M. Sonnino suggested that volunteers might be called for.

Mr. Lloyd George, continuing, said that it would be

impossible to raise 150,000 men in that way. He asked,

however, what contributions America, Italy and France would

make towards the raising of this Army.

President Wilson and M. Clemenceau each said none.

M. Orlando agreed that Italy could make no further

contributions.

Mr. Lloyd George said that the Bolshevists had an army of

300,000 men who would, before long, be good soldiers, and to

fight them at least 400,000 Russian soldiers would be

required. Who would feed, equip and pay them? Would Italy,

or America, or France, do so? If they were unable to do

that, what would be the good of fighting Bolshevism? It

could not be crushed by speeches. He sincerely trusted that

they would accept President Wilson's proposal as it now

stood.

M. Orlando agreed that the question was a very difficult one

for the reasons that had been fully given. He agreed that

Bolshevism constituted a grave danger to all Europe. To

prevent a contagious epidemic from spreading, the

sanitarians set up a _cordon Sanitaire_. If similar measures

could be taken against Bolshevism, in order to prevent its

spreading, it might be overcome, since to isolate it meant

vanquishing it. Italy was now passing through a period of

depression, due to war weariness. But Bolshevists could

never triumph there, unless they found a favourable medium,

such as might be produced either by a profound patriotic

disappointment in their expectations as to the rewards of

the war, or by an economic crisis. Either might lead to

revolution, which was equivalent to Bolshevism. Therefore,

he would insist that all possible measures should be taken

to set up this cordon. Next, he suggested the consideration

of repressive measures. He thought two methods were

possible; either the use of physical force or the use of

moral force. He thought Mr. Lloyd George's objection to the

use of physical force unanswerable. The occupation of Russia

meant the employment of large numbers of troops for an

indefinite period of time. This meant an apparent

prolongation of the war. There remained the use of moral

force. He agreed with M. Clemenceau that no country could

continue in anarchy and that an end must eventually come;

but they could not wait; they could not proceed to make

peace and ignore Russia. Therefore, Mr. Lloyd George's

proposal, with the modifications introduced after careful

consideration by President Wilson and M. Clemenceau, gave a

possible solution. It did not involve entering into

negotiations with the Bolsheviks; the proposal was merely an

attempt to bring together all the parties in Russia with a

view to finding a way out of the present difficulty. He was

prepared, therefore, to support it.

President Wilson asked for the views of his Japanese

colleagues.

Baron Makino said that after carefully considering the

various points of view put forward, he had no objections to

make regarding the conclusions reached. He thought that was

the best solution under the circumstances. He wished,

however, to enquire what attitude would be taken by the

Representatives of the Allied powers if the Bolshevists

accepted the invitation to the meeting and there insisted

upon their principles. He thought they should under no

circumstances countenance Bolshevist ideas. The conditions

in Siberia East of the Baikal had greatly improved. The

objects which had necessitated the despatch of troops to

that region had been attained. Bolshevism was no longer

aggressive, though it might still persist in a latent form.

In conclusion, he wished to support the proposal before the

meeting.

President Wilson expressed the view that the emissaries of

the Allied Powers should not be authorised to adopt any

definite attitude towards Bolshevism. They should merely

report back to their Governments the conditions found.

Mr. Lloyd George asked that that question be further

considered. He thought the emissaries of the Allied Powers

should be able to establish an agreement if they were able

to find a solution. For instance, if they succeeded in

reaching an agreement on the subject of the organization of

a Constituent Assembly, they should be authorised to accept

such a compromise without the delay of a reference to the

Governments.

President Wilson suggested that the emissaries might be

furnished with a body of instructions.

Mr. Balfour expressed the view that abstention from hostile

action against their neighbours should be made a condition

of their sending representatives to this meeting.

President Wilson agreed.

M. Clemenceau suggested that the manifesto to the Russian

parties should be based solely on humanitarian grounds. They

should say to the Russians: "You are threatened by famine.

We are prompted by humanitarian feelings; we are making

peace; we do not want people to die. We are prepared to see

what can be done to remove the menace of starvation." He

thought the Russians would at once prick up their ears, and

be prepared to hear what the Allies had to say. They would

add that food cannot be sent unless peace and order were

re-established. It should, in fact, be made quite clear that

the representatives of all parties would merely be brought

together for purely humane reasons.

Mr. Lloyd George said that in this connection he wished to

invite attention to a doubt expressed by certain of the

delegates of the British Dominions, namely, whether there

would be enough food and credit to go round should an

attempt be made to feed all Allied countries, and enemy

countries, and Russia also. The export of so much food would

inevitably have the effect of raising food prices in Allied

countries and so create discontent and Bolshevism. As

regards grain, Russia had always been an exporting country,

and there was evidence to show that plenty of food at

present existed in the Ukraine.

President Wilson said that his information was that enough

food existed in Russia, but, either on account of its being

hoarded or on account of difficulties of transportation, it

could not be made available.

(It was agreed that President Wilson should draft a

proclamation, for consideration at the next meeting,

inviting all organized parties in Russia to attend a Meeting

to be held at some selected place such as Salonika or

Lemnos, in order to discuss with the representatives of the

Allied and Associated Great Powers the means of restoring

order and peace in Russia. Participation in the Meeting

should be conditional on a cessation of hostilities.)

2. _Peace Conference_.--M. Clemenceau considered it to be

most urgent that the delegates should be set to work. He

understood that President Wilson would be ready to put on

the table at the next full Conference, proposals relating to

the creation of a League of Nations. He was anxious to add a

second question, which could be studied immediately, namely,

reparation for damages. He thought the meeting should

consider how the work should be organized in order to give

effect to this suggestion.

Mr. Lloyd George said that he agreed that these questions

should be studied forthwith. He would suggest that, in the

first place, the League of Nations should be considered,

and, that after the framing of the principles, an

International Committee of Experts be set to work out its

constitution in detail. The same remark applied also to the

question of indemnities and reparation. He thought that a

Committee should also be appointed as soon as possible to

consider International Labour Legislation.

President Wilson observed that he had himself drawn up a

constitution of a League of Nations. He could not claim that

it was wholly his own creation. Its generation was as

follows:--He had received the Phillimore Report, which had

been amended by Colonel House and re-written by himself. He

had again revised it after having received General Smuts'

and Lord Robert Cecil's reports. It was therefore a compound

of these various suggestions. During the week he had seen M.

Bourgeois, with whom he found himself to be in substantial

accord on principles. A few days ago he had discussed his

draft with Lord Robert Cecil and General Smuts, and they

found themselves very near together.

Mr. Balfour suggested that President Wilson's draft should

be submitted to the Committee as a basis for discussion.

President Wilson further suggested that the question should

be referred as far as possible to the men who had been

studying it.

Mr. Lloyd George expressed his complete agreement. He

thought they themselves should, in the first place, agree on

the fundamental principles and then refer the matter to the

Committee. When that Committee met they could take President

Wilson's proposals as the basis of discussion.

(It was agreed that the question of appointing an

International Committee, consisting of two members from each

of the five Great Powers, to whom would be referred

President Wilson's draft, with certain basic principles to

guide them, should be considered at the next meeting.)

3. _Poland_.--M. Pichon called attention to the necessity

for replying to the demand addressed by M. Paderewski to

Colonel House, which had been read by President Wilson that

morning, and asked that Marshal Foch should be present.

(It was agreed that this question should be discussed at the

next Meeting.)

4. _Disarmament_.--Mr. Balfour called attention to the

urgency of the question of disarmament, and said that he

would shortly propose that a Committee should be appointed

to consider this question.

VILLA MAJESTIC, Paris January 21st, 1919.

This is the minute of January 21, and the Prinkipos memorandum was

written on January 22.

The instructions to the President were as follows:

It was agreed that President Wilson should draft a

proclamation for consideration at the next meeting, inviting

all organized parties in Russia to attend a meeting to be

held at some selected place such as Salonika or Lemnos, in

order to discuss with the representatives of the allied and

associated great powers the means of restoring order and

peace in Russia. Participation in the meeting should be

conditional on a cessation of hostilities.

The President then wrote the Prinkipos proposition.

Senator KNOX. Did you make a written report of your mission?

Mr. BULLITT. I did, sir.

Senator KNOX. Have you it here?

Mr. BULLITT. Yes, sir. I might read the report without the appendices.

Senator KNOX. The chairman wants you to read it.

The CHAIRMAN. I do not know whether it is very long. The report he

made would be of some interest. You were the only official

representative sent?

Mr. BULLITT. Yes, sir; except Capt. Pettit, my assistant. The

circumstances of my sending will perhaps require further elucidation.

I not only was acquainted with the minutes of the discussions of the

council of ten, but in addition I had discussed the subject with each

of the commissioners each morning and I had talked with many British

representatives. After the Prinkipos proposal was made, the replies

began to come in from various factions, that they would refuse to

accept it for various reasons. The Soviet Government replied in a

slightly evasive form. They said, "We are ready to accept the terms of

the proposals, and we are ready to talk about stopping fighting." They

did not say, "We are ready to stop fighting on such and such a date."

It was not made specific.

Senator KNOX. That was one of the conditions of the proposal?

The Bullitt Mission to Russia Testimony before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, of William C. Bullitt · 第 39 / 89 题