How much these views may have weighed with the Doctor it would be

impossible to say. If they did not influence directly, they were

certainly suggestive of considerations which did have their weight. The

result was, that permission was given for the stay of Reuben, on

condition that Mr. Brindlock could give him constant occupation, and

that he should be regular in his attendance on the Sabbath at the

Fulton-Street Church. Shortly after, the Doctor goes to the city,

provided, by the watchful care of Miss Eliza, with a complete wardrobe

for the truant boy, and bearing kind messages from the household. But

chiefly it is the Doctor's object to give his poor boy due admonition

for his great breach of duty, and to insist upon his writing to the

worthy Mr. Brummem a full apology for his conduct. He also engages his

friend of the Fulton-Street parish to have an eye upon his son, and to

report to him at once any wide departure from the good conduct he

promises.

Reuben writes the apology insisted upon to Mr. Brummem in this style:--

"MY DEAR SIR,--I am sorry that I threw 'Daboll' in your face

as I did, and hope you will forgive the same.

"Yours respectfully."

But after the Doctor's approval of this, the lad cannot help adding a

postscript of his own to this effect:--

"P.S. I hope old Whiteface didn't lose a shoe when you drove

out on the river road? I saw you; for I was sitting in the

edge of the woods, eating Keziah's gingerbread. Please thank

her, and give my respects to all the fellows."

Miss Johns considers it her duty to write a line of expostulation to her

nephew, which she does, with faultless penmanship, in this strain:--

"We were shocked to hear of your misconduct toward the

worthy Mr. Brummem. I could hardly believe it possible that

Master Reuben Johns had been guilty of such an indiscretion.

Your running away was, I think, uncalled for, and the

embarkment upon the sloop, under the circumstances, was

certainly very reprehensible. I trust that we shall hear

only good accounts of you from this period forth, and that

you will be duly grateful for your father's distinguished

kindness in allowing you to stay in New York. I shall be

happy to have you write to me an occasional epistle, and

hope to see manifest a considerable improvement in your

handwriting. Does Sister Mabel wear her ermine cape this

winter? I trust we shall hear of your constant attendance at

the Fulton-Street Church, and hear only commendation of you

in whatever, duties you may be called to engage. Adele

speaks of you often, and I think misses you very much

indeed."

Yet the spinster aunt was not used to flatter Reuben with any such

mention as this. "What can she mean," said he, musingly, "by talking

such stuff to me?"

Phil Elderkin, too, after a little, writes long letters that are full of

the daily boy-life at Ashfield:--how "the chestnutting has been

first-rate this year," and he has a bushel of prime ones seasoning in

the garret;--how Sam Throop, the stout son of the old postmaster, has

had a regular tussle with the master in school, "hot and heavy, over the

benches, and all about, and Sam was expelled, and old Crocker got a

black eye, and, darn him, he's got it yet";--and how "_somebody_ (name

unknown) tied a smallish tin kettle to old Hobson's sorrel mare's tail

last Saturday night, and the way she went down the street was a

caution!"--and how Nat Boody has got a new fighting-dog, and _such_ a

ratter!--and how Suke, "the divine Suke, is, they say, going to marry

the stage-driver. _Sic transit gloria mulie_--something,--for I'll be

hanged, if I know the proper case."

And there are some things this boisterous Phil writes in tenderer

mood:--how "Rose and Adele are as thick as ever, and Adele comes up

pretty often to pass an evening,--glad enough, I guess, to get away from

Aunt Eliza,--and I see her home, of course. She plays a stiff game of

backgammon; she never throws but she makes a point; she beats me."

And from such letters the joyous shouts and merry halloos of the

Ashfield boys come back to him again; he hears the rustling of the

brook, the rumbling of the mill; he sees the wood standing on the hills,

and the girls at the door-yard gates; the hum of voices in the old

academy catches his ear, and the drowsy song of the locusts coming in at

the open windows all the long afternoons of August; and he watches again

the glancing feet of Rose--who was once Amanda--tripping away under the

sycamores; and the city Mortimer bethinks him of another Amanda, of

browner hue and in coquettish straw, idling along the same street, with

reticule lightly swung upon her finger; and the boy bethinks him of

tender things he might have said in the character of Mortimer, but never

did say, and of kisses he might have stolen, (in the character of

Mortimer,) but never did steal.

And now these sights, voices, vagaries, as month after month passes in

his new home, fade,--fade, yet somehow abide. The patter of a thousand

feet are on the pavement around him. What wonder, if, in the surrounding

din, the tranquillity of Ashfield, its scenes, its sounds, should seem a

mere dream of the past? What wonder, if the solemn utterances from the

old pulpit should be lost in the roar of the new voices? The few months

he was to spend in their hearing run into a score, and again into

another score. Two or three years hence we shall meet him

again,--changed, certainly; but whether for better or for worse the

sequel will show.

And Rose?--and Adele?

Well, well, we must not overleap the quiet current of our story. While

the May violets are in bloom, let us enjoy them and be thankful; and

when the autumn flowers are come to take their places, let us enjoy

those, too, and thank God.

DEEP-SEA DAMSELS.

"Once I sat upon a promontory,

And heard a mermaid, on a dolphin's back,

Uttering such dulcet and harmonious breath,

That the rude sea grew civil at her song;

And certain stars shot madly from their spheres

To hear the sea-maid's music."

_A Midsummer Night's Dream._

Men have a commodious faith generally, and in the things of land and

water; but they do not believe in the mermaid.

Once, a thousand years ago, a certain Arabian traveller described an

Oriental fish that came up out of the sea to catch flies or to get a

drink. It was no crabbed crustacean, no compromise of claws; but a fish

with fins,--a perch: and, being a perch, it not only came up on dry

land, but did, the traveller said, climb trees. There was a climax! No

one characterized this story fitly, for all perceived that the Arabian

must know its nature very well. And so the Arabian traveller died in

good time, and the thousand years went on about their business, and in

our days the fish story has been verified. Now it rests, partly, on the

authority of "two Dutch naturalists residing at Tranquebar." Two Dutch

naturalists are a good foundation for anything less than a pyramid. In

this matter they are not alone, however; for the naturalist Daldorf,

also, who was a lieutenant in the Danish East-India Company's service,

communicated to Joseph Banks, who "did not believe in the mermaid," that

"in the year 1791 he had taken this fish from a moist cavity in the stem

of a Palmyra palm which grew near a lake." More than this, "he saw it

when already five feet above the ground struggling to ascend still

higher." And this was its process: "suspending itself by its

gill-covers, and bending its tail to the left, it fixed its anal fin in

the cavity of the bark, and sought by expanding its body to urge its way

upward"; and its progress was arrested only by the hand with which the

valiant Daldorf seized it. More in reference to the same fish may be

found in Tennent's great book on Ceylon, in Hartwig, and later

naturalists generally.

Men would naturally doubt of fish in trees. Even the Chinese would. "To

climb a tree in pursuit of fish," is a phrase actually used as an

hyperbole of nonsense by many Tsze, in the book called "Shang Mung." And

the above is therefore a fair instance of the progress of human

intelligence,--of a thousand years of incredulity, and final scientific

admission. Let it be taken here as absinthe, appetizingly.

The ancients believed, among other things, that man had, to say the

least, relations in the various departments of Nature and in the various

divisions of animal life; that there were wild men who lived in the

forests, and differed from man proper principally in other than

physical respects; and that there were wild men who lived in the sea:

also that there were beings half-man and half-horse; others half-man and

half-bird; and others, again, half-man and half-fish. In respect to the

wild man of the woods, it may be said that those words are the literal

signification of the Malayan words _orang outang_; and that animal's

appearance seems to determine that the Satyr and kindred creatures were

not entirely imaginations. For the half-man and half-horse we have

abundant explanation in the various wild riding tribes of men,

especially the Tartars. The half-bird appears to have been distinguished

for only a singing reason, and is therefore, as it were, a piece of

heraldry. For the wild man of the sea, and the half-man and half-fish,

what have we?

Let us see.

Apparently the earliest presentation to men's eyes of that form under

which the mermaid is still figured was the image, in very ancient days,

of Derceto, goddess of the Philistines of Ascalon, in a temple of that

city. She was woman above and fish below. She had been a beautiful

virgin, but had excited that all-prevalent passion since irregulated by

Aphrodite. It proved her ruin, she cast herself into the sea, and

suffered the partial metamorphosis. So was it fabled in that land: but

it is much more plausibly thought that the combination of woman and fish

declared, hieroglyphically, some dim knowledge that those ancients had

of certain relations between the moon and the sea, of which things the

respective parts were typical.

Half-fishy also was the form of that Dagon which in Ashdod, or Azotus,

another city of the Philistines, fell down upon his face before the ark

of the Lord. This Dagon was the god, apparently, in whose honor the

Philistines were gathered together on that day when blind Samson "took

hold of the two middle pillars," and let down the roof, and caught so

many swallows.

According to an ancient fable, preserved by Berosus, this is what was

known of Dagon. In the first year, there appeared, coming out of that

part of the Erythraean Sea which borders upon Babylonia, an animal whose

whole body was that of a fish; but under the fish's head he had another

head, with feet below similar to those of a man, subjoined to the fish's

tail. His voice was articulate and human, and he taught men to construct

cities, to found temples, compile laws,--indeed, taught them everything

that could tend to soften them from a state of natural barbarism; and

hence he was called Oannes, a name that signified "the Enlightener"; and

this name journeying westward became contracted into _On_, and had

prefixed to it the _Dag_, signifying _a fish_, and so became Dagon.

An image of Oannes is mentioned by Berosus as preserved in his time, and

one has been found on the walls of Nimroud. In the ruins near Khorsabad

was found another of Dagon in his final Phoenician form. Engravings of

both these may be seen in "Nineveh and its Palaces."

In the story of Oannes we have probably the account preserved by a rude

people of the advent among them at a very early period of one more

enlightened than themselves; just as the Peruvians accounted in their

peculiar way for the coming of Manco Capac. He comes also from a land

farther east, by the Persian Gulf. These people were at the time very

likely ignorant of even the most rudimentary navigation, and hence

coming by water he was to them a fish indeed.

The incarnation of Brahma as a fish--the Matsya Avatar--is recounted in

much Sanscrit; but it appears to be only a symbolical reference to a

great division of Nature,--a heathen assertion of God in the sea, as

well as elsewhere. The same is true of the marine deities of Greece and

Rome, which were not fishy, though the words Triton and Nereid have led

to misconception, as in relation to those words it is necessary to

understand a distinction that has not always been made. The mythological

Triton was one,--a sea-god subordinate to Poseidon, and played a

conspicuous part in Deucalion's flood. He is pictured by Ovid as

carrying a horn, and wearing a Tynan robe, that may be construed into a

blue jacket,--which would make him the original sailor. The Nereids were

fifty. They were the daughters of Nereus, and, pursued by the fifty sons

of AEgyptus, could find rest in no land, and became wanderers upon the

sea, and at length sea-nymphs. Each had a special, besides the general

name.

There does, however, appear to have been a "fishy composure" held sacred

by the Greeks: this was the _Pompilus_, "Pompilus," says Apollonius

Rhodius, "was originally a man, and he was changed into a fish on

account of a love-affair of Apollo's. They say that Apollo fell in love

with a beauty named Ocyrhoe, and that, when she had crossed over to

Miletus, at the time of a festival, and was afraid to return lest the

god should attack her, she induced Pompilus, a sailor, and friend to her

father, to see her safely home; and that he led her down to the shore

and embarked, when Apollo appeared, took the maiden, sunk the ship, and

metamorphosed Pompilus into a fish." Others assert this fish to have

sprung at the same time with Aphrodite, and from the same heavenly

blood. What fish it was it is scarcely possible to say; but that there

was a fish bearing this name held sacred by the Greeks is certain.

The Triton, in which the ancients believed as part of the physical

world, was a different being from the deity. He was the classical

Merman. The term _Nereid_ was used confusedly to express the female of

the Triton, or the Mermaid.

The passage, in his "Natural History," where Pliny speaks of the Triton,

indicates that the existence of such an animal was not universally

admitted. It is prefaced thus:--"The vulgar notion may very possibly be

true, that whatever is produced in any other department of Nature may be

found in the sea as well." We are then told that a deputation of persons

from Olisipo, (the present Lisbon,) that had been sent for the purpose,

brought word to the Emperor Tiberius that a Triton had been both seen

and heard in a certain cavern, blowing a conch-shell, and that he was of

the form in which Tritons are usually represented.

This is so simple and meagre as to read like an extract from some diary

or annals; and the mere existence of such a passage seems to be good

evidence that something, at the least, like a Triton, was certainly

seen. For Pliny was sufficiently near to this time to know whether such

a deputation had come to Rome, and would scarcely have volunteered a

falsehood; so that the deputation may reasonably be granted. Then the

distance from Lisbon to Rome was so great, particularly in that

ante-railroad time, and the general interest in the Merman so little,

that it does not seem possible a deputation should be sent that distance

"for the purpose" only of presenting this information, unless the proof

of the object seen was of the most convincing character to those by whom

the deputation was sent.

It is to be regretted that Pliny did not give at more length the

statement of this early scientific commission. He does not leave the

subject immediately, however, but says,--

"I have some distinguished informants of equestrian rank, who state that

they themselves once saw in the Ocean of Gades a sea-man which bore in

every part of his body a perfect resemblance to a human being; and that

during the night he would climb up into ships, upon which the side of

the vessel where he seated himself would instantly sink downward, and,

if he remained there any considerable time, even go under water."

Gades was Cadiz, and the Ocean of Gades was that part of the Atlantic

lying south and west of Spain and west of Africa. The statement of the

Merman's boarding a ship is, a little singularly, to be found as well in

the ballad of the "Merman Rosmer," which comes into English from a

Scandinavian source. The effect of his boarding a ship is identical

also. He would seem to have been a heavy fellow, North and South.

"Nor yet," says Pliny, still on the same subject, "is the figure

generally attributed to the Nereids [Mermaids] at all a fiction; only in

them the portion of the body that resembles the human figure is still

rough all over with scales. For one of these creatures was seen upon the

same shores, [Ocean of Gades,] and as it died its plaintive murmurs were

heard, even by the inhabitants at a distance. The legates of Gaul, too,

wrote word to the late Emperor Augustus, that a considerable number of

Nereids had been found dead upon the sea-shore."

Entire faith in the scales is not exacted of the reader, and the weight

of authority, especially scientific, is against them. No marine mammals

have scales. There is, of course, no knowing what they may have had. The

statement of what the legates of Gaul wrote to the Emperor is of most

consequence in this extract, and it is perhaps out of a natural respect

for authority that we are inclined to give most weight to these official

communications. Officials, it is true, have sometimes erred; but these

officials agree with others, and to be stranded has been a common

misfortune of mermen and maids.

Alexander of Alexandria, the good Bishop who had so healthy an

abhorrence of Arianism, _saw_ (upon his own authority) a Nereid

(Mermaid) that had been thrown ashore on the coast of the Peloponnesus.

Seeing was believing; and if the Bishop was right in so many things, all

the way up to Divinity, is it possible that he could be wrong in the

mere fact of a dead animal? Or if he was wrong in this particular, is

not the whole question as to the right or wrong of Arianism opened

again?

A mermaid was stranded in 1403 near Haerlem,--driven ashore by a

tempest, said one Meyer, a Dutchman. It was brought to feed upon bread

and milk, taught to spin, and lived for many years. John Gerard of

Leyden adds, that she would frequently pull off her clothes and run

toward the water, and that her speech was so confused a noise as not to

be understood by anybody. She was buried in the churchyard, because she

had learned to make the sign of the cross. They had much consideration

for a possible soul in those days.

Gerard spoke this upon the credit of several persons who had seen her.

We find noted by another author, that, "in the fifteenth century, after

a dreadful tempest on the coast of Holland, a mermaid was found

struggling in the mud, near Edam, in West Friesland; whence it was

carried to Haerlem, where it lived some years, was clothed in female

apparel, and, it is said, was taught to spin." This was apparently the

same.

This creature is said to have run,--a thing somewhat inconsistent with a

caudal termination,--and she must be supposed, therefore, to be of the

Wild-Man-of-the-Sea family rather than of the half-man, half-fish. She

was, perhaps, a relative of this next, recorded in an ancient English

chronicle:--

"In the time of King Henry I., when Bartholomew de Glanville was warden

of Oxford Castle, the fishermen took in their nets a wild man, having

the human shape complete, with horns on his head, and long and pick

beard, and a great deal of shaggy hair on his breast; but he stole away

to sea privately, and was never seen afterwards."

He wished, evidently, to avoid the embarrassment of the farewell.

Another of these footed sea-men makes his appearance in the book of

Gellius on Animals. Therein is recounted the history, as far as landsmen

knew it, of a Triton that used to come ashore on the coast of Epirus,

and lie in wait by a well but a short distance from the sea, and who,

when the country girls came to the well for water, would leap out and

seize them, and bear them away beneath the waves; and not able to

conceive the peculiarity of the human lungs that lurked beneath their

beautiful bosoms, many a one the wretch thus drowned in his passionate

admiration. Beautiful Greek girls! with such limbs as have come down in

marble! Life under the sea seems favorable to the perfection of a

correct taste.

_Mem._--The reader is not at liberty to doubt this Triton. Draconetus

Bonifacius, a Neapolitan, subsequently saw him preserved in honey.

In 1560 the fishermen of Ceylon caught seven of these sea-people of both

sexes. They were seen by many Portuguese gentlemen then at Menar, and,

among the rest, by Dimaz Bosquez, physician to the Viceroy of Goa, who

minutely examined them, made dissections, and asserted that the

principal parts, internal and external, were conformable to those of the

human species.[A]

In the reign of Roger, King of Sicily, a young man swimming in the sea,

one night, perceived that something followed him. He thought it one of

his companions, but caught it by the hair, and dragged it on shore. It

was a maiden of great beauty! He threw his cloak about her, and took her

to his home. There she lived with him and bore a son. But he was

continually troubled that one so beautiful should be dumb; for she had

never spoken. One day a companion jeered at the spectre that he had at

home, and, angry and terrified, he urged her to tell him who or what she

was, and threatened with his sword to kill the child before her, if she

did not. Then she said that he had lost a good wife by forcing her to

speak; and she vanished. A few years after, when the son was playing on

the shore, his mother dragged him into the sea, and he was drowned.

In the South of France a belief prevails in beings called Dracs, who

have apparently a complete human form, and who inhabit indifferently the

rivers or the sea. Gervase of Tilbury has recorded several instances of

their appearance, of which the following is one:--

"There is on the banks of the Rhone, under a guard-house at the north

gate of the city of Arles, a great pool of the river. In these deep

places they say that the Dracs are often seen of bright nights. A few

years ago, there was, for three successive days, openly heard the

following words in the place outside the gate of the city which I have

mentioned, while the figure, as it were, of a man ran along the

bank,--'The hour is past, and the man does not come!' On the third day,

about the ninth hour, while the figure of a man raised his voice higher

than usual, a young man ran swiftly to the bank, plunged in, and was

swallowed up, and the voice was heard no more."

The depths of the sea appear to be the Fairy Land of France, and the

French Mermaids merely fairies. Such is their character in popular

ballads of Provence. Among popular legends of Brittany, "The Groac'h of

the Isle of Lok" is peculiarly striking, but withal merely a fairy

story,--the Groac'h being a first cousin at least of Undine and the

Lorelei. Yet in Brittany another Mermaid--Morgan, or Morverc'h,

sea-woman, or sea-daughter--sings and combs its golden hair by the

noontide sun at the edge of the ocean.

The Irish Moruach, or Merrow, seamaid, is the _bona fide_ Mermaid, and

some families in the South of Ireland are said to claim descent from

them. There are numerous legends.

Mermaids are plentiful in all accounts of Norway; and Aldrovandus gives

the portrait of one that was captured in the Baltic, and presented to

Sigismund, King of Poland. It lived several days, and was seen by all

his court. Aldrovandus gives also the picture of a Merman who, in his

natural condition, had the appearance of being clothed in a bishop's

frock, and of another with horns, which was a peculiarity of the one

taken in England somewhat earlier.

In Scandinavian mythology every division of Nature is peopled with its

peculiar spirits, and all have a longing, mournful desire for salvation.

A river-spirit, or Nek, once asked a priest if he would likely be saved.

"Sooner," answered the priest, "will this cane which I hold in my hand

grow green flowers than thou attain salvation."

The spirit wept mournfully, and the priest passed on. But in a little

while his cane actually bloomed, and put forth leaves and blossoms, and

he went back and told the spirit, who then sang and rejoiced all night.

The Havmand is the Merman; the Havfrue, the Mermaid. They are handsome,

rather beneficent than evil, though occasionally both are treacherous.

"Fishermen sometimes see the Mermaid in the bright summer sun, when a

thin mist hangs over the sea, sitting on the surface of the water, and

combing her long, golden hair with a golden comb, or driving up her

snow-white cattle to feed on the islands. At other times she comes as a

beautiful maiden, chilled and shivering with the cold of night, to the

fires the fishers have, hoping by this means to entice them to her

love."

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 16, No. 93, July, 1865 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 12 / 20 段