PERIOD II.

_Comprehending the_ TESTIMONY _of the same_ CULDEES, _with that of the_

LOLLARDS.

The following period was that fatal one, that brought in universal

darkness on the face of the whole church of Christ, and on Scotland with

the first of them: which, as it received very early Christianity, so it

was with the first corrupted with antichristianism: for that mystery of

iniquity that had been long working, till he who letted was taken out of

the way, found Scotland ripe for it when he came; which, while the

dragon did persecute the woman in the wilderness, did valiantly repel

his assaults; but when the beast did arise, to whom he gave his power,

he prevailed more by his subtilty, than his rampant predecessor could do

by his rage. Scotland could resist the Roman legions while heathenish,

but not the Roman locusts when antichristian. At his very first

appearance in the world, under the character of antichrist, his

harbinger Palladius brought in prelacy to Scotland, and by that

conveyance the contagion of popery, which hath always been, as every

where, so especially in Scotland, both the mother and daughter, cause

and effect, occasion and consequence of popery. These rose, stood and

lived together, and sometimes did also fall together; and we have ground

to hope that they shall fall again; and their final and fatal fall is

not far off. Whatever difficulty authors do make, in calculating the

epocha of the forty-two months of antichrist's duration in the world,

because of the obscurity of his first rise; yet there needs not be much

perplexity in finding out that epocha in Scotland, nor so much

discouragement from the fancied permanency of that kingdom of

wickedness. For if it be certain, as it will not be much disputed, that

popery and prelacy came in by Palladius, sent legate by Pope Celestine,

about the year 450; then if we add forty-two months, or 1260 prophetical

days, that is, years, we may have a comfortable prospect of their

tragical conclusion. And though both clashings and combinations,

oppositions and conjunctions, this day may seem to have a terrible

aspect, portending a darker hour before the dawning; yet all these

reelings and revolutions, though they be symptoms of wrath incumbent

upon us for our sins, they may be looked upon, through a prospect of

faith, as presages and prognostics of mercy impendent for his name's

sake, encouraging us, when we see these dreadful things come to pass in

our day, to lift up our heads, for the day of our redemption draweth

nigh. This dark period continued nigh about 1100 years, in which, though

Christ's witnesses were very few, yet he had some witnessing and

prophesying in sackcloth all the while. Their testimony was the same

with that of the Waldenses and Albigenses, stated upon the grounds of

their secession, or rather abstraction from that mystery Babylon, mother

of harlots, popery and prelacy, for their corruption in doctrine,

worship, discipline and government. And did more particularly relate to

the concerns of Christ's priestly office, which was transmitted from the

Culdees to the Lollards, and by them handed down to the instruments of

reformation in the following period. Their testimony indeed was not

active, by way of forcible resistance against the sovereign powers; but

passive, by way of confession and martyrdom, and sufferings and verbal

contendings, and witnessings against the prevailing corruptions of the

time. And no wonder it should be so, and in this someway different from

ours, because that was a dispensation of suffering, when antichrist was

on the ascendant, and they had no call or capacity to oppose him any

other way, and were new spirited for this passive testimony, in which

circumstances they are an excellent pattern for imitation, but not an

example for confutation of that principle of defensive resistance, which

they never contradicted, and had never occasion to confirm by their

practice. But, as in their managing their testimony, their manner was

someway different from ours on this respect; so they had by far the

advantage of us, that their cause was so clearly stated upon the

greatest heads of sufferings, having the clearest connexion with the

fundamentals of religion; yet we shall find in this period our heads of

suffering someway homologated, if we consider,

I. That as they did faithfully keep and contend for the word of Christ's

patience under that dispensation, in asserting and maintaining both the

verity of Christ's doctrine, and the purity of his worship, by

testifying against the corruptions, errors, idolatries and superstitions

of popery; so they did constantly bear witness against the usurpation

and tyrannical domination of the antichristian prelates. And as the

Culdees did vigorously oppose their first introduction, and after

aspiring domination, as well as the corruptions of their doctrines, as

we have the contendings of eminent witnesses recorded from age to age;

in the fourth and fifth age, Columbe, Libthac, Ethernan, Kintegern or

Mungo; in the sixth and seventh age, Colmanus, Clemens, and Samson, with

others; in the eighth and ninth age, Alcuin, Rabanus, Maurus, Joannes

Scotus AErigena, are noted in history. And the Lollards, by their

examinations and testimonies, are found to have witnessed against the

exercise of their power, and sometimes against the very nature of their

power itself: so in their practice they condemned prelacy as well as

popery, in that their ministers did in much painfulness, poverty,

simplicity, humility, and equality, observe the institution of our Lord.

And so far as their light served, and had occasion to enquire into this

point, they acknowledged no officer in the house of God superior to a

preaching minister, and according to this standard, they rejected and

craved reformation of exorbitant prelacy. And it is plain, that they

were frequently discovered by discountenancing and withdrawing from

their superstitious and idolatrous worship; for all which, when they

could not escape nor repel their violence, they cheerfully embraced and

endured the flames.

II. That their adversaries did manage their cruel craft, and crafty

cruelty, in murdering those servants of God, much after the same methods

that ours do; except that they are many stages outdone by their

successors; as much as perfect artists do outstrip the rude beginnings

of apprentices. But, on the other hand, the sufferers in our day, that

would follow the example of those worthies under Popery, would be much

condemned by this generation, even by them that commend the matter of

their testimony, though they will not allow the manner of it to be

imitated in this day. The adversaries of Christ, in this and that

generation, are more like than his confessors and witnesses are. The

adversaries then, when constrained by diversions of the time's troubles,

or when their designs were not ripe, pretended more moderation and

aversation from severity; but no sooner got they opportunity, (which

always they sought), but so soon they renewed the battle against Jesus

Christ; so now: when they had seven abominations in their hearts, and

many cursed designs in their heads, they always spoke fairest; so now:

when they had a mind to execute their cruelty, they would resolve before

hand whom to pitch upon before conviction; so now: and when so resolved,

the least pretence of a fault, obnoxious to their wicked law, would

serve their design; so now: they used then to forge articles, and

falsely misrepresent their answers, and declarations of their

principles; so now. Yet, on the other hand, if now poor sufferers should

glory in that they are counted worthy to suffer shame for the name of

Christ, as they did then; if now they should suffer with as great

chearfulness, for the smallest points as for the greatest heads, as they

did then, who endured the flames as gallantly, for eating a goose upon

Friday, as others did for the doctrine of justification, or purgatory,

or indulgences, or worshipping of images and saints; if now they should

speak for every truth in question, with all simplicity and plainness,

without reserves or shifts declining a testimony, as they did; if they

should supersede from all application to their enemies for favour, and

not meddle with either petitioning or bonding with them, as they did;

nay, not accepting deliverance, that they might obtain a better

resurrection: then they might expect the severe censure of ignorant and

precise fools, as the most part who suffer now are counted.

III. That they stood aloof from every appearance of a base compliance

with them; not so much as to give them an interpretative sign of it;

which, in their meaning, might be thought a recantation, though,

abstractly considered, it might be capable of a more favourable

construction; as the required burning of their bill was; which might

have been thought a condemning of their accusations; but because that

was not their adversaries sense of it, they durst not do it. Not like

many now a-days, who will not be solicitous to consult that. Neither

would they take any of their oaths, nor pay any of their ecclesiastical

exactions, as we find in the articles brought in against the Lollards of

Kyle, Knox's History of Reformation. These things are easily complied

with now: and such as will suffer upon such things are condemned.

IV. That while the love of God and his blessed truth, and the precepts,

promise, and presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, did enable them unto all

patience with joy, in a passive testimony, being by the call of a clear

and necessary providence sent and set forth to be his witnesses; they

did not indeed endeavour any resistance: yet we find they never resigned

nor abandoned that first and most just privilege of resistance; nay, nor

bringing public beasts of prey to condign punishment, in an

extraordinary way of vindictive justice, for the murder of the saints.

As, upon the murder of Mr. George Wishart, was done with Cardinal

Beaton, who was slain in the tower of St. Andrew's by James Melvin: who,

perceiving his consorts in the enterprize moved with passion, withdrew

them, and said, 'This work and judgment of God, although it be secret,

ought to be done with greater gravity.' And, presenting the point of the

sword to the Cardinal, said, 'Repent thee of thy former wicked life, but

especially of the shedding of the blood of that notable instrument of

God, Mr. George Wishart, which albeit the flame of fire consumed before

men, yet it cries for vengeance upon thee, and we from God are sent to

revenge it; for here, before my God, I protest, that neither the hatred

of thy person, the love of thy riches, nor the fear of any trouble thou

couldst have done me in particular, moved or moveth me to strike thee,

but only because thou hast been and remainest an obstinate enemy against

Christ Jesus, and his holy gospel.' Of which fact, the famous and

faithful historian Mr. Knox speaks very honourably, and was so far from

condemning it, that while, after the slaughter, they kept out the

castle, he, with other godly men, went to them, and stayed with them,

till they were together carried captives to France. Yet now such a fact,

committed upon such another bloody and treacherous beast, the Cardinal

Prelate of Scotland, eight years ago, is generally condemned as horrid

murder.

V. However, though in this dark period there be no noted instances of

these witnesses resisting the superior powers, for reasons above hinted:

yet, in this period, we find many instances of noble and virtuous

patriots, their not only resisting, but also revenging to the utmost of

severity, rigorous and raging tyrants, as may be seen in histories. For,

before the corruption of antichrist came to its height, we find

Ferchardus 1st, the 52d King, was drawn to judgment against his will,

great crimes were laid to his charge, and among others the Pelagian

heresy, and contempt of baptism, for which he was cast into prison,

where he killed himself in the year 636; Eugenius 8th, the 62d King,

degenerating into wickedness, and rejecting the admonitions of his

friends, and especially of the ministers, was killed in a convention of

his nobles, with the consent of all, in the year 765; Donaldus 7th was

imprisoned, where he killed himself, in the year 859; Ethus, surnamed

Alipes, the 72d King, was apprehended, and his wicked life laid out

before the people, and then compelled to resign the government, and died

in prison, in the year 875. Afterwards when the government was

transmitted to the Stewarts, James the 2d, the 103d King, who killed

William Earl of Douglas in the castle of Stirling, most treacherously,

after he had pretended a civil treatment, was publicly defied by the

Earl's friends, who took the King's public writ and subscription made to

the said Earl, and tied it to a horse tail, dragging it through the

streets; and, when they came to the market-place, they proclaimed both

King and Nobles perjured covenant breakers; and thereafter, when Earl

James his brother was desired to submit, he answered, 'He would never

put himself in their reverence who had no regard to shame; nor to the

laws of God or man, and who had so perfidiously killed his brother and

his cousins.' James 3d, the 104th King, for his treachery and tyranny,

was opposed and pursued by arms by his own subjects; who, finding

himself under disadvantages, sent to the rebels (as he thought them, and

called them) an offer of peace, and received this answer--'That seeing

the King did nothing honestly, a certain war seemed better to them than

a peace not to be trusted, that there was no other hope of agreement but

one, that he should quit the government, otherwise it was to no purpose

to trouble themselves with treaties.' Thereafter, in a battle, he was

slain at Bannockburn by Gray, Ker, and Borthwick. The same King was also

constrained, by the valour of Archibald Douglas Earl of Angus, called

Bell the Cat, to reform the court, and put away some wicked sycophants

from his council, and give way, though against his will, to the

execution of judgment upon others: which was the occasion of that

foresaid agnomen to the Earl: for he, with other nobles, in a meeting at

Lauder, consulting how to reform and repress the insolency of the Court,

had the apologue of the mice laid out before them; that the mice fell

upon deliberating how to be rid of the cat, and concluded that the best

way was to put a bell about her neck; but when it came to be put in

execution, never a mouse durst undertake it: the Earl quickly made

application, saying, I will bell the cat; and forthwith went out, and

meeting Cochran, one of these wicked counsellors, took hold of him, and

hanged him with a horse halter over the bridge of Lauder; and, rushing

into the King's presence, proceeded to snatch Ramsay, another of the

country's enemies, out of the King's arms; but that he yielded at length

to the King's earnest entreaties to spare him. However we see how

generously zealous these noble patriots were for the country's good,

against tyranny, though they were ignorant of religion: yet this all

along was still the character of the Scots in these days, none more

terrible to tyrants, none more loyal to Kings than they.

A Hind Let Loose Or, An Historical Representation of the Testimonies of the Church of Scotland for the Interest of Christ. With the True State Thereof in All Its Periods · 第 25 / 47 题