States, from the Gulf of Mexico on the south and the Atlantic on the
east to the Rocky Mountains, and is met with as far to the north as
the 61st parallel of latitude. Sir John Richardson found it common in
the fur countries, being the only Woodpecker that visits those regions
in flocks. He observed the Yellow-bellied Woodpecker on the north
shore of Lake Huron on the 14th of April, in 1825, and in 1827 it made
its first appearance for the season, on the plains of the
Saskatchewan, on the 14th of May. Swainson received specimens of this
Woodpecker from Mexico. De la Sagra and Dr. Gundlach both give it in
their list of Cuban birds, though not as breeding on that island.
Gosse obtained several specimens in the months of December, January,
and February, in Jamaica, where he regarded it as only a winter
migrant from the northern continent. It is not given by the Newtons
among the birds of St. Croix, but appears in Sclater’s list of the
birds of Central America, on the authority of Mr. George M. Skinner.
Two specimens have been taken in Greenland.
Wilson, in his account of its breeding habits, speaks of it as a
resident bird from Cayenne to Hudson’s Bay, as being common in the
States of Kentucky and Ohio, and as having been found in the
neighborhood of St. Louis. He describes the habits of this species as
similar to those of the Hairy and Downy Woodpeckers, with which it
generally associates. The only nest of this bird which Wilson ever met
with was in the body of an old pear-tree, about ten or eleven feet
from the ground. The hole was almost exactly circular, small for the
size of the bird, so that it crept in and out with difficulty; but the
excavation suddenly widened, descending by a small angle, and then
running downward about fifteen inches. On the smooth solid wood lay
four white eggs. This was about the 25th of May.
Mr. Audubon, on the other hand, speaks of this species as returning to
Louisiana and the other Southern States only about the beginning of
October, remaining there during the winter, and again taking its
departure before the beginning of April, after which period he never
observed it in those districts. A few only, according to the same
authority, breed in Kentucky, but the greater number migrate to the
more northern parts of the Union. He describes it, in its habits, as
preferring the interior of the forest during the spring and summer,
seldom showing itself near the habitation of man at those seasons. It
generally, he adds, bores its nest at a considerable height, and
usually in the trunk of an undecayed tree, immediately beneath a large
branch, and on its southern side. The hole is worked out by the male
as well as the female, in the manner followed by the other species,
and to the depth of from fifteen to twenty-four inches. The aperture
is just large enough to admit the birds, but the whole widens
gradually towards the bottom, where it is large and roomy. The eggs,
which are from four to six, and pure white, with a slight blush, are
deposited on the chips without any nest. The young seldom leave the
hole until they are fully fledged.
Mr. Audubon elsewhere speaks of having found this species extremely
abundant in the upper parts of the State of Maine and in the Provinces
of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick; but he saw none in Newfoundland or
Labrador.
For my specimens of the eggs of this species and valuable information
as to its habits, I am indebted to Mr. Charles S. Paine, of East
Bethel, Vt., in which State it seems to be quite abundant. In a letter
written in the summer of 1860, he furnishes the results of his
observations relative to their habits, so far as they have fallen
under his notice.
The Yellow-bellied Woodpeckers reach the central and northern parts of
that State about the 10th of April. They soon make their presence
known there by their loud and continued drumming, rather than tapping,
on the trunks and larger branches of decaying trees. Of this drumming
they seem to be peculiarly fond, especially where they can produce a
loud ringing sound. Sometimes, when Mr. Paine had been engaged in the
process of preparing maple sugar, he had left a few empty wooden
buckets hanging on the branches of trees, until needed for use. Upon
these the bird will drum, apparently with the greatest delight. At
times they would experiment upon the tin pails, but, being unable to
obtain good standing-ground, they did not follow it up. On such
occasions their drumming did not appear to be done in the pursuit of
worms or food, but was very evidently for their own entertainment, or
in a spirit of rivalry one with another, as if seeking to please their
mates. When two male birds meet, they pursue each other through the
woods with great clamor. They have a loud, distinct, and lively note,
but their favorite music appears to be this drumming. They mate and
commence the excavation of their nests the last week in April. Their
eggs are usually deposited, in this section, somewhere between the
20th of May and the first of June. The excavations for their nests are
usually made in the tops of large decaying trees. He adds that he
found four or five of these nests that year. The eggs of one of these
he was able to obtain without much trouble, the others had hatched.
When the young leave their nests they usually keep together, and often
four or five may be seen playing about the bark of the same tree while
waiting for their parents to bring them their food.
This species is far more abundant at the West than it is in the New
England States. In the States of Rhode Island, Connecticut, and
Massachusetts it is very rarely met with. It is commonly known as the
Sap-Sucker, and much better deserves that name than do other species
to which this term is also applied. Owing to the peculiar formation of
its tongue and the muscles connected with it, it feeds less readily
upon insects, and they form a smaller proportion of its food. In the
spring of the year these birds prey largely upon the inner bark of
trees, and where they exist in great numbers often do a great deal of
mischief. In April, 1868, I visited gardens in Racine, in company with
Dr. Hoy, where these Woodpeckers had every successive spring committed
their ravages, and was eyewitness to their performance. Their
punctures were unlike those of the _pubescens_, being much deeper,
penetrating the inner bark, and, being repeated in close proximity,
becomes entirely stripped off after a while, often resulting in the
girdling and complete destruction of the tree. In one garden of some
considerable size, all the mountain-ash and white-pine trees had thus
been killed. In prairie countries, where trees are a deficiency and
their cultivation both important and attended with difficulty, these
birds prove a great pest, and in a few hours may destroy the labor of
many years. These habits, so well known to most of our Western
farmers, appear to have entirely escaped the notice of our older
ornithologists.
Mr. Dresser found these birds near San Antonio at all seasons of the
year, but rather rare. He shot a couple near the Medina River, and Dr.
Heermann also procured the eggs in that neighborhood.
Mr. Ridgway says that in Southern Illinois this Woodpecker is only a
winter resident, coming from the north in September or October, and
departing in April. It is the only one of the eight species of
Woodpeckers of that section which does not breed there, and also the
only one which is not resident.
Specimens of its eggs from Vermont measure .95 by .70 of an inch. They
are of an oval shape, a little less rounded at one end than at the
other.
Sphyropicus varius, var. nuchalis, BAIRD.
THE RED-NAPED WOODPECKER.
_Sphyropicus varius_, var. _nuchalis_, BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858,
103, pl. xxxv, figs. 1, 2. _Sphyropicus nuchalis_, BAIRD, Ib.
921.—COUES, Pr. A. N. Sc. 1866, 53.—COOPER, Pr. Cal. Ac.
1861, 122.—CASS. P. A. N. S. 1863, 204.—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1,
1870, 390. _Picus varius occidentalis_, SUNDEVALL, Consp. Pic.
1866, 34. _Cladoscopus nuchalis_, CAB. & HEIN. 82.
SP. CHAR. Markings, generally, as in _S. varius_. A red nuchal
crescent. Belly yellowish-white. The red of the throat extending over
and obliterating the black stripe from the lower mandible, except on
the side of the jaw. Post-ocular black patch tinged with red.
Secondaries with little or no white on outer webs. Tail-feathers
black, scarcely varied; the innermost with inner web, as in _varius_.
Female similar, but with the chin white; the throat red, bordered, as
in male, by a black stripe from the bill to the black pectoral patch.
Length, 8.00; wing, 5.00; tail, 3.50.
HAB. Middle Province of United States. Localities: Fort Mohave
(COOPER, Pr. Cal. Ac. 1861, 122); W. Arizona (COUES, P. A. N. S. 1866,
53).
This bird, first indicated as a simple variety of _S. varius_, is yet
as decidedly distinct and constant in its markings as a large number
of what are considered to be valid species. The principal differences
from _varius_ have been mentioned above: they consist mainly in the
greater development of red, as seen in wider throat-patch; nuchal
crescent; tinge on cheek; a greater amount of black, shown in
unspotted outer webs of secondaries and blacker tail, and in the paler
colors below. The most striking peculiarity is in the half-red throat
of the female, which is entirely white in _varius_. The light markings
of the back are more distinctly arranged in two lines enclosing a
median of black, which show no concealed white spots as in _varius_.
The breast is much paler, only slightly tinged with yellow, instead of
the rich color to which _S. varius_ owes its trivial name.
Young birds vary in color to the same excessive degree as in _varius_.
HABITS. This form, closely allied to the _varius_, was at first known
only from the southern Rocky Mountains. Afterwards a large number of
specimens were obtained by Mr. C. Drexler at Fort Bridger, in Utah.
Dr. Cooper procured a female specimen of this species at Fort Mohave,
on the 20th of February, 1861, which had probably wandered in a storm
from the mountains, and which was the only one he met with. Dr.
Heermann states, also, that they were not rare at Fort Yuma. Dr.
Cooper’s bird was silent and inactive, as if exhausted by a long
flight. He also saw these birds rather common as he crossed the
mountains near latitude 48° in September, 1860, and noticed a great
similarity in their habits to those of the _S. varius_. They chiefly
frequented small deciduous trees, fed in the usual manner of other
Woodpeckers, and had also a shrill, unvaried call or note of alarm.
Dr. Coues found this Woodpecker an abundant and a permanent resident
in Arizona. Its distinctness as a species he did not question.
Everywhere common, it seemed to prefer live cottonwood-trees and
willows. Two specimens of this race have been taken in New
England,—one in New Hampshire by Mr. William Brewster, the other in
Cambridge by Mr. Henshaw.
The Red-naped Woodpecker was found by Mr. Ridgway to be one of the
most abundant and characteristic species of the Wahsatch and Uintah
Mountains. It was also found, in greater or less numbers, throughout
the Great Basin, in the region of his route, and was even obtained on
the eastern Sierra Nevada, where, however, only one specimen was seen.
Its favorite resort, during summer, was the aspen groves in the
mountains, at an altitude averaging about seven thousand feet; and
even when pine woods were near the aspens were invariably chosen as
nesting-places. Its excavations were always in living trees, and the
abandoned ones were taken possession of by Purple Martins and
White-bellied Swallows (_Progne subis_ and _Tachycineta bicolor_) as
nesting-places. In winter it was found among the cottonwoods and
willows of the river valleys. Its habits, manners, and notes are
described as almost perfectly similar to those of _S. varius_.
Sphyropicus varius, var. ruber, BAIRD.
THE RED-BREASTED WOODPECKER.
_Picus ruber_, GM. Syst. Nat. I, 1788, 429.—WAGLER, Syst. Av. 1827,
No. 151.—AUD. Orn. Biog. V, 1839, 179, pl. ccccxvi.—IB. Birds
Amer. IV, 1842, 261, pl. cclxvi.—SUNDEVALL, Consp. Pic. 32.
_Melanerpes ruber_, RICH. List, Pr. Br. Assoc. for
1835.—BONAP. List, 1838.—IB. Consp. 1850, 115. _Pilumnus
ruber_, BON. Consp. Zyg. Aten. Ital. 1854, 8. _Picus
flaviventris_, VIEILLOT, Ois. Am. Sept. II, 1807, 67.
_Sphyropicus ruber_, BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858, 104.—COOPER &
SUCKLEY, 160.—GRAY, Cat. 51.—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1, 1870, 392.
_Cladoscopus ruber_, CAB. & HEIN. Mus. Hein. IV, 1863, 82.
SP. CHAR. Fourth quill longest; third intermediate between fourth and
fifth. Bill brown wax-color. Head and neck all round, and breast,
carmine-red. Above black, central line of back from nape to rump
spotted with whitish; rump, wing-coverts, and inner web of the inner
tail-feathers white, the latter with a series of round black spots.
Belly sulphur-yellow, streaked with brown on the sides. Narrow space
around and a little in front of the eye black. A yellowish stripe from
the nostrils, a short distance below and behind the eye. Length, about
8.50; wing, 5.00; tail, 3.40. Sexes similar.
HAB. Pacific slopes of the United States.
As stated in the remarks before the synopsis on page 1133, there is
every reason for considering this as merely a geographical race of a
species, of which _nuchalis_ and _varius_ are the other forms. The
differences from _varius_ consist merely in an excessive amount of
red, this obliterating the normal pattern of the cephalic portions;
and in an increased amount of black, or a manifestation of the
melanistic tendency so often distinguishing birds of the Pacific coast
region from their eastern co-specific representatives.
_S. nuchalis_ is exactly intermediate in all respects between _S.
ruber_ and _S. varius_,—the extremes,—while each of the latter is
connected with the intermediate race by specimens combining the
characters of both races.
HABITS. The geographical distribution of this form seems to be
restricted to the Pacific coast region.
Dr. Cooper only met with these birds three times in Washington
Territory. This was in spring and fall. He speaks of them as being
very shy, silent, and retiring, remaining among the dense tops of the
dark forest trees. Whether it resides and breeds in the Territory he
had no means of determining. Dr. Suckley saw but one specimen, and
regarded it as confined, for the most part, to the close vicinity of
the coast.
Mr. Audubon assigns to it the same distribution, but is only able to
give the information in regard to its habits which he derived from the
observations of Mr. Nuttall, which, however, do not correspond with
those of Dr. Cooper. Mr. Nuttall states that this species, seen in the
forests of the Columbia and the Blue Mountains, has most of the habits
of the common Red-headed species. He concedes that it is less
familiar, and that it keeps generally among the tall fir-trees, in the
dead trunks of which it burrows out a hole for a nest, sometimes at a
great elevation. On approaching one that was feeding its young in one
of these situations, it uttered a loud reverberating _t’rr_, and
seemed angry and solicitous at his approach. He adds that this species
also inhabits California, as well as the northwest coast up to Nootka,
and that it is found eastward as far as the central chain of the Rocky
Mountains. An egg taken from a nest which contained four was 1.25 in
length and .75 of an inch in breadth. It was smooth, equally rounded
at both ends, though somewhat elongated, and pure white.
We are confident that there must be some mistake in this statement.
The disproportion between the length and the breadth is unprecedented.
Even in the most oblong egg there is rarely so much as twenty-five per
cent difference.
Dr. Cooper, in his Birds of California, speaks of it as rather a
northern bird, having seen none south of Santa Clara, and there only
in the mountains of the Coast Range in early spring.
Dr. Heermann found this form not at all rare in the Sierra Nevada
Mountains, and occasionally met a stray one among the valleys. Their
call-note was similar to the cry of a child in distress, and was very
disagreeable. In their quick, restless motions, and their untiring
diligence in quest of food, they resemble the rest of the Woodpecker
family.
It was noticed by Mr. Ridgway only on the Sierra Nevada, and he is not
certain that he saw it on the eastern slope of that range.
Sphyropicus williamsoni, BAIRD.
WILLIAMSON’S WOODPECKER.
_Picus williamsoni_, NEWBERRY, Zoöl. California and Oregon Route,
89, P. R. R. Repts. VI, 1857, pl. xxxiv, fig. 1.—SUNDEVALL,
Consp. 32. _Melanerpes rubrigularis_, SCL. Annals and Mag. N.
H. 3d series, I, Feb. 1858, 127.—Pr. Zoöl. Soc. 1858, 2, pl.
cxxxi. _Sphyropicus williamsoni_, BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858,
105, pl. xxxiv, f. 1.—COUES, Pr. 1866, 54.—CASS. P. A. N. S.
1863, 204.—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1, 1870, 393. _Cladoscopus
williamsoni_, CAB. & HEIN. Mus. Hein. IV, 1863, 82. _Melanerpes
williamsoni_, GRAY, Catal. Br. Mus. 1868, 116.
SP. CHAR. Rich black; middle line of belly yellow; central line of
chin and throat above red. A large patch on the wing, rump, and upper
tail-coverts, a line from the forehead beneath the eye, and another
from its upper border, white. Tail entirely black. Exposed surface of
quills without any white, except on the outer primaries. Female with
the chin white instead of red. Length, 9.00; wing, 5.00; tail, 4.70.
HAB. Rocky Mountains to the Cascade Mountains, Sierra Nevada.
Localities: West Arizona (COUES, P. A. N. S. 1866, 54).
Head and neck all round, sides of breast and body, upper parts
generally, wings, and tail, glossy greenish-black. A well-defined
white stripe from the nostrils (including the bristly nasal feathers)
passing backwards under the eye; another, nearly parallel, starting at
the upper part of the eye, and nearly meeting its fellow on the
occiput. Chin and throat red along their central line. A large patch
on the wing, including the exposed portions of the middle and greater
coverts, white, although the anterior lesser coverts are black. The
inner face of the wings, excepting the smaller coverts, is black,
banded transversely on the inner primaries with white; the sides of
body behind and under tail-coverts white, with broadly V-shaped bands
of black, which color on the latter occupies the whole central portion
of the feathers. Rump and upper tail-coverts pure white; back with a
few indistinct and concealed spots of the same. Quills black; the
margins of exterior primaries spotted with white, the inner margins
only of the remaining quills with similar but larger and more
transverse blotches. Middle of the body, from the breast to the vent,
sulphur-yellow, with the exception of the type which had been
preserved in alcohol (which sometimes extracts the red of feathers).
We have seen no specimen (except young birds, marked female), in a
considerable number, without red on the chin, and are inclined to
think that both sexes exhibit this character. Young birds from the
Rocky Mountains are very similar to the adult, but have the throat
marked white, and the inner web of innermost tail-feather banded with
the same color. No. 16,090, ♂ ad. (Fort Crook, California), has a
single crimson feather in the middle of the forehead.
HABITS. This comparatively new species of Woodpecker was first
discovered by Dr. Newberry in the pine forest on the eastern border of
the upper Klamath Lake. Its habits appeared to him to be very similar
to those of _P. harrisi_ and _P. gairdneri_, which inhabit the same
region. The individual he procured was creeping up the trunk of a
large yellow pine (_P. brachyptera_), searching for insects in the
bark. Its cry was very like that of _P. harrisi_. Although killed by
the first fire, a second discharge was required to detach it from the
limb to which it clung fast.
According to Dr. Coues, it is resident and not uncommon in the
Territory of Arizona, occurring exclusively among the pine-trees. It
is said to range from both slopes of the Rocky Mountains to the
Pacific, from as far north at least as Oregon. Fort Whipple is
supposed to be about its southern limit. Dr. Coues states that this
species possesses the anatomical peculiarities of the _S. varius_, and
that its habits entirely correspond. Mr. Allen found it abundant on
the sides of Mount Lincoln, in Colorado Territory.
Dr. Cooper met with a straggler of this species in the valley of the
Colorado, shot on the 12th of March, 1861. In September, 1863, he
found them rather common near the summit of the Sierra Nevada,
latitude 39°, where he shot two. It has since been met with at Laramie
Peak, and near the mouth of the Klamath River.
It was found by Mr. Ridgway on the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevada,
and again on the Wahsatch Mountains; in both regions inhabiting the
pine forests exclusively, and in neither place at all common. It
occurred so seldom that Mr. Ridgway could learn but little concerning
the peculiarities of its habits, etc. Its common note is a plaintive
wailing squeal, much like that of _S. varius_ (common to all the
members of the genus), but other notes were heard which were quite
peculiar.
Sphyropicus thyroideus, BAIRD.
BROWN-HEADED WOODPECKER.
_Picus thyroideus_, CASSIN, Pr. A. N. Sc. V, Dec. 1851, 349
(California).—HEERMANN, J. A. N. Sc. Ph. 2d ser. II, 1853,
270.—SUNDEVALL, Consp. 32. _Melanerpes thyroideus_, CASSIN,
Ill. I, 1854, 201, pl. xxxii. _Pilumnus thyroideus_, BON.
Consp. Zygod. Aten. Ital. 1854, 8. _Sphyropicus thyroideus_,
BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858, 106—ELLIOT, Ill. Birds N. Am. II,
pl.—COUES, P. A. N. S. 1866, 54.—CASS. P. A. N. S. 1863,
204.—GRAY, Cat. 52.—ELLIOT, B. Am. I, pl. xxxv.—COOPER, Orn.
Cal. I, 1870, 394. _? ? Picus nataliæ_, MALHERBE, Cab. Journ.
f. Ornith. 1854, 171.
SP. CHAR. About the size of _P. varius_. Head dark ashy-brown; general
color ashy-brown; head and neck scarcely marked; middle line of belly
sulphur-yellow; rump and upper coverts pure white; rest of body
apparently encircled by narrow transverse and continuous bands
(crossing the wings and tail) of black, the outer spaces becoming
whiter behind; a large round black patch on the breast. No red on top
of the head. Male with reddish chin. Length, about 9.00; wing, 5.00;
tail, 4.10.
HAB. Cascade and Coast Ranges of California and Oregon; Sierra Nevada,
Wahsatch, and Rocky Mountains. Localities: West Arizona (COUES, P. A.
N. S. 1866, 54).
In addition to the characters already assigned, the crown of the head
is indistinctly streaked or spotted with black. The under coverts are
barred with black. The tail-feathers are black, the inner and outer
barred transversely with white on both webs; the shafts, however,
entirely black. The quills are all spotted with white on both webs.
The jugular black patch shows more or less indication of the
transverse bands, and is sometimes wanting, leaving the bands
distinct. In one specimen (38,285 ♀, Laramie Peak) it is remarkably
large and almost unbroken, while the black malar stripe is decidedly
indicated; on the back the black bars much exceed in width the light
ones, which are nearly white. The generic rictal white stripe is
usually inappreciable, as also the black maxillary one, although both
can be detected in some specimens.
A young bird is not appreciably different from the adult.
HABITS. Dr. Cooper regards this bird as quite a rare species. He has
never met with it, and doubts if it is ever found so far south as San
Francisco. Mr. J. G. Bell, of New York, was the first to meet with
this bird in the Lower Sierra Nevada.
Dr. Heermann procured specimens among the southern mines, near the
Colorado River, where they were especially frequenting the pine-trees
in search of their food. He saw none of them alight on an oak, though
those trees were abundant in that locality. It has since been met with
near Fort Crook, and Dr. Cooper thinks it probable they may be more
common in the mountains of Eastern Oregon and in those of Central
Utah.
Dr. Coues says that it is resident, but very rare, in Arizona. It
frequents pine-trees by preference. Its range is said to include both
slopes of the Rocky Mountains, from Oregon to the Rio Grande, and
probably to Sonora.
Mr. Ridgway met with this rare Woodpecker on the Sierra Nevada and
Wahsatch Mountains, where it inhabited the same woods with the _S.
williamsoni_; it appeared to have the same manners and notes as that
species, but it was so seldom met with that nothing satisfactory could
be learned concerning its habits. Its conspicuously barred coloration
gives it much the appearance of a _Centurus_, when flying.
GENUS HYLOTOMUS, BAIRD.
_Dryotomus_, MALHERBE, Mém. Ac. Metz, 1849, 322. (Not of SWAINSON,
1831.)
_Dryopicus_, BONAP. Consp. Zygod. in Aten. Ital. May, 1854. (Not of
MALHERBE.)
_Hylatomus_, BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858, 107. (Type, _Picus
pileatus_.)
_Phlæotomus_, CAB. & HEIN. 1863. (Same type.)
GEN. CHAR. Bill a little longer than the head; considerably depressed,
or broader than high at the base; shaped much as in _Campephilus_,
except shorter, and without the bristly feathers directed forwards at
the base of the lower jaw. Gonys about half the length of the
commissure. Tarsus shorter than any toe, except the inner posterior.
Outer posterior toe shorter than the outer anterior, and a little
longer than the inner anterior. Inner posterior very short, not half
the outer anterior; about half the inner anterior one. Tail long,
graduated; the longer feathers much incurved at the tip. Wing longer
than the tail, reaching to the middle of the exposed surface of tail;
considerably graduated, though pointed; the fourth and fifth quills
longest. Color uniform black. Head with pointed occipital crest. A
stripe from nasal tufts beneath the eye and down side of neck, throat,
lining of wing, and basal portion of under surface of quills, white;
some species with the abdomen and sides barred black and
brownish-white; others with a white scapular stripe in addition. Male
with whole crown and crest and maxillary patch red; female with only
the crest red.
This genus is similar in general appearance and size to _Campephilus_,
but differs essentially in many respects; the differences being,
however, mostly those which distinguish all other Woodpeckers from the
species of _Campephilus_, which is unique in the peculiar structure of
the tail-feathers, the great graduation of the tertials (sixth,
instead of third or fourth, longest), and very long gonys with the
flat tuft of hair like feathers at its base. The less development of
the outer hind toe in _Hylotomus_, which is about exactly intermediate
between the outer and inner anterior, the outer largest, instead of
being longest, and having the outer anterior intermediate between it
and the inner, the shorter bill, the gonys fully half the length of
the commissure, are additional distinctive features.
[Line drawing: _Hylotomus pileatus._
1723 ♀]
Of _Hylotomus_ there are several species in tropical America, all
differing, however, in transversely banded lower parts, while some
have a broad white scapular stripe; in these features of coloration
(but in these only, for the head pattern is always much as in the _H.
pileatus_) they resemble closely species of _Campephilus_ (_C.
guatemalensis_, _C. albirostris_, _C. malherbei_, etc.,) found in the
same region; one (_H. scapularis_, of Mexico) even has a whitish
ivory-like bill. They may all be distinguished from the species of
_Campephilus_, however, by the generic differences.
Hylotomus pileatus, BAIRD.
BLACK WOODCOCK; LOG-COCK.
_Picus pileatus_, LINN. Syst. Nat. I. 1766, 173.—VIEILLOT, Ois. Am.
Sept. II, 1807, 58, pl. cx.—WILSON, Am. Orn. IV, 1811, 27, pl.
xxix, f. 2.—WAGLER, Syst. Av. 1827, No. 2.—AUD. Orn. Biog.
II, 1834, 74; V, 533, pl. cxi.—IB. Birds Amer. IV, 1842, 266,
pl. cclvii.—MAXIM. Cab. Jour. VI. 1858, 352.—SUNDEVALL,
Consp. 8. _Picus (Dryotomus) pileatus_, SW. F. Bor. Am. II,
1831, 304. _Dryotomus pileatus_, BP. List, 1838. _Dryocopus
pileatus_, BONAP. Consp. Av. 1850, 132. _Dryopicus pileatus_,
BON. Consp. Zyg. Aten. Ital. I.—SCLATER, Catal. 1862,
332.—GRAY, Catal. 59. _Pileated Woodpecker_, PENNANT.—LATHAM.
_Hylotomus pileatus_, BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858, 107.—LORD, Pr.
R. Art. Inst. IV, 212.—COOPER & SUCKLEY, 161.—DRESSER, Ibis,
1865, 469 (E. Texas, but not Rio Grande).—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1,
1870, 396. _Ceophloeus pileatus_, CAB. Jour. 1862, 176.
(_Hylotoma_, preoccupied by Latreille!!) CAB. & HEIN. Mus.
Hein. IV, II, 1863.—SAMUELS, 99.—ALLEN, B. E. Fla. 302.
[Illustration: _Hylotomus pileatus._]
SP. CHAR. Fourth and fifth quills equal and longest; third
intermediate between sixth and seventh. Bill blue-black; more
horn-color beneath. General color of body, wings, and tail dull
greenish-black. A narrow white streak from just above the eye to the
occiput; a wider one from the nostril feathers (inclusive), under the
eye and along the side of the head and neck; sides of the breast
(concealed by the wing), axillaries, and under wing-coverts, and
concealed bases of all the quills, with chin and beneath the head,
white, tinged with sulphur-yellow. Entire crown from the base of the
bill to a well-developed occipital crest, as also a patch on the ramus
of the lower jaw, scarlet-red. A few faint white crescents on the
sides of the body and on the abdomen. Longer primaries generally
tipped with white. Length, about 18.00; wing, 9.50. _Female_ without
the red on the cheek, and the anterior half of that on the top of the
head replaced by black.
HAB. Wooded parts of North America from Atlantic to Pacific.
Localities: E. Texas (not Rio Grande!), (DRESSER, Ibis, 1865, 469,
breeds).
Specimens of this species from Fort Liard in the Northern Rocky
Mountains, and from Puget Sound region, are nearly four inches longer
than those from the Southern Atlantic States, and are scarcely
exceeded in size by the Ivory-billed Woodpecker.
Specimens from the northwest coast region (Columbia River, British
Columbia, etc.) have no trace of the white spots on ends of outer
primaries, always found in eastern specimens.
HABITS. No member of this large family has a wider distribution than
the Pileated Woodpecker, extending from the Gulf of Mexico to the
extremest limits of the northern forests, and from the Atlantic to the
Pacific. It seems to be a resident everywhere but in its extreme
northern localities, rather than a migratory species. There are
specimens in the Smithsonian collection from Nelson River, on the
north, to St. Johns River, Florida, on the south, and from
Pennsylvania on the east to the Rio Grande and the Columbia on the
west. Sir John Richardson (_Fauna Boreali-Americana_, II, p. 304)
speaks of it as resident all the year in the interior of the fur
countries, up to the 62d or 63d parallels, rarely appearing near
Hudson’s Bay, but frequenting the gloomiest recesses of the forests
that skirt the Rocky Mountains. Dr. Woodhouse, in his Report on the
natural history of the expedition down the Zuñi and the Colorado
Rivers, speaks of this Woodpecker as having been found abundant in the
Indian Territory, Texas, and New Mexico. Neither Dr. Gambel nor Dr.
Heermann give it in their lists of the birds of California, nor does
Dr. Newberry mention meeting with it in his Report of the zoölogy of
his route. Dr. Suckley, however, speaks of the Log-Cock as abundant in
the vicinity of Fort Steilacoom, Washington Territory, during summer,
and Dr. Cooper also mentions it as an abundant and constant resident
in the forests of the Territory. I have occasionally met with it in
the wilder portions of New Hampshire and Maine, but have nowhere been
so fortunate as to observe its nest or its breeding-habits. It has
always seemed a very shy bird, difficult of approach, always keeping
at a safe distance, and ever greeting your attempts for a nearer view
with a loud, cackling cry, not unlike a derisive laugh.
According to the observations of Wilson, their eggs are deposited in
the hole of a tree dug out by themselves, no other materials being
used but the soft chips of rotten wood. The female lays six eggs, of a
snowy whiteness, and they are said to raise two broods in a season.
Mr. Audubon states that it almost always breeds in the interior of the
forest, and frequently on trees placed in deep swamps over the water,
appearing to give a preference to the southern side of the tree, on
which side the hole is usually found to which they retreat in the
winter and during stormy weather. The hole is sometimes bored
perpendicularly, but occasionally in the form of that of the
Ivory-billed Woodpecker. The usual depth is from twelve to eighteen
inches, the breadth from two and a half to three, and at the bottom
five or six. He believed they raise but a single brood in a season.
The young follow their parents a long while, sometimes until the
return of spring.
Rev. Dr. Bachman gives an interesting account of a pair of Pileated
Woodpeckers building a nest in an old elm-tree in a swamp, and
occupying it the first year. Early the next spring two Bluebirds took
possession of it, and there had young. Before they were half grown the
Woodpeckers returned to the place, and, despite the cries and
reiterated attacks of the Bluebirds, took out the young and carried
them away to some distance. Next, the nest itself was disposed of, the
hole cleaned and enlarged, and there they raised their brood. The tree
was large, but so situated that Dr. Bachman could reach the nest from
the branches of another. The hole was eighteen inches deep, and he
could touch the bottom with his hand. The eggs, six in number, were
laid on fragments of chips expressly left by the birds, and were
large, white, and translucent. Before the Woodpeckers began to sit, he
robbed them of their eggs to see if they would lay a second time. They
waited a few days as if undecided, and then he heard the female at
work again, deepening the hole and making it broader at the bottom.
She soon recommenced laying, this time depositing five eggs. He
suffered her to bring out her young, both birds alternately
incubating, and each visiting the other at intervals, looking in at
the hole to see if all were right and well there, and flying off
afterwards in search of food. When the young were old enough, he took
them home and endeavored to raise them. Three died, refusing all food.
With two he was more successful. But even these he found untamable and
destructive and troublesome pets, which he was at last glad to
release.
Dr. Cooper, who observed this species in Washington Territory,
discovered a pair early in April on Whitby’s Island, burrowing out a
hole for their nest in a dead trunk, about thirty feet from the
ground. They worked alternately, and were very watchful, keeping
perfectly silent while they heard any noise near by. He found the
place by noticing chips on the bushes below, and after watching
silently for some time, one of them began to work, now and then
protruding its bill full of chips, and, after cautiously looking
round, dropping them.
According to Mr. C. S. Paine, of Randolph, Vt., the Pileated
Woodpecker is very rare in Vermont, and extremely shy. It is difficult
to approach one nearer than from fifteen to twenty rods, except by
surprise. He adds that in only a single instance has he been able to
shoot one. This fell with a broken wing. Before he could reach it, the
bird commenced climbing a tree, and nearly escaped. When overtaken, it
fought furiously, and wounded Mr. Paine severely in the hand, setting
up at the same time a loud outcry, not unlike that of a domestic hen.
He has never met with its nest, although he has several times seen the
young when just able to leave it. The elder Mr. Paine states that,
some fifty years previous, this species was abundant in Vermont, and
not at all timid, and is of the opinion that their present shyness is
all that exempts them from extermination.
Mr. Dresser found this Woodpecker resident and quite numerous in Texas
near all the large rivers, where the timber is heavy. A few were seen
on the Medina, and their eggs obtained there, but they were not
abundant in that district. On the Colorado and Brazos Rivers these
birds were very common, and Mr. Dresser found several nests in huge
cottonwood-trees, but had no means of getting to them.
Mr. J. K. Lord assigns to this species a wide western range, being
common both east and west of the Cascades, and on the west slope of
the Rocky Mountains. He met with it north as far as Fort Rupert in
Vancouver Island, and south through Oregon and California. He found
them at Colville during the winter. He states that they nest in May,
generally in a tall dead pine-tree, at a great height.
For my first specimens of the eggs of this species I am under
obligations to Dr. Cornelius Kollock, of Cheraw, S. C. They were
obtained by him from excavations made in large trees at the height of
about twenty-five feet from the ground, and in localities at no great
distance from the inhabited parts of the country.
The eggs of this species from South Carolina and Florida are of a very
brilliant crystalline whiteness, of a rounded-oval shape, and measure
1.25 inches in length by 1.02 in breadth. Northern specimens are
probably larger.
SECTION CENTUREÆ.
The United States genera of this section are very similar to each
other, and may be most easily distinguished by color, as follows:—
Centurus. Back and wings banded transversely with black and white.
Crown more or less red; rest of head with under parts grayish, and
with red or yellow tinge on the middle of the abdomen. Rump white.
Melanerpes. Upper parts uniform black, without bands, with or without
a white rump; variable beneath, but without transverse bands.
GENUS CENTURUS, SWAINSON.
_Centurus_, SW. Class. Birds, II, 1837, 310. (Type, _C. carolinus_.)
_Zebrapicus_, MALH. Mém. Acad. Metz, 1849, 360. (Type, _C.
carolinus_.)
GEN. CHAR. Bill about the length of the head, or a little longer;
decidedly compressed, except at the extreme base. A lateral ridge
starting a little below the culmen at the base of the bill, and
angular for half the length of the bill, then becoming obsolete,
though traceable nearly to the tip. Culmen considerably curved from
the base; gonys nearly straight. Nostrils very broad, elliptical;
situated about midway on the side of the mandible, near the base;
partly concealed. Outer pairs of toes unequal, the anterior toe
longest. Wings long, broad; third to fifth primaries equal and
longest. Tail-feathers rather narrow, stiffened.
The species are all banded above transversely with black and white;
the rump white. The head and under parts are brown, or grayish, the
latter sometimes much the lighter. The belly with a red or yellow
tinge. The under tail-coverts with V-shaped dark marks. The North
American species of _Centurus_ may be arranged as follows:—
C. carolinus. Middle of belly reddish; whole crown and
nape red in male. Nape, only, red in female.
Forehead reddish; beneath soiled ashy-white; abdomen
pinkish-red; crissum with sagittate marks of dusky.
Wing, 5.25; tail, 3.80; bill, 1.30. _Hab._ Eastern
Province United States var. _carolinus_.
Forehead smoky-white; beneath smoky-olive, middle of
abdomen carmine-red; crissum with broad transverse bars
of dusky. Wing, 4.50; tail, 2.60; bill, 1.08. _Hab._
Central America; Venezuela var. _tricolor_.[129]
C. aurifrons. Middle of belly yellowish; red of crown, in
male, confined to an ovoid vertical patch. Nape and
forehead gamboge-yellow; white of rump and upper
tail-coverts immaculate. _Female_ without any red on the
crown.
Inner webs of middle tail-feathers unvariegated black.
Lower parts dirty ashy-whitish, abdomen dilute
gamboge-yellow. Wing, 5.20; tail, 3.60; bill, 1.50.
_Hab._ Eastern Mexico, north to the Rio Grande var. _aurifrons_.
Inner webs of middle tail-feathers spotted with white.
Lower parts smoky-olive, belly bright orange-yellow.
Wing, 4.70; tail, 2.80; bill, 1.16. _Hab._ Costa Rica
var. _hoffmanni_.[130]
C. uropygialis. Middle of the belly yellowish. Nape and
forehead soft smoky grayish-brown. _Female_ without red or
yellow on head. White of rump and upper tail-coverts with
transverse dusky bars. Inner webs of middle tail-feathers
spotted with white. Wing, 5.30; tail, 3.70; bill, 1.35.
_Hab._ Western Mexico, north into Colorado, region of
Middle Province of United States.
[129] _Centurus carolinus_, var. _tricolor_. _Picus
tricolor_, WAGL. Isis, 1829, 512. _Centurus tri._ SCL.
Catal. Am. B. 1862, 343. _C. subelegans_, SCL. P. Z. S.
1855, 162; 1856, 143.
[130] _Centurus aurifrons_, var. _hoffmanni_. _Centurus
hoffmanni_, CABANIS, Journ. Sept. 1862, 322 (Costa Rica).
[Illustration: PLATE LII.
1. Centurus carolinus. ♂ Pa., 868.
2. ” uropygialis. ♂ Ariz., 6128.
3. ” aurifrons. ♂ Texas, 6121.
4. ” carolinus. ♀ 6118.
5. ” uropygialis. ♀ Ariz.
6. ” aurifrons. ♀ Texas.]
Centurus carolinus, BONAP.
RED-BELLIED WOODPECKER.
_Picus carolinus_, LINN. Syst. Nat. I, 1766, 174.—WILSON, Am. Orn.
I, 1808, 113, pl. vii, f. 2.—AUD. Orn. Biog. V, 1839, 169, pl.
ccccxv.—IB. Birds Amer. IV, 1842, 270, pl. cclxx.—MAX. Cab.
Jour. 1858, 418.—SUNDEVALL, Consp. 53. _Centurus carolinus_,
SW. BP. List, 1838.—IB. Conspectus, Av. 1850, 119.—BAIRD,
Birds N. Am. 109.—CAB. Jour. 1862, 324.—DRESSER, Ibis, 1865,
469 (resident in Texas).—SCL. Cat. 1862, 342.—GRAY, Cat.
99.—ALLEN, B. E. Fla. 306. _Centurus carolinensis_, SW. Birds,
II, 1837, 310 (error). _Picus griseus_, VIEILL. Ois. Am. Sept.
II, 1807, 52, pl. cxvi. _? Picus erythrauchen_, WAGLER, Syst.
Avium, 1827. _Picus zebra_, BODDÆRT, Tabl. pl. enl. (Gray,
genera).
SP. CHAR. Third, fourth, and fifth quills nearly equal, and longest;
second, or outermost, and seventh about equal. Top of the head and
nape crimson-red. Forehead whitish, strongly tinged with light red, a
shade of which is also seen on the cheek, still stronger on the middle
of the belly. Under parts brownish-white, with a faint wash of
yellowish on the belly. Back, rump, and wing-coverts banded black and
white; upper tail-covert white, with occasional blotches.
Tail-feathers black; first transversely banded with white; second less
so; all the rest with whitish tips. Inner feathers banded with white
on the inner web; the outer web with a stripe of white along the
middle. Length, 9.75; wing, about 5.00. Female with the crown ashy;
forehead pale red; nape bright red.
[Line drawing: _Centurus carolinus._
865 ♂]
HAB. North America, from Atlantic coast to the eastern slope of the
Rocky Mountains. Localities: Texas (DRESSER, Ibis, 1865, 469,
resident).
Specimens vary considerably in size (with latitude), and in the tinge
of reddish on chin, breast, etc. The width of the dorsal bands differs
in different specimens. The rump is banded; upper tail-coverts are
generally immaculate, but are sometimes dashed with black. Specimens
from the Mississippi Valley are generally more brightly colored than
those from the Atlantic States, the lower parts more strongly tinged
with red. Florida examples are smaller than northern ones, the black
bars broader, the lower parts deeper ashy and strongly tinged with
red, but of a more purplish shade than in western ones.
[Illustration: _Centurus carolinus._]
HABITS. The Red-bellied Woodpecker is distributed throughout North
America, from the Atlantic Coast to the eastern slope of the Rocky
Mountains. It is, however, much more abundant in the more southern and
western portions. In the collections of the Smithsonian Institution
none are recorded from farther north than Pennsylvania on the east and
Nebraska Territory on the west, while others were obtained as far
south as Florida. Nor am I aware that it is found, except very rarely,
north of Pennsylvania on the Atlantic coast. I have never met with it
in Eastern Massachusetts, although Mr. Audubon speaks of it as
breeding from Maryland to Nova Scotia. Dr. Woodhouse found it common
in the Indian Territory and in Texas. Wilson speaks of having found it
abundant in Upper Canada, and in the northern parts of the State of
New York. He also refers to its inhabiting the whole Atlantic States
as far as Georgia and the southern extremity of Florida. Its absence
in Eastern Massachusetts was noticed by Mr. Nuttall. It is not given
by Thompson or Paine as one of the birds of Vermont, nor does
Lieutenant Bland mention it as one of the birds of Nova Scotia, and it
is not included by Sir John Richardson in the _Fauna Boreali-Americana_.
Mr. Audubon speaks of it as generally more confined to the interior of
forests than the Hairy Woodpecker, especially during the
breeding-season. He further states that he never met with its nest in
Louisiana or South Carolina, but that it was not rare in Kentucky, and
that, from the State of Maryland to Nova Scotia, it breeds in all
convenient places, usually more in the woods than out of them. He also
states that he has found the nests in orchards in Pennsylvania,
generally not far from the junction of a branch with the trunk. He
describes the hole as bored in the ordinary manner. The eggs are
seldom more than four in number, and measure 1.06 inches in length and
.75 of an inch in breadth. They are of an elliptical form, smooth,
pure white, and translucent. They are not known to raise more than one
brood in a season.
Wilson speaks of this species as more shy and less domestic than the
Red-headed or any of the other spotted Woodpeckers, and also as more
solitary. He adds that it prefers the largest high-timbered woods and
the tallest decayed trees of the forest, seldom appearing near the
ground, on the fences, or in orchards or open fields. In regard to
their nesting, he says that the pair, in conjunction, dig out a
circular cavity for the nest in the lower side of some lofty branch
that makes a considerable angle with the horizon. Sometimes they
excavate this in the solid wood, but more generally in a hollow limb,
some fifteen inches above where it becomes solid. This is usually done
early in April. The female lays five eggs, of a pure white, or almost
semi-transparent. The young generally make their appearance towards
the latter part of May. Wilson was of the opinion that they produced
two broods in a season.
Mr. Dresser found this bird resident and abundant in Texas. It is also
equally abundant in Louisiana and in Florida, and Mr. Ridgway
considers it very common in Southern Illinois. Neither Mr. Boardman
nor Mr. Verrill have found it in Maine. Mr. McIlwraith has, however,
taken three specimens at Hamilton, Canada West, May 3, near Chatham.
Mr. Allen gives it as a summer visitant in Western Massachusetts,
having seen one on the 13th of May, 1863. It has also been taken
several times in Connecticut, by Professor Emmons, who met with it,
during the breeding-season, in the extreme western part of the State.
Mr. Lawrence has found it near New York City, and Mr. Turnbull in
Eastern Pennsylvania.
The eggs vary from an oblong to a somewhat rounded oval shape, are of
a bright crystalline whiteness, and their measurements average 1.02
inches in length by .88 of an inch in breadth.
Centurus aurifrons, GRAY.
YELLOW-BELLIED WOODPECKER.
_Picus aurifrons_, WAGLER, Isis, 1829, 512.—SUNDEVALL, Consp. Pic.
53. _Centurus aurifrons_, GRAY, Genera.—CABANIS, Jour. 1862,
323.—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1, 1870, 399. _Centurus flaviventris_,
SWAINSON, Anim. in Menag. 1838 (2½ centenaries), 354.—BAIRD,
Birds N. Am. 1858, 110, pl. xlii.—HEERMANN, P. R. Rep. X, c,
18.—DRESSER, Ibis, 1865, 469 (resident in Texas).—IB. Rep.
Mex. Bound. II, 5, pl. iv. _Centurus elegans_, LAWRENCE, Ann.
N. Y. Lyc. V, May, 1851, 116. _Centurus santacruzi_, LAWRENCE,
Ann. N. Y. Lyc. V, 1851, 123 (not of Bonap.). _Picus ornatus_,
LESS. Rev. Zoöl. 1839, 102.
SP. CHAR. Fourth and fifth quills nearly equal; third a little
shorter; longer than the fourth. Back banded transversely with black
and white; rump and upper tail-coverts pure white. Crown with a
subquadrate spot of crimson, about half an inch wide and long; and
separated from the gamboge-yellow at the base of the bill by dirty
white, from the orbit and occiput by brownish-ash. Nape half-way round
the neck orange-yellow. Under part generally, and sides of head, dirty
white. Middle of belly gamboge-yellow. Tail-feathers all entirely
black, except the outer, which has some obscure bars of white. Length
about 9.50; wing, 5.00. Female without the red of the crown.
HAB. Rio Grande region of the United States, south into Mexico.
Probably Arizona. Localities: Orizaba (SCL. P. Z. S. 1860, 252);
Texas, south of San Antonio (DRESSER, Ibis, 1865, 469, resident).
Young birds are not different from adults, except in showing
indication of dark shaft-lines beneath, becoming broader behind on the
sides. The yellow of the nape extends over the whole side of the head.
HABITS. This beautiful Woodpecker is abundant throughout the valley of
the Rio Grande, from Eagle Pass to its mouth; how far to the west
within our boundaries it occurs, I am not able to state. It is common
throughout Mexico, and was found in the Guatemalan collection of Van
Patten, though not mentioned by Sclater and Salvin. Dr. Woodhouse, in
his Report on the zoölogy of Captain Sitgreaves’s expedition, speaks
of finding it quite abundant in the neighborhood of San Antonio,
Texas. He adds that west of the Rio San Pedro he did not meet with it.
He speaks of it as having a loud, sharp cry, which it utters as it
flies from tree to tree. He observed it mostly on the trunks of the
mesquite (_Algarobia_), diligently searching in the usual manner of
Woodpeckers. In the Report upon the birds of the Mexican Boundary
Survey, it is mentioned by Mr. Clark as abundant on the Lower Rio
Grande, as very shy, and as keeping chiefly about the mesquite.
Lieutenant Couch speaks of it as very common throughout Tamaulipas.
Mr. Dresser found the Yellow-bellied Woodpecker plentiful from the Rio
Grande to San Antonio, and as far north and east as the Guadaloupe,
after which he lost sight of it. Wherever the mesquite-trees were
large, there it was sure to be found, and very sparingly elsewhere.
Near San Antonio it is quite common, but not so much so as the _C.
carolinus_. At Eagle Pass, however, it was the more abundant of the
two. He found it breeding near San Antonio, boring for its nest-hole
into a mesquite-tree. Mr. Dresser was informed by Dr. Heermann, who
has seen many of their nests, that he never found them in any other
tree.
These birds were found breeding by Dr. Berlandier, and his collection.
contained quite a number of their eggs. Nothing was found among his
papers in relation to their habits or their manner of breeding. Their
eggs, procured by him, are of an oblong-oval shape, and measure 1.05
inches in length by .85 of an inch in breadth.
Centurus uropygialis, BAIRD.
GILA WOODPECKER.
_Centurus uropygialis_, BAIRD, Pr. A. N. Sc. Ph. VII, June, 1854,
120 (Bill Williams River, N. M.)—IB. Birds N. Am. 1858, III,
pl. xxxvi.—CAB. Jour. 1862, 330.—SUNDEVALL, Consp.
54.—KENNERLY, P. R. R. X, b, pl. xxxvi.—HEERMANN, X, c, 17.
COUES, Pr. Avi. 1866, 54 (S. Arizona).—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1,
1870, 399. _Centurus hypopolius_, (BP.) PUCHERAN, Rev. et Mag.
1853, 163 (not _Picus (Centurus) hypopolius_, WAGLER).
_Zebrapicus kaupii_, MALHERBE, 1855.—GRAY, Catal. Br. Mex.
_Centurus sulfureiventer_, REICHENBACH, Handbuch, Picinæ, Oct.
1854, 410, figs. 4411, 4412.
SP. CHAR. Third, fourth, and fifth quills longest, and about equal.
Back, rump, and upper tail-coverts transversely barred with black and
white, purest on the two latter. Head and neck all round pale
dirty-brown, or brownish-ash, darkest above. A small subquadrate patch
of red on the middle of the crown, separated from the bill by dirty
white. Middle of the abdomen gamboge-yellow; under tail-coverts and
anal region strongly barred with black. First and second outer
tail-feathers banded black and white, as is also the inner web of the
inner tail-feather; the outer web of the latter with a white stripe.
Length, about 9.00; wing, 5.00. Female with the head uniform
brownish-ash, without any red or yellow.
HAB. Lower Colorado River of the West, to Cape St. Lucas. South to
Mazatlan. Localities: W. Arizona (COUES, P. A. N. S. 1866, 54).
HABITS. This species was first discovered by Dr. Kennerly in his route
along the 35th parallel, and described by Professor Baird, in 1854.
The Doctor encountered it almost continually during the entire march
along the Big Sandy, Bill Williams Fork, and the Great Colorado; but
it was so very shy that he had great difficulty in procuring
specimens. Seated in the top of the tree, it was ever on guard; and,
upon the approach of danger, flew away, accompanying its flight with
the utterance of very peculiar notes. Its flight was in an undulating
line, like that of other birds of this class.
Dr. Heermann found this Woodpecker abundant on the banks of the Gila
River among the mesquite-trees. The giant cactus, often forty feet
high, which grows abundantly on the arid hillsides throughout that
whole section of country, was frequently found filled with holes bored
out by this bird. The pith of the plant is extracted until a chamber
of suitable size is obtained, when the juice exuding from the wounded
surface hardens, and forms a smooth dry coating to the cavity, thus
making a convenient place for the purposes of incubation. At Tucson,
in Arizona, he found it frequenting the cornfields, where it might be
seen alighting on the old hedge-posts in search of insects. Its note,
he adds, resembles very much that of the Red-headed Woodpecker. He
afterwards met with this bird in California, in considerable numbers,
on the Colorado. Besides its ordinary notes, resembling those of the
_Melanerpes erythrocephalus_, it varies them with a soft plaintive
cry, as if hurt or wounded. He found their stomachs filled with the
white gelatinous berry of a parasitic plant which grows abundantly on
the mesquite-trees, and the fruit of which forms the principal food of
many species of birds during the fall.
Dr. Coues gives this bird as rare and probably accidental in the
immediate vicinity of Fort Whipple, but as a common bird in the
valleys of the Gila and of the Lower Colorado, where it has the local
name of _Suwarrow_, or _Saguaro_, on account of its partiality for the
large cactuses, with the juice of which plant its plumage is often
found stained.
Dr. Cooper found this Woodpecker abundant in winter at Fort Mohave,
when they feed chiefly on the berries of the mistletoe, and are very
shy. He rarely saw them pecking at the trees, but they seemed to
depend for a living on insects, which were numerous on the foliage
during the spring. They have a loud note of alarm, strikingly similar
to that of the _Phainopepla nitens_, which associated with them in the
mistletoe-boughs.
About the 25th of March he found them preparing their nests in burrows
near the dead tops of trees, none of them, so far as he saw, being
accessible. By the last of May they had entirely deserted the
mistletoe, and were probably feeding their young on insects.
GENUS MELANERPES, SWAINSON.
_Melanerpes_, SWAINSON, F. B. A. II, 1831. (Type, _Picus
erythrocephalus_.)
_Melampicus_ (Section 3), MALHERBE, Mém. Ac. Metz, 1849, 365.
_Asyndesmus_, COUES, Pr. A. N. S. 1866, 55. (Type, _Picus torquatus_.)
GEN. CHAR. Bill about equal to the head; broader than high at the
base, but becoming compressed immediately anterior to the commencement
of the gonys. Culmen and gonys with a moderately decided angular
ridge; both decidedly curved from the very base. A rather prominent
acute ridge commences at the base of the mandible, a little below the
ridge of the culmen, and proceeds but a short distance anterior to the
nostrils (about one third of the way), when it sinks down, and the
bill is then smooth. The lateral outlines are gently concave from the
basal two thirds; then gently convex to the tip, which does not
exhibit any abrupt bevelling. Nostrils open, broadly oval; not
concealed by the feathers, nor entirely basal. Fork of chin less than
half lower jaw. The outer pair of toes equal. Wings long, broad;
lengthened. Tail-feathers broad, with lengthened points.
The species all have the back black, without any spots or streaks
anywhere.
[Line drawing: _Melanerpes erythrocephalus._
883 ♀]
Dr. Coues places _M. torquatus_ in a new genus, _Asyndesmus_,
characterized by a peculiar texture of the under part and nuchal
collar, in which the fibres are disconnected on their terminal
portion, enlarged and stiffened, almost bristle-like; otherwise the
characters are much as in _Melanerpes_. It should, however, be noted,
that the feathers of the red portion of the head in the other species
have the same texture.
Species and Varieties.
A. Sexes similar. _Young_ very different from the adult.
M. torquatus. Feathers of the lower parts, as well as of
frontal, lateral, and under portions of the head, with
the fibres bristle-like. (_Asyndesmus_, COUES.) Upper
parts wholly uniform, continuous, very metallic
blackish-green. _Adult._ Forehead, lores, cheeks, and
chin deep crimson, of a burnt-carmine tint; jugulum,
breast, and a ring entirely around the nape,
grayish-white; abdomen light carmine. Back glossed with
purplish-bronze. _Young_ without the red of the head,
and lacking the grayish nuchal collar; abdomen only
tinged with red, no purple or bronze tints above. Wing,
6.70; tail, 4.50. _Hab._ Western Province of the United
States, from the Black Hills to the Pacific.
M. erythrocephalus. Feathers generally soft, blended;
those of the whole head and neck with stiffened and
bristle-like fibres in the adult. Secondaries, rump, and
upper tail-coverts, with whole lower parts from the
neck, continuous pure white. Two lateral tail-feathers
tipped with white. _Adult._ Whole head and neck bright
venous-crimson or blood-red, with a black convex
posterior border across the jugulum; back, wings, and
tail glossy blue-black. _Young._ Head and neck grayish,
streaked with dusky; back and scapulars grayish, spotted
with black; secondaries with two or three black bands;
breast tinged with grayish, and with sparse dusky
streaks. Wing, 5.90; tail, 3.90. _Hab._ Eastern Province
of the United States, west to the Rocky Mountains.
B. Sexes dissimilar; young like the adult.
M. formicivorus. Forehead and a broad crescent across
the middle of the throat (the two areas connected by a
narrow strip across the lore), white, more or less
tinged with sulphur-yellow. Rump, upper tail-coverts,
abdomen, sides, and crissum, with patch on base of
primaries, pure white, the sides and breast with black
streaks. Other portions glossy blue-black.
♂. Whole crown and nape carmine. ♀ with the occiput
and nape alone red.
_More than the anterior half of the pectoral band
immaculate._
♀ with the white frontal, black coronal, and red
occipital bands of about equal width. Forehead and
throat only slightly tinged with sulphur-yellow.
Wing, 5.80; tail, 3.90; bill, 1.27. _Hab._ Pacific
Province of United States, and Northern and Western
Mexico var. _formicivorus_.
♀ with the white frontal band only about half as
wide as the black coronal, which is only about half
as wide as the red occipital, band or patch.
Forehead and throat bright sulphur-yellow. Wing,
5.40; tail, 3.65; bill, 1.23. _Hab._ Lower
California var. _angustifrons_.
_Nearly the whole of the black pectoral band
variegated with white streaks._
Relative width of the white, black, and red areas on
the crown as in _formicivorus_. Wing, 5.50; tail,
3.75; bill, 1.22. _Hab._ Middle America, south of
Orizaba and Mirador var. _striatipectus_.[131]
♂. Nape, only, red (as in females of preceding races);
♀ without any red.
Whole breast streaked, the black and white being in
about equal amount. Wing, 5.70; tail, 3.90; bill,
1.20. _Hab._ New Granada var. _flavigula_.[132]
[131] _Melanerpes formicivorus_, var. _striatipectus_,
RIDGWAY. In view of the very appreciable difference from the
other races named, it appears necessary to name this one, in
order that it may rank equally with the rest. The almost
entirely streaked breast is only an approach to what we see,
in its extreme phase, in the var. _flavigula_. The black
vertex of the female appears broader than in specimens of
var. _formicivorus_.
[132] _Melanerpes formicivorus_, var. _flavigula_, NATT.
_Melampicus flavigula_ (NATT.), MALH. Rev. Zoöl. 1849, 542,
Monog. Pic. II, 202, pl. xcix, f. 5, 6. _Melanerpes
flavigularis_, SCL. P. Z. S. 1856, 161. This can only be
considered the melanistic extreme of a species of which the
var. _formicivorus_ is the rubescent one, the transition
being gradual through the var. _striatipectus_ of the
intermediate region.
Melanerpes torquatus, BONAP.
LEWIS’S WOODPECKER.
_Picus torquatus_, WILSON, Am. Orn. III, 1811, 31, pl. xx.—WAGLER,
Syst. Av. 1827, No. 82.—AUD. Orn. Biog. V, 1839, 176, pl.
ccccxvi.—IB. Birds Amer. IV, 1842, 280, pl.
cclxxii.—SUNDEVALL, Consp. 51. _Melanerpes torquatus_, BP.
Consp. 1850, 115.—HEERMANN, J. A. N. Sc. Phil. 2d ser. II,
1853, 270.—NEWBERRY, Zoöl. Cal. & Or. Route, 90, in P. R. R.
Surv. VI, 1857.—BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 115.—COOPER & SUCKLEY,
161.—CASSIN. Pr. A. N. S. 1863, 327.—LORD, Pr. R. A. Inst.
IV, 1864, 112 (nesting).—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1, 1870, 406.
_Picus montanus_, ORD. in Guthrie’s Geog. 2d Am. ed. II, 1815,
316. _Picus lewisii_, DRAPIEZ. (Gray.) _Asyndesmus torquatus_,
COUES, Pr. A. N. S. 1866, 55.
SP. CHAR. Feathers on the under parts bristle-like. Fourth quill
longest; then third and fifth. Above dark glossy-green. Breast, lower
part of the neck, and a narrow collar all round, hoary grayish-white.
Around the base of the bill and sides of the head to behind the eyes,
dark crimson. Belly blood-red, streaked finely with hoary whitish.
Wings and tail entirely uniform dark glossy-green. Female similar.
Length about 10.50; wing, 6.50. Young without the nuchal collar, and
the red of head replaced by black.
HAB. Western America from Black Hills to Pacific.
The peculiarities in the feathers of the under parts have already been
adverted to. This structure appears to be essentially connected with
the red feathers, since these have the same texture in the other
species of the genus, wherever the color occurs. The remark may
perhaps apply generally to the red feathers of most, if not all,
Woodpeckers, and may be connected with some chemical or physical
condition yet to be determined.
HABITS. Lewis’s Woodpecker would seem to have a distribution
throughout the Pacific Coast, from the sea-shore to the mountains, and
from Puget Sound to the Gulf of California, and extending to the
eastern border of the Great Plains, within the limits of the United
States. They were first observed by Messrs. Lewis and Clarke, in their
memorable journey to the Pacific. Subsequently Mr. Nuttall met with
them in his westward journey, in the central chain of the Rocky
Mountains. This was in the month of July. Among the cedar and pine
woods of Bear River, on the edge of Upper California, he found them
inhabiting the decayed trunks of the pine-trees, and already feeding
their young. Afterwards, at the close of August, he met them in flocks
on the plains, sixty miles up the Wahlamet. He describes them as very
unlike Woodpeckers in their habits, perching in dense flocks, like
Starlings, neither climbing branches nor tapping in the manner of
their tribe, but darting after insects and devouring berries, like
Thrushes. He saw them but seldom, either in the dense forests of the
Columbia or in any settled part of California.
Townsend speaks of their arriving about the first of May on Bear River
and the Columbia. Both sexes incubate, according to his observations.
Dr. Gambel first observed this Woodpecker in a belt of oak timber near
the Mission of St. Gabriel, in California, and states that it was
abundant. He also describes its habits as peculiar, and unlike the
generality of Woodpeckers. Dr. Heermann, too, speaks of finding it in
all the parts of California which he visited. Dr. Newberry, in his
Notes on the zoölogy of Lieutenant Williamson’s expedition, refers to
it as most unlike the California Woodpecker in the region it occupies
and in its retiring habits. He describes it as seeming to choose, for
its favorite haunts, the evergreen forests upon the rocky declivities
of the Cascade and Rocky Mountains. He first observed it in Northern
California, but subsequently noticed it in the mountains all the way
to the Columbia. Though often seen in low elevations, it was evidently
alpine in its preferences, and was found most frequently near the line
of perpetual snow; and when crossing the snow lines, in the
mountain-passes, it was often observed flying far above the party. He
describes it as being always shy, and difficult to shoot.
Dr. S. W. Woodhouse describes this species as being common in the
Indian Territory and in New Mexico; while Dr. Cooper, in his Report on
the zoölogy of Washington Territory, speaks of it as being common,
during summer, in all the interior districts, but seldom or never
approaching the coast. It arrives at Puget Sound early in May, and
some even remain, during mild winters, in the Territory. According to
his account, it burrows holes for its nests at all heights from the
ground, but commonly in dead trees. The eggs are described as pure
white, and, when fresh, translucent, like those of all the Woodpecker
tribe, and hardly distinguishable in size and general appearance from
those of the Golden-winged Woodpecker (_Colaptes auratus_). Its harsh
call is rarely uttered in summer, when it seems to seek concealment
for itself and nest. The flocks of young, which in fall associate
together to the number of eight or ten, are more noisy. Dr. Suckley,
in the same Report (page 162), speaks of this Woodpecker as being very
abundant throughout the more open portions of the timbered region of
the northwest coast, preferring oak openings and groves. At Fort
Dalles, on the Columbia, they are extremely numerous, not only
breeding there during summer, but also found as winter residents.
Their breeding-places are generally holes in oak and other trees,
which, from the appearance of all he examined, seemed to have been
excavated for the purpose. At Puget Sound this species was found less
frequently than at Fort Dalles, on the Columbia. At the latter place
they were constant winter residents. Dr. Suckley also speaks of them
as being semi-gregarious in their habits.
Mr. Lord thinks that this Woodpecker is not to be met with west of the
Cascade Mountains, but says it is very often found between the
Cascades and the Rocky Mountains, where it frequents the open timber.
The habits and modes of flight of this bird, he states, are not the
least like a Woodpecker’s. It flies with a heavy flapping motion, much
like a Jay, feeds a good deal on the ground, and chases insects on the
wing like a Shrike or a Kingbird. Whilst mating they assemble in large
numbers, and keep up a continual, loud, chattering noise. They arrive
at Colville in April, begin nesting in May, and leave again in
October. The nest is in a hole in a dead pine-tree, usually at a
considerable height from the ground.
Dr. Coues says this bird is very common at Fort Whipple, in Arizona,
where it remained in moult until November.
Mr. J. A. Allen found this the most numerous of the _Picidæ_ in
Colorado Territory. He also states that it differs considerably in its
habits from all the other Woodpeckers. He frequently noticed it rising
high into the air almost vertically, and to a great height, apparently
in pursuit of insects, and descending again as abruptly, to repeat the
same manœuvre. It was met with by Mr. Ridgway in the Sacramento
Valley, along the eastern base of the Sierra Nevada, and in the East
Humboldt Mountains. In the first-mentioned locality it was the most
abundant Woodpecker, and inhabited the scattered oaks of the plains.
In the second region it was very abundant—perhaps more so than any
other species—among the scattered pines along the very base of the
eastern slope; and in the last-mentioned place was observed on a few
occasions among the tall aspens bordering the streams in the lower
portions of the cañons. In its habits it is described as approaching
most closely to our common Red-headed Woodpecker (_M. erythrocephalus_),
but possessing many very distinctive peculiarities. In the character
of its notes it quite closely approximates to our common Redhead, but
they are weaker and of a more twittering character; and in its lively
playful disposition it even exceeds it. It has a very peculiar and
characteristic habit of ascending high into the air, and taking a
strange, floating flight, seemingly laborious, as if struggling
against the wind, and then descending in broad circles to the trees.
The eggs are more spherical than are usually those of the _Colaptes
auratus_, are of a beautiful crystalline whiteness, and measure 1.10
inches in length and .92 of an inch in breadth.
Melanerpes erythrocephalus, SWAINSON.
RED-HEADED WOODPECKER.
_Picus erythrocephalus_, LINN. Syst. Nat. I, 1766, 174.—VIEILLOT,
Ois. Am. Sept. II, 1807, 60, pl. cxii, cxiii.—WILSON, Am. Orn.
I, 1810, 142, pl. ix, fig. 1.—WAGLER, Syst. Av. 1827, No.
14.—IB. Isis, 1829, 518 (young).—AUD. Orn. Biog. I, 1832,
141; V, 536, pl. xxvii.—IB. Birds America, IV, 1842, 274, pl.
cclxxi.—MAX. Cab. J. VI, 1858, 419. _Melanerpes
erythrocephalus_, SW. F. B. A. II, 1831, 316.—BON. List,
1838.—IB. Conspectus, 1850, 115.—GAMBEL, J. Ac. Nat. Sc. Ph.
2d ser. I, 1847, 55.—BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858, 113.—SCL. Cat.
1862, 340.—SAMUELS, 102.—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1, 1870,
402.—ALLEN, B. E. Fla. 307. _Picus obscurus_, GM. I, 1788, 429
(young).—_Red-headed Woodpecker_, PENNANT, KALM, LATHAM.
_White-rumped Woodpecker_, LATHAM.
SP. CHAR. Head and neck all round crimson-red, margined by a narrow
crescent of black on the upper part of the breast. Back, primary
quills, and tail bluish-black. Under parts generally, a broad band
across the middle of the wing, and the rump, white. The female is not
different. Length, about 9.75; wing, 5.50. Bill bluish-white, darker
terminally; iris chestnut; feet olive-gray. Young without any red, the
head and neck being grayish streaked with dusky; breast with an ashy
tinge, and streaked sparsely with dusky; secondaries with two or three
bands of black; dorsal region clouded with grayish.
HAB. Eastern Province of United States to base of Rocky Mountains,
sometimes straggling westward to coast of California (GAMBEL). Salt
Lake City, Utah (RIDGWAY). Other localities: Nueces to Brazos, Texas
(DRESSER, Ibis, 1865, 469, breeds).
Western specimens frequently have the abdomen strongly tinged with
salmon-red, or orange-red, and are generally more deeply colored than
eastern.
HABITS. The Red-headed Woodpecker is one of the most familiar birds of
this family, and ranges over a wide extent of territory. Excepting
where it has been exterminated by the persecutions of indiscriminate
destroyers, it is everywhere a very abundant species. Once common, it
is now rarely met with in the neighborhood of Boston, though in the
western part of Massachusetts it is still to be found. In the
collections of the Smithsonian Institution are specimens from
Pennsylvania, Wyoming, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Louisiana, the
Indian Territory, etc. Sir John Richardson speaks of it as ranging in
summer as far north as the northern shores of Lake Huron. He also
remarks that in the Hudson Bay Museum there is a specimen from the
banks of the Columbia River. Dr. Gambel, in his paper on the birds of
California, states that he saw many of them in a belt of oak timber
near the Mission of St. Gabriel. As, however, Dr. Heermann did not
meet with it in California, and as no other collector has obtained
specimens in that State, this is probably a mistake. With the
exception of Dr. Woodhouse, who speaks of having found this species in
the Indian Territory and in Texas, it is not mentioned by any of the
government exploring parties. It may therefore be assigned a range
extending, in summer, as far north as Labrador, and westward to the
eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Throughout the year it is a
permanent resident only of the more southern States, where it is,
however, much less abundant in summer than it is in Pennsylvania.
Wilson, at the time of his writing (1808), speaks of finding several
of the nests of this Woodpecker within the boundaries of the then city
of Philadelphia, two of them being in buttonwood-trees and one in the
decayed limb of an elm. The parent birds made regular excursions to
the woods beyond the Schuylkill, and preserved a silence and
circumspection in visiting their nest entirely unlike their habits in
their wilder places of residence. The species is altogether migratory,
visiting the Middle and Northern States early in May and leaving in
October. It begins the construction of its nest almost immediately
after its first appearance, as with other members of its family, by
excavations made in the trunk or larger limbs of trees, depositing six
white eggs on the bare wood. The cavities for their nests are made
almost exclusively in dead wood, rarely, if ever, in the living
portion of the tree. In Texas, Louisiana, Kentucky, and the Carolinas,
they have two broods in a season, but farther north than this they
rarely raise more than one. Their eggs are usually six in number, and,
like all the eggs of this family, are pure white and translucent when
fresh. They vary a little in their shape, but are usually slightly
more oval and less spherical than those of several other species. Mr.
Nuttall speaks of the eggs of this bird as being said to be marked at
the larger end with reddish spots. I have never met with any thus
marked, and as Mr. Nuttall does not give it as from his own
observations I have no doubt that it is a mistake. Mr. Paine, of
Randolph, Vt., writes that he has only seen a single specimen of this
Woodpecker in that part of Vermont, while on the western side of the
Green Mountains they are said to be very common. He adds that it is a
tradition among his older neighbors that these Woodpeckers were
formerly everywhere known throughout all portions of the State.
Mr. Ridgway saw a single individual of this species in the outskirts
of Salt Lake City, in July, 1869.
Their eggs vary both in size and in shape, from a spherical to an
oblong-oval, the latter being the more usual. Their length varies from
1.10 to 1.15 inches, and their breadth from .80 to .90 of an inch.
Melanerpes formicivorus, var. formicivorus, BONAP.
CALIFORNIA WOODPECKER.
_Picus formicivorus_, SWAINSON, Birds Mex. in Philos. Mag. I, 1827,
439 (Mexico).—VIGORS, Zoöl. Blossom, 1839, 23
(Monterey).—NUTTALL, Man. I, 2d ed. 1840. _Melanerpes
formicivorus_, BP. Conspectus, 1850, 115.—HEERMANN, J. A. N.
Sc. Phil. 2d series, II, 1853, 270.—CASSIN, Illust. II, 1853,
11, pl. ii.—NEWBERRY, Zoöl. Cal. & Oregon Route, 90, P. R. R.
Surv. VI, 1857.—BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1868, 114.—SUMICHRAST,
Mem. Bost. Soc. I, 1865, 562 (correcting an error of
Saussure).—CASSIN, Pr. A. N. S. 63, 328.—HEERMANN, P. R. R.
X, 58 (nesting).—BAIRD, Rep. M. Bound. II, Birds, 6.—SCLATER,
Pr. Z. S. 1858, 305 (Oaxaca).—IB. Ibis, 137 (Honduras).—CAB.
Jour. 1862, 322 (Costa Rica).—COUES, Pr. A. N. S. 1866,
55.—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1, 1870, 403. _Picus melanopogon_,
TEMMINCK, Pl. Color. IV, (1829?) pl. ccccli.—WAGLER, Isis,
1829, v, 515.—SUNDEVALL, Consp. 51.
[Illustration: _Melanerpes formicivorus._]
SP. CHAR. Fourth quill longest, third a little shorter. Above and on
the anterior half of the body, glossy bluish or greenish black; the
top of the head and a short occipital crest red. A white patch on the
forehead, connecting with a broad crescentic collar on the upper part
of the neck by a narrow isthmus, white tinged with sulphur-yellow.
Belly, rump, bases of primaries, and inner edges of the outer quills,
white. Tail-feathers uniform black. Female with the red confined to
the occipital crest, the rest replaced by greenish-black; the three
patches white, black, and red, very sharply defined, and about equal.
Length about 9.50; wing, 6.00; tail, 3.75.
HAB. Pacific Coast region of the United States and south; in Northern
Mexico, eastward almost to the Gulf of Mexico; also on the Upper Rio
Grande; south to Costa Rica. Localities: Oaxaca (SCL. P. Z. S. 1858,
305); Cordova (SCL. 1856, 307); Guatemala (SCL. Ibis, I, 137);
Honduras (SCL. Cat. 341); Costa Rica (CAB. J. 1862, 322); W. Arizona
(COUES, P. A. N. S. 1866, 55).
In most specimens one or two red feathers may be detected in the black
of the breast just behind the sulphur-yellow crescent. The white of
the breast is streaked with black; the posterior portion of the black
of the breast and anterior belly streaked with white. The white of the
wing only shows externally as a patch at the base of the primaries.
[Illustration: PLATE LIII.
1. Melanerpes formicivorus. ♂ Cal., 5495.
2. ” ” ♀ Cal., 25035.
3. ” angustifrons. ♂ Cape St. Lucas, 25947.
4. ” ” ♀ ” ” 25949.]
Dr. Coues calls attention to extraordinary differences in the color of
the iris, which varies from white to red, blue, yellow, ochraceous, or
brown. A mixture of blue, he thinks, indicates immaturity, and a
reddish tinge the full spring coloration.
The male of this species has a white forehead extending a little
backwards of the anterior edge of the eye, the rest of the top of head
to the nape being red. The female has the white forehead, and a
quadrate occipito-nuchal red patch, a black band about as broad as the
white one separating the latter from the occipital red. The length of
the two anterior bands together is decidedly greater than that of the
posterior red. In both sexes the jugulum is entirely and continuously
black. Anteriorly (generally with a red spot in its anterior edge) and
on the feathers of its posterior border only are these elongated white
spots, on each side the shaft, the feathers of the breast being
streaked centrally with black. The inner webs of the secondaries have
an elongated continuous patch of white along their internal edge, with
a very slight, almost inappreciable, border of black; this white only
very rarely converted partly or entirely into quadrate spots, and that
never on the innermost quills marked with white. Specimens from
California are very similar to those from the Rocky Mountains and the
Rio Grande Valley, except, perhaps, in being larger, with longer and
straighter bill.
In _M. flavigula_ from Bogota, the male has the head marked with the
red, black, and white (the red much less in extent, however) of the
female _M. formicivorus_, while the female has no red whatever. All,
or nearly all, the feathers of the jugulum have the two white spots,
and (as pointed out by Reichenbach) the white of the inner webs of the
inner quills is entirely converted into a series of non-confluent
quadrate spots. The black streaks on the sides and behind appear to be
of greater magnitude, and more uniformly distributed. In both species
all the tail-feathers are perfectly black.
A Guatemalan bird, received from Mr. Salvin as _M. formicivorus_,—and
indeed all specimens from Orizaba and Mirador to Costa Rica,—agrees
in the main with the northern bird, except that all the black feathers
of the jugulum have white spots, as in _M. flavigula_. The outermost
tail-feather of Mr. Salvin’s specimen has two narrow transverse
whitish bands, and a spot indicating a third, as well as a light tip.
The white markings on the inner quills are more like the northern
bird, though on the outermost ones there is the same tendency to form
spots as in a few northern specimens (as 6,149 from Los Nogales, &c.).
The bill is very different from either in being shorter, broader, much
stouter, and the culmen more decurved.
These peculiarities, which are constant, appear to indicate a decided
or strongly marked variety, as a series of almost a hundred specimens
of the northern bird from many localities exhibit none of the
characters mentioned, while all of an equally large series from
Central America agree in possessing them.
A series of Jalapan specimens from the cabinet of Mr. Lawrence show a
close relationship to skins from the Rio Grande, and do not approach
the Guatemalan bird in the peculiar characters just referred to,
except in the shortness and curvature of the bill. In one specimen
there is an approach to the Bogotan in a moderate degree of barring on
the white inner edgings of the tertials; in the rest, however, they
are continuously white.
HABITS. This handsome Woodpecker, distinguished both by the remarkable
beauty of its plumage and the peculiarity of its provident habits, has
a widely extended area of distribution, covering the Pacific Coast,
from Oregon throughout Mexico. In Central America it is replaced by
the variety _striatipectus_, and in New Grenada by the var.
_flavigula_, while at Cape St. Lucas we find another local form, _M.
angustifrons_. So far as we have the means of ascertaining their
habits, we find no mention of any essential differences in this
respect among these races.
Suckley and Cooper did not meet with this bird in Washington
Territory, and Mr. Lord met with it in abundance on his journey from
Yreka to the boundary line of British Columbia. Mr. Dresser did not
observe it at San Antonio. Mr. Clark met with it at the Coppermines,
in New Mexico, in great numbers, and feeding principally among the
oaks. Lieutenant Couch found it in the recesses of the Sierra Madre
quite common and very tame, resorting to high trees in search of its
food. He did not meet with it east of the Sierra Madre. Dr. Kennerly
first observed it in the vicinity of Santa Cruz, where it was very
frequent on the mountain-slopes, always preferring the tallest trees,
but very shy, and it was with difficulty that a specimen could be
procured. Mr. Nuttall, who first added this bird to our fauna, speaks
of it as very plentiful in the forests around Santa Barbara. Between
that region and the Pueblo de los Angeles, Dr. Gambel met with it in
great abundance, although neither writer makes mention of any
peculiarities of habit. Mr. Emanuel Samuels met with it in and around
Petaluma, where he obtained the eggs.
Dr. Newberry, in his Report on the zoölogy of Lieutenant Williamson’s
route (P. R. R. Reports, VI), states that the range of this species
extends to the Columbia, and perhaps above, to the westward of the
Cascade Range, though more common in California than in Oregon. It was
not found in the Des Chutes Basin, nor in the Cascade Mountains.
In the list of the birds of Guatemala given by Mr. Salvin in the Ibis,
this Woodpecker is mentioned (I, p. 137) as being found in the Central
Region, at Calderas, on the Volcan de Fuego, in forests of evergreen
oaks, where it feeds on acorns.
Dr. Heermann describes it as among the noisiest as well as the most
abundant of the Woodpeckers of California. He speaks of it as catching
insects on the wing, after the manner of a Flycatcher, and mentions
its very extraordinary habit of digging small holes in the bark of the
pine and the oak, in which it stores acorns for its food in winter. He
adds that one of these acorns is placed in each hole, and is so
tightly fitted or driven in that it is with difficulty extracted.
Thus, the bark of a large pine forty or fifty feet high will present
the appearance of being closely studded with brass nails, the heads
only being visible. These acorns are thus stored in large quantities,
and serve not only the Woodpecker, but trespassers as well. Dr.
Heermann speaks of the nest as being excavated in the body of the tree
to a depth varying from six inches to two feet, the eggs being four or
five in number, and pure white.
These very remarkable and, for a Woodpecker, somewhat anomalous
habits, first mentioned among American writers by Dr. Heermann, have
given rise to various conflicting statements and theories in regard to
the design of these collections of acorns. Some have even ventured to
discredit the facts, but these are too well authenticated to be
questioned. Too many naturalists whose accuracy cannot be doubted have
been eyewitnesses to these performances. Among these is Mr. J. K.
Lord, who, however, was constrained to confess his utter inability to
explain why the birds did so. He was never able to find an acorn that
seemed to have been eaten, nor a trace of vegetable matter in their
stomachs, and at the close of his investigations he frankly admitted
this storing of acorns to be a mystery for which he could offer no
satisfactory explanation.
M. H. de Saussure, the Swiss naturalist, in an interesting paper
published in 1858 in the _Bibliothèque Universelle_ of Geneva,
furnishes some very interesting observations on the habits of a
Woodpecker, which he supposed to be the _Colaptes mexicanoides_ of
Mexico, of storing collections of acorns in the hollow stems of the
maguay plants. Sumichrast, who accompanied Saussure in his excursion,
while recognizing the entire truth of the interesting facts he
narrates, is confident that the credit of all this instinctive
forethought belongs not to the _Colaptes_, but to the Mexican race of
this species. Saussure’s article being too long to quote in full, we
give an abstract.
The slopes of a volcanic mountain, Pizarro, near Perote, in Mexico,
are covered with immense beds of the maguay (_Agave americana_), with
larger growths of yuccas, but without any other large shrubs or trees.
Saussure was surprised to find this silent and dismal wilderness
swarming with Woodpeckers. A circumstance so unusual as this large
congregation of birds, by nature so solitary, in a spot so
unattractive, prompted him to investigate the mystery. The birds were
seen to fly first to the stalks of the maguay, to attack them with
their beaks, and then to pass to the yuccas, and there repeat their
labors. These stalks, upon examination, were all found to be riddled
with holes, placed irregularly one above another, and communicating
with the hollow cavity within. On cutting open one of these stalks, he
found it filled with acorns.
As is well known, this plant, after flowering, dies, its stalk
remains, its outer covering hardens into a flinty texture, and its
centre becomes hollow. This convenient cavity is used by the
Woodpecker as a storehouse for provisions that are unusual food for
the tribe. The central cavity of the stalk is only large enough to
receive one acorn at a time. They are packed in, one above the other,
until the cavity is full. How did these Woodpeckers first learn to
thus use these storehouses, by nature closed against them? The
intelligent instinct that enabled this bird to solve this problem
Saussure regarded as not the least surprising feature. With its beak
it pierces a small round hole through the lower portion into the
central cavity, and thrusts in acorns until the hollow is filled to
the level of the hole. It then makes a second opening higher up, and
fills the space below in a like manner, and so proceeds until the
entire stalk is full. Sometimes the space is too small to receive the
acorns, and they have to be forced in by blows from its beak. In other
stalks there are no cavities, and then the Woodpecker creates one for
each acorn, forcing it into the centre of the pith.
The labor necessary to enable the bird to accomplish all this is very
considerable, and great industry is required to collect its stores;
but, once collected, the storehouse is a very safe and convenient one.
Mount Pizarro is in the midst of a barren desert of sand and volcanic
_débris_. There are no oak-trees nearer than the Cordilleras, thirty
miles distant, and therefore the collecting and storing of each acorn
required a flight of sixty miles.
This, reasons Saussure, is obviously an instinctive preparation, on
the part of these birds, to provide the means of supporting life
during the arid winter months, when no rain falls and everything is
parched. His observations were made in April, the last of the winter
months; and he found the Woodpeckers withdrawing food from their
depositories, and satisfied himself that the birds were eating the
acorn itself, and not the diminutive maggots a few of them contained.
The ingenuity with which the bird managed to get at the contents of
each acorn was also quite striking. Its feet being unfit for grasping
the acorn, it digs a hole into the dry bark of the yuccas, just large
enough to receive the small end of the acorn, which it inserts, making
use of its bill to split it open, as with a wedge. The trunks of the
yuccas were all found riddled with these holes.
There are several remarkable features to be noticed in the facts
observed by Saussure,—the provident instinct which prompts this bird
to lay by stores of provisions for the winter; the great distance
traversed to collect a kind of food so unusual for its race; and its
seeking, in a spot so remote from its natural abode, a storehouse so
remarkable. Can instinct alone teach, or have experience and reason
taught, these birds, that, better far than the bark of trees, or
cracks in rocks, or cavities dug in the earth, or any other known
hiding-place, are these hidden cavities within the hollow stems of
distant plants? What first taught them how to break through the flinty
coverings of these retreats? By what revelation could these birds have
been informed that within these dry and closed stalks they could, by
searching, find suitable places, protected from moisture, for
preserving their stores in a state most favorable for their long
preservation, safe from gnawing rats, and from those acorn-eating
birds whose bills are not strong or sharp enough to cut through their
tough enclosures?
M. Sumichrast, who afterwards enjoyed unusual opportunities for
observing the habits of these Woodpeckers in the State of Vera Cruz,
states that they dwell exclusively in oak woods, and that near
Potrero, as well as in the alpine regions, trunks of oak-trees are
found pierced with small holes in circular lines around their
circumference. Into each of these holes these birds drive the acorns
by repeated blows of their beaks, so as to fix them firmly. At other
times they make their collection of acorns in openings between the
raised bark of dry trees and the trunks. This writer states that he
has sought in vain to explain such performances satisfactorily. The
localities in which these birds reside, in Mexico, teem at all seasons
with insects; and it seems absurd, therefore, to suppose that they can
be in quest of the small, almost microscopic, larvæ contained in the
acorns.
Dr. C. T. Jackson sought to account for these interesting performances
on the ingenious hypothesis that the acorns thus stored are always
infested with larvæ, and never sound ones; that they are driven into
the tree cup-end foremost, so as to securely imprison the maggot and
prevent its escape, and thus enable the Woodpecker to devour it at its
leisure. This would argue a wonderful degree of intelligence and
forethought, on the part of the Woodpecker, and more than it is
entitled to; for the facts do not sustain this hypothesis. The acorns
are not put into the tree with the cup-end in, but invariably the
reverse, so far as we have noticed; and the acorns, so far from being
wormy, are, in nine cases out of ten, sound ones. Besides, this theory
affords no explanation of the large collections of loose acorns made
by these birds in hollow trees, or in the stalks of the maguay plants.
Nor can we understand why, if so intelligent, they make so little use
of these acorns, as seems to be the almost universal testimony of
California naturalists. And, as still further demonstrating the
incorrectness of this hypothesis, we have recently been informed by
Dr. Canfield of Monterey, Cal., that occasionally these Woodpeckers,
following an instinct so blind that they do not distinguish between an
acorn and a pebble, are known to fill up the holes they have drilled
with so much labor, not only with acorns, but occasionally with
stones. In time the bark and the wood grow over these, and after a few
years they are left a long way from the surface. These trees are
usually the sugar-pine of California, a wood much used for lumber.
Occasionally one of these trees is cut, the log taken to mill without
its being known that it is thus charged with rounded pieces of flint
or agate, and the saws that come in contact with them are broken.
Without venturing to present an explanation of facts that have
appeared so contradictory and unsatisfactory to other naturalists,
such as we can claim to be either comprehensive or entirely
satisfactory, we cannot discredit the positive averments of such
observers as Saussure and Salvin. We believe that these Woodpeckers do
eat the acorns, when they can do no better. And when we are confronted
with the fact, which we do not feel at liberty to altogether
disregard, that in very large regions this bird seems to labor in
vain, and makes no use of the treasures it has thus heaped together,
we can only attempt an explanation. This Woodpecker is found over an
immense area. It everywhere has the same instinctive promptings to
provide, not “for a rainy day,” but for the exact opposite,—for a
long interval during which no rain falls, for nearly two hundred days
at a time, in all the low and hot lands of Mexico and Central America.
There these accumulations become a necessity, there we are informed
they do eat the acorns, and, more than this, many other birds and
beasts derive the means of self-preservation in times of famine from
the provident labors of this bird. That in Oregon, in California, and
in the mountains of Mexico and elsewhere, where better and more
natural food offers throughout the year, it is rarely known to eat the
acorns it has thus labored to save, only seems to prove that it acts
under the influences of an undiscriminating instinct that prompts it
to gather in its stores whether it needs them or not.
It may be, too, that writers have too hastily inferred that these
birds never eat the acorns, because they have been unable to obtain
complete evidence of the fact. We have recently received from C. W.
Plass, Esq., some interesting facts, which, if they do not prove that
these birds in the winter visit their stores and eat their acorns,
render it highly probable. Mr. Plass resides near Napa City, Cal.,
near which city, and on the edge of the pine forests, he has recently
constructed a house. The gable-ends of this dwelling the California
Woodpeckers have found a very convenient storehouse for their acorns,
and Mr. Plass has very considerately permitted them to do so
unmolested. The window in the gable slides up upon pullies its whole
length, to admit of a passage to the upper verandah, and the open
space in the wall admits of the nuts falling down into the upper hall,
and this frequently happens when the birds attempt to extricate them
from the outside. Nearly all these nuts are found to be sound, and
contain no worm, while those that fall outside are empty shells. Empty
shells have also been noticed by Mr. Plass under the trees, indicating
that the acorns have been eaten.
The Smithsonian Institution has received specimens of the American
race of this Woodpecker, collected at Belize by Dr. Berendt, and
accompanied by illustrations of their work in the way of implantation
of acorns in the bark of trees.
The eggs of this Woodpecker, obtained by Mr. Emanuel Samuels near
Petaluma, Cal., and now in the collection of the Boston Society of
Natural History, are undistinguishable from the eggs of other
Woodpeckers in form or color, except that they are somewhat oblong,
and measure 1.12 inches in length by .90 of an inch in breadth.
Melanerpes formicivorus, var. angustifrons, BAIRD.
THE NARROW-FRONTED WOODPECKER.
_Melanerpes formicivorus_, var. _angustifrons_, BAIRD, COOPER, Orn.
Cal. I, 1870, 405.
SP. CHAR. Compared with _M. formicivorus_, the size is smaller. The
light frontal bar is much narrower; in the female scarcely more than
half the black one behind it, and not reaching anything like as far
back as the anterior border of the eye, instead of exceeding this
limit. The light frontal and the black bars together are only about
two thirds the length of the occipital red, instead of exceeding it in
length; the red patch reaches forward nearly or quite to the posterior
border of the eye, instead of falling a considerable distance behind
it, and being much broader posteriorly. The frontal band too is
gamboge-yellow, much like the throat, and not white; the connection
with the yellow throat-patch much broader. The white upper
tail-coverts show a tendency to a black edge. Length, 8.00; wing,
5.20; tail, 3.20.
HAB. Cape St. Lucas.
As the differences mentioned are constant, we consider the Cape St.
Lucas bird as forming at least a permanent variety, and indicate it as
above. A single specimen from the Sierra Madre, of Colima, is very
similar.
HABITS. We have no information as to the habits of this singular race
of the _M. formicivorus_, found at Cape St. Lucas by Mr. John Xantus.
It will be an interesting matter for investigation to ascertain to
what extent the totally different character of the region in which
this bird is met with from those in which the _M. formicivorus_ is
found, may have modified its habits and its manner of life.
SECTION COLAPTEÆ.
This section, formerly embracing but one genus additional to
_Colaptes_, has recently had three more added to it by Bonaparte. The
only United States representative, however, is _Colaptes_.
GENUS COLAPTES, SWAINSON.
_Colaptes_, SWAINSON, Zoöl. Jour. III, Dec. 1827, 353. (Type,
_Cuculus auratus_, LINN.)
_Geopicos_, MALHERBE, Mém. Acad. Metz, 1849, 358. (_G. campestris._)
GEN. CHAR. Bill slender, depressed at the base, then compressed.
Culmen much curved, gonys straight; both with acute ridges, and coming
to quite a sharp point with the commissure at the end; the bill,
consequently, not truncate at the end. No ridges on the bill. Nostrils
basal, median, oval, and exposed. Gonys very short; about half the
culmen. Feet large; the anterior outer toe considerably longer than
the posterior. Tail long, exceeding the secondaries; the feathers
suddenly acuminate, with elongated points.
[Line drawing: _Colaptes auratus._
1341 ♂]
There are four well-marked representatives of the typical genus
_Colaptes_ belonging to Middle and North America, three of them found
within the limits of the United States, in addition to what has been
called a hybrid between two of them. The common and distinctive
characters of these four are as follows:—
Species and Varieties.
COMMON CHARACTERS. Head and neck ashy or brown, unvaried
except by a black or red malar patch in the male. Back and
wings brown, banded transversely with black; rump and upper
tail-coverts white. Beneath whitish, with circular black
spots, and bands on crissum; a black pectoral crescent.
Shafts and under surfaces of quills and tail-feathers either
yellow or red.
A. Mustache red; throat ash; no red nuchal crescent.
_a._ Under surface and shafts of wings and tail red.
1. C. mexicanoides.[133] Hood bright cinnamon-rufous;
feathers of mustache black below surface. Upper parts
barred with black and whitish-brown, the two colors of
about equal width. Shafts, etc., dull brick-red. Rump
spotted with black; black terminal zone of under
surface of tail narrow, badly defined. Wing, 6.15;
tail, 4.90; bill, 1.77. _Hab._ Southern Mexico and
Guatemala.
2. C. mexicanus.[134] Hood ashy-olivaceous, more
rufescent anteriorly, light cinnamon on lores and
around eyes; feathers of mustache light ash below
surface. Upper parts umber-brown, barred with black,
the black only about one fourth as wide as the brown.
Shafts, etc., fine salmon-red, or pinkish orange-red.
Rump unspotted; black terminal zone of tail broad,
sharply defined. Wing, 6.70; tail, 5.00; bill, 1.60.
_Hab._ Middle and Western Province of United States,
south into Eastern Mexico to Mirador and Orizaba, and
Jalapa.
_b._ Under surface and shafts of wings and tail
gamboge-yellow.
3. C. chrysoides. Hood uniform light cinnamon; upper
parts raw umber with sparse, very narrow and distant,
bars of black. Rump immaculate; black terminal zone of
tail occupying nearly the terminal half, and very
sharply defined. Wing, 5.90; tail, 5.70; bill, 1.80.
_Hab._ Colorado and Cape St. Lucas region of Southern
Middle Province of United States.
B. Mustache black; a red nuchal crescent. Throat pinkish,
hood ashy.
4. C. auratus. Shafts, etc., gamboge-yellow; upper
parts olivaceous-brown, with narrow bars of black,
about half as wide as the brown.
Rump immaculate; black terminal zone of under
surface of tail broad, more than half an inch wide
on outer feather. Edges of tail-feathers narrowly
edged, but not indented, with whitish. Outer web of
lateral feathers without spots of dusky. Wing, 6.10;
tail, 4.80; bill, 1.58. _Hab._ Eastern Province of
North America var. _auratus_.
Rump spotted with black; black terminal zone of tail
narrow, consisting on outer feather of an irregular
spot less than a quarter of an inch wide. Edges of
all the tail-feathers indented with whitish bars;
outer web of lateral feathers with quadrate spots of
dusky along the edge. Wing, 5.75; tail, 4.75; bill,
1.60. _Hab._ Cuba var. _chrysocaulosus_.[135]
[Illustration: PLATE LIV.
1. Colaptes chrysoides. ♂ Arizona, 107.
2. ” ” ♀ Cape St. Lucas.
3. ” hybridus. ♂ Neb., 5214.
4. Melanerpes erythrocephalus. ♂ Neb., 38303.
5. ” torquatus. ♂ Cal., 6138.]
[133] _Colaptes mexicanoides_, LAFR. Rev. Zoöl. 1844,
42.—SCL. & SALV. Ibis, 1859, 137.—SCL. Catal. Am. B. 1862,
344. _Colaptes rubricatus_, GRAY, Gen. B. pl. cxi. _Geopicus
rub._ MALH. Monog. Pic. II, 265, pl. cx, figs. 1, 2. _Picus
submexicanus_, SUND. Consp. Pic. 1866, 72.
[134] A series of hybrids between _mexicanus_ and _auratus_
is in the Smithsonian collection, these specimens exhibiting
every possible combination of the characters of the two.
[135] _Colaptes auratus_, var. _chrysocaulosus_. _Colaptes
chrysocaulosus_, GUNDLACH, Boston Journal.—IB. Repert. I,
1866, 294.
Colaptes auratus, SWAINSON.
FLICKER; YELLOW-SHAFTED WOODPECKER; HIGH-HOLDER.
_Cuculus auratus_, LINN. Syst. Nat., I, (ed. 10,) 1758, 112. _Picus
auratus_, LINN. Syst. Nat. 1, (ed. 12,) 1766, 174.—FORSTER,
Phil. Trans. LXII, 1772, 383.—VIEILLOT, Ois. Am. Sept. II,
1807, 66, pl. cxxiii.—WILSON, Am. Orn. I, 1810, 45, pl. iii,
f. 1.—WAGLER, Syst. Av. 1827, No. 84.—AUD. Orn. Biog. I,
1832, 191; V, 540, pl. xxxvii.—IB. Birds Amer. IV, 1842, 282,
pl. cclxxiii.—SUNDEVALL, Consp. 71. _Colaptes auratus_, SW.
Zoöl. Jour. III, 1827, 353.—IB. F. Bor. Am. II, 1831,
314.—BON. List, 1838.—IB. Conspectus, 1850, 113.—BAIRD,
Birds N. Am. 1858, 118.—MAX. Cab. Jour. 1858, 420.—DRESSER,
Ibis, 1865, 470 (San Antonio, one specimen only seen).—SCL.
Cat. 1862, 344.—GRAY, Cat. 1868, 120.—FOWLER, Am. Nat. III,
1869, 422.—DALL & BANNISTER, Tr. Chicago Ac. I, 1869, 275
(Alaska).—SAMUELS, 105.—ALLEN, B. E. Fla. 307.
SP. CHAR. Shafts and under surfaces of wing and tail feathers
gamboge-yellow. Male with a black patch on each side of the cheek. A
red crescent on the nape. Throat and stripe beneath the eye pale
lilac-brown. Back glossed with olivaceous-green. Female without the
black cheek-patch.
ADDITIONAL CHARACTERS. A crescentic patch on the breast and rounded
spots on the belly black. Back and wing-coverts with interrupted
transverse bands of black. Neck above and on the sides ashy. Beneath
pale pinkish-brown, tinged with yellow on the abdomen, each feather
with a heart-shaped spot of black near the end. Rump white. Length,
12.50; wing, 6.00.
HAB. All of eastern North America to the eastern slopes of Rocky
Mountains; farther north, extending across along the Yukon as far at
least as Nulato, perhaps to the Pacific. Greenland (REINHARDT).
Localities: San Antonio, Texas, only one specimen (DRESSER, Ibis,
1865, 470).
Specimens vary considerably in size and proportions; the more northern
ones are much the larger. The spots vary in number and in size; they
may be circular, or transversely or longitudinally oval. Western
specimens appear paler. In a Selkirk Settlement specimen the belly is
tinged with pale sulphur-yellow, the back with olivaceous-green.
This species, in general pattern of coloration, resembles the _C.
mexicanus_, although the colors are very different. Thus the shafts of
the quills, with their under surfaces, are gamboge-yellow, instead of
orange-red. There is a conspicuous nuchal crescent of crimson wanting,
or but slightly indicated, in _mexicanus_. The cheek-patch is pure
black, widening and abruptly truncate behind, instead of bright
crimson, pointed or rounded behind. The shade of the upper parts is
olivaceous-green, instead of purplish-brown. The top of the head and
the nape are more ashy. The chin, throat, neck, and sides of the head,
are pale purplish or lilac brown, instead of bluish-ash; the space
above, below, and around the eye of the same color, instead of having
reddish-brown above and ashy below.
The young of this species is sufficiently like the adult to be readily
recognizable. Sometimes the entire crown is faintly tipped with red,
as characteristic of young Woodpeckers.
HABITS. The Golden-winged Woodpecker is altogether the most common and
the most widely distributed of the North American representatives of
the genus. According to Sir John Richardson, it visits the fur
countries in the summer, extending its migrations as far to the north
as the Great Slave Lake, and resorting in great numbers to the plains
of the Saskatchewan. It was found by Dr. Woodhouse very abundant in
Texas and the Indian Territory, and it is given by Reinhardt as
occurring in Greenland. Mr. McFarlane found it breeding at Fort
Anderson; Mr. Ross at Fort Rae, Fort Resolution, and Fort Simpson; and
Mr. Kennicott at Fort Yukon. All this testimony demonstrates a
distribution throughout the entire eastern portion of North America,
from the Gulf of Mexico almost to the Arctic Ocean, and from the
Atlantic to the Rocky Mountains.
In the more northern portions of the continent this bird is only a
summer visitant, but in the Southern and Middle, and to some extent in
the New England States, it is a permanent resident. Wilson speaks of
seeing them exposed for sale in the markets of Philadelphia during
each month of a very rigorous winter. Wilson’s observations of their
habits during breeding, made in Pennsylvania, were that early in April
they begin to prepare their nest. This is built in the hollow body or
branch of a tree, sometimes, though not always, at a considerable
height from the ground. He adds that he has frequently known them to
fix on the trunk of an old apple-tree, at a height not more than six
feet from the root. He also mentions as quite surprising the sagacity
of this bird in discovering, under a sound bark, a hollow limb or
trunk of a tree, and its perseverance in perforating it for purposes
of incubation. The male and female alternately relieve and encourage
each other by mutual caresses, renewing their labors for several days,
till the object is attained, and the place rendered sufficiently
capacious, convenient, and secure. They are often so extremely intent
upon their work as to be heard at their labor till a very late hour in
the night. Wilson mentions one instance where he knew a pair to dig
first five inches straight forward, and then downward more than twice
that distance, into a solid black-oak. They carry in no materials for
their nest, the soft chips and dust of the wood serving for this
purpose. The female lays six white eggs, almost transparent, very
thick at the greater end, and tapering suddenly to the other. The
young soon leave the nest, climbing to the higher branches, where they
are fed by their parents.
According to Mr. Audubon this Woodpecker rears two broods in a season,
the usual number of eggs being six. In one instance, however, Mr.
MacCulloch, quoted by Audubon, speaks of having found a nest in a
rotten stump, which contained no less than eighteen young birds, of
various ages, and at least two eggs not quite hatched. It is not
improbable that, in cases where the number of eggs exceeds seven or
eight, more females than one have contributed to the number. In one
instance, upon sawing off the decayed top of an old tree, in which
these birds had a nest, twelve eggs were found. These were not
molested, but, on visiting the place a few days after, I found the
excavation to have been deepened from eighteen to twenty-four inches.
Mr. C. S. Paine, of Randolph, Vt., writing in October, 1860, furnishes
some interesting observations made in regard to these birds in the
central part of that State. He says, “This Woodpecker is very common,
and makes its appearance about the 20th of April. Between the 1st and
the 15th of May it usually commences boring a hole for the nest, and
deposits its eggs the last of May or the first of June.” He found
three nests that year, all of which were in old stumps on the banks of
a small stream. Each nest contained _seven_ eggs. The boy who took
them out was able to do so without any cutting, and found them at the
depth of his elbow. In another nest there were but three eggs when
first discovered. The limb was cut down nearly to a level with the
eggs, which were taken. The next day the nest had been deepened a
whole foot and another egg deposited. Mr. Paine has never known them
go into thick woods to breed, but they seem rather to prefer the edges
of woods. He has never known one to breed in an old cavity, but in one
instance a pair selected a partially decayed stump for their
operations. When they are disturbed, they sometimes fly around their
nests, uttering shrill, squeaking notes, occasionally intermixing with
them guttural or gurgling tones.
It is probably true that they usually excavate their own burrow, but
this is not an invariable rule. In the fall of 1870 a pair of these
Woodpeckers took shelter in my barn, remaining there during the
winter. Although there were abundant means of entrance and of egress,
they wrought for themselves other passages out and in through the most
solid part of the sides of the building. Early in the spring they took
possession of a large cavity in an old apple-tree, directly on the
path between the barn and the house, where they reared their family.
They were very shy, and rarely permitted themselves to be seen. The
nest contained six young, each of which had been hatched at successive
intervals, leaving the nest one after the other. The youngest was
nearly a fortnight later to depart than the first. Just before leaving
the nest, the oldest bird climbed to the opening of the cavity,
filling the whole space, and uttering a loud hissing sound whenever
the nest was approached. As soon as they could use their wings, even
partially, they were removed, one by one, to a more retired part of
the grounds, where they were fed by their parents.
Throughout Massachusetts, this bird, generally known as the Pigeon
Woodpecker, is one of the most common and familiar birds. They abound
in old orchards and groves, and manifest more apparent confidence in
man than the treatment they receive at his hands seems to justify.
Their nests are usually constructed at the distance of only a few feet
from the ground, and though Wilson, Audubon, and Nuttall agree upon
six as the average of their eggs, they frequently exceed this number.
Mr. Audubon gives as the measurement of the eggs of this species 1.08
inches in length and .88 of an inch in breadth. Their length varies
from 1.05 to 1.15 inches, and their breadth from .91 to .85 of an
inch. Their average measurement is 1.09 by .88 of an inch.
Colaptes mexicanus, SWAINSON.
RED-SHAFTED FLICKER.
_Colaptes mexicanus_, SW. Syn. Mex. Birds, in Philos. Mag. I, 1827,
440.—IB. F. Bor. Am. II, 1831, 315.—NEWBERRY, Zoöl. Cal. &
Or. Route, 91; P. R. R. Rep. VI, 1857.—BAIRD, Birds N. Am.
1858, 120.—MAX. Cab. Jour. 1858, 420, mixed with
_hybridus_.—LORD, Proc. R. Art. Inst. I, IV, 112.—COOPER &
SUCKLEY, 163.—SCLATER, P. Z. S. 1858, 309 (Oaxaca).—IB. Cat.
1862, 344.—DRESSER, Ibis, 1865, 470 (San Antonio,
rare).—COUES, Pr. A. N. S. 1866, 56.—SUMICHRAST, Mem. Bost.
Soc. I, 1869, 562 (alpine district, Vera Cruz).—GRAY, Cat.
1868, 121.—DALL & BANNISTER, Pr. Chicago Ac. I, 1869, 275
(Alaska).—COOPER, Orn. Cal. 1, 1870, 408. _Picus mexicanus_,
AUD. Orn. Biog. V, 1839, 174, pl. ccccxvi.—IB. Birds America,
IV, 1842, 295, pl. cclxxiv.—SUNDEVALL, Consp. 72. _Colaptes
collaris_, VIGORS, Zoöl. Jour. IV, Jan. 1829, 353.—IB. Zoöl.
Beechey’s Voy. 1839, 24, pl. ix. _Picus rubricatus_, WAGLER,
Isis, 1829, V, May, 516. (“Lichtenstein Mus. Berol.”) _Colaptes
rubricatus_, BON. Pr. Zoöl. Soc. V, 1837, 108.—IB. List,
1838.—IB. Conspectus, 1850, 114. _? Picus cafer_, GMELIN,
Syst. Nat. I, 1788, 431.—LATH. Index Ornith. II, 1790, 242.
_? Picus lathami_, WAGLER, Syst. 1827, No. 85 (Cape of Good
Hope?).
SP. CHAR. Shafts and under surfaces of wing and tail feathers
orange-red. Male with a red patch on each side the cheek; nape without
red crescent; sometimes very faint indications laterally. Throat and
stripe beneath the eye bluish-ash. Back glossed with purplish-brown.
Female without the red cheek-patch. Length, about 13.00; wing, over
6.50.
[Illustration: _Colaptes mexicanus._]
ADDITIONAL CHARACTERS. Spots on the belly, a crescent on the breast,
and interrupted transverse bands on the back, black.
HAB. Western North America from Pacific to the Black Hills; north to
Sitka on the coast. Localities: Oaxaca (SCL. P. Z. S. 1858, 305); Vera
Cruz, alpine regions (SUMICHRAST, Mem. Bost. Soc. I, 1869. 562); San
Antonio, Texas (DRESSER, Ibis, 1865. 470); W. Arizona (COUES, P. A. N.
S. 1866, 56).
The female is similar in every way, perhaps a little smaller, but
lacks the red mustache. This is, however, indicated by a brown tinge
over an area corresponding with that of the red of the male.
In the present specimen (1,886) there is a slight indication of an
interrupted nuchal red band, as in the common Flicker, in some crimson
fibres to some of the feathers about as far behind the eye as this is
from the bill. A large proportion of males before us exhibit the same
characteristic, some more, some less, although it generally requires
careful examination for its detection. It may possibly be a
characteristic of the not fully mature bird, although it occurs in two
out of three male specimens.
There is a little variation in the size of the pectoral crescent and
spots; the latter are sometimes rounded or oblong cordate, instead of
circular. The bill varies as much as three or four tenths of an inch.
The rump, usually immaculate, sometimes has a few black streaks. The
extent of the red whisker varies a little. In skins from Oregon and
Washington the color of the back is as described; in those from
California and New Mexico it is of a grayer cast. There is little, if
any, variation in the shade of red in the whiskers and quill-feathers.
The head is washed on the forehead with rufous, passing into ashy on
the nape.
There is not only some difference in the size of this species, in the
same locality, but, as a general rule, the more southern specimens are
smaller.
This species is distinct from the _C. mexicanoides_ of Lafresnaye,
though somewhat resembling it. It is, however, a smaller bird; the red
of the cheeks is deeper; the whole upper part of the head and neck
uniform reddish-cinnamon without any ash, in marked contrast to that
on the sides of the head. The back is strongly glossed with
reddish-brown, and the black transverse bars are much more distinct,
closer and broader, three or four on each feather, instead of two
only. The rump and upper tail-coverts are closely barred, the centre
of the former only clearer white, but even here each feather has a
cordate spot of white. The spots on the flanks posteriorly exhibit a
tendency to become transverse bars.
Specimens from Mount Orizaba, Mexico, are very similar to those from
Oregon in color, presenting no appreciable difference. The size is,
however, much less, a male measuring 10.50, wing 6.00, tail 4.60
inches, instead of 12.75, 6.75, and 5.25 respectively. While, however,
the feet are smaller (tarsus 1.00 instead of 1.15), the bill is fully
as large, or even larger.
Most young birds of this species have a tinge of red on top of the
head, and frequently a decided nuchal crescent of red; but these are
only embryonic features, and disappear with maturity.
HABITS. This species, the counterpart in so many respects of the
Golden-winged Woodpecker, appears to take the place of that species
from the slopes of the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific, throughout
western North America. Dr. Woodhouse speaks of finding it abundant
along the banks of the Rio Grande. And in the fine collection
belonging to the Smithsonian Institution are specimens from the
Straits of Fuca, Fort Steilacoom, and Fort Vancouver, in Washington
Territory, from the Columbia River, from various points in California,
New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, Mexico, etc. Dr.
Gambel, in his Paper on the birds of California, first met with the
Red-shafted Woodpecker soon after leaving New Mexico, and it continued
to California, where he found it very abundant. He describes it as a
remarkably shy bird, and adds that he always saw it on the margins of
small creeks, where nothing grew larger than a willow-bush. Dr.
Heermann also found it abundant in California. Dr. Newberry, in his
Report on the zoölogy of Lieutenant Williamson’s expedition, speaks of
the Red-shafted Flicker as rather a common bird in all parts of
California and Oregon which his party visited. He describes many of
its habits as identical with those of the Golden Flicker (_C.
auratus_), but regards it as much the shyer bird. Dr. Cooper also
mentions the fact of the great abundance of this bird along the
western coast, equalling that of its closely allied cousin on the
eastern side of the Mississippi. It also resembles, he adds, that bird
so exactly in habits and notes that the description of one will apply
with exactness to the other. It is a constant resident in Washington
Territory, or at least west of the Cascade Mountains. He observed it
already burrowing out holes for its nests in April, at the Straits of
Fuca. About June 1 he found a nest containing seven young, nearly
fledged, which already showed in the male the distinguishing red
mustache. Dr. Suckley, in the same report, also says that it is
extremely common in the timbered districts of Washington Territory,
and adds that its habits, voice, calls, etc., are precisely similar to
those of the Yellow-Hammer of the Eastern States. Mr. Nuttall, as
quoted by Mr. Audubon, states that he first came upon this bird in the
narrow belt of forest which borders Laramie’s Fork of the Platte, and
adds that he scarcely lost sight of it from that time until he reached
the shores of the Pacific. Its manners, in all respects, are so
entirely similar to those of the common species that the same
description applies to both. He also regards it as the shyer bird of
the two, and less frequently seen on the ground. They burrow in the
oak and pine trees, and lay white eggs, after the manner of the whole
family, and these eggs are in no wise distinguishable from those of
the Golden-wing.
Dr. Cooper, in his Report upon the birds of California, refers to this
as a common species, and found in every part of the State except the
bare plains. It even frequents the low bushes, where no trees are to
be seen for miles. In the middle wooded districts, and towards the
north, it is much more abundant than elsewhere.
Their nesting-holes are at all heights from the ground, and are
usually about one foot in depth. In the southern part of the State
their eggs are laid in April, but farther north, at the Columbia, in
May.
Dr. Cooper attributes their shyness in certain localities to their
being hunted so much by the Indians for their bright feathers.
Generally he found them quite tame, so that their interesting habits
may be watched without difficulty. He regards them as an exact
counterpart of the eastern _auratus_, living largely on insects and
ants, which they collect without much trouble, and do not depend upon
hard work, like other Woodpeckers, for their food. During the season
they also feed largely on berries. Their curved bill is not well
adapted for hammering sound wood for insects, and they only dig into
decayed trees in search of their food. Like the eastern species, the
young of these birds, when their nest is approached, make a curious
hissing noise. They may be seen chasing each other round the trunk of
trees, as if in sport, uttering, at the same time, loud cries like
_whittoo, whittoo, whittoo_. Dr. Kennerly found these birds from the
Big Sandy to the Great Colorado, but they were so shy that he could
not obtain a specimen. They were seen on the barren hills among the
large cacti, in which they nest. Their extreme shyness was fully
explained afterwards by finding how closely they are hunted by the
Indians for the sake of their feathers, of which head-dresses are
made.
Mr. Dresser states that this bird is found as far east as San Antonio,
where, however, it is of uncommon occurrence. In December he noticed
several near the Nueces River, and in February and March obtained
others near Piedras Negras.
Dr. Coues gives it as abundant and resident in Arizona, where it is
found in all situations. Its tongue, he states, is capable of
protrusion to an extent far beyond that of any other North American
Woodpecker.
This bird, in some parts of California, is known as the Yellow-Hammer,
a name given in some parts of New England to the _Colaptes auratus_.
Mr. C. W. Plass, of Napa City, writes me that this Woodpecker “makes
himself too much at home with us to be agreeable. He drills large
holes though the weather-boards of the house, and shelters himself at
night between them and the inner wall. He does, not nest there, but
simply makes of such situations his winter home. We have had to shoot
them, for we find it is of no use to shut up one hole, as they will at
once make another by its side.”
Mr. J. A. Allen mentions finding this species, in the absence of
suitable trees on the Plains, making excavations in sand-banks.
According to Mr. Ridgway, the Red-shafted Flicker does not differ from
the Yellow-shafted species of the east in the slightest particular, as
regards habits, manners, and notes. It is, however, more shy than the
eastern species, probably from the fact that it is pursued by the
Indians, who prize its quill and tail-feathers as ornaments with which
to adorn their dress.
Their eggs are hardly distinguishable from those of the _auratus_, but
range of a very slightly superior size. They average 1.12 inches in
length by .89 of an inch in breadth. Their greatest length is 1.15
inches, their least 1.10, and their breadth ranges from .87 to .90.
Colaptes hybridus, BAIRD.
HYBRID FLICKER.
_Colaptes ayresii_, AUD. Birds Am. VII, 1843, 348, pl. ccccxciv.
_Colaptes hybridus_, BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858, 122. _Colaptes
mexicanus_, MAX. Cab. Jour. 1858, 422 (mixed with _mexicanus_).
_Picas hybridus aurato-mexicanus_, SUNDEVALL, Consp. Pic. 1866,
721.
SP. CHAR. Yellow shafts or feathers on wing and tail combined with
red, or red spotted cheek-patches. Orange-red shafts combined with a
well-defined nuchal red crescent, and pinkish throat. Ash-colored
throat combined with black cheek-patch or yellow shafts. Shafts and
feathers intermediate between gamboge-yellow and dark orange-red.
HAB. Upper Missouri and Yellowstone; Black Hills.
[Illustration: PLATE LV.
1. Colaptes auratus. ♂ 2122.
2. ” ” ♀.
3. ” mexicanus. ♂.
4. ” ” ♀.]
The general distribution of _Colaptes mexicanus_, as already
indicated, is from the Pacific coast of the United States, eastward to
the Black Hills and the Upper Missouri and Yellowstone; that of the
_C. auratus_ from the Atlantic Coast to about the eastern limits of
_mexicanus_. But little variation is seen in the two species up to the
region mentioned; slight differences in shade of color, size, and
frequency of spots, etc., being all. Where they come together,
however, or overlap, a most remarkable race is seen, in which no two
specimens, nay, scarcely the two sides of the same bird, are alike,
the characters of the two species becoming mixed up in the most
extraordinary manner. Thus, the shafts show every shade from
orange-red to pure yellow; yellow shafts combine with red cheek-patch
(as in _C. ayresii_ of Audubon); a red nape, with orange-red shafts;
cheek-patches red with black feathers intermixed, or _vice versa_;
perhaps the feathers red at base and black at tip, or black at base
and red at tip, etc. As the subject has been presented in sufficient
detail in the Birds of North America, as quoted above, it need not be
repeated here, except to say that collections received since 1858 only
substantiate what has there been stated.
To the race thus noted, the name _hybridus_ was given, not as of a
variety, since it is not entitled to this rank, but as of a
heterogeneous mixture, caused by the breeding together of two
different species, and requiring some appellation. Whether the
presumed hybrids are fertile, and breed with each other or with
full-blooded parents, has not yet been ascertained; perhaps not, since
the area in which they occur is limited, and it is only occasionally
that individuals of the kind referred to have been found beyond the
bounds mentioned. It is very rarely, however, that pure breeds occur
in the district of _hybridus_, a taint being generally appreciable in
all.
The conditions in the present instance appear different from those
adverted to under the head of _Picus villosus_, where the question is
not one of hybridism between two strongly marked and distinct species,
but of the gradual change, between the Atlantic and the Pacific, from
one pattern of coloration to another.
Colaptes chrysoides, MALH.
THE CAPE FLICKER.
_Geopicus chrysoides_, MALH. Rev. et Mag. Zoöl. IV, 1852, 553.—IB.
Mon. Pic. II, 261, tab. 109. _Colaptes chrysoides_, BAIRD,
Birds N. Am. 1858, 125.—ELLIOT, Ill. Birds N. Am. VI,
plate.—COOPER, Pr. Cal. Ac. 1861, 122 (Fort Mohave).—COUES,
Pr. A. N. Sc. 1866, 56 (Arizona).—SCL. Cat. 1862,
344.—ELLIOT, Illust. Am. B. I, pl. xxvi.—_Cooper_, Orn. Cal.
I, 1870, 410. _Picus chrysoides_, SUNDEVALL, Consp. 72.
SP. CHAR. Markings generally as in other species. Top of head
rufous-brown; chin, throat, and sides of head ash-gray. Shafts of
quills and tail-feathers, with their under surfaces in great part,
gamboge-yellow; no nuchal red. Malar patch of male red; wanting in the
female. Length, 11.50; wing, 5.75; tail, 4.50.
HAB. Colorado and Gila River, north to Fort Mohave, south to Cape St.
Lucas. Localities: Fort Mohave (COOPER, Pr. Cal. Ac. 1861, 122); W.
Arizona (COUES, P. A. N. S. 1866, 56).
This interesting species is intermediate between _auratus_ and
_mexicanus_ in having the yellow shafts and quills of the former; a
red malar patch, an ashy throat, and no nuchal crescent, as in the
latter. To _mexicanoides_ the relationship is still closer, since both
have the rufous-brown head above. A hybrid between this last species
and _auratus_ would in some varieties come very near _chrysoides_, but
as it does not belong to the region of _chrysoides_, and there is no
transition from one species to the other in any specimens, as in
_hybridus_, there is no occasion to take this view of the species.
Cape St. Lucas specimens, where the species is exceedingly abundant,
are considerably smaller than those from Arizona, and appear to be
more strongly marked with black above and below; otherwise there seems
to be no difference of special importance.
As neither _C. auratus_ nor _mexicanus_ has the top of the head
rufous-brown, (though slightly indicated anteriorly in the latter),
this character has not been noted in the hybrids between the two
(_hybridus_), and its presence in _chrysoides_ will serve to
distinguish it from _hybridus_.
HABITS. This comparatively new form of Woodpecker was first described
in 1852 by Malherbe, from a California specimen in the Paris Museum,
which had been at first supposed to be a female or immature _ayresii_.
What Dr. Cooper thinks may have been this species was met with by Dr.
Heermann among the mountains bordering upon the Cosumnes River, in
California, where it was rare, and only two specimens were taken. In
February, 1861, other specimens of this bird were taken at Fort Mohave
by Dr. Cooper. They were feeding on larvæ and insects among the
poplar-trees, and were very shy and wary. The bird is supposed to
winter in the Colorado Valley, and wherever found has been met with in
valleys, and not on mountains. It is an abundant and characteristic
member of the Cape St. Lucas fauna.
According to Dr. Cooper these birds were already mated at Fort Mohave
after February 20. They had the same habits, flight, and cries as the
_C. mexicanus_. They appeared to be migratory, having come from the
south.
Mr. Xantus, in his brief notes on the birds of Cape St. Lucas, makes
mention of finding this bird breeding, May 19, in a dead _Cereus
giganteus_. The nest was a large cavity about fifteen feet from the
ground, and contained only one egg. The parent bird was also secured.
In another instance two eggs were found in a _Cereus giganteus_, at
the distance of forty feet from the ground. The eggs were not
noticeably different from those of the common _Colaptes mexicanus_.
FAMILY PSITTACIDÆ.—THE PARROTS.
CHAR. Bill greatly hooked; the maxilla movable and with a cere at the
base. Nostrils in the base of the bill. Feet scansorial, covered with
granulated scales.
The above diagnosis characterizes briefly a family of the
_Zygodactyli_ having representatives throughout the greater part of
the world, except Europe, and embracing about three hundred and fifty
species, according to the late enumeration of Finsch,[136] of which
one hundred and forty-two, or nearly one half, are American (seventy
Brazilian alone). The subfamilies are as follows:—
I. Stringopinæ. Appearance owl-like; face somewhat veiled
or with a facial disk, as in the Owls.
II. Plyctolophinæ. Head with an erectile crest, of
variable shape.
III. Sittacinæ. Head plain. Tail long, or lengthened,
wedge-shaped or graduated.
IV. Psittacinæ. Head plain. Tail short or moderate,
straight or rounded.
V. Trichoglossinæ. Tip of tongue papillose. Bill
compressed; tip of maxilla internally smooth, not crenate;
gonys obliquely ascending.
Of these, Nos. III and IV alone are represented in the New World, and
only the _Sittacinæ_ occur in the United States, with one species.
[136] Die Papageien. Monographisch bearbeitet von Otto
Finsch. 2 vols. Leiden, 1867, 1868.
SUBFAMILY SITTACINÆ.
The lengthened cuneate tail, as already stated, distinguishes
this group from the American _Psittacinæ_ with short, square, or
rounded tail. The genera are distinguished as follows:—
Sittace. Culmen flattened. Face naked, except in _S.
pachyrhyncha_. Tail as long as or longer than wings.
Conurus. Culmen rounded. Face entirely feathered, except a
curve around the eye. Tail shorter than wings.
Of the genus _Sittace_, which embraces eighteen species, two come
sufficiently near to the southern borders of the United States to
render it not impossible that they may yet be found to cross the
border. Of one of these, indeed, (_S. pachyrhyncha_,) there is a
specimen in the Museum of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural
Sciences, presented by J. W. Audubon as shot on the Rio Grande of
Texas; and another (_S. militaris_) is common at Mazatlan, and perhaps
even at Guaymas. There is considerable reason for doubt as to the
authenticity of the alleged locality of the _S. pachyrhyncha_, but for
the purpose of identification, should either species present itself,
we give diagnoses in the accompanying foot-note.[137]
[137]
A. Tail longer than the wings; lores and cheeks naked; the
latter with narrow lines of small feathers.
S. militaris. Green; forehead red; posterior portion of
back, upper and under tail-coverts with quills and tip of
tail, sky-blue; under side of tail dirty orange-yellow.
Wing, 14.00; middle tail-feathers, 15.00; tarsus, 1.08.
_Hab._ Northwestern Mexico to Bolivia.
Synonymy: _Psittacus militaris_, LINN. S. N. 1767, 139.
_Sittace militaris_, FINSCH, Die Papageien, I, 1867,
396.
B. Tail about equal to the wings; lores and cheeks
feathered.
S. pachyrhyncha. Green; the forehead, edge of wings, and
the tibiæ red; greater under wing-coverts yellow. Wing,
8.00 to 10.00; middle tail-feather, 6.50. _Hab._ Southern
Mexico (Jalapa and Angangueo), given probably erroneously
from the Rio Grande of Texas. Synonymy: _Macrocercus
pachyrhynchus_, SW. Syn. Birds Mex. in Philos. Mag. I,
1827, 439, No. 79. _Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha_, BON.
Tableau des Perroquets, Rev. et Mag. de Zoöl. 1854, 149.
_Sittace pachyrhyncha_, FINSCH, Die Papageien, I, 1867,
428. _Psittacus pascha_, WAGLER, Isis, 1831, 524.
_Psittacus strenuus_, LICHT. Preis-Verzeichiss, 1830.
GENUS CONURUS, KUHL.
_Conurus_, KUHL, Consp. Psittac. 4, 1830.—IB. Nova Acta K. L.
C. Acad. X, 1830.
GEN. CHAR. Tail long, conical, and pointed; bill stout; cheeks
feathered, but in some species leaving a naked ring round the eye;
cere feathered to the base of the bill.