IF THE SOUL IS AN ENTELECHY, SHE IS A DIFFERENT ONE THAN ARISTOTLE'S.

If the soul's relation to the body is the same as that of the statue

to the metal, the soul will be divided with the body, and on cutting

a member a portion of the soul would be cut along with it. According

to this teaching, the soul separates from the body only during sleep,

since she must inhere in the body of which she is the entelechy, in

which case sleep would become entirely inexplicable. If the soul be an

entelechy, the struggle of reason against the passions would become

entirely impossible. The entire human being will experience but one

single sentiment, and never be in disagreement with itself. If the

soul be an entelechy, there will perhaps still be sensations, but mere

sensations; pure thoughts will have become impossible. Consequently

the Peripateticians themselves are obliged to introduce (into human

nature) another soul, namely, the pure intelligence, which they

consider immortal.[77] The rational soul, therefore, would have to be

an entelechy in a manner different from their definition thereof, if

indeed this name is at all to be used.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 1 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 171 / 467 题