COMMENTARY. Most of the botanical authorities agree that it is the

_Mercurialis annua_, L. It occurs frequently in the Hippocratic treatises

as an article of diet and gentle laxative. Dioscorides, who describes it

in two separate places of his Materia Medica, (iii, 130 and iv, 188),

speaks of it as being a laxative pot-herb, and a medicine of which the

decoction in water proves cholagogue and hydragogue. He also alludes to

the popular notion that the leaves of the female plant, when applied to

a woman’s parts of generation after her menstrual period, will promote

conception of a female, while those of the male plant will promote

conception of a male. It does not occur in the works of Celsus, nor,

as far as we can discover, in those of any of the Arabians, with the

exception of Averrhoes, who calls it a gentle purgative of the same class

as Cassia fistula, tamarinds, and the like, and says it evacuates yellow

bile and phlegm; and boiled in wine proves an excellent application

to large sores, and in particular to the ulcers produced by burns. He

further recommends its leaves boiled in vinegar for diseases of the

spleen, and its flower in a masticatory and errhine. (Collig. v, 42.)

What our author says of its virtues in the diseases called _narphia_,

by the vulgar, is taken from Aëtius (i), where, however, the reading

is _carphia_. Galen says of it, “everybody uses the herb mercury for

purging the belly.” (De Simpl. Med.) Notwithstanding this testimony,

which is, in fact, confirmed by that of all the ancient writers who have

treated of it, Bergius says, “Virtus suspecta: vis emolliens nondum ritè

nobis constat.” However, Moses Charras, who appears to have written from

experience, affirms of it that “it loosens the belly, and provokes the

menstruums. The dose is from oz. j to iij.” (Roy. Pharm. 106.) Alston

likewise acknowledges its laxative powers. Dr. Hill says of it, “This

plant is of an emollient nature, and is eaten by many people in the

manner of spinach, which, when cultivated in the garden, it greatly

excels. If eaten largely it gently opens the bowels.” (Mat. Med.) It held

a place in our Dispensatory as late as Quincy. (106.)

Λίτρον,

Nitrum, _Nitre_ (or _Soda_?), is possessed of intermediate powers between

the aphronitrum and salts. When burnt it becomes more attenuate and

discutient. If taken internally it cuts and attenuates the thick and

viscid humours more than any other. The Chalestræan (so called from

Chalestra, a place in Thessalonica) is more acrid and desiccative,

so that it is used for defluxions from the head, and for arthritic

complaints.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. The following extract from Pliny’s description of the

nitrum clearly indicates the substance to which he applies it: “Non

est differenda et nitri natura, non multum a sale distans. Exiguum fit

apud Medos, canescentibus siccitate convallibus, quod vocant halmyrhaga.

Optimum copiosumque in Litis Macedoniæ quod vocant Chalestricum,

candidum, purumque, proximum sali. Lacus est nitrosus, exsiliente e

medio dulci fonticulo. In Ægypto autem conficitur multo abundantius, sed

deterius. Fit pæne eodem modo quo sol, nisi quod salinis mare infundunt,

Nilum autem nitrariis.” (H. N. xxxi, 46.) Compare the above with the

following account of the native carbonate of soda: “In Egypt it is

plentifully found in what are called _the Lakes of Natron_. These lakes,

six in number, are westward of the Nile, not far from Terrana, in a

valley surrounded by limestone. The carbonate and muriate of soda exist

together in these waters; but when the water is diminished by natural

evaporation, these salts are deposited in distinct layers.” (Brogniart,

in Cleaveland’s Mineral., 133.) It would be superfluous to bring any

further proof that the ancient nitrum generally applies to our natron

or the native carbonate of soda. Were the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians

then entirely ignorant of saltpetre or the nitrate of potash? This seems

incredible, considering how largely it is distributed in Europe, Asia,

and Africa; and, therefore, we cannot bring ourselves to think that this

mineral can have entirely escaped the observation of the ancients; and

if this were the proper place for such a disquisition, we believe that

we could state satisfactory reasons for drawing the conclusion, that

“nitrum” was applied to it as well as to the other mineral. But at the

same time, as mentioned above, we are quite satisfied that by _litrum_

and _nitrum_ the medical authors generally, if not universally, meant

the native carbonate of soda. Dioscorides, with regard to its medicinal

powers, merely states of it that it has alterative or metasyncritic

powers. (v, 129.) We have given his views respecting the _Aphronitrum_

under that head. Our author abridges Galen’s account of it, but omits to

mention, as stated by Galen, and also by Aëtius, that the different kinds

of nitre were popularly used as counter-agents in cases of poisoning by

mushrooms. All the Arabians treat largely of this substance generally

under the name of _baurach_. See Avicenna (ii, 2, 84); Rhases (Cont. l.

ult, iii, 115); Mesue (De Simpl. xvii); Serapion (c. 401); Haly Abbas

(Pract. ii, 46, 487); Ebn Baithar (i, 187.) Rhases marks what it is:

“Nitrum appellatur Arabicè natrum et est simile sali gemmæ.” (Cont.

l. ult. ii, 508.) They used it externally for the cure of prurigo and

scabies, and as an application to diseased joints, and along with figs

to remove dropsical swellings. They recommend an injection of it into

the ear for the cure of deafness. The aphronitrum, or African nitrum,

is said by Avicenna to be possessed of emetic powers, and that it was

more incisive of gross humours than the other varieties of it. It was

used by them in cases of poisoning with mushrooms, cantharides, and

bull’s blood; and as an application to the bites of mad dogs. Mesue, with

his wonted precision, states its powers very distinctly, recommending

it, when given by the mouth, in clysters, and in suppositories as an

evacuant of crude and viscid phlegm, for colic and affections of the

stomach. Like Avicenna, he says that it will sometimes occasion vomiting.

His commentator, Costa, has many ingenious observations on the ancient

nitrum, which will be found very interesting to those who desire to

become better acquainted with this subject. Haly Abbas states that

friction with it before the hour of invasion will prevent an attack of

ague.

Λόγχιτις,

Lonchitis, _Rough Spleenwort_; the root of that species which has

triangular seed, like a spear, resembles that of the carrot, and is

diuretic. But the green leaves of that species which resembles the

scolopendrium, are agglutinative of wounds; and when dried, and drunk

with vinegar, they cure indurated spleens.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Our author’s account of the two species of _Lonchitis_ is

taken from Dioscorides. Of these, the former, which has been conjectured

to be the _Serapias Lingua_, he says is diuretic. The other, which

would seem to be the species of _aspidium_, to which the name is still

appropriated, he calls vulnerary and anti-inflammatory, and recommends

for reducing the size of the spleen. Galen and the other authorities

give a similar account of it. Such of the Arabians as treat of it follow

Dioscorides. See Avicenna (ii, 2, 336.)

Λύκοψις,

Lycopsis, _Hound’s-tongue_; having an astringent root, Dioscorides says,

that when applied with polenta in a cataplasm, it agrees with erysipelas,

and that if rubbed in with oil it is sudorific.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. It is either the _Echium Italicum_, L., or the _Lycopsis

echioides_, L., probably the former. Our author, as he acknowledges,

borrows from Dioscorides. Galen, Aëtius, and Oribasius, as well as

Hippocrates and Celsus, do not treat of it at all. If the Arabians notice

it, they do so under the head of _Anchusa_.

Λύκιον,

Lycium, _Buckthorn_, is composed of heterogeneous powers, one part

of its ingredients being heating, attenuate, and discutient, and the

other, or terrene part, being cooling and gently astringent; so that it

is desiccative in the second degree, and calefacient and refrigerant

in an intermediate degree. They use it, therefore, as a detergent in

obstructions of the pupil, and as an astringent in cæliac and dysenteric

cases and ill-conditioned ulcers; and in inflammations as a discutient.

The Indian is the best.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Dioscorides gives a sufficiently distinct description of the

tree which produces the _lycium_, so as to leave no doubt that he points

to the _Rhamnus infectorius_. The _Lycium Indicum_ of the same author, is

now satisfactorily determined to be the product of the _Berberis Lycium_.

See Royle (Antiq. of Hind. Med. 32), and ‘Linn. Transact.’ (xvii, 83);

also Pereira (Materia Medica, 1152.) Dioscorides recommends the former

of these as an astringent for the cure of various complaints, such as

obscurities of the cornea, psoriasis, and pruritus of the eyelids,

purulent ears and tonsils, ulcers of the gums, chapped lips, fissure

of the anus; in cæliac and dysenteric affections, both in draughts and

clysters; in hæmoptysis and coughs; in female fluxes, hydrophobia, and

so forth. The Indian, he states, cures inflammation of the spleen and

jaundice, prevents menstruation, purges water, and is a counter-agent to

deadly poisons. (i, 132.) Galen’s account of it being nearly the same as

our author’s, we need not expound at any length. He holds that the Indian

species is far stronger than the other. (De Simpl. ix.) Oribasius and

Aëtius in like manner follow Galen. Celsus recommends lycium strongly

in ulceration of the throat. (iv, 4, 3.) As far as we have been able to

discover, it does not occur in the works of Hippocrates. The Arabians

treat fully of this article. See Rhases (Cont. l. ult. i, 429); Avicenna

(ii, 2, 390); Serapion (c. 7); Averrhoes (v, 42.) We do not find that

they supply any new views regarding its medicinal virtues. In the modern

Greek Pharmacopœia the extract of catechu is set down as being the

_Lycium Indicum_. We agree, however, with the authorities quoted above

regarding it.

Λυσιμάχιον,

Lysimachium, _Moneywort_; its prevailing power is astringency; hence it

agglutinates wounds, and is styptic, both itself and its juice. It also

relieves dysentery when drunk and injected.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. The L. of Dioscorides and our author is most probably the

Yellow Loose-strife of our English herbalists, namely, _Lysimachia

vulgaris_, L. Our author abridges Dioscorides, who recommends it as an

astringent in various cases, such as hæmoptysis, dysentery, fluor albus,

hemorrhage from the nose, and as a vulnerary and styptic herb. (iv, 3.)

Galen and Aëtius treat of it in nearly the same words as our author.

We have not been able to find it in the works of the Arabians, except

Ebn Baithar, and yet we do not assert that it may not be treated of

under some name which we have not been able to interpret. Ebn Baithar

merely quotes Dioscorides and Galen. The lysimachia, although not now

included in our Dispensatories, still holds a place in the shops of

the apothecaries, with the character of being astringent. See Gray’s

Supplement, &c. (48.)

Λυχνὶς,

Lychnis, _Campion_; the seed of that species which is used for garlands

is hot and desiccative, according to the second order complete.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. This plant is the _Lychnis coronaria_ of Dioscorides, and

still retains this name. Dioscorides recommends it in the case of persons

stung by scorpions. The wild lychnis of Dioscorides may be either the

_Lychnis dioica_ or _Agrostemma githago_; it is said by Dioscorides to

be a cholagogue, and a remedy in the case of persons stung by scorpions.

(iii, 104-5.) Galen and the other authorities merely state the characters

of the _Lychnis coronaria_ in general terms. We have not found this

article in any of the Arabians, not even in Ebn Baithar.

Λωτὸς,

Lotus, _Bird’s-foot Trefoil_ (?); the cultivated species is by some

called trifolium. It is possessed of detergent and moderately desiccative

powers, and is of a proper temperament as to heat. The seed of the wild

lotus belongs to the second order of calefacients, and is also somewhat

detergent. The seed of the Egyptian lotus is also made into bread.

The _Lote_, or _Nettle-tree_, consists of subtile particles, and is

moderately desiccative and astringent. Hence it is applicable for the

female fluor, and for fluxes of the bowels, both when drunk with wine or

water, or when used in an injection. It also strengthens the hairs that

are falling out.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. We need not enter further into the literary history of this

interesting subject, which we have given at some length in the Appendix,

already so often referred to, than to mention that the Lotus, called also

Trifolium, is referable to the _Melilotus officinalis_, and probably

some of its congeners, and the Lotus Arbor to the _Zizyphus Lotus_, with

perhaps some other trees of the same tribe. Dr. Lindley says of it, “The

Lote-bush, which gave its name to the ancient Lotophagi, is to this day

collected for food by the Arabs of Barbary, who call it sadar, and its

berries nabk.” (Veg. Kingd. 582.) The wild lotus of Dioscorides and the

other authorities has never been satisfactorily determined. Perhaps it

was the species of _melilotus_ named _cærulea_. The Egyptian lotus, there

can be no doubt, was the _Nymphæa Lotus_, L. Dioscorides gives a striking

description of this last, which, he says, the inhabitants of Egypt

use for making bread; and it is deserving of remark that the rhizomes

of the nymphæa are still roasted and eaten by the Negroes of Senegal.

See further under _Nymphæa_ in this section. Our author’s characters

of the other loti are copied from Dioscorides or Galen, who agree, in

the main, under this head. See, in like manner, Aëtius and Oribasius.

The Arabians treat at great length of the different loti, and more

especially of the L. Arbor, with which they must have been familiarly

acquainted. See Avicenna (ii, 2, 298, 513); Serapion (c. 120); Rhases

(Cont. l. ult. i, 487); Ebn Baithar (ii, 539.) They all recommend it as a

powerful astringent in looseness of the bowels, bloody flux, menorrhagia,

ulcers of the bowels, and in asthma and affections of the chest. One of

Serapion’s authorities calls it stomachic and a whetter of the appetite.

The lotus occurs in the Hippocratic treatises; indeed, from the fable of

the Lotophagi, contained in the Odyssey of Homer, there can be no doubt

that the lotus had been known and used as an article of food long before

the time of Hippocrates.

Μάκερ,

Macer is a bark brought from India, being desiccative in the third order,

and intermediate as to heating and cooling properties. It consists of

subtile particles, and is astringent; hence it agrees with cæliac and

dysenteric complaints.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Under this head we cannot do better than quote the words

of an excellent living authority: “_Macer_, a bark from the Barbaric

region, has been thought to be _Wrightia antidysenterica_, supposing

this to be the _macre_ described by Crist. d’Acosta. (Clus. Exot. 266.)

Though _macer_ is always described as a bark, I had given me as such the

highly aromatic leaves of _Rhododendron lepidotum_ under the name of

_talisfur_. _Mafur_ and _mafurbooz_ are in Persian works assigned as the

Greek names of _talisafar_, under which name the _macer_ of Dioscorides

is alluded to by Avicenna.” (Antiq. of Hindoo Med. 91, by Dr. Royle).

Though the _macer_ of the Greeks, then, was different from mace, there

can be no doubt that the Arabians confounded the two substances together.

Thus Avicenna, in his chapter on mace, quotes the words of Paulus on

the macer. (ii, 2, 448.) Serapion in like manner, under mace, which he

correctly describes as the rind or membrane of the nutmeg, gives the

characters of macer from Dioscorides. (De Simpl. 2.)

Μαλάβαθρον,

Malabathrum; the leaf of it has powers like the spikenard.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. Dr. Ainslie, treating of the Cassia Lignea, or Cassia bark,

says, “the narrow-pointed leaves of the _Laurus Cassia_, as well as the

oblong, ovate, shining leaves of the Cinnamon-tree, are sold in the

Indian bazaars under the names of _lawangapatery_ and _tejpat_, from

a notion that they are the leaves of the _Laurus Cassia_. In commerce

these leaves are called _Folia Indica_, or _Malabathra_, a name which

more especially applies to the leaves of the Laurus Cassia.” (Med. Ind.

§ 35.) Geoffroy, Sprengel, and Royle also agree in holding the Cassia,

or Cinnamon-leaf, to be the _Folium Indicum_. Dr. Sontheimer, then, in

his translation of Ibn Baithar, makes it to be a peculiar species of

_Laurus_, calling it _Laurus Malabathrum_, and Dr. Pereira does the

same. In the modern Greek Pharmacopœia, the query is put whether the

Cassia-buds be the product of _Laurus Cassia_, or _L. Malabathrum_.

Isidorus says of it, “_Folium_ dictum quod sine ulla radice innatans

in Indiæ littoribus colligitur.” (Orig. xviii, 9.) It is always simply

called _Folium_ by Apicius. Horace applies the word to an ointment.

“Malabathro Syrio capillos,” (Od. ii, 7); on which passage his

commentator, Porphyrion, remarks, “Malabathrum unguenti speciem esse

scimus.” This is the Unguentum Malabathrinum of Dioscorides. (i, 76.)

The ancients, as Dr. Hill remarks, have said much of the virtues of

Malabathrum. They call it stomachic, sudorific, and cephalic. Dioscorides

ascribes to it all the virtues of the Indian spikenard; but he says it

possesses them in a superior degree. He also mentions it as a scent. (i,

11.) Galen and the other Greek authorities, like our author, dismiss

it with a brief notice, comparing it to spikenard. The Arabians treat

of it at greater length, but do little more, after all, than copy the

characters of it given by Dioscorides. See Avicenna (ii, 2, 253);

Serapion (c. 53.) It occurs only once in the works of Celsus (v, 23), as

an ingredient, in one of his antidotes; and does not occur at all, we

believe, in the Hippocratic Collection.

Μαλάχη,

Malva, _Mallows_; the wild is moderately discutient and emollient; but

the garden, as being more moistening, is also weaker. Its fruit, however,

is as much stronger as it is drier.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. There seems no reason to doubt that it applies to _Malva

sylvestris_, but probably comprehended other species. Dioscorides

describes minutely the cases to which it is applicable, namely, as a

cataplasm in incipient fistula lachrymalis, with oil for achores and

furfures, and also so prepared for burns and erysipelas; its decoction as

a hip-bath in diseases of the uterus; and as a suitable enema in pains of

the bowels, womb, and anus; its broth he praises in cases of poisoning,

as producing evacuation of the stomach, and says it is beneficial to

persons stung by phalangia, and attracts milk to the breasts; its fruit,

when the reed of the wild lotus is mixed with it, allays pains about the

bladder. (ii, 144.) Galen and the other Greek authorities treat of it as

a medicine in more general terms, representing it to be gently discutient

and demulcent. It occurs in the works of Hippocrates and Celsus; the

latter praises it as a pot-herb, and recommends it as a gentle laxative.

(vii, 27.) The Arabians treat of it fully; but have little to add to

the excellent description of its medicinal powers given by Dioscorides,

whom they all copy. One of Serapion’s authorities briefly commends

it as a demulcent in affections of the chest and bladder, and as a

cataplasm in hot apostemes. (c. 149.) Avicenna’s account of it is highly

interesting, but too lengthy for our purpose. He recommends it internally

in complaints of the lungs and liver, and externally as an emollient

application in a variety of cases. (ii, 2, 194.)

Μαμιρὰς,

Mamiras, is a sort of radicle of a herb, having, as it were, thick knots,

which are believed to attenuate cicatrices and leucomata, being of a

decidedly detergent power.

COMMENTARY. This article is not mentioned by Dioscorides, Pliny, Galen,

Oribasius, nor, we believe, by any of the Arabian writers, with the

exception of Avicenna, who calls it abstergent and cleansing, and

recommends it for clearing away albugo of the eye, and for cleaning the

nails; he adds of it that it is useful in jaundice and pungent pain of

the belly. (ii, 2, 479.) It further occurs in one of the antidotes of

Nicholas Myrepsus (c. 138), where, his commentator says, the description

of it given by Paulus applies very well to the root known officinally by

the name of _Doronicum_.

Μανδραγόρας,

Mandragora, _Mandrake_, belongs to the third order of cold medicines. But

its apples have a certain share of heat and humidity, and hence they are

possessed of a soporific power. The bark of the root of it being stronger

is not only cooling, but also desiccant; but the inner part of it is weak.

* * * * *

The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) · 第 21 / 61 段