CHAPTER XIII

_Liberty at Last_

It was not until some five-and-thirty years after the tragic death of

'the Saviour of Brussels' that the common folk of that city at last

definitely obtained a direct voice in its government.

It was the old story. As it had been at Louvain so was it in the sister

city: the patricians were divided amongst themselves, that was the cause

of their overthrow. But if it was the old story, it was the old story

differently told. At Louvain the cruelty and oppression of the ruling

class and, above all, their incapacity and corruption, had sickened the

people of aristocratic rule and they were ripe for revolt. A little band

of patricians, partly from philanthropic motives, partly from private

spleen, espoused the popular cause and placed themselves at its head;

the Duke, for his own ends, connived at their proceedings, and after a

long and bloody struggle the result was, as we have seen, victory.

At Brussels it was otherwise. When the craftsmen of Brussels at last

obtained their hearts' desire, they had lived under an honest and

capable government for at least fifty years, and if they had no voice in

the legislature, they held the purse-strings and were thus indirectly

able to make their influence felt, nor were they altogether excluded

from offices of trust and emolument; and though, no doubt, they had not

abandoned the hope of one day obtaining direct representation in the

municipal senate, they seem to have so far acquiesced in the existing

state of things that they had no thought of taking violent measures to

change it. They were content to possess their souls in patience, and

they were not defrauded of their expectation. By-and-by the fascinating

dream of ages was a reality, and this was how it came about.

All that was best and all that was noblest in the three estates of

Brabant had joined hands against the Sovereign--a wanton boy led astray

by evil counsellors, who were squandering his wealth and the wealth of

his towns, and suffering the honour of Brabant to be dragged in the

dust; and when all seemed lost, when Brussels, betrayed by false

brethren, was filled with German mercenaries breathing out threatening

and slaughter, the energy and daring of the despised craftsmen had

turned defeat into victory. And when the battle was won and the land

once more had rest, these men received, by way of guerdon, the boon they

had so long craved for.

The skein of the story is a long and intricate one, but it is worth the

trouble of disentangling. It was during the reign of Duke John IV. that

these things happened. John was a scion of the house of Bourgogne, which

at this time was supreme in the Low Country, and as the events which we

are about to relate were in large measure the outcome of the ambitious

designs and selfish schemes of the Burgundians, it will be well for a

moment to consider their origin and the means by which they mounted to

power.[18]

[18] _See_ Genealogical Table IV.

The founder of the house was Philip of Valois, surnamed the Bold, a

younger son of King John of France, and, like many other great houses,

Court favour and a fortunate marriage were the foundation stones on

which it was built.

Marguerite of Maele, the childless widow of her kinsman Philip of

Rouvre, the last Duke of Burgundy of the old stock, was at this time the

most to be desired of the marriageable princesses of Europe: she was

young, beautiful, rich, heiress-apparent to the Counties of Flanders,

Burgundy, Rethel, Artois and Nevers, and the only representative of the

third generation of Duke John III. of Brabant. Among the princes who

aspired to her hand was Philip of Valois, on whom, shortly after the

death of her husband (1361), last of his race in the direct line, the

French King had conferred his duchy (1363). After long and tedious

negotiations and much haggling, for the Count of Flanders, her father,

and the King of France, who conducted them, regarded one another with

mutual distrust, the marriage treaty was signed (April 25, 1369), and in

due course the widow of the last Duke of Burgundy of the old stock

became the wife of the first Duke of the new dynasty (June 19, 1369).

A momentous marriage this, and one of which the consequences were far

reaching. By it were presently united--when Louis of Maele died (January

30, 1384)--the two most formidable fiefs of the French crown; and the

man who held them, a man of marvellous parts and vast ambition,

unscrupulous, cunning, bold, had all the prestige of a prince of the

blood, and, as the King's most trusted counsellor, all the resources of

France at his back.

IV.--Genealogical Table of the Dukes of Brabant from

John III. to Philip II.

$John III.$, _d._ Dec. 5, 1355

|

+----------+----------+--------+--------------------------------+

| | | |

Henry, Godfrey, $Jeanne$, = Winceslaus of Luxembourg, |

_d._ 1349 _d._ 1351 _d._ Dec. 1406 _d._ Dec. 8, 1383 |

|

|

Louis of Maele, Count of Flanders, _d._ Jan. 30, 1384 = Marguerite

(he inherited at the death of his mother, |

Marguerite, daughter of Philip V. of France, 1382, |

the Counties of Burgundy and Artois) |

|

+----------------------------------+

|

Philip of Rouvre, = Marguerite, = Philip of Valois, 4th son of John II.

Duke of Burgundy _d._ March | of France, who conferred on him

and Count of 16, 1405 | the Duchy of Burgundy in 1363,

Burgundy | _d._ April 27, 1404

(Franche-Comté) |

and Artois, _d._ 1361 |

+-------------------------+-----------------------------+----+

| | |

John the Fearless, Count of Flanders, = Marguerite, | |

Burgundy, etc., on the death of his | only daughter of | |

mother (1405), Duke of Burgundy on | Albert, Count of | |

the death of his father (1404), | Hainault and | |

resigned his interest in the Duchy of | Holland, | |

Brabant in favour of his brother | _d._ Jan 14, 1423 | |

Anthony, _d._ Sept. 10, 1419 | | |

| | |

+-------------------------------+ | |

| | |

| +------------------------------------------------+ |

| | |

| | +-----------------------+

| Marguerite = William, eldest son |

| _d._ March | of Albert, Count of |

| 8, 1441 | Hainault and Holland |

| | _d._ May 31, 1417 |

| | |

| | Jeanne de = $Anthony$, = Elizabeth = John the

| | Saint-Pol | _d._ Oct. of Goerlitz Pitiless,

| | daughter | 25, 1415 second son

| | of Waleran | of Albert

| | of | of Holland

| | Luxembourg | _d._ 1425

| | +-----------------+

| | |

| +-------+ +------+--------+

| | | |

| | | |

$Philip II.$ Jacqueline, Countess of = $John IV.$, |

(Philippe Hainault and Holland, _d._ April 17, |

l'Asseuré), abdicated 1433, 1427 |

Duke of _d._ April 9, 1436 |

Burgundy, |

Count of Burgundy, $Philip I.$

and Count of Flanders (Philippe de

from 1423, Duke of Saint-Pol),

Brabant from 1430, _d._ Aug. 4, 1430

and Count of Hainault

and Holland from 1433

It was thanks, indeed, to this last mighty asset that Philip was able to

prepare the way for the union of the Netherlands to the profit of his

own house. His intimate connection with France obtained for him the

friendship of Duchess Jeanne, always French in her sympathies, and

through her good offices he was able to marry his eldest son, John the

Fearless, and his eldest daughter, Marguerite, to the only daughter and

the eldest son of Albert of Bavaria, heir-apparent to Hainault, Holland

and Zeeland, and thus to secure these counties for one of his

descendants. The double marriage took place on the 12th of April 1385,

and it will be interesting to note that the prelate who gave the nuptial

blessing was no other than John T'Serclaes, Count Bishop of Cambrai, a

brother of 'the liberator of Brussels.' Again, when shortly after the

death of Duke Winceslaus (1385) war broke out between Brabant and

Gelderland, and Jeanne, hard pressed, appealed to Philip for aid, it was

with French troops and French gold that he was able to effectually help

her, and thus to inspire--his main object in complying with her

request--those sentiments of gratitude which later on, in 1390, induced

her to acknowledge the right of her sister's child, Marguerite of Maele,

to the reversion of her ancestral domains, and that, in spite of a

previous engagement: in 1357, when smarting under the insult of the

Flemish invasion, the work, as Jeanne firmly believed, of that same

sister, she had pledged her word to the Emperor Charles IV., her

husband's elder brother, that if she died childless her estate should

not go to Marguerite of Brabant or to her issue, but to Charles himself,

or, in his default, to his next-of-kin of the house of Luxembourg.

Thus much had French influence and French gold accomplished for the Duke

of Burgundy, but he was not yet sure of obtaining the prize which he so

much coveted. The burghers had something to say in the matter, and

sentiments of gratitude and the glamour of France had little influence

with them: they feared that the house of Burgundy would be too powerful

for the security of their privileges; and also they were being pressed

by Wenzel, King of the Romans, who claimed the reversion of Jeanne's

heritage in virtue of the compact of 1357, to make a declaration in his

favour. To neither claimant would they give a definite reply: it were

time enough, they said, to consider the matter after Jeanne's decease.

They were no doubt waiting to see which man would make the highest bid.

At last Philip cut the knot by compelling his eldest son John to

renounce his right to the succession in favour of his second son Anthony

(1393), whom Jeanne, in 1401, with the assent of her people, formally

acknowledged as her heir.

Nor was this all. At a meeting which took place at Paris, whither Jeanne

had gone (1396) to see once more before she died 'the Princes of the

_Fleurs-de-lis_,' she had arranged with Philip that young Anthony, now

twelve years old, should reside with her at Brussels in order that he

might thus learn to know the people over whom he would one day rule. No

small advantage: if anything should happen to Jeanne, who was now

seventy-four years of age, Anthony would be on the spot; but as weeks

turned into months and months into years, and still the old Duchess

clung to life, Philip began to tire of waiting and to wonder whether

after all the cup would be dashed from his hands as he was carrying it

to his lips.--If only Jeanne could be induced to abdicate, Anthony, who

was now nineteen, could at once grasp the reins of government.

Determined, if possible, to induce her to do so, he journeyed to

Brussels early in April 1404, and once more his efforts were crowned

with success.

[Illustration: Notre-Dame de Hal from Chapel behind North Transept]

It was his last triumph. In the midst of a sumptuous banquet (April 16,

1404) in honour of his son's inauguration as Regent of Brabant, he was

struck down by a fever which was at that time raging in the city. On the

ninth day after his seizure, when he was almost a dead man, at his own

request they carried him on a litter to Hal and lodged him at the Sign

of the Stag, hard by the church, then famous, as it is now, for its

miraculous image of Our Lady. He knew that he was past human aid, yet

haply, he thought, the prayers of the Mother of God might even now save

him; but the Angel of Death was inexorable, and towards nightfall on the

morrow the great founder of the house of Bourgogne passed quietly away

(April 27, 1404). His body was embalmed and carried to Dijon, and they

buried it in the Carthusian monastery which he himself had founded

there, but his heart was enclosed in a precious casket and laid up

before the altar of Our Lady at Hal.

Death was at this time busy with the great ones of the Netherlands.

Within eight months of Philip's demise (December 12, 1404), Albert of

Hainault and Holland was gathered to his fathers and his son William

reigned in his stead; shortly before the new Count's accession,

Marguerite de Bourgogne had given him a daughter (July 25, 1401),

Jacqueline, famed for her beauty and her misfortunes, whose tragic story

we shall presently tell. Three months later Marguerite of Maele joined

her husband, and their eldest son, _Jean sans Peur_, who the year before

had inherited from his father the county of Charolais and the duchy of

Burgundy, now added to his possessions the county of Burgundy and the

counties of Flanders and Artois. A personage to be reckoned with, this

little, huge-headed, flat-faced man, without grace and without address,

and who spoke so ill that his speech was almost unintelligible: he knew

what he wanted and he knew how to compass his ends; he had subtlety and

determination, and was untroubled with scruples. He strengthened his

bulwarks if he did not enlarge his borders, and he struck his roots deep

into the soil of the Netherlands; but the greatest thing he did for the

accomplishment of their union was to beget a son, to whom he

transmitted his great capabilities, if not his evil looks, and who

gathered in the harvest which his father and his grandfather had

sown--Philip, second of his name, whom men called the Good, a sort of

fifteenth century imperialist, whose acquaintance we shall make later

on.

On the 1st of December 1406, full of years and good works, died Duchess

Jeanne. She was the last of her generation, and the liberal traditions

of the house of Louvain died with her. She had outlived the man who had

so long plotted for her heritage well-nigh three years, and, as she had

wished, she was succeeded by her great-nephew Anthony. Though a brave

and chivalrous prince, his ideals were not the ideals of his subjects,

and in consequence he was always at loggerheads with them, but when he

was gathered to his fathers, struck down at Agincourt (October 25,

1415),[19] the evil days of his son John made Anthony regretted. Not

that John was a vicious man, but he was physically and morally weak--_de

petite et foible complexion_, as his secretary and intimate friend De

Dynter has it; and Chastelain: '_Peu estoit enclin au harnois, et avec

ce de féminin gouvernement, car en lui avoit peu de fait et peu de

malice. Et pour ce, aucuns estant entour luy, qui le réoient simple, le

gouvernèrent à leur prouffit et peu au sien, ne à ses pays._'[20] Herein

we have the source of the difficulties which continually beset his path,

difficulties of all kinds and with all sorts and conditions of

persons--with his clergy, his nobles, his burghers, his common folk,

and, within his own domestic circle, with his brother, his mother-in-law

and his wife. She was the greatest difficulty of all, and it would have

been marvellous indeed if his marriage had proved a happy one. What

could there have been in common with the indolent, feeble, dull-witted

John of Brabant and his brilliant and beautiful cousin Jacqueline, who

had inherited, with the shrewdness and the masterful will, all the

energy and all the daring of her mother's ambitious race? No more

ill-assorted match could well have been devised than that which William

of Holland urged with his last breath on his only daughter, the apple of

his eye, who at that time was a child-widow of sixteen. With his body

gangrened from the bite of a dog, and his mind confused with horror and

grief at the foul deed which six weeks before had deprived Jacqueline of

a husband, the dying man saw a pillar of strength in his poor little

rickety nephew. He knew that when he was gone she would need a

protector; he dreaded the cruel ambition of his brother, the Bishop of

Liége, who, he fondly believed, would hurl himself in vain against the

bedrock of the house of Bourgogne. Jacqueline herself had no such

illusion, her cousin of Brabant was known to her, her eyes were not

blinded by the glamour of his race, and she was convinced he would prove

a sorry champion. Moreover, she had loved the Dauphin, her first

husband, with whom she had been brought up, and the tragic circumstances

of his death--poisoned, as all men believed, by his uncle of

Orléans--had embittered her grief at his loss, and made her the less

inclined to hurry again into wedlock. But for all that the marriage took

place: the family council, held shortly after William's death at

Biervliet, in Zeeland (July 31, 1417), was unanimously in favour of it,

and in spite of her reluctance, and in spite of the opposition from

interested motives of the Bishop of Liége, the hapless Jacqueline was

presently constrained to give her hand to the poor stripling whom she

loathed.

[19] _See_ p. 289.

[20] _Chronique du Duc Philippe_, chap. lv.

On Sunday, the 1st of August 1417, John and Jacqueline publicly

plighted their troth, and it was arranged that they should be united in

wedlock as soon as the necessary dispensation could be obtained from the

Holy See. A matter this not easy of accomplishment, owing to the

opposition of the Bishop of Liége, who naturally objected to a marriage

intended to prevent his making good his claim to his niece's heritage,

to which he maintained he had the better right--Holland and Hainault, as

imperial fiefs, being not transmissible in the female line.

This man at the family council, dissembling his real intentions, had not

only acknowledged Jacqueline's right to the whole of her father's

dominions and approved of the proposed match, but had actually

volunteered himself to procure the requisite dispensation, and

afterwards he had prevailed on the men of Dordrecht to receive him as

their Sovereign; and from thence, on the 3rd of September, he had

secretly sent letters to Constance representing to the Fathers assembled

there for the purpose of electing a new Pontiff and other matters, that

if this incestuous union were sanctioned the country would be plunged in

civil war.

Appointed to the See of Liége in 1390, a dissolute boy of seventeen in

sub-deacon's orders, in spite of the reiterated protests of his canons

and to the no small scandal of his people, John the Pitiless had

persistently refused episcopal consecration. For a sub-deacon to be

freed from his vow of celibacy he knew was not impossible, perhaps, as

his enemies said, it was in his mind to found a house and convert the

ecclesiastical state over which he presided--a republic then in all but

the name, with a mitred figurehead for president--into a lay

principality to be handed down to his descendants. In any case, he would

preserve a free hand in view of political eventualities. For twelve

years the people waited, groaning under John's oppression, for one

after another he suppressed all their liberties, and shamed by his evil

life, and then, at the end of their patience, they hunted him out of the

town, and chose in his place a worthier man, Thierry, son of the Lord of

Perwys, who in due course received from Benedict XIII. episcopal

consecration. But John the Pitiless was not the man to accept defeat, he

appealed to his brother of Holland and to his brother-in-law of

Burgundy, and after a long and bitter struggle he was presently

reinstated. The last stand was made at Othée, in the plain of Russon, on

the 23rd of September 1408, when the men of Liége were utterly routed.

Amongst the eight thousand slain were Bishop Thierry and his father, the

Lord of Perwys. When all was over they found their dead bodies on the

battlefield, side by side and hand in hand. Better so, for John's fierce

triumph was a veritable orgie of blood. Such of his victims as were

laymen he beheaded or hanged, and he showed his pity for their daughters

and wives and his respect for the ecclesiastical state by casting the

women into the Meuse, and with them the canons whom Thierry had

appointed, and the priests whom he had ordained. Then it was that the

Liége men first called him _Jean sans Pitié_.

Such was the man who now professed himself so solicitous for the purity

of family life and so fearsome lest the loosening of ecclesiastical

discipline should have for its outcome war. But the Fathers of Constance

were in no way deceived by his specious pleading, and as soon as they

had chosen a Pope (Martin V.) the dispensation was accorded. John,

however, was not yet at the end of his resources; as a prudent man he

had taken care to have two strings to his bow: he had not only written

to the Fathers of Constance, but also to his friend the Emperor

Sigismond, who, as soon as he learnt that the brief had been

dispatched, compelled the Pope by threats of imprisonment to revoke it.

Embarrassing this, no doubt, to the agents of the Duke of Brabant, but

they seem to have been equal to the emergency; for the clerks whose duty

it was to affix the pontifical seal to the new rescript, dated

Constance, January 5, 1413, conveniently forgot to do so for several

days, and thus it came about that when at last it reached the interested

parties the marriage had already taken place.

Edmund De Dynter, Duke John's secretary, tells us how it all

happened:--Late on the evening of Thursday, March 10, 1413, the

dispensation arrived at the Hague, where the Courts of Holland and

Brabant and Burgundy had been anxiously awaiting it for over three

weeks. The same night John and Jacqueline privately plighted their

troth, and immediately after the ceremony, says Edmund De Dynter, who

seems to have been present, they were conducted to the bridal chamber.

Doubtless they had some inkling at the Hague of what had taken place at

Constance, but in reality there was no need for haste, the newly-married

couple had time to visit Mons and other towns of Hainault, where their

sovereign rights were acknowledged, and Jacqueline had been welcomed as

Duchess of Brabant at Brussels and Louvain and Bois-le-Duc before the

second rescript was placed in the hands of Duke John. Shortly afterwards

'two venerable masters in theology' arrived at the Coudenberg, where the

Court was now installed, bringing with them a sealed letter from Martin

V. informing John that he might give full credence to what the bearers

said. They told him that as the revocation had been extorted by force,

it was to be regarded as null and void, and that as soon as the Pope had

crossed the Alps and was out of the Emperor's power, he would dispatch a

third rescript confirmatory of the first. And the Pope was as good as

his word: in due course the promised letter arrived, dated Florence,

August 27, 1418.

Though baffled in the matter of his niece's marriage, John the Pitiless

had otherwise strengthened his position. The better to prosecute his

claim to her heritage he had resigned his See, obtained a dispensation

from his vow of celibacy, and married a rich widow--Elizabeth, Duchess

of Luxembourg, step-mother to John of Brabant. Shortly afterwards the

Emperor had publicly invested him with the disputed fiefs, and in

Holland at least, especially among the burghers of the great towns, he

had a very considerable following. Meanwhile he was still at Dordrecht,

and presently he felt himself strong enough to openly declare war

against Jacqueline and her husband.

The Estates of Brabant, well aware that in face of so redoubtable an

adversary half measures would be useless, urged the Duke to attack

Dordrecht by land and sea. John's counsellors, however, were of a

different opinion. The expedition, they said, must be conducted with due

regard to economy, and to expend money on ships were an altogether

unnecessary outlay; and thus it came about that the siege of Dordrecht

very soon had to be raised. John, who had at first taken the field, now

retired to Brussels; city after city and fortress after fortress fell

into the hands of his opponent; Philip of Burgundy, to whom his father,

John the Fearless, absent in Paris, had left the care of his affairs in

the Low Countries, offered his mediation, and a compromise was effected.

On the 13th of February 1419 the Duke of Brabant ceded in fief to John

the Pitiless a portion of his wife's domains, permitted him to take the

title of Regent, and paid him a handsome indemnity into the

bargain--100,000 English nobles.

The burghers of Brabant were enraged and disgusted, and Jacqueline was

beside herself with indignation, the more so as they and she had each a

personal and most intimate grievance against the men whose parsimony had

caused this shame. The burghers never forgot that for years past these

harpies had fattened at their expense, considering neither the interests

of the State, which they starved, nor of the Sovereign, whom they

cajoled and fleeced, for John never failed to apply to his towns

whenever he found himself short of cash; and Jacqueline believed what

was whispered at Court as to how the vilest of them, William of Assche,

erst treasurer of the ducal household, now amman of Brussels, and his

son-in-law, Everard T'Serclaes--the eldest son of the Deliverer--had

obtained the baneful influence which they exercised over her feeble

lord: Assche at the cost of his daughter's fair name, and T'Serclaes at

the sacrifice of his own honour and the honour of his wife. Poor little

John was bewitched seemingly by the charms of Lauretta of Assche, or at

all events Jacqueline thought so, and she was proportionately jealous.

But it was not these men, but that grasping old fox, Treasurer

Vandenberghe, who was the first to experience the people's wrath. 'Ever

swift to sweep in coin, and tardy, yea, of a truth most tardy, in the

matter of payments,'[21] he it was who had been the chief promoter of

the cheese-paring policy which had brought forth such disastrous

results, and hence he was condemned by the Estates to exile, and

declared to be for ever incapable of again holding office in Brabant.

Nor was this all: Brussels and Louvain informed the Duke that they would

grant him no further aid until the sentence had been carried out. It was

the first passage of arms in the great struggle between John and his

_bonnes villes_. The friends of the Duchess had been the first to

strike, but her opponents were not slow to hit back. At Brussels her

arch foe, William Assche, refused, quite illegally, to publish his

colleague's condemnation, but the aldermen made him pay for it: they

would no longer acknowledge him as amman, and flung him into gaol. Of

the whole college one member only withheld his assent--Everard

T'Serclaes, and in consequence he was declared to have forfeited his

rights of _lignage_ and to be for ever incapable of holding municipal

office.

[21] De Dynter, c. 161.

Meanwhile John and the Treasurer had betaken themselves to Mons, where

the latter presently endured a worse punishment than exile: on the 23rd

of March 1419, during the absence of the Duke and the Duchess hawking,

Vandenberghe, sick and slumbering in his chamber, 'was suddenly aroused

by the bastards of Holland' (Jacqueline's natural brothers), 'who very

soon sent him to sleep again, and so soundly that no man shall ever wake

him more; for without any respite they struck him stone dead, and

forthwith went their way.' 'Spite,' says Secretary De Dynter, 'because

he had stopped their pensions'; and Monstrelet adds, 'The Duchess,

according to common report, was a sufficiently consenting party to what

her brethren had done.'

Be this as it may, the removal of Vandenberghe was certainly, for the

moment, of advantage to Jacqueline and her friends. For three days John

was inconsolable, but at the expiration of that time his Duchess managed

to appease him, and Rotslaere, a man devoted to the popular cause, was

appointed Treasurer of Brabant (April 12, 1419). Maybe that John, in

acting thus, was dissembling to gain time; maybe that, brooding over his

wrongs alone (for shortly after the murder the ducal couple had

separated), he was presently impelled to go back on his decision;

certain it is that within a month after their appointment the new

ministers were dismissed.

Before the end of April the Court had returned to Brabant: Jacqueline to

Vilvorde, and John, cast down and restless, flitting from place to

place--sometimes at Tervueren, sometimes at Antwerp, never at Brussels,

where Assche was still in prison, at last he found himself at

Bois-le-Duc, and by that time he had made up his mind.

The 15th of May 1419 was a noteworthy day in the life of Duke John of

Brabant. Between sunrise and sunset he accomplished several things, and

experienced some sensations of a sufficiently varied and exciting nature

for a nervous youth of delicate constitution:--A morning ride from

Bois-le-Duc to Crayenhem, unknown to Rotslaere--_grandement embesogné_,

good man, _et moult esbahis_, when presently he heard of it; a secret

meeting there with former counsellors, at which a plan was devised for

taming Jacqueline; a journey next to Vilvorde, and there, beneath her

windows, insulting proclamation, outcome of the morning conclave; then,

swift flight to Tervueren to escape the consequences; and then--grand

finale, when he flattered himself he had reached cover, the hurricane of

his wife's indignation burst over his head; for Jacqueline, when she saw

her lord departing, had at once taken horse, accompanied by one lady and

three servants, and reaching Tervueren almost before he had recovered

his breath, she forced her way into his chamber in spite of the

remonstrance of the guard, and there, in the presence of his favourites,

rated him soundly for two good hours. And Jacqueline had reason to be

discontented, for Rotslaere and her friends had fallen, and the corrupt

sycophants, who had been the cause of all her miseries, were once more

in power, and, worse still, her own personal attendants--the Dutch

ladies, whom she loved and who had served her all her life--had been

summarily ordered to pack up their baggage and get themselves back to

Holland. And who were the women who were to take their place? 'The

noblest and best in the land,' said John. And no doubt he thought so:

they were the wives and daughters of his boon companions, and amongst

them was Lauretta of Assche.

Though John displayed admirable firmness so long as his wife confined

herself to tears and supplication, he quailed before the bitter

invective which his heartlessness presently called forth; and if it had

not been for his fear of a like scene with Lauretta, maybe the Duchess

would have carried the day. As it was, she was fain to content herself

with her lord's reluctant consent to her retaining four of her women,

and there, for the moment, the affair ended.

Meanwhile matters were not mending at Brussels. Assche was still in

prison, and neither John's threats nor entreaties could induce the

burghers to release him; and presently, when election time came round

and the patricians as usual sent in their triple list of candidates, the

Duke, by way of retaliation, refused to make any appointments, and for

three weeks the city was without magistrates. At last, thanks to the

good offices of Antwerp and Louvain, a compromise was effected, which

was in reality a triumph for Brussels. John, indeed, obtained the

release of his friend, but he was not reinstated in office, and John

Taye, who now became amman, was a _persona grata_ to the burghers. Nor

was this all: the city obtained a new charter, by which it was ordained

that henceforth a deputy amman should always be appointed, who, in the

event of the amman's refusal to act, or if he performed his duties ill,

would be competent to act for him; that if the deputy, in his turn,

failed to give satisfaction, the aldermen could replace him by a more

suitable person; and that if in future any Sovereign should refuse to

appoint magistrates, the outgoing magistrates might themselves name

their successors.

Notwithstanding that peace had thus been patched up between John and the

men of Brussels, his heart was so filled with resentment that he could

not prevail upon himself to return to the Coudenberg till six months

later, and shortly afterwards came the final rupture with Jacqueline.

It happened thus. Hardly a year had passed since the signing of the

Treaty of Gorcum (February 13, 1419), when John the Pitiless, again

growing restive, began to demand fresh concessions and to threaten that

if they were not granted Brabant would be drenched in blood. So eager

was the Duke to avert war that he did not hesitate to invest him with

the regency of Holland and Zeeland for a period of twelve years, and to

cede to him also the lordships of Antwerp and Herenthals--dependencies

these last of the duchy of Brabant.

Whilst Duke John was thus weakly disposing of his own and of his wife's

property, his faithful henchman, Everard T'Serclaes, now steward of the

ducal household, was racking his brains as to how he might rid the Court

of Jacqueline's Dutch ladies. By so doing he would confer a boon on his

master, and, matter of greater moment, gratify his own spleen, for his

hatred of the Duchess was commensurate with the injury which he had done

her, and with the contempt which she openly showed for him. After much

thought, he came to the conclusion that the best plan would be to starve

them out, and under pretext of thrift, for the household expenses, he

said, were extremely heavy, he refused henceforth to make any provision

for their maintenance.

Jacqueline had just heard of the new treaty and was in no mood to brook

further outrage. The meanness and pettiness of this last insult cut her

to the quick, and she resented it with the pride and energy natural to

her character. Marguerite of Burgundy, who had sought out John and

remonstrated with him in vain, had withdrawn in tears to an inn called

_Le Miroir_ in the _rue de la Montagne_, and Jacqueline, after a violent

scene with her husband, fled from the Court to her mother's lodgings. No

effort was made to recall her, and next morning the two ladies left

Brussels for the Castle of Quesnoy in Hainault, where Jacqueline was

still Sovereign. This was early in May 1420.

When it became known that the Duchess had gone, throughout the length

and breadth of the land there was a widespread feeling of indignation,

which, however, seems to have been at first stronger in some places than

in others, and, generally speaking, the rural districts, influenced as

they were by the feudal lords--almost all of them, from sentiments of

chivalry, ardent partisans of Jacqueline, were more hostile than the

towns. At Bois-le-Duc, indeed, John's adherents were sufficiently

numerous and influential to insure the loyalty of the city throughout

the contest which was now impending; Antwerp, for a time, also refrained

from active hostility, and so, too, Brussels. The common folk had

'wondered and wept' when they saw Jacqueline leaving the palace in tears

and on foot, and attended by only one serving-man, and the heartless

boy, who had driven her from home, had long ago forfeited their

confidence and respect, but at Brussels the common folk did not yet

count, and the patricians, though many of them shared their sentiments,

were for the most part loth to quarrel again with their best customer;

for the cloth trade was waning in face of English competition, and the

Court was now the mainstay of their prosperity.

At Louvain it was otherwise. The Dukes of Brabant had long since

forsaken the cradle of their race, the tradesmen of the capital had

little to gain and little to lose from the smiles or the evil looks of

the occupant of the throne, and their judgment was not warped by

self-interest. Moreover, at Louvain, the people--always eager to resent

injustice and to champion the cause of the weak, were directly and

largely represented in the municipal senate, and a healthier, manlier,

more independent spirit pervaded the whole town. Nowhere in the duchy of

Brabant was John's unworthy conduct held in greater contempt, nowhere

were men more firmly determined to deliver him from the evil counsellors

who, for their own ends, had prompted it, and the burghers of Louvain,

to their honour, took the first step in this direction.

Shortly after Jacqueline's flight John, again short of cash, had

summoned the Estates of Brabant to meet at Brussels, and the aldermen of

Louvain, knowing very well that liberty could hardly be assured in the

Court city, utterly ignored John's invitation and invited the Estates on

the same day to assemble in their own town. It was a bold step, but the

issue proved the wisdom of it: when the appointed day arrived a few

stragglers from Antwerp and Bois-le-Duc betook themselves to Brussels,

and representatives of the first and second order from all parts of the

duchy flocked into the capital. They found it in a greater state of

commotion than any of them had anticipated, for news had just come to

hand of a fresh act of tyranny--the Duke had presumed to violate one of

the oldest and most cherished privileges of the time-honoured Church of

Saint Peter.

Thus: Sieger, chief of the house of Heetvelde, was one of the mightiest

nobles of Brabant in the far-off days of Duchess Jeanne, with whom he

claimed kinship, for he traced his descent to a natural son of the great

house of Gaesbeke, a legitimate though younger branch of the reigning

family. The Van Heetveldes, in the course of ages, had acquired estates

and manorial rights in all parts of the duchy; they were patricians,

too, of Louvain, for a Heetvelde of bygone days had married a daughter

of that city, and the status of patrician, unlike that of the feudal

lord, was transmissible in the female line. Invested with all the rights

and privileges of the various orders to which he belonged, at Brussels,

where he habitually resided, old Sieger was too mighty a man to be

loved; five _lignages_ banded together against him, and one morning he

was found in the Grand' Place with his throat cut. Who was the actual

murderer was never known, but Sieger's sons suspected a patrician called

Nicholas de Swaef, and publicly charged him with the crime, and hence

there arose a feud between the family of the murdered man and the family

of the man who, as he had sworn, had been falsely accused of the murder.

For years the streets of Brussels were the scene of their bloody

conflicts. In vain the burghers of Louvain joined their efforts to the

burghers of Brussels as mediators. At their instance Duchess Jeanne

ordained that the quarrel should be forgotten, menacing with death any

man who should venture to reopen it; but her threats were wholly

disregarded, and after twenty years the Heetveldes and the

Vanderstraetens[22] were still flying at one another's throats. At last,

about Easter 1417, the belligerents agreed to accept the arbitration of

Duke John IV., provided he gave his decision within a twelvemonth. For

some reason or other he neglected to do so, and it was not till the 20th

of June 1420 that he summoned the brothers Heetvelde to his presence and

informed them that he was about to pronounce judgment. To this they

demurred, on the ground that the stipulated time had long since gone by.

Whatever may have been the case three years before, the Vanderstraetens

were now John's friends and the Heetveldes among his bitterest

opponents, and naturally enough the latter feared he would not hold the

scales of justice evenly. Whereat John sentenced them, there and then,

to banishment as contumacious, and the Heetveldes, instead of

submitting, fled to Louvain. They were Petermen, they said, and as such

subject only to their own tribunal. What wonder, then, that the anger of

the burghers blazed more fiercely than ever, or that the Estates, to

which the Heetveldes had appealed, quashed the iniquitous sentence, and

forthwith informed the Duke that no fresh aid would be granted until

their grievances had been redressed. The miscreants who had deprived

Jacqueline of her heritage, driven her from Brabant, wasted the

resources of the realm, and who had not even feared to flout Saint

Peter, must first be dismissed from office. Nor did John dare to refuse,

but the men whom he named to take their places made his former

counsellers regretted: amongst them was Everard T'Serclaes, the _fons et

origo_ of all the mischief. Whereat the Estates, convinced that it was

hopeless to expect reform so long as John remained in power, did two

things--they sent letters to 'Madame the Duchess of Brabant and to

Madame the Widow, her mother,' proposing co-operation, and by 'the

vigour of the replies which they presently received were greatly

consoled and comforted'; and they despatched 'Friar Edmond' to Paris to

bring home the Count of Saint-Pol. And in this too they were successful,

for although the Duke, getting wind of it, had immediately written to

his brother urging him not to come, Friar Edmond proved himself the

better diplomatist, and on the 10th of September returned to Louvain,

bringing the young prince with him. Shortly afterwards came ambassadors

from the King of France and from the Duke of Burgundy with a mission

'to appease the strife which had arisen between Duke John of Brabant, on

the one part, and Madame the Duchess and Madame the Widow, and the

nobles and the good towns of Brabant, on the other'; and, better still,

a few days later came 'Madame Jaque herself and Madame her mother,' and

then, after much confabulation and much coming and going between

Brussels and Louvain, a conference was arranged at Vilvorde for Sunday

the 29th of September. Thither, on the appointed day, came the allies

from Louvain, with 'Madame Jaque and My Lord of Saint-Pol' at their

head. But Duke John did not come. Hardly safe at Brussels, where his

friends had still the upper hand, he was far too wise to attend a

meeting in a town where he knew his opponents were more numerous than

his partisans. Excusing himself on the ground of indisposition, he kept

close house, and at nightfall on the morrow stealthily crept out into

the darkness and slipped away. To cover his flight Everard T'Serclaes

gave out that the Duke was too ill to see anyone but a couple of trusty

serving-men, who were in the secret, and who carried his supper into his

bedchamber after his departure, as if he were still there, whereas in

reality he had fled with the Lord of Ashe and four others, who led him

by circuitous routes to Bois-le-Duc.

[22] These men seem to have been near kinsmen of Nicholas de Swaef.

As soon as it was publicly known that John had left the city, the

Assembly at Vilvorde, by the advice of the French ambassador, conferred

the government on Philip of Saint-Pol, who on the following day (October

2), along with Jacqueline, her mother and the Estates, triumphantly

entered Brussels.[23]

[23] _See_ De Dynter.

Five months before the Duchess of Brabant had left her home, accompanied

only by a humble serving-lad. As she wended her way through the muddy

streets to her mother's lodging in the _rue de la Montagne_ the few

stragglers who recognised her had stood silent as she passed, in

sympathy and respect at her humiliation; and now she returned in triumph

at the head of a brilliant cavalcade of churchmen, and knights and

burghers; and the people welcomed her with shouts of acclamation, and

with trumpets and clashing bells.

How different too was her position in the palace to what it had been in

former days. The fears of her poor little husband had compelled him to

leave it trembling, disguised, under cover of night, and by a back door,

in more pitiable condition almost than she had been when she had fled

from the Coudenberg. And the man without heart and without soul, who,

having robbed her of her husband's affection, thought it almost an

honourable thing to stoop to the pettiness of depriving her ladies of

their dinner, he, too, had gone the way of his master and his dupe, and

of the corrupt crew whose pride and debauchery had in days of yore

rendered her life intolerable, not one was left within the walls of the

Coudenberg.

She was now in the midst of friends and attended by her own people. Her

will was law. She was Sovereign, and, such was the chivalrous devotion

of the men who had rescued and restored her, that in the ardour of their

first enthusiasm they placed her interests before their own. At the

solemn assembly which took place next day in the Town Hall the Estates

unanimously decided to forthwith equip an expedition to wrest from John

the Pitiless 'the possessions of the Duchess which her husband had

abandoned to him without her consent.' Soon a great host was assembled

at Breda, hard by the cities it had been decided, in the first place, to

take. Knights from every lordship in Brabant were there, and armed

burghers from every town save Bois-le-Duc, and Jacqueline herself was in

the midst of them.

On the 16th of October she was at the gates of Heusden. The city

surrendered without a blow, and the next day she was solemnly enthroned

there as Duchess of Brabant. Four days later she sat down before

Gertruidenberg. On Saint Martin's Day the city went up in flames, and on

the 24th of November, flushed with victory, she returned at the head of

her troops to Brussels.

It was her last triumph. For a brief space her star had been in the

ascendant, and now it was already beginning to wane. Henceforth sorrow

was to dog her heel, and ill-fortune to confront her at every turn. The

Estates were again sitting, sometimes in the Coudenberg, sometimes in

the Town Hall, but the prelates and knights and burghers assembled had

other food for discussion than Jacqueline's Dutch affairs--the country

was threatened with invasion, perhaps with civil war: John at

Bois-le-Duc was hatching mischief. What particular form his mischief

would take no man could tell, not even the Duke himself, for he inclined

sometimes to one scheme, sometimes to another. All that was certainly

known was that he was endeavouring to recruit an army in the land

between the Meuse and the Rhine, that men of adventure were flocking to

his standard from the hope of obtaining loot, and that he had turned a

deaf ear to the deputation which the Regent had sent to Bois-le-Duc to

entreat him to desist from his evil designs. At Brussels amongst the

patricians he was known to have a considerable following, though many of

them dissembled their true sentiments. Several of the aldermen were

suspected of disaffection: at best they were but half-hearted patriots,

and Amman Cluting was known to be the Duke's man, and was divested of

his office in consequence.

Winter was coming on, and the city was filled with distress, for at any

moment the land might be plunged in the horrors of civil war, and

business was at a standstill. All that could be done had been done:

Philip had issued a proclamation in which he declared that at the

request of the Estates he had undertaken the government during the

absence of his brother, and the Estates, in their turn, had addressed a

letter to the nobles and the cities of Brabant informing them of the

motives which had inspired their action. There was nothing for it but to

await the issue of events. But inaction to one of Jacqueline's keen and

impetuous nature was altogether impossible, and shortly after the

failure of the Regent's negotiations with John, she set out with Madame

the Widow for Valenciennes. The men of Brabant were unable to help her;

she must seek assistance elsewhere. Philip of Burgundy was impossible:

he was playing his own game. The King of France was his puppet; there

was nothing to be done with him. Someone suggested England, and

presently, unknown to her mother, she flitted across the Channel,

determined to enlist the sympathy of her distant kinsman, King Henry V.

Better had she remained in Brabant: if only she could have possessed her

soul in patience she might have accomplished something.

Meanwhile at Brussels and throughout Brabant the air was thick with

rumours. What would the morrow bring forth? All trade was at a

standstill, it was the last month of the year and the empty stomachs of

men without work were already beginning to shrink from the grip of

winter. Every honest burgher as he turned into his bed at night was

firmly convinced that the tocsin would clang before dawn, and in the

morning he was no less sure that something untoward would happen before

sundown. For six weary weeks the good town of Brussels was on

tenterhooks, and then, on the 20th of January 1421, she was basely

betrayed into the hands of the enemy by her own magistrates.

It was common knowledge that some of the patricians were disaffected,

but no one imagined how far the evil had really spread until John

appeared before the Louvain gate with an army of Germans. Then the

renegades hoisted their true colours and then it was known for the first

time that no less than four of the patrician clans had cast in their lot

with his; and though the remaining three were composed for the most part

of good patriots, their representatives in the city council, flustered

and dismayed at the situation which had thus been suddenly sprung on

them, after some feeble show at resistance, yielded to their more

energetic colleagues.

These men had for weeks past been in correspondence with John, and had

arranged all the details of the plot at a secret meeting held in the

Vroente a few nights before, and when the Duke and his party arrived at

Tervueren early on the morning of the 21st of January, ex-Amman Cluting

and three of the confederate aldermen were there to receive him. When

John, as had been previously arranged, had re-invested Cluting with his

wand of office, the conspirators informed him that he would find no

difficulty in entering the city by the Porte de Louvain, for Alderman

Kegel was in command there and he would at once admit him; and having

delivered their message they returned to Brussels to make ready for his

reception. What, then, was the surprise of the ducal party when

presently they reached the appointed gate and found it shut! Some of the

more faint-hearted were for turning back, others for forcing an

entrance, but that was found to be impossible. Others again, not knowing

what to do, eased their minds by cursing the lying burghers who had

betrayed them. 'Gentle Knight,' crooned a hag, who had vainly asked for

alms of the Lord of Heinsberg, loudest in fierce declamation, 'gentle

Knight, do not worry yourself about entering the city, but when once you

are within consider well how best you may come out again.' He took

little heed at the time, says De Dynter, but later on he called to mind

what the old woman had said.

In reality Amman Cluting and his friends had not broken faith with John,

but when they reached Brussels they found that the news of his arrival

at Tervueren had preceded them and that the city was in a state of

uproar. Kegel had been removed from the Porte de Louvain, the Regent had

just ordered all the gates to be shut, and a meeting of the Grand

Council was actually taking place in the Town Hall. Thither, then, the

conspirators turned their horses' heads, and their arrival in the

Council Chamber was the signal for a stormy scene. At first the

magistrates of the Regent's faction hardened their hearts and stiffened

their backs--no power on earth should persuade them to consent to the

Duke's return, but their opponents were many and blustering, and they

were weak-kneed and few. Presently they began to hesitate, and at last,

when they accepted a compromise which was in reality a surrender, they

flattered themselves that their firmness had saved the situation.

The meeting had lasted the best part of the day, and darkness was

falling on the good town of Brussels when her aldermen, arrayed in robes

of state, solemnly went forth to the great act of betrayal.

[Illustration: THE TOWN HALL, BRUSSELS.]

Wending their way by the Rue de la Montagne, Saint Gudule's, and the

road which skirted the northern side of the park--then a great wood well

stocked with game and extending right up to the ramparts--they presently

reached the gate outside which John had been kicking his heels, as De

Dynter says, for more than two hours, and in due course made known to

him the result of their deliberations The Duke, they said, was free to

enter the city provided he would limit his escort to a hundred and

twenty men, amongst whom there must be no foreigner or no public enemy

of the State. John passed his word, the gates were thrown open, a

hundred and twenty knights rode in, and then the command rang out for

the rest to follow. Some of the bystanders were for resistance, but the

renegades succeeded in restraining them. Quick as thought the whole army

dashed up to the Coudenberg, and presently the Count of Saint-Pol rode

quietly off to Louvain.

[Illustration: OLD HOUSES NEAR SAINT GUDULE'S.]

Next morning the Duke went down to the Town Hall, where a great crowd of

aldermen, councillors, deans of trade companies and other civic

officials were expecting him. His policy, he told them, was one of

general appeasement, and he would fain have their co-operation; but

though no sign of dissent was made he was filled with misgiving. What if

his brother Philip should return with reinforcements? And presently he

summoned the aldermen to the palace and demanded of them the course

which in that event they would pursue. Their answer was a politic

one--if the Duke distrusted them they were quite ready to hand him the

keys of the city gates, but John would not hear of it. He was well

assured, he said, of their loyalty.

In reality the greatest source of danger was not from without but from

within--in the growing discontent of the people at the greed and

arrogance of 'these foreign _gens de guerre_,' who galloped through the

streets with their swords drawn as if Brussels were a conquered town,

and who openly bragged in hostel and tavern that they would not go back

to Germany till they were all rich men, aye, and that they meant to have

not only the goods, but the wives and the daughters of a host of wealthy

citizens whom it was the Duke's intention, so they averred, to presently

hang. What wonder then, when this state of things had been going on for

the best part of a week, that a serving-maid, who perceived a lighted

candle in the window of a certain foreign knight at an hour when all

honest men should be a-bed, clean lost her wits, and ran up screaming to

call her master; or that he, good man, when he had plucked up his

courage to peer in at the casement, and with his own eyes had seen the

knight arming, ran off at the top of his speed to tell the magistrates

that a plot was on foot to murder all the burghers; or that they, no

less scared than he, put a double guard at the city gates; or that a

great host of craftsmen soon appeared in the Grand' Place armed and

angry: and perhaps too they had reason. De Dynter is by no means sure

that the alleged plot was altogether imaginary. 'As to the aforesaid

conspiracy,' he says, 'it was found from information received, that the

Germans that night went to bed in their armour, and hence the

_Communaulté_ held that the fact was sufficiently proven; but they, the

Germans, on the other hand, denied all knowledge of it, alleging that

they had only armed, when they heard the roar of the mob, not knowing

what might be going to happen; and I, for my part, have not been able to

discover the truth of the matter, and hence I can only note down what

each party said.' Several of John's partisans, who afterwards fell into

the hands of the Regent, not only acknowledged, albeit under torture,

that a massacre had been in contemplation, but divulged its object,

adding names and details: some fifteen hundred German knights, with

Heinsberg and Amman Cluting at their head, were to rise at a given

signal--the sounding of the bell of _Saint Jacques sur Coudenberg_,

seize the Town Hall, and, having thus made themselves masters of the

city, arrest all the popular leaders and put them to death. The object

being to break up Philip's party at Brussels before he had time to

return with the reinforcements which he had gone to seek at Louvain.

Be this as it may, so firmly convinced were the craftsmen that some

great catastrophe was impending that they all turned out in the middle

of Monday night, as we have seen, determined, if need be, to sell their

lives dearly. So fierce and so threatening was their attitude, and so

alarming were the rumours which presently reached the palace, that about

eleven o'clock Duke John, who was not without courage in moments of

emergency, determined to go forth himself and do what he could to calm

the storm, but his efforts were met with shouts of derision; as he rode

round the market from guild to guild, begging the rioters to go home to

bed, and assuring them they had no cause for fear, 'Go home to bed

yourself,' they cried, 'and sleep well; your own fears are groundless,

not one of us would harm a hair of your head,' and they probably spoke

the truth, for though his subjects despised him and detested his methods

of government, John himself was not personally unpopular. Indeed, the

people regarded him rather with pity than hatred, for, after all, he was

but a poor little puppet, the men who pulled the strings were alone to

blame. They were soon to have their reward, but not to-night: it was not

until Wednesday morning that a great mob of armed craftsmen came surging

up to the palace. John faced them. 'Why this tumult? What did it mean?'

'Heinsberg, and they meant to have him.' And soon Heinsberg was led

forth, for there was no denying them, and, oh! the irony of it, by his

fellow-conspirator, Cluting. It was the amman's last official act: two

days later he was himself arrested, and afterwards endured, as we shall

see, a worse fate than the man whom he now handed over to the aldermen,

who, like their chief, had changed sides, to be dragged in chains to

prison. Before noon every German in Brussels was taken: the knights

fettered and cast into gaol, their followers stripped and with only a

few rags to cover them turned loose into the winter fields, and towards

dusk the cheering of the mob and the bells from a hundred steeples

announced Philip's arrival with a great army of nobles from the

countryside, and of burghers from Louvain and Antwerp.

That night the craftsmen of Brussels were in a wild frenzy of

gladness--not only on account of their triumph, but because they knew

that the wine for which they had so long thirsted, the glorious wine of

liberty, would soon be gurgling down their throats; the fragrance of its

bouquet already filled their nostrils and they were drunk in

anticipation. Philip had hailed them as the saviours of Brabant, and he

would never refuse to strong men flushed with victory the wages they had

justly earned. Let patricians do what they would, self-government was

now assured to them.

As a matter of fact, it was not in the power of the patricians, split

up as they were into hostile factions, to offer opposition to anyone.

The clans which had triumphed and which, had they been left to their own

resources, would have been utterly wiped out, were bound hand and foot

to the plebeian allies who had rescued them and given them the victory.

Their vanquished opponents, utterly cowed, were considering only how

best they might escape the consequences of their indiscretion. From

these men, then, there was nothing to fear.

On the night of Philip's coming some of the most deeply implicated,

amongst them Alderman Kegel and old William of Assche, desperate in the

belief that if they remained in Brussels their doom was fixed, taking

their lives in their hands sallied forth boldly into the streets, and

passing through the crowd, unnoticed in the darkness and confusion,

succeeded in gaining the open country and a place of refuge till the

storm had passed. The rest, trembling behind barred doors and windows,

expected each moment to be dragged forth and torn in pieces by an

infuriated mob--phantom peril, offspring of their conscious guilt. The

city, given over to rejoicing, was content to leave vengeance in

Philip's hands, and Philip, good man, wearied out with the day's

travail, had retired to bed. It was not until the morrow, after dinner,

that he proceeded with a small escort to the Coudenberg and put all, or

nearly all, of the members of the ducal household under arrest. The

greater number, however, were set at liberty the same day, though none

of them were reinstated in office. Indeed, in dealing not only with

these men, but with the burghers who had opposed him, Philip certainly

acted with singular moderation. His policy seems to have been to strike

at the leaders only, and that, with no undue harshness, and to suffer

the small fry to go scot-free.

Though the number of persons concerned in one or other of the recent

conspiracies must have been considerable, probably not less than a

thousand, some twenty only were deemed worthy of punishment, notable

burghers all of them or nobles from the countryside. Fourteen who had

been duly tried, and under torture had acknowledged their guilt, were

sentenced to imprisonment for life in fortresses outside the city. A

direct violation this of one of the most cherished privileges of

citizenship, but doubtless inspired out of consideration for the

personal safety of the prisoners, who would have run no small risk of

being lynched if they had been detained in Brussels. Some three or four

who had fled from justice were condemned in default to lifelong exile

and to the forfeiture of their estates. Only two were brought to the

block, ex-Amman Cluting and one of his sergeants. They were taken on the

Thursday night, and their end came with tragic speed. 'On Saturday

morning,' says De Dynter, who was perhaps an eye-witness of the scene he

describes, 'the whole community being assembled in the market-place

under arms, Jan Cluetinck and Arnulph Vander Hove were led bound into

the midst, and when Gerard Vander Zype, who ruled the Regent, coming

forth from the Town Hall, with a loud voice had cried out, "Now we are

going to begin," Amman Diedeghem gave the signal, and straightway and

without any interval their heads were struck off.'

Cluting had not only taken an active part in the betrayal of the city on

the 21st of January, but he was said to have been a prime mover in the

alleged German conspiracy to murder the leaders of the popular party;

and seeing that Philip and his barons were firmly convinced of the

reality of the plot and that his guilt was proven, they could hardly

have done otherwise than condemn him to death. In all probability

Vander Hove died for aiding and abetting his chief. De Dynter, however,

does not tell us for what crime he suffered: he contents himself with

simply recording the fact of his execution.

One cannot help being astonished at the moderation which the working

population of Brussels at this time showed. The craftsmen were now

masters of the city, they were seconded by a large number of the

patricians themselves, and in all probability no demand which they had

chosen to make would have been refused them. Yet, unlike their fellows

of Bruges and Ghent, who had long since excluded their patricians as

such from all share in municipal government, so that they could only

take part in civic affairs by enrolling themselves in one or other of

the trade companies, the craftsmen of Brussels were content with a half

share in the government of the city. All the old institutions were

preserved, but they were enlarged so as to admit the plebeian element,

or new institutions were created alongside of them.

So complicated did the municipal machinery now become, that any detailed

account of it is impossible within the limits of this volume; suffice it

to say, that at the head of the administration were two burgomasters,

the first a patrician and the second a plebeian, the patrician

burgomaster being chosen by the craftsmen from a list of three names

presented to them annually by the incoming aldermen, who as heretofore

were all patricians, and the plebeian burgomaster being chosen by the

aldermen from a list of three names presented to them by the trade

companies. These officers were held to be the representatives _par

excellence_ of the city, its guardians and supreme chiefs, and they were

invested with judicial powers to settle all trade disputes, in which the

matter at issue did not exceed a _demi livre vieux gros._

The magistracy proper, as of yore, consisted of a College of Aldermen of

seven members and two patrician treasurers. No change was made in the

manner of their appointment, but it was ordained that henceforth these

offices should only be conferred on patricians resident in Brussels, and

such as were not in the employ of the Duke or of any great noble,

because, as the charter quaintly explains, such have been found by

experience to be _peu profitables._ Added to the magistracy were eight

plebeian members, viz., six councillors and two treasurers. These were

selected by the aldermen from a triple list presented to them by the

trade companies. Thus the magistracy consisted of seventeen members, of

whom nine were patricians and eight plebeians. Also provision was made

for a referendum to the people. When in the opinion of the burgomasters

and the plebeian councillors such a course was desirable, they were

competent to convoke the juries of the trade companies, but before doing

so they were bound to advise the aldermen. Then when they had

communicated to the craftsmen the opinion of the magistracy on the

matter in hand they demanded their decision, and that decision seems to

have been final. Thus, though the patricians had a majority of one in

the town council, the last word practically lay with the people in all

grave matters.

The articles of the new charter were agreed upon in a great assembly of

barons and of deputies of the towns of Brussels, Antwerp and Louvain, on

Thursday the 6th of February 1421. The charter itself was signed and

sealed by the Regent on the following Tuesday (February 11), and its

provisions were immediately put into execution.

Until now the proletariat of Brussels had willingly acquiesced in the

wise and moderate policy of the Regent and his advisers. No constraint

had been placed on the personal liberty of Duke John; the three

aldermen of the popular party, in spite of their lamentable weakness in

the matter of the great betrayal, had not been deprived of office. Of

the many who were undoubtedly guilty, only a comparatively small number

had been put on trial, and the light punishments meted out to them might

well have called forth the resentment of those who had suffered from

their crimes; and yet the working population had acquiesced in all these

things, and when they had at length received their charter of

enfranchisement the craftsmen were content to lay down their arms; but

the mildness and confidence of these men was soon to give place to cruel

suspicion and an insatiable hunger for vengeance.

Shortly after Jacqueline's flight in the summer of 1420 some of Duke

John's most intimate friends had banded together in a secret and

lifelong league to support the throne, and generally to defend the Duke

against the machinations of his enemies. This at least was the

ostensible object of the league, but there is little doubt that the

action of its members, all of whom were partisans of the Straetens, was

inspired less by love of John than by hatred of the brothers Heetvelde.

The matter was kept so quiet that none of the Duke's opponents had any

inkling of it until the close of March 1421, when Gerard Vander

Straeten, Provost of Saint Jacques sur Coudenberg, and one of the

greatest churchmen in Brabant, was arrested, on suspicion seemingly, of

being concerned in the German plot, of which Hendric Van Heetvelde,

rumour had it, was to have been the first victim.

Whatever the cause of his arrest may have been, the consequences of it

were tremendous. His house was searched, and there in his chamber were

found mysterious papers relating to the secret league, with the names of

the members in their own handwriting, and with their signets affixed,

and also a letter of approval signed and sealed by Duke John himself.

The men of Brussels were bewildered and dismayed. What did it all mean?

But when the _i_'s were dotted and the _t_'s were crossed by the

burghers imprisoned without the walls, constrained thereto by

torture--for these miscreants were all implicated--dismay became frenzy,

and bewilderment a mighty voice compelling retribution. Again the

craftsmen flew to arms, again they surged into the market-place, and

again, but not until three days had passed, Myn Here Vander Zype

appeared in the tribune of proclamation. 'Children,' he cried, 'be of

good heart, your prayer is granted,' and presently the sergeants led in

'Gedolphus of Coudenberg, Willem Pipenpoy and Lord Everard T'Serclaes,

Knight,'--conspirators, all of them, on their own showing; for had they

not set their hands and seals to the fatal roll in Vander Straeten's

chamber? The name of T'Serclaes was second on the list, and he was

probably the originator of the movement--evilest of John's evil

counsellors, unworthy offspring of a noble stock, and yet, for his

father's sake, they might have spared him; but no voice was raised on

his behalf, and his head was struck off with the rest. Of Vander

Straeten's ultimate fate, De Dynter, who tells the story, says nothing,

but his name in itself was enough to damn him.

If Philip and his council had been left to their own devices, these

men's lives would doubtless have been spared. It was only under

compulsion that they at last yielded to the clamour of the mob, and if

they had held out longer, not even the influence of Vander Zype, who, as

De Dynter reiterates again and again, 'ruled the Regent and swayed the

people,' would have availed to save the rest of the leaguers. As it was,

he was able to induce the craftsmen to lay down their arms and to

acquiesce, for the moment, in no further proceedings being taken against

them. Shortly afterwards Duke John formally approved of all that the

Estates and the Regent had done, confirmed the new charter, and solemnly

promised that no man should ever be molested for anything that had taken

place in the course of the revolution. 'Whereat,' says De Dynter, 'the

common folk were so well pleased that those in authority, having pity on

the burghers imprisoned without the walls, were emboldened to mitigate

the rigour of their confinement.'

At Louvain they were even permitted to receive their friends and to eat

and drink with them. Naturally they took heart. Some of them began to

dream of pardon, and even, over their wine-cups, to utter threats of

vengeance, which of course reached the ears of the craftsmen of

Brussels, and of course bred uproar. 'These blusterers must be led to

the block; that was the only way to deal with them. Public safety

demanded it.' In vain Vander Zype urged that it were the grossest

injustice to increase the punishment of men who had been already tried

and sentenced; the insurgents answered that the sum of their infamy was

not then known, and that, if this boon were not granted, they would have

out the Germans and cut their throats.

That was enough. Sigismund was already pressing for his subjects'

release, and the Regent knew that if any evil should befall them he

would have to make ready for battle. On Saturday, then, the 7th of June

1421, the prisoners were led in chains to Brussels, and before sundown

they were dead men. On the morrow, when Gerard Vander Zype rode through

the Grand' Place along with the bride to whom he had just plighted his

troth in the old Church of Saint Nicholas, the pavement was still red

with their blood, and they were all of them his own kinsmen--gruesome

prelude this to the banquet of which the newly married couple were

about to partake in the ducal palace.

Had Jeanne Vander Zype no foreboding of the horrible doom in store for

her husband? And if so, did her heaving bosom gleam with those priceless

jewels, the wedding gift with which Heinsberg hoped, not vainly, to

purchase his redemption?

Of these things De Dynter says nothing, but we know that, thanks to

Gerard's good offices, the German knights were released shortly after

his marriage, and that the craftsmen, mollified by the blood which he

had shed, offered no resistance; and we know, too, that the man who had

sacrificed his kinsfolk to avert war was made to suffer for it in his

own person, but not yet.

One chronicler asserts that Duke John himself was present at the

executions of the 7th of June; but if this had been the case, De Dynter

would have almost certainly mentioned it; and, moreover, as Wauters

justly observes, the story is a most improbable one: John was so grieved

at the death of his friends that he left Brussels immediately after the

executions, perhaps even before they had taken place, and refused to

return to the Coudenberg for two years.

Things being now set in order, the councillors who had led John astray

being all in exile or dead, and John himself having solemnly engaged to

rule henceforth according to law, the Estates were for recalling him and

reinvesting him with the government of his domains; but Philip,

supported by the men of Brussels, was loth to lay down authority, and

for a time it seemed as if there would be trouble. At last, however,

when all the confiscated estates of John's favourites had been conferred

on him by way of _solatium,_ and a large cash payment to cover expenses

out of pocket, he yielded, and on November 25, 1423, Duke John came back

to Brussels.

Some turbulent spirits there were who, angered at the Duke's refusal to

retain the services of the Lord of Bigard, whom the magistrates had

appointed captain of the city, on the ground that as he, John, had now

returned he would be able in future to perform the duties incumbent on

that office himself, broke out into riot, but the vast majority of the

craftsmen were little inclined to risk their new-born liberty in the

fortunes of a fresh revolution. Philip's influence was now on the side

of the authorities, the disturbance was soon quelled, and the Lord of

Bigard having submitted to the Duke, by order of the city magistrates

was relieved of his office.

When Philip of Saint-Pol resigned the regency, Duke John, compelled

thereto, no doubt, by his brother, had named Gerard Vander Zype

Controller-General of Finance and Chief Steward of his household--the

most honourable and lucrative appointment in his gift. At first the Duke

professed himself well pleased with Vander Zype's management, but

presently he began to complain of his unconscionable parsimony: even his

own board, he alleged, was insufficiently furnished, and he knew there

was no lack of funds. Perhaps there was another cause for John's

rancour, perhaps in his heart he resented the violence which his steward

had done to so many of his friends. Still there was no open rupture, but

the Duke's sentiments were well known, it was whispered abroad that

Vander Zype's removal, by whatever means, would be welcome to him, and

this is what happened.

On the morning of the 23rd of April 1424 Gerard Vander Zype rode out to

Tervueren, where the Duke was at this time sojourning. Having transacted

the business which called him there--what it was De Dynter does not

say--he set out on the homeward journey early in the afternoon. The road

from Tervueren to Brussels led, as it still does, through the forest of

Soignes, in those days a much more wild and desolate tract of country

than it is now. When he had accomplished half of his journey and was

nearing Stockel, on the outskirts of the wood, he descried in the

distance a horse-man riding furiously towards him. It was 'Messire Jehan

Blondeel, who hated him with a perfect hatred.' 'Death, death!' cried

the knight as he hurled himself against his foe, and, dragging him from

his saddle, plunged his sword into his heart.

Vander Zype was not unattended, but his servants, probably in Blondeel's

pay, took to their heels at the first sign of danger, and the body of

the great patriot was left alone by the wayside all night.

In the morning it was found by some country folk and carried to

Brussels, and presently, by order of Philip, cut to the quick at the

death of his friend, laid to rest in the Church of Saint Jacques sur

Coudenberg with solemn dirge and requiem.

[Illustration]

The Story of Brussels · 第 13 / 19 章