FOOTNOTES:

[1] For biographical details see DESCARTES; MALEBRANCHE; SPINOZA.

[2] _Resp. ad secundas objectiones_, p. 74,--quoting from the Elzevir

edition.

[3] _Resp. ad tertias object_, p. 94.

[4] _Meditatio tertia_, p. 21.

[5] _Resp. quartae_, p. 234.

[6] _Meditatio quarta_, p. 26.

[7] _Resp. ad sec. object._ p. 75.

[8] _Resp. ad sec. object._ pp. 72-73.

[9] _Resp. Sextae_, 160-163.

[10] _Principia_, i. 35.

[11] _Notae in Programma_, p. 184.

[12] _Epistolae_, i. 110.

[13] _Resp. Sextae_, pp. 165-166.

[14] _Epist_. i. 66, 67.

[15] _Princ._ i. 60.

[16] _Morale_, i. I, S 2.

[17] _Recherche_, iii. pt. ii. ch. vi.

[18] _Recherche_, ch. vii.

[19] _Recherche_, ch. i.

[20] _Morale_, i. 2, S 5.

[21] _Entretien_. i. S 5.

[22] _Recherche_, iii. pt. ii ch. vii., S 4.

[23] _Recherche_, ch. ix.

[24] _Recherche_, i. pt. i. ch. i.

[25] _Recherche_, i. pt. i. ch. iv.

[26] _Recherche_, iv. ch. i.

[27] _Entretien_, iv.

[28] _Recherche_, v. ch. iv.

[29] _Recherche_, iv. ch. i.

[30] _Morale_, pt. i. ch. i. S 9.

[31] _Recherche_, iv. ch. v.

[32] _Eth._ ii. schol. 7.

[33] _Eth._ i. schol. 29.

[34] _De Emend._ viii. S 38.

[35] _Eth._ ii. lemma, 7 schol.

[36] _Eth._ iv. 3.

[37] _Eth._ ii. 40, schol. 2.

[38] _De Emend._ vii. S 42.

[39] _Eth._ ii. schol. 10.

[40] _Epist._ 32.

[41] _Epist._ 27.

[42] _Eth._ ii. 7.

[43] _Epist._ 27.

[44] _Eth._ i. schol. 17.

[45] _Tractatus de Deo et homine._ ii. 19.

[46] _Epist._ 29, 70.

[47] _Eth._ i. schol. 17.

[48] _Eth._ iv. schol. 22.

[49] _Eth._ iii. 6, 7.

[50] _Eth._ iii. 9.

[51] _Eth._ iii. Def. Affect. 1.

[52] _Eth._ ii. 49.

[53] _Eth._ ii. 45.

[54] _Eth._ iv. 1.

[55] _Eth._ iv. schol. 45.

[56] _Eth._ iv. 67.

[57] _Epist._ 57.

[58] _Epist._ 21.

[59] _Eth._ v. 36.

CARTHAGE (Phoenician _Kart-hadshat_, "New City"; Gr. [Greek: Karchedon],

Lat. _Carthago_ or _Carchedon_), one of the most famous cities of

antiquity, on the north coast of Africa; it was founded about 822 B.C.

by the Phoenicians, destroyed for the first time by the Romans in 146

B.C., rebuilt by the Romans, and finally destroyed by the Arabs in A.D.

698. It was situated in the heart of the Sinus Uticensis (mod. Gulf of

Tunis), which is protected on the west by the promontory of Apollo (mod.

Ras Ali el Mekki), and on the east by the promontory of Mercury or Cape

Bon (mod. Ras Addar). Its position naturally formed a sort of bastion on

the inner curve of the bay between the Lake of Tunis on the south and

the marshy plain of Utica (Sukhara) on the north. Cape Gamart, the Arab

village of Sidi-bu-Said and the small harbour of Goletta (La Goulette,

Halk el Wad) form a triangle which represents the area of Carthage at

its greatest, including its extramural suburbs. Of this area the highest

point is Sidi-bu-Said, which stands on a lofty cliff about 490 ft. high.

On Cape Gamart (Kamart) was the chief cemetery; the citadel, Byrsa, was

on the hill on which to-day stand the convent of Les Peres Blancs (White

Fathers) and the cathedral of St Louis. The harbours lay about

three-fifths of a mile south of Byrsa, near the modern hospital of the

Khram, at Cartagenna. The tongue of land, which runs from the harbours

as far as Goletta, to the mouth of the Catadas which connects the Lake

of Tunis with the sea, was known as _taenia_ (ribbon, band) or _ligula_

(diminutive of _lingua_, tongue). The isthmus connecting the peninsula

of Carthage with the mainland was roughly estimated by Polybius as 25

stades (about 15,000 ft.); the peninsula itself, according to Strabo,

had a circumference of 360 stades (41 m.). The distance between Gamart

and Goletta is about 6 m.

From Byrsa, which is only 195 ft. above the sea, there is a fine view;

thence it is possible to see how Carthage was able at once to dominate

the sea and the gently undulating plains which stretch westward as far

as Tunis and the line of the river Bagradas (mod. Mejerda). On the

horizon, on the other side of the Gulf of Tunis, rise the chief heights

of the mountain-chain which was the scene of so many fierce struggles

between Carthage and Rome, between Rome and the Vandals:--the Bu-Kornain

("Two-Horned Mountain"), crowned by the ruins of the temple of Saturn

Balcaranensis; Jebel Ressas, behind which lie the ruins of Neferis;

Zaghwan, the highest point in Zeugitana; Hammam-Lif, Rades (Ghades,

Gades, the ancient Maxula) on the coast, and 10 m. to the south-west the

"white" Tunis ([Greek: Leukos Tunes] of Diodorus) and the fertile hills

of Ariana. All round Byrsa, alike on the plain and on the slopes, are

fields of barley, vineyards and patches of cactus, interrupted only by

huge heaps of rubbish and excavation-mounds, the haunts of green

lizards, and by houses and villages built of materials drawn for many a

century from the ancient ruins.

The ancient harbours were distinguished as the military and the

commercial. The remains of the latter are to be seen in a partially

ruined artificial lagoon which originally, according to Beule, had an

area of nearly 60 acres; there were, however, in addition a large quay

for unloading freight along the shore, and huge basins or outer harbours

protected by jetties, the remains of which are still visible at the

water-level. The military harbour, known as Cothon, communicated with

the commercial by means of a canal now partially ruined; it was circular

in shape, surrounded by large docks 16-1/4 ft. wide, and capable of holding

220 vessels, though its area was only some 22 acres. In the centre was

an islet from which the admiral could inspect the whole fleet.[1]

Among the other ruins which have been identified are the circus or

hippodrome, traversed by the railway at the north of the village of

Duar-es-Shat; the forum, between Cothon and Byrsa, where stood the

Curia, the regular place of assembly of the senate, and near which were

the moneychangers' shops, the tribunal, the temple of Apollo, and in the

Byzantine period the baths of Theodora. Three main streets led from the

forum to Byrsa.

The hill of St Louis, the ancient citadel of Byrsa, has a circuit of

4525 ft. It appears to have been surrounded at least at certain points

by several lines of fortifications. It was, however, dismantled by P.

Scipio Africanus the younger, in 146 B.C., and was only refortified by

Theodosius II. in A.D. 424; subsequently its walls were again renewed by

Belisarius in 553. On the plateau of Byrsa have been found the most

ancient of the Punic tombs, huge cisterns in the eastern part, and near

the chapel of St Louis the foundations of the famous temple of Eshmun

(see below), and the palace of the Roman proconsul.

About 325 ft. from the railway station of La Malga are the still

imposing ruins of the amphitheatre. Near by, at the spot called Bir el

Jebana, Pere Delattre has discovered four cemeteries, one of which

contains the tombs of state officials or servants of the imperial

government. Rather more than half a mile north-west of Byrsa are the

huge cisterns of La Malga, which, at the time of the Arab geographer,

Idrisi, still comprised twenty-four parallel covered reservoirs, 325 ft.

by 71-1/2 ft.; of these fourteen only remain.

On the hill of the Petit Seminaire, which is separated from Byrsa by a

valley, Pere Delattre has discovered a Christian basilica, the baths of

Gargilius, large graves with several levels of tombs, and much debris of

sculpture, which, however, is insufficient to enable us to say that this

is the site of the temple of Tanit or Juno Caelestis. The quarter of

Dermeche, near the sea, whose name recalls the Latin _Thermis_ or

_Thermas_, is remarkable for the imposing remains of the baths

(_thermae_) of Antoninus. In one place called Douimes was the Ceramicus

where excavation has discovered a graceful basilica, proto-Punic tombs,

potters' ovens with numerous terra-cotta moulds which were abandoned

after the siege in 146 B.C., and finally a Roman palace with superb

marble statues. Farther on are huge reservoirs of Borj-Jedid which are

sufficiently well-preserved to be used again.

Behind the small fort of Borj-Jedid is the plateau of the Odeum where

the theatre and fine marble statues of the Roman period have been laid

bare; beyond is the great Christian basilica of Damus-el-Karita (perhaps

a corruption of _Domus Caritatis_); in the direction of Sidi-bu-Said is

the _platea nova_, the huge stairway of which, like so many other

Carthaginian buildings, has of late years been destroyed by the Arabs

for use as building material; on the coast near St Monica is the

necropolis of Rabs where Delattre dug up fine anthropoid sarcophagi of

the Punic period.

In the quarter of Megara (Magaria, mod. La Marsa) it would seem that

there never were more than isolated buildings, villas in the midst of

gardens. At Jebel Khaui (Cape Kamart) there is a great necropolis, the

sepulchral chambers of which were long ago rifled by Arabs and Vandals.

This cemetery had a Jewish quarter.

We must mention finally the gigantic remains in the western plain of the

Roman aqueduct which carried water from Jebel Zaghwan (_Mons

Zeugitanus_) and Juggar (Zucchara) to the cisterns of La Malga. From the

_nymphaeum_ of Zaghwan to Carthage this aqueduct is 61 Roman miles

(about 56 English miles) long; in the plain of Manuba its arches are

nearly 49 ft. high.

Though several famous travellers visited and described the ruins of

Carthage during the first thirty years of the 19th century, such as

Major Humbert, Chateaubriand, Estrup, no scientific investigations

took place till 1833. In that year Captain Falbe, Danish consul at

Tunis, made a plan of the ruins so far as they were visible. In 1837

there was formed in Paris, on the initiative of Dureau de la Malle, a

_Societe pour les fouilles de Carthage_; under the auspices of this

body Falbe and Sir Grenville Temple undertook researches, and a little

later Sir Thomas Read, English consul, following the example of the

Genoese and the Pisans, carried away to England the mosaics, columns

and statues of the baths of Antoninus. The Abbe Bourgade, chaplain of

the church of St Louis erected in 1841, collected together Punic

stelae and other antiquities from the surrounding plain; these formed

the nucleus of the magnificent museum subsequently formed by Pere

Delattre at the instigation of Cardinal Lavigerie. Between 1856 and

1858 Nathan Davis made excavations on the supposed site of the Odeum,

and in 1859 Beule undertook his celebrated investigations on Byrsa.

Among other explorers were A. Daux in 1866; von Maltzan in 1870; E. de

Sainte-Marie in 1874; Ch. d'Herisson in 1883; E. Babelon and S.

Reinach in 1884; Vernaz in 1885; Gauckler in 1903. Of these the

majority were sent officially by the French government. But their

attempts were partial, disjointed and without any systematic plan;

they were entirely superseded by the brilliant and persevering work of

R.P. Delattre. The Musee Lavigerie, the result of his labours,

contains a vast archaeological treasure, the interest of which is

doubled by the fact that it stands in the very midst of the ancient

site. Unfortunately Delattre's work suffered too often from the

absence of a cordial understanding with the directors of the

antiquities department, La Blanchere and P. Gauckler, who, having

themselves undertaken excavations, transported their finds to the

Bardo museum, by the help of the public funds at their disposal.

The main authority for the topography and the history of the

excavations is Aug. Audollent's _Carthage romaine_ (Paris, 1901). A

topographical and archaeological map of the site was published under

the direction of Colonel Dolot and with the assistance of Delattre and

Gauckler by the Ministere de l'Instruction Publique in 1907.

_History._--The history of Carthage falls into four periods: (1) from

the foundation to the beginning of the wars with the Sicilian Greeks in

550 B.C.; (2) from 550 to 265, the first year of the Punic Wars; (3) the

Punic Wars to the fall of Carthage in 146 B.C.; (4) the periods of

Roman and Byzantine rule down to the destruction of the city by the

Arabs in A.D. 698.

(1) _Foundation to 550 B.C._--From an extremely remote period Phoenician

sailors had visited the African coast and had had commercial relations

with the Libyan tribes who inhabited the district which forms the modern

Tunis. In the 16th century B.C. the Sidonians already had trading

stations on the coast; with the object of competing with the Tyrian

colony at Utica they established a trading station called Cambe or

Caccabe on the very site afterwards occupied by Carthage. Near

Borj-Jedid unmistakable traces of this early settlement have been found,

though nothing is known of its history. According to the classical

tradition Carthage was founded about 850 B.C. by Tyrian emigrants led by

Elissa or Elissar, the daughter of the Tyrian king Mutton I., fleeing

from the tyranny of her brother Pygmalion. According to the story,

Elissa subsequently received the name of Dido, i.e. "the fugitive."

Cambe welcomed the new arrivals, who bought from the mixed

Libyo-Phoenician peoples of the neighbourhood, tributaries of the Libyan

king Japon, a piece of land on which to build a "new city,"

_Kart-hadshat_, the Greek and Roman forms of the name. The story goes

that Dido, having obtained "as much land as could be contained by the

skin of an ox," proceeded to cut the skin of a slain ox into strips

narrow enough to extend round the whole of the hill, which afterwards

from this episode gained the name of _Byrsa_. This last detail obviously

arose from a mere play on words by which [Greek: Bursa] "hide," "skin,"

is confused with the Phoenician _bosra, borsa_, "citadel," "fortress."

In memory of its Tyrian origin, Carthage paid an annual tribute to the

temple of Melkarth at Tyr, and under the Roman empire coins were struck

showing Dido fleeing in a galley, or presiding over the building of

Byrsa. On the Vatican _Virgil_ there is a representation in miniature of

workmen shaping marble blocks and columns for Dido's palace.

The early history of Carthage is very obscure. It is only in the 6th

century that real history begins. By this time the city is

unquestionably a considerable capital with a domain divided into the

three districts of Zeugitana (the environs of Carthage and the peninsula

of C. Bon), Byzacium (the shore of the Syrtes), and the third comprising

the emporia which stretch in the form of a crescent to the centre of the

Great Syrtis as far as Cyrenaica. The first contest against the Greeks

arose from a boundary question between the settlements of Carthage and

those of the Greeks of Cyrene. The limits were eventually fixed and

marked by a monument known as the "Altar of Philenae." The destruction

of Tyre by Nebuchadrezzar (q.v.), in the first half of the 6th century,

enabled Carthage to take its place as mistress of the Mediterranean. The

Phoenician colonies founded by Tyre and Sidon in Sicily and Spain,

threatened by the Greeks, sought help from Carthage, and from this

period dates the Punic[2] supremacy in the western Mediterranean. The

Greek colonization of Sicily was checked, while Carthage established

herself on all the Sicilian coast and the neighbouring islands as far as

the Balearic Islands and the coast of Spain. The inevitable conflict

between Greece and Carthage broke out about 550.

(2) _Wars with the Greeks._--In 550, the Carthaginians, led by the

suffetes Malchus, conquered almost all Sicily and expelled the Greeks.

In 536 they defeated the Phocaeans and the Massaliotes before Alalia on

the Corsican coast. But Malchus, having failed in Sardinia, was banished

by the stern Carthaginian senate and swore to avenge himself. He laid

siege to Carthage itself, and, after having sacrificed his son Carthalo

to his lust for vengeance, entered the city as a victor. He ruled until

he was put to death by the party which had supported him. Mago, son of

Hanno, succeeded Malchus, as suffetes and general-in-chief. He was the

true founder of the Carthaginian military power. He conquered Sardinia

and the Balearic Islands, where he founded Port Mahon (Portus Magonis),

and so increased the power of Carthage that he was able to force

commercial treaties upon the Etruscans, and the Greeks of both Sicily

and Italy. The first agreement between Carthage and Rome was made in

509, one year after the expulsion of the Tarquins, in the consulship of

Junius Brutus and Marcus Horatius. The text is preserved by Polybius

(_Hist._ iii. 22-23). It assigned Italy to the Romans and the African

waters to Carthage, but left Sicily as a dangerous neutral zone.

Mago was succeeded as commander-in-chief by his elder son Hasdrubal (c.

500), who was thrice chosen suffetes; he died in Sardinia about 485. His

brother Hamilcar, having collected a fleet of 200 galleys for the

conquest of Sicily, was defeated by the combined forces of Gelo of

Syracuse and Theron of Agrigentum under the walls of Himera in 480, the

year in which the Persian fleet was defeated at Salamis (some say the

two battles were simultaneous); it is said that 150,000 Carthaginians

were taken prisoners. The victory is celebrated by Pindar (_Pyth._ i.).

These two leaders of the powerful house of the Barcidae each left three

sons. Those of Hasdrubal were Hannibal, Hasdrubal and Sapho; those of

Hamilcar, Himilco, Hanno and Gisco. All, under various titles, succeeded

to the authority which it had already enjoyed. About 460 Hanno,[3]

passing beyond the Pillars of Hercules (Straits of Gibraltar), founded

settlements along the West African coast in the modern Senegal and

Guinea, and even in Madeira and the Canary Islands.

In Sicily the war lasted for a century with varying success. In 406

Hannibal and Himilco destroyed Agrigentum and threatened Gela, but the

Carthaginians were forced back on their strongholds in the south-west by

Dionysius the Elder, Dionysius the Younger, Timoleon and Agathocles

successively, whose cause was aided by a terrible plague and civil

troubles in Carthage itself, A certain Hanno, unquestionably of the

Barcide house, attempted to seize the supreme power, but his partisans

were overwhelmed and he himself suffered the most cruel punishment.

Profiting by these troubles, Timoleon defeated the Carthaginians at

Crimissus in 340, and compelled them to sue for peace. This peace was

not of long duration; Agathocles crossed to Africa and besieged

Carthage, which was then handicapped by the conspiracy of Bomilcar.

Bomilcar was crucified, and Agathocles having been obliged to return to

Sicily, his general Eumarcus was compelled to carry his army out of

Africa, where it had maintained itself for three years (August 310 to

October 307). After the death of Agathocles, the Carthaginians

re-established their supremacy in Sicily, and Mago even offered

assistance to Rome against the invasion of Pyrrhus (480). Pyrrhus

crossed to Sicily in 277, and was preparing to emulate Agathocles by

sailing to Africa when he was compelled to return to Italy (see SICILY:

_History_).

Delivered from these dangers and more arrogant than before, Carthage

claimed the monopoly of Mediterranean waters, and seized every foreign

ship found between Sardinia and the Pillars of Hercules. "At Carthage,"

said Polybius, "no one is blamed, however he may have acquired his

wealth." The sailors took the utmost care to conceal the routes which

they followed; there is a story that a Carthaginian ship, pursued by a

Roman galley as far as the Atlantic, preferred to be driven out of her

course and sunk rather than reveal the course to the Cassiterides,

whither she was bound in quest of tin. The owner being saved, the senate

made good his losses from the public treasury (Strabo, iii. 5. 11).

(3) _Wars with Rome._[4]--The first Punic War lasted twenty-seven years

(268-241); it was fought by Carthage for the defence of her Sicilian

possessions and her supremacy in the Tyrrhenian Sea. The Romans,

victorious at the naval battles of Mylae (Melazzo) and Ecnomus (260 and

256), sent M. Atilius Regulus with an army to Africa. But the

Carthaginians, by the help of the Spartan Xanthippus, were successful,

and Regulus was captured. The fighting was then transferred to Sicily,

where Hasdrubal was defeated at Panormus (250); subsequently the Romans

failed before Lilybaeum and were defeated at Drepanum, but their victory

at the Aegates Islands ended the war (241). Carthage now desired to

disband her forces, but the mercenaries claimed their arrears of pay,

and on being refused revolted under Spendius and Matho, pillaged the

suburbs of Carthage and laid siege to the city itself. Only the genius

of Hamilcar Barca raised the siege; the mercenaries were caught in the

defile of the Axe, where they were cut down without mercy. This war,

which all but ruined Carthage, is known to the Roman historians as the

_bellum inexpiabile._

This peril averted, Carthage undertook the conquest of Spain. It was the

work of Hamilcar, and lasted nine years up to the day of Hamilcar's

death, sword in hand, in 228. His son-in-law, Hasdrubal Pulcher, built

Carthagena in 227 and concluded with Rome a treaty by which the Ebro was

adopted as the boundary of the Carthaginian sphere. On his death the

soldiers chose for themselves as leader Hannibal, son of Hamilcar. At

this period Carthage, with a population of perhaps 1,000,000, was in the

enjoyment of extraordinary prosperity alike in its internal industries

and in its foreign trade. The manufacture of woven goods, especially,

was a flourishing industry; the Greek writer Polemo records a special

treaty dealing with Carthaginian fabrics which were a recognized luxury

throughout the ancient world. In Sicily, Italy and Greece the

Carthaginians sold especially black slaves, ivory, metals, precious

stones and all the products of Central Africa, which came thence by

caravan. In Spain they sought copper and silver, and it was by them that

the modern mines of Huelva, as also those of Osca and Carthagena, were

first exploited. The district round Carthage, with its amazing

fertility, was the granary of the city, as it was later that of Rome.

Mago had drawn up a treaty dealing with agriculture and' rural economy

generally, which was subsequently brought to Rome and translated into

Latin by Decimus Silanus by order of the senate (J.P. Mahaffy, "The Work

of Mago," in _Hermathena_, xv. pp. 29-35).

In the midst of this prosperity the Second War with Rome broke out. At

this time the genius of Carthage is incarnate in Hannibal; his campaigns

in Spain, Italy and Africa have won the admiration of military experts

of all periods. The war became inevitable in 210 when Hannibal captured

Saguntum, which was in alliance with Rome. Passing through Spain and

Gaul, Hannibal resolved to carry the war into the heart of Italy

(218-217). The battles of the Ticinus, Trebia and Trasimene Lake are but

stages in the wonderful progress which culminated in the battle of

Cannae (August 2, 216). The road to Rome was now open to him, but he did

not profit by his advantage, while the Carthaginian senate, to its

shame, withheld all further support. His brother Hasdrubal with his

relieving army was defeated at the Metaurus in 207; the Romans recovered

their hold in Spain, and, seeing that Hannibal was unable to move in

Italy, carried the war back to Africa. Hearing that Scipio had taken

Utica (203) and defeated Hasdrubal and Syphax, king of Numidia, Hannibal

returned from Italy, but with a hastily levied army was defeated at Zama

(October 19, 202). The subsequent peace was disastrous to Carthage,

which lost its fleet and all save its African possessions.

After the Second War Carthage soon revived. The population is said still

to have numbered 700,000, and despite its humiliation, the city never

ceased to inspire alarm at Rome. The Numidian prince Massinissa, rival

of Syphax and a Roman protege, took advantage of a clause in the treaty

of 202, which forbade Carthage to make war without the consent of the

Roman senate, to extend his possessions at the expense of Carthage. In

response to a protest from Carthage an embassy including M. Porcius Cato

the Elder was sent to inquire into the matter, and Cato was so impressed

with the city as a whole that on returning to Rome he never made a

speech without concluding with the warning "Delenda est Carthago."

At this time there were three political parties in Carthage: (1) that

which upheld the Roman alliance, (2) hat which advocated the Numidian

alliance, and (3) the popular party. These three were led respectively

by Hanno, Hannibal Passer, Hasdrubal and Carthalo. The popular faction,

which was turbulent and exasperated by the bad faith of the Romans,

expelled the Numidian party and declared war in 149 on Massinissa, who

was victorious at Oroscope. Rome then intervened, determined finally to

destroy her now enfeebled rival. War was declared on the pretext that

Carthage had engaged in war with Massinissa without the sanction of

Rome. The third Punic War lasted three years, and after a heroic

resistance the City fell in 146. The last champions of liberty

entrenched themselves under Hasdrubal in the temple of Eshmun, the site

of which is now occupied by the chapel of St Louis. The Roman troops

were let loose to plunder and burn. The thick bed of cinders, blackened

stones, broken glass, fragments of metal twisted by fire, half-calcined

bones, which is found to-day at a depth of 13 to 16 ft. under the

remains of Roman Carthage between Byrsa and the harbours, bears grim

witness, in accord with the accounts of Polybius and Appian, to the

terrible fate which overtook this part of the city. Before long a

commission arrived from Rome to decide the fate of the province of

Carthage. In the city itself, temples, houses and fortifications were

levelled to the ground, the site was dedicated with solemn imprecations

to the infernal gods, and all human habitation throughout the vast

ruined area was expressly forbidden.

_Constitutional History._--The narrative must here be interrupted by

an account of the political and religious development of Phoenician

Carthage. Carthage was an aristocratic republic based on wealth rather

than on birth. Indeed, the popular party, which included certain noble

families such as the Barcidae, was always powerful, and thus

government by demagogues was not infrequent. So Aristotle, writing

about 330, emphasizes the importance of great wealth in Carthaginian

politics. The government was in fact a plutocracy. The aristocratic

party was represented by the two suffetes and the senate; the

democratic by the popular assembly. The suffetes (_Sofetim_) presided

in the senate and controlled the civil administration; the office was

annual, but there was no limit to re-election. Hannibal was elected

for twenty-two years. The senate, which, like that of Tyre, was

composed of 300 members, exercised ultimate control over all public

affairs, decided on peace and war, nominated the Commission of Ten,

which was charged with aiding and controlling the suffetes. This

commission was subsequently replaced, by a council of one hundred,

called by the Greeks _gerousia_. This tribunal, which maintained law

and order and called the generals to account, gradually became a

tyrannical inquisition. Frequently it met at night in the Temple of

Eshmun On Byrsa, in secret sessions described by Aristotle as [Greek:

sussitia ton hetairion].

The popular assembly was composed, not of all the citizens, but of the

_timuchi_ (Gr. [Greek: time, echein]), i.e. those who possessed a

certain property-qualification. The election of the suffetes had to be

ratified by this assembly. The two bodies were almost always in

opposition, and this was one of the chief causes of the ruin of

Carthage.

The army was recruited externally by senators who were sent to the

great _emporia_ or trade-centres, even to the most remote, to contract

with local princes for men and officers. The payments, agreed upon in

this way, were frequently in arrears; hence the terrible revolts such

as that of the "bellum inexpiabile." It was not till the 3rd century

that Carthage, in imitation of the kings of Syria and Egypt, began to

make use of elephants in war. The elephant used was the African type

(_elephas capensis_), which was smaller than the Asiatic (_elephas

indicus_), though with longer ears. In addition to the mercenaries,

the army contained a legion composed of young men belonging to the

best families in the state; this force was important as a nursery of

officers.

_Religion_.--The religion of Carthage was that of the Phoenicians.

Over an army of minor deities (_alonim_ and _baalim_) towered the

trinity of great gods composed of Baal-Ammon or Moloch (identified by

the Romans with Cronus or Saturn); Tanit, the virgin goddess of the

heavens and the moon, the Phoenician Astarte, and known as Juno

Caelestis in the Roman period; Eshmun, the protecting deity and

protector of the acropolis, generally identified with Aesculapius.

There were also special cults: of Iolaus or Tammuz-Adonis, whom the

Romans identified to some extent with Mercury; of the god Patechus or

Pygmaeus, a deformed and repulsive monster like the Egyptian Ptah,

whose images were placed on the prows of ships to frighten the enemy;

and lastly of the Tyrian Melkarth, whose functions were analogous to

those of Hercules. The statue of this god was carried to Rome after

the siege of 146 (Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ xxxvi. 12. 39). From

inscriptions we know the names of other minor deities, which are

perhaps only other names of the same gods, e.g. Rabbat Umma, "the

great mother"; Baalat haedrat, "mistress of the sanctuary"; Ashtoreth

(Astarte), Illat, Sakon, Tsaphon, Sid, Aris (? Ares).

From the close of the 4th century B.C. the intimate relations between

the Carthaginians and the Sicilian Greeks began to introduce Hellenic

elements into this religion. In the forum of Carthage was a temple to

Apollo containing a colossal statue, which was transported to Rome.

The Carthaginians once at least sent offerings to Delphi, and Tanit

approximated to some extent to Demeter; hence on the coins we find the

head of Tanit or the Punic Astarte crowned with ears of corn, in

imitation of the coins of the Greek Sicilian colonies. The symbol of

Tanit is the crescent moon; in her temple at Carthage was preserved a

famous veil or _peplus_ which was venerated as the city's palladium.

On the innumerable votive stelae which have been unearthed, we find

invocations to Tanit and Baal-Ammon, as two associate deities ([Greek:

theoi paredroi]). The usual formula in these inscriptions is, "To the

great lady Tanit, the manifestation [reflex, face] of Baal

(_Tanti-Pene-Baal_) and to our lord Baal-Ammon, the vow of Bomilcar,

son of Mago, son of Bomilcar, because they have heard his prayer"

(_Corp. inscr. semit._ vol. i. pp. 276 f.; Audollent, _Carth. Rom._ p.

369).

Baal-Ammon or Moloch, the great god of all Libya, is represented as an

old man with ram's horns on his forehead; the ram is frequently found

with his statues. He appears also with a scythe in his hand ("_falcem

ferens senex pingitur_." St Cyprian, _De idol. vanit._ 11). At

Carthage children were sacrificed to him, and in his temple there was

a colossal bronze statue in the arms of which were placed the children

who were to be sacrificed (Diod. Sic. xx. 14; Justin xviii. 6, xix. 1;

Plut. _De superstit._ 13, _De sera num. vindic._ 6.). The children

slipped one by one from the arms into a furnace amid the plaudits of

fanatical worshippers. These sacrifices persisted even under Roman

rule; Tertullian states that even in his time they took place in

secret (_Apolog._ cix.; cf. Delattre, "Inscript. de Carth.," in

_Bulletin epigraphique_, iv. p. 317; Audollent, op. cit. p. 398).

(4) _Roman Period._--In 122 B.C., twenty-four years after the

destruction of the city by Scipio Aemilianus, the Roman senate, on the

proposal of Rubrius, decided to plant a Latin colony on the site. C.

Gracchus and Fulvius Flaccus were entrusted with the foundation of the

new city, which was christened _Colonia Junonia_, and placed under the

protection of Juno Caelestis, the new name for the Punic Tanit. But its

prosperity was obstructed both by unpropitious omens and by the very

recollection of the ancient feud, and fifty years later Marius,

proscribed by Sulla, found the ruins practically deserted. In the

neighbourhood were the scattered remnants of the old Punic population,

who, according to Athenaeus (_Deipnosoph._ v. 50), had actually had the

assurance to send ambassadors to Mithradates the Great assuring him of

their support against Rome. Ultimately M. Minucius Rufus passed a law

abrogating that of 122 and suppressing the _Colonia Junonia_.

Julius Caesar, pursuing the lost supporters of Pompey, encamped on the

ruins of the city, and there, according to tradition, had a dream which

induced him to re-establish the abandoned colony. Returning to Rome, he

despatched thither the poor citizens who were demanding land from him.

Later on Augustus sent new colonists, and, henceforward, the machinery

of administration was regularly centred there (Appian viii. 136; Dio

Cass. lxxx. 1; Audollent, op. cit. p. 46). The proconsuls of the African

province had hitherto lived at Utica; in 14-13 B.C. C. Sentius

Saturninus transferred his headquarters to Carthage, which was

henceforth known as _Colonia Julia Carthago_. Several inscriptions use

this name, as also the bronze coins which bear the heads of Augustus and

Tiberius, and were struck at first in the name of the _suffetes_,

afterwards in that of _duumviri_.

Pomponius Mela and Strabo already describe Carthage as among the

greatest and most wealthy cities of the empire. Herodian puts it second

to Rome, and such is the force of tradition that the Roman citizens

resident in Carthage boasted of its Punic past, and loved to recall its

glory. Virgil in the _Aeneid_ celebrated the misfortunes of Dido, whom

the colonists ultimately identified with Tanit-Astarte; a public

Dido-cult grew up, and the citizens even pretended to have discovered

the very house from which she had watched the departure of Aeneas. The

religious character of these legends, coupled with the city's resumption

of its old role as mistress of Africa, and its independent spirit,

reawakened the old distrust, and even up to the invasions of the Vandals

the jealous rivalry of Rome forbade the reconstruction of the city

walls.

The revolt of L. Clodius Macer, legate of Numidia, in A.D. 68 was warmly

supported by Carthage, and one of the coins of this short-lived power

bears the symbol of Carthage personified. At the moment of the accession

of Vitellius, Piso, governor of the province of Africa, was in his turn

proclaimed emperor at Carthage. A little later, under Antoninus Pius, we

read of a fire which devastated the quarter of the forum; about the

same time, i.e. under Hadrian and Antoninus, there was built the famous

Zaghwan aqueduct, which poured more than seven million gallons of water

a day into the reservoirs of the Mapalia (La Malga); the cost of this

gigantic work was defrayed by a special tax which pressed heavily on the

inhabitants as late as the reign of Septimius Severus; allusions to it

are made on the coin-types of this emperor (E. Babelon, _Revista

italiana di numismatica_, 1903, p. 157).

In the early history of Christianity Carthage played an auspicious part,

in virtue of the number of its disciples, the energy and learning of

their leaders, the courage and eloquence of its teachers, the

persecutions of which it was the scene, the number of its councils and

the heresies of which it witnessed the birth, propagation or extinction

(see CARTHAGE, SYNODS OF). The labours of Delattre have filled the St

Louis museum at Carthage with memorials of the early Church. From the

end of the 2nd century there was a bishop of Carthage; the first was

Agrippinus, the second Optatus. At the head of the apologists, whom the

persecutions inspired, stands Tertullian. In 202 or 203, in the

amphitheatre, where Cardinal Lavigerie erected a cross in commemoration,

occurred the martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicitas. Tertullian was

succeeded (248) by a no less famous bishop Cyprian. About this time the

proconsul Gordian had himself proclaimed (239) emperor at Thysdrus (El

Jem). Shortly afterwards Sabinianus, aspiring to the same dignity, was

besieged by the procurator of Mauretania; the inhabitants gave him up

and thus obtained a disgraceful pardon (R. Cagnat, _L'armee romaine

d'Afrique_ p. 52; Audollent, op. cit. p. 73). Peace being restored, the

persecution of the Christians was renewed by an edict of the emperor

Decius (250). Cyprian escaped by hiding, and subsequently caused the

heresy of Novatian to be condemned in the council of 251. In 257, in a

new persecution under Valerian, Cyprian was beheaded by the proconsul

Galerius Maximus.

About 264 or 265 a certain Celsus proclaimed himself emperor at

Carthage, but was quickly slain. Probus, like Hadrian and Severus,

visited the city, and Maximian had new baths constructed. Under

Constantius Chlorus, Maxentius proclaimed himself emperor in Africa;

this caused great excitement in Carthage, and the garrison, which was

hostile to the pretender, compelled L. Domitius Alexander to assume the

purple. Domitius was, however, captured by Maxentius and strangled at

Carthage. About 311 there arose the famous Donatist heresy, supported by

270 African bishops (see DONATISTS and CONSTANTINE I.). At the synod of

Carthage in 411 this heresy was condemned owing to the eloquence of

Augustine. Two years later the Carthaginian sectaries even ventured upon

a political rebellion under the leadership of Heraclianus, who

proclaimed himself emperor and actually dared to make a descent on Italy

itself, leaving his son-in-law Sabinus in command at Carthage. Being

defeated he fled precipitately to Carthage, where he was put to death

(413). Donatism was followed by Pelagianism (see PELAGIUS), also of

Carthaginian origin, and these religious troubles were not settled when

in May 429 the Vandals, on the appeal of Count Boniface, governor of

Africa, crossed the Straits of Gibraltar and invaded Mauretania.

Genseric, who was hailed with one accord by all the different sectaries

as the champion of their several views, appeared in 439 before the walls

of Carthage, which had been hastily rebuilt after five hundred years by

the order of Theodosius II. The priest Salvianus has left a splendid

picture of Carthage at this moment (_de Gubern._ vii. 16). It had

500,000 inhabitants, and 22 basilicas (several of which have been

discovered by Delattre). Genseric entered almost without a blow (October

19, 439), and gave over the city to plunder before departing for his

attack on Italy. From this time Carthage became, in the hands of the

Vandals, a mere pirate stronghold, such as Tunis and Algiers were

subsequently to become. Once, in 470, the fleet of the Eastern empire

under the orders of Basiliscus appeared in the Bay of Carthage, but

Genseric succeeded in setting fire to the attacking ships and from Byrsa

watched their entire annihilation.

_Byzantine Rule_.--Under Genseric's successors (see VANDALS), Carthage

was still the scene of many displays of savage brutality, though

Thrasamund built new baths and a basilica. Ultimately Gelimer, the last

Vandal king, was defeated at Ad Decimum by the Byzantine army under

Belisarius, who entered Carthage unopposed (September 14, 533). The

restored city now received the name of Colonia Justiniana Carthago;

Belisarius rebuilt the walls and entrusted the government to Solomon.

New basilicas and other monuments were erected, and Byzantine Carthage

recovered for a century the prosperity of the Roman city.

At length the Arabs, having conquered Cyrenaica and Tripolitana (647),

and founded Kairawan (670), arrived before Carthage. In 697 Hasan ibn

en-Noman, the Gassanid governor of Egypt, captured the city almost

without resistance. But the garrison left by the Arabs was quite unable

to defend itself against the patrician Joannes, who retook the city and

hastily put it in a state of defence. Hasan returned furious with anger,

defeated the Byzantines again, and decreed the entire destruction of the

city. His orders were fulfilled; and in 698 Carthage finally disappears

from history. Once again only does the name appear in the middle ages,

when the French king, Louis IX., at the head of the eighth crusade,

disembarked there on the 17th of July 1270. He died, however, of the

plague on the 25th of August without having recovered northern Africa

for civilization.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--I. _Ancient_.--(a) Polybius, Diodorus Siculus, Livy,

Appian, Justin, Strabo; (b) for the Christian period, Tertullian,

Cyprian, Augustine; (c) for the Byzantine and Vandal, Procopius and

Victor de Vita. All the references to the topography of Roman and

Byzantine Carthage are collected in Audollent, _Carthage romaine_

(1901), pp. 775-825, which also contains a full list of modern works

(pp. 13-32. and p. 835).

II. _Modern_.--The most important are: Falbe, _Recherches sur

l'emplacement de Carthage_ (Paris, 1833); Dureau de la Malle,

_Topographie de Carthage_ (Paris, 1835); Nathan Davis, _Carthage and

her Remains_ (London, 1861); Beule, _Fouilles a Carthage_ (Paris,

1861); Victor Guerin, _Voyage archeologique dans la regence de Tunis_

(Paris, 1862); E. de Sainte Marie, _Mission a Carthage_ (Paris, 1884);

C. Tissot, _Geographie comparee de la province romaine d'Afrique_

(Paris, 1884-1888, 2 vols.); E. Babelon, _Carthage_ (Paris, 1896);

Otto Meltzer, _Geschichte der Karthager_ (Berlin, 1879-1896, 2 vols.);

Paul Monceaux, _Les Africains, etude sur la litterature latine de

l'Afrique; Les Paiens_ (Paris, 1898); _Histoire litteraire de

l'Afrique chretienne_ (Paris, 1901-1909, 3 vols.); Pallu de Lessert,

_Vicaires et comtes d'Afrique_ (Paris, 1892); _Fastes des provinces

africaines sous la domination romaine_ (Paris, 1896-1901, 2 vols.); R.

Cagnat, _L'Armee romaine d'Afrique_ (Paris, 1892); C. Diehl,

_L'Afrique byzantine, histoire de la domination byzantine en Afrique_

(Paris, 1896); Aug. Audollent, _Carthage romaine_ (Paris, 1901); A.J.

Church and A. Gilman, _Carthage_ in "Story of the Nations" series

(1886). For the numerous publications of Pere Delattre scattered in

various periodicals see _Etude sur les diverses publications du R.P.

Delattre_, by Marquis d'Anselme de Puisaye (Paris, 1895); Miss Mabel

Moore's _Carthage of the Phoenicians_ (London, 1905) contains a useful

summary of Delattre's excavations. See further for the discussion of

particular points: "Chronique archeologique africaine," published by

Steph. Gsell, in the _Revue africaine_ of Algiers, 1893, and following

years; and in the _Melanges d'archeologie et d'histoire de l'Ecole

francaise de Rome_, vol. xv. (1895 and following years); Dr Carton,

"Chronique archeologique nord-africaine," in the _Revue tunisienne_.

(E. B.*)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Carnegie Andrew" to "Casus Belli" Volume 5, Slice 4 · 第 23 / 43 题