CHAPTER V.

ITALIAN PAINTING.

GOTHIC PERIOD. 1250-1400.

BOOKS RECOMMENDED: As before, Burckhardt, Crowe and

Cavalcaselle, Eastlake, Lafenestre, Lanzi, Lindsay, Reber;

also Burton, _Catalogue of Pictures in the National Gallery,

London_ (_unabridged edition_); Cartier, _Vie de Fra

Angelico_; Förster, _Leben und Werke des Fra Angelico_;

Habich, _Vade Mecum pour la Peinture Italienne des Anciens

Maîtres_; Lacroix, _Les Arts au Moyen-Age et à la Époque de

la Renaissance_; Mantz, _Les Chefs-d'oeuvre de la Peinture

Italienne_; Morelli, _Italian Masters in German Galleries_;

Morelli, _Italian Masters, Critical Studies in their Works_;

Rumohr, _Italienische Forschungen_; Selincourt, _Giotto_;

Stillman, _Old Italian Masters_; Vasari, _Lives of the Most

Eminent Painters_; consult also General Bibliography (p.

xv).

SIGNS OF THE AWAKENING: It would seem at first as though nothing but

self-destruction could come to that struggling, praying,

throat-cutting population that terrorized Italy during the Mediæval

Period. The people were ignorant, the rulers treacherous, the passions

strong, and yet out of the Dark Ages came light. In the thirteenth

century the light grew brighter, but the internal dissensions did not

cease. The Hohenstaufen power was broken, the imperial rule in Italy

was crushed. Pope and emperor no longer warred each other, but the

cries of "Guelf" and "Ghibelline" had not died out.

Throughout the entire Romanesque and Gothic periods (1000-1400) Italy

was torn by political wars, though the free cities, through their

leagues of protection and their commerce, were prosperous. A

commercial rivalry sprang up among the cities. Trade with the East,

manufactures, banking, all flourished; and even the philosophies, with

law, science, and literature, began to be studied. The spirit of

learning showed itself in the founding of schools and universities.

Dante, Petrarch, and Boccaccio, reflecting respectively religion,

classic learning, and the inclination toward nature, lived and gave

indication of the trend of thought. Finally the arts, architecture,

sculpture, painting, began to stir and take upon themselves new

appearances.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In painting, though there were some portraits

and allegorical scenes produced during the Gothic period, the chief

theme was Bible story. The Church was the patron, and art was only the

servant, as it had been from the beginning. It was the instructor and

consoler of the faithful, a means whereby the Church made converts,

and an adornment of wall and altar. It had not entirely escaped from

symbolism. It was still the portrayal of things for what they meant,

rather than for what they looked. There was no such thing then as art

for art's sake. It was art for religion's sake.

The demand for painting increased, and its subjects multiplied with

the establishment at this time of the two powerful orders of Dominican

and Franciscan monks. The first exacted from the painters more learned

and instructive work; the second wished for the crucifixions, the

martyrdoms, the dramatic deaths, wherewith to move people by emotional

appeal. To offset this the ultra-religious character of painting was

encroached upon somewhat by the growth of the painters' guilds, and

art production largely passing into the hands of laymen. In

consequence painting produced many themes, but, as yet, only after the

Byzantine style. The painter was more of a workman than an artist. The

Church had more use for his fingers than for his creative ability. It

was his business to transcribe what had gone before. This he did, but

not without signs here and there of uneasiness and discontent with the

pattern. There was an inclination toward something truer to nature,

but, as yet, no great realization of it. The study of nature came in

very slowly, and painting was not positive in statement until the time

of Giotto and Lorenzetti.

[Illustration: FIG. 22.--GIOTTO, FLIGHT INTO EGYPT. ARENA CHAP.

PADUA.]

The best paintings during the Gothic period were executed upon the

walls of the churches in fresco. The prepared color was laid on wet

plaster, and allowed to soak in. The small altar and panel pictures

were painted in distemper, the gold ground and many Byzantine features

being retained by most of the painters, though discarded by some few.

CHANGES IN THE TYPE, ETC.: The advance of Italian art in the Gothic

age was an advance through the development of the imposed Byzantine

pattern. It was not a revolt or a starting out anew on a wholly

original path. When people began to stir intellectually the artists

found that the old Byzantine model did not look like nature. They

began, not by rejecting it, but by improving it, giving it slight

movements here and there, turning the head, throwing out a hand, or

shifting the folds of drapery. The Eastern type was still seen in the

long pathetic face, oblique eyes, green flesh tints, stiff robes, thin

fingers, and absence of feet; but the painters now began to modify and

enliven it. More realistic Italian faces were introduced,

architectural and landscape backgrounds encroached upon the Byzantine

gold grounds, even portraiture was taken up.

This looks very much like realism, but we must not lay too much stress

upon it. The painters were taking notes of natural appearances. It

showed in features like the hands, feet, and drapery; but the anatomy

of the body had not yet been studied, and there is no reason to

believe their study of the face was more than casual, nor their

portraits more than records from memory.

No one painter began this movement. The whole artistic region of Italy

was at that time ready for the advance. That all the painters moved at

about the same pace, and continued to move at that pace down to the

fifteenth century, that they all based themselves upon Byzantine

teaching, and that they all had a similar style of working is proved

by the great difficulty in attributing their existing pictures to

certain masters, or even certain schools. There are plenty of pictures

in Italy to-day that might be attributed to either Florence or Sienna,

Giotto or Lorenzetti, or some other master; because though each master

and each school had slight peculiarities, yet they all had a common

origin in the art traditions of the time.

[Illustration: FIG. 23.--ORCAGNA, PARADISE (DETAIL). S. M. NOVELLA,

FLORENCE.]

FLORENTINE SCHOOL: Cimabue (1240?-1302?) seems the most notable

instance in early times of a Byzantine-educated painter who improved

upon the traditions. He has been called the father of Italian

painting, but Italian painting had no father. Cimabue was simply a man

of more originality and ability than his contemporaries, and departed

further from the art teachings of the time without decidedly opposing

them. He retained the Byzantine pattern, but loosened the lines of

drapery somewhat, turned the head to one side, infused the figure with

a little appearance of life. His contemporaries elsewhere in Italy

were doing the same thing, and none of them was any more than a link

in the progressive chain.

Cimabue's pupil, Giotto (1266?-1337), was a great improver on all his

predecessors because he was a man of extraordinary genius. He would

have been great in any time, and yet he was not great enough to throw

off wholly the Byzantine traditions. He tried to do it. He studied

nature in a general way, changed the type of face somewhat by making

the jaw squarer, and gave it expression and nobility. To the figure he

gave more motion, dramatic gesture, life. The drapery was cast in

broader, simpler masses, with some regard for line, and the form and

movement of the body were somewhat emphasized through it. In methods

Giotto was more knowing, but not essentially different from his

contemporaries; his subjects were from the common stock of religious

story; but his imaginative force and invention were his own. Bound by

the conventionalities of his time he could still create a work of

nobility and power. He came too early for the highest achievement. He

had genius, feeling, fancy, almost everything except accurate

knowledge of the laws of nature and art. His art was the best of its

time, but it still lacked, nor did that of his immediate followers go

much beyond it technically.

Taddeo Gaddi (1300?-1366?) was Giotto's chief pupil, a painter of much

feeling, but lacking in the large elements of construction and in the

dramatic force of his master. Agnolo Gaddi (1333?-1396?), Antonio

Veneziano (1312?-1388?), Giovanni da Milano (fl. 1366), Andrea da

Firenze (fl. 1377), were all followers of the Giotto methods, and were

so similar in their styles that their works are often confused and

erroneously attributed. Giottino (1324?-1357?) was a supposed imitator

of Giotto, of whom little is known. Orcagna (1329?-1376?) still

further advanced the Giottesque type and method. He gathered up and

united in himself all the art teachings of his time. In working out

problems of form and in delicacy and charm of expression he went

beyond his predecessors. He was a many-sided genius, knowing not only

in a matter of natural appearance, but in color problems, in

perspective, shadows, and light. His art was further along toward the

Renaissance than that of any other Giottesque. He almost changed the

character of painting, and yet did not live near enough to the

fifteenth century to accomplish it completely. Spinello Aretino

(1332?-1410?) was the last of the great Giotto followers. He carried

out the teachings of the school in technical features, such as

composition, drawing, and relief by color rather than by light, but he

lacked the creative power of Giotto. In fact, none of the Giottesque

can be said to have improved upon the master, taking him as a whole.

Toward the beginning of the fifteenth century the school rather

declined.

SIENNESE SCHOOL: The art teachings and traditions of the past seemed

deeper rooted at Sienna than at Florence. Nor was there so much

attempt to shake them off as at Florence. Giotto broke the immobility

of the Byzantine model by showing the draped figure in action. So also

did the Siennese to some extent, but they cared more for the

expression of the spiritual than the beauty of the natural. The

Florentines were robust, resolute, even a little coarse at times; the

Siennese were more refined and sentimental. Their fancy ran to

sweetness of face rather than to bodily vigor. Again, their art was

more ornate, richer in costume, color, and detail than Florentine art;

but it was also more finical and narrow in scope.

[Illustration: FIG. 24.--A. LORENZETTI. PEACE (DETAIL). TOWN-HALL,

SIENNA.]

There was little advance upon Byzantinism in the work of Guido da

Sienna (fl. 1275). Even Duccio (1260?----?), the real founder of the

Siennese school, retained Byzantine methods and adopted the school

subjects, but he perfected details of form, such as the hands and

feet, and while retaining the long Byzantine face, gave it a

melancholy tenderness of expression. He possessed no dramatic force,

but had a refined workmanship for his time--a workmanship perhaps

better, all told, than that of his Florentine contemporary, Cimabue.

Simone di Martino (1283?-1344?) changed the type somewhat by rounding

the form. His drawing was not always correct, but in color he was good

and in detail exact and minute. He probably profited somewhat by the

example of Giotto.

The Siennese who came the nearest to Giotto's excellence were the

brothers Ambrogio (fl. 1342) and Pietro (fl. 1350) Lorenzetti. There

is little known about them except that they worked together in a

similar manner. The most of their work has perished, but what remains

shows an intellectual grasp equal to any of the age. The Sienna

frescos by Ambrogio Lorenzetti are strong in facial character, and

some of the figures, like that of the white-robed Peace, are beautiful

in their flow of line. Lippo Memmi (?-1356), Bartolo di Fredi

(1330-1410), and Taddeo di Bartolo (1362-1422), were other painters of

the school. The late men rather carried detail to excess, and the

school grew conventional instead of advancing.

TRANSITION PAINTERS: Several painters, Starnina (1354-1413), Gentile

da Fabriano (1360?-1440?), Fra Angelico (1387-1455), have been put

down in art history as the makers of the transition from Gothic to

Renaissance painting. They hardly deserve the title. There was no

transition. The development went on, and these painters, coming late

in the fourteenth century and living into the fifteenth, simply showed

the changing style, the advance in the study of nature and the technic

of art. Starnina's work gave strong evidence of the study of form, but

it was no such work as Masaccio's. There is always a little of the

past in the present, and these painters showed traces of Byzantinism

in details of the face and figure, in coloring, and in gold embossing.

Gentile had all that nicety of finish and richness of detail and color

characteristic of the Siennese. Being closer to the Renaissance than

his predecessors he was more of a nature student. He was the first man

to show the effect of sunlight in landscape, the first one to put a

gold sun in the sky. He never, however, outgrew Gothic methods and

really belongs in the fourteenth century. This is true of Fra

Angelico. Though he lived far into the Early Renaissance he did not

change his style and manner of work in conformity with the work of

others about him. He was the last inheritor of the Giottesque

traditions. Religious sentiment was the strong feature of his art. He

was behind Giotto and Lorenzetti in power and in imagination, and

behind Orcagna as a painter. He knew little of light, shade,

perspective, and color, and in characterization was feeble, except in

some late work. One face or type answered him for all classes of

people--a sweet, fair face, full of divine tenderness. His art had

enough nature in it to express his meanings, but little more. He was

pre-eminently a devout painter, and really the last of the great

religionists in painting.

[Illustration: FIG. 25.--FRA ANGELICO. ANGEL (DETAIL). UFFIZI.]

The other regions of Italy had not at this time developed schools of

painting of sufficient consequence to mention.

PRINCIPAL WORKS: FLORENTINES--Cimabue, Madonnas S. M.

Novella and Acad. Florence, frescos Upper Church of Assisi

(?); Giotto, frescos Upper and Lower churches Assisi, best

work Arena chapel Padua, Bardi and Peruzzi chapels S. Croce,

injured frescos Bargello Florence; Taddeo Gaddi, frescos

entrance wall Baroncelli chapel S. Croce, Spanish chapel S.

M. Novella (designed by Gaddi (?)); Agnolo Gaddi frescos in

choir S. Croce, S. Jacopo tra Fossi Florence, panel pictures

Florence Acad.; Giovanni da Milano, Bewailing of Christ

Florence Acad., Virgin enthroned Prato Gal., altar-piece

Uffizi Gal., frescos S. Croce Florence; Antonio Veneziano,

frescos in ceiling of Spanish chapel, S. M. Novella, Campo

Santo Pisa; Orcagna, altar-piece Last Judgment and Paradise

Strozzi chapel S. M. Novella, S. Zenobio Duomo, Saints

Medici chapel S. Croce, Descent of Holy Spirit Badia

Florence, altar-piece Nat. Gal. Lon.; Spinello Aretino, Life

of St. Benedict S. Miniato al Monte near Florence,

Annunciation Convent degl' Innocenti Arezzo, frescos Campo

Santo Pisa, Coronation Florence Acad., Barbarossa frescos

Palazzo Publico Sienna; Andrea da Firenze, Church Militant,

Calvary, Crucifixion Spanish chapel, Upper series of Life of

S. Raniera Campo Santo Pisa.

SIENNESE--Guido da Sienna, Madonna S. Domenico Sienna;

Duccio, panels Duomo and Acad. Sienna, Madonna Nat. Gal.

Lon.; Simone di Martino, frescos Palazzo Pubblico, Sienna,

altar-piece and panels Seminario Vescovile, Pisa Gal.,

altar-piece and Madonna Opera del Duomo Orvieto; Lippo

Memmi, frescos Palazzo del Podesta S. Gemignano,

Annunciation Uffizi Florence; Bartolo di Fredi, altar-pieces

Acad. Sienna, S. Francesco Montalcino; Taddeo di Bartolo,

Palazzo Pubblico Sienna, Duomo, S. Gemignano, S. Francesco

Pisa; Ambrogio Lorenzetti, frescos Palazzo Pubblico Sienna,

Triumph of Death (with Pietro Lorenzetti) Campo Santo Pisa,

St. Francis frescos Lower Church Assisi, S. Francesco and S.

Agostino Sienna, Annunciation Sienna Acad., Presentation

Florence Acad.; Pietro Lorenzetti, Virgin S. Ansano,

altar-pieces Duomo Sienna, Parish Church of Arezzo (worked

with his brother Ambrogio).

TRANSITION PAINTERS: Starnina, frescos Duomo Prato

(completed by pupil); Gentile da Fabriano, Adoration

Florence Acad., Coronation Brera Milan, Madonna Duomo

Orvieto; Fra Angelico, Coronation and many small panels

Uffizi, many pieces Life of Christ Florence Acad., other

pieces S. Marco Florence, Last Judgment Duomo, Orvieto.

A Text-Book of the History of Painting · 第 5 / 20 章