VIII.

The instruction at school was out of date, inasmuch as, in every

branch, it lacked intelligibility. The masters were also necessarily,

in some instances, anything but perfect, even when not lacking in

knowledge of their subject. Nevertheless, the instruction as a whole,

especially when one bears in mind how cheap it was, must be termed

good, careful and comprehensive; as a rule it was given

conscientiously. When as a grown up man I have cast my thoughts back,

what has surprised me most is the variety of subjects that were

instilled into a boy in ten years. There certainly were teachers so

lacking in understanding of the proper way to communicate knowledge

that the instruction they gave was altogether wasted. For instance, I

learnt geometry for four or five years without grasping the simplest

elements of the science. The principles of it remained so foreign to me

that I did not even recognise a right-angled triangle, if the right

angle were uppermost. It so happened that the year before I had to sit

for my examinations, a young University student in his first year, who

had been only one class in front of the rest of us, offered us

afternoon instruction in trigonometry and spherical geometry gratis,

and all who appreciated the help that was being offered to them

streamed to his lessons. This young student, later Pastor Jörgen Lund,

had a remarkable gift for mathematics, and gave his instruction with a

lucidity, a fire, and a swing that carried his hearers with him. I, who

had never before been able to understand a word of the subject, became

keenly interested in it, and before many lessons were over was very

well up in it. As Jörgen Lund taught mathematics, so all the other

subjects ought to have been taught. We were obliged to be content with

less.

Lessons might have been a pleasure. They never were, or rather, only

the Danish ones. But in childhood's years, and during the first years

of boyhood they were fertilising. As a boy they hung over me like a

dread compulsion; yet the compulsion was beneficial. It was only when I

was almost fourteen that I began inwardly to rebel against the time

which was wasted, that the stupidest and laziest of the boys might be

enabled to keep up with the industrious and intelligent. There was too

much consideration shown towards those who would not work or could not

understand. And from the time I was sixteen, school was my despair. I

had done with it all, was beyond it all, was too matured to submit to

the routine of lessons; my intellectual pulses no longer beat within

the limits of school. What absorbed my interest was the endeavour to

become master of the Danish language in prose and verse, and musings

over the mystery of existence. In school I most often threw up the

sponge entirely, and laid my head on my arms that I might neither see

nor hear what was going on around me.

There was another reason, besides my weariness of it all, which at this

latter period made my school-going a torture to me. I was by now

sufficiently schooled for my sensible mother to think it would be good

for me to make, if it were but a small beginning, towards earning my

own living. Or rather, she wanted me to earn enough to pay for my

amusements myself. So I tried, with success, to find pupils, and gave

them lessons chiefly on Sunday mornings; but in order to secure them I

had called myself _Studiosus_. Now it was an ever present terror with

me lest I should meet any of my pupils as I went to school in the

morning, or back at midday, with my books in a strap under my arm. Not

to betray myself, I used to stuff these books in the most extraordinary

places, inside the breast of my coat till it bulged, and in all my

pockets till they burst.

Recollections of My Childhood and Youth · 第 46 / 205 题