CHAPTER XXIX.

_BEGINNINGS._

NEHEMIAH xii. 27-47.

A curious feature of the history of the restoration of Israel already

met with several times is postponement. Thus in the days of Cyrus

Zerubbabel leads up an expedition for the express purpose of building

the temple at Jerusalem; but the work is not executed until the reign

of Darius. Again, Ezra brings the book of The Law with him when he

comes to the city; yet he does not find an opportunity for publishing

it till some years later. Once more, Nehemiah sets to work on the

fortifications with the promptitude of a practical man and executes

his task with astonishing celerity; still, even in his case the usual

breach of sequence occurs; here, too, we have interruption and the

intrusion of alien matters, so that the crowning act of the dedication

of the walls is delayed.

In this final instance we do not know how long a postponement there

was. Towards the end of his work the chronicler is exceptionally

abrupt and disconnected. In the section xii. 27-43 he gives us an

extract from Nehemiah's memoirs, but without any note of time. The

preservation of another bit of the patriot's original writing is

interesting, not only because of its assured historicity, but further

because exceptional importance is given to the records that have been

judged worthy of being extracted and made portions of permanent

scripture, although other sources are only used by the chronicler as

materials out of which to construct his own narrative in the third

person. While we cannot assign its exact date to the subject of this

important fragment, one thing is clear from its position in the story

of the days of Nehemiah. The reading of The Law, the great fast, the

sealing of the covenant, the census, and the regulations for peopling

Jerusalem, all came between the completion of the fortifications and

the dedication of them. The interruption and the consequent delay were

not without meaning and object. After what had occurred in the

interval, the people were better prepared to enter into the ceremony

of dedication with intelligence and earnestness of purpose. This act,

although it was immediately directed to the wall, was, as a matter of

fact, the re-consecration of the city; because the walls were built in

order to preserve the distinct individuality, unique integrity of what

they included. Now the Jews needed to know The Law in order to

understand the destiny of Jerusalem; they needed to devote themselves

personally to the service of God, so that they might carry out that

destiny; and they needed to recruit the forces of the Holy City, for

the purpose of giving strength and volume to its future. Thus the

postponement of the dedication made that event, when it came about, a

much more real thing than it would have been if it had followed

immediately on the building of the walls. May we not say that in every

similar case the personal consecration must precede the material? The

city is what its citizens make it. They, and not its site or its

buildings, give it its true character. Jerusalem and Babylon, Athens

and Rome, are not to be distinguished in their topography and

architecture in anything approaching the degree in which they are

individualised by the manners and deeds of their respective peoples.

Most assuredly the New Jerusalem will just reflect the characters of

her citizens. This City of God will be fair and spotless only when

they who tread her streets are clad in the beauty of holiness. In

smaller details, too, and in personal matters, we can only dedicate

aright that which we are handling in a spirit of earnest devotion. The

miserable superstition that clouds our ideas of this subject rises out

of the totally erroneous notion that it is possible to have holy

things without holy persons, that a mystical sanctity can attach

itself to any objects apart from an intelligent perception of some

sacred purpose for which they are to be used. This materialistic

notion degrades religion into magic; it is next door to fetichism.

It is important, then, that we should understand what we mean by

dedication. Unfortunately in our English Bible the word "dedicate" is

made to stand for two totally distinct Hebrew terms, one[247] of which

means to "consecrate," to make holy, or set apart for God; while the

other[248] means to "initiate," to mark the beginning of a thing. The

first is used of functions of ritual, priestly and sacrificial; but

the second has a much wider application, one that is not always

directly connected with religion. Thus we meet with this second word

in the regulations of Deuteronomy which lay down the conditions on

which certain persons are to be excused from military service. The man

who has built a new house but who has not "dedicated" it is placed

side by side with one who has planted a vineyard and with a third who

is on the eve of his marriage.[249] Now the first word--that

describing real consecration--is used of the priests' action in regard

to their portion of the wall, and in this place our translators have

rendered it "sanctified."[250] But in the narrative of the general

dedication of the walls the second and more secular word is used. The

same word is used, however, we must notice, in the account of the

dedication of the temple.[251] In both these cases, and in all other

cases of the employment of the word, the chief meaning conveyed by it

is just initiation.[252] It signalises a commencement. Therefore the

ceremony at the new walls was designed in the first instance to direct

attention to the very fact of their newness, and to call up those

thoughts and feelings that are suitable in the consideration of a time

of commencement. We must all acknowledge that such a time is one for

very earnest thought. All our beginnings in life--the birth of a

child, a young man's start in the world, the wedding that founds the

home, the occupation of a new house, the entrance on a fresh line of

business--all such beginnings come to rouse us from the indifference

of routine, to speak to us with the voice of Providence, to bid us

look forward and prepare ourselves for the future. We have rounded a

corner, and a new vista has opened up to our view. As we gaze down the

long aisle we must be heedless indeed if we can contemplate the vision

without a thrill of emotion, without a thought of anticipation. The

new departure in external affairs is an opportunity for a new turn in

our inner life, and it calls for a reconsideration of our resources

and methods.

[247] {~HEBREW LETTER QOF~}{~HEBREW LETTER DALET~}{~HEBREW LETTER SHIN~}

Piel of {~HEBREW LETTER QOF~}{~HEBREW LETTER DALET~}

{~HEBREW LETTER SHIN~}

[248] {~HEBREW LETTER HET~}{~HEBREW POINT QAMATS~}{~HEBREW LETTER NUN~}

{~HEBREW POINT PATAH~}{~HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF~}

{~HEBREW POINT SHEVA~}

[249] Deut. xx. 5-7.

[250] Neh, iii. 1.

[251] Ezra vi. 16.

[252] Still in the earlier scene, the dedication of the temple, the

sacred use of the building makes the act of initiation to be

equivalent to consecration. There the connection gives the special

association.

One of the charms of the Bible is that, like nature, it is full of

fresh starts. Inasmuch as a perennial breath of new life plays among

the pages of these ancient scriptures, we have only to drink it in to

feel what inspiration there is here for every momentous beginning.

Just as the fading, dank autumn gives way to the desolation of winter

in order that in due time the sleeping seeds and buds may burst out in

the birth of spring with the freshness of Eden, God has ordained that

the decaying old things of human life shall fall away and be

forgotten, while He calls us into the heritage of the new--giving a

new covenant, creating a new heart, promising a new heaven and a new

earth. The mistake of our torpor and timidity is that we will cling to

the rags of the past and only patch them with shreds of the later age,

instead of boldly flinging them on to clothe ourselves in the new

garment of praise which is to take the place of the old spirit of

heaviness.

The method in which a new beginning was celebrated by the Jews in

relation to their restored walls is illustrative of the spirit in

which such an event should always be contemplated.

In the first place, as a preparation for the whole of the subsequent

ceremonies, the priests and Levites carried out a great work of

purification. They began with themselves, because the men who are

first in any dealings with religion must be first in purity. Judged by

the highest standard, the only real difference of rank in the Church

is determined by varying degrees of holiness; merely official

distinctions and those that arise from the unequal distribution of

gifts cannot affect anybody's position of honour in the sight of God.

The functions of the recognised ministry, in particular, demand purity

of character for their right discharge. They that bear the vessels of

the Lord must be clean. And not only so in general; especially in the

matter of purification is it necessary that those who carry out the

work should first be pure themselves. What here applied to priests and

Levites ceremonially applies in prosaic earnest to all who feel called

to purge society in the interest of true morality. Who can bring a

clean thing out of an unclean? The leaders of moral reforms must be

themselves morally clean. Only regenerate men and women can regenerate

society. If the salt has lost its savour it will not arrest corruption

in the sacrifice that is salted with it. But the purification does not

cease with the leaders. In ceremonial symbolism all the people and

even the very walls are also cleansed. This is done in view of the new

departure, the fresh beginning. Such an occasion calls for much

heart-searching and spiritual cleansing--a truth which must have been

suggested to the minds of thoughtful people by the Levitical

ceremonies. It is a shame to bring the old stains into the new scenes.

The fresh, clean start calls for a new and better life.

Next, it is to be observed, there was an organised procession round

the walls, a procession that included citizens of every rank--princes,

priests, Levites, and representatives of the general community,

described as "Judah and Benjamin." Starting at the west end of the

city, these people were divided into two sections, one led by Nehemiah

going round by the north, and the other conducted by Ezra proceeding

by the south, so that they met at the eastern side of the city; where

opposite the Mount of Olives and close to the temple, they all united

in an enthusiastic outburst of praise. This arrangement was not

carried out for any of the idle ends of a popular pageant--to glorify

the processionists, or to amuse the spectators. It was to serve an

important practical purpose. By personal participation in the ceremony

of initiation, all sections of the community would be brought to

perceive its real significance. Since the walls were in the keeping of

the citizens, it was necessary that the citizens should acknowledge

their privileges and responsibilities. Men and women need to come

individually and directly face to face with new conditions of life.

Mere dulness of imagination encourages the lazy sense of indifference

with which so many people permit themselves to ignore the claims of

duty, and the same cause accounts for a melancholy failure to

appreciate the new blessings that come from the untiring bounty of

God.

In the third place, the behaviour of the processionists invites our

attention. The whole ceremony was one of praise and gratitude. Levites

were called in from the outlying towns and villages where they had got

themselves homes, and even from that part of the Jordan valley that

lay nearest to Jerusalem. Their principal function was to swell the

chorus of the temple singers. Musical instruments added emphasis to

the shout of human voices; clashing cymbals and finer toned harps

supported the choral song with a rich and powerful orchestral

accompaniment, which was augmented from another quarter by a young

band of trumpeters consisting of some of the priests' sons. The

immediate aim of the music and singing was to show forth the praises

of God. The two great companies were to give thanks while they went

round the walls. Sacrifices of thanksgiving completed the ceremony

when the processions were united and brought to a standstill near the

temple. The thanksgiving would arise out of a grateful acknowledgment

of the goodness of God in leading the work of building the walls

through many perils and disappointments to its present consummation.

Rarely does anything new spring up all of a sudden without some

relation to our own past life and action; but even that which is the

greatest novelty and wonder to us must have a cause somewhere. If we

have done nothing to prepare for the happy surprise, God has done

much. Thus the new start is an occasion for giving thanks to its great

Originator. But the thankfulness also looks forward. The city was now

in a very much more hopeful condition than when Nehemiah took his

lonely night ride among its ghostly ruins. By this time it was a

compact and strongly fortified centre, with solid defences and a good

body of devoted citizens pledged to do their part in pursuing its

unique destiny. The prospect of a happy future which this wonderful

transformation suggested afforded sufficient reasons for the greatest

thankfulness. The spirit of praise thus called forth would be one of

the best guarantees of the fulfilment of the high hopes that it

inspired. There is nothing that so surely foredooms people to failure

as a despairing blindness to any perception of their advantages. The

grateful soul will always have most ground for a renewal of gratitude.

It is only just and reasonable that God should encourage those of His

children who acknowledge His goodness, with fresh acts of favour over

and above what He does for all in making His sun to shine and His rain

to fall on the bad as well as the good. But apart from considerations

of self-interest, the true spirit of praise will delight to pour

itself out in adoration of the great and good Father of all blessings.

It is a sign of sin or selfishness or unbelief when the element of

praise fails in our worship. This is the purest and highest part of a

religious service, and it should take the first place in the

estimation of the worshippers. It will do so directly a right sense of

the goodness of God is attained. Surely the best worship is that in

which man's needs and hopes and fears are all swallowed up in the

vision of God's love and glory, as the fields and woods are lost in a

dim purple haze when the sky is aglow with the rose and saffron of a

brilliant sunset.

Further, it is to be observed that a note of gladness rings through

the whole ceremony. The account of the dedication concludes with the

perfectly jubilant verse, "And they offered great sacrifices that day,

and rejoiced; for God had made them rejoice with great joy; and the

women also and the children rejoiced: so that the joy of Jerusalem was

heard even afar off."[253] The joy would be mingled with the praise,

because when people see the goodness of God enough to praise Him from

their hearts they cannot but rejoice; and then the joy would react on

the praise, because the more blessedness God sends the more heartily

must His grateful children thank Him. Now the outburst of joy was

accompanied with sacrifices. In the deepest sense, a sense almost

unknown till it was revealed by Christ, there is a grand, solemn joy

in sacrifice. But even to those who have only reached the Jewish

standpoint, the self-surrender expressed by a ceremonial sacrifice as

a symbol of glad thankfulness in turn affects the offerer so as to

heighten his gladness. No doubt there were mundane and secular

elements in this joy of a jubilant city. A laborious and dangerous

task had been completed; the city had been fortified and made able to

defend itself against the horrors of an assault; there was a fair

prospect of comfort and perhaps even honour for the oppressed and

despised citizens of Jerusalem. But beyond all this and beneath it,

doubtless many had discovered Nehemiah's great secret for themselves;

they had found their strength in the joy of the Lord. In face of

heathenish pleasures and superstitious terrors it was much to know

that God expected His holy people to be happy, and more, to find that

the direct road to happiness was holiness. This was the best part of

the joy which all the people experienced with more or less thought and

appreciation of its meaning. Joy is contagious. Here was a city full

of gladness. Nehemiah expressly takes note of the fact that the women

and children shared in the universal joy. They must have been among

the most pitiable sufferers in the previous calamities; and they had

taken their place in the great _Ecclesia_ when The Law was read, and

again when the sad confession of the nation's sin was poured forth. It

was well that they should not be left out of the later scene, when joy

and praise filled the stage. For children especially who would not

covet this gladness in religion? It is only a miserable

short-sightedness that allows any one to put before children ideas of

God and spiritual things which must repel, because of their gloom and

sternness. Let us reserve these ideas for the castigation of

Pharisees. A scene of joyous worship is truly typical of the perfect

City of God of which children are the typical citizens--the New

Jerusalem of whose inhabitants it is said, "God shall wipe away all

tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither

sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain; for the

former things are passed away."

[253] Neh. xii. 43.

Lastly, following his extract from the memoirs of Nehemiah, the

chronicler shows how the glad spirit of this great day of dedication

flowed out and manifested itself in those engagements to which he was

always delighted to turn--the Levitical services. Thus the tithe

gathering and the temple psalmody were helped forward. The gladness of

religion is not confined to set services of public worship; but when

those services are held it must flood them with the music of praise.

It is impossible for the worship of God's house to be limp and

depressed when the souls of His children are joyous and eager. A

half-hearted, melancholy faith may be content with neglected churches

and slovenly services--but not a joyous religion which men and women

love and glory in. While "The joy of the Lord" has many happy effects

on the world, it also crowds churches, fills treasuries, sustains

various ministries, inspires hymns of praise, and brings life and

vigour into all the work of religion.

The Expositor's Bible: Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther · 第 29 / 35 章