292. MARTYRDOM OF ST. SEBASTIAN.

_Antonio Pollajuolo_ (Florentine: 1429-1498).

This picture is expressly ascribed by Vasari to Antonio alone.

On the other hand, Albertini, an earlier authority (1510),

ascribes it to Piero, the younger brother of Antonio. It is

known that many pictures were the joint production of both

brothers--Antonio furnishing the design, and Piero putting it

into colour. "In the 'St. Sebastian,'" says Sir F. Burton, "we

probably have a work so produced; the severe and strenuous

drawing of the elder brother, the sculptor and _toreuta_ by

profession, is visible throughout; whether he shared in the

painting, and if he did, to what extent, may remain an open

question."

Antonio Pollajuolo (the "poulterer,"--so called from his

grandfather's trade) is an interesting man from two points of

view: first, as an instance of the union of the arts in old

times; for he was a working goldsmith and engraver as well as

a sculptor and painter. He took to painting comparatively late

in life, desiring, says Vasari, "for his labour a more enduring

memory" than belongs to works of the goldsmith's art; "and his

brother Piero being a painter, he joined himself to him for

the purpose of learning the modes of proceeding in painting.

He acquired a knowledge in the course of a few months and

became an excellent master." He became, indeed, an excellent

draughtsman, but "neither harmony of colours nor grace was

the strong point of this master" (Morelli's _Italian Masters

in German Galleries_, p. 351). In 1484 Antonio was invited

to Rome by Pope Innocent VIII., and executed some important

monumental works in St. Peter's. His brother died in 1496;

Antonio, two years later. The two brothers were buried in S.

Pietro in Vincoli, where busts of them may be seen. Antonio

is interesting, in the second place, for the developments he

introduced into Italian painting. He was one of the first of

the Florentines to adopt an oil medium, and the first (says

Vasari) who had recourse to the dissection of the dead subject.

To him, therefore, Ruskin attributes a baleful influence. "The

virtual beginner of artistic anatomy in Italy was a man called

'the poulterer'--Pollajuolo, a man of immense power, but on

whom the curse of the Italian mind in this age was set at its

deepest. See the horrible picture of St. Sebastian by him in

our National Gallery." He was the beginner of those anatomical

studies, continues Ruskin, which, pursued and established

by later masters, "polluted their work with the science of

the sepulchre, and degraded it with presumptuous and paltry

technical skill. Foreshorten your Christ, and paint Him, if

you can, half-putrefied--that is the scientific art of the

Renaissance" (_Ariadne Florentina_, Appendix IV.).

How popular this "scientific art" was in its day may be seen from the

following enthusiastic account which Vasari gives of this picture:--

A remarkable and admirably executed work, with numerous

horses, many undraped figures, and singularly beautiful

foreshortenings. This picture likewise contains the portrait

of St. Sebastian himself, taken from the life--from the face

of Gino di Ludovico Capponi, that is. The painting has been

more extolled than any other ever executed by Antonio. He has

evidently copied nature in this work to the utmost of his

power, as we perceive more particularly in one of the archers,

who, bending towards the earth, and resting his weapon against

his breast, is employing all the force of a strong arm to

prepare it for action; the veins are swelling, the muscles

strained, and the man holds his breath as he applies all his

strength to the effort. Nor is this the only figure executed

with care; all the others are likewise well done, and in the

diversity of their attitudes give clear proof of the artist's

ability and of the labour bestowed by him on his work; all

which was fully acknowledged by Antonio Pucci, who gave him

three hundred scudi for the picture, declaring at the same time

that he was barely paying him for the colours. This work was

completed in the year 1475.

The dominant motive in the picture is, it will be seen, interest in

the mechanism of the human body; notice especially the muscles of the

executioners' legs and their efforts in stretching their bows. There

are, however, other points worthy of notice. "The work is not less

remarkable for the extent and variety of the landscape, and for the

sense of aerial, as distinct from mere linear, perspective. Instead

of standing up like a wall behind the figures it appears to recede to

the horizon, as in nature. The study of the remains of classical art

also is betrayed by the introduction of one of the Roman monumental

arches in the background. The groups of soldiers and horses introduced

at different distances further attest the variety of the designers'

interests" (Monkhouse: _In the National Gallery_, 1894, p. 77).

A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin · 第 297 / 1401 题