The other, who was ignorant of his master’s purpose, replied--

“Yes, sir, though it were the Duke himself.”

Thereupon the gentleman led him away in such haste as to leave him no

time to take any weapon except a poignard that he was wearing.

The Duke, on hearing the gentleman coming back again, thought that he

was bringing the loved one with him, and, opening his eyes, drew back

the curtains in order to see and welcome the joy for which he had so

long been waiting. But instead of seeing her who, so he hoped, was to

preserve his life, he beheld something intended to take his life away,

that is, a naked sword which the gentleman had drawn, and with which he

smote the Duke. The latter was wearing nothing but his shirt, and lacked

weapons, though not courage, for sitting up in the bed he seized the

gentleman round the body, saying--

“Is this the way you keep your promise?”

Then, armed as he was only with his teeth and nails, he bit the

gentleman’s thumb, and wrestled with him so stoutly that they both fell

down beside the bed.

The gentleman, not feeling altogether confident, called to his servant,

who, finding the Duke and his master so closely twined together that

he could not tell the one from the other, dragged them both by the feet

into the middle of the room, and then tried to cut the Duke’s throat

with his poignard. The Duke defended himself until he was so exhausted

through loss of blood that he could do no more, whereupon the gentleman

and his servant lifted him upon the bed and finished him with their

daggers. They then drew the curtain and went away, leaving the dead body

shut up in the room.

Having vanquished his great enemy, by whose death he hoped to free

his country, the gentleman reflected that his work would be incomplete

unless he treated five or six of the Duke’s kindred in the same fashion.

The servant, however, who was neither a dare-devil nor a fool, said to

him--

“I think, sir, that you have done enough for the present, and that it

would be better to think of saving your own life than of taking the

lives of others, for should we be as long in making away with each of

them as we were in the case of the Duke, daylight would overtake our

enterprise before we could complete it, even should we find our enemies

unarmed.”

Cowed by his guilty conscience, the gentleman followed the advice of his

servant, and taking him alone with him, repaired to a Bishop (4) whose

office it was to have the city gates opened, and to give orders to the

guard-posts.

4 Probably Cardinal Cybo, Alexander’s chief minister, who

according to Sismondi, was the first to discover the

murder.--Ed.

“I have,” said the gentleman to the Bishop, “this evening received

tidings that one of my brothers is at the point of death. I have just

asked leave of the Duke to go to him, and he has granted it me; and

I beg you to send orders that the guards may furnish me with two good

horses, and that the gatekeeper may let me through.”

The Bishop, who regarded the gentleman’s request in the same light as an

order from his master the Duke, forthwith gave him a note, by means of

which the gate was opened for him, and horses supplied to him as he had

requested; but instead of going to see his brother he betook himself

straight to Venice, where he had himself cured of the bites that he had

received from the Duke, and then passed over into Turkey. (5)

5 On leaving Florence, Lorenzo repaired first to Bologna

and then to Venice, where he informed Philip Strozzi of how

he had rid his country of the tyrant. After embracing him in

a transport, and calling him the Tuscan Brutus, Strozzi

asked the murderer’s sisters, Laudamina and Magdalen de’

Medici, in marriage for his own sons, Peter and Robert. From

Venice Lorenzino issued a _mémoire justificatif_, full of

quibbles and paradoxes, in which he tried to explain his

lack of energy after the murder by the indifference shown by

the Florentines. He took no part in the various enterprises

directed against Cosmo de’ Medici, who had succeeded

Alexander at Florence. Indeed his chief concern was for his

own safety, which was threatened alike by Cosmo and the

Emperor Charles V., and to escape their emissaries he

proceeded to Turkey, and thence to France, ultimately

returning to Venice, where, despite all his precautions

against danger, he was assassinated in 1547, together with

his uncle, Soderini, by some spadassins in the pay of Cosmo

I.--Ed.

In the morning, finding that their master delayed his return so long,

all the Duke’s servants suspected, rightly enough, that he had gone to

see some lady; but at last, as he still failed to return, they began

seeking him on all sides. The poor Duchess, who was beginning to love

him dearly, was sorely distressed on learning that he could not be

found; and as the gentleman to whom he bore so much affection was

likewise nowhere to be seen, some went to his house in quest of him.

They found blood on the threshold of the gentleman’s room, which they

entered, but he was not there, nor could any servant or other person

give any tidings of him. Following the blood-stains, however, the Duke’s

servants came at last to the room in which their master lay. The door

of it was locked, but this they soon broke open, and on seeing the floor

covered with blood they drew back the bed-curtain, and found the unhappy

Duke’s body lying in the bed, sleeping the sleep from which one cannot

awaken.

You may imagine the mourning of these poor servants as they carried

the body to the palace, whither came the Bishop, who told them how the

gentleman had departed with all speed during the night under pretence of

going to see his brother. And by this it was clearly shown that it was

he who had committed the murder. And it was further proved that his poor

sister had known nothing whatever of the matter. For her part, albeit

she was astounded by what had happened, she could but love her brother

the more, seeing that he had not shrunk from risking his life in order

to save her from so cruel a tyrant. And so honourable and virtuous was

the life that she continued leading, that although she was reduced to

poverty by the confiscation of the family property, both she and her

sister found as honourable and wealthy husbands as there were in all

Italy, and lived ever afterwards in high and good repute.

“This, ladies, is a story that should make you dread that little god who

delights in tormenting Prince and peasant, strong and weak, and so far

blinds them that they lose all thought of God and conscience, and even

of their own lives. And greatly should Princes and those in authority

fear to offend such as are less than they; for there is no man but can

wreak injury when it pleases God to take vengeance on a sinner, nor any

man so great that he can do hurt to one who is in God’s care.”

This tale was commended by all in the company, (6) but it gave rise

to different opinions among them, for whilst some maintained that the

gentleman had done his duty in saving his own life and his sister’s

honour, as well as in ridding his country of such a tyrant, others

denied this, and said it was rank ingratitude to slay one who had

bestowed on him such wealth and station. The ladies declared that the

gentleman was a good brother and a worthy citizen; the men, on the

contrary, that he was a treacherous and wicked servant.

6 In MS. No. 1520 (Bib. Nat.) this sentence begins: “The

tale was attentively listened to by all,” &c.--L.

And pleasant was it to hear the reasons which were brought forward on

both sides; but the ladies, as is their wont, spoke as much from passion

as from judgment, saying that the Duke was so well worthy of death that

he who struck him down was a happy man indeed.

Then Dagoucin, seeing what a controversy he had set on foot, said to

them--

“In God’s name, ladies, do not quarrel about a thing that is past and

gone. Take care rather that your own charms do not occasion more cruel

murders than the one which I have related.”

“‘La belle Dame sans Mercy,’” (7) replied Parlamente, “has taught us to

say that but few die of so pleasing an ailment.”

7 _La belle Dame sans Merci_ (The Pitiless Beauty) is one

of Alain Chartier’s best known poems. It is written in the

form of a dialogue between a lady and her lover: the former

having obstinately refused to take compassion on the

sufferings of her admirer, the latter is said to have died

of despair. The lines alluded to by Margaret are spoken by

the lady, and are to the following effect--“So graceful a

malady seldom puts men to death; yet the sooner to obtain

comfort, it is fitting one should say that it did. Some

complain and worry greatly who have not really felt the most

bitter affliction; and if indeed Love doth cause such great

torment, surely it were better there should be but one

sufferer rather than two.” The poem, as here quoted, will be

found in André Duchesne’s edition of the _OEuvres de Maistre

Alain Chartier_, Paris, 1617, p. 502.--L.

“Would to God, madam,” answered Dagoucin, “that all the ladies in this

company knew how false that saying is. I think they would then scarcely

wish to be called pitiless, or to imitate that unbelieving beauty who

suffered a worthy lover to die for lack of a gracious answer to his

suit.”

“So,” said Parlamente, “you would have us risk honour and conscience to

save the life of a man who says he loves us.”

“That is not my meaning,” replied Dagoucin, “for he who loves with a

perfect love would be even more afraid of hurting his lady’s honour than

would she herself. I therefore think that an honourable and graceful

response, such as is called for by perfect and seemly love, must tend to

the increase of honour and the satisfaction of conscience, for no true

lover could seek the contrary.”

“That is always the end of your speeches,” said Ennasuite; “they begin

with honour and end with the contrary. However, if all the gentlemen

present will tell the truth of the matter, I am ready to believe them on

their oaths.”

Hircan swore that for his own part he had never loved any woman but

his own wife, and even with her had no desire to be guilty of any gross

offence against God.

Simontault declared the same, and added that he had often wished all

women were froward excepting his own wife.

“Truly,” said Geburon to him, “you deserve that your wife should be what

you would have the others. For my own part, I can swear to you that I

once loved a woman so dearly that I would rather have died than have led

her to do anything that might have diminished my esteem for her. My love

for her was so founded upon her virtues, that for no advantage that I

might have had of her would I have seen them blemished.”

At this Saffredent burst out laughing.

“Geburon,” he said, “I thought that your wife’s affection and your own

good sense would have guarded you from the danger of falling in love

elsewhere, but I see that I was mistaken, for you still use the very

phrases with which we are wont to beguile the most subtle of women, and

to obtain a hearing from the most discreet. For who would close her ears

against us when we begin our discourse by talking of honour and virtue?

(8) But if we were to show them our hearts just as they are, there is

many a man now welcome among the ladies whom they would reckon of but

little account. But we hide the devil in our natures under the most

angelic form we can devise, and in this disguise receive many favours

before we are found out. And perhaps we lead the ladies’ hearts so far

forward, that when they come upon vice while believing themselves on the

high road to virtue, they have neither opportunity nor ability to draw

back again.”

8 This sentence is borrowed from MS. No. 1520 (Bib. Nat.)--

L.

“Truly,” said Geburon, “I thought you a different man than your words

would show you to be, and fancied that virtue was more pleasing to you

than pleasure.”

“What!” said Saffredent. “Is there any virtue greater than that of

loving in the way that God commands? It seems to me that it is much

better to love one woman as a woman than to adore a number of women as

though they were so many idols. For my part, I am firmly of opinion that

use is better than abuse.”

The ladies, however, all sided with Geburon, and would not allow

Saffredent to continue, whereupon he said--

“I am well content to say no more on this subject of love, for I have

been so badly treated with regard to it that I will never return to it

again.”

“It is your own maliciousness,” said Longarine, “that has occasioned

your bad treatment; for what virtuous woman would have you for a lover

after what you have told us?”

“Those who did not consider me unwelcome,” answered Saffredent, “would

not care to exchange their virtue for yours. But let us say no more

about it, that my anger may offend neither myself nor others. Let us see

to whom Dagoucin will give his vote.”

“I give it to Parlamente,” said Dagoucin, “for I believe that she must

know better than any one else the nature of honourable and perfect

love.”

“Since I have been chosen to tell the third tale,” said Parlamente, “I

will tell you something that happened to a lady who has always been one

of my best friends, and whose thoughts have never been hidden from me.”

[Illustration: 117.jpg Tailpiece]

[Illustration: 119a.jpg The Sea-captain talking to the Lady]

[The Sea-captain talking to the Lady]

[Illustration: 119.jpg Page Image]

_TALE XIII_.

_A sea-captain, being greatly in love with a lady, sent her a diamond;

but she despatched it to his wife, whom he had long neglected, and in

this wise so atoned for his conduct that his wife was reconciled to him

in perfect affection_. (1)

1 M. Le Roux de Lincy believes that this story has some

historical basis, and, Louise of Savoy being termed the

Regent, he assigns the earlier incidents to the year 1524.

But Louise was Regent, for the first time, in 1515, and we

incline to the belief that Queen Margaret alludes to this

earlier period. Note the reference to a Court journey to

Normandy (post, p. 136), which was probably the journey that

Francis I. and his mother are known to have made to Rouen

and Alençon in the autumn of 1517. See vol. i. p. xxviii.--

Ed. 2 119

In the household of the Lady-Regent, mother of King Francis, there was

a very pious lady married to a gentleman of like mind with herself, and,

albeit her husband was old and she was young and pretty, she served and

loved him as though he had been the handsomest and youngest man in the

world. So that she might give him no cause for sorrow, she set herself

to live as though she were of the same age as himself, eschewing all

such company, dress, dances, and amusements as young women are wont to

love, and finding all her pleasure and recreation in the service of God;

on which account her husband so loved and trusted her, that she ruled

him and his household as she would.

One day it happened that the gentleman told his wife that from his youth

up he had desired to make a journey to Jerusalem, and asked her what she

thought of it. She, whose only wish was to please him, replied--

“Since God has withheld children from us, sweetheart, and has granted

us sufficient wealth, I would willingly use some portion of it in making

this sacred journey with you, for indeed, whether you go thither or

elsewhere, I am resolved never to leave you.”

At this the good man was so pleased, that it seemed to him as though he

were already on Mount Calvary.

While they were deliberating on this matter, there came to the Court

a gentleman, the Captain of a galley, who had often served in the wars

against the Turks, (2) and was now soliciting the King of France to

undertake an expedition against one of their cities, which might yield

great advantage to Christendom. The old gentleman inquired of him

concerning this expedition, and after hearing what he intended to do,

asked him whether, on the completion of this business, he would make

another journey to Jerusalem, whither he himself and his wife had a

great desire to go. The Captain was well pleased on hearing of this

laudable desire, and he promised to conduct them thither, and to keep

the matter secret.

2 M. Paul Lacroix, who believes that the heroine of this

tale is Margaret herself (she is described as telling it

under the name of Parlamente), is also of opinion that the

gentleman referred to is the Baron de Malleville, a knight

of Malta, who was killed at Beyrout during an expedition

against the Turks, and whose death was recounted in verse by

Clement Marot (_OEuvres_, 1731, vol. ii. p. 452-455).

Margaret’s gentleman, however, is represented as being

married, whereas M. de Malleville, as a knight of Malta, was

necessarily a bachelor. Marot, moreover, calls Malleville a

Parisian, whereas the gentleman in the tale belonged to

Normandy (see _post_, p. 136).--B. J. and L.

The old gentleman was all impatience to find his wife and tell her of

what he had done. She was as anxious to make the journey as her husband,

and on that account often spoke about it to the Captain, who, paying

more attention to her person than her words, fell so deeply in love

with her, that when speaking to her of the voyages he had made, he often

confused the port of Marseilles with the Archipelago, and said “horse”

when he meant to say “ship,” like one distracted and bereft of sense.

Her character, however, was such that he durst not give any token of

the truth, and concealment kindled such fires in his heart that he often

fell sick, when the lady showed as much solicitude for him as for the

cross and guide of her road, (3) sending to inquire after him so often

that the anxiety she showed cured him without the aid of any other

medicine.

3 This may simply be an allusion to wayside crosses which

serve to guide travellers on their road. M. de Montaiglon

points out, however, that in the alphabets used for teaching

children in the olden time, the letter A was always preceded

by a cross, and that the child, in reciting, invariably

began: “The cross of God, A, B, C, D,” &c. In a like way, a

cross figured at the beginning of the guide-books of the

time, as a symbol inviting the traveller to pray, and

reminding him upon whom he should rely amid the perils of

his journey. The best known French guide-book of the

sixteenth century is Charles Estienne’s _Guide des Chemins

de France_.--M. and Ed.

Several persons who knew that this Captain had been more renowned for

valour and jollity than for piety, were amazed that he should have

become so intimate with this lady, and seeing that he had changed in

every respect, and frequented churches, sermons, and confessions, they

suspected that this was only in order to win the lady’s favour, and

could not refrain from hinting as much to him.

The Captain feared that if the lady should hear any such talk he would

be banished from her presence, and accordingly he told her husband and

herself that he was on the point of being despatched on his journey by

the King, and had much to tell them, but that for the sake of greater

secrecy he did not desire to speak to them in the presence of others,

for which reason he begged them to send for him when they had both

retired for the night. The gentleman deemed this to be good advice, and

did not fail to go to bed early every evening, and to make his wife also

undress. When all their servants had left them, they used to send for

the Captain, and talk with him about the journey to Jerusalem, in the

midst of which the old gentleman would oft-times fall asleep with his

mind full of pious thoughts. When the Captain saw the old gentleman

asleep in bed, and found himself on a chair near her whom he deemed the

fairest and noblest woman in the world, his heart was so rent between

his desires and his dread of speaking that he often lost the power

of speech. In order that she might not perceive this, he would force

himself to talk of the holy places of Jerusalem where there were such

signs of the great love that Jesus Christ bore us; and he would speak of

this love, using it as a cloak for his own, and looking at the lady

with sighs and tears which she never understood. By reason of his devout

countenance she indeed believed him to be a very holy man, and begged of

him to tell her what his life had been, and how he had come to love God

in that way.

He told her that he was a poor gentleman, who, to arrive at riches and

honour, had disregarded his conscience in marrying a woman who was too

close akin to him, and this on account of the wealth she possessed,

albeit she was ugly and old, and he loved her not; and when he had drawn

all her money from her, he had gone to seek his fortune at sea, and had

so prospered by his toil, that he had now come to an honourable estate.

But since he had made his hearer’s acquaintance, she, by reason of her

pious converse and good example, had changed all his manner of life, and

should he return from his present enterprise he was wholly resolved to

take her husband and herself to Jerusalem, that he might thereby partly

atone for his grievous sins which he had now put from him; save that he

had not yet made reparation to his wife, with whom, however, he hoped

that he might soon be reconciled.

The lady was well pleased with this discourse, and especially rejoiced

at having drawn such a man to the love and fear of God. And thus, until

the Captain departed from the Court, their long conversations together

were continued every evening without his ever venturing to declare

himself. However, he made the lady a present of a crucifix of Our Lady

of Pity, (4) beseeching her to think of him whenever she looked upon it.

4 “Our Lady of Pity” is the designation usually applied to

the Virgin when she is shown seated with the corpse of

Christ on her knees. Michael Angelo’s famous group at St.

Peter’s is commonly known by this name. In the present

instance, however, Queen Margaret undoubtedly refers to a

crucifix showing the Virgin at the foot of the Cross,

contemplating her son’s sufferings. Such crucifixes were

formerly not uncommon.--M.

The hour of his departure arrived, and when he had taken leave of the

husband, who was falling asleep, and came to bid his lady farewell, he

beheld tears standing in her eyes by reason of the honourable affection

which she entertained for him. The sight of these rendered his passion

for her so unendurable that, not daring to say anything concerning it,

he almost fainted, and broke out into an exceeding sweat, so that he

seemed to weep not only with his eyes, but with his entire body.

And thus he departed without speaking, leaving the lady in great

astonishment, for she had never before seen such tokens of regret.

Nevertheless she did not change in her good opinion of him, and followed

him with her prayers.

After a month had gone by, however, as the lady was returning to her

house, she met a gentleman who handed her a letter from the Captain, and

begged her to read it in private.

He told her how he had seen the Captain embark, fully resolved to

accomplish whatever might be pleasing to the King and of advantage to

Christianity. For his own part, the gentleman added, he was straightway

going back to Marseilles to set the Captain’s affairs in order.

The lady withdrew to a window by herself, and opening the letter,

found it to consist of two sheets of paper, covered on either side with

writing which formed the following epistle:--

“Concealment long and silence have, alas!

Brought me all comfortless to such a pass,

That now, perforce, I must, to ease my grief,

Either speak out, or seek in death relief.

Wherefore the tale I long have left untold

I now, in lonely friendlessness grown bold,

Send unto thee, for I must strive to say

My love, or else prepare myself to slay.

And though my eyes no longer may behold

The sweet, who in her hand my life doth hold,

Whose glance sufficed to make my heart rejoice,

The while my ear did listen to her voice,--

These words at least shall meet her beauteous eyes,

And tell her all the plaintive, clamorous cries

Pent in my heart, to which I must give breath,

Since longer silence could but bring me death.

And yet, at first, I was in truth full fain

To blot the words I’d written out again,

Fearing, forsooth, I might offend thine ear

With foolish phrases which, when thou wast near,

I dared not utter; and ‘Indeed,’ said I,

‘Far better pine in silence, aye, and die,

Than save myself by bringing her annoy

For whose sweet sake grim death itself were joy.’

And yet, thought I, my death some pain might give

To her for whom I would be strong, and live:

For have I not, fair lady, promised plain,

My journey ended, to return again

And guide thee and thy spouse to where he now

Doth yearn to call on God from Sion’s brow?

And none would lead thee thither should I die.

If I were dead, methinks I see thee sigh

In sore distress, for then thou couldst not start

Upon that journey, dear unto thy heart.

So I will live, and, in a little space,

Return to lead thee to the sacred place.

Aye, I will live, though death a boon would be

Only to be refused for sake of thee.

But if I live, I needs must straight remove

The burden from my heart, and speak my love,

That love more loyal, tender, deep, and true,

Than, ever yet, the fondest lover knew.

And now, bold words about to wing your flight,

What will ye say when ye have reached her sight?

Declare her all the love that fills my heart?

Too weak ye are to tell its thousandth part!

Can ye at least not say that her clear eyes

Have torn my hapless heart forth in such wise,

That like a hollow tree I pine and wither

Unless hers give me back some life and vigour?

Ye feeble words! ye cannot even tell

How easily her eyes a heart compel;

Nor can ye praise her speech in language fit,

So weak and dull ye are, so void of wit.

Yet there are some things I would have you name--

How mute and foolish I oft time became

When all her grace and virtue I beheld;

How from my ‘raptured eyes tears slowly welled

The tears of hopeless love; how my tongue strayed

From fond and wooing speech, so sore afraid,

That all my discourse was of time and tide,

And of the stars which up in Heav’n abide.

O words, alas! ye lack the skill to tell

The dire confusion that upon me fell,

Whilst love thus wracked me; nor can ye disclose

My love’s immensity, its pains and woes.

Yet, though, for all, your powers be too weak,

Perchance, some little, ye are fit to speak--

Say to her thus: “Twas fear lest thou shouldst chide

That drove me, e’en so long, my love to hide,

And yet, forsooth, it might have openly

Been told to God in Heaven, as unto thee,

Based as it is upon thy virtue--thought

That to my torments frequent balm hath brought,

For who, indeed, could ever deem it sin

To seek the owner of all worth to win?

Deserving rather of our blame were he

Who having seen thee undisturbed could be.’

None such was I, for, straightway stricken sore,

My heart bowed low to Love, the conqueror.

And ah! no false and fleeting love is mine,

Such as for painted beauty feigns to pine;

Nor doth my passion, although deep and strong,

Seek its own wicked pleasure in thy wrong.

Nay; on this journey I would rather die

Than know that thou hadst fallen, and that I

Had wrought thy shame and foully brought to harm

The virtue which thy heart wraps round thy form.

‘Tis thy perfection that I love in thee,

Nought that might lessen it could ever be

Desire of mine--indeed, the nobler thou,

The greater were the love I to thee vow.

I do not seek an ardent flame to quench

In lustful dalliance with some merry wench,

Pure is my heart, ‘neath reason’s calm control

Set on a lady of such lofty soul,

That neither God above nor angel bright,

But seeing her, would echo my delight.

And if of thee I may not be beloved,

What matter, shouldst thou deem that I have proved

The truest lover that did ever live?

And this I know thou wilt, one day, believe,

For time, in rolling by, shall show to thee

No change in my heart’s faith and loyalty.

And though for this thou mayst make no return,

Yet pleased am I with love for thee to burn,

And seek no recompense, pursue no end,

Save, that to thee, I meekly recommend

My soul and body, which I here consign

In sacrifice to Love’s consuming shrine.

If then in safety I sail back the main

To thee, still artless, I’ll return again;

And if I die, then there will die with me

A lover such as none again shall see.

So Ocean now doth carry far away

The truest lover seen for many a day;

His body ‘tis that journeys o’er the wave,

But not his heart, for that is now thy slave,

And from thy side can never wrested be,

Nor of its own accord return to me.

Ah! could I with me o’er the treach’rous brine

Take aught of that pure, guileless heart of thine,

No doubt should I then feel of victory,

Whereof the glory would belong to thee.

But now, whatever fortune may befall,

I’ve cast the die; and having told thee all,

Abide thereby, and vow my constancy--

Emblem of which, herein, a diamond see,

By whose great firmness and whose pure glow

The strength and pureness of my love thou’lt know.

Let it, I pray, thy fair white finger press,

And thou wilt deal me more than happiness.

And, diamond, speak and say: ‘To thee I come

From thy fond lover, who afar doth roam,

And strives by dint of glorious deeds to rise

To the high level of the good and wise,

Hoping some day that haven to attain,

Where thy sweet favours shall reward his pain.”

The lady read the letter through, and was the more astonished at the

Captain’s passion as she had never before suspected it. She looked at

the cutting of the diamond, which was a large and beautiful one, set in

a ring of black enamel, and she was in great doubt as to what she ought

to do with it. After pondering upon the matter throughout the night, she

was glad to find that since there was no messenger, she had no occasion

to send any answer to the Captain, who, she reflected, was being

sufficiently tried by those matters of the King, his master, which he

had in hand, without being angered by the unfavourable reply which she

was resolved to make to him, though she delayed it until his return.

However, she found herself greatly perplexed with regard to the diamond,

for she had never been wont to adorn herself at the expense of any but

her husband. For this reason, being a woman of excellent understanding,

she determined to draw from the ring some profit to the Captain’s

conscience. She therefore despatched one of her servants to the

Captain’s wife with the following letter, which was written as though it

came from a nun of Tarascon:--

“MADAM,--Your husband passed this way but a short time before he

embarked, and after he had confessed himself and received his Creator

like a good Christian, he spoke to me of something which he had upon his

conscience, namely, his sorrow at not having loved you as he should

have done. And on departing, he prayed and besought me to send you this

letter, with the diamond which goes with it, and which he begs of you

to keep for his sake, assuring you that if God bring him back again in

health and strength, you shall be better treated than ever woman was

before. And this stone of steadfastness shall be the pledge thereof.

“I beg you to remember him in your prayers; in mine he will have a place

as long as I live.”

This letter, being finished and signed with the name of a nun, was sent

by the lady to the Captain’s wife. And as may be readily believed, when

the excellent old woman saw the letter and the ring, she wept for joy

and sorrow at being loved and esteemed by her good husband when she

could no longer see him. She kissed the ring a thousand times and more,

watering it with her tears, and blessing God for having restored her

husband’s affection to her at the end of her days, when she had long

looked upon it as lost. Nor did she fail to thank the nun who had given

her so much happiness, but sent her the fairest reply that she could

devise. This the messenger brought back with all speed to his mistress,

who could not read it, nor listen to what her servant told her, without

much laughter. And so pleased was she at having got rid of the diamond

in so profitable a fashion as to bring about a reconciliation between

the husband and wife, that she was as happy as though she had gained a

kingdom.

A short time afterwards tidings came of the defeat and death of the poor

Captain, and of how he had been abandoned by those who ought to have

succoured him, and how his enterprise had been revealed by the Rhodians

who should have kept it secret, so that he and all who landed with him,

to the number of eighty, had been slain, among them being a gentleman

named John, and a Turk to whom the lady of my story had stood godmother,

both of them having been given by her to the Captain that he might take

them with him on his journey. The first named of these had died beside

the Captain, whilst the Turk, wounded by arrows in fifteen places, had

saved himself by swimming to the French ships.

It was through him alone that the truth of the whole affair became

known. A certain gentleman whom the poor Captain had taken to be his

friend and comrade, and whose interests he had advanced with the King

and the highest nobles of France, had, it appeared, stood out to sea

with his ships as soon as the Captain landed; and the Captain, finding

that his expedition had been betrayed, and that four thousand Turks were

at hand, had thereupon endeavoured to retreat, as was his duty. But the

gentleman in whom he put such great trust perceived that his friend’s

death would leave the sole command and profit of that great armament to

himself, and accordingly pointed out to the officers that it would not

be right to risk the King’s vessels or the lives of the many brave men

on board them in order to save less than a hundred persons, an opinion

which was shared by all those of the officers that possessed but little

courage.

So the Captain, finding that the more he called to the ships the farther

they drew away from his assistance, faced round at last upon the Turks;

and, albeit he was up to his knees in sand, he did such deeds of arms

and valour that it seemed as though he alone would defeat all his

enemies, an issue which his traitorous comrade feared far more than he

desired it.

But at last, in spite of all that he could do, the Captain received

so many wounds from the arrows of those who durst not approach within

bowshot, that he began to lose all his blood, whereupon the Turks,

perceiving the weakness of these true Christians, charged upon them

furiously with their scimitars; but the Christians, so long as God gave

them strength and life, defended themselves to the bitter end.

Then the Captain called to the gentleman named John, whom his lady love

had given him, and to the Turk as well, and thrusting the point of his

sword into the ground, fell upon his knees beside it, and embraced and

kissed the cross, (5) saying--

“Lord, receive into Thy hands the soul of one who has not spared his

life to exalt Thy name.”

5 As is well known, before swords were made with shell and

stool hilts, the two guards combined with the handle and

blade formed a cross. Bayard, when dying, raised his sword

to gaze upon this cross, and numerous instances, similar to

that mentioned above by Queen Margaret, may be found in the

old _Chansons de Geste_.--M.

The gentleman called John, seeing that his master’s life was ebbing away

as he uttered these words, thought to aid him, and took him into his

arms, together with the sword which he was holding. But a Turk who was

behind them cut through both his thighs, whereupon he cried out, “Come,

Captain, let us away to Paradise to see Him for whose sake we die,” and

in this wise he shared the poor Captain’s death even as he had shared

his life.

The Turk, seeing that he could be of no service to either of them, and

being himself wounded by arrows in fifteen places, made off towards

the ships, and requested to be taken on board. But although of all the

eighty he was the only one who had escaped, the Captain’s traitorous

comrade refused his prayer. Nevertheless, being an exceeding good

swimmer, he threw himself into the sea, and exerted himself so well that

he was at last received on board a small vessel, where in a short time

he was cured of his wounds. And it was by means of this poor foreigner

that the truth became fully known, to the honour of the Captain and the

shame of his comrade, whom the King and all the honourable people who

heard the tidings deemed guilty of such wickedness toward God and man

that there was no death howsoever cruel which he did not deserve. But

when he returned he told so many lies, and gave so many gifts, that not

only did he escape punishment, but even received the office of the man

whose unworthy servant he had been.

When the pitiful tidings reached the Court, the Lady-Regent, who held

the Captain in high esteem, mourned for him exceedingly, as did the King

and all the honourable people who had known him. And when the lady whom

he had loved the best heard of his strange, sad, and Christian death,

she changed the chiding she had resolved to give him into tears and

lamentations, in which her husband kept her company, all hopes of their

journey to Jerusalem being now frustrated.

I must not forget to say that on the very day when the two gentlemen

were killed, a damsel in the lady’s service, who loved the gentleman

called John better than herself, came and told her mistress that she had

seen her lover ir a dream; he had appeared to her clad in white, and had

bidden her farewell, telling her that he was going to Paradise with his

Captain. And when the damsel heard that her dream had come true, she

made such lamentation that her mistress had enough to do to comfort her.

(6)

6 The Queen of Navarre was a firm believer in the truth and

premonitory character of dreams, and according to her

biographers she, herself, had several singular ones, two of

which are referred to in the Memoir prefixed to the present

work (vol. i. pp. lxxxiii. and Ixxxvii.). In some of her

letters, moreover, she relates that Francis I., when under

the walls of Pavia, on three successive nights beheld his

little daughter Charlotte (then dying at Lyons) appear to

him in a dream, and on each occasion repeat the words,

“Farewell, my King, I am going to Paradise.”--Ed.

A short time afterwards the Court journeyed into Normandy, to which

province the Captain had belonged. His wife was not remiss in coming to

pay homage to the Lady-Regent, and in order that she might be presented

to her, she had recourse to the same lady whom her husband had so dearly

loved.

And while they were waiting in a church for the appointed hour, she

began bewailing and praising her husband, saying among other things to

the lady--

“Alas, madam! my misfortune is the greatest that ever befell a woman,

for just when he was loving me more than he had ever done, God took him

from me.”

So saying, and with many tears, she showed the ring which she wore on

her finger as a token of her husband’s perfect love, whereat the other

lady, finding that her deception had resulted in such a happy issue,

was, despite her sorrow for the Captain’s death, so moved to laughter,

that she would not present the widow to the Regent, but committed her to

the charge of another lady, and withdrew into a side chapel, where she

satisfied her inclination to laugh.

“I think, ladies, that those who receive such gifts ought to seek to use

them to as good a purpose as did this worthy lady. They would find that

benefactions bring joy to those who bestow them. And we must not charge

this lady with deceit, but esteem her good sense which turned to good

that which in itself was worthless.”

“Do you mean to say,” said Nomerfide, “that a fine diamond, costing two

hundred crowns, is worthless? I can assure you that if it had fallen

into my hands, neither his wife nor his relations would have seen aught

of it. Nothing is more wholly one’s own than a gift. The gentleman was

dead, no one knew anything about the matter, and she might well have

spared the poor old woman so much sorrow.”

“By my word,” said Hircan, “you are right. There are women who, to

make themselves appear of better heart than others, do things that are

clearly contrary to their notions, for we all know that women are

the most avaricious of beings, yet their vanity often surpasses their

avarice, and constrains their hearts to actions that they would rather

not perform. My belief is that the lady who gave the diamond away in

this fashion was unworthy to wear it.”

“Softly, softly,” said Oisille; “I believe I know who she is, and I

therefore beg that you will not condemn her unheard.”

“Madam,” said Hircan, “I do not condemn her at all; but if the gentleman

was as virtuous as you say, it were an honour to have such a lover, and

to wear his ring; but perhaps some one less worthy of being loved than

he held her so fast by the finger that the ring could not be put on.”

“Truly,” said Ennasuite, “she might well have kept it, seeing that no

one knew anything about it.”

“What!” said Geburon; “are all things lawful to those who love, provided

no one knows anything about them?”

“By my word,” said Saffredent, “the only misdeed that I have ever seen

punished is foolishness. There is never a murderer, robber, or adulterer

condemned by the courts or blamed by his fellows, if only he be as

cunning as he is wicked. Oft-time, however, a bad man’s wickedness so

blinds him that he becomes a fool; and thus, as I have just said, it is

the foolish only that are punished, not the vicious.”

“You may say what you please,” said Oisille, “only God can judge the

lady’s heart; but for my part, I think that her action was a very

honourable and virtuous one. (7) However, to put an end to the debate, I

pray you, Parlamente, to give some one your vote.”

7 In our opinion this sentence disposes of Miss Mary

Robinson’s supposition (_The Fortunate Lovers_, London,

1887, p. 159) that Oisille (i.e., Louise of Savoy) is the

real heroine of this tale. Queen Margaret would hardly have

represented her commending her own action. If any one of the

narrators of the _Heptameron_ be the heroine of the story,

the presumptions are in favour of Longarine (La Dame de

Lonray), Margaret’s bosom friend, whose silence during the

after-converse is significant.--Ed.

“I give it willingly,” she said, “to Simontault, for after two such

mournful tales we must have one that will not make us weep.”

“I thank you,” said Simontault. “In giving me your vote you have all but

told me that I am a jester. It is a name that is extremely distasteful

to me, and in revenge I will show you that there are women who with

certain persons, or for a certain time, make a great pretence of being

chaste, but the end shows them in their real colours, as you will see by

this true story.”

[Illustration: 140.jpg Tailpiece]

[Illustration: 141a.jpg Bonnivet and the Lady of Milan]

[Bonnivet and the Lady of Milan]

[Illustration: 141.jpg Page Image]

_TALE XIV_.

_The Lord of Bonnivet, desiring to revenge himself upon a

Milanese lady for her cruelty, made the acquaintance of an

Italian gentleman whom she loved, but to whom she had never

granted anything save fair words and assurances of

affection. To accomplish his purpose he gave this gentleman

such good advice that the lady granted him what he had so

long sought, and this the gentleman made known to Bonnivet,

who, having cut both hair and beard, and dressed himself in

clothes like those of the other, went at midnight and put

his vengeance into execution. Then the lady, having learnt

from him the plan that he had devised to win her, promised

to desist from loving those of her own nation, and to hold

fast to him_.

At the time when the Grand-Master of Chaumont was Governor of the Duchy

of Milan, (1) there lived there a gentleman called the Lord of Bonnivet,

who by reason of his merits was afterwards made Admiral of France. Being

greatly liked by the Grand-Master and every one else on account of the

qualities he possessed, he was a welcome guest at the banquets where

the ladies of Milan assembled, and was regarded by them with more favour

than ever fell to a Frenchman’s lot, either before or since; and this

as much on account of his handsome countenance, grace of manner, and

pleasant converse, as by reason of the renown which he had gained among

all as being one of the most skilful and valorous soldiers of his time.

(2)

1 M. de Lincy is of opinion that the incidents recorded in

this story took place between 1501 and 1503; but according

to M. Lacroix, the Grand-Master of Chaumont did not become

Governor of the Milanese till 1506. This personage, to whom

Queen Margaret frequently alludes in her tales, was Charles

d’Amboise, nephew of the famous Cardinal d’Amboise, minister

to Louis XII. In turn admiral and marshal, Governor of

Paris, and Grand-Master, in France, of the Order of St. John

of Jerusalem, he figured prominently in the Italian wars of

the time, and notably at the battle of Aignadel. In 1510 he

commanded the troops which fought on behalf of the Duke of

Ferrara against the Emperor and Pope Julius II., and the

latter having excommunicated him for bearing arms against

the Holy See, his mind is said to have become unhinged. He

died at Correggio in February 1511, when only thirty-eight

years of age, some biographers asserting that he was

poisoned, whilst others contend that he fell from a bridge

during a military expedition. Whilst on his death-bed, he

sent messengers to the Pope, begging that the decree of

excommunication against him might be annulled, but before

the Papal absolution arrived he had expired. The name of

Chaumont, by which he is generally known, is that of an

estate he possessed, between Blois and Amboise, on the

Loire. The reputation he enjoyed of being one of the

handsomest men of his time was well deserved, if one may

judge by a painting at the Louvre which is said to be his

portrait. This picture, long ascribed to Leonardo da Vinci,

and supposed to represent Charles VIII. of France, has been

identified as the work of Andreas Solario, who executed

numerous paintings for Cardinal d’Amboise at the famous

château of Gaillon.--L. M. and Eu.

2 Some particulars concerning William Gouffier, Lord of

Bonnivet, have been given in vol. i. (Tale IV. n. 3). It

may here be mentioned that the domain whence he derived the

name by which he is generally known was in the neighbourhood

of Poitiers, around the village of Vendeuvre, where he built

himself a vast château, destroyed at the close of the

eighteenth century. Some fragments of the sculptured work

adorning it, remarkable for their elegance of design and

delicacy of workmanship, are in the Poitiers Museum. It is

not unlikely that the incidents related in Tale IV. occurred

at this château; or else at that of Oiron, another domain of

the Gouffiers, between Loudun and Bressuire. In the chapel

of Oiron were buried Bonnivet, his mother, his brother

Artus, and his nephew Claud. Their tombs, large marble

mausoleums of Italian workmanship, surmounted by recumbent

statues, were opened and mutilated by the Huguenots in 1568,

when the bones they contained were scattered to the winds.

Bon-nivet’s statue is probably the most damaged of the four.

The château of Oiron, with its marble staircases, quaint

frescoes, sculptured medallions, &c, testifies to the great

wealth possessed by the Gouffier family, and justifies the

cynical motto assumed by Bonnivet’s nephew: “Others have

beaten the bushes, but we have the birds.”--Ed.

One day during the carnival, when he was among the maskers, he danced

with one of the most beautiful and bravely attired ladies to be found

in the whole city; and whenever a pause occurred in the music of the

hautboys, he did not fail to address her with love speeches, in which he

excelled all others. But she (3) having no favourable reply to give him,

suddenly checked his discourse by assuring him that she neither loved

nor ever would love any man but her husband, and that he must by no

means expect that she would listen to him.

3 This lady may perhaps be the “Sennora Clerice” (Clarissa)

of whom Brantôme writes as follows in his _Capitaines

François_:--“It was Bonnivet alone who advised King Francis

to cross the mountains and follow M. de Bourbon, and in this

he had less his master’s advantage and service at heart than

his desire to return and see a great and most beautiful lady

of Milan, whom he had made his mistress some years

previously.... It is said that this was the ‘Sennora

Clerice,’ then accounted one of the most beautiful ladies of

Italy.... A great lady of the time, from whom I heard this

story, told me that he, Bonnivet, had commended this lady

Clerice to the King so highly as to make him desirous of

seeing and winning her; and this was the principal cause of

this expedition of the King’s.”--Lalanne’s _OEuvres de

Brantôme_, vol. ii. p. 167-8.--L.

The gentleman, however, would not take this answer for a refusal, and

continued to press his suit with great energy until mid-Lent. But he

found her still firm in her declaration that she would love neither

himself nor another, which he could not believe, however, seeing how

ill-favoured was her husband, and how great her own beauty. Convinced

that she was practising dissimulation, he resolved, on his own side, to

have recourse to deception, and accordingly he ceased to urge his suit,

and inquired so closely concerning her manner of life that he discovered

she was in love with a most discreet and honourable Italian gentleman.

Little by little the Lord of Bonnivet insinuated himself into the

friendship of this gentleman, and did so with so much discretion and

skill, that the other remained ignorant of his motive, and became so

much attached to him that, after the lady of his heart, there was no one

in the world whom he loved more. In order that he might pluck his secret

from his breast, the Lord of Bonnivet pretended to tell him his own,

declaring that he loved a certain lady to whom he had in truth never

given a thought, and begging that he would keep the matter secret, and

that they might have but one heart and one mind together. Wishing to

show in return a like affection, the poor Italian gentleman thereupon

proceeded to disclose at length the love that he bore the lady on whom

Bonnivet wished to be revenged; and after this they would meet somewhere

once every day in order to recount the favours that had befallen them

during the past four and twenty hours; with this difference, however,

that one lied, and the other spoke the truth. And the Italian confessed

that he had loved this lady for three years, but had never obtained

anything of her save fair words and the assurance of her love.

Bonnivet then gave him all the advice that he could to enable him to

attain his end, and to such good purpose that in a few days the lady

consented to grant all that was sought of her. It only remained to

devise a plan for their meeting, and through the counsels of Bonnivet

this was soon accomplished. And so one day before supper the Italian

said to him--

“I am more beholden to you, sir, than to any other man living, for,

thanks to your good advice, I expect to obtain to-night that which I

have coveted so many years.”

“I pray you, my friend,” thereupon said Bonnivet, “tell me the manner of

your undertaking, so that if there be any risk in it, or craft required,

I may serve you in all friendship.”

The Italian gentleman then began to tell him that the lady had devised

a means of having the principal door of the house left open that night,

availing herself as a pretext of the illness of one of her brothers for

whose requirements it was necessary to send into the town at all hours.

He might enter the courtyard, but he was to be careful not to go up by

the principal staircase. Instead of this he was to take a small flight

on his right hand, and enter the first gallery he came to, into which

the rooms of the lady’s father-in-law and brothers-in-law opened; and

he was to choose the third door from the head of the stairs, and if on

trying it gently he found that it was locked, he was to go away again,

for in that case he might be sure that her husband had returned, though

not expected back for two days. If, however, he found that the door was

open, he was to enter softly, and boldly bolt it behind him, for in that

case there would be none but herself in the room. And above all, he was

to get himself felt shoes, in order that he might make no noise, and he

was to be careful not to come earlier than two hours after midnight,

for her brothers-in-law, who were fond of play, never went to bed until

after one of the clock.

“Go, my friend,” replied Bonnivet, “and may God be with you and preserve

you from mischief. If my company can be of any service to you, I am

wholly at your disposal.”

The Italian gentleman thanked him warmly, but said that in an affair of

this nature he could not be too much alone; and thereupon he went away

to set about his preparations.

Bonnivet, on his part, did not go to sleep, for he saw that the time had

come for revenging himself upon his cruel love. Going home betimes, he

had his beard trimmed to the same length and breadth as the Italian’s,

and also had his hair cut, so that, on touching him, no difference

between himself and his rival might be perceived. Nor did he forget the

felt shoes, nor garments such as the Italian was wont to wear. Being

greatly liked by the lady’s father-in-law, he was not afraid to go to

the house at an early hour, for he made up his mind that if he were

perceived, he would go straight to the chamber of the old gentleman,

with whom he had some business on hand.

About midnight he entered the lady’s house, and although there were a

good many persons going to and fro, he passed them unnoticed and thus

reached the gallery. Trying the first two doors, he found them shut; the

third, however, was not, and he softly pushed it open. And having thus

entered the lady’s room, he immediately bolted the door behind him. He

found that the whole chamber was hung with white linen, the floor and

ceiling also being covered with the same; and there was a bed draped

with cloth so fine and soft and so handsomely embroidered in white, that

nothing better were possible. And in the bed lay the lady alone, wearing

her cap and night-gown, and covered with pearls and gems. This, before

he was himself perceived by her, he was able to see by peeping round the

curtain; for there was a large wax candle burning, which made the room

as bright as day. And fearful lest he should be recognised by her, he

first of all put out the light. Then he undressed himself and got into

bed beside her.

The lady, taking him to be the Italian who had so long loved her, gave

him the best possible reception; but he, not forgetting that he was

there in another’s stead, was careful not to say a single word. His

only thought was to execute his vengeance at the cost of her honour and

chastity without being beholden to her for any boon. And although this

was contrary to her intention, the lady was so well pleased with this

vengeance that she deemed him rewarded for all she thought he had

endured. At last it struck one of the clock, and it was time to say

good-bye. Then, in the lowest tones he could employ, he asked her if she

were as well pleased with him as he was with her. She, believing him

to be her lover, said that she was not merely pleased but amazed at the

greatness of his love, which had kept him an hour without answering her.

The Tales of the Heptameron, Vol. 2 (of 5) · 第 37 / 54 题