knowledge that the music contained the statutory notice reserving
performing rights is not of itself sufficient evidence that the
proprietor knew the performance to be unauthorised. _Moul_ v.
_Coronet_, Nov. 30, 1901.
[777] Not a true "penalty," but in the nature of liquidated damages,
_Adams_ v. _Batley_ (1887), 18 Q. B. D., 625; _Saunders_ v. _Will_
[1892], 2 Q. B., 18; see _Fitzbull_ v. _Brooke_ (1844), 2 D. and L.,
477.
[778] See p. 86.
[779] 3 & 4 Will. IV. c. 15, sec. 2, provided "double costs of
suit." This was amended by 5 & 6 Vict. c. 97, sec. 2, to a "full and
reasonable indemnity as to all costs, charges, and expenses." This
probably means nothing more than ordinary party and party costs,
_Reeve_ v. _Gibson_ [1891], 1 Q. B., 652; _Avery_ v. _Wood_ [1891],
3 Ch., 115; but it would seem that as the costs are given by statute
they are not in the discretion of the Court, and must be awarded to
a successful plaintiff, _Reeve_ v. _Gibson_ [1891], 1 Q. B., 652;
_Hasker_ v. _Wood_ [1885], 54 L. J. Q. B., 419; Judicature Act,
1890, sec. 5. Sec. 2 of 5 & 6 Vict. c. 97 is repealed by the Public
Authorities Protection Act in so far as that Act applies.
[780] 3 & 4 Will. IV. c. 15, sec. 3.
[781] 51 & 52 Vict. c. 17, sec. 1; and see p. 86 as to mode of
assessing.
[782] See p. 86.
[783] 51 & 52 Vict. c. 17, sec. 2; 3 & 4 Will. IV. c. 15, sec. 2; 5 &
6 Vict. c. 96, sec. 2.
[784] 3 & 4 Will. IV. c. 15, sec. 3.
[785] See _infra_.
[786] See p. 150. This is doubtful.
[787] See p. 150.
[788] See p. 151.
[789] See p. 152.
[790] See p. 152.
[791] See chapter on Colonial Copyright, p. 186.
[792] 2 Atk., 93.
[793] Amb., 264.
[794] 15 & 16 Vict. c. 12, sec. 14.
[795] _Per_ Best, C. J., in _Newton_ v. _Cowie_ (1827), 4 Bing., at p.
246.
[796] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 1.
[797] _Stannard_ v. _Lee_ (1871), L. R., 6 Ch., 346; 24 L. T. (N. S.),
459.
[798] 24 L. T. (N. S.), at p. 460.
[799] 19 W. R., at p. 617.
[800] (1871), 24 L. T. (N. S.), 570.
[801] (1871), L. R., 6 Ch., 346.
[802] _Bogue_ v. _Houlston_ (1852), 5 De G. and Sm., 267; _Maple_ v.
_Junior Army and Navy Stores_ (1882), 21 Ch. D., 369; _Comyns_ v.
_Hyde_ (1895), 43 W. R., 266; _Hildesheimer_ v. _Dunn_ (1891), 64 L.
T. (N. S.), 452.
[803] _Page_ v. _Townsend_ (1832), 5 Sim., 395.
[804] Ibid.
[805] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 8 (1); and see 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec.
19.
[806] 7 Geo. II. c. 38.
[807] See p. 36.
[808] See p. 169.
[809] 6 & 7 Will. IV. c. 59, sec. 2; _Page_ v. _Townsend_ (1832), 5
Sim., 395.
[810] 7 Vict. c. 12, sec. 19; 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 8 (1).
[811] 8 Geo. II. c. 13.
[812] _Newton_ v. _Cowie_ (1827), 4 Bing., 234; _Brooks_ v. _Cock_
(1835), 3 Ad. and E., 138.
[813] _Thompson_ v. _Symonds_ (1792), 5 T. R., 41; _Harrison_ v.
_Hogg_ (1794), 2 Ves., 322; _Newton_ v. _Cowie_ (1827), 4 Bing., 234;
_Brooks_ v. _Cock_ (1835), 3 Ad. and E., 138; _Mackmurdo_ v. _Smith_
(1798), 7 T. R., 518.
[814] _Blackwell_ v. _Harper_ (1740), 2 Atk., 93; and see _Roworth_ v.
_Wilkes_ (1807), 1 Camp., 94.
[815] (1792), 5 T. R., 41.
[816] _Blackwell_ v. _Harper_ (1740), 2 Atk., 93; _Graves_ v.
_Ashford_ (1867), L. R., 2 C. P., 410.
[817] _Newton_ v. _Cowie_ (1827), 4 Bing., 234; _Thompson_ v.
_Symonds_ (1792), 5 T. R., 41.
[818] Ibid.
[819] _Rock_ v. _Lazarus_ (1872), L. R., 15 Eq., 104.
[820] _Graves_ v. _Ashford_ (1867), L. R., 2 C. P., 410.
[821] _Baschet_ v. _London Illustrated Standard_ [1900], 1 Ch., 73;
_Fores_ v. _Johnes_ (1802), 4 Esp., 97.
[822] 7 Geo. III. c. 38, sec. 7.
[823] _Donaldson_ v. _Beckett_ (1774), 2 Bro. P. C., 129.
[824] _Prince Albert_ v. _Strange_ (1849), 1 M'N. and G., 25; _West_
v. _Francis_ (1822), 5 B. and Ald., 737.
[825] 8 Geo. II. c. 13; 7 Geo. III. c. 38.
[826] _Stannard_ v. _Harrison_ (1871), 24 L. T. (N. S.), 570.
[827] See as to books, p. 73.
[828] _Thompson_ v. _Symonds_ (1792), 5 T. R., 41.
[829] 8 Geo. II. c. 13; 17 Geo. III. c. 57.
[830] _Thompson_ v. _Symonds_ (1792), 5 T. R., 41.
[831] 8 Geo. II. c. 13; 17 Geo. III. c. 57.
[832] See Assignment of Books, p. 77.
[833] Cf. _Cooper_ v. _Stephens_ [1895], 1 Ch., 567, a decision under
the Copyright Act, 1842.
[834] _Marshall_ v. _Petty_ (1900), 17 T. L. R., 501; 8 Geo. II. c.
13, sec. 2.
[835] See as to books, p. 74.
[836] 8 Geo. II. c. 13; 17 Geo. III. c. 57. The above summary is the
result of a careful comparison of these two Acts. As Sir James Stephen
says in his "Digest": "They are inexpressibly puzzling and very
cumbrous.... The sense escapes in a cloud of words." It is submitted,
however, that there are more important distinctions between the two
Acts than those noticed in the "Digest," and the above is an attempt
to make them as clear as possible.
[837] 8 Geo. II. c. 13.
[838] Ibid.
[839] 17 Geo. III. c. 57.
[840] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, secs. 8 and 9.
[841] Ibid.
[842] 17 Geo. III. c. 57.
[843] 17 Geo. III. c. 57; but see _Martin_ v. _Wright_ (1833), 6 Sim.,
297, contra.
[844] 17 Geo. III. c. 57.
[845] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, secs. 8 and 9.
[846] Ibid.
[847] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 8.
[848] _Gambart_ v. _Sumner_ (1859), 8 W. R., 27; 5 H. and N., 5;
_West_ v. _Francis_ (1822), 5 B. and Ald., 737.
[849] 8 Geo. II. c. 13.
[850] 7 Geo. III. c. 38.
[851] _Graves_ v. _Mercer_ (1868), 16 W. R., 790.
[852] 8 Geo. II. c. 13; 7 Geo. III. c. 38.
[853] _Avery_ v. _Wood_ [1891], 3 Ch., 115.
[854] _Hasker_ v. _Wood_ (1885), 54 L. J., Q. B., 419; _Reeve_ v.
_Gibson_ [1891], 1 Q. B., 652.
[855] But see _Martin_ v. _Wright_ (1833), 6 Sim., 297.
[856] 8 Geo. II. c. 13.
[857] 8 Geo. II. c. 13; 17 Geo. III. c. 57.
[858] _West_ v. _Francis_ (1822), 5 B. and Ald., 737; _Moore_ v.
_Clarke_ (1842), 9 M. and W., 692.
[859] _West_ v. _Francis_ (1822), 5 B. and Ald., 737.
[860] _Graves_ v. _Ashford_ (1867), L. R., 2 C. P., 410; _Gambart_ v.
_Ball_ (1863), 14 C. B. (N. S.), 306.
[861] _Dicks_ v. _Brooks_ (1880), 15 Ch. D., 22; _Gambart_ v. _Ball_
(1863), 14 C. B. (N. S.), 306.
[862] _Newton_ v. _Cowie_ (1827), 4 Bing. at p. 246; _De Berenger_ v.
_Wheble_ (1819), 2 Stark., 548.
[863] _Dicks_ v. _Brooks_ (1880), 15 Ch. D., 22; _Gambart_ v. _Ball_
(1863), 14 C. B. (N. S.), 306.
[864] (1807), 1 Camp., at p. 98.
[865] (1833), 6 Sim., 297.
[866] No such statement could now be accepted as sound. See p. 112.
[867] (1880), 15 Ch. D., 22.
[868] 15 Ch. D., at p. 34.
[869] 15 Ch. D., at p. 37.
[870] See as to literary copyright, p. 112.
[871] _Murray_ v. _Heath_ (1831), 1 B. and Ad., 804.
[872] 8 Geo. II. c. 13; 17 Geo. III. c. 57.
[873] 8 Geo. II. c. 13.
[874] Cf. _Cooper_ v. _Stephens_ [1895], 1 Ch., 567, which is under 5
& 6 Vict. c. 45, but on a claim for damages an injunction only would
seem to be analogous; _Marshall_ v. _Petty_ (1900), 17 T. L. R., 501.
[875] See _infra_.
[876] See p. 162.
[877] See p. 162. This is doubtful.
[878] See p. 162.
[879] See p. 163.
[880] See p. 163.
[881] See chapter on Colonial Copyright, p. 186.
[882] 54 Geo. III. c. 56, sec. 1.
[883] _Caproni_ v. _Alberti_ (1892), 40 W. R., 235.
[884] _Britain_ v. _Hanks_, Wright, J., April 15, 1902.
[885] 54 Geo. III. c. 56, sec. 1.
[886] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 8 (1).
[887] 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec. 19.
[888] 10 Ir. R. Ch., at p. 516, per Brady, L. Ch. I.
[889] _Turner_ v. _Robinson_ (1860), 10 Ir. R. Ch., 121, 510.
[890] See _supra_, p. 42.
[891] 54 Geo. III. c. 56.
[892] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45.
[893] 54 Geo. III. c. 56, sec. 1.
[894] As to work done by partner of a firm, see _Britain_ v. _Hanks_,
April 15, 1902.
[895] See p. 151.
[896] 38 Geo. III. c. 71.
[897] Viz., 38 Geo. III. c. 71, and 54 Geo. III. c. 56.
[898] _Britain_ v. _Hanks_, April 15, 1902.
[899] See p. 46.
[900] See p. 174.
[901] See p. 152.
[902] 54 Geo. III. c. 56, secs. 1 and 2.
[903] Ibid.
[904] 54 Geo. III. c. 56, sec. 6; cf. _Carnan_ v. _Bowles_ (1786), 2
Bro. C. C., 8o; _Rundell_ v. _Murray_ (1821), Jac., 311.
[905] 54 Geo. III. c. 56, sec. 4; cf. 8 Anne c. 19, sec. 1, and
_Davidson_ v. _Bohn_ (1848), 6 C. B., 456; _Power_ v. _Walker_ (1814),
3 M. and S., 7; _Jefferys_ v. _Boosey_ (1854), 4 H. L. Cas., 815.
[906] 54 Geo. III. c. 56, sec. 4.
[907] Ibid.
[908] The Sculpture Act gives "double costs," but 5 & 6 Vict. c. 97,
sec. 2, substitutes "a full and reasonable indemnity." See p. 144,
_note_ 4. This probably means costs in the ordinary sense; but the
plaintiff is entitled to them as of right and not as a matter of
discretion under the Rules of the Supreme Court.
[909] 54 Geo. III. c. 56, sec. 3.
[910] See _infra_.
[911] See p. 168.
[912] See p. 170.
[913] See p. 171.
[914] See p. 174.
[915] See p. 174.
[916] See chapter on Colonial Copyright, p. 186.
[917] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 1.
[918] _Hanfstaengl_ v. _Empire Palace_ [1894], 2 Ch., 1.
[919] _Graves'_ case (1869), L. R., 4 Q. B., 715.
[920] See the cases as to new editions of books.
[921] _Kenrick_ v. _Lawrence_ (1890), 25 Q. B. D., 99.
[922] _Farina_ v. _Silverlock_ (1858), 4 K. and J., 650. This case is
hardly an authority, as it was decided when published paintings and
drawings were unprotected; but it is submitted that even under the Act
of 1862 a label of this kind would not be protected.
[923] (1860), 10 Ir. Ch., 121, 510.
[924] (1860), 10 Ir. Ch., 121.
[925] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 1; see _Geissendorfer_ v.
_Mendelssohn_ (1896), 13 T. L. R., 91.
[926] See _Nottage_ v. _Jackson_ (1883), 11 Q. B. D., 627.
[927] _Petty_ v. _Taylor_ [1897], 1 Ch., 465.
[928] Ibid.
[929] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 4.
[930] _Tuck & Sons_ v. _Priester_ (1887), 19 Q. B. D., 629; _Pollard_
v. _Photo. Co._ (1888), 40 Ch. D., 345.
[931] _Turner_ v. _Robinson_ (1860), 10 Ir. Ch., 121, 510; _Prince
Albert_ v. _Strange_ (1849), 1 M'N. and G., at p. 42; _West_ v.
_Francis_ (1822), 5 B. and Ald., 737.
[932] _Tuck & Sons_ v. _Priester_ (1887), 19 Q. B. D., 629; _Tuck_ v.
_Continental_ (1887), 3 T. L. R., 826.
[933] Ibid.
[934] _London Printing_ v. _Cox_ [1891], 3 Ch., 291; _Dupuy_ v.
_Dilkes_ (1879), W. N., 145; 48 L. J. Ch., 682.
[935] _London Printing_ v. _Cox_ [1891], 3 Ch., 291.
[936] _Dupuy_ v. _Dilkes_ (1879), W. N., 145; 48 L. J. Ch., 682.
[937] _Graves'_ case (1869), L. R., 4 Q. B., 715.
[938] _Ex parte Walker_ (1869), 17 W. R., 1018; 10 B. and S., 680.
[939] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 4.
[940] _Ex parte Beal_ (1868), L. R., 3 Q. B., 387; 9 B. and G., 395.
[941] Blackburn, J., 9 B. and S., at p. 398. The headnote in _ex parte
Walker_ (1869), 10 B. and S., 680, "That the description 'A Piper and
a Pair of Nut-crackers' was sufficient for the purpose of sec. 6," is
erroneous, the point being left undecided.
[942] _Baschet_ v. _London Illustrated Standard_ [1900], 1 Ch., 73;
_Fores_ v. _Johnes_ (1802), 4 Esp., 97; see _Du Bost_ v. _Beresford_
(1810), 2 Camp., 511.
[943] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 1.
[944] Ibid.
[945] 7 Vict. c. 12, sec. 19.
[946] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 1.
[947] _Nottage_ v. _Jackson_ (1883), 11 Q. B. D., 627; _Wooderson_ v.
_Tuck_ (1887), 4. T. L. R., 57; _Melville_ v. _Mirror of Life_ [1895],
2 Ch., 531; _Kenrick_ v. _Lawrence_ [1890], 25 Q. B. D., 99.
[948] _Nottage_ v. _Jackson_ (1883), 11 Q. B. D., 627; _Kenrick_ v.
_Lawrence_ [1890], 25 Q. B. D., 99.
[949] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 1; _Kenrick_ v. _Lawrence_ (1890), 25
Q. B. D., 99; _Levi_ v. _Champion_ (1887), 3 T. L. R., 286.
[950] _Wooderson_ v. _Tuck_ (1887), 4 T. L. R., 57.
[951] _Melville_ v. _Mirror of Life_ [1895], 2 Ch., 531; _Ellis_ v.
_Marshall_ (1895), 11 T. L. R., 522; _Ellis_ v. _Ogden_(1894), 11 T.
L. R., 50.
[952] _Melville_ v. _Mirror of Life_ [1895] 2 Ch., 531; _Ellis_ v.
_Marshall_ (1895), 11 T. L. R., 522.
[953] _Ellis_ v. _Ogden_ (1894), 11 T. L. R., 50.
[954] _Melville_ v. _Mirror of Life_ [1895], 2 Ch., 531; _Ellis_ v.
_Ogden_ (1894), 11 T. L. R., 50.
[955] _Petty_ v. _Taylor_ [1897], 1 Ch., 465.
[956] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 3.
[957] _Troitzsch_ v. _Rees_ (1887), 3 T. L. R., 773; and see _Graves'_
case (1869), L. R., 4 Q. B., 715.
[958] See p. 172 as to registration.
[959] _London Printing and Publishing Alliance_ v. _Cox_ [1891], 3
Ch., 291.
[960] See assignment of literary copyright, p. 78.
[961] See as to partial assignment of literary copyright, p. 80.
[962] (1880), 13 Ch. D., 872.
[963] _Tuck_ v. _Canton_ (1882), 51 L. J., Q. B., 363.
[964] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 2.
[965] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 6.
[966] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, secs. 6, 8, 9, 11.
[967] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 6. These penalties are not a civil
debt, but in the nature of a fine for a criminal offence; _ex parte
Graves_ (1868), L. R., 3 Ch., 642.
[968] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 6.
[969] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 9.
[970] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 11.
[971] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 9.
[972] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 8.
[973] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 11.
[974] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 9.
[975] Ibid.
[976] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 10.
[977] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 11.
[978] (1898), 14 T. L. R.
[979] [1900], 1 Ch., 73.
[980] _Tuck_ v. _Priester_ (1887), 14 Q. B. D., 629.
[981] Ibid.
[982] Ibid.
[983] _Ex parte Beal_ (1868), L. R., 3 Q. B., 387; _Hildesheimer_ v.
_Faulkner_ [1901], 2 Ch., 552.
[984] (1868), 9 B. and S., 395.
[985] 9 B. and S., at p. 402.
[986] _Ellis_ v. _Marshall_ (1895),64 L. J., Q. B., 757; _Baschet_ v.
_London Illustrated_ [1900], 1 Ch., 73; _Nicholls_ v. _Parker_ (1901),
17 T. L. R., 482; _Green_ v. _Irish Independent_ [1899], 1 I. R., 386.
[987] [1901], 2 Ch., 552.
[988] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 6.
[989] _Tuck_ v. _Priester_ (1887), 19 Q. B. D., 629; _Murray_ v.
_Heath_ (1831), 1 B. and Ad., 804; _Mayall_ v. _Higbey_ (1862), 1 H.
and C, 148.
[990] _Pollard_ v. _Photo. Co._ (1888), 4 Ch. D., 345.
[991] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 7.
[992] This offence does not constitute forgery, because a forgery
must be a document, and a picture is not a document; _Reg_ v. _Closs_
(1857), 6 W. R., 109.
[993] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 7.
[994] 16 Jac. 1., c. 16, sec. 3.
[995] _Lucas_ v. _Williams_ [1892], 2 Q. B., 113.
[996] 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, sec. 2.
[997] _Ex parte Beal_ (1868), 3 Q. B., 387.
[998] _Bolton_ v. _Aldin_ (1895), 65 L. J., Q. B., 120.
[999] But see _Hanfstaengl_ v. _Baines_ [1895], A. C., 20;
_Hanfstaengl_ v. _Empire Palace_ [1894], 2 Ch., 1; [1894], 3 Ch., 109.
[1000] _Graves'_ case (1869), L. R., 4 Q. B., 715; cf. the case of
the photograph of an engraving, _Gambart_ v. _Ball_ (1863), 14 C. B.
(N. S.), 306; _Graves_ v. _Ashford_ (1867), L. R., 2 C. P., 410.
[1001] [1894], 2 Ch. 1.
[1002] [1895], A. C., 20.
[1003] (1896), 12 T. L. R., 491.
[1004] (1842), 9 M. & W., 692.
[1005] (1897), 45 W. R., 476; see also _West_ v. _Francis_ (1822), 5
B. and Ald., 737; _London Stereo_ v. _Kelly_ (1888), 5 T. L. R., 169;
_Bolton_ v. _London Exhibitions_ (1898), 14 T. L. R., 550.
[1006] _Hanfstaengl_ v. _Baines_ [1895], A. C., 20; _ex parte Beal_
(1868), L. R., 3 Q. B., 387; _Turner_ v. _Robinson_ (1860), 10 Ir.
Ch., 121, 510.
[1007] _Ex parte Beal_ (1868), L. R., 3 Q. B., 387.
[1008] _Brooks_ v. _Religious Tract Society_ (1897), 45 W. R., 476;
_West_ v. _Francis_ (1822), 5 B. and Ald., 737.
[1009] _Hanfstaengl_ v. _Empire Palace_ [1894], 3 Ch., 109.
[1010] 25 & 26 Vict., sec. 3.
[1011] 25 & 26 Vict., sec. 6.
[1012] _London Printing and Pub. All._ v. _Cox_ [1891], 3 Ch., 291.
[1013] _Nicholls_ v. _Parker_ (1901), 17 T. L. R., 482; and see
_Guggenheim_ v. _Leng_ (1896), 12 T. L. R., 491.
[1014] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 8 (4).
[1015] The following colonies have local legislation: India, Ceylon,
Canada, the Australian Colonies, New Zealand, Cape of Good Hope,
Natal, Hong Kong, Tasmania, Newfoundland.
[1016] Australian Colonies, Tasmania, Cape of Good Hope, Natal, New
Zealand, Hong Kong, Ceylon. The period of protection in foreign
telegrams varies from 24 to 120 hours in the respective colonies.
[1017] 10 & 11 Vict. c. 95, usually known as the Foreign Reprints Act.
[1018] The following are the colonies now under the provisions of
the Foreign Reprints Act, 1847. The dates are of the respective
Orders in Council. Bermuda, February 13, 1849; Bahamas, May 21, 1849;
Newfoundland, July 30, 1849; St. Christopher, November 6, 1849;
Antigua, June 19, 1850; St. Lucia, November 13, 1850; British Guiana,
October 23, 1851; Mauritius, April 1, 1853; Grenada, December 29,
1853; Nevis, March 10, 1855; Cape of Good Hope, March 10, 1855; Natal,
May 16, 1857; Jamaica, April 23, 1859; Trinidad, March 17, 1875;
Barbados, August 15, 1890; St. Vincent, August 26, 1881.
[1019] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 8.
[1020] The following colonies have provided a system of registration:
Canada, New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia, Queensland,
South Australia, Natal, Cape of Good Hope.
[1021] Printed as a schedule to 38 & 39 Vict. c. 53.
[1022] 39 & 40 Vict. c. 36, sec. 152.
[1023] 38 & 39 Vict. c. 53.
[1024] 10 & 11 Vict. c. 95.
[1025] 57 & 58 Vict. (Canada), c. 33.
[1026] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 17.
[1027] _Morang_ v. _Publishers_ (1900), 32 Ont. Rep., 393.
[1028] 63 & 64 Vict. (Canada), c. 25, known as the Fisher Act.
[1029] (1876), 1 Tupp. App. Rep., 436.
[1030] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 17; 39 & 40 Vict. c. 36, sec. 152.
[1031] 38 & 39 Vict. c. 53, sec. 4.
[1032] The type need not be set in Canada; _Frowde_ v. _Parish_
(1896), 27 Ont. Rep., 526.
[1033] 38 & 39 Vict. c. 53, schedule, sec. 15.
[1034] _Anglo-Canadian_ v. _Suckling_ (1889), 17 Ont. Rep., 239.
[1035] 63 & 64 Vict. (Canada), c. 25.
[1036] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 17.
[1037] See p. 146, _supra_.
[1038] See p. 167, _supra_.
[1039] See p. 161, _supra_.
[1040] _Graves_ v. _Gorrie_ (1900), 32 Ont. Rep., 266.
[1041] See p. 194, _infra_.
[1042] _Morocco Bound Syndicate_ v. _Harris_ [1895], 1 Ch., 534.
[1043] 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec. 19; _Boucicault_ v. _Delafield_ (1863),
1 H. and M., 597.
[1044] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 11.
[1045] See p. 129.
[1046] Berne Convention, Arts. 2, 14; 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 2 (3);
Order in Council, Nov. 28, 1887, sec. 3.
[1047] _Hanfstaengl_ v. _Empire Palace_ [1894], 3 Ch., 109.
[1048] Additional Act of Paris, Art. I. 1; Berne Convention, Art. 13.
[1049] _Hanfstaengl_ v. _Empire Palace_, _ubi supra._
[1050] Additional Act of Paris, Art. I. 1.
[1051] Berne Convention, Art. 13.
[1052] Additional Act of Paris, I. 1.
[1053] Berne Convention, Art. 6; 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 5 (3).
[1054] Additional Act of Paris, II. 1.
[1055] _i. e._ works delineating the steps in a dance or ballet. Berne
Convention, Final Protocol (2).
[1056] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 6.
[1057] See also Berne Convention, Final Protocol (4); Order in
Council, Nov. 28, 1887, sec. 3; Additional Act of Paris, Art. II. 2.
[1058] _Lauri_ v. _Renad_ [1892], 3 Ch., 402.
[1059] _Hanfstaengl_ v. _Holloway_ [1893], 2 Q. B., 1.
[1060] [1892], 3 Ch., 402.
[1061] Berne Convention, Art. 2; 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 2 (3).
[1062] 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec. 6; 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 4; Order
in Council, Nov. 28, 1887; _Hanfstaengl_ v. _American Tobacco Co._
[1895], 1 Q. B., 347.
[1063] Berne Convention, Art. 9.
[1064] 8 Geo. II. c. 13.
[1065] 54 Geo. III. c. 56.
[1066] 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec. 6.
[1067] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 4.
[1068] November 28, 1887.
[1069] [1891], 2 Ch., 371.
[1070] 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec. 6.
[1071] Berne Convention, Art. 1.
[1072] 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, secs. 3, 4, 5.
[1073] [1893], 2 Q. B., 1.
[1074] [1895], 1 Q. B., 347.
[1075] [1891], 2 Ch., 371.
[1076] [1895], 1 Q. B., 347.
[1077] [1891], 2 Ch., 371.
[1078] (1854), 10 Ex., 203; and see _Cassell_ v. _Stiff_ (1856), 2 K.
and J., 279.
[1079] Scrutton on "Copyright," 3rd ed., p. 213.
[1080] Additional Act of Paris, 1896, Art. II.
[1081] Berne Convention, Art. 11.
[1082] Ibid.
[1083] 49 & 50 Vict. sec. 7.
[1084] Additional Act of Paris, Art. I. 1; Order in Council, November
28, 1887, sec. 3; 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, secs, 2, 3, 4; 49 & 50 Vict. c.
33, sec. 9.
[1085] Berne Convention, Art. 2; Order in Council, November 28, 1887,
sec. 3; 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 2 (3).
[1086] See also Revenue Act, 1887.
[1087] _Pitt Pitts_ v. _George_ [1896], 2 Ch., 866.
[1088] [1900], 1 Ch., 73.
[1089] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 9.
[1090] See _Cassell_ v. _Stiff_ (1856), 2 K. and J., 279.
[1091] _Per_ A. L. Smith, J., in _Moul_ v. _Groenings_ [1891], 2 Q.
B., 443.
[1092] _Per_ A. L. Smith, J., in _Moul_ v. _Groenings_ [1891], 2 Q.
B., 443.
[1093] _Schauer_ v. _Field_ [1893], 1 Ch., 35; _Hanfstaengl_ v.
_Holloway_ [1893], 2 Q. B., 1.
[1094] _Schauer_ v. _Field_ [1893], 1 Ch., 35.
[1095] _Per_ A. L. Smith, J., in _Moul_ v. _Groenings_ [1891], 2 Q.
B., 443; but see _Hanfstaengl_ v. _Holloway_ [1893], 2 Q. B., 1.
[1096] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 5 (1); Additional Act of Paris, Art.
I. 3.
[1097] Berne Convention, Art. 5; _cf._ 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 2.
[1098] Berne Convention, Art. 5.
[1099] _Wood_ v. _Chart_ (1870), 10 Eq., 193; _Lauri_ v. _Renad_
[1892], 3 Ch., Kekewich, J., at p. 414.
[1100] _Per_ Sir W. M. James, V. C., in _Wood_ v. _Chart_.
[1101] 15 Vict. c. 12, sec. 7; 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 5 (4);
Additional Act of Paris, Art. I. 4.
[1102] Additional Act of Paris, II. 1.
[1103] Berne Convention, Art. 9.
[1104] 15 Vict. c. 12, sec. 6; 38 and 39 Vict. c. 12, sec. 1; Order in
Council, Nov. 28, 1887, sec. 6.
[1105] _Donaldson_ v. _Becket_ (1774), 2 Bro. P. C., 129; and see
_Millar_ v. _Taylor_ (1769), 4 Burr., 2303; _Tonson_ v. _Collins_
(1760), 1 W. Black., 301, 321.
[1106] See _Cox_ v. _Land and Water_ (1869), L. R., 9 Eq., 324;
_Reade_ v. _Conquest_ (1861), 9 C. B. (N. S.), 755; _Jefferys_ v.
_Boosey_ (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815.
[1107] _Beckford_ v. _Hood_ (1798), 7 T. R., 620.
[1108] _Platt_ v. _Walter_ (1867), 17 L. T. (N. S.), 157.
[1109] See cases cited in arguments in _Tonson_ v. _Collins_ (1760), 1
W. Black., 301, 321; _Donaldson_ v. _Beckett_ (1774), 2 Bro. P. C., p.
138; _Millar_ v. _Taylor_ (1769), 4 Burr., 2303; Lord St. Leonards in
_Jefferys_ v. _Boosey_ (1854), 4 H. L. C., at p. 979.
[1110] _Maxwell_ v. _Hogg_ (1867), L. R., 2 Ch., 307.
[1111] _Kelly_ v. _Hutton_ (1868), L. R., 3 Ch., 703.
[1112] _Dicks_ v. _Yates_ (1881), 18 Ch. D., 76.
[1113] _Licensed Victuallers_ v. _Bingham_ (1888), 38 Ch. D., 139.
[1114] _Kelly_ v. _Byles_ (1879), 40 L. T. (N. S.), 623.
[1115] _Mack_ v. _Petter_ (1872), L. R., 14 Eq., 431.
[1116] _Weldon_ v. _Dicks_ (1878), 10 Ch. D., 247.
[1117] _Dicks_ v. _Yates_ (1881), 18 Ch. D., 76.
[1118] 18 Ch. D., at p. 89.
[1119] _Borthwick_ v. _The Evening Post_ (1888), 37 Ch. D., 449;
_Bradbury_ v. _Beeton_ (1869), 39 L. J. Ch., 57; _Clement_ v.
_Maddick_ (1859), 1 Giff., 98.
[1120] _Kelly_ v. _Hutton_ (1868), L. R., 3 Ch., 703; _Ward_ v.
_Beeton_ (1874), L. R., 19 Eq., 207.
[1121] _Bradbury_ v. _Dickens_ (1859), 27 Beav., 53.
[1122] (1885), 54 L. J. Ch., 1059.
[1123] _Maxwell_ v. _Hogg_ (1867), L. R., 2 Ch., 307; _Licensed
Victuallers_ v. _Bingham_ (1888), 38 Ch. D.; _Correspondent News_ v.
_Saunders_ (1865), 11 Jur. (N. S.), 540.
[1124] _Maxwell_ v. _Hogg_ (1867), L. R., 2 Ch., 307.
[1125] _Schove_ v. _Schmincké_ (1886), 33 Ch. D., 546.
[1126] _Talbot_ v. _Judges_ (1887), 3 T. L. R., 398.
[1127] _Maxwell_ v. _Hogg_ (1867), L. R., 2 Ch., 307.
[1128] _Prowett_ v. _Mortimer_ (1856), 2 Jur. (N. S.), 414.
[1129] _Borthwick_ v. _Evening Post_ (1888), 37 Ch. D., 449; _Clement_
v. _Maddick_ (1859), 1 Giff., 98.
[1130] _Bradbury_ v. _Beeton_ (1869), 39 L. J. Ch., 57.
[1131] (1803), 8 Ves., 215.
[1132] (1824), 3 Sh., 215.
[1133] (1855), 2 K. and J., 117.
[1134] (1855), 2 K. and J., 123.
[1135] (1856), 2 Jur. (N. S.), 414.
[1136] (1859), 1 Giff., 98.
[1137] (1859), 5 Jur. (N. S.), 947.
[1138] (1870), W. N., 268.
[1139] (1873), W. N., 93.
[1140] (1878), 8 Ch. D., 606.
[1141] (1846), 2 Phillips, 154.
[1142] (1857), 3 K. and J., 708.
[1143] (1869), 39 L. J. Ch., 57.
[1144] (1879), 40 L. T. (N. S.), 623.
[1145] (1881), 18 Ch. D., 76.
[1146] (1882), 46 L. T. (N. S.), 897.
[1147] (1885), 54 L. J. Ch., 1059.
[1148] (1888), 37 Ch. D., 449.
[1149] _Hogg_ v. _Kirby_ (1803), 8 Ves., 215.
[1150] _Seeley_ v. _Fisher_ (1841), 11 Sim., 581.
[1151] _Carr_ v. _Hood_ (1808), 1 Camp., 354 _n._
[1152] _Martin_ v. _Wright_ (1833), 6 Sim., 297.
[1153] _Dicks_ v. _Brooks_ (1880), 15 Ch. D., 22; _Ward_ v. _Beeton_
(1874), L. R., 19 Eq., 207; _Seeley_ v. _Fisher_ (1841), 11 Sim., 581.
[1154] _Archbold_ v. _Sweet_ (1832), 5 C. and P., 219.
[1155] (1853), 1 W. R., 345, 11 Hare, 118.
[1156] _Clark_ v. _Freeman_ (1848), 11 Beav., 112.
[1157] (1832), 5 C. and P., 219.
[1158] _The Law Times_, September 28, 1889.
[1159] (1892), 8 T. L. R., 773.
[1160] _Byron_ v. _Johnston_ (1816), 2 Meriv., 29.
[1161] (1820), 1 Jac. and W., 394.
[1162] (1849), 2 De G. and Sm., 652.
[1163] (1874), 43 L. J. Ch., 661.
[1164] _Lamb_ v. _Evans_ [1893], 1 Ch., 218.
[1165] [1892], 2 Ch., 518.
[1166] (1895), 11 T. L. R., 515.
[1167] [1895], 2 Q. B., 315.
[1168] (1894), 11 T. L. R., 4.
[1169] See _Jefferys_ v. _Boosey_ (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815, _per_ Lord
Brougham.
[1170] (1843), 2 Hare, 383, at p. 393.
[1171] (1825), 3 L. J. (O. S.) Ch., 209.
[1172] (1849), 2 De G. and Sm., 652.
[1173] [1897], 2 Ch., 48. _Exchange Telegraph_ v. _Gregory_ [1896], 1
Q. B., 147.
[1174] _Abernethy_ v. _Hutchinson_ (1825), 3 L. J. (O. S.), Ch., 209;
_Prince Albert_ v. _Strange_ (1849), 1 M'N. and G., at p. 45.
[1175] _Bridgman_ v. _Green_ (1755), 2 Ves. Sen., 627, Wilmot's cases,
58.
[1176] _Morison_ v. _Moat_ (1851), 9 Hare, 241.
[1177] _Barfield_ v. _Nicholson_ (1824), 2 Sim. and Stu., 1.
[1178] _Tuck & Sons_ v. _Priester_ (1887), 19 Q. B. D., 629; _Pollard_
v. _Photo. Co._ (1888), 40 Ch. D., 345.
[1179] (1887), 12 A. C., at p. 337.
[1180] (1774), 2 Bro. P. C., 129; 4 Burr., 2408; _Millar_ v. _Taylor_
(1769), 4 Burr., 2303; _Forrester_ v. _Walker_ (1741), 4 Burr., 2331;
_Duke of Queensberry_ v. _Shebbeare_ (1758), 2 Ed., Cha. Cas., 329;
4 Burr., 2330; _Webb_ v. _Rose_ (1732), Amb. 694; _Pope_ v. _Curl_
(1741), 2 Atk., 342.
[1181] (1849), 1 M'N. and G., 25.
[1182] _Millar_ v. _Taylor_, Yates, J., 4 Burr, at p. 2379; and see
_Tonson_ v. _Walker_ (1752), 3 Swanst., 672; _Prince Albert_ v.
_Strange_ (1849), 2 De G. and Sm., 652, at p. 691, 3.
[1183] 2 De G. and Sm., p. 693.
[1184] 2 De G. and Sm., at p. 697.
[1185] (1769), 4 Burr., 2303, at p. 2379.
[1186] _Jefferys_ v. _Boosey_ (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815; _Caird_ v.
_Sime_ (1887), 12 A. C., at p. 343.
[1187] _Abernethy_ v. _Hutchinson_ (1825), 3 L. J. (O. S.), Ch., 209.
See p. 37, _supra_.
[1188] (1770), Amb., 694.
[1189] (1825), 3 L. J. (O. S.), Ch., 209.
[1190] (1884), 26 Ch. D., 374.
[1191] (1887), 12 A. C., 326.
[1192] See _Pope_ v. _Curl_ (1741), 2 Atk., 342.
[1193] 12 A. C., at p. 338.
[1194] _Prince Albert_ v. _Strange_ (1849), 1 M'N. and G., 25; and see
_Mayall_ v. _Higbey_ (1862), 1 H. and C., 148.
[1195] _Southey_ v. _Sherwood_ (1817), 2 Mer., 435.
[1196] _Southey_ v. _Sherwood_ (1817), 2 Mer., 435; and see cases as
to publication of private letters, p. 225.
[1197] _Prince Albert_ v. _Strange_ (1849), 2 De G. and Sm., at p. 697.
[1198] _Southey_ v. _Sherwood_ (1817), 2 Mer., 435.
[1199] _Prince Albert_ v. _Strange_ (1849), 2 De G. and Sm., at p. 688.
[1200] (1825), 3 L. J. (O. S.). Ch., 209.
[1201] (1884), 26 Ch. D., 374.
[1202] (1825), 3 L. J. (O. S.), Ch., 209.
[1203] See p. 57, _supra_.
[1204] _Perceval_ v. _Phipps_ (1813), 2 V. and B., 19.
[1205] _Pope_ v. _Curl_ (1741), 2 Atk., 342; _Thompson_ v. _Stanhope_
(1774), Amb., 737; _Granard_ v. _Dunkin_ (1809), 1 Ball and B., 207;
_Gee_ v. _Pritchard_ (1818), 2 Swanst., 402; _Palin_ v. _Gathercole_
(1844), 1 Coll., 565.
[1206] _Gee_ v. _Pritchard_ (1818), 2 Swanst., 402.
[1207] _Howard_ v. _Gunn_ (1863), 32 Beav., 462.
[1208] _Oliver_ v. _Oliver_ (1861), 11 C. B. (N. S.), 139.
[1209] _Gee_ v. _Pritchard_ (1818), 2 Swanst., 402.
[1210] _Lytton_ v. _Devey_ (1884), 52 L. T. (N. S.), 121.
[1211] _Gee_ v. _Pritchard_ (1818), 2 Swanst., 402.
[1212] _Thompson_ v. _Stanhope_ (1774), Amb., 737; _Lytton_ v. _Devey_
(1884), 52 L. T. (N. S.), 121.
[1213] _Perceval_ v. _Phipps_ (1813), 2 V. and B., 19.
[1214] _Perceval_ v. _Phipps_ (1813), 2 V. and B., 19; _Gee_ v.
_Pritchard_ (1818), 2 Swan., 402; _Palin_ v. _Gathercole_ (1844), 1
Coll., 565; _Lytton_ v. _Devey_ (1884), 52 L. T. (N. S.), 121.
[1215] _Hole_ v. _Bradbury_ (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886; _Stevens_ v.
_Beaming_ (1855), 1 K. and J., 168; _Reade_ v. _Bentley_ (1857), 3 K.
and J., 271.
[1216] _Hole_ v. _Bradbury_ (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886.
[1217] _Griffith_ v. _Tower Publishing_ [1897], 1 Ch., 21.
[1218] _Gibson_ v. _Carruthers_ (1841), 8 M. and W., 321, at pp. 343,
4.
[1219] _Gale_ v. _Leckie_ (1817), 2 Stark, N. P., 107.
[1220] _Gibson_ v. _Carruthers_ (1841), 8 M. and W., 321, at pp. 343,
4.
[1221] _Marshall_ v. _Broadhurst_ (1831), 1 Tyr., 348, at p. 349.
[1222] _Clarke_ v. _Price_ (1819), 2 Wills, C. C., 157; and see
_Whitwood_ v. _Hardman_ [1891], 2 Ch., 416.
[1223] _Gale_ v. _Leckie_ (1817), 2 Stark, 107.
[1224] _Morris_ v. _Colman_ (1812), 18 Ves., 437; _Stiff_ v. _Cassell_
(1856), 2 Jur. (N. S.), 348.
[1225] _Thombleson_ v. _Black_ (1837), 1 Jur., 198.
[1226] _Paton_ v. _Duncan_ (1828), 3 C. and P., 336.
[1227] _Planché_ v. _Colburn_ (1831), 5 C. and P., 58.
[1228] _Warne_ v. _Routledge_ (1874), L. R., 18 Eq., 497.
[1229] Ibid.
[1230] _Reade_ v. _Bentley_ (1857), 3 K. and J., 271.
[1231] _Morris_ v. _Colman_ (1812), 18 Ves., 437; _Stiff_ v. _Cassell_
(1856), 2 Jur. (N. S.), 348.
[1232] _Anstruther_ v. _Bentley_ (1866), 14 W. R., 630.
[1233] _Ward_ v. _Beeton_ (1874), L. R., 19 Eq., 207.
[1234] _Rooney_ v. _Kelly_ (1861), 14 Ir. C. L. R., 158, at p. 178.
[1235] _Barfield_ v. _Nicholson_ (1824), 2 Sim. and Stu., 2; see
_Brooke_ v. _Chitty_ (1831), 2 Coop. Cas., 216; _Blackie_ v. _Aikman_
(1827), 5 S., 719.
[1236] See _Hogg_ v. _Kirby_ (1803), 8 Ves., 215, at p. 222.
[1237] _Reade_ v. _Bentley_ (1857), 3 K. and J., 271.
[1238] Ibid.
[1239] See _Constable_ v. _Brewster_ (1824), 3 S., 215; _Kelly_ v.
_Hutton_ (1868), L. R., 3 Ch., 703; _Platt_ v. _Walter_ (1867), 17 L.
T. (N. S.), 157.
[1240] _Johnson_ v. _Egan_ (1880), 24 Sol. J., 572.
[1241] _Shackell_ v. _Rosier_ (1836), 2 Bing., N. C., 634.
[1242] _Sweet_ v. _Lee_ (1841), 3 Man. and Gr., 452; see _Mavor_ v.
_Pyne_ (1825), 3 Bing., 285; _Boydell_ v. _Drummond_ (1809), 11 East.,
142.
[1243] 54 & 55 Vict. c. 39.
[1244] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 13.
[1245] _Blake_ v. _Nicholson_ (1814), 3 M. and S., 167.
[1246] _Bleaden_ v. _Hancock_ (1829), 4 C. and P., 152.
[1247] 2 & 3 Vict. c. 12, sec. 2; and Newspapers, Printers, and
Reading Rooms Repeal Act, 1869; 32 & 33 Vict. c. 24.
[1248] _Bensley_ v. _Bignold_ (1822), 5 B. and Ald., 335; _Marchant_
v. _Evans_ (1818), 2 Moore, 14; see _Houston_ v. _Mills_ (1834), 1 M.
and Rob., 325.
[1249] _Gillett_ v. _Mawman_ (1808), 1 Taunt., 140.
[1250] _Gillett_ v. _Mawman_ (1808), 1 Taunt., 140; _Mawman_ v.
_Gillett_ (1809), 2 Taunt., 325.
[1251] _Poplett_ v. _Stockdale_ (1825), Ry. and M., 337.
[1252] _Clay_ v. _Yates_ (1856), 1 H. and N., 73.
[1253] See p. 247.
[1254] See pp. 250-264.
[1255] See p. 266.
[1256] _Bullinger_ v. _MacKay_ (1879), 15 Blatchf., 550; _Clayton_ v.
_Stone_ (1828), 2 Paine, 382; _Brightley_ v. _Littleton_ (1888), 37
Fed. Rep., 103.
[1257] _Clayton_ v. _Stone_ (1828), 2 Paine, 382; _Baker_ v. _Selden_
(1879), 101 U. S. Rep., 99; _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591.
[1258] (1828), 2 Paine, 382.
[1259] (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 103.
[1260] (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.
[1261] [1893], 1 Ch., 218 (headings in trades directory).
[1262] [1894], A. C., 335 (circular tours in time-tables).
[1263] (1897), 53 U. S. App., 461.
[1264] [1900], A. C., 539.
[1265] (1897), 53 U. S. App., 461.
[1266] (1882), 21 Ch. D., 369.
[1267] (1879), 101 U. S. Rep., 99.
[1268] (1872), L. R., 14 Eq., 407.
[1269] (1883), 21 Ch. D., 369.
[1270] (1828), 2 Paine, 382.
[1271] (1897), 53 U. S. App., 461.
[1272] (1828), 2 Paine, 382.
[1273] (1879), 101 U. S. Rep., 99.
[1274] _Bullinger_ v. _MacKay_ (1879), 15 Blatchf., 550.
[1275] _Chils_ v. _Gronland_ (1890), 41 Fed. Rep., 145.
[1276] (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.
[1277] (1828), 2 Paine, 382.
[1278] _Mott_ v. _Clow_ (1897), 53 U. S. App., 461.
[1279] _Egbert_ v. _Greenberg_ (1900), 100 Fed. Rep., 447.
[1280] _American Trotting_ v. _Gocher_ (1895), 70 Fed. Rep., 237.
[1281] (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 103.
[1282] (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 979.
[1283] _Mutual Advertising Co._ v. _Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961.
[1284] 76 Fed. Rep., at p. 963.
[1285] _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75; _Daly_ v.
_Webster_ (1892), 1 U. S. App., 573; _Henderson_ v. _Tompkins_ (1894),
60 Fed. Rep., 758.
[1286] (1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 758.
[1287] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617; _Wheaton_ v.
_Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Little_ v. _Hall_ (1855), 18 How., 165;
_Gould_ v. _Banks_ (1832), 8 Wend., 562; _Heine_ v. _Appleton_ (1853),
4 Blatchf., 125; _Cowen_ v. _Banks_ (1862), 24 How. Pr., 72.
[1288] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617.
[1289] _Connecticut_ v. _Gould_ (1888), 34 Fed. Rep., 319; _Gray_ v.
_Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1896), 51 U. S.
App., 216, 64 Fed. Rep., 360.
[1290] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Nash_ v. _Lathrop_
(1886), 142 Mass., 29.
[1291] _Banks_ v. _Manchester_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 244; _Chase_ v.
_Sanborn_ (1874), 4 Cliff., 306.
[1292] _Davidson_ v. _Wheelock_ (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 61; _Banks_ v.
_M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 163; _Howell_ v. _Miller_ (1898), 91
Fed. Rep., 129.
[1293] Ibid.
[1294] Ibid.
[1295] _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, 768; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_
(1869), 4 Cliff., 1; _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep. 764.
[1296] _Brightley_ v. _Littleton_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 103; _Gray_ v.
_Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff.,
at p. 79; _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380.
[1297] _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, 768.
[1298] _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, at p. 780; _Shook_ v.
_Rankin_ (1875), 6 Biss., 477.
[1299] _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75.
[1300] _Boucicault_ v. _Fox_ (1862), 5 Blatchf., 87, at p. 100.
[1301] _Jollie_ v. _Jacques_ (1850), 1 Blatchf., 618. See _Reed_ v.
_Carusi_ (1845), 8 L. R., 411; 72 Fed. Cas., No. 11,642.
[1302] (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 849.
[1303] (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 861.
[1304] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1; _Gray_ v. _Russell_
(1839), 1 Story, 11.
[1305] _Snow_ v. _Laird_ (1900), 98 Fed. Rep., 813.
[1306] _Clayton_ v. _Stone_ (1828), 2 Paine, 382; _Brightley_ v.
_Littleton_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 103; _Mott_ v. _Clow_ (1897), 53
U. S. App., 461.
[1307] _Clayton_ v. _Stone_ (1828), 2 Paine, 382; _Drury_ v. _Ewing_
(1862), 1 Bond, 541.
[1308] (1897), 53 U. S. App., 449.
[1309] (1879), 101 U. S. Rep., 99.
[1310] 101 U. S. Rep., at p. 105.
[1311] (1862), 1 Bond, 541.
[1312] _Coffeen_ v. _Brunton_ (1849), 4 M'Lean, 516; _Scoville_ v.
_Toland_ (1848), 6 West Law, J., 84.
[1313] Rev. St., sec. 4952.
[1314] _Greene_ v. _Bishop_ (1858), 1 Cliff., 186; _Gray_ v. _Russell_
(1839), 1 Story, 11; _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, 768.
[1315] _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; _Bullinger_ v.
_MacKay_ (1879), 15 Blatchf., 550; _Brightley_ v. _Littleton_ (1888),
37 Fed. Rep., 103; _Johnson_ v. _Donaldson_ (1880), 3 Fed. Rep., 22.
[1316] (1841), 2 Story, 100.
[1317] _Isaacs_ v. _Daly_ (1875), 39 N. Y., 511; _Osgood_ v. _Allen_
(1872), 1 Holmes, 185; _Corbett_ v. _Purday_ (1897), 80 Fed. Rep.,
901; _Jollie_ v. _Jacques_ (1850), 1 Blatchf., 618.
[1318] _Osgood_ v. _Allen_ (1872), 1 Holmes, 185; see _Roberts_ v.
_Myers_ (1860), 13 L. R. (Mass.), 398; _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56
Fed. Rep., 764.
[1319] _Isaacs_ v. _Daly_ (1875), 39 N. Y., 511.
[1320] Rev. St., secs. 4937-4947.
[1321] _Wood_ v. _Abbott_ (1866), 5 Blatchf., 325.
[1322] _Schreiber_ v. _Thornton_ (1883), 17 Fed. Rep., 603;
_Burrow-Giles_ v. _Sarony_ (1884), 111 U. S. Rep., 53; _Falk_ v. _Gast_
(1891), 48 Fed. Rep., 262; _Falk_ v. _Brett_ (1891), 48 Fed. Rep.,
678; _Bolles_ v. _Outing_ (1899), 175 U. S. Rep., 262; 77 Fed. Rep.,
966.
[1323] _Bolles_ v. _Outing_ (1899), 175 U. S. Rep., 262; 77 Fed. Rep.,
966.
[1324] _Falk_ v. _Gast_ (1891), 48 Fed. Rep., 262; _Falk_ v. _Brett_
(1891), 48 Fed. Rep., 678; _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep.,
32.
[1325] _Bolles_ v. _Outing_ (1899), 175 U. S. Rep., 262; 77 Fed. Rep.,
966.
[1326] _Snow_ v. _Laird_ (1900), 98 Fed. Rep., 813.
[1327] _Binns_ v. _Woodruff_ (1821), 4 Wash. C. Ct., 48; _Ehret_ v.
_Pierce_ (1880), 18 Blatchf. 302.
[1328] _Mott_ v. _Clow_ (1897), 53 U. S. App., 461.
[1329] _Collender_ v. _Griffith_ (1878), 11 Blatchf., 212.
[1330] _Ehret_ v. _Pierce_ (1880), 18 Blatchf., 302.
[1331] _Courier_ v. _Donaldson_ (1900), 104 Fed. Rep., 993;
_Bleistein_ v. _Donaldson_ (1899), 98 Fed. Rep., 608.
[1332] _Yuengling_ v. _Schile_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 97.
[1333] _Richardson_ v. _Miller_ (1877), 3 L. and Eq. Rep. (Am.), 614.
[1334] (1888), 35 Fed. Rep., 210.
[1335] _Coffeen_ v. _Brunton_ (1849), 4 M'L., 516; _Higgins_ v.
_Keuffel_ (1891), 140 U. S. Rep., 428.
[1336] _Schumacher_ v. _Schwencke_ (1885), 23 Blatchf., 373; 25 Fed.
Rep., 466.
[1337] _Rosenbach_ v. _Dreyfuss_ (1880), 2 Fed. Rep., 217.
[1338] _Yuengling_ v. _Schile_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 97, 102.
[1339] See _Yuengling_ v. _Schile_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., at p. 102.
[1340] _Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 2 Biss., 34.
[1341] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 3, amending Revised Statutes, sec.
4956.
[1342] Ibid.
[1343] Act of March 3, 1891, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4959.
[1344] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 11.
[1345] _Jollie_ v. _Jacques_ (1850), 1 Blatchf., 618; _Struve_ v.
_Schwedler_ (1857), 4 Blatchf., 23; _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8
Pet., 591; _Chase_ v. _Sanborne_ (1874), 4 Cliff., 306; _Merrell_
v. _Tice_ (1881), 104 U. S. Rep., 557; _Baker_ v. _Taylor_ (1848),
2 Blatchf., 82; _Carte_ v. _Evans_ (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 861;
_Thompson_ v. _Hubbard_ (1888), 131 U. S. Rep., 123; _Callaghan_ v.
_Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617; _Parkinson_ v. _Lascelle_ (1875),
3 Sawyer, 330; _Boucicault_ v. _Hart_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 47;
_Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1; _Ewer_ v. _Coxe_ (1824), 4
Wash. C. Ct., 487.
[1346] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Merrell_ v. _Tice_
(1881), 104 U. S. Rep., 557; _Banks_ v. _Manchester_ (1888), 128 U. S.,
244; _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1896), 64 Fed. Rep., 360.
[1347] _Osgood_ v. _Aloe_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 470.
[1348] _Chicago_ v. _Butler_ (1884), 19 Fed. Rep., 758; _Parkinson_
v. _Lascelle_ (1875), 3 Sawyer, 330; _Merrell_ v. _Tice_ (1881), 104
U. S., Rep., 557.
[1349] _Osgood_ v. _Aloe_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 470.
[1350] _Chase_ v. _Sanborne_ (1874), 4 Cliff., 306.
[1351] _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1883), 18 Fed. Rep., 539.
[1352] _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1898), 84 Hun., 12; 155 N. Y.,
241; see _Scribner_ v. _Allen_ (1892), 49 Fed. Rep., 854; _Boucicault_
v. _Hart_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 47.
[1353] _Falk_ v. _Gast_ (1891), 48 Fed. Rep., 262.
[1354] (1882), 20 Blatchf., 381.
[1355] _Carte_ v. _Evans_ (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 681.
[1356] (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.
[1357] (1889), 39 Fed. Rep., 265.
[1358] (1892), 1 U. S. App., 573.
[1359] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.
[1360] _Bennett_ v. _Carr_ (1899), 96 Fed. Rep., 213.
[1361] _Belford_ v. _Scribner_ (1892), 144 U. S. Rep., 488; _Chapman_
v. _Ferry_ (1883), 18 Fed. Rep., 539; _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57
Fed. Rep., 32.
[1362] _Osgood_ v. _Aloe_ (1897), 72 Off. Gaz., 418.
[1363] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., at p. 655;
_Belford_ v. _Scribner_ (1892), 144 U. S. Rep., 488; _Merrell_ v.
_Tice_ (1881), 104 U. S. Rep., 557; _Blume_ v. _Spear_ (1887), 30 Fed.
Rep., 629.
[1364] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.
[1365] Ibid.
[1366] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 3, amending Revised Statutes, sec.
4956.
[1367] _Littleton_ v. _Oliver_ (1894), 62 Fed. Rep., 597.
[1368] Ibid.
[1369] Act of June 18, 1874, sec. 1. This section supersedes the
Revised Statutes, sec. 4962.
[1370] Ibid.
[1371] Act of August 1, 1882.
[1372] Act of June 18, 1874, sec. 1.
[1373] _Jackson_ v. _Walkie_ (1886), 29 Fed. Rep., 15.
[1374] _Falk_ v. _Schumacher_ (1891), 48 Fed. Rep., 222.
[1375] _Hefel_ v. _Whitely_ (1893), 54 Fed. Rep., 179; and see
_Garland_ v. _Gemmill_ (1887), 14 S. C. R., 321.
[1376] _Osgood_ v. _Aloe_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 470.
[1377] _Scribner_ v. _Allen & Co._ (1892), 49 Fed. Rep., 854;
_Werckmeister_ v. _Springer_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 808.
[1378] _The Illustrated American_ v. _New York Press_ (1892), cited in
argument, 1 U. S. Rep., 594.
[1379] _Burrow-Giles_ v. _Sarony_ (1884), 111 U. S. Rep., 53.
[1380] _Bolles_ v. _Outing_ (1899), 77 Fed. Rep., 966; 175 U. S. Rep.,
262.
[1381] Ibid.
[1382] _Werckmeister_ v. _Springer_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 808.
[1383] (1901), 107 Fed. Rep., 708.
[1384] (1848), 2 Blatchf., 82.
[1385] (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617.
[1386] (1888), 35 Fed. Rep., 210.
[1387] _Snow_ v. _Mast_ (1895), 65 Fed. Rep., 995; _Bolles_ v.
_Outing_ (1899), 175 U. S. Rep., 262.
[1388] (1869), 4 Cliff. 1, at p. 61.
[1389] Ibid.
[1390] (1875), 13 Blatchf., 163.
[1391] Act of June 18, 1874, sec. 1; _Thompson_ v. _Hubbard_ (1888),
131 U. S. Rep., 123.
[1392] _Thompson_ v. _Hubbard_ (1888), 131 U. S. Rep., 123.
[1393] _Falk_ v. _Gast_ (1891), 48 Fed. Rep., 262; _Falk_ v. _Gast_
(1893), 54 Fed. Rep., 890.
[1394] _Springer_ v. _Falk_ (1894), 20 U. S. App., 296.
[1395] _Dewight_ v. _Appleton_ (1842), 1 N. Y. Leg. Obs., 195.
[1396] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 11.
[1397] _Pierce_ v. _Werckmeister_ (1896), 72 Fed. Rep. 57.
[1398] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1890), 42 Fed. Rep., 168.
[1399] _Pulte_ v. _Derby_ (1852), 5 M'L., 328; M'Lean, J., at p. 332.
[1400] See _Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 2 Biss., 34.
[1401] (1875), 13 Blatchf., 47.
[1402] (1896), 84 Hun., 12.
[1403] (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.
[1404] (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.
[1405] (1898), 155 N. Y., 241.
[1406] _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1895), 84 Hun., 12.
[1407] _Osgood_ v. _Aloe_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 470; _Gottsberger_
v. _Aldine_ (1887), 33 Fed. Rep., 381; _Baker_ v. _Taylor_ (1848), 2
Blatchf., 82.
[1408] _Per_ Parker, Ch. J., in _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1898),
155 N. Y., at p. 251.
[1409] _D'Ole_ v. _Kansas_ (1899), 94 Fed. Rep., 840.
[1410] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764; see _Baker_ v.
_Taylor_ (1848), 2 Blatchf., 82; _Wall_ v. _Gordon_ (1872), 12 Abb.
Pr. N. S. (N. Y.), 349.
[1411] _Press Publishing Co._ v. _Monroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep.,
196; and see _Blunt_ v. _Patten_ (1828), 2 Paine, 397; _Keene_ v.
_Wheatley_ (1860), 9 Am. L. Reg., 45.
[1412] _Bartlett_ v. _Crittenden_ (1847), 4 M'L., 301.
[1413] _Falk_ v. _Gast_ (1893), 54 Fed. Rep., 890.
[1414] _French_ v. _Kreling_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 621.
[1415] _Kiernan_ v. _Manhattan_ (1876), 50 How. Prac., 194.
[1416] _Rigney_ v. _Dalton_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 176.
[1417] _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1898), 155 N. Y., 241.
[1418] _Larrowe_ v. _O'Loughlin_ (1898), 88 Fed. Rep., 896.
[1419] _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_ (1898), 155 N. Y., 241; _Ladd_ v.
_Oxnard_ (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.
[1420] _Holmes_ v. _Hurst_ (1898), 174 U. S. Rep. 82; _Holmes_ v.
_Donohue_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 179; _Mifflin_ v. _Dutton_ (1901), 107
Fed. Rep., 708.
[1421] See _Bartlett_ v. _Crittenden_ (1847), 4 M. L., 301; _Rees_ v.
_Peltzer_ (1874), 75 Ill., 475; _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_ (1860), 9 Am. L.
Rep., 45; _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532.
[1422] _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532; _Aronson_ v.
_Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75; _Bartlett_ v. _Crittenden_
(1847), 4 M'L., 301; _Boucicault_ v. _Hart_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 47;
_Tompkins_ v. _Halleck_ (1882), 133 Mass., 32; _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_
(1860), 4 Phil., 157; _Keene_ v. _Kimball_ (1860), 16 Gray, 549;
_Boucicault_ v. _Fox_ (1862), 5 Blatchf., 87; _Crowe_ v. _Aiken_
(1870), 2 Biss., 208; _Thomas_ v. _Lennox_ (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 849;
_Keene_ v. _Clarke_ (1867), 5 Rob. (N. Y.), 38; _Shook_ v. _Rankin_
(1875), 6 Biss., 477; _French_ v. _Maguire_ (1867), 55 How. (N. Y.)
Prac., 471.
[1423] _Pierce_ v. _Werckmeister_ (1896), 72 Fed. Rep., 57.
[1424] _Werckmeister_ v. _Springer_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 808.
[1425] _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532; _Boucicault_ v.
_Wood_ (1867), 2 Biss., 34; _Crowe_ v. _Aiken_ (1870), 2 Biss., 208.
[1426] _Daly_ v. _Walrath_ (1899), 40 App. Div., N. Y., 220.
[1427] Ibid.
[1428] _Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 2 Biss., at p. 39.
[1429] Act of 1891, sec. 4, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4958; and
see Act, June 18, 1874, sec. 2.
[1430] Act of 1891, sec. 4.
[1431] Ibid.
[1432] Revised Statutes, sec. 4961.
[1433] Revised Statutes, sec. 4960.
[1434] _Martinetti_ v. _Maguire_ (1867), 1 Abb. U. S., 356; _Shook_ v.
_Daly_ (1875), 49 How. Prac., 366; _Keene_ v. _Kimball_ (1860), 16
Gray, 549.
[1435] _Broder_ v. _Zeno_ (1898), 88 Fed. Rep., 74.
[1436] Ibid.
[1437] _Richardson_ v. _Miller_ (1877), 3 L. and Eq. Rep. (Am.), 614.
[1438] _Egbert_ v. _Greenberg_ (1900), 100 Fed. Rep., 447.
[1439] _American Trotting Register_ v. _Gocker_ (1895), 70 Fed. Rep.,
237.
[1440] Revised Statutes, sec. 4953.
[1441] Act of 1891, sec. 2.
[1442] (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617.
[1443] _Pierpont_ v. _Fowle_ (1846), 2 Wood, and Min., 23, 44; _Cowen_
v. _Banks_ (1862), 24 How. Prac., 72; see _Rundell_ v. _Murray_
(1821), Jac., 315.
[1444] _Paige_ v. _Banks_ (1871), 13 Wall, 608; (1871), 7 Blatchf.,
152.
[1445] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591, 654.
[1446] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1.
[1447] _Koppel_ v. _Downing_, 24 Wash. L. R., 342.
[1448] _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165; _Green_ v.
_Bishop_ (1858), 1 Cliff., 186, 198; _Yuengling_ v. _Schile_ (1882),
12 Fed. Rep., 97, 100.
[1449] _Yuengling_ v. _Schile_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., at p. 106.
[1450] _Heine_ v. _Appleton_ (1853), 4 Blatchf., 125.
[1451] _Press_ v. _Munroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196; _Black_ v.
_Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.
[1452] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.
[1453] _Burrow-Giles_ v. _Sarony_ (1884), 111 U. S., 53.
[1454] _Bullinger_ v. _MacKay_ (1879), 15 Blatchf., 550.
[1455] _Atwill_ v. _Ferrett_ (1846), 2 Blatchf., 39; _Roberts_ v.
_Myers_ (1860), 13 L. R. Mass., 396.
[1456] _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; Betts, J., in _Atwill_
v. _Ferrett_ (1846), 2 Blatchf., at p. 46.
[1457] _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75.
[1458] _Carte_ v. _Bailey_ (1874), 64 Maine, 458.
[1459] _Colliery_ v. _Schools_ (1899), 94 Fed. Rep., 152; _Schumacher_
v. _Schwencke_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 466; _Mutual Advertising_ v.
_Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4
Cliff., 1; _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165; _Heine_ v.
_Appleton_ (1853), 4 Blatchf., 125; but see _Pierpont_ v. _Fowle_
(1846), 2 Woodb. and M., 23; _Atwill_ v. _Ferrett_ (1846), 2 Blatchf.,
39.
[1460] _Dielman_ v. _White_ (1900), 102 Fed. Rep., 892.
[1461] _Boucicault_ v. _Fox_ (1862), 5 Blatchf., 87.
[1462] _Press_ v. _Munroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196; _Black_ v.
_Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.
[1463] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, at pp. 59, 66.
[1464] _Banks_ v. _Manchester_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., at p. 253.
[1465] Ibid.
[1466] _Schumacher_ v. _Schwencke_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 466; _Mutual
Advertising_ v. _Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961.
[1467] (1853), 4 Blatchf., 125
[1468] _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165.
[1469] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617; _Black_
v. _Allen_ (1890), 42 Fed. Rep., 618; _Carte_ v. _Evans_ (1886), 27
Fed. Rep., 861; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, at p. 59;
_Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165.
[1470] _Pulte_ v. _Derby_ (1852), 5 M'L., 328; _Little_ v. _Gould_
(1851), 2 Blatchf., 165; _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1.
[1471] Act of February 3, 1831, sec. 9; _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3
Cliff., at p. 549; but see _contra_, _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4
Cliff., 1, at p. 59; _Pulte_ v. _Derby_ (1852), 5 M'L., 328.
[1472] _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., 537; _Yuengling_ v.
_Schile_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 97; _Werckmeister_ v. _Springer_
(1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 808; _Stevens_ v. _Gladding_ (1854), 17 How.,
447; _Stephens_ v. _Cady_ (1852), 14 How., 528; _Carte_ v. _Bailey_
(1874), 64 Maine, 458; see _MacKaye_ v. _Mallory_ (1882), 12 Fed.
Rep., 328.
[1473] _Webb_ v. _Powers_ (1847), 2 Woodb. and Min., 497; see _Gould_
v. _Banks_, _Stephens_ v. _Cady_, _Little_ v. _Hall_, _ubi supra_.
[1474] _Gould_ v. _Banks_ (1832), 8 Wend., 562.
[1475] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764; _Carte_ v.
_Evans_ (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 861.
[1476] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1889), 38 Fed. Rep., 846.
[1477] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764; _Carte_ v.
_Bailey_ (1874), 64 Maine, 458.
[1478] _Werckmeister_ v. _Springer_ (1894), 63 Fed. Rep., 808.
[1479] _Publishing Co._ v. _Munroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196.
[1480] _Davies_ v. _Vories_, 42 S. W., 707.
[1481] _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_ (1860), 9 Am. L. Reg., 45.
[1482] But see _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2 Blatchf., 165.
[1483] _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75.
[1484] Revised Statutes, sec. 4952.
[1485] _Stephens_ v. _Cady_ (1852), 14 How., 528; _Stevens_ v.
_Gladding_ (1854), 17 How., 451.
[1486] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 1.
[1487] _Harper_ v. _Shoppell_ (1886), 23 Blatchf., 431.
[1488] _Morrison_ v. _Pettibone_ (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330.
[1489] _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 32; _Fishel_ v.
_Lueckel_ (1892), 53 Fed. Rep., 499; _Springer_ v. _Falk_ (1894), 20
U. S. App., 296.
[1490] _Falk_ v. _Howell_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 202.
[1491] _Kennedy_ v. _McTammany_ (1888), 33 Fed. Rep., 584.
[1492] _Ladd_ v. _Oxnard_ (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703.
[1493] _Schumacher_ v. _Schwencke_ (1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 690.
[1494] _Maloney_ v. _Foote_ (1900), 101 Fed. Rep., 264.
[1495] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, 81; _Folsom_ v.
_Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, 118; _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L.,
310; _Reed_ v. _Holliday_ (1884), 19 Fed. Rep., 323; _Brady_ v. _Daly_
(1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 1007; _M'Lean_ v. _Flemming_ (1877), 96 U. S.
Rep., 245; _Fishel_ v. _Lueckel_ (1892), 53 Fed. Rep., 499; _Morrison_
v. _Pettibone_ (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330; _Millet_ v. _Snowden_
(1843), 1 West L. J., 240; _Parker_ v. _Hulme_ (1849), 7 West L. J.,
426.
[1496] _Morrison_ v. _Pettibone_ (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330.
[1497] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, 81; _Webb_ v.
_Powers_ (1847), 2 Wood and Min., 497.
[1498] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, p. 73.
[1499] _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380.
[1500] _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1896), 51 U. S. App., 216.
[1501] _Bullinger_ v. _MacKay_ (1879), 15 Blatchf. C. C., 550.
[1502] _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, 768.
[1503] Ibid.
[1504] _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11.
[1505] _Blunt_ v. _Patten_ (1828), 2 Paine, 397.
[1506] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1889), 38 Fed. Rep., 846.
[1507] _Johnson_ v. _Donaldson_ (1880), 3 Fed. Rep., 22.
[1508] _Banks_ v. _M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., p. 163; _Mead_ v.
_West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380.
[1509] _Banks_ v. _M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., at pp. 165, 6.
[1510] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1889), 38 Fed. Rep., 846.
[1511] _Thomas_ v. _Lennox_ (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 849.
[1512] See _Carte_ v. _Duff_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 183.
[1513] Clifford, J., in _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., at
p. 80; _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_
(1841), 2 Story, 100; _Farmer_ v. _Elstner_ (1888), 33 Fed. Rep.,
494; _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 315; _Emerson_ v. _Davis_
(1845), 3 Story, at p. 795; _Reed_ v. _Holliday_ (1884), 19 Fed. Rep.,
325; _Greene_ v. _Bishop_ (1858), 1 Cliff., 186.
[1514] Story, J., in _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, at p. 115.
[1515] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 1, 81, 83; _Perris_ v.
_Hexamer_ (1878), 99 U. S. Rep., 674; _Morrison_ v. _Pettibone_ (1897),
87 Fed. Rep., 330.
[1516] Although this is an element in the question of substantiality,
it is no answer to a charge of infringement to say that the infringing
composition would have been equally valuable without the borrowed
matter. _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 1007.
[1517] (1897), 87 Fed. Rep., 330.
[1518] _Howell_ v. _Miller_ (1898), 91 Fed. Rep., 129.
[1519] _Springer_ v. _Falk_ (1894), 20 U. S. App., 296; _Falk_ v.
_Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 32; _Fishel_ v. _Lueckel_ (1892), 53
Fed. Rep., 499.
[1520] _Farmer_ v. _Culvert_ (1872), 5 Am. L. T. R., 168; see _Sanborn_
v. _Dakin_ (1889), 39 Fed. Rep., 266.
[1521] _Daly_ v. _Palmer_ (1868), 6 Blatchf., 256; _Daly_ v. _Webster_
(1892), 1 U. S. App., 611; _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1897), 83 Fed. Rep., 1007.
[1522] _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 32; _Falk_ v.
_Howell_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 202.
[1523] _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380; _List_ v. _Keller_
(1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 772.
[1524] Ibid.
[1525] _List_ v. _Keller_ (1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 772.
[1526] (1875), 13 Blatchf., at p. 166.
[1527] Story, J., in _Emerson_ v. _Davis_ (1845), 3 Story, at p. 793.
[1528] _Daly_ v. _Palmer_ (1868), 6 Blatchf., 256; _Daly_ v. _Webster_
(1892), 1 U. S. App., 573; _Goldmark_ v. _Kreling_ (1888), 35 Fed.
Rep., 661.
[1529] _Broder_ v. _Zeno_ (1898), 88 Fed. Rep., 74; _Blume_ v. _Spear_
(1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 629; _Jollie_ v. _Jacques_ (1850), 1 Blatchf.,
618.
[1530] _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1894), 64 Fed. Rep., 361.
[1531] _List Publishing Co._ v. _Keller_ (1887), 30 Fed. Rep., 772.
[1532] _Sanborn_ v. _Dakin_ (1889), 39 Fed. Rep., 266; _Farmer_ v.
_Culvert_ (1872), 5 Am. L. T. R., 168.
[1533] _Chils_ v. _Gronland_ (1890), 41 Fed. Rep., 145; _Webb_ v.
_Powers_ (1847), 2 Wood. and Min., 497.
[1534] _Banks_ v. _M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 163; _Mead_ v.
_West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380; _Howell_ v. _Miller_ (1898), 91 Fed.
Rep., 129.
[1535] _Banks_ v. _M'Divitt_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 163.
[1536] _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80 Fed. Rep., 380.
[1537] _Burnell_ v. _Chown_ (1895), 69 Fed. Rep., 993.
[1538] _Munro_ v. _Smith_ (1890), 42 Fed. Rep., 266.
[1539] _Ehret_ v. _Pierce_ (1880), 18 Blatchf., 302; _Mutual
Advertising Co._ v. _Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961.
[1540] _Mutual Advertising Co._ v. _Refo_ (1896), 76 Fed. Rep., 961.
[1541] _Serrana_ v. _Jefferson_ (1888), 33 Fed. Rep., 347.
[1542] (1879), 15 Blatchf., 550.
[1543] _Ladd_ v. _Oxnard_ (1896), 75 Fed. Rep., 703; _Brightley_ v.
_Littleton_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 103; _Mead_ v. _West_ (1896), 80
Fed. Rep., 380; _Springer_ v. _Falk_ (1894), 20 U. S. App., 296.
[1544] _Drury_ v. _Ewing_ (1862), 1 Bond., 549.
[1545] _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 306; _Webb_ v. _Powers_
(1847), 2 Wood. and Min., 497, 512.
[1546] _Falk_ v. _Donaldson_ (1893), 57 Fed. Rep., 32.
[1547] _Falk_ v. _Howell_ (1888), 37 Fed. Rep., 202.
[1548] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1889), 38 Fed. Rep., 846.
[1549] (1839), 1 Story, 11; see _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L.,
306; _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, 100, 116.
[1550] Gifford, J., in _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Giff., 82; see
Story, J., in _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story, p. 106; _Story_ v.
_Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., at p. 309.
[1551] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., p. 78; _Story_ v.
_Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 309; _Folsom_ v. _Marsh_ (1841), 2 Story,
106; _Gray_ v. _Russell_ (1839), 1 Story, 11; _Stowe_ v. _Thomas_
(1853), 2 Wall. Jr., p. 547; _Keene_ v. _Wheatley_ (1860), 9 Am. L.
R., 45.
[1552] (1847), 4 M'L., 306.
[1553] _Story_ v. _Holcombe_ (1847), 4 M'L., 308, 309.
[1554] (1869), 4 Cliff., 78.
[1555] _Lawrence_ v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., pp. 78, 79.
[1556] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 1.
[1557] Act of July 18, 1870; Revised Statutes, 1874, sec. 4952.
[1558] _Stowe_ v. _Thomas_ (1853), 2 Wall. Jr., 547.
[1559] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 1.
[1560] Act of Congress, Aug. 18, 1856.
[1561] (1868), 6 Blatchf., 256, at p. 264.
[1562] (1868), 6 Blatchf., at p. 264.
[1563] _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1899), 175 U. S. Rep., 148; _Daly_ v.
_Webster_ (1892), 1 U. S. App., 573.
[1564] See _Carte_ v. _Duff_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 183.
[1565] Act of 1891, sec. 7, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4964.
[1566] Act of March 2, 1895, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4965, and
Act of 1891, sec. 8.
[1567] It has been suggested that this division of penalties applies
only to "paintings, statues, and statuary." _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_
(1887), 7 How., 8 Sup. Ct., 618.
[1568] _Taylor_ v. _Gilman_ (1885), 24 Fed. Rep., 632.
[1569] _Bennett_ v. _Boston_ (1900), 101 Fed., Rep., 445.
[1570] Act of Jan. 6, 1897, amending Revised Statutes, sec. 4966.
[1571] _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 693.
[1572] _Stevens_ v. _Gladding_ (1854), 17 How., 447; _Falk_ v. _Gast_
(1893), 54 Fed. Rep., 890; _Belford_ v. _Scribner_ (1892), 144 U. S.
Rep., 488; _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 693.
[1573] _West_ v. _Lawyers_ (1894), 64 Fed. Rep., 360; _Belford_ v.
_Scribner_ (1892), 144 U. S. Rep., 488; _Farmer_ v. _Elstner_ (1888),
33 Fed. Rep., 494.
[1574] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617; _Lawrence_
v. _Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 85; _Elizabeth_ v. _Pavement Co._ (1877),
97 U. S. Rep., 126, 139.
[1575] _Callaghan_ v. _Myers_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 617.
[1576] Ibid.
[1577] _Gilmore_ v. _Anderson_ (1890), 42 Fed. Rep., 267.
[1578] _Daly_ v. _Brady_ (1895), 69 Fed. Rep., 285; _Atwill_ v.
_Ferrett_ (1846), 2 Blatchf., 39; Revised Statutes, sec. 860.
[1579] _Taylor_ v. _Gilman_ (1885), 24 Fed. Rep., 632; _Johnson_ v.
_Donaldson_ (1880), 3 Fed. Rep., 22; _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1882), 12
Fed. Rep., 693.
[1580] _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 7 How., at p. 614; _Springer_
v. _Falk_ (1894), 20 U. S. App., 296.
[1581] _Falk_ v. _Heffron_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 299.
[1582] Ibid.
[1583] Revised Statutes, sec. 4965.
[1584] _Bolles_ v. _Outing_ (1899), 77 Fed. Rep., 966; _Reed_ v.
_Carusi_ (1845), 72 Fed. Cas., No. 11, 642; _Backus_ v. _Gould_
(1849), 7 How., 798; _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 124 U. S. Rep.,
612; _Falk_ v. _Curtis_ (1901), 107 Fed. Rep., 126; (1900), 98 Fed.
Rep., 989; _Child_ v. _New York Times_ (1901), 110 Fed. Rep., 527.
[1585] _Falk_ v. _Curtis_ (1900), 100 Fed. Rep., 77.
[1586] _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 124 U. S. Rep., 612.
[1587] _Chapman_ v. _Ferry_ (1882), 12 Fed. Rep., 693.
[1588] Previous demand is not a condition precedent; _Hegemen_ v.
_Springer_ (1901), 110 Fed. Rep., 374.
[1589] _Rogers_ v. _Jewett_ (1858), 12 L. R., 339.
[1590] _Sarony_ v. _Ehrich_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 79.
[1591] See _Williams_ v. _Smythe_ (1901), 110 Fed. Rep., 961.
[1592] _Harper_ v. _Holman_ (1897), 84 Fed. Rep., 224; _Colliery_ v.
_Schools_ (1899), 24 Fed. Rep., 152; _Little_ v. _Gould_ (1851), 2
Blatchf., at p. 184.
[1593] _Hubbard_ v. _Thompson_ (1882), 14 Fed. Rep., 689; _Trow_ v.
_Boyd_ (1899), 97 Fed. Rep., 586.
[1594] _Reed_ v. _Holliday_ (1884), 19 Fed. Rep., 325; _Black_ v.
_Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.
[1595] _Daly_ v. _Palmer_ (1868), 6 Blatchf., 256.
[1596] _Stuart_ v. _Smith_ (1895), 68 Fed. Rep., 189.
[1597] _Falk_ v. _Curtis_ (1900), 98 Fed. Rep., 989.
[1598] _Belford_ v. _Scribner_ (1892), 144 U. S. Rep., 488.
[1599] _Fishel_ v. _Lueckel_ (1892), 53 Fed. Rep., 499.
[1600] _Trow_ v. _Boyd_ (1899), 97 Fed. Rep., 586.
[1601] _Taylor_ v. _Gilman_ (1885), 24 Fed. Rep., 632.
[1602] _McDonald_ v. _Hearst_ (1899), 95 Fed. Rep., 656.
[1603] _Thornton_ v. _Schreiber_ (1887), 7 How., at p. 614; _Springer_
v. _Falk_(1894), 20 U. S. App., 296.
[1604] Revised Statutes, sec. 4968.
[1605] _Wheeler_ v. _Cobbey_ (1895), 70 Fed. Rep., 487; _Daly_ v.
_Brady_ (1895), 69 Fed. Rep., 285; see _Brady_ v. _Daly_ (1899), 175
U. S. Rep., at p. 158.
[1606] _Black_ v. _Allen_ (1893), 56 Fed. Rep., 764.
[1607] _Hill_ v. _Epley_ (1858), 31 Perm. St., 331; _Lawrence_ v.
_Dana_ (1869), 4 Cliff., 83; _Heine_ v. _Appleton_ (1853), 4 Blatchf.,
125; _Menendez_ v. _Holt_ (1888), 128 U. S., 514; _Keene_ v. _Clarke_
(1867), 5 Robertson, N. Y., 38, 66, 67.
[1608] _Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 2 Biss., 34.
[1609] _Falk_ v. _Schumacher_ (1891), 48 Fed. Rep., 232.
[1610] Ibid.
[1611] _Scribner_ v. _Allen_ (1892), 49 Fed. Rep., 854.
[1612] Revised Statutes, sec. 4969; sec. 914; see _Johnston_ v.
_Klopsch_ (1898), 88 Fed. Rep., 692.
[1613] Revised Statutes, sec. 4963, amended Act, March 3, 1897.
[1614] _Ross_ v. _Raphael Tuck_ (1898), 91 Fed. Rep., 128.
[1615] _Rosenbach_ v. _Dreyfus_ (1880), 2 Fed. Rep., 217.
[1616] _Taft_ v. _Stephens_ (1889), 39 Fed. Rep., 781.
[1617] _Rigney_ v. _Raphael Tuck_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 173.
[1618] _Rigney_ v. _Dalton_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 176.
[1619] Ibid.
[1620] _Hoertel_ v. _Raphael Tuck_ (1899), 94 Fed. Rep., 844.
[1621] _Rigney_ v. _Dalton_ (1896), 77 Fed. Rep., 176.
[1622] Revised Statutes, sec. 4956, amended March 3, 1891, 26 S. L.,
1107.
[1623] 26 S. L., 604.
[1624] 26 S. L., 604.
[1625] Ibid.
[1626] Ibid.
[1627] Ibid.
[1628] Revised Statute, sec. 4956, amended March 3, 1891, 26 S. L.,
694.
[1629] Ibid.
[1630] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Banks_ v.
_Manchester_ (1888), 128 U. S. Rep., 244; _Jewellers'_ v. _Jewellers'_
(1898), 155 N. Y., 241; _Holmes_ v. _Hurst_ (1898), 174 U. S. Rep.,
82; _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532; _West_ v. _Lawyers_
(1896), 64 Fed. Rep., 360; _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., 537;
_Merrell_ v. _Tice_ (1881), 104 U. S. Rep., 557; _Boucicault_ v. _Hart_
(1875), 13 Blatchf., 47; _Boucicault_ v. _Fox_ (1862), 5 Blatchf., 87;
_Boucicault_ v. _Wood_ (1867), 7 Am. L. R., 550; 2 Bis., 34; _Daly_ v.
_Walrath_ (1899), 40 App. Div. N. Y., 220; _Carte_ v. _Ford_ (1883), 15
Fed. Rep., 439; _Carte_ v. _Duff_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 183; _Rees_ v.
_Peltzer_ (1874), 75 Ill., 475; _Ewer_ v. _Coxe_ (1824), 4 Wash. C.
C., 487.
[1631] _Boucicault_ v. _Hart_ (1875), 13 Blatchf., 47; _Daly_ v.
_Walrath_ (1899), 40 App. Div. N. Y., 220; _Carte_ v. _Ford_ (1883), 15
Fed. Rep., 439; _Carte_ v. _Duff_ (1885), 25 Fed. Rep., 183.
[1632] _M'Lean_ v. _Fleming_ (1877), 96 U. S. Rep., 245; _Estes_ v.
_Williams_ (1884), 21 Fed. Rep., 189; _Social Register_ v. _Howard_
(1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 270.
[1633] _Harper_ v. _Holman_ (1897), 84 Fed. Rep., 224.
[1634] _Social Register_ v. _Howard_ (1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 270.
[1635] _Estes_ v. _Williams_ (1884), 21 Fed. Rep., 189; _Estes_ v.
_Leslie_ (1886), 27 Fed. Rep., 22.
[1636] _Aronson_ v. _Fleckenstein_ (1886), 28 Fed. Rep., 75.
[1637] _Merriam_ v. _Holloway_ (1890), 43 Fed. Rep., 450; _Merriam_ v.
_Famous Shoe_ (1891), 47 Fed. Rep., 411.
[1638] Ibid.
[1639] _Clemens_ v. _Belford_ (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 728.
[1640] _Clemens_ v. _Belford_ (1883), 14 Fed. Rep., 728; _Drummond_ v.
_Altemus_ (1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 338.
[1641] _Drummond_ v. _Altemus_ (1894), 60 Fed. Rep., 338.
[1642] _Kipling_ v. _Fenno_ (1900), 106 Fed. Rep., 692.
[1643] _Doan_ v. _American Book Co._ (1901), 105 Fed. Rep., 772.
[1644] _Merriam_ v. _Famous Shoe_ (1891), 47 Fed. Rep., 411; _Merriam_
v. _Texas Siftings_ (1892), 49 Fed. Rep., 944.
[1645] _Dodd_ v. _Smith_ (1891), 144 Pa., 340.
[1646] _Black_ v. _Ehrich_ (1891), 44 Fed. Rep., 793.
[1647] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Little_ v. _Hall_
(1855), 18 How., 165; _Bartlett_ v. _Crittenden_ (1847), 4 M'L., 301;
_Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532.
[1648] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Jones_ v. _Thoms_
(1843), 1 N. Y. Leg. Obs., 408; _French_ v. _Maguire_ (1878), 55 How.
(N. Y.) Pr., 471; _Oertel_ v. _Wood_ (1870), 40 How. Pr., 10; _Oertel_
v. _Jacoby_ (1872), 44 How., 179; _Rees_ v. _Peltzer_ (1874), 75 Ill.,
475; _Crowe_ v. _Aiken_ (1870), 2 Biss., 208; _Carte_ v. _Bailey_
(1874), 64 Maine, 458.
[1649] _Wheaton_ v. _Peters_ (1834), 8 Pet., 591; _Palmer_ v. _De
Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532; _Goldmark_ v. _Kreling_ (1885), 25 Fed.
Rep., 349; _Daly_ v. _Walrath_ (1899), 40 App. Div. N. Y., 220; 28
Chic. Leg. News, 49.
[1650] See p. 262, _supra_.
[1651] _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., 537.
[1652] See p. 263, _supra_.
[1653] _Oertel_ v. _Wood_ (1870), 40 How. Pr., 10; _Oertel_ v.
_Jacoby_ (1872), 44 How. Pr., 179.
[1654] _Tompkins_ v. _Halleck_ (1882), 133 Mass., 32; overruling
_Keene_ v. _Kimball_ (1860), 16 Gray, 549; see _French_ v. _Maguire_
(1878), 55 How. (N. Y.) Pr., 471; _Crowe_ v. _Aiken_ (1870), 2 Biss.,
208.
[1655] _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532.
[1656] Act of March 3, 1891, sec. 9, amending Revised Statutes, 4967.
[1657] _Press_ v. _Munroe_ (1896), 73 Fed. Rep., 196.
[1658] _Palmer_ v. _De Witt_ (1872), 47 N. Y., 532.
[1659] Ibid.
[1660] _Parton_ v. _Prang_ (1872), 3 Cliff., 537.
[1661] See pp. 152-4.
[1662] Repealed by the Public Authorities Protection Act, 1893 (56 &
57 Vict. c. 61).
[1663] Repealed by Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1867.
[1664] Repealed by Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1887.
[1665] Ibid.
[1666] Repealed by Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1867.
[1667] Ibid.
[1668] Repealed by The Public Authorities Protection Act, 1893.
[1669] See p. 61.
[1670] 41 Geo. III., c. 107, extends the privileges of this Act to
Dublin.
[1671] See p. 61.
[1672] See p. 61.
[1673] This section is repealed by the Public Authorities Protection
Act, 1893, and the provisions of that Act substituted therefor in so
far as they may be held to apply.
[1674] A "full and reasonable indemnity" is substituted by 5 & 6 Vict.
c. 97, sec. 2. These words in the above section printed in italics
were subsequently repealed by Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1861.
[1675] See p. 161.
[1676] See p. 162.
[1677] A "full and reasonable indemnity" is substituted by 5 & 6 Vict.
c. 97, sec. 2.
[1678] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1873 (1).
[1679] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890 (2).
[1680] See p. 123.
[1681] See p. 139.
[1682] See p. 135.
[1683] See p. 126.
[1684] See p. 142.
[1685] A "full and reasonable indemnity" substituted by 5 & 6 Vict. c.
97, sec. 2. See p. 144.
[1686] See p. 57.
[1687] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890.
[1688] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1888 (2).
[1689] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 97, sec. 2, substitutes "a full and reasonable
indemnity."
[1690] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act 1890 (2). See p. 13.
[1691] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1874 (2).
[1692] See p. 10.
[1693] See pp. 36, 148.
[1694] See p. 12.
[1695] See p. 123.
[1696] See p. 74.
[1697] See p. 38.
[1698] See pp. 42, 62.
[1699] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890 (2).
[1700] See p. 119.
[1701] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890 (2).
[1702] See p. 55.
[1703] See p. 56.
[1704] See pp. 47, 49-53.
[1705] See p. 53.
[1706] See p. 46.
[1707] See p. 78.
[1708] See p. 54.
[1709] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1893 (1).
[1710] Ibid.
[1711] Ibid.
[1712] Ibid.
[1713] See p. 85.
[1714] See pp. 75, 77, 118.
[1715] See p. 92.
[1716] See p. 91.
[1717] Ibid.
[1718] See p. 66.
[1719] See p. 67.
[1720] See p. 68.
[1721] Ibid.
[1722] There may be joint employers. See p. 71.
[1723] See p. 71.
[1724] See p. 72.
[1725] See pp. 49-53.
[1726] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1890 (2).
[1727] See p. 131.
[1728] See p. 67.
[1729] See p. 131.
[1730] See p. 135.
[1731] See p. 89.
[1732] See p. 47.
[1733] See p. 133.
[1734] The whole of section 26 is repealed by the Public Authorities
Protection Act, 1893, in so far as that Act applies. The result is
probably that the first part of the section, printed in italics, is
entirely repealed. The second part of the section is probably not
repealed except in respect of actions against a person or body for
acts done in performance of a public duty.
[1735] See p. 91.
[1736] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1874.
[1737] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1891.
[1738] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1874 (2).
[1739] Repealed International Copyright Act, 1886, sec. 12.
[1740] Ibid.
[1741] Ibid.
[1742] See pp. 41, 128, 151, 162, 168.
[1743] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1874 (2).
[1744] Usually known as The Foreign Reprints Act. See p. 187.
[1745] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1891.
[1746] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1875.
[1747] Repealed; Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks Act, 1883.
[1748] Ibid.
[1749] Works produced in the following countries received protection
under this Act. The dates appended are the dates of the respective
Orders in Council: France, Order in Council, dispensed with; Prussia,
Oct. 19, 1855; Belgium, Feb. 8, 1855; Italy, Sept. 9, 1865; Sardinia,
Feb. 4, 1861; Spain, Sept. 24, 1857; Nov. 20, 1880.
[1750] Secs. I.-V. repealed; Int. Copyright Act, 1886, sec. 12.
[1751] Sec. VIII. is repealed: Int. Cop. Act, 1886, sec. 12.
[1752] See p. 170.
[1753] See p. 167.
[1754] See p. 181.
[1755] See p. 174.
[1756] See p. 175.
[1757] See p. 171.
[1758] See p. 179.
[1759] Ibid.
[1760] See p. 180.
[1761] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1893 (1).
[1762] Ibid.
[1763] See p. 178.
[1764] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1893 (2).
[1765] See p. 188.
[1766] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1893 (2).
[1767] See p. 91.
[1768] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1898.
[1769] See p. 131.
[1770] Repealed Copyright (Musical Compositions) Act, 1888.
[1771] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1898.
[1772] See p. 197.
[1773] See pp. 40, 187, 191; 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec. 19.
[1774] See p. 186.
[1775] Repealed Stat. Law Rev. Act, 1898.
[1776] See p. 144.
[1777] See p. 201.
[1778] Those portions of the Convention printed in italics have been
altered by the Additional Act of Paris, 1896. Norway, although a
signatory of the Convention, has not acceded to the Additional Act.
[1779] See paragraph 2 of Final Protocol.
[1780] See paragraph 4 of Final Protocol.
[1781] See paragraph 5 of Final Protocol.
[1782] The following countries subsequently acceded to the Berne
Convention and joined the Copyright Union. By various Orders in
Council of the respective dates given hereunder the provisions of the
International Copyright Acts and of the above Order in Council were
extended to the acceding countries, viz.:
Luxembourg, August 10, 1888; Monaco, October 15, 1889; Montenegro, May
11, 1893; Norway, August 1, 1896; Japan, August 8, 1899.
Montenegro subsequently seceded August 9, 1899.
[1783] All the Orders in Council under the International Copyright
Acts, 1844 and 1852.
[1784] The following countries subsequently acceded to the Additional
Act of Paris. By Orders in Council of the respective dates given
hereunder the provisions of the above Order in Council are extended to
the acceding countries, viz.:
Haiti, May 19, 1898; Japan, August 8, 1899. Montenegro subsequently
seceded August 9, 1899.
[1785] See p. 60.
[1786] Not to include labels. Act of Congress, June 18, 1874, sec. 3.
[1787] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 1.
[1788] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 2.
[1789] Omission to deposit copies, description, or photographs within
the prescribed time could have been rectified by deposit before March
1, 1893: Act of Congress, March 3, 1893.
[1790] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 3.
[1791] _Amended Act of Congress, June_ 18, 1874, _sec. 2._
[1792] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 4.
[1793] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 5.
[1794] Act of Congress, June 18, 1874, substitutes "upon some visible
portion thereof, or of the substance upon which the same shall be
mounted." Act of Congress, August 1, 1882, provides that in the case
of designs for decorative articles the notice may be put on the back
or bottom, &c.
[1795] Act of Congress, June 18, 1874, provides an alternative form of
notice.
[1796] _Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 6._ Further amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March
3, 1897.
[1797] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 7.
[1798] _Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 8._ Further amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March
2, 1895.
[1799] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, January 6, 1897.
[1800] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891,
sec. 9.
[1801] Repealed by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 10.
[1802] Superseded by Act of Congress, March 3, 1891, sec. 4.
[1803] Omission to deposit copies, description, or photographs within
the prescribed time could have been rectified by deposit before March
1, 1893: Act of Congress, March 3, 1893.
[1804] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 3, 1897.
[1805] Amended section substituted by Act of Congress, March 2, 1895.
[Transcriber's Note:
Inconsistent spelling as in the original.
Punctuation normalised throughout.]