropa Belladonna_. Considering the diligence of the ancient

herbalists, it is not likely that they should have wholly overlooked so

prominent and important an article as the _Belladonna_. The objections

stated to this opinion by Parkinson (Theatre of Plants, 344) do not

appear to us of much force. The account of mandragora given by Pliny is

mostly taken from Dioscorides. (H. N. xxv, 94.) Our author and Aëtius

borrow almost word for word from Galen. Isidorus says of it, “Cujus

cortex vino mixtus ad bibendum iis datur quorum corpus propter curam

secandum est, ut soporati dolorem non sentiant.” Serapion in like manner

describes it as a powerful narcotic, and says that it was administered

before the performance of amputation to diminish sensibility. (c. 333.)

Avicenna particularly commends the narcotic and soporific powers of

this medicine. He says that it exerts its action in a suppository. The

milky juice of it, he adds, evacuates phlegm and yellow bile. He states

that if a young person, by mistake, partake of its berries, they bring

on vomiting, purging, and perhaps death. The seed mixed with sulphur

vivum, is said by him to stop menorrhagia. Like Dioscorides, he says,

that mandrake evacuates the stomach and bowels like hellebore. (ii, 2,

357.) Averrhoes briefly says of its apples, that they are soporific, and

that its bark is desiccative, but its root weaker. (v. 42.) See also

Rhases (Cont. l. ult. i, 446.) Servitor describes both a concrete and an

expressed juice of mandragora. The former, which he calls lachryma, he

says could not be procured everywhere. Even the non-professional writers

allude to its soporific powers. Thus Lucian speaks of ὕπο μαδραγόρας

καθεύδειν. (Timon.) Pollux says that it produces heaviness of the head,

that is to say, stupor. Our old herbalists, Turner, Gerard, Parkinson,

and Culpeper, mention the soporific powers of the mandrake, but in such

a way as implies that they had not much practical acquaintance with

it. By the days of Boerhaave and Quincy, its internal use had been

abandoned, both in this country and on the continent. Although it has

now disappeared from our Dispensatories, we see no good reason why its

well-regulated use might not be revived. That the ancients have described

its operation on the animal economy correctly, is admitted by our latest

writers on Toxicology and the Materia Medica. See the works of Orfila,

Christison, and Pereira. In conclusion it may be proper to state, that

the modern Arabians and Persians still use the mandragora as a narcotic

and antispasmodic. See Ainslie (Mat. Ind. i, 1, 116.) It is not contained

in the Greek Pharmacopœia of the present day.

Μάννα λιβάνου,

Manna Thuris, has similar powers to frankincense, but enfeebled and

gently astringent.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Gesner says of it, “Manna thuris est fragmina minora corticis

ramentis permista.” (Lexicon Rusticum.) Dr. Hill calls it the fragments

of the cluster frankincense broke off in the carriage. It is singular

that the Greek and Roman writers make no mention of the manna now in

use, namely, the concrete juice of the _Fraxinus Ornus_. Actuarius had,

no doubt, learned the use of it from the Arabians. (Meth. M. v, 8.)

We will treat of the true manna more properly in the Appendix to this

section, among the medicinal substances introduced by the Arabians.

Μάραθρον,

Fœniculum, _Fennel_, is heating in the third degree, but desiccative in

the first; it therefore forms milk and relieves suffusions of the eye.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Dioscorides gives a fuller exposition of the medicinal

properties of this substance (_Anethum Fœniculum_) than any of the other

authorities on the Mat. Med., representing it as being possessed of

powers to promote the secretion of milk; as being useful in complaints

of the kidneys and bladder as a diuretic, and in those of the uterus as

an emmenagogue; as being alexipharmic, and as a suitable application to

the bites of mad dogs; and an excellent ingredient in collyria, and more

especially the gum of it, which is produced on the plant in Spain. (iii,

74.) Galen, in the main, gives it the same characters, holding it to be

diuretic, emmenagogue, and a suitable ingredient in collyria. Aëtius

and our author follow Galen. It occurs frequently in the Hippocratic

treatises. (551, &c. ed. Foës.) Celsus ranks it among his diuretics (ii,

31), and among the articles which at the same time repress and mollify

(ii, 33.) The Arabians treat fully of the fennel in nearly the same terms

as the Greeks. See Avicenna (ii, 2, 274); Serapion (c. 324); Averrhoes

(Collig. v, 42); Rhases (Cont. l. ult. i, 293.) They all represent it as

being diuretic, emmenagogue, alexipharmic, and an excellent application

in diseases of the eyes. They quote Democritus (?) as stating that vipers

and other venomous creatures rub their eyes upon fennel to improve their

sight. This species of fennel, namely, the _Fœniculum vulgare_, is not

now employed as a medicine in this country. The other species, _Fœniculum

dulce_, or Sweet Fennel, although Matthiolus takes it for the ancient

_Marathron_, would seem to have been unknown to the ancients. The former

species, however, held a place in our Dispensatory down to a recent

period. See Quincy (77.) It still holds a place in the modern Greek

Pharmacopœia (68.)

Μαστίχη,

Mastiche, _Mastich_; the Chian is heating and dessicant in the second

degree; but it is possessed of complicated powers, being at the same

time astringent and emollient; hence it agrees with inflammations of

the œsophagus and stomach, and those of the intestines and liver; but

the Egyptian, being darker, is more desiccant and discutient, and less

astringent; wherefore it discusses furunculi.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Mastich is correctly described as the resin of the lentiscus

by Dioscorides (i, 90), and Pliny (H. N. xxiv, 28.) Both mention that

it is used in the formation of agglutinative plasters for the cure of

trichiasis. Serapion joins the Greek authorities in recommending it for

hæmoptysis. Its use in medicine is as old as the time of Hippocrates. The

“resina ex lentisco” is an ingredient in one of the discutient plasters

recommended by Celsus for the cure of phymata. (v, 18, 22.) Honain, one

of Serapion’s authorities, recommends it in inflammations of the stomach,

and in cough. Another of them says of it, that when mixed with aloes it

forms a good masticatory. (c. 183.)

Μέλαν,

Atramentum; the Indian, as Dioscorides says, is of the class of slightly

refrigerating medicines, and of those which occasion the rupture of

phlegmons and swellings, and cleanse ulcers.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Dioscorides describes two distinct substances by the name

of Ἰνδικόν. The one is the vegetable pigment, still called Indigo; the

other was probably a red mineral of copper, some variety, we suppose,

of the mineral called “tetrahedral red copper ore” by Jameson, or “red

oxide of copper” of Philips. Dioscorides recommends it in much the same

cases as our author. (v, 107.) The other Greek authorities scarcely treat

of it. Our author seems evidently to refer to Indian ink. The Arabians

confound together the dye-producing plants, and accordingly treat of

the woad (Isatis tinctoria) along with the plant which produces indigo.

See Serapion (c. 47), and under _Isatis_ in this section. Averrhoes’s

description is very indistinct, so that it is difficult to know what to

make of his _Indicum_. (Collig. v, 42.) Avicenna in one place alludes to

the mineral pinguent of our author, which he calls Tinctura Inda. (ii, 2,

689.) We beg to refer our readers to Beckmann’s ‘History of Inventions’

for much curious information under the head of _Indigo_.

Μελαντηρία,

Atramentum metallicum, is powerfully astringent with subtilty of parts.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Dioscorides gives a pretty circumstantial description of

three or four varieties of it, and yet none of them can be recognized

with any degree of certainty. One thing only is certain, that they must

all have contained more or less of copper, being found in mines of

copper. As far as we can judge, the mineral named “ferruginous arseniate

of copper” by Cleaveland, is the most likely to be the melanteria of

Dioscorides. He says it has the same caustic powers as misy. (v, 117.)

Galen calls it only powerfully astringent and of subtile parts; and hence

Sprengel inclines to set down his melanteria as being different from that

of Dioscorides; but between the action of a strong astringent and a weak

caustic, the distinction is not great. In describing the melanteria,

Aëtius follows Galen, and Oribasius Dioscorides. There is no mention of

it in the works of Hippocrates, Celsus, and Pliny. The Arabians confuse

their description of it by mixing together those of misy, chalcitis, and

sori along with it, under the head of _Atramentum sutorium_. See Avicenna

(ii, 2, 47.) Serapion also fails to give any distinct account of it. (De

Miner.)

Μέλαν ᾧ γράφομεν,

Atramentum scriptorium, _Writing Ink_; this, too, is decidedly desiccant;

but when dissolved in oxycrate and rubbed in, it straightway relieves

burns.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. _Writing Ink._ Dioscorides describes the composition of

two different kinds of ink; the former consisting of the soot of pines

with gum, and the other containing the soot of rosin, bull’s glue, and

copperas. For a fuller account of the inks used by the ancients, see

Pliny (H. N. xxxv, 6), Oribasius (Med. Collect, xiii), Isidorus (Orig.

xix), and Montfauçon (Palæog. Græca, c. i.) Dioscorides says of it that

it is adapted to the healing of putrid ulcers and burns, when rubbed in

thick with water and allowed to remain, until cicatrization takes place;

for, he adds, when the application falls off the ulcers are healed. (v,

182.) Celsus alludes to the same principle of treating aphthous sores in

the throat, but directs the crusts to be formed with alum, chalcitis, or

the Atramentum sutorium. The Atramentum scriptorium he only notices once,

in describing the operation of trephining the skull. (viii, 4.) Avicenna

alludes also to the practice of Dioscorides. (ii, 2, 689.)

Μελάνθιον,

Nigella sativa, _Gith_, is calefacient and desiccant in the third degree.

It is also distinguished for tenuity of parts; and hence when smelled

to it cures catarrhs, and is most carminative when taken internally. It

is also bitter, and hence it is anthelminthic. It is also detergent and

incisive, and hence it agrees with orthopnœa, cleanses leprosies, ejects

myrmecia, and promotes menstruation.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. It is the _Nigella sativa_, or Gith. Dioscorides, with great

precision, and in his usual empirical style, enumerates all the cases

in which this substance is applicable. As these in the main are the

same as those in which our author recommends it, we need not enter much

into an exposition of the views of Dioscorides on this head. He says

it promotes the secretion of urine, menses, and milk; removes dyspnœa

when drunk with wine; remedies persons stung by venomous spiders; drives

away reptiles, in the form of a fumigation; and that it is reported to

prove fatal when drunk in large quantity. (iii, 83.) Galen explains

its medicinal virtues most scientifically, upon the principles laid

down by him in his preliminary dissertation to the Materia Medica, of

which we have given an exposition in an extract from Aëtius. Gith, he

says, is heating and drying according to the third order, and seems to

be attenuant, _or_ of subtile parts; wherefore it cures catarrhs when

applied hot in a linen cloth, so as to be constantly smelled to. And it

is most carminative, when taken into the body, as is obvious from its

being of subtile parts, and of a substance fine-wrought by the heat,

wherefore, also, it is bitter; for it was shown in the Fourth Book of

these Commentaries, that when a terrene substance arrives at an extreme

tenuity and elaboration, the bitter quality is formed. No wonder,

then, if it proves vermifuge, not only when eaten, but when applied

externally to the belly; for it was formerly shown that a bitter juice

does this. Nor that it removes leprosy, clavus, and myrmecia, need it

seem wonderful to one who remembers what was formerly said. And thus it

relieves orthopnœa, and promotes menstruation, when it is restrained

by the thickness and viscidity of the humours; and, in a word, when we

wish to incide, cleanse, dry, and heat, it is a most useful medicine.

(De Simpl. viii.) Having given so full an exposition of Galen’s views,

we must be brief on those of the other authorities. The gith occurs in

the Mat. Med. of Hippocrates, but is not to be met with in the works of

Celsus. For the Arabians, see Avicenna (ii, 2, 516); Rhases (Cont. l.

ult. i, 496); Serapion (c. 328.) They all follow closely in the footsteps

of Dioscorides and Galen. Though the gith has ceased for some time past

to be used in medicine, it is still sometimes sought after as a spice.

See Gray (Suppl. to Pharmacop. 123.)

Μέλι,

Mel, _Honey_, is heating and desiccant in the second order, and is also

considerably detergent. When boiled it becomes less acrid, detergent and

cathartic, but more nutritious. But bitter honey, like that in Sardonia,

is of mixed powers, being terrene and hot. The _Sacchar_ (Sugar) which is

brought from Araby the Blessed is less sweet than that with us, but is

possessed of equal powers, with the additional advantage of not injuring

the stomach and occasioning thirst like it.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. On the use of honey, see Book I, s. 69. “The honey of reeds”

is mentioned in a fragment of Theophrastus. (ed. Heinsius.) It is

distinctly noticed by Dioscorides (i, 104), Strabo (Geogr. xv), Pliny

(H. N. xii, 17), Galen (Med. Simpl. vii), Oribasius (Med. Collect. xi),

Isidorus (Orig. xvii, 7), Alexander Aphrodisiensis (Probl.), and Symeon

Seth (in voce Sacchar.) It is alluded to by Statius in the following line:

“Et quas præcoquit Æbusita cannas.”—_Silv._ i, 6, 15.

Lucan also mentions it. (Pharsal. iii, 237.) All the Arabian medical

authors, in a word, make frequent mention of it. It is obvious, however,

as is remarked by Harduin, Salmasius, Freind, Millward, and Sprengel,

that the ancient sugar was a concretion formed upon the surface of

reeds by the heat of the sun, and consequently it was different from

the sugar of the moderns, which is formed by boiling. Symeon Seth says

of sugar that it is heating and humid in the first degree, detergent,

and diaphoretic like honey. Mesue recommends it for the composition of

electuaries. Dr. Hill states that although the _Bambu_ be the sugar-cane

with which the ancients were most familiar, it would appear that the

“tenera arundo” of Lucan was rather the common sugar-reed of our times.

Μελία,

Fraxinus, _the Ash_, is a well-known tree, the leaves of which, when

taken in a draught, agree with the bites of vipers. Its bark, when burnt

and rubbed in with water, removes leprosies. The sawdust of the wood when

drunk is said to be deadly.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. There can be no doubt of its being a species of _Fraxinus_,

or perhaps both the _F. Ornus_ and _F. rotundifolia_. Our author’s

account of it is taken literally from Dioscorides. (i, 108.) Avicenna

mentions it as a vulnerary herb, and recommends it in the same cases as

Dioscorides does. (i, 108.)

Μελίλωτον,

Melilotum, _Melilot_, is possessed of mixed powers, being astringent,

discutient, and digestive.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. It is the _Melilotus officinalis_, L. Dioscorides says of

it, that it has some styptic power, and is an emollient of all kinds of

inflammations, especially about the eyes, womb, anus, and testicles, when

boiled with must and applied, or along with albumen of an egg, flour of

fenugreek, &c.; that it cures meliceris when recent, achores, and pain

of the stomach, and earache when injected into the ear, and headache

when used as an embrocation with vinegar and oil of roses. (iii, 41.)

Galen and the other Greek authorities state its application in general

terms like our author. For the Arabians, see Avicenna (ii, 2, 445);

Averrhoes (Collig. v, 42); Rhases (Cont. l. ult. i, 465); Serapion (De

Simpl. 18.) They scarcely suggest any new cases for its administration,

but borrow what they say of its medicinal powers from Dioscorides and

Galen. The melilot was used in medicine, and held a place in our English

Dispensatory even as late as the time of Quincy. (118, 204.)

Μελισσόφυλλον,

Apiastrum, _Baum_; its action is in every respect like that of horehound.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. According to Dioscorides, Baum (_Melissa officinalis_),

when its leaves are taken in a draught with wine, or when applied as a

cataplasm, is alexipharmic in the case of persons stung by scorpions

or venomous spiders, and of those who have been bitten by mad dogs;

the decoction in the form of a fomentation (or effusion) does the

same; it makes a good hip-bath for promoting menstruation; is a gargle

for toothache and a clyster for dysentery; its leaves, in a draught,

cure those who have taken poisonous mushrooms, and those suffering

from tormina; it forms a linctus in orthopnœa, and along with salts a

discutient application to scrofula and ulcers; and as a cataplasm it

soothes pains of the joints. (iii, 108.) Our author borrows from Galen,

who, like him, gives its characters in general terms. Aëtius, under this

head, copies from Galen, and Oribasius from Dioscorides. We believe it is

not to be found either in the works of Hippocrates, or those of Celsus.

Serapion gives a full account of it, first quoting from Dioscorides and

Galen, and then from Abenmesuai and Isaak ebn Amran; the former of whom

says it is exhilarating, and the other that it is useful in a cold and

humid intemperament of the stomach, promotes digestion, proves cordial,

&c. (c. 23.)

Μεμάικυλος,

Memæcylus, being the _Fruit of the Arbute_, has been treated of under the

letter Κ.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. It is, as here stated, the fruit of the wild

_Strawberry-tree_, that is to say of the _Arbutus Unedo_, L.

Μέσπιλα,

Mespila, _Medlars_ (called also Tricocca); their fruit being decidedly

sour and scarcely edible, proves astringent of the bowels: and its shoots

and leaves are also decidedly sour.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Dioscorides describes the two species of Medlar in such

distinct terms as leaves no doubt that they are the _Mespilus Azarolus_

and _Germanica_. He represents their fruit as being esculent and slightly

astringent. (i, 169, 170.) Galen says of the medlar, that it is acid and

austere, and barely esculent, and that it restrains fluxes. (De Simpl.

vii.) The other Greek and Arabian authorities give the same account of

it. See in particular, Avicenna (ii, 2, 742) and Ebn Baithar (i, 532.)

The Arabians prepared an ointment from it for making the hair black and

curled. Casiri (Bibl. Arab. Hisp. 330.) The term _azarolus_ is borrowed

from the Arabic. See Avicenna (l. c.)

Μήδιον,

Medium; the powers of the root are contrary to those of the fruit, for

the former is austere and astringent of fluxes, so as to restrain the

female fluor. But the seed even promotes menstruation, being possessed of

attenuating and incisive powers.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. The description of this article given by Dioscorides is

sufficiently precise to decide its belonging to the genus _Campanula_. It

was at one time generally referred to the species called _Medium_, but,

as Sprengel remarks, the appearance of the leaves does not agree with

those of the _medium_. Sibthorp, therefore, in his ‘Flora Græca,’ has

decided that it is the _C. laciniata_. (i, 141.) Dioscorides and Galen

agree in giving it the same medicinal powers as our author. We are at

a loss to determine whether or not it occurs in the Materia Medica of

the Arabians, with the exception of Ebn Baithar, who merely gives the

descriptions of it by Dioscorides and Galen. (ii, 541.)

Μήκωνες,

Papavera, _Poppies_; there are several species, but of the garden poppy,

which they call _Thylacitis_, the seed is edible, and when eaten with

bread is moderately soporific. That species which is called _Rhæas_,

because its seed soon falls off, is stronger than the garden. It is

therefore not eaten by itself, but a small quantity of it is mixed with

much honey. That which has a sessile head has seeds which are black and

strongly medicinal, being considerably cold. That the top of which is

longer and more contracted, is the most strongly medicinal of all, so

as to induce torpor even to mortification. For it and its juice, which

is called, _per excellentiam_, opium, belong to the fourth order of

congealing medicines. But that variety which is called _Cornutum_ is

possessed of detergent powers, so that the decoction of it when drunk is

serviceable in hepatic complaints. Its leaves and flowers cleanse foul

ulcers and remove eschars. That species which is called _Heraclium_ and

_Spumosum_, has seeds which purge phlegm.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. In the Fifth Book we have treated fully of the different

species of poppy known to the ancients. See also Schulze (Toxicol. Vet.)

The _Rhæas_ would seem to be the _Papaver dubium_, the _sativum_ is the

_P. Rhæas_. The Papaver cornutum appears to be the _Glaucium luteum_,

Scop. The _P. spumeum_ may be the _Gratiola officinalis_, Angl. Hedge

Hyssop. The ancients distinguished two kinds of the inspissated juice of

the poppy: the one was the juice obtained by wounding the poppy-heads,

and was called μήκωνος ὄπος, and ὄπιον; the other was an expressed juice,

much weaker than this, called μηκώνιον. The second sort is not known at

present. We will treat more fully of opium under that head, and therefore

we shall dismiss the present subject with a briefer notice than we should

otherwise have thought it necessary to bestow upon it. The views of the

Arabians regarding the different kinds of poppy may be best learned from

Avicenna (ii, 2, 563.) He copies, however, almost all his information

from Dioscorides. He recommends the application of the Papaver cornutum

in diseases of the eye, with certain cautions, explained under opium. He

follows Dioscorides in strongly commending the leaves of the same as an

application to foul ulcers, when he says they have the effect of removing

all the eschars upon the sores. Dioscorides, by the way, mentions that

the veterinarians used the horned poppy for removing the albugo and

nebulæ on the eyes of cattle. He speaks favorably of the effects of the

poppy in general for the cure of hot catarrhs, defluxions on the breast,

and hæmoptysis. See further Serapion (c. 72); Rhases (Cont. l. ult. i,

533); Averrhoes (Collig. v, 42.) The last of these joins Avicenna in

approving of the poppy for affections of the chest. Ebn Baithar, in

different parts of his great work, treats of the several species of poppy

noticed under this head.

Μῆλα,

Mala, _Apples_; a common property of all apples is that of an

excrementitious and cold juice, but those which are dissolved and watery

are colder and more humid than the others. The sweet are watery, but not

sensibly cold. Those which are austere are colder than the sweet, but

less humid. Those which are acid are also cold, and cut the thick humours

in the stomach. The sour, such as _Quinces_, and that species of them

called _Struthia_, are of a cold and terrene temperament, and, on that

account, prove astringent of the belly, and agglutinative of wounds. Thus

the leaves, juices, and barks of trees differ from one another.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. By _Mala_, as Macrobius states, the ancients understood all

kinds of fruit which have their hard part or kernel in the middle, and

their esculent part without. (Saturnalia, iii, 19.) The malum cydonium

is undoubtedly the _Quince_. The _Struthia_ is a species of it. See

Dioscorides (i, 160); Pliny (H. N. xv, 10); Casiri (Bibl. Arab. Hisp.

i, 329.) These, namely, the _Struthia_, according to Harduin, are the

same as our _Pear-quince_; it is an astringent, stomachic fruit. There

is more difficulty in determining for certain what the Malum Persicum

was. Stackhouse makes it to be the _Citrus aurantium_, or _Orange_, but

we are disposed to think that the evidence preponderates in favour of

the opinion of Matthiolus, R. Stephens, and Harduin, who held that it

is the _Peach_ (_Amygdalus Persica_.) That species, or rather variety,

which Pliny calls _Duracina_, was probably the _Nectarine_, as Harduin

suggests. The Malum Armeniacum, or præcocia, was undoubtedly the

_Apricot_. See Harduin in Plin. H. N. (xv, 31); Casiri (Bibl. Arab.

Hisp. i, 330); and Gesner (Lex. Rust.) Contrary to the opinion of the

etymologists, we have long thought that the English name is a corruption

of the Latin _præcocia_. See, however, Loudon (Encyc. of Garden. 806.)

We have given their characters as articles of food in the First Book. As

to their medicinal powers, little need be added to our author’s account

of them, as it agrees entirely with that of the other authorities.

See in particular, Dioscorides (i, 160, 166); Galen (De Simpl. vii);

Avicenna (ii, 2, 562.) Galen makes mention of the quince and pear-quince

as being preserved with honey. He recommends the leaves, the juice,

and the rind of apple trees in general, as being possessed of acid

and austere qualities, and thus agglutinating wounds, restraining the

defluxions of incipient inflammations, and strengthening the stomach and

bowels when they have lost their tone. Dioscorides and, afterwards more

fully, Avicenna state that the immoderate use of fruit is flatulent, and

superinduces nervous debility. Dioscorides describes accurately the mode

of preparing a wine from quinces, which, he says, is possessed of the

same medicinal powers as the parts of the quince. He also makes mention

of an ointment prepared from it. Avicenna represents all the fragrant

kinds of apples as being cordial and alexipharmic, and strengtheners of

the stomach. One of Rhases’s authorities gives an interesting account of

the medicinal powers of apples as cordials, stomachics, and astringents.

(Cont. l. ult. i, 441.)

Μηλάια Περσικὴ,

Malum Persicum, _the Peach_; the shoots and leaves are manifestly bitter,

and therefore kill worms when triturated and applied to the navel. The

fruit of it, which forms the edible peach, is humid, and cold in the

second degree.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. See under Μῆλα.

Μηλάια Ἀρμενιακὴ,

Malus Armeniaca, _Apricot_; the fruit, which some call Præcocia, is

possessed of the same powers as peaches.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. See under Μῆλα.

Μῆον,

Meum, _Spignel_; its roots are hot in the third degree, but dry in the

second. It is therefore diuretic and emmenagogue, but occasions headache

when taken often.

* * * * *

The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) · 第 22 / 61 段