Mr. Kasson addressed Kossuth in an ample speech; in which he said:--

Everywhere have the untrammelled masses of this people, as you passed,

lifted up their hands and voices, and supplicated the Almighty to give

to you blessing, and to your country redemption. Let this be some

recompense for the privations you have encountered, while, like Aeneas,

you have been wandering an exile from your native, captured, prostrate

Troy.

I should not do my whole duty without saying, in behalf of the thousands

assembled here, that we have an unshaken confidence in Hungary's chosen

leader. We are not so blind that we cannot observe how no envenomed

shaft was fixed to the bow-string against him, in England and America,

while he was yet a helpless and powerless refugee, within Turkish

hospitality. But when the people were gathering around him in free

countries, shoulder to shoulder--when even the hearts of statesmen began

to open to him, and hope dawned in the Hungarian sky once more, then it

was these arrows of detraction darkened the air, shot from the Court of

the French Usurper, or from the pensioners of autocratic bounty. Your

patient labours and forbearance in your country's cause, while thus

assailed, have won for you, sir, our sincere respect, and another wreath

at the hand of the Muse of History.

Kossuth replied:

Gentlemen,--During my brief sojourn in your hospitable city, I have

heard so much local pettiness and so much hypocritical tactics of men

imported from Austria to advocate the cause of Russo-Austrian despotism

in Republican America, and chiefly in your city here, that indeed I

began to long for the pure air where the merry sunshine, as well as the

melancholy drop of rain, the roaring of the thunder storm, equally as

the sigh of the breeze, tell to the oppressors and their tools, and not

only to the oppressed, that there is a God in heaven who rules the

universe by eternal laws; the Almighty Father of humanity, omnipotent in

wisdom, bountiful in His omnipotence, just in His judgment, and eternal

in His love; the Lord who gave strength to the boy David against

Goliath, who often makes out of humble individuals efficient instruments

to push forward the condition of mankind towards that destiny which His

merciful will has assigned to it--His will, against which neither the

proud ambition of despots, nor the skill of their obsequious tools can

prevail--in Him I put my trust and go cheerfully on in my duties. I am

in the right way to benefit the cause, noble and just and great, to

which I devoted my life; for if there were no success in what I am

engaged, the despots would neither fear, nor hate, nor persecute me.

Their persecution imparts more hope to my breast than all your kindness;

and I give you my word that if I have the consciousness of having well

merited in my past the hatred and the fear of tyrants and their

instruments, so may God bless me as I will do all a mortal man can do to

merit that hatred and that fear still more.

Why? Am I not standing on the banks of the Mississippi, cheered,

welcomed, and supported, as warmly and as heartily as when I stepped

first upon your glorious shores? Opposition, hostility, venomous

calumny, have exhausted all means to check the sympathy of the people.

And has that sympathy subsided? has it abated? is it checked? No, it

rolls on swelling as I advance--here I have again an imposing evidence

before my eyes, here in St. Louis, my namesake city, where so much, and

that so perseveringly, was done to prevent this evidence.

Yes, it rolls, and will roll on, swelling till it will finally submerge

all endeavours to mislead the instincts of freemen, to fetter the

energies of the nation, to stifle its spirit, and to check the growing

aspirations of the people's upright heart.

When the struggle is about principles, indifference is suicide. Nay,

indifference is impossible: for indifference about the fate of that

principle upon which your national existence and all your future

rests--is passive submission to the opposite principle--it is almost

equivalent to an alliance with the despots. _He who is not for freedom

is against freedom_. There is no third choice.

The people's instinct feels the danger of losing an irreparable

opportunity, and hence the fact, never yet met in history, that a

homeless exile becomes an object of such sympathy, rolling on like a

sea, in spite of all the passionate rage of my enemies, and all the

Christian tolerance of the Reverend Father Jesuits, which they in such

an evident manner show to me. It is time to advertise them by a few

remarks that I am aware of their hostility, and ready to meet it openly.

I make this advertisement by design here, because it is not my custom to

attack from behind or in the dark. Mine is not the famous doctrine,

_that the end sanctifies the means_. I like to meet the enemy face

to face--a fair field and fair arms.

And in one thing more I will not imitate my reverend opponents. I will

never indulge in any personalities, never act otherwise than becoming to

a gentleman. If they choose to pursue a different course, let them do

so, and let them earn the fruits of it.

My humble person I entirely submit to the good pleasure of their

passion. If they tell you, gentlemen, that I am no great man, they speak

the truth. Being on good terms with my conscience, I do not much care to

be on bad terms with Czars and Emperors, their obedient servants, and

the reverend father Jesuits. Nay, if I were on good terms with them, I

scarcely could remain on good terms with my conscience. So much for

myself--now a few words as to the question between us.

I am claiming moral and material aid against that Czar of Russia who is

the most bloody persecutor of Roman Catholics. The present Pope himself,

before the revolution, when he was yet more of a High Priest than of an

Italian Despot, and cared more about spiritual than temporal business,

openly and bitterly complained in the councils of the Cardinals against

that bloody persecution which the Roman Catholics have suffered from the

Czar of Russia. Now, considering that I plead for republican principles,

to which the Reverend Father Jesuits should be _here_ warmly

attached, if they are willing to have the reputation of good citizens,

and not to be traitors to your Republic, which affords to them not only

the protection of its laws, but also the full enjoyment of all the

privileges of your republican freedom;--it is indeed a strange, striking

fact, to see these reverend fathers here in a Republic so warmly

advocating the cause of despotism, and so passionately persecuting the

cause I humbly plead, which at the same time is the cause of political

freedom and religious liberty for numerous millions of Roman Catholics

throughout Europe.

As I am somewhat acquainted with the terrible history of that Order, I

thought to find the explanation of this striking fact, in the historical

ambition of that Order to rule the world--this, their everlasting

standard idea, to which they in all times sacrificed everything, and

misused even the holiest of all religion, as an instrument to that

ambition. But here in St. Louis I got hold of a definite circumstance

which makes the matter quite clear.

I hold in my hand the printed Catalogue of the Society of Jesuits in the

province of Missouri, as they term your state. Herein I see that

amongst the thirty-five members officiating in the college of the Father

Jesuits, in St. Louis, there are not less than _eight_ Reverend

Father Jesuits imported from Austria. Now you see why I am so persecuted

here. This plain fact tells the story of a big book.

But amongst all that the reverend gentlemen oppose to me there are only

two considerations to which the honour of my cause and of my nation

forces me to answer in a few remarks. They charge against me that my

cause is hostile to the Roman Catholic religion, and to get the Irish

citizens to side with them for the support of Russo-Austrian despotism

they charge me that I am no friend of Ireland.

I. As to the Catholic religion--I indeed am a Protestant, not only by

birth, but also by conviction; and warmly penetrated by this conviction,

I would delight to see the same shared by the whole world. But before

all, I am mortally opposed to intolerance and to sectarism. I consider

religion to be a matter of conscience which every man has to arrange

between God and himself. And therefore I respect the religious

conviction of every man. I claim religious liberty for myself and my

nation, and must of course respect in others the right I claim for

myself. There is nothing in the world capable to rouse a greater

indignation in my breast than religious oppression. But particularly I

respect the Catholic religion, as the religion of some seven millions of

my countrymen, to whom I am bound in love, in friendship, in home

recollections, in gratitude, and in brotherhood, with the most sacred

ties. And I am proud to say, that as in general it is a pre-eminent

glory of my country, to be attached to the principle of full religious

liberty without any restriction, for all to all, so it is the particular

glory of my Roman Catholic countrymen not to be second to any in the

world, on the one side in attachment to their own religion, and on the

other side in toleration for other religions.

The Austrian dynasty having been continually encroaching upon the

chartered right of Protestantism, who were those who struggled in the

first rank for our rights? Our Roman Catholic countrymen! It was a

glorious sight, almost unparalleled in history, but was also fully

appreciated by the Hungarian Protestants. All of us, man by man, would

rather sacrifice life, and blood, and goods, than to allow that a hair's

breadth should be crushed from the religious liberty of our Roman

Catholic countrymen.

Now, what position took the Roman Catholics of Hungary in our past

struggle? There was not only no difference between them and the

Protestants in their devotion for our country's freedom and

independence, but they, according to the importance of their number,

took in the struggle a very pre-eminent part. The Roman Catholic Bishops

of Hungary protested against the perjurious treachery of the dynasty;

many of them suffer even now for their devotion to justice, liberty, and

right; and who is the Jesuit who dares to affirm that he is more devoted

to the Catholic religion than the Bishops of Hungary? Our battalions

were filled with Roman Catholic volunteers; Catholic priests led their

faithful flocks to the battle field; our National Convention was

composed in majority of Catholics--all the Catholic population, without

any exception, consented to and cheered enthusiastically my being

elected Governor of Hungary, though I am a Protestant. I had and I have

their friendship, their devotion, their support; and when I formed the

first Ministry of Independent Hungary, not only a full half of the new

Ministry I entrusted to Roman Catholics, but especially I nominated a

Roman Catholic Bishop to be Minister of public instruction, and all the

Protestants of my country hailed the nomination with applause. Such is

the cause of Hungary. Who dares now to charge me that that cause is

hostile to the Roman Catholic religion?

But I am allied with Mazzini, with the Romans, and with the Italians;

thus goes on the charge: and these cursed Italians are enemies to the

Pope. Not to the Pope as High Priest of the Roman Catholic Church, but

as despotic sovereign of Rome and his corrupted temporal government--the

worst of human inventions. How long has it been a principle of the Roman

Catholic religion, that the Romans should not be Republicans? and that

the high priest of the Roman church should be a despotic sovereign over

the Roman nation? and in that capacity be a devoted ally and obedient

servant to the Czar of Russia, the sworn enemy and bloody persecutor of

Roman Catholicism? Why, when in 1849, the French Republic sent an army

against the Roman Republic to restore the Pope, not to his spiritual

authority, because that was by nobody contradicted, but to his temporal

despotism, the whole danger could have been averted by the Romans by

becoming, _en masse_, Protestants. The idea was pronounced in Rome

and not a single Roman accepted it. They preferred to struggle without

hope of victory--they preferred to bleed and to die rather than to

abandon their faith.

Now, who can dare to insult that people--who can dare to insult the

Roman Catholics of Hungary, Croatia, Italy, Germany, Poland, France--who

can dare to insult the thousands of thousands of Roman citizens of the

United States--Senators, Governors, Judges--men of all public and

private positions--who can dare to insult them, as hostile to their own

religion, because they unite to support that cause which I plead? And

because they side with republican freedom, with civil and religious

liberty, against Russo-Austrian despotism?

Who can dare to affirm that he represents the Catholic religion, if

three millions of Catholic Romans do not represent it? The Reverend

Father Jesuits perhaps!

I take the liberty to say in a few words: They are that society which

Clement XIV, the high priest of the Roman Catholic Church, abolished as

dangerous to the Roman Catholic religion; they are those whom every

Roman Catholic King excluded from his territories as dangerous to

religion and social order; they are those, the ascendancy of whom has

always been a period of disaster and confusion to the Roman Catholic

church; they are those who now make an alliance or rather a compact of

submission with the Czar of Russia, like that which evil-doers,

according to the superstition of past ages, made with the evil spirit.

And here, in free republican America, they plead the cause of Russian

despotism; the cause of that Czar, who is the relentless persecutor of

Catholicism; who forced the United Greek Catholics, in the Polish

Provinces, by every imaginable cruelty, to abjure their connection with

Rome, and carried out, at a far greater expense of human life than

Ferdinand and Isabella or Louis XIV, the most stupendous proselytism

which violence has yet achieved. More than a hundred thousand human

beings had died of misery, or under the lash, as the Minsk nuns were

proved to have been killed, before he terrified these unhappy millions

into a submission against which their consciences revolted. Yet with

this man, red with Catholic blood, and damned with the million curses of

their co-religionists, the Rev. Father Jesuits are in alliance; and why?

Because it is a characteristic of that Order, to be ambitious to rule

the world. To achieve this, they have now made the Pope the obedient

satrap of the Czar. Into the enormity of this, enlightened Catholics see

clearly. Roman Catholics of Hungary, of Poland, of Italy, Germany, and

France have understood this. Is it possible that those of this republic

should less understand it? Why, in Italy and Rome itself, a majority of

the Catholic clergy are hostile to the temporal authority of the Pope,

and sympathize with Mazzini so generally, that of _seventeen_

conspirators recently arrested for conspiring in favour of the Republic

against Austria, _sixteen_ were _priests_ belonging to the

humbler orders of the clergy.

Gentlemen, I am sorry to have to argue such a question in the United

States. If it be indeed true, that amongst the Roman Catholics here an

opposition is got up against our cause, let them remember that in

opposing me, they oppose the independence and freedom of millions of

Hungarian Catholics,--of Catholic Italy,--of the Catholic half of

Germany, and of Catholic France; they are supporting the Czar, the most

bloody enemy of their religion. Yet I am glad to be able to say, that

not all the Roman Catholics here are opposed to me. I have warm friends

and kind protectors among them. The gallant General Shields,--Mr. Downs,

the Senator from Louisiana,--the warm-hearted Governor of

Maryland,--Judge Le Grand at Baltimore, and many other of my kindest

friends, are Roman Catholics. From New York onward, multitudes of Roman

Catholics have shared the general sympathy. And why not? surely freedom

is a treasure to every religious denomination whatsoever.[*]

[Footnote *: Some sentences have been added from the Pittsburg speech,

at the end of which the same subject was treated.]

So much for the charge that the cause which I plead--the cause of

millions of Roman Catholics--is hostile to the Roman Catholic religion.

Should I be forced to enter upon this topic once more, I will take the

heart-revolting history of those who have thus calumniated our cause,

into my hands, and recall to the memory of public opinion the terrible

pages of blood, ambition, countless crimes, and intolerance; but I hope

there will be no occasion for it.

II. Now as to Ireland. Where is a man on earth, with uncorrupted soul

and with liberal instincts in his heart, who would not sympathize with

poor, unfortunate Ireland? Where is a man, loving freedom and right, in

whom the wrongs of Green Erin would not stir the heart? Who could

forbear warmly to feel for the fatherland of the Grattans, of

O'Connells, and of Wolfe Tones? I indeed am such, that wherever is

oppression and a people, there is my love.

But why do I not plead Erin's wrongs? I am asked. My answer is: am I not

pleading the principle of Liberty? and is the cause of freedom not the

cause of Ireland?

I see all the despots of the European continent united in a crusade

against liberty; there are two powers still neutral, the position of

which may well decide for or against despotism; these two powers are

Great Britain and America. If the Almighty blessed my endeavours--if I

could succeed to contribute something, that America, and by its

influence over the public opinion of the people of England, Great

Britain itself, should side with Liberty, from whatever consideration--

from whatever interest, against despotism--then indeed I boldly declare

before God and men, that I have achieved a greater benefit and done a

better service to the future of Ireland, than all who go about loudly

crying about Erin's wrongs, and not doing anything for the triumph of

that cause which is about to be decided, and is the cause of all

nations, who are oppressed, and of all who are, or will be free.

Whereas, if, by uniting in the chorus of empty words, I should

contribute to alarm not only the government, but also the people of

England, and to force that government to side with despotism in the

decisive struggle against liberty, (to which that government, being as

it is, aristocratical, feels but too much inclined,) then indeed I am

sure I should do such a wrong to the future of Ireland, as the sacrifice

of my life and torrents of blood, and the sufferings of generations,

could not expiate.

Be sure therefore, gentlemen, that every man who pleads for liberty,

pleads for Ireland; be sure, that every blow stricken for liberty is

stricken also for Ireland; that not always the most noisy are the best

friends; and prudent activity is often better service than any show of

eloquent words.

And so let me hope, that while it is sure that he who is for freedom is

for Ireland, it also will be found that Irish blood can never be against

liberty.

And as to you all, gentlemen, let me hope that, however the advocates of

despotism may try to mislead public opinion in free America, the

uncorrupted noble instinct of the people will prove to the world that it

is not in vain, that the down-trodden spirit of liberty raises the sign

of distress towards you, and that the wronged and the oppressed can

confidently appeal for help, for justice and for redress, to the free

and powerful Republic of America.

I thank you, gentlemen, for the patience with which you have listened

during this torrent of rain. It shows that your sympathy is warm and

sincere--one which cannot be cooled down or washed away.

* * * * *

Select Speeches of Kossuth · 第 61 / 84 题