To illustrate at once the nature and the abundance of these legends I

will quote a passage in which Messrs. Spencer and Gillen describe a

journey they took in company with some Warramunga natives over part of

their country:--"For the first two days our way lay across miserable

plain country covered with poor scrub, with here and there low ranges

rising. Every prominent feature of any kind was associated with some

tradition of their past. A range some five miles away from Tennant Creek

arose to mark the path traversed by the great ancestor of the Pittongu

(bat) totem. Several miles further on a solitary upstanding column of

rock represented an opossum man who rested here, looked about the

country, and left spirit children behind him; a low range of remarkably

white quartzite hills indicated a large number of white ant eggs thrown

here in the _wingara_[146] by the Munga-munga women as they passed

across the country. A solitary flat-topped hill arose to mark the spot

where the Wongana (crow) ancestor paused for some time to pierce his

nose; and on the second night we camped by the side of a waterhole where

the same crow lived for some time in the _wingara_, and where now there

are plenty of crow spirit children. All the time, as we travelled along,

the old men were talking amongst themselves about the natural features

associated in tradition with these and other totemic ancestors of the

tribe, and pointing them out to us. On the third day we travelled, at

first for some hours, by the side of a river-bed,--perfectly dry of

course,--and passed the spot where two hawks first made fire by rubbing

sticks together, two fine gum-trees on the banks now representing the

place where they stood up. A few miles further on we came to a

water-hole by the side of which the moon-man met a bandicoot woman, and

while the two were talking together the fire made by the hawks crept

upon them and burnt the woman, who was, however, restored to life again

by the moon-man, with whom she then went up into the sky. Late in the

afternoon we skirted the eastern base of the Murchison Range, the rugged

quartzite hills in this part being associated partly with the crow

ancestor and partly with the bat. Following up a valley leading into the

hills we camped, just after sunset, by the side of a rather picturesque

water-pool amongst the ranges. A short distance before reaching this the

natives pointed out a curious red cliff, standing out amongst the low

hills which were elsewhere covered with thin scrub. This, which is

called Tjiti, represents the spot where an old woman spent a long time

digging for yams, the latter being indicated by great heaps of stones

lying all around. On the opposite side of the valley a column of stone

marks the spot where the woman went into the earth. The water-hole by

which we were camped was called Wiarminni. It was in reality a deep pool

in the bed of a creek coming down from the hills. Behind it the rocks

rose abruptly, and amongst them there was, or rather would have been if

a stream had been flowing, a succession of cascades and rocky

water-holes. Two of the latter, just above Wiarminni, are connected with

a fish totem, and represent the spot where two fish men arose in the

_alcheringa_, fought one another, left spirit children behind, and

finally went down into the ground. We were now, so to speak, in the very

midst of _mungai_ [i.e. of places associated with the totems], for the

old totemic ancestors of the tribe, who showed a most commendable

fondness for arising and walking about in the few picturesque spots

which their country contained, had apparently selected these rocky

gorges as their central home. All around us the water-holes, gorges, and

rocky crags were peopled with spirit individuals left behind by one or

other of the following totemic ancestors:--Wollunqua, Pittongu (bat),

Wongana (crow), wild dog, emu, bandicoot, and fish, whose lines of

travel in the _alcheringa_ formed a regular network over the whole

countryside."[147]

[Sidenote: Dramatic ceremonies to commemorate the doings of ancestors.]

Similar evidence could be multiplied, but this may suffice to teach us

how to the minds of these Central Australian savages the whole country

is haunted, in the literal sense, not merely by the memories of their

dead, but by the spirits which they left behind them and which are

constantly undergoing reincarnation. And not only are the minds of the

aborigines preoccupied by the thought of their ancestors, who are

recalled to them by all the familiar features of the landscape, but they

spend a considerable part of their time in dramatically representing the

legendary doings of their rude forefathers of the remote past. It is

astonishing, we are told, how large a part of a native's life is

occupied with the performance of these dramatic ceremonies. The older he

grows, the greater is the share he takes in them, until at last they

actually absorb the greater part of his thoughts. The rites which seem

so trivial to us are most serious matters to him. They are all connected

with the great ancestors of the tribe, and he is firmly convinced that

when he dies his spirit will rejoin theirs and live in communion with

them until the time comes for him to be born again into the world. With

such solemnity does he look on the celebration of these commemorative

services, as we may call them, that none but initiated men are allowed

to witness them; women and children are strictly excluded from the

spectacle. These sacred dramas are often, though by no means always,

associated with the rites of initiation which young men have to pass

through before they are admitted to full membership of the tribe and to

participation in its deepest mysteries. The rites of initiation are not

all undergone by a youth at the same time; they succeed each other at

longer or shorter intervals of time, and at each of them he is

privileged to witness some of the solemn ceremonies in which the

traditions of the tribal ancestors are dramatically set forth before

him, until, when he has passed through the last of the rites and

ordeals, he is free to behold and to take part in the whole series of

mystery plays or professedly historical dramas. Sometimes the

performance of these dramas extends over two or three months, during

which one or more of them are acted daily.[148] For the most part, they

are very short and simple, each of them generally lasting only a few

minutes, though the costumes of the actors are often elaborate and may

have taken hours to prepare. I will describe a few of them as samples.

[Sidenote: Ceremony of the Hakea flower totem.]

We will begin with a ceremony of the Hakea flower totem in the Arunta

tribe, as to which it may be premised that a decoction of the Hakea

flower is a favourite drink of the natives. The little drama was acted

by two men, each of whom was decorated on his bare body by broad bands

of pearly grey edged with white down, which passed round his waist and

over his shoulders, contrasting well with the chocolate colour of his

skin. On his head each of them wore a kind of helmet made of twigs, and

from their ears hung tips of the tails of rabbit-bandicoots. The two sat

on the ground facing each other with a shield between them. One of them

held in his hand some twigs representing the Hakea flower in bloom;

these he pretended to steep in water so as to brew the favourite

beverage of the natives, and the man sitting opposite him made believe

to suck it up with a little mop. Meantime the other men ran round and

round them shouting _wha! wha!_ This was the substance of the play,

which ended as usual by several men placing their hands on the shoulders

of the performers as a signal to them to stop.[149]

[Sidenote: Ceremony of a fish totem.]

Again, to take another Arunta ceremony of a fish totem called

_interpitna_. The fish is the bony bream (_Chatoessus horni_), which

abounds in the water-holes of the country. The play was performed by a

single actor, an old man, whose face was covered with a mass of white

down contrasting strongly with a large bunch of black eagle-hawk

feathers which he wore on his head. His body was decorated with bands of

charcoal edged with white down. Squatting on the ground he moved his

body and extended his arms from his sides, opening and closing them as

he leaned forwards, so as to imitate a fish swelling itself out and

opening and closing its gills. Then, holding twigs in his hands, he

moved along mimicking the action of a man who drives fish before him

with a branch in a pool, just as the natives do to catch the fish.

Meantime an orchestra of four men squatted beside him singing and

beating time with a stick on the ground.[150]

[Sidenote: Ceremony of a plum-tree totem.]

Again, another Arunta ceremony of the plum-tree totem was performed by

four actors, who simply pretended to knock down and eat imaginary plums

from an imaginary plum-tree.[151] An interesting point in this very

simple drama is that in it the men of the plum-tree totem are

represented eating freely of their totem, which is quite contrary to the

practice of the present day, but taken along with many similar

ceremonies it goes far to prove that in the ancient days, to which all

these dramatic ceremonies refer, it was the regular practice for men and

women of a totem to eat their totemic animals or plants. As another

example of a drama in which the performers are represented eating their

totem we may take a ceremony of the ant totem in the Warramunga tribe.

The legendary personages who figure in it are two women of the ant

totem, ancestresses of the ant clan, who are said to have devoted all

their time to catching and eating ants, except when they were engaged in

the performance of ceremonies. The two men who personated these women in

the drama (for no woman is allowed to witness, much less to act in,

these sacred dramas) had the whole of the upper parts of their bodies,

including their faces and the cylindrical helmets which they wore on

their heads, covered with a dense mass of little specks of red down.

These specks stood for the ants, alive or dead, and also for the stones

and trees on the spots where the two women encamped. In the drama the

two actors thus arrayed walked about the ground as if they were

searching for ants to eat. Each of them carried a wooden trough and

stooping down from time to time he turned over the ground and picked up

small stones which he placed in the trough till it was full. The stones

represented the masses of ants which the women gathered for food. After

carrying on this pantomime for a time the two actors pretended to

discover each other with surprise and to embrace with joy, much to the

amusement of the spectators.[152]

[Sidenote: In these ceremonies the action is appropriate to the totem.

Ceremony of the witchetty grub totem.]

In all these ceremonies you will observe that the action of the drama is

strictly appropriate to the totem. In the drama of the Hakea flower

totem the actors pretend to make and drink the beverage brewed from

Hakea flowers; in the ceremony of the fish totem the actor feigns to be

a fish and also to catch fish; in the ceremony of the plum-tree totem

the actors pretend to knock down and eat plums; and in the ceremony of

the ant totem the actors make believe to gather ants for food.

Similarly, to take a few more examples, in a ceremony of the witchetty

grub totem of the Arunta tribe the body of the actor was decorated with

lines of white and red down, and he had a shield adorned with a number

of concentric circles of down. The smaller circles represented the bush

on which the grub lives first of all, and the larger circles represented

the bush on which the adult insect lays its eggs. When all was ready,

the performer seated himself on the ground and imitated the grub,

alternately doubling himself up and rising on his knees, while he

extended his arms and made them quiver in imitation of the insect's

wings; and every now and then he would bend over the shield and sway to

and fro, and up and down, in imitation of the insect hovering over the

bushes on which it lays its eggs.[153] In another ceremony of the

witchetty grub totem, which followed immediately the one I have just

described, the actor had two shields beside him. The smaller of the

shields was ornamented with zigzag lines of white pipe-clay which were

supposed to indicate the tracks of the grub; the larger shield was

covered with larger and smaller series of concentric circles, the larger

representing the seeds of a bush on which the insect feeds, while the

smaller stood for the eggs of the adult insect. As before, the actor

wriggled and flapped his arms in imitation of the fluttering of the

insect when it first leaves its chrysalis case in the ground and

attempts to fly. In acting thus he was supposed to represent a

celebrated ancestor of the witchetty grub totem.[154]

[Sidenote: Ceremony of the emu totem.]

The last example of such ceremonies which I shall cite is one of the emu

totem in the Arunta tribe. The body of the actor was decorated with

perpendicular lines of white down reaching from his shoulders to his

knees; and on his head he supported a towering head-piece tipped with a

bunch of emu feathers in imitation of the neck and head of an emu. Thus

arrayed he stalked backwards and forwards in the aimless fashion of the

bird.[155]

[Sidenote: These dramatic ceremonies were probably at first magical

rites intended to supply the people with food and other necessaries.]

What are we to think of the intention of these little dramas which the

Central Australian aborigines regard as sacred and to the performance of

which they devote so much time and labour? At first sight they are

simply commemorative services, designed to represent the ancestors as

they lived and moved in the far-past times, to recall their adventures,

of which legend has preserved the memory, and to set them dramatically

before the eyes of their living descendants. So far, therefore, the

dramas might be described as purely historical in intention, if not in

reality. But there are reasons for thinking that in all cases a deeper

meaning underlies, or formerly underlay, the performance of all these

apparently simple historical plays; in fact, we may suspect that

originally they were all magical ceremonies observed for the practical

purpose of supplying the people with food, water, sunshine, and

everything else of which they stand in need. This conclusion is

suggested first of all by the practice of the Arunta and other Central

Australian tribes, who observe very similar ceremonies with the avowed

intention of thereby multiplying the totemic animals and plants in order

that they may be eaten by the tribe, though not by the particular clan

which has these animals or plants for its totem. It is true that the

Arunta distinguish these magical ceremonies for the multiplication of

the totems from what we may call the more purely commemorative or

historical performances, and they have a special name for the former,

namely _intichiuma_, which they do not bestow on the latter. Yet these

_intichiuma_ or magical ceremonies resemble the commemorative ceremonies

so closely that it is difficult to suppose they can always have been

wholly distinct. For example, in the magical ceremonies for the

multiplication of witchetty grubs the performers pretend to be the

insects emerging from their chrysalis cases,[156] just as the actors do

in the similar commemorative ceremony which I have described; and again

in a magical ceremony for the multiplication of emus the performers wear

head-dresses to represent the long neck and small head of the bird, and

they mimic its gait,[157] exactly as the actors do in the commemorative

ceremony. It seems reasonable, therefore, to conjecture that the

ceremonies which now are, or seem to be, purely commemorative or

historical were originally magical in intention, being observed for the

practical purpose of multiplying edible animals and plants or supplying

other wants of the tribe.

[Sidenote: Among the Warramunga these dramatic ceremonies are avowedly

performed as magical rites.]

Now this conjecture is strongly confirmed by the actual usage of the

Warramunga tribe, amongst whom the commemorative or historical dramas

are avowedly performed as magical rites: in other words, the Warramunga

attribute a magical virtue to the simple performance of such dramas:

they think that by merely acting the parts of their totemic ancestors

they thereby magically multiply the edible animals or plants which these

ancestors had for their totems. Hence in this tribe the magical

ceremonies and the dramatic performances practically coincide: with

them, as Messrs. Spencer and Gillen say, the _intichiuma_ or magical

ceremonies (called by the Warramunga _thalamminta_) "for the most part

simply consist in the performance of a complete series representing the

_alcheringa_ history of the totemic ancestor. In this tribe each totemic

group has usually one great ancestor, who arose in some special spot and

walked across the country, making various natural features as he did

so,--creeks, plains, ranges, and water-holes,--and leaving behind him

spirit individuals who have since been reincarnated. The _intichiuma_

[or magical] ceremony of the totem really consists in tracking these

ancestors' paths, and repeating, one after the other, ceremonies

commemorative of what are called the _mungai_ spots, the equivalent of

the _oknanikilla_ amongst the Arunta--that is, the places where he left

the spirit children behind."[158] Apparently the Warramunga imagine that

by imitating a totemic ancestor at the very place where he left spirit

children of the same totem behind him, they thereby enable these spirit

children to be born again and so increase the food supply, whenever

their totem is an edible animal or plant; for we must always remember

that in the mind of these savages the idea of a man or woman is

inextricably confused with the idea of his or her totem; they seem

unable to distinguish between the two, and therefore they believe that

in multiplying human beings at their local totemic centres (_mungai_ or

_oknanikilla_) they simultaneously multiply their totems; and as the

totems are commonly edible animals and plants, it follows that in the

opinion of the Warramunga the general effect of performing these

ancestral plays is to increase the supply of food of the tribe. No

wonder, therefore, that the dramas are sacred, and that the natives

attribute the most serious significance to their performance: the

neglect to perform them might, in their judgment, bring famine and ruin

on the whole tribe. As Messrs. Spencer and Gillen, speaking of these

ceremonies, justly observe: "Their proper performance is a matter of

very great importance in the eyes of the natives, because, not only do

they serve to keep alive and hand down from generation to generation the

traditions of the tribe, but they are, at least amongst the Warramunga,

intimately associated with the most important object of maintaining the

food supply, as every totemic group is held responsible for the

maintenance of the material object the name of which it bears."[159]

[Sidenote: General view of the attitude of the Central Australian

natives towards their dead.]

To sum up the attitude of the Central Australian natives towards their

dead. They believe that their dead are constantly undergoing

reincarnation by being born again of women into the world, in fact that

every living man, woman, and child is nothing but a dead person come to

life again, that so it has been from the beginning and that so it will

be to the end. Of a special world of the departed, remote and different

from the material world in which they live and from the familiar scenes

to which they have been accustomed from infancy, they have no

conception; still less, if that is possible, have they any idea of a

division of the world of the dead into a realm of bliss and a realm of

woe, where the spirits of the good live ineffably happy and the spirits

of the bad live unspeakably miserable. To their simple minds the spirits

of the dead dwell all about them in the rocky gorges, the barren plains,

the wooded dells, the rustling trees, the still waters of their native

land, haunting in death the very spots where they last entered into

their mothers' wombs to be born, and where in future they will again

enter into the wombs of other women to be born again as other children

into the world. And so, they think, it will go on for ever and ever.

Such a creed seems at first sight, as I have pointed out, irreconcilable

with a worship of the dead in the proper sense of the word; and so

perhaps it would be, if these savages were strictly consistent and

logical in their theories. But they are not. They admit that their

remote ancestors, in other words, that they themselves in former

incarnations, possessed certain marvellous powers to which in the

present degenerate days they can lay no claim; and in this significant

admission we may detect a rift, a real distinction of kind, between the

living and the dead, which in time might widen out into an impassable

gulf. In other words, we may suppose that the Central Australians, if

left to themselves, might come to hold that the dead return no more to

the land of the living, and that, acknowledging as they do the vast

superiority of their remote ancestors to themselves, they might end by

worshipping them, at first simply as powerful ancestral spirits, and

afterwards as supernatural deities, whose original connexion with

humanity had been totally forgotten. In point of fact we saw that among

the Warramunga the mythical water-snake Wollunqua, who is regarded as an

ancestor of a totemic clan, has made some progress towards deification;

for while he is still regarded as the forefather of the clan which bears

his name, it is no longer supposed that he is born again of women into

the world, but that he lives eternal and invisible under the water of a

haunted pool, and that he has it in his power both to help and to harm

his people, who pray to him and perform ceremonies in his honour. This

awful being, whose voice is heard in the peal of thunder and whose

dreadful name may not be pronounced in common life, is not far from

godhead; at least he is apparently the nearest approach to it which the

imagination of these rude savages has been able to conceive. Lastly, as

I have pointed out, the reverence which the Central Australians

entertain for their dead ancestors is closely bound up with their

totemism; they fail to distinguish clearly or at all between men and

their totems, and accordingly the ceremonies which they perform to

commemorate the dead are at the same time magical rites designed to

ensure an abundant supply of food and of all the other necessaries and

conveniences which savage life requires or admits of; indeed, we may

with some probability conjecture that the magical intention of these

ceremonies is the primary and original one, and that the commemorative

intention is secondary and derivative. If that could be proved to be so

(which is hardly to be expected), we should be obliged to conclude that

in this as in so many enquiries into the remote human past we detect

evidence of an Age of Magic preceding anything that deserves to be

dignified with the name of religion.

That ends what I have to say at present as to the belief in immortality

and the worship of the dead among the Central Australian aborigines. In

my next lecture I propose to pursue the enquiry among the other tribes

of Australia.

[Footnote 137: Spencer and Gillen, _Northern Tribes of Central

Australia_, pp. 228 _sq._]

[Footnote 138: Spencer and Gillen, _Northern Tribes of Central

Australia_, pp. 229 _sq._]

[Footnote 139: Spencer and Gillen, _op. cit._ pp. 230 _sq._]

[Footnote 140: Spencer and Gillen, _Northern Tribes of Central

Australia_, pp. 231-238.]

[Footnote 141: Spencer and Gillen, _op. cit._ p. 238.]

[Footnote 142: Spencer and Gillen, _op. cit._ pp. 238 _sq._]

[Footnote 143: Spencer and Gillen, _Northern Tribes of Central

Australia_, pp. 239-247.]

[Footnote 144: Spencer and Gillen, _op. cit._ p. 248.]

[Footnote 145: "On the other hand there is a great difference between

the Wollunqua and any other totem, inasmuch as the particular animal is

purely mythical, and except for the one great progenitor of the totemic

group, is not supposed to exist at the present day" (Spencer and Gillen,

_Northern Tribes of Central Australia_, p. 248).]

[Footnote 146: The _wingara_ is the equivalent of the Arunta

_alcheringa_, that is, the earliest legendary or mythical times of which

the natives profess to have knowledge.]

The Belief in Immortality and the Worship of the Dead, Volume 1 (of 3) The Belief Among the Aborigines of Australia, the Torres Straits Islands, New Guinea and Melanesia · 第 13 / 51 段