WILLIAM MAGINN

1793-1842

[Sidenote: William Maginn’s _Miscellanies_.]

“All were standing, all were listening to some one who sat in the

middle of a group. A low-seated man, short in stature, was uttering

pleasantries and scattering witticisms about him with the careless

glee of his country. His articulation was impeded by a stutter, yet

the sentences he stammered forth were brilliant repartees uttered

without sharpness, and edged rather with humour than with satire. His

countenance was rather agreeable than striking; its expression sweet

rather than bright; the gray hair, coming straight over his forehead,

gave a singular appearance to a face still bearing the attributes of

youth. He was thirty or thereabouts, but his thoughtful brow, his hair,

and the paleness of his complexion, gave him many of the attributes

of age. His conversation was careless and off-hand, and, but for the

impediment of speech, would have had the charm of a rich comedy.

His choice of words was such as I have rarely met with in any of my

contemporaries.”--1824.

[Sidenote: _Bentley’s Miscellany_, 1842.]

“I dined to-day at the Salopian with Dr. Maginn. He is a most

remarkable fellow. His flow of ideas is incredibly quick, and his

articulation so rapid, that it is difficult to follow him. He is

altogether a person of vast acuteness, celerity of apprehension, and

indefatigable activity both of body and mind. His is about my own

height; but I could allow him an inch round the chest. His forehead is

very finely developed, his organ of language and ideality large, and

his reasoning faculties excellent. His hair is quite gray, although he

does not look more than forty. I imagined he was much older looking,

and that he wore a wig. While conversing his eye is never a moment

at rest: in fact his whole body is in motion, and he keeps scrawling

grotesque figures upon the paper before him, and rubbing them out

again as fast as he draws them. He and Gifford are, as you know, joint

editors of the _Standard_.”

[Sidenote: _The Dublin University Magazine_, 1844.]

“Well does the writer of this notice recollect the feelings with which

he first wended to the residence of his late friend. He was then but

a mere boy, fresh from the university.... He went, and was shown

upstairs; the doctor was not at home, but was momentarily expected....

Suddenly, when his heart almost sank within him, a light step was heard

ascending the stairs--it could not be a man’s foot--no, it was too

delicate for that; it must, certainly, be the nursery-maid. The step

was arrested at the door, a brief interval, and Maginn entered. The

spell vanished like lightning, and the visitor took heart in a moment.

No formal-looking personage, in customary suit of solemn black, stood

before him, but a slight, boyish, careless figure, with a blue eye,

the mildest ever seen--hair, not exactly white, but of a sunned snow

colour--an easy, familiar smile--and a countenance that you would be

more inclined to laugh with than feel terror from. He bounded across

the room with a most unscholar-like eagerness, and warmly welcomed the

visitor, asking him a thousand questions, and putting him at ease with

himself in a moment. Then, taking his arm, both sallied forth into the

street, where, for a long time, the visitor was in doubt whether it

was Maginn to whom he was really talking as familiarly as if he were

his brother, or whether the whole was a dream. And such, indeed, was

the impression generally made on the minds of all strangers--but, as

in the present case, it was dispelled instantly the living original

appeared. Then was to be seen the kindness and gentleness of heart

which tinged every word and gesture with sweetness; the suavity and

mildness, so strongly the reverse of what was to be expected from the

most galling satirest of the day; the openness of soul and countenance,

that disarmed even the bitterest of his opponents; the utter absence

of anything like prejudice and bigotry from him the ablest and most

devoted champion of the Church and State. No pedantry in his language,

no stateliness of style, no forced metaphors, no inappropriate

anecdote, no overweening confidence--all easy, simple, agreeable, and

unzoned.”

Word Portraits of Famous Writers · 第 74 / 141 题