François Zola in Paris--A rebuff and a success--Progress of his canal

scheme--He is struck down by the "mistral" and dies--His obsequies and

his grave--Difficulties of his widow and son--Lawsuits--Aix, a city

of Philistines or of enlightenment?--Émile Zola, a spoilt child--His

first schooling and first chums--He plays the truant--Declining family

circumstances--Zola is sent to the Aix College--His many prizes,

and his first literary attempts--The college and its masters--Zola,

Baille, and Cézanne; their pranks and their rambles--The country

round Aix--Zola's lines on Provence--He is influenced by Hugo

and Musset--Ideal love: Gratienne and Ninon--Increasing family

penury--Madame Zola seeks help in Paris--She is joined there by her

son--Zola at the Lycée St. Louis--He is "ploughed" for a degree in

Paris--His vacations in Provence--Early poetry--He is "ploughed" at

Marseilles--His studies stopped--A gloomy outlook.

The infancy of Émile Zola was spent in Paris, his father's enterprises

compelling the family to remain there till 1843. Throughout 1840 the

engineer was preparing plans of his fortification scheme, issuing

pamphlets, corresponding with Thiers, and interviewing General

Despans-Cubières, Minister of War. He renewed his efforts when Thiers

fell from power and was succeeded by Marshal Soult; but he was unable

to overcome the stolid indifference of General Dode, the war-office

director of fortifications, who, without even examining his plans,

reported against them on the ground that the government and the defence

committee had made up their minds four years previously with respect

to what system should be adopted. As Soult accepted this view of the

matter, Zola's efforts again came to nothing. His only consolation was

that, early in 1841, when the Paris fortification bill was finally

discussed by the legislature, his ideas found supporters in General

Schneider and M. Dufaure, a subsequent prime minister of France.[1] A

better result attended Zola's invention of an appliance for removing

the masses of earth, which, he foresaw, would be thrown up in digging

the moat of the Paris rampart. He patented this invention in June,

1841, and after his appliance had been constructed at some works in

the Rue de Miromesnil in 1842, it was employed successfully in the

excavations at Clignancourt.[2]

A few months later the indomitable engineer again turned to his scheme

for providing Aix with water. Removing thither with his wife and child,

he signed, in April, 1843, a new agreement with the municipality,

followed in June by another with the mayor of Le Tholonet, for a

large dam was to be constructed near that village, at the entrance

of the Infernet gorges. But although Zola's earlier suggestions had

now prompted the neighbouring city of Marseilles to cut a canal from

Pertuis on the Durance,--an enterprise carried out by a distinguished

engineer named Montrichet between 1839 and 1849,--some of the good

people of Aix and its vicinity remained uninfluenced by the example,

and a long battle ensued.

The waters which Zola had finally decided to bring to Aix were

those of the little rivers Causse and Bayou, and the interested

villages were gradually won over, though, now and again, territorial

magnates like the Marquis de Galliffet, Prince de Martigues,--father

of the well-known general officer and owner of the château of Le

Tholonet,--remained hostile to the scheme. Fortunately Zola, besides

having a good friend in M. Aude, the mayor of Aix, obtained support in

Paris, notably from Thiers and Mignet, whose association with the old

Provençal city is well known; and thus, in May, 1844, he obtained a

royal declaration of the public utility of his project, with leave to

expropriate landowners, purchase land, and capture water on terms which

were to be arranged. The landowners, however, often set extravagant

prices on their property, bitter disputes arose over valuations, and

all sorts of authorities, with interests at stake, raised one and

another claim and difficulty, the Council of State at last having

to re-adjust Zola's agreements with municipalities and others, in

such wise that a final covenant was only signed in June, 1845. Zola

then returned to Paris with his wife and son, for, apart from all

municipal help, a considerable amount of money had to be raised for the

enterprise, and it was not until midsummer, 1846, that the Zola Canal

Company was at last constituted.[3]

Then the engineer went southward once more. One reads in contemporary

newspapers that the great struggle had affected his health, that he was

no longer so strong as formerly, but it is certain that he felt full of

confidence. His courageous efforts were about to yield fruit: the work

was begun, the first sod was cut, the first blasting operations were

carried out successfully. Zola stood, as it were, on the threshold of

the promised land. And then, all at once, destiny struck him down. One

morning, after three months' toil, while he was superintending his men,

the "mistral" wind, that scourge of southern France, descended upon the

valley where they were working. The icy blast laid its clutch upon

Zola, but, although he already felt its chill, he would not defer a

business visit to Marseilles. He repaired thither, installing himself,

as was his habit, at the Hôtel de la Méditerranée kept by one Moulet,

in the Rue de l'Arbre. That same night he was attacked by pleurisy, and

on the morrow it became necessary to summon his wife, who had remained

at Aix. All remedies proved unavailing, and within a week he expired in

her arms. Thirty years afterwards that sudden death, in a second-class

hotel, amid unpacked trunks and the coming and going of heedless

travellers, suggested to Zola's son the account of Charles Grandjean's

death given in "Une Page d'Amour."[4]

It was on Saturday, March 27,1847, that François Zola thus passed away.

His remains were embalmed, and the obsequies took place at Aix on the

ensuing Tuesday, when the clergy went in procession to the Place de

la Rotonde, beyond the walls, to receive the body on its arrival. The

pall-bearers were the sub-prefect, the mayor, the government district

engineer, and Maître Labot, an eminent advocate of the Council of

State and the Court of Cassation, who had been one of Zola's leading

supporters. The capitular clergy, headed by a Canon-bishop of St.

Denis, officiated at the rites in the cathedral; and, as chief mourner,

immediately behind the hearse, when escorted by the civil and military

authorities it took the road to the cemetery, between crowds of

spectators, there walked a pale-faced little boy, barely seven years

of age, who moved as in a dream. In after years he retained little

recollection of his father. He pictured him best, he was wont to say,

by the aid of all that his mother had related of his affectionate

tenderness, his unflagging energy, his high and noble views. Thus how

great was the son's amazement, indignation, and sorrow when, long years

afterwards, unscrupulous enemies tried to make the world believe that

his father had been a thief.

On that matter the reader will form his own opinion, and it is largely

to enable him to do so that the chief facts of François Zola's career

of honourable and untiring industry have been recapitulated in these

pages. But another purpose also has been served. As the narrative

of Émile Zola's life proceeds, it will be observed how truly he was

his father's son, evincing in manhood the same energy, industry, and

perseverance, the same passion to strive against obstacles, and, by

striving, overcome them. In his case, the prompting of inherited nature

is the more manifest as he was of such tender years when his father

died, and thus escaped the influence of companionship and example,

which so often increase the resemblance of father and son. Ah, that

poor contemned doctrine of heredity, as old as the world itself, how

could Émile Zola fail to believe in it when he himself was a striking

illustration of its workings?

François Zola's widow placed a modest slab upon her husband's grave

in the cemetery of Aix, in which she herself was to be laid three

and thirty years later. A cedar shades the tomb from the flaring sky

poised over that glowing field of death, whence the view spreads to

many a hill and mountain, clad in blue and purple. And on the slab,

which is protected by iron chains dangling from granite billets, one

reads: "François Zola, 1795-1847. Françoise Émilie Zola, _née_ Aubert,

1819-1880." Aix, however, does not need the presence of that tomb to

remind it of one of its most notable benefactors. Although François

Zola died when his work was only in its first stage, although a little

later his original scheme was foolishly cut down, in such wise as

to necessitate other subsequent costly undertakings, and although

thirty-one years elapsed before the water he had coveted at last

entered Aix, the enterprise he planned has always been known popularly

as the Zola Canal. Further, after its completion in 1868, the local

municipality then in office, to efface in a measure the inconsiderate

treatment of his widow and his son by previous municipalities, bestowed

the name of Boulevard François Zola on a thoroughfare till then called

the Boulevard du Chemin-neuf.[5]

The expression "inconsiderate treatment" is certainly not too severe a

one to be applied to the action of some of the authorities of Aix in

their dealings with Zola's widow, who, in her own name and her son's,

inherited her husband's interest in the canal scheme. But she had to

contend also with others associated with the work. It was virtually

a repetition, or rather a variation, of the familiar story of the

confiding inventor and the greedy capitalist. In this instance the

inventor was dead, and only his heirs remained. He had fully disclosed

his scheme, prepared his plans, and others were eager to profit by

them. Thus his widow and his little boy were gradually regarded as

incumbrances, nuisances. Why not set them aside? Why not rob them?

Are not the widow and the orphan robbed every day? Besides, it is

often easy to bamboozle a young and inexperienced woman in matters of

law. Already at this time Madame Zola's parents had come to live with

her at Aix; but her father was aged, and deficient, it would seem,

in business capacity; while her mother, however bright, active, and

thrifty, was not the woman to give unimpeachable advice on intricate

legal questions. As for little Émile, now seven years old, he did not

even know his letters; he spent happy, careless days in the sunshine,

blissfully ignorant that trouble was assailing the home, and would

some day destroy it. Yet it was he who, long years afterwards, avenged

his father and his mother, in the only manner possibly in which they

could be avenged. Perhaps it did not affect the despoilers personally;

many of them, indeed, must have been dead at the time, and those who

survived may have only sneered, for the gold was theirs. None the less

the pictures of Aix and its society, traced in four or five volumes of

the Rougon-Macquart novels, were instinct with retribution. Aix still

raises ineffectual protests whenever it hears that name of Plassans

which the novelist gave it, and which, though its origin was simple

enough,--for it was merely a modification of Plassans, the name of

a village near Brignoles, southeast of Aix,--acquired under Zola's

caustic pen an element of opprobrium.

The displeasure of Aix in this respect has been the more marked as

the city's past is not destitute of grandeur. One of the earliest

stations of the Romans in Gaul, it became the metropolis of the Second

Narbonensis, but its walls, porticoes, thermæ, arena, and temples were

largely destroyed when the Saracens sacked it in the eighth century,

and few memorials of its classic era now exist. As the capital of

Provence in the days of "good King René," whose court was described

by Scott in "Anne of Geierstein," Aix regained some lustre, followed

half a century later by a period of trouble, many of its mediæval

monuments being wrecked during the struggle between Francis I and

Charles V, who was crowned King of Arles in the fane of St. Sauveur.

Nevertheless, girdled by picturesque mountains, with its old town, new

town, and faubourg, rich in stately edifices, pleasant promenades, and

elegant fountains, Aix remains one of the notable cities of southern

France. And if, administratively, as the French say, it is now only a

sub-prefecture of the department of the Bouches-du-Rhône, it continues

to be an archbishop's see, and retains its courts of justice and its

faculties of theology, law, and letters. Its university is perhaps its

greatest boast, though it is also proud of its museum and its splendid

library, which is known to scholars all the world over. Thus Aix claims

to be a city of enlightenment, not a town of Philistines, as it was

largely pictured by Émile Zola; but one must remember that he described

things as they were in his time, and that if a new and more active

generation has arisen nowadays, it was preceded by others, somnolent

and neglectful.

Aix has given several distinguished sons to France: the elder Vanloo;

Vauvenargues, the moralist; Mignet, the historian; Brueys, the poet,

and Brueys, the admiral who fell at the battle of the Nile; Michel

Adanson and Piton de Tournefort, the eminent naturalists; François

Granet, who translated Newton into French, and François Marius Granet,

his nephew, who distinguished himself in art, and became one of the

city's benefactors. Again, Portalis, the great jurisconsult, who

prepared the Concordat which still binds France and the Papal See, was

for a time one of the shining lights of the city, and Thiers, though

born at Marseilles, completed his studies at Aix, took his degrees, and

was called to the bar there. Curiously enough, the house where Thiers

had lived in his student days was the first home of the Zolas at Aix.

It stood at the end of a strip of road, a "no thoroughfare," called

picturesquely the Impasse Sylvacanne. There was a large garden to the

house, and in that garden little Émile disported himself as he listed.

His mother and grandmother spoilt him, as the saying goes. His father's

death filled them with indulgence for his childish faults. He was a boy

to be petted and humoured, for the greatest of misfortunes had fallen

on him. Spending so much of his time in the open air, he was becoming

quite a sturdy little fellow, sun-tanned, with soft, thoughtful eyes

and a perky nose, and his incessant questions seemed to indicate the

possession of an intelligent and eager mind. But, as yet, no attempt

was made to educate him. His mother was already busy with her lawyers,

striving to enforce her claims, and endeavouring also to obtain

influential support. When Thiers came to Aix some four months after

François Zola's death, the widow presented her little son to the great

man in the hope of thereby arousing his sympathy. And Thiers certainly

responded with fair words, though whether he went further is doubtful.

At all events, lawsuits were started, and to the worry they entailed

one must ascribe the comparative neglect in which young Émile remained

a little longer.

At last, in the autumn of 1847, it was decided to send him to school.

Some doubt as to the result of the lawsuits was already arising in the

minds of Madame Zola and her parents, and they felt that they must at

least provide for the boy's future by giving him a sound education.

It was suggested that he should be sent immediately to the College of

Aix--now called the Lycée Mignet; but as he did not even know his

letters, Madame Aubert, his grandmother, sensibly decided to select

a preparatory school. One was found near the Notre Dame gate, from

which it derived its appellation of Pension Notre Dame. It was kept

by a worthy and indulgent pedagogue, named Isoard, who after infinite

trouble--for the boy was stubborn and bitterly regretted his careless

life in the open air--contrived to teach him to read the Fables of La

Fontaine. It was at this time that young Émile formed his earliest

life-friendships; he became attached to two of his school-fellows,

one of whom, Solari, a sculptor of distinguished talent, is still

alive, while the other, Marius Roux, acquired a passing reputation as

a "popular" novel writer.[6] These two were Zola's usual playmates at

marbles, tops, and leap-frog, his first companions also in the rambles

in which he began to indulge.

For some reason or other, Madame Zola and the Auberts moved from the

Impasse Sylvacanne to the Pont-de-Beraud, in the open country, on the

road to Toulon, and then young Émile had fields before him with a

picturesque stream, the Torse, so called on account of its capricious

windings--"a torrent in December, the most timid of rivulets in the

fine weather," as he called it afterwards in his "Contes à Ninon."

And the charms of the country, the inviting banks of the Torse, often

made a truant of him,--a truant who remained unpunished, for as his

grandparents generally said "It was not right to cross the poor

fatherless boy."

The position of the family was now, however, becoming difficult. The

widow's savings were dwindling away in legal and living expenses; and

some who had been willing to help her were at present unable to do so,

having lost authority, influence, and, at times, even means. France had

passed through a revolution, Louis Philippe had been overthrown; unrest

was widespread throughout the period of the Second Republic; and when

Louis Napoleon strangled that _régime_ in the night, Provence became

convulsed, there were risings, excesses, bloodshed, even as Émile Zola

subsequently depicted in the pages of "La Fortune des Rougon." The new

municipality of Aix, appointed after the Coup d'État, was not inclined

to effect any reasonable compromise with those Orléanist _protégés_,

the Zolas. One on whom they had largely relied, Thiers, was himself

virtually a fugitive. Again, in those days of trouble the law's delays

became greater than ever; apart from which it would seem that Madame

Zola's actions were altogether ill-conducted. Nevertheless, in the

summer of 1852, though her affairs were taking a very unfavourable

course, and it was becoming necessary to trench upon the investments

whence the Auberts derived their modest personal income, it was at

last decided to send Émile to the College of Aix as a boarder, and the

family, in order to be nearer to him, moved into the town, its new home

being in the Rue Bellegarde.

The boy could now see that the family resources were diminishing.

The last servant had been dismissed, and it was his grandmother, the

still lively and sturdy Beauceronne, who attended to most of the

housework. Moreover, she and her daughter had largely taken the lad

into their confidence, and he, precociously realising that his future

would most likely depend on his own exertions, resolved to turn over

a new leaf. Though his love for the open air in no wise diminished,

he studied profitably from the time of entering the College of Aix

in October, 1852. He was placed in the seventh class (the lowest but

one), and at the expiration of the school year, in August, 1853, he

was awarded first prizes for history and geography, recitation, and

the translation of Latin into French, and second prizes for grammar,

arithmetic, religious instruction, and the translation of French into

Latin.[7] In the following year, in the sixth class, he was less

successful, some antipathy, it is said, existing between him and one of

the professors.[8] Nevertheless, his name was inscribed on the _tableau

d'honneur_, and he obtained a first prize for history and geography, a

first _accessit_[9] in religious instruction, and third _accessits_ in

excellence and recitation.

Next, 1854-1855, he passed into the fifth class, in which he gained two

first prizes for Latin, translation and composition; a second prize for

the translation of Greek into French, a first _accessit_ in excellence,

and third _accessits_ in French, history, geography, and recitation. At

the end of the ensuing school year, when he joined the fourth class, he

secured four first prizes--excellence, Latin composition, Latin verse,

translation from Latin into French; and three second prizes--history

and geography, grammar, and Greek exercise. Finally, in 1856-1857

(his last completed year, spent in the third class) he was awarded:

the _tableau d'honneur_ prize, first prizes for excellence, French

composition, arithmetic, geometry, physics, chemistry, natural history,

and recitation; second prizes for religious instruction and translation

from the Latin; with a first _accessit_ in history and geography. He

was then in his eighteenth year, and if prize-winning might be taken

as a criterion, there was every likelihood that he would achieve a

distinguished career.

But one must now go back a little, for other matters marked those

school days at Aix. At first the boy boarded at the college, then he

became a half-boarder, and finally an _externe_, or day pupil, taking

his meals at home; these changes being necessitated by the gradually

declining position of his family. Already while he was a boarder, that

is, barely in his teens, his literary bent began to assert itself,

a perusal of Michaud's "Histoire des Croisades" inspiring him to

write a romance of the middle ages, copiously provided with knights,

Saracens, and fair damsels in distress. That boyish effort, though the

almost illegible manuscript was preserved through life by its author,

remained unprinted, and a like fate attended a three-act comedy in

verse, entitled "Enfoncé le Pion," or "The Usher Outwitted." However,

given these literary leanings, and a fervent admiration for some of

the poets, as will presently be shown, it may at first seem strange

that on entering the third class in 1856, and being called upon to

choose between letters and sciences, Zola, then over seventeen, should

have selected the latter. In this respect, as Paul Alexis says, he was

influenced in part by the fact that, however proficient he might be in

the dead languages, he had no real taste for them, whereas the natural

sciences interested him; but his choice was also partially governed

by the fact that he was the son of an engineer, and that a scientific

career would be in accordance with his parentage. In his studies he was

guided by one simple, self-imposed rule, a rule which he carried into

his after-life, and which largely proved the making of him. He did not

eschew play and other recreation, he did not spend interminable hours

in poring over books, there was nothing "goody-goody" about him; but he

invariably learnt his lessons, prepared his exercises, before he went

to play. And, all considered, no more golden rule can be offered to the

schoolboy.

Zola and his disciple Paul Alexis, who also studied at the Aix

College, have sketched it as it was at that time--a former convent,

old and dank, with a somewhat forbidding frontage, a dark chapel, and

grimly barred windows facing a quiet little square, on which still

stands the rococo fountain of the Four Dolphins. Within the gate were

two large yards, one planted with huge plane trees, and the other

reserved chiefly for gymnastic exercises, while all around were the

class-rooms, the lower ones dismal, damp, and stuffy, and the upper

ones more cheerful of aspect, with windows overlooking the greenery

of neighbouring gardens. The refectory again was quite a den, always

redolent of dish-water; but comparative comfort might be found in

the infirmary, managed by some "gentle sisters in black gowns and

white coifs." The masters, if Zola's subsequent account of them in

"L'Œuvre" may be trusted, were generally ridiculed by the boys, who

gave them opprobrious nicknames. One, never known to smile, was called

"Rhadamantus"; another, "who by the constant rubbing of his head had

left his mark on the wall behind every seat he occupied, was named,

plumply, 'Filth'"; and a third had his wife's repeated infidelity

openly cast in his face.

Émile Zola, Novelist and Reformer: An Account of His Life & Work · 第 2 / 40 段