No doubt, in early days, horses were mainly ridden on a cant

Produced by Julia Miller and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was

produced from images generously made available by The

Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

By the same Author.

_THE CAMPAIGN OF CHANCELLORSVILLE._

It is not easy to say which part of this book is best, for it is all

good.--_The Nation._

We do not hesitate to pronounce it one of the ablest, fairest, and

most valuable books that we have seen.--_Southern Historical Papers._

_A BIRD'S-EYE VIEW OF OUR CIVIL WAR_

Is all that could be desired: gives perhaps a clearer, more

vivid view, a more accurate outline than any other available

record.--_London Saturday Review._

The material of the work well serves to consolidate and orient the

knowledge of what was done in the Great Rebellion and of those who did

it.--_Journal Military Service Institution._

We do not hesitate to commend the book most warmly as the work of an

able, painstaking soldier, who has honestly endeavored to ascertain

and frankly to tell the truth about the war.--_Southern Historical

Papers._

The book is written in a spirit of impartiality and of just

discrimination concerning the merits and defects of the generals who

led the armies of the North and South.--_Army and Navy Journal._

[Illustration: PLATE I.

PATROCLUS.]

PATROCLUS AND PENELOPE

_A Chat in the Saddle_

BY

THEODORE AYRAULT DODGE

BREVET LIEUTENANT-COLONEL UNITED STATES ARMY, RETIRED LIST; AUTHOR OF

"THE CAMPAIGN OF CHANCELLORSVILLE," "A BIRD'S-EYE VIEW OF OUR CIVIL

WAR," ETC., ETC.

BOSTON

HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY

New York: 11 East Seventeenth Street

The Riverside Press, Cambridge

1885

Copyright, 1885,

BY THEODORE AYRAULT DODGE.

_All rights reserved._

_The Riverside Press, Cambridge_:

Electrotyped and Printed by H. O. Houghton and Company.

To

THE COUNTRY CLUB OF BOSTON,

WHICH HAS FOSTERED A TRUE APPRECIATION OF GOOD HORSEMANSHIP IN OUR

CITY OF BEAUTIFUL ENVIRONMENTS, AND WHOSE GENEROUS AND ABLE

ADMINISTRATION HAS AFFORDED THE LOVERS OF THE SADDLE SO MANY

OCCASIONS OF RARE ENTERTAINMENT,

These Pages are Inscribed

BY

A MEMBER.

_Since--as it has been our fortune to be long engaged about horses--we

consider that we have acquired some knowledge of horsemanship, we

desire also to intimate to the younger part of our friends how we

think that they may bestow their attention on horses to the best

advantage._

XENOPHON on Horsemanship, I. I.

Transcriber's Note: The Table of Contents have been moved from the back of

the book to the front.

CONTENTS.

PAGE

I. Patroclus and I 19

II. Saddles and Seats 22

III. Patroclus on a Rack 28

IV. The Rack and Single-Foot 29

V. Patroclus Trotting 32

VI. Thoroughbred or Half-Bred 33

VII. The Saddle Mania 35

VIII. Park-Riding 37

IX. A Fine Horse not necessarily a Good Hack 39

X. Soldiers have Stout Seats 41

XI. A Gate and a Brook 44

XII. The Old Trooper 48

XIII. Instruction in Riding 49

XIV. Chilly Fox-Hunting 51

XV. Is Soldier or Fox-Hunter the Better Rider? 55

XVI. The School-Rider 56

XVII. Patroclus happy 59

XVIII. Photography versus Art 61

XIX. A One-Man Horse 69

XX. Baucher's Favorite Saddle Horse 70

XXI. Patroclus sniffs a Friend 73

XXII. Riding-Schools and School-Riding 74

XXIII. Is Schooling of Value? 76

XXIV. Manuals of Training 82

XXV. Result of Training 83

XXVI. Qualities of the Horse 86

XXVII. Dress, Saddles, and Bridles 87

XXVIII. Mounting 89

XXIX. How to hold the Reins 92

XXX. How to begin Training 94

XXXI. Penelope's Unrestrained Courage 97

XXXII. Hints before beginning to train a Horse 98

XXXIII. Guiding by the Neck 104

XXXIV. What an Arched Neck means 109

XXXV. Flexions of the Neck 113

XXXVI. Flexions of the Croup 116

XXXVII. The Canter 121

XXXVIII. Leading with either Shoulder 125

XXXIX. The Horse's Natural Lead 131

XL. The Best Way to teach the Lead 135

XLI. Change of Lead in Motion 138

XLII. Suggestions 141

XLIII. How to begin Jumping 143

XLIV. The Reins in the Jump 148

XLV. Odds and Ends of Leaping 152

XLVI. Hunting and Road-Riding 155

XLVII. Advantages of True Rack 157

XLVIII. Who is the Best Rider? 160

XLIX. Vale! 166

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.

1. PATROCLUS _Frontispiece._

2. A QUIET AMBLE 12

3. THE RACK OR RUNNING WALK 24

4. A SHARP SINGLE-FOOT 36

5. AN EASY CANTER 48

6. A TEN-MILE TROT 60

7. RISING TO A HURDLE 72

8. FLYING A HURDLE 84

9. CLEAN ABOVE IT 96

10. TAKING OFF AT WATER 108

11. DOING IT HANDILY 120

12. A TWENTY-FOOT JUMP 132

13. ABOUT TO LAND 144

14. LANDING 156

BEFORE MOUNTING.

But a few months since, the author, whose thirty odd years in the

saddle in many parts of the world have, he trusts, taught him that

modesty which should always be bred of usage, was showing some of

the instantaneous photographs of his horse Patroclus to a group of

Club men. Most of the gentlemen were old friends, but one of the

photographs having been passed to a by-stander, whose attire marked

him as belonging to the most recently developed Boston type of

horsemen, elicited, much to his listeners' entertainment, the remark

that "naw man can wide in a saddle like that, ye know, not weally

wide, ye know! naw _fawm_, ye know! wouldn't be tolewated in our

school, ye know!" The author was informed by a mutual acquaintance

that the gentleman was taking a course of lessons at the swellest

riding academy of the city, and had recently imported an English

gelding. In deference to such excellent authority, whose not unkindly

meant, if somewhat brusquely uttered, criticism may be said to have

inspired these pages, otherwise perhaps without a suitable _motif_,

an explanation appears to be called for, lest by some other youthful

equestrian critics the physician be advised to heal himself.

The exclusive use of the English hunting-rig and crop for all kinds

and conditions of men at all times and in all places is well

understood by old horsemen to be but a matter of fashion which time

may displace in favor of some other novelty. For their proper purpose

they are undeniably the best. But to the newly fledged equestrian who

makes them his shibboleth, and who discards as "bad form" any

variation upon the road from what is eminently in place after hounds,

the author, with an admiration for the excellencies of the English

seat derived from half a dozen years' residence in the Old Country and

many a sharp run in the flying-counties, and with the consciousness

that, if tried in the balance of to-day's Anglomania, his own seat, as

shown in some of the illustrations, may chance to be found wanting,

desires to explain that, during the Civil War, outrageous fortune,

among other slings and arrows, sent him to the rear with the loss of a

leg; but that far from giving up a habit thus become all the more

essential because he could no longer safely sit a flat saddle, he

concluded to supplement his lack of grip (as the Marquis of Anglesea

for a similar reason had done before him) by the artificial support

which is afforded in the rolls and pads of a somerset or demi-pique,

as well as to adopt the seat best suited to his disability. And it was

such a saddle, of a pattern perhaps too pronounced to suit even the

author's eye, however comfortable and safe,--particularly so in

leaping, which provoked the censure, perhaps quite justifiable

according to the light of the critic, which has been quoted above.

This variation, however, by no means conflicts with the author's

belief in, and constant advocacy of, the flat English saddle _in its

place_. But he has seen so many accomplished riders in quite different

saddles, that he became long ago convinced that the English tree by no

means affords the only perfect seat. In fact, the saddle best suited

to universal use, that is, the one which might best serve a man under

any conditions, approaches, in his opinion, more nearly the modified

military saddle of to-day than the hunting type.

Nor because a local fashion, set but yesterday, prescribes strict

adherence to a style he cannot follow, is the author less ready to

venture upon giving a friendly word of advice to many of our young and

aspiring riders. There are not a few gentlemen in Boston, whose months

in the saddle number far less than the author's years, to whose

courage and discretion as horsemen he yields his very honest

admiration, and whose stanch hunters he is happy to follow across

country, nor ashamed if he finds he has lost them from sight. He

regrets to say that he has also seen not a few who affect to sneer at

a padded saddle or a horse with a long tail, who seem incapable of

throwing their heart across a thirty inch stone wall in a burst after

hounds, although upon the road they seek to impress one as constantly

riding to cover.

It is unnecessary, however, to say that the author has too long been a

lover of equestrianism _per se_ not to admire the good and be tolerant

of the bad for the total sum of gain which the horseback mania of

to-day affords. He is old enough to remember that human nature remains

the same, however fast the world may move, and is firm in the belief

that we shall soon grow to be a nation of excellent horsemen.

[Illustration: PLATE II.

A QUIET AMBLE.]

There is no pretense to make these pages a new manual for horse-training

or for riding. There are plenty of good books on horsemanship now in

print; but unfortunately there are few riders who care for anything

beyond a superficial education of either their horses or themselves.

More than rudimentary--if viewed in the light of the High School--the

hints in this volume can scarcely be considered. If any incentive to

the study of the real art and to the better training of saddle beasts

is given, all that these pages deserve will have been gained.

The plates are phototype reproductions from photographs of Patroclus,

taken in action by Baldwin Coolidge. Their origin lay in the belief

that a fine-gaited horse could be instantaneously photographed, and

still show the agreeable action which all horse-lovers admire, and

have been habituated to see drawn by artists, instead of the ungainly

positions usually resulting from the instantaneous process. The object

aimed at--to show an anatomically correct and artistically acceptable

horse in each case--has, it is thought, been gained, so far, at least,

as motion arrested can ever give the idea of motion.

Out of thirty photographs taken, the fourteen herein given, and one or

two others, much resembling some of these, showed an agreeable action.

The best positions of the horse were often the poorest photographs. In

enlarging them by solar prints for the phototype process, the shadows

of the horse have been darkened, or in some instances, where a

negative has been blurred or injured, an indistinct line has been

strengthened. In some plates the photograph was so clear (as Plates

IV. and V.) that no darkening of the shadows was necessary. In others

(as Plates VII. and VIII.) the negative, though showing excellent

position, was so weak as to require a good deal of treatment. But in

even the most indistinct ones the outline and crude shadows were

clearly shown by the negatives, and followed absolutely in treating

the solar prints. The plates are thus obtained intact from the

original instantaneous negatives, and faithfully represent the action

and spirit of the horse. The jumping pictures were taken against the

natural background, the others against a screen or building. In the

latter, the entire background has been made white, for greater

distinctness. The water-jump was in reality a dry ditch of eleven feet

wide from bar to bank. But being hidden in the original negatives by

the heaps of earth thrown up in digging it, and several of the

negatives being blurred in the foreground, the water was added in the

solar prints. To preserve anatomical accuracy, the finer results of

both photography and of the phototype process have had to be

sacrificed.

To state that the author has often witnessed the prize leaping at the

Agricultural Hall Horse Show in London, as well as watched the contest

of many a noted English steeple-chase, will absolve him from any

suspicion of parading these photographs as examples of excellent

performance. They were all taken in cold blood on one occasion, and

Patroclus was ridden alone over the obstacles at least a dozen times

for each good picture secured. Every horseman knows that this is a

pretty sound test of a willing jumper, if not a crack one. Moreover,

the author has been acquainted with too many masters of equitation, at

home as well as abroad, to harbor any but a very modest opinion of his

own equestrian ability. He would be much more sensitive to criticism

of Patroclus than of himself, for he knows the horse to be an

exceptionally good one within his limitations, while always conscious

that his own seat lacks the firmness of ante-bellum days. It used to

be said in the Old Country that an Englishman keeps his seat to manage

his horse, and that a Frenchman manages his horse to keep his seat.

The author is obliged to confess that to-day he is often reduced to

the latter practice.

The hurdles were somewhat over four feet high; behind each was a bar

just four feet from the ground. The water-jumps were from fifteen to

eighteen feet from taking-off to landing. On a number of occasions (as

in Plate XII.) Patroclus covered over twenty measured feet in this

jump.

As is manifest from a few of the plates, it was the action of the

horse, and not the "form" of the rider, which it was aimed to secure.

It is easy to make engravings in which the seat of the rider shall be

perfect; but in all the wood-cut illustrations of books on equitation

the horse is usually anatomically incorrect, however artistically

suggestive. One never sees the photograph of a horse clearing an

obstacle in which the rider's form is as perfect as it is apt to

be depicted in engravings or paintings. And in some of the within

illustrations of road gaits there is apparent a carelessness in both

seat and reins which would scarcely do in the accomplishment of the

high airs of the _manege_, but into which a rider is sometimes apt

unconsciously to lapse. No one is probably better aware of what is

good and bad alike in these plates than the author himself. He

appreciates "form" at its exact value, but is constrained to believe

that the true article comes from sources far removed from, and of

vastly more solid worth than the pigskin which covers a rider's

saddle, or the shears which bang his horse's tail. The searching power

of photography, however, is no respecter of form or person.

A word of thanks should not be omitted to Mr. Coolidge, whose

excellent judgment and keen eye in taking these pictures, without

other apparatus than his lens, is well shown by the result, nor to the

Lewis Engraving Company for their careful reproductions from material

by no means perfect.

Perhaps it should be said that Master Tom and Penelope, who figure in

these pages, are as really in the flesh as Patroclus, and by no means

mere fictions of the imagination.

There is no instruction pretended to be conveyed by these plates, as

there is in the similarly obtained illustrations of Anderson's

excellent "Modern Horsemanship." Their purpose is less to point a

moral than to adorn a tale. But an apology to all is perhaps due for

the very chatty manner in which the author has taken his friend, the

reader, into his confidence, and to experienced horsemen for the very

elementary hints sometimes given. The pages devoted to Penelope are

meant for young riders who, like Master Tom, really want to learn.

THEODORE AYRAULT DODGE.

BROOKLINE, MASS., _April, 1885_.

PATROCLUS AND PENELOPE.

A CHAT IN THE SADDLE.

I.

We are fast friends, Patroclus, and many's the hour since, five years

ago, I bought you, an impetuous but good-tempered and intelligent

three-year-old colt, whom every one thought too flighty to be of much

account, that you and I have spent in each other's company upon the

pretty suburban roads of Boston. And many's the scamper and frolic

that we've had across the fields, and many's the quiet stroll through

the shady woods! For you and I, Patroclus, can go where it takes a

goodish horse to follow in our wake. I wonder, as I look into your

broad and handsome face, whether you know and love me as well as I do

you. Indeed, when you whinny at my distant step, or rub your

inquisitive old nose against my hands or towards my pocket, begging

for another handful of oats or for a taste of salt or sugar; or when

you confidingly lower your head to have me rub your ears, with so much

restful intelligence beaming from your soft, brown eyes, and such

evident liking for my company, I think you know how warm my heart

beats for you. And how generous the blood which courses through your

own tense veins your master knows full well. If I had to flee for my

life, Patroclus, I should wish that your mighty back, tough thews, and

noble courage could bear me through the struggle. For I never called

upon you yet, but what there came the response which only the truest

of your race can give.

No, Pat! you've got all the sugar you can have to-day. My pockets are

not a grocer's shop. Stand quiet while I mount, and you and I will

take our usual stroll.

* * * * *

Patroclus is said to have been sired in the Old Country out of a

cavalry mare brought over by an English officer to Quebec, and there

foaled in Her Majesty's service. Even this much I had on hearsay. But

he has the instincts of the charger in every fibre,--and perhaps the

most intelligent and best saddle beasts among civilized nations belong

to mounted troops. As old Hiram Woodruff used to say, Patroclus makes

his own pedigree. I know what he is; I care not whence he came.

No need to extol your points. Though there be those of higher lineage,

and many a speedier horse upon the turf, or perchance a grander

performer after hounds, thrice your value to whoso will find fault or

blemish upon you, my Patroclus! You are blood-bay and glossy as a

satin kerchief. You are near sixteen hands; short coupled enough to

carry weight, and long enough below to take an ample stride. You tread

as light as a steel watch-spring quivers. A woman's face has rarely a

sweeter or more trusting look than yours in repose; a falcon's eye is

no keener when aroused. You will follow me like a dog, and your little

mistresses can fondle you in stall or paddock. You have all the life

and endurance of the thoroughbred, the intelligence of the Arab, the

perfect manners of the park, and the power and discretion of a Midland

Counties hunter. Like the old song, you have

"A head like a snake, and a skin like a mouse,

An eye like a woman, bright, gentle, and brown;

With loins and a back that would carry a house,

And quarters to lift you smack over a town."

May it be many a year yet, Patroclus, before I must pension you off

for good!

* * * * *

You stand for me to mount as steady as a rock. And you know your

crippled master's needs so well that you would do it in the whirl of a

stampede. I will leave the reins upon your neck and let you walk

whither your own fancy dictates, for I am lazily inclined; though

indeed I know from your tossing head that you fain would go a livelier

gait. So long as you can walk your four full miles an hour, you will

have to curb your ardor for many a long stretch, while your master

chews the cud of sweet and bitter fancies.

* * * * *

As we saunter along, the reflections bred of thirty odd years in the

saddle come crowding up. From a Shelty with a scratch-pack in Surrey a

generation since, to many a cavalry charge with bugle-clash and

thundering tread on Old Dominion soil now twenty years ago, the daily

life with that best of friends,--save always one,--the perfect saddle

horse, brings many thoughts to mind. What if we jot them down?

II.

The most common delusion under which the average equestrian is apt to

labor in every part of the world is that his own style of riding

is the one _par excellence_. Whether the steeple-chaser on his

thoroughbred, or the Indian on his mustang is the better rider, cannot

well be decided. The peculiar horsemanship of every country has its

manifest advantages, and is the natural outgrowth of, as well as

peculiarly adapted to, the climate, roads, and uses to which the horse

is put. The cowboy who can defy the bucking broncho will be unseated

by a two-year-old which any racing-stable boy can stick to, while this

same boy would hardly sit the third stiff boost of the ragged,

grass-fed pony. The best horseman of the desert would be nowhere in

the hunting-field. The cavalry-man who, with a few of his fellows, can

carve his way through a column of infantry, may not be able to compete

at polo with a Newport swell. The jockey who will ride over five and a

half feet of timber or twenty feet of water would make sorry work in

pulling down a lassoed steer. Each one in his element is by far the

superior of the other, but none of these is just the type of horseman

whom the denizen of our busy cities, for his daily enjoyment, cares to

make his pattern.

The original barbarian, no doubt, clasped his undersized mount with

all the legs he had, as every natural rider does to-day. When saddle

and stirrups came into use, followed anon by spurs, discretion soon

taught the grip with knee and thigh alone, the heels being kept for

other purposes than support. It must, however, be set down to the

credit of the original barbarian that he probably did not ride in the

style known as "tongs on a wall." This certainly not admirable seat

originated with the knight in heavy armor, and has since been adhered

to by many nations, and, through the Spaniards, has found its way to

every part of the Americas. But as a rule, wild riders have the bent

knee which gives the firmest bareback seat. The long stirrup and high

cantle must not be condemned for certain purposes. When not carried to

the furthest extreme they have decided advantages. It is by no means

sure that any other seat would be equally easy on the cantering

mustang for so many scores of miles a day as many men on the plains

customarily cover. And though for our city purposes and mounts it is

distinctly unavailable, one must be cautious in depreciating a seat

which is clung to so tenaciously by so many splendid riders. It is a

mistake to suppose that the Southerners and Mexicans, as well as

soldiers, all ride with straight leg. While you often see this fault

carried to an extreme among all these, the best horsemen I have

generally observed riding with a naturally bent knee. And it takes a

great deal to convince a good rider of any of these classes that a man

who will lean and rise to a trot knows the A B C of equestrianism.

[Illustration: PLATE III.

THE RACK OR RUNNING WALK.]

Whether the first saddle had a short seat and long stirrups, _a la

militaire_, or a long seat with short ones, _a l'Anglaise_, matters

little. Though the original home of the horse boasts to-day the

shortest of stirrups (and even in Xenophon's time this appears to have

been the Asiatic habit), a reasonably long one would seem to have been

the most natural first step from the bareback seat. If so, what is it

that has gradually lengthened the seat of the Englishman, who

represents for us to-day the favorite type of civilized horsemanship,

and if not the best, perhaps nearest that which is best suited to our

Eastern wants?

No doubt, in early days, horses were mainly ridden on a canter or a

gallop. If perchance a trot, it was a mere shog, comfortable enough

with a short seat and high cantle. The early horse was a short-gaited

creature. But two things came gradually about. Dirt roads grew into

turnpikes; and the pony-gaited nag began, about the days of the Byerly

Turk, nearly two hundred years ago, to develop into the long-striding

thoroughbred. The paved pike speedily proved that a canter sooner

injures the fetlock joints of the forelegs and strains the sinews of

the hind than a trot, and men merciful unto their beasts or careful of

their pockets began to ride the latter gait. But when the step in the

trot became longer and speedier as the saddle horse became better

bred, riders were not long in finding out that to rise in the stirrups

was easier for both man and beast, and as shorter stirrups materially

aid the rise, the seat began to grow in length. It has been proved

satisfactorily to the French, who have always been "close" riders,

that to rise in the trot saves the horse to a very great percentage,

put by some good authorities at as high a figure as one sixth.

Moreover, it was not a strange step forward. That it is natural to

rise in the trot is shown by there being to-day many savage or

semi-civilized tribes which practice the habit in entire

unconsciousness of its utility being a disputed point anywhere.

Another reason for shortening the leathers no doubt prevailed. The

English found the most secure seat for vigorous leaping to be the long

one. Of course a little obstacle can be cleared in any saddle; but

with the long seat, the violent exertion of the horse in a high jump

does not loosen the grip with knees and calves, but at most only

throws one's buckskin from the saddle, as indeed it should not even do

that. For the knees being well in front of, instead of hanging below,

the seat of honor, enables a man to lean back and sustain the jar of

landing without parting company with his mount, while a big jump with

stirrups too long, if it unseats you at all, loosens your entire grip,

or may throw you against the pommel in a highly dangerous manner.

Moreover, with short stirrups, the horse is able on occasion to run

and jump "well away from under you," while, except during the leap

itself, the weight for considerable distances may be sustained by the

stirrups alone, and thus be better distributed for the horse over

ground where the footing is unsteady, as it is in ridge and furrow.

No better illustration of the uses of these several seats than an

English cavalry officer. On parade he will ride with the longest of

stirrups compatible with not sitting on his crotch. To rise in the

saddle is a forbidden luxury to the soldier. Despite some recent

experiments in foreign service, and the fact that on the march the

cavalry-man may be permitted to rise, nay, encouraged to do so, what

more ridiculous than a troop of cavalry on parade, each man bobbing up

and down at his own sweet will? The horse suitable for a trooper is a

short, quick-gaited, handy animal, chosen largely for this quality,

and made still more so by being taught to work in a collected manner

by the _manege_. You can very comfortably sit him with a military

saddle at a pretty sharp parade trot. Now, suppose our cavalry officer

is going for a canter in Rotten Row,--he will at once shorten his

stirrup-leathers a couple of holes; and if he were going to ride

cross-country, he would shorten them still a couple more. Experience

has taught him the peculiar uses of each position.

Some writers claim that one seat ought to suffice for all occasions.

And so it can be made to do. This one seat may, however, not always be

the best adapted to the work immediately in hand, or to the animal

ridden. A slight change is often a gain. Every one has noticed that

different horses, as well as different ground ridden over, vary the

rider's seat in the same saddle.

But excellent as is the long hunting-seat in its place, one can

conceive no more ridiculous sight than the English swell I once saw in

Colorado, who had brought his own pigskin with him, and started out

for a ten days' ride across the prairie on an Indian pony, the only

available mount. The pony's short gait was admirable for a long day's

jaunt in a peaked saddle, but so little suited to a cross-country rig,

that the swell's condition at the end of the first fifty miles must

have been pitiable. This unusual "tenderfoot" exhibition elicited a

deal of very natural laughter, and its butt, who was an excellent but

narrow-minded horseman, though he stuck with square-toed British pluck

to his rig for a few days, came back to Denver equipped _a la_ cowboy.

His Piccadilly saddle had been abandoned to the prairie-dogs.

III.

Patroclus watches his rider's mood. He has become contemplative too,

and has taken kindly to our sober pace. But you shall have your turn,

my glossy pet. Let us get off this macadamized road where we can find

some cantering ground.

As I shorten the reins, 'tis indeed a pleasure to see your head come

up, neck arched, eye brightening, alternate ears moving back to catch

your master's word, feet at once gathered under you, and nerves and

muscles on keenest tension. Every motion is springy, elastic, bold,

and free, as full of power as it is of ease. No wonder, Patroclus,

that eyes so often turn to watch you. No wonder that you seem

conscious that they do. For though we both know that the first test of

the horse is performance, yet having that, there is pleasure to us

both in your graceful gaits.

To give the reins the least possible shake will send you into the most

ecstatic of running walks, as fast as one needs to go, and so easy

that it is a constant wonder how you do it. This is no common amble or

bumping pace, but the true four beat rack. And as you toss your head

and champ your bit, Patroclus, with the pleasure of your accelerated

motion, how well you seem to know the comfort of your rider.

IV.

This running walk or rack, by the way, is one of the most delightful

of gaits. Its universal adoption in the South by every one who can buy

a racker is due to the roads, which, for many months of the year, are

so utterly impassable that you have to pick your way in and out of the

woods and fields on either side, and rarely meet a stretch where you

can start into a swinging trot. But a horse will fall from a walk into

a rack, or _vice versa_, with the greatest of ease to himself and

rider, and if the stretch is but a hundred yards will gain some

distance in that short bit of ground. If you have a fifty mile ride

over good roads in comfortable weather, perhaps a smart trot, if easy,

of course alternating with the walk, is as good a single gait as you

can ride. But you need to trot or canter a goodly stretch, not to

shorten rein at every dozen rods, for the transition from a walk to

either of these gaits or back again, though slight, is still an

exertion; while from the walk to the rack and back the change is so

imperceptible that one is made conscious of it only by the patter of

the horse's feet. Here again, the country's need, roads, and climate

have bred a most acceptable gait. But it has made the Southerner

forget what an inspiriting thing a swinging twelve-mile trot can be

along a smooth and pretty road; and you cannot give away a trotting

horse for use in the saddle south of Mason and Dixon. The rack soon

grows into the single-foot, which only differs from it in being

faster, and the latter is substituted for the trot. To go a six or

eight mile gait, holding a full glass of water in the hand, and not to

spill a drop, is the test of perfection in the racker. And for a lazy

feeling day, or for hot weather, anywhere, it is the acme of comfort.

Or it is, indeed, a useful gait in winter, when it is too cold for a

clipped horse to walk and your nag has yet not stretched his legs

enough to want to go at sharper speed. It must, however, be

acknowledged that it is very rare that a horse will rack perfectly as

well as trot. He is apt to get the gaits mixed.

A rack is half way between a pace and a trot. In the pace, the two

feet of each side move and come down together; in the trot, the two

alternate feet do so. In the running walk, or in the single-foot, each

hind foot follows its leader at the half interval, no two feet coming

to the ground together, but in regular succession, so as to produce

just twice as many foot-falls as a trot or a pace. Hence the _one_,

_two_, _three_, _four_, patter of the horse gives to the ear the

impression of very great rapidity, when really moving at only half the

apparent speed. The result of the step is a swaying, easy back, which

you can sit with as much ease as a walk. Rackers will go a six-mile

gait, single-footers much faster. I once owned a single-footing mare,

who came from Alexander's farm and was sired by Norman, who could

single-foot a full mile in three minutes. As a rule, the speed is not

much more than half that rate. And either a rack or single-foot is apt

to spoil the square trot; or if you break a horse to trot, you will

lose the other gaits. A perfect all-day racker or a speedy

single-footer can scarcely be aught else.

V.

I did not mean to apply that rule to you, Patroclus! We both of us

know better. For the exceptional horse can learn to rack or

single-foot without detriment to his other paces, if he be not kept

upon these gaits too long at any time.

Half a mile ahead of us is the little grass-grown lane, where we can

indulge in a canter or a frolicsome gallop. Shall we quicken our speed

a trifle? Simply a "Trot, Pat!" and on the second step you fall into

as square and level a trot as ever horse could boast. I know how

quickly you obey my voice, old boy, and but one step from my word I am

ready to catch the first rise, and without the semblance of a jar we

are in a full sharp trot. How I love to look over your shoulder,

Patroclus, and see your broad, flat knee come swinging up, and showing

at every step its bony angles beyond the point of your shoulder;

though, indeed, your shoulder is so slanting that the saddle sits well

back, and your rider is too old a soldier to lean much to his trot.

And you will go six to--I had almost said sixteen--miles an hour at

this gait, nor vary an ounce of pressure on your velvety mouth. How is

it, Patroclus, that you catch the meaning of my hands so readily?

VI.

The fancy of to-day is for the daisy-clipping thoroughbred. And when

they do not run to the knife-blade pattern, they may be the finest

mounts a man can throw his leg across. But my fancy for the road has

always been for the higher stepping half-bred. Granted that on the

turf or across a flying country blood will tell. Granted that

brilliant knee action is mainly ornamental. Still, in America, the

half-bred will average much better in looks, and vastly more

satisfactory in hardy service. Where shall we again find the

equivalent of the Morgan breed, now all but lost in the desire to get

the typical running horse? For saddle work, and the very best of its

kind, there was never a finer pattern than the Morgan. Alas, that we

have allowed him to disappear! His worth would soon come to the fore

in these days of saddle pleasures. The thoroughbred's characteristic

is ability to perform prodigies of speed and endurance at exceptional

times. But the strong, every-day-in-the-year good performer is usually

no more than half-bred, if even that. Moreover, you can find a hundred

daisy-clippers for one proud stepper, be he thoroughbred or galloway.

There is such a thing as waste of action. No one wants to straddle a

black Hanoverian out of a hearse. But the horse who steps high may be

as good a stayer as the one who does not, and high action is a beauty

which delights men's eyes and opens their purses. Because the long

stride of the turf is better for being low, it is not safe to apply

this rule to the road.

There are many more worthless brutes among thoroughbreds than among

the common herd. While it is easy to acknowledge that the perfect

thoroughbred excels all other horses, the fact must also be noted that

he is of extremest rarity, and even when found is infrequently up to

weight. If we use the word advisedly, only the horse registered in the

Stud Book is a thoroughbred. These have no early training whatever,

except to allow themselves to be mounted, and to run their best. If

they stand the initial test of speed, they are reserved for the turf,

and there wholly spoiled for the saddle or for any other purpose of

pleasure. If they do not, they are turned adrift, half spoiled in

mouth and manners by tricky stable-boys, and may or may not fall into

good hands. For one thoroughbred with perfect manners, sound, and up

to weight, there are a score of really good half-breds, as near

perfection as their owners choose or are able to make them.

What we in America are apt colloquially to call a thoroughbred is only

a horse which, in his looks, shows some decided infusion of good

blood, or is sired by a well-bred horse. But it is to be remembered

that of two horses with an equal strain of pure blood, one may have

reverted to a coarse physical type, and the other to the finer. And

the one who has inherited the undeniable stamp of the common-bred

ancestor may also have inherited from the other side those qualities

of constitution, courage, intelligence, and speed, which sum up the

value of high English blood. Not one fine-bred horse in one hundred--I

speak from the ownership of, and daily personal intimacy for

considerable periods with, over fifty good saddle beasts,--has as many

of the admirable qualities of pure blood as Patroclus. And yet (_absit

omen_), he has a wave in his tail, and though his feet and legs are

perfect in shape, and as clean as a colt's, they are far beyond the

thoroughbred's in size. He shows that his ancestry runs back both to

the desert and the plough. In America, surely, handsome is that

handsome does. Let us value good blood for its qualities, not looks,

and ride serviceable half-breds, instead of sporting worthless weeds

because they approach to the clothes-horse pattern, or have necks like

camels.

VII.

One of the most distinctly promising features of the athletic

tendencies of to-day is the mania for the saddle. Fifteen years ago,

the boys along the Boston streets used to hoot at your master,

Patroclus. Not, indeed, that he had a poor seat or needed to "get

inside and pull down the blinds," as the London cad might phrase it,

for a good or bad seat was all alike to them; rather at the wholly

unusual sight of a man on horseback--outside of politics.

But the number of good horsemen, and horsewomen too, is growing every

day. Here comes a couple at a brisk round trot. How can we notice the

lad, Patroclus, when the lassie looks so sweetly? In her neat habit,

with dainty protruding foot and ankle, sitting her trappy-gaited mount

with ease and grace, the bloom of health fairly dazzling you as she

rushes by, so that you doubt whether it be her pretty eye and white

teeth or her ruddy skin and happy face which has set even your ancient

heart a-throbbing, how can a woman look more attractive?

[Illustration: PLATE IV.

A SHARP SINGLE-FOOT.]

But the alluring sight is not long-lived. Following hard upon them

comes, not the first rider who has chased a petticoat, a young

Anglomaniac. He fancies that his hunting-crop, his immaculate rig, and

his elbows out-Britishing the worst of British snobs, as he leans far

over his pommel, make him a pattern rider. You can see the daylight

under his knees. A sudden plunge would send him, Lord knows where!

Haply his dock-tailed plug remembers the shafts full well and steadily

plods ahead. But bless his little dudish heart! he will learn better.

As his months in the saddle increase, he will find his seat as well as

his place. We Americans are the making of an excellent race of

horsemen. It is a pleasure to see the increase in the number of

promising riders who seek the western suburbs every day. We shall all

ride, as we manage to do everything, well,--after a while. There is of

course a lot of rubbish and imported--rot, shall we call it? But what

odds? so there is in art, music, politics, religion.

VIII.

You see the corner of the lane, Patroclus, while I have been thus

musing, and your lively ear and instinctively quickened gait rouse my

half-dazed thoughts. Here we are. Shall we take our accustomed canter?

You always wait the word, though you are eagerness itself, for you do

not yet know when I want you to start, or which foot I may ask you to

lead with. Though, indeed, you will sometimes prance a bit, and change

step in the alternate graceful bounds of the passage, to invite and

urge my choice. The least pressure of one leg, and off you go, leading

with the opposite shoulder. And you will keep this foot by the mile,

Patroclus, or change at every second step, should I ask you so to do.

You need but the slightest monition of my leg, and instantly your

other shoulder takes the lead. I see you want to gallop, boy! But not

quite yet. You must not forget that you have been taught, as they say

in Kentucky, to canter all day long in the shade of an apple tree, if

so be it your master wishes. You shall have your gallop anon. But you

must never forget that a horse who can only walk or go a twelve-mile

trot or hand-gallop, though he may lead the hunt cross-country, is an

unmitigated nuisance on the road. Slow and easy gaits are as valuable

to the park-hack as long wind and speed to the racer. And although

Boston, as yet, boasts no Rotten Row, are not the daily rides through

its exquisite environments the equivalent of the canter in that justly

celebrated resort, rather than the mere country tramp upon a handy

roadster or the ride to cover on a rapid covert-hack? And yet our

imitation of our British cousins has approximated less to the pleasure

ride than to the cross-country style. Perhaps, in our eagerness to

convince ourselves that we have learned all there is worth knowing in

the art, we have aped what is confessedly the finest of horseback

sports, and forgotten the more moderate fashion of Hyde Park. Let us

remember that we can saunter on the road every day, while riding to

hounds is for most of us a rarish luxury.

IX.

Because a horse can go well to hounds, it does not follow that he is

fit for park or road work any more than the three-year-old who wins

the Derby or St. Leger is fitted for a palfrey. A horse whose business

it is to run and jump must have his head; while a horse, to be a

clever and agreeable hack, should learn that the bit is a limitation

of his action, and that the slightest movement of the hand or leg of

the rider has its meaning. What is impossible in galloping over

ploughed fields is essential to comfort on the road. In the field,

everything must be subservient to saving the horse; the rider's

comfort is the rule of the park. It is every day that we may see a

rider who deems his excellent hunter a good saddle beast, when,

however clever cross-country, he is absolutely ignorant of the first

elements of the _manege_. He forgets that each is perfect in his

own place and may be useless in the other's.

I am the owner of a fine-bred mare, whom I have as yet had no

opportunity to school. She is the perfect type of a twelve-stone

hunter. After hounds she will attract the eye of the whole field for

distinguished beauty, and ridden up to her capacity, can always be in

the first flight. She has speed, endurance, and fine disposition, is

as sound and hardy as a hickory stick, and in her place unsurpassed.

Almost any of the horsemen of to-day's Modern Athens would select this

mare in preference to Patroclus. And yet, a four-in-hand of her type,

as she now is, Tantivy coach thrown in for make-weight, are not worth

one Patroclus for real saddle work, because she has no conception of

moderate gaits. She is bound to go twelve miles an hour if you let her

out of a walk, or fret at the restraint. I can ride Patroclus

twenty-five miles without fatigue. If I ride the mare ten miles, I

come in tired, drenched with heat, and probably with my temper

somewhat ruffled, while she has fretted to a lather more than once,

and we have both been so hot during the entire ride that, if the day

is raw, it has been dangerous to ease into a walk. If I ride Patroclus

over the same ground in the same time, we shall both come in fresh as

a daisy, dry, and each well-pleased with the other. While this mare

can gallop fast and is easy and kind, a man must work his passage to

make her canter a six-mile gait. She has no more ambition than

Patroclus, but she does not curb it to the will of her rider. With a

knowledge of all which, however, most of our young swells would select

the mare for simple road-riding, because she looks so like a

thoroughbred hunter, and rather suggests the impression that they

habitually ride to hounds. As well saunter in the park in a pink coat

and with "tops carefully dressed to the color of Old Cheddar."

X.

The _manege_ need not mean all the little refinements of training

which, however delightful to the initiated, are unnecessary to comfort

or safety. But no horse can be called a good saddle beast whose

forehand and croup will not yield at once to the lightest pressure

of rein or leg. Most horses will swing their forehands with some

readiness, if not in a well-balanced manner. But not many are taught

to swing the croup at all; very few can do so handily. The perfect

saddle horse should be able to swing his croup about in a complete

circle, of which one fore foot is the immovable centre, or his

forehand about the proper hind foot, in either direction at will. He

should come "in hand," that is, gather his legs well under him, so as

to be on a perfect balance the moment you take up the reins and close

your legs upon him. He should in the canter or gallop start with

either foot leading, or instantly change foot in motion at the will of

his rider. He should have easy, handy gaits, the more the better, if

he can keep them distinct and true. These accomplishments, added to

a light mouth and a temper of equal courage and moderation, or, in

short, "manners," make that rare creature,--the perfect saddle horse.

It is in this that the English err. In their perfect development of

the hunter and the racer they neglect the training of the hack. Though

it be heresy to the mania of the day to say so, it is none the less

true that while you seek your bold as well as discreet and experienced

cross-country rider in England, you must go to the Continent, or among

the British cavalry, to find your accomplished horseman.

It is the general impression among men who ride to hounds, and still

more among men who pretend to do so, that leaping is the _ultima

thule_ of equestrianism; and that a man who can sit a horse over a

four-foot hurdle has graduated in the art of horsemanship. The

corollary to this error is also an article of faith among men who

hunt, that is, that no other class of riders can leap their horses

boldly and well. But both ideas are as strange as they are mistaken.

The cavalry of Prussia, Austria, and Italy show the finest of

horsemanship. More than a quarter century ago, the author spent three

years in Berlin under the tuition of a retired major-general of the

Prussian army, and saw a great deal of the daily inside life, as well

as the exceptional parade life, of the army. He has often seen a

column of cavalry, with sabres drawn, ride across water which would

bring half the Myopia Hunt to a stand-still on an ordinary run after

hounds. Why should not men whose business it is to ride, do so well?

Think you there was not good horsemanship at Vionville, when von

Bredow (one of the author's old school friends, by the way) with his

six squadrons, to enable Bruddenbrock to hold his position till the

reinforcements of the Tenth Corps could reach him, rode into the

centre of the Sixth French Corps d'Armee? In slender line, he and his

men, three squadrons of the Seventh Cuirassiers, and three of the

Sixteenth Uhlans, charged over the French artillery in the first line,

the French infantry in line of battle, and reached the mitrailleuses

and reserves in the rear, where they sabred the gunners at their guns.

What though but thirteen officers and one hundred and fifty men out of

near a thousand returned from that gallant ride? Though no Tennyson

has sung their glorious deed, though we forget the willing courage

with which they faced a certain sacrifice for the sake of duty to the

Fatherland, think you those men rode not well, as a mere act of

horsemanship?

Think you that the handful of men of the Eighth Pennsylvania, at

Chancellorsville, when they charged down upon Stonewall Jackson's

victorious and elated legions, riding in column through the chapparal

and over the fallen timber of the Wilderness, carving their path

through thousands of the best troops who ever followed gallant leader,

sat not firmly in their saddles? Think you that the men who followed

Sheridan in many a gallant charge, or Fitz Hugh Lee, forsooth, could

not ride as well as the best of us across a bit of turf, with a modest

wall now and then to lend its zest to the pleasure? Neither we nor our

British cousins can monopolize all the virtue of the world, even in

the art equestrian.

Patroclus and Penelope: A Chat in the Saddle · 第 1 / 8 段