It was a blasphemous and a sottish extravagance, that of Caius Cæsar,

who challenged Jupiter for making such a noise with his _thunder_, that

he could not hear his mimics, and so invented a machine in imitation

of it to oppose _thunder_ to _thunder_; a brutal conceit, to imagine,

either that he could reach the Almighty, or that the Almighty could not

reach him!

And every jot as ridiculous, though not so impious, was that of Cyrus;

who, in his design upon Babylon, found a river in his way that put a

stop to his march: the current was strong, and carried away one of the

horses that belonged to his own chariot: upon this he swore, that since

it had obstructed _his_ passage, it should never hinder any body’s

else; and presently set his whole army to work upon it, which diverted

it into a hundred and fourscore channels, and laid it dry. In this

ignoble and unprofitable employment he lost his time, and the soldiers

their courage, and gave his adversaries an opportunity of providing

themselves, while he was waging war with a river instead of an enemy.

CHAPTER VIII.

ADVICE IN THE CASES OF CONTUMELY AND REVENGE.

Of provocations to anger there are two sorts; there is an _injury_,

and there is a _contumely_. The former in its own nature is the

heavier; the other slight in itself, and only troublesome to a wounded

imagination. And yet some there are that will bear blows, and death

itself, rather than contumelious words. A contumely is an indignity

below the consideration of the very law; and not worthy either of

a revenge, or so much as a complaint. It is only the vexation and

infirmity of a weak mind, as well as the practice of a haughty and

insolent nature, and signifies no more to a wise and sober man than

an idle dream, that is no sooner past than forgotten. It is true, it

implies contempt; but what needs any man care for being contemptible

to others, if he be not so to himself? For a child in the arms to

strike the mother, tear her hair, claw the face of her, and call her

names, that goes for nothing with us, because the child knows not what

he does. Neither are we moved at the impudence and bitterness of a

_buffoon_, though he fall upon his own master as well as the guests;

but, on the contrary, we encourage and entertain the freedom.

Are we not mad then, to be delighted and displeased with the same

thing, and to take that as an _injury_ from one man, which passes only

for a _raillery_ from another? He that is wise will behave himself

toward all men as we do to our children; for they are but children

too, though they have gray hairs: they are indeed of a larger size,

and their errors are grown up with them; they live without rule, they

covet without choice, they are timorous and unsteady; and if at any

time they happen to be quiet, it is more out of fear than reason. It

is a wretched condition to stand in awe of everybody’s tongue; and

whosoever is vexed at a reproach would be proud if he were commended.

We should look upon contumelies, slanders, and ill words, only as the

clamor of enemies, or arrows shot at a distance, that make a clattering

upon our arms, but do no execution. A man makes himself less than his

adversary by fancying that he is contemned. Things are only ill that

are ill taken; and it is not for a man of worth to think himself better

or worse for the opinion of others. He that thinks himself injured, let

him say, “Either I have deserved this, or I have not. If I have, it is

a judgment; if I have not, it is an injustice: and the doer of it has

more reason to be ashamed than the sufferers.”

Nature has assigned every man his post, which he is bound in honor to

maintain, let him be never so much pressed. Diogenes was disputing of

anger, and an insolent young fellow, to try if he could put him beside

his philosophy, spit in his face: “Young man,” says Diogenes, “this

does not make me angry yet; but I am in some doubt whether I should be

so or not.” Some are so impatient that they cannot bear a contumely,

even from a woman; whose very beauty, greatness, and ornaments, are all

of them little enough to vindicate her from any indecencies, without

much modesty and discretion; nay, they will lay it to heart even from

the meanest of servants. How wretched is that man whose peace lies at

the mercy of the people?

A physician is not angry at the intemperance of a mad patient; nor does

he take it ill to be railed at by a man in a fever; just so should a

wise man treat all mankind as a physician does his patient; and looking

upon them only as sick and extravagant, let their words and actions,

whether good or bad, go equally for nothing, attending still his duty

even in the coarsest offices that may conduce to their recovery. Men

that are proud, froward, and powerful, he values their scorn as little

as their quality, and looks upon them no otherwise than as people in

the excess of a fever. If a beggar worships him, or if he takes no

notice of him, it is all one to him; and with a rich man he makes it

the same case. Their honors and their injuries he accounts much alike;

without rejoicing at the one, or grieving at the other.

In these cases, the rule is to pardon all offenses, where there is any

sign of repentance, or hope of amendment. It does not hold in injuries

as in benefits, the requiting of the one with the other; for it is

a shame to overcome in the one, and in the other to be overcome. It

is the part of a great mind to despise injuries; and it is one kind

of revenge to neglect a man as not worth it: for it makes the first

aggressor too considerable. Our philosophy, methinks, might carry us

up to the bravery of a generous mastiff, that can hear the barking of

a thousand curs without taking any notice of them. He that receives

an injury from his superior, it is not enough for him to bear it with

patience, and without any thought of revenge, but he must receive it

with a cheerful countenance, and look as if he did not understand it

too; for if he appear too sensible, he shall be sure to have more of

it. “It is a damned humor in great men, that whom they wrong they will

hate.”

It is well answered of an old courtier, that was asked how he kept

so long in favor? “Why,” says he, “by receiving injuries, and crying

your humble servant for them.” Some men take it for an argument of

greatness to have revenge in their power; but so far is he that is

under the dominion of anger from being great, that he is not so much

as free. Not but that anger is a kind of pleasure to some in the act

of revenge; but the very _word_ is _inhuman_, though it may pass for

_honest_. “Virtue,” in short, “is impenetrable, and revenge is only the

confession of an infirmity.”

It is a fantastical humor, that the same jest in private should make us

merry, and yet enrage us in public; nay, we will not allow the liberty

that we take. Some railleries we account pleasant, others bitter: a

conceit upon a _squint-eye_, a _hunch-back_, or any personal defect,

passes for a reproach. And why may we not as well hear it as see it?

Nay, if a man imitates our gait, speech, or any natural imperfection,

it puts us out of all patience; as if the counterfeit were more

grievous than the doing of the thing itself. Some cannot endure to

hear of their age, nor others of their poverty; and they make the

thing the more taken notice of the more they desire to hide it. Some

bitter jest (for the purpose) was broken upon you at the table: keep

better company then. In the freedom of cups, a sober man will hardly

contain himself within bounds. It sticks with us extremely sometimes,

that the porter will not let us in to his great master. Will any but a

madman quarrel with a cur for barking, when he may pacify him with a

crust? What have we to do but to keep further off, and laugh at him?

Fidus Cornelius (a tall slim fellow) fell downright a-crying in the

senate-house at Corbulo’s saying that “he looked like an ostrich.”

He was a man that made nothing of a lash upon his life and manners;

but it was worse than death to him a reflection upon his person. No

man was ever ridiculous to others that laughed at himself first: it

prevents mischief, and it is a spiteful disappointment of those that

take pleasure in such abuses. Vatinius, (a man that was made up for

scorn and hatred, scurrilous and impudent to the highest degree, but

most abusively witty and with all this he was diseased, and deformed to

extremity), his way, was always to make sport with himself, and so he

prevented the mockeries of other people. There are none more abusive

to others than they that lie most open to it themselves; but the humor

goes round, and he that laughs at me to-day will have somebody to laugh

at him to-morrow, and revenge my quarrel. But, however, there are some

liberties that will never go down with some men.

Asiaticus Valerius, (one of Caligula’s particular friends, and a man of

stomach, that would not easily digest an affront) Caligula told him in

public what kind of bedfellow his wife was. Good God! that ever any man

should hear this, or a prince speak it, especially to a man of consular

authority, a friend, and a husband: and in such a manner too as at once

to own his disgust and his adultery. The tribune Chæreas had a weak

broken voice, like an hermaphrodite; when he came to Caligula for the

_word_, he would give him sometimes _Venus_, otherwhiles _Priapus_,

as a slur upon him both ways. Valerius was afterwards the principal

instrument in the conspiracy against him; and Chæreas, to convince him

of his manhood, at one blow cleft him down the chin with his sword.

No man was so forward as Caligula to _break_ a jest, and no man so

unwilling to _bear_ it.

CHAPTER IX.

CAUTIONS AGAINST ANGER IN THE MATTER OF EDUCATION, CONVERSE, AND OTHER

GENERAL RULES OF PREVENTING IT, BOTH IN OURSELVES AND OTHERS.

All that we have to say in particular upon this subject lies under

these two heads: first, that we do not _fall_ into anger; and secondly,

that we do not _transgress in it_. As in the case of our bodies, we

have some medicines to preserve us when we are well, and others to

recover us when we are sick; so it is one thing not to admit it, and

another thing to overcome it. We are, in the first place, to avoid all

provocations, and the beginnings of anger: for if we be once down, it

is a hard task to get up again. When our passion has got the better of

our reason, and the enemy is received into the gate, we cannot expect

that the conqueror should take conditions from the prisoner. And, in

truth, our reason, when it is thus mastered, turns effectually into

passion. A careful education is a great matter; for our minds are

easily formed in our youth, but it is a harder business to cure ill

habits: beside that, we are inflamed by climate, constitution, company,

and a thousand other accidents, that we are not aware of.

The choice of a good nurse, and a well-natured tutor, goes a great

way: for the sweetness both of the blood and of the manners will

pass into the child. There is nothing breeds anger more than a soft

and effeminate education; and it is very seldom seen that either

the mother’s or the school-master’s darling ever comes to good. But

_my young master_, when he comes into the world, behaves himself

like a choleric coxcomb; for flattery, and a great fortune, nourish

touchiness. But it is a nice point so to check the seeds of anger in

a child as not to take off his edge, and quench his spirits; whereof

a principal care must be taken betwixt license and severity, that he

be neither too much emboldened nor depressed. Commendation gives him

courage and confidence; but then the danger is, of blowing him up

into insolence and wrath: so that when to use the bit, and when the

spur, is the main difficulty. Never put him to a necessity of begging

anything basely: or if he does, let him go without it. Inure him to

a familiarity where he has any emulation; and in all his exercises

let him understand that it is generous to overcome his competitor,

but not to hurt him. Allow him to be pleased when he does well, but

not transported; for that will puff him up into too high a conceit

of himself. Give him nothing that he cries for till the dogged fit

is over, but then let him have it when he is quiet; to show him that

there is nothing to be gotten by being peevish. Chide him for whatever

he does amiss, and make him betimes acquainted with the fortune that

he was born to. Let his diet be cleanly, but sparing; and clothe him

like the rest of his fellows: for by placing him upon that equality at

first, he will be the less proud afterward: and, consequently the less

waspish and quarrelsome.

In the next place, let us have a care of temptations that we cannot

resist, and provocations that we cannot bear; and especially of sour

and exceptious company: for a cross humor is contagious. Nor is it all

that a man shall be the better for the example of a quiet conversation;

but an angry disposition is troublesome, because it has nothing else to

work upon. We should therefore choose a sincere, easy, and temperate

companion, that will neither provoke anger nor return it; nor give a

man any occasion of exercising his distempers. Nor is it enough to be

gentle, submissive, and humane, without integrity and plain-dealing;

for flattery is as offensive on the other side. Some men would take a

curse from you better than a compliment. Cælius, a passionate orator,

had a friend of singular patience that supped with him, who had no

way to avoid a quarrel but by saying _amen_ to all that Cælius said.

Cælius, taking this ill: “Say something against me,” says he, “that you

and I may be two;” and he was angry with him because he would not: but

the dispute fell, as it needs must, for want of an opponent.

He that is naturally addicted to anger, let him use a moderate diet,

and abstain from wine; for it is but adding fire to fire. Gentle

exercises, recreations, and sports, temper and sweeten the mind. Let

him have a care also of long and obstinate disputes; for it is easier

not to begin them than to put an end to them. Severe studies are not

good for him either, as _law_, _mathematics_; too much attention preys

upon the spirits, and makes him eager: but _poetry_, _history_ and

those lighter entertainments, may serve him for diversion and relief.

He that would be quiet, must not venture at things out of his reach,

or beyond his strength; for he shall either stagger under the burden,

or discharge it upon the next man he meets; which is the same case in

civil and domestic affairs. Business that is ready and practicable

goes off with ease; but when it is too heavy for the bearer, they fall

both together. Whatsoever we design, we should first take a measure of

ourselves, and compare our force with the undertaking; for it vexes

a man not to go through with his work: a repulse inflames a generous

nature, as it makes one that is _phlegmatic_, _sad_. I have known

some that have advised looking in a glass when a man is in the fit,

and the very spectacle of his own deformity has cured him. Many that

are troublesome in their drink, and know their own infirmity, give

their servant order beforehand to take them away by force for fear

of mischief, and not to obey their masters themselves when they are

hot-headed. If the thing were duly considered we should need no other

cure than the bare consideration of it. We are not angry at madmen,

children, and fools, because they do not know what they do: and why

should not imprudence have an equal privilege in other cases? If a

horse kick, or a dog bite, shall a man kick or bite again? The one,

it is true, is wholly void of reason, but it is also an equivalent

darkness of mind that possesses the other. So long as we are among

men, let us cherish humanity, and so live that no man may be either in

fear or in danger of us. Losses, injuries, reproaches, calumnies, they

are but short inconveniences, and we should bear them with resolution.

Beside that, some people are above our anger, others below it. To

contend with our superiors were a folly, and with our inferiors an

indignity.

There is hardly a more effectual remedy against anger than patience

and consideration. Let but the first fervor abate, and that mist which

darkens the mind will be either lessened or dispelled; a day, nay,

an hour, does much in the most violent cases, and perchance totally

suppresses it; time discovers the truth of things, and turns that

into judgment which at first was anger. Plato was about to strike his

servant, and while his hand was in the air, he checked himself, but

still held it in that menacing posture. A friend of his took notice of

it, and asked him what he meant? “I am now,” says Plato, “punishing of

an angry man;” so that he had left his servant to chastise himself.

Another time his servant having committed a great fault: “Speusippus,”

says he, “do you beat that fellow, for I am angry,” so that he forebore

striking him for the very reason that would have made another man have

done it. “I am angry,” says he, “and shall go further than becomes me.”

Nor is it fit that a servant should be in his power that is not his

own master. Why should any one venture now to trust an angry man with

a revenge, when Plato durst not trust himself? Either he must govern

that, or that will undo him. Let us do our best to overcome it, but let

us, however, keep it close, without giving it any vent. An angry man,

if he gives himself liberty at all times, will go too far. If it comes

once to show itself in the eye or countenance, it has got the better

of us. Nay, we should so oppose it as to put on the very contrary

dispositions; calm looks, soft and slow speech, an easy and deliberate

march, and by little and little, we may possibly bring our thoughts

into sober conformity with our actions. When Socrates was angry, he

would take himself in it, and _speak low_, in opposition to the motions

of his displeasure. His friends would take notice of it; and it was

not to his disadvantage neither, but rather to his credit, that so

many should _know_ that he was angry, and nobody _feel_ it; which

could not have been, if he had not given his friends the same liberty

of admonition which he himself took. And this course should we take;

we should desire our friends not to flatter us in our follies, but to

treat us with all liberties of reprehension, even when we are least

willing to bear it, against so powerful and so insinuating an evil;

we should call for help while we have our eyes in our head, and are

yet masters of ourselves. Moderation is profitable for subjects, but

more for princes, who have the means of executing all that their anger

prompts them to. When that power comes once to be exercised to a common

mischief, it can never long continue; a common fear joining in one

cause all their divided complaints. In a word now, how we may prevent,

moderate, or master this impotent passion in others.

It is not enough to be sound ourselves, unless we endeavor to make

others so, wherein we must accommodate the remedy to the temper of the

patient. Some are to be dealt with by artifice and address: as, for

example, “Why will you gratify your enemies to show yourself so much

concerned? It is not worth your anger: it is below you: I am as much

troubled at it myself as you can be; but you had better say nothing,

and take your time to be even with them.” Anger in some people is to be

openly opposed; in others, there must be a little yielding, according

to the disposition of the person. Some are won by entreaties, others

are gained by mere shame and conviction, and some by delay; a dull way

of cure for a violent distemper, but this must be the last experiment.

Other affections may be better dealt with at leisure; for they proceed

gradually: but this commences and perfects itself in the same moment.

It does not, like other passions, solicit and mislead us, but it runs

away with us by force, and hurries us on with an irresistible temerity,

as well to our own as to another’s ruin: not only flying in the face

of him that provokes us, but like a torrent, bearing down all before

it. There is no encountering the first heat and fury of it: for it is

deaf and mad, the best way is (in the beginning) to give it time and

rest, and let it spend itself: while the passion is too hot to handle,

we may deceive it; but, however, let all instruments of revenge be

put out of the way. It is not amiss sometimes to pretend to be angry

too; and join with him, not only in the opinion of the injury, but in

the seeming contrivance of a revenge. But this must be a person then

that has some authority over him. This is a way to get time, and, by

advising upon some greater punishment to delay the present. If the

passion be outrageous, try what shame or fear can do. If weak, it is no

hard matter to amuse it by strange stories, grateful news, or pleasant

discourses. Deceit, in this case, is friendship; for men must be

cozened to be cured.

The injuries that press hardest upon us are those which either we

have not deserved, or not expected, or, at least, not in so high a

degree. This arises from the love of ourselves: for every man takes

upon him, like a prince, in this case, to practice all liberties, and

to allow none, which proceeds either from ignorance or insolence. What

news is it for people to do ill things? for an enemy to hurt us; nay,

for a friend or a servant to transgress, and to prove treacherous,

ungrateful, covetous, impious? What we find in one man we may in

another, and there is more security in fortune than in men. Our joys

are mingled with fear, and a tempest may arise out of a calm; but a

skilful pilot is always provided for it.

CHAPTER X.

AGAINST RASH JUDGMENT.

It is good for every man to fortify himself on his weak side: and

if he loves his peace he must not be inquisitive, and hearken to

tale-bearers; for the man that is over-curious to hear and see

everything, multiplies troubles to himself: for a man does not

feel what he does not know. He that is listening after private

discourse, and what people say of him, shall never be at peace. How

many things that are innocent in themselves are made injuries yet by

misconstruction! Wherefore, some things we are to pause upon, others to

laugh at, and others again to pardon. Or, if we cannot avoid the sense

of indignities, let us however shun the open profession of it, which

may easily be done, as appears by many examples of those that have

suppressed their anger under the awe of a greater fear. It is a good

caution not to believe any thing until we are very certain of it; for

many probable things prove false, and a short time will make evidence

of the undoubted truth. We are prone to believe many things which

we are willing to hear, and so we conclude, and take up a prejudice

before we can judge. Never condemn a friend unheard; or without letting

him know his accuser, or his crime. It is a common thing to say, “Do

not you tell that you had it from me: for if you do, I will deny

it, and never tell you any thing again:” by which means friends are

set together by the ears, and the informer slips his neck out of the

collar. Admit no stories upon these terms: for it is an unjust thing

to believe in private and to be angry openly. He that delivers himself

up to guess and conjecture runs a great hazard; for there can be no

suspicion without some probable grounds; so that without much candor

and simplicity, and making the best of every thing, there is no living

in society with mankind. Some things that offend us we have by report;

others we see or hear. In the first case, let us not be too credulous:

some people frame stories that they may deceive us; others only tell

what they hear, and are deceived themselves: some make it their sport

to do ill offices, others do them only to pick a thank: there are some

that would part the dearest friends in the world; others love to do

mischief, and stand aloof off to see what comes of it. If it be a small

matter, I would have witnesses; but if it be a greater, I would have

it upon oath, and allow time to the accused, and counsel too, and hear

over and over again.

In those cases where we ourselves are witnesses, we should take into

consideration all the circumstances. If a _child_, it was _ignorance_:

if a _woman_, a _mistake_: if done by _command_ a _necessity_; if a

_man_ be injured, it is but _quod pro quo_: if a _judge_, he _knows_

what he does: if a _prince_, I must _submit_; either if _guilty_, to

_justice_, or if _innocent_, to _fortune_: if a _brute_, I make myself

one by _imitating_ it: if a _calamity_ or _disease_, my best relief

is _patience_: if _providence_, it is both _impious_ and _vain_ to

be _angry_ at it: if a _good_ man, I will make the _best_ of it: if

a _bad_, I will never _wonder_ at it. Nor is it only by _tales_ and

_stories_ that we are inflamed, but _suspicions_, _countenances_, nay,

a _look_ or a _smile_, is enough to blow us up. In these cases, let us

suspend our displeasure, and plead the cause of the absent. “Perhaps

he is innocent; or, if not, I have time to consider of it and may take

my revenge at leisure:” but when it is once _executed_ it is not to

be _recalled_. A jealous head is apt to take that to himself which

was never meant him. Let us therefore trust to nothing but what we

see, and chide ourselves where we are over-credulous. By this course

we shall not be so easily imposed upon, nor put to trouble ourselves

about things not worth the while: as the loitering of a servant upon an

errand, and the tumbling of a bed, or the spilling of a glass of drink.

It is a madness to be disordered at these fooleries; we consider the

thing done, and not the doer of it. “It may be he did it unwillingly,

or by chance. It was a trick put upon him, or he was forced to it. He

did it for reward perhaps, not hatred; nor of his own accord, but he

was urged on to it.” Nay, some regard must be had to the age of the

person, or to fortune; and we must consult humanity and candor in the

case. One does me a _great mischief_ at _unawares_; another does me a

very _small_ one by _design_, or peradventure none at all, but intended

me one. The latter was more in fault, but I will be angry with neither.

We must distinguish betwixt what a man cannot do and what he will not.

“It is true he has once offended me; but how often has he pleased me!

He has offended me often, and in other kinds; and why should not I bear

it as well now as I have done?” Is he my friend? why then, “It was

against his will.” Is he my enemy? It is “no more than I looked for.”

Let us give way to wise men, and not squabble with fools; and say thus

to ourselves, “We have all of us our errors.” No man is so circumspect,

so considerate, or so fearful of offending, but he has much to answer

for.

A generous prisoner cannot immediately comply with all the sordid and

laborious offices of a slave. A footman that is not breathed cannot

keep pace with his master’s horse. He that is over-watched may be

allowed to be drowsy. All these things are to be weighed before we give

any ear to the first impulse. If it be my duty to love my country,

I must be kind also to my countrymen; if a veneration be due to the

whole, so is a piety also to the parts: and it is the common interest

to preserve them. We are all members of one body, and it is as natural

to help one another as for the hands to help the feet, or the eyes the

hands. Without the love and care of the parts, the whole can never

be preserved, and we must spare one another because we are born for

society, which cannot be maintained without a regard to particulars.

Let this be a rule to us, never to deny a pardon, that does no hurt

either to the giver or receiver. That may be well enough in one which

is ill in another; and therefore we are not to condemn anything that is

common to a nation; for custom defends it. But much more pardonable are

those things which are common to mankind.

It is a kind of spiteful comfort, that whoever does me an injury may

receive one; and that there is a power over him that is above me. A man

should stand as firm against all indignities as a rock does against

the waves. As it is some satisfaction to a man in a mean condition

that there is no security in a more prosperous; and as the loss of

a son in a corner is borne with more patience upon the sight of a

funeral carried out of a palace; so are injuries and contempts the more

tolerable from a meaner person, when we consider, that the greatest

men and fortunes are not exempt. The wisest also of mortals have their

failings, and no man living is without the same excuse. The difference

is, that we do not all of us transgress the same way; but we are

obliged in humanity to bear one with another.

We should, every one of us, bethink ourselves, how remiss we have

been in our duties, how immodest in our discourses, how intemperate

in our cups; and why not, as well, how extravagant we have been in

our passions? Let us clear ourselves of this evil, purge our minds,

and utterly root out all those vices, which upon leaving the least

sting, will grow again and recover. We must think of everything, expect

everything, that we may not be surprised. It is a shame, says Fabius,

for a commander to excuse himself by saying, “I was not aware of it.”

CHAPTER XI.

TAKE NOTHING ILL FROM ANOTHER MAN, UNTIL YOU HAVE MADE IT YOUR OWN CASE.

It is not prudent to deny a pardon to any man, without first examining

if we stand not in need of it ourselves; for it may be our lot to ask

it, even at his feet to whom we refuse it. But we are willing enough to

do what we are very unwilling to suffer. It is unreasonable to charge

public vices upon particular persons; for we are all of us wicked,

and that which we blame in others we find in ourselves. It is not a

paleness in one, or a leanness in another, but a pestilence that has

laid hold upon all.

It is a wicked world, and we make part of it; and the way to be quiet

is to bear one with another. “Such a man,” we cry, “has done me a

shrewd turn, and I never did him any hurt.” Well, but it may be I have

mischieved other people, or at least, I may live to do as much to him

as that comes to. “Such a one has spoken ill things of me;” but if I

first speak ill of him, as I do of many others, this is not an injury,

but a repayment. What if he did overshoot himself? He was loth to lose

his conceit perhaps, but there was no malice in it; and if he had

not done me a mischief, he must have done himself one. How many good

offices are there that look like injuries! Nay, how many have been

reconciled and good friends after a professed hatred!

Before we lay anything to heart, let us ask ourselves if we have not

done the same thing to others. But where shall we find an equal judge?

He that loves another man’s wife (only because she is another’s) will

not suffer his own to be so much looked upon. No man is so fierce

against calumny as the evil speaker; none so strict exactors of modesty

in a servant as those that are most prodigal of their own. We carry our

neighbors’ crimes in sight, and we throw our own over our shoulders.

The intemperance of a bad son is chastised by a worse father; and the

luxury that we punish in others, we allow to ourselves. The tyrant

exclaims against homicide; and sacrilege against theft. We are angry

with the persons, but not with the faults.

Some things there are that cannot hurt us, and others will not; as good

magistrates, parents, tutors, judges; whose reproof or correction we

are to take as we do abstinence, bleeding, and other uneasy things,

which we are the better for, in which cases, we are not so much to

reckon upon what we suffer as upon what we have done. “I take it ill,”

says one; and, “I have done nothing,” says another: when, at the same

time, we make it worse, by adding arrogance and contumacy to our first

error. We cry out presently, “What law have we transgressed?” As if the

letter of the law were the sum of our duty, and that piety, humanity,

liberality, justice, and faith, were things beside our business. No,

no; the rule of human duty is of a greater latitude; and we have many

obligations upon us that are not to be found in the _statute-books_.

And yet we fall short of the exactness event of that _legal

innocency_. We have intended one thing and done another; wherein only

the want of success has kept us from being criminals. This very thing,

methinks, should make us more favorable to delinquents, and to forgive

not only ourselves, but the gods too; of whom we seem to have harder

thoughts in taking that to be a particular evil directed to us, that

befalls us only by the common law of mortality. In fine, no man living

can absolve himself to his conscience, though to the world, perhaps, he

may. It is true, that we are also condemned to pains and diseases, and

to death too, which is no more than the quitting of the soul’s house.

But why should any man complain of bondage, that, wheresoever he looks,

has his way open to liberty? That precipice, that sea, that river, that

well, there is freedom in the bottom of it. It hangs upon every crooked

bow; and not only a man’s throat, or his heart, but every vein in his

body, opens a passage to it.

To conclude, where my proper virtue fails me, I will have recourse to

examples, and say to myself, Am I greater than Philip or Augustus, who

both of them put up with greater reproaches? Many have pardoned their

enemies, and shall not I forgive a neglect, a little freedom of the

tongue? Nay, the patience but of a second thought does the business:

for though the first shock be violent; take it in parts, and it is

subdued. And, to wind up all in one word, the great lesson of mankind,

as well in this as in all other cases, is, “to do as we would be done

by.”

CHAPTER XII.

OF CRUELTY.

There is so near an affinity betwixt _anger_ and _cruelty_, that many

people confound them; as if _cruelty_ were only the _execution_ of

_anger_ in the payment of a _revenge_: which holds in some cases,

but not in others. There are a sort of men that take delight in the

spilling of human blood, and in the death of those that never did them

any injury, nor were ever so much suspected for it; as Apollodorus,

Phalaris, Sinis, Procrustus, and others, that burnt men alive; whom

we cannot so properly call _angry_ as _brutal_, for _anger_ does

necessarily presuppose an injury, either _done_, or _conceived_, or

_feared_, but the other takes _pleasure_ in _tormenting_, without so

much as pretending any _provocation_ to it, and _kills_ merely for

_killing sake_. The _original_ of this _cruelty_ perhaps was _anger_,

which by frequent _exercise_ and _custom_, has lost all sense of

_humanity_ and _mercy_, and they that are thus affected are so far

from the countenance and appearance of men in _anger_, that they will

_laugh_, _rejoice_, and _entertain themselves_ with the most _horrid

spectacles_, as _racks_, _jails_, _gibbets_, several sorts of _chains_

and _punishments_, _dilaceration_ of _members_, _stigmatizing_, and

_wild beasts_, with other exquisite inventions of torture; and yet, at

last the cruelty itself is more horrid and odious than the means by

which it works. It is a bestial madness to _love_ mischief; beside,

that it is _womanish_ to _rage_ and _tear_. A generous beast will scorn

to do it when he has any thing at his mercy. It is a vice for wolves

and tigers, and no less _abominable_ to the _world_ than _dangerous_ to

itself.

The Romans had their _morning_ and their _meridian spectacles_. In

the _former_, they had their combats of _men_ with _wild beasts_; and

in the _latter_, the _men_ fought _one with another_. “I went,” says

our author, “the other day to the _meridian spectacles_, in hope of

meeting somewhat of mirth and diversion to sweeten the humors of those

that had been entertained with blood in the _morning_; but it proved

otherwise, for, compared with this inhumanity, the former was a mercy.

The whole business was only murder upon murder: the combatants fought

naked, and every blow was a wound. They do not contend for _victory_,

but for _death_; and he that kills one man is to be killed by another.

By wounds they are forced upon wounds which they take and give upon

their bare _breasts. Burn that rogue_, they cry _What! Is he afraid

of his flesh? Do but see how sneakingly that rascal dies._ Look to

yourselves, my masters, and consider of it: who knows but this may come

to be your own case?” Wicked examples seldom fail of coming home at

last to the authors. To destroy a _single_ man may be dangerous; but

to murder whole nations is only a more _glorious wickedness. Private

avarice_ and _rigor_ are condemned, but _oppression_, when it comes to

be _authorized_ by an act of state, and to be publicly _commanded_,

though particularly forbidden, becomes a point of _dignity_ and

_honor_. What a shame is it for men to interworry one another, when

yet the fiercest even of beasts are at peace with those of their own

kind? This brutal fury puts philosophy itself to a stand. The drunkard,

the glutton, the covetous, may be reduced; nay, and the mischief of

it is that no vice keeps itself within its proper bounds. Luxury runs

into avarice, and when the reverence of virtue is extinguished, men

will stick at nothing that carries profit along with it; man’s blood is

shed in wantonness—his death is a spectacle for entertainment, and his

groans are music. When Alexander delivered up Lysimachus to a lion, how

glad would he have been to have had nails and teeth to have devoured

him himself: it would have too much derogated, he thought, from the

dignity of his wrath, to have appointed a _man_ for the execution of

his friend. Private cruelties, it is true, cannot do much mischief, but

in princes they are a war against mankind.

C. Cæsar would commonly, for _exercise_ and _pleasure_, put _senators_

and _Roman knights_ to the _torture_; and _whip_ several of them like

_slaves_, or put them to _death_ with the most acute _torments_,

merely for the satisfaction of his _cruelty_. That Cæsar that “wished

the people of Rome had but one neck, that he might cut it off at one

blow;”—it was the employment, the study, and the joy of his life. He

would not so much as give the expiring leave to groan, but caused their

mouths to be stopped with sponges, or for want of them, with rags of

their own clothes, that they might not breathe out so much as their

last agonies at liberty; or, perhaps, lest the tormented should speak

something which the tormentor had no mind to hear. Nay, he was so

impatient of delay, that he would frequently rise from supper to have

men killed by _torch-light_, as if his life and death had depended

upon their dispatch before the next morning; to say nothing how many

_fathers_ were put to death in the same night with their _sons_ (which

was a kind of mercy in the prevention of their mourning). And was not

Sylla’s cruelty prodigious too, which was only stopped for want of

enemies? He caused seven thousand _citizens_ of Rome to be slaughtered

at once; and some of the senators being startled at their cries that

were heard in the _senate-house_, “Let us mind our business,” says

Sylla; “this is nothing but a few mutineers that I have ordered to be

sent out of the way.” A _glorious spectacle_! says Hannibal, when he

saw the trenches flowing with human blood; and if the rivers had run

blood too, he would have liked it so much the better.

Among the famous and detestable speeches that are committed to memory,

I know none worse than that impudent and _tyrannical maxim_, “Let them

hate me, so they fear me;” not considering that those that are kept

in obedience by fear, are both malicious and mercenary, and only wait

for an opportunity to change their master. Beside that, whosoever is

terrible to others is likewise afraid of himself. What is more ordinary

than for a tyrant to be destroyed by his own guards? which is no more

than the putting those crimes into practice which they learned of

their masters. How many slaves have revenged themselves of their cruel

oppressors, though they were sure to die for it! but when it comes

once to a _popular tyranny_, whole nations conspire against it. For

“whosoever threatens all, is in danger of all,” over and above, that

the cruelty of the prince increases the _number_ of his enemies, by

destroying some of them; for it entails an hereditary hatred upon the

friends and relations of those that are taken away. And then it has

this misfortune, that a man must be wicked upon necessity; for there

is no going back; so that he must betake himself to arms, and yet he

lives in fear. He can neither trust to the faith of his friends, nor

to the piety of his children; he both dreads death and wishes it; and

becomes a greater terror to himself than he is to his people. Nay, if

there were nothing else to make cruelty detestable, it were enough that

it passes all bounds, both of custom and humanity; and is followed upon

the heel with sword or poison. A private malice indeed does not move

whole cities; but that which extends to all is every body’s mark. One

sick person gives no great disturbance in a family; but when it comes

to a depopulating plague, all people fly from it. And why should a

prince expect any man to be good whom he has taught to be wicked?

But what if it were _safe_ to be _cruel_? Were it not still a sad

thing, the very state of such a _government_? A _government_ that

bears the image of a _taken city_, where there is nothing but

_sorrow_, _trouble_, and _confusion_. Men dare not so much as trust

themselves with their friends or with their pleasures. There is not any

entertainment so innocent but it affords pretence of crime and danger.

People are betrayed at their _tables_ and in their _cups_, and drawn

from the very _theatre_ to the _prison_. How horrid a madness is it

to be still _raging_ and _killing_; to have the rattling of _chains_

always in our _ears; bloody spectacles_ before our _eyes_; and to carry

_terror_ and _dismay_ wherever we go! If we had _lions_ and _serpents_,

to rule over us, this would be the manner of their _government_,

saving that they agree better among themselves. It passes for a mark

of greatness to burn cities, and lay whole kingdoms waste; nor is it

for the honor of a prince, to appoint this or that single man to be

killed, unless they have whole _troops_, or (sometimes) _legions_, to

work upon. But it is not the spoils of _war_ and _bloody trophies_ that

make a prince _glorious_, but the _divine power_ of preserving _unity_

and _peace. Ruin_ without _distinction_ is more properly the business

of a general _deluge_, or a _conflagration_. Neither does a fierce

and inexorable _anger_ become the _supreme magistrate_; “Greatness of

mind is always meek and humble; but cruelty is a note and an effect of

weakness, and brings down a governor to the level of a competitor.”

SENECA OF CLEMENCY.

The humanity and excellence of this virtue is confessed at all hands,

as well by the men of _pleasure_, and those that think every man was

made for himself, as by the Stoics, that make “man a sociable creature,

and born for the common good of mankind:” for it is of all dispositions

the most _peaceable_ and _quiet_. But before we enter any farther upon

the discourse, it should be first known what _clemency_ is, that we may

distinguish it from _pity_; which is a _weakness_, though many times

mistaken for a _virtue_: and the next thing will be, to bring the mind

to the _habit_ and _exercise_ of it.

“Clemency is a favorable disposition of the mind, in the matter of

inflicting punishment; or, a moderation that remits somewhat of the

penalty incurred; as _pardon_ is the total remission of a deserved

punishment.” We must be careful not to confound _clemency_ with

_pity_; for as _religion worships_ God, and _superstition profanes_

that worship; so should we distinguish betwixt _clemency_ and _pity_;

_practicing_ the _one_, and _avoiding_ the _other_. For _pity_ proceeds

from a _narrowness of mind_, that respects rather the _fortune_ than

the _cause_. It is a kind of moral sickness, contracted from other

people’s misfortune: such another weakness as laughing or yawning for

company, or as that of sick eyes that cannot look upon others that are

bleared without dropping themselves. I will give a shipwrecked man a

plank, a lodging to a stranger, or a piece of money to him that wants

it: I will dry up the tears of my friend, yet I will not weep with him,

but treat him with constancy and humanity, as _one man_ ought to treat

_another_.

It is objected by some, that _clemency_ is an insignificant virtue; and

that only the bad are the better for it, for the good have no need of

it. But in the first place, as physic is in use only among the sick,

and yet in honor with the sound, so the innocent have a reverence

for clemency, though criminals are properly the objects of it. And

then again, a man may be innocent, and yet have occasion for it too;

for by the accidents of fortune, or the condition of times, virtue

itself may come to be in danger. Consider the most populous city or

nation; what a solitude would it be if none should be left there but

those that could stand the test of a severe justice! We should have

neither judges nor accusers; none either to grant a pardon or to ask

it. More or less, we are all sinners; and he that has best purged his

conscience, was brought by errors to repentance. And it is farther

profitable to mankind; for many delinquents come to be converted. There

is a tenderness to be used even toward our slaves, and those that we

have bought with our money: how much more then to free and to honest

men, that are rather under our protection than dominion! Not that I

would have it so general neither as not to distinguish betwixt the good

and the bad; for that would introduce a confusion, and give a kind of

encouragement to wickedness. It must therefore have a respect to the

quality of the offender, and separate the curable from the desperate;

for it is an equal cruelty to pardon all and to pardon none. Where

the matter is in balance, let mercy turn the scale: if all wicked men

should be punished, who should escape?

Though mercy and gentleness of nature keeps all in peace and

tranquillity, even in a _cottage_; yet it is much more beneficial

and conspicuous in a _palace. Private men_ in their _condition_ are

likewise _private_ in their _virtues_ and in their _vices_; but the

words and the actions of _princes_ are the subject of _public rumor_;

and therefore they had need have a care, what occasion they give

people for discourse, of whom people will be always a talking. There

is the _government_ of a _prince_ over his _people_, a _father_ over

his _children_, a _master_ over his _scholars_, an _officer_ over his

_soldiers_. He is an unnatural father, that for every trifle beats his

children. Who is the better master, he that rages over his scholars for

but missing a word in a lesson, or he that tries, by admonition and

fair words, to instruct and reform them? An outrageous officer makes

his men run from their colors. A skilful rider brings his horse to

obedience by mingling fair means with foul; whereas to be perpetually

switching and spurring, makes him vicious and jadish: and shall we

not have more care of _men_ than of _beasts_? It breaks the hope of

generous inclinations, when they are depressed by servility and terror.

There is no creature so hard to be pleased with ill usage as man.

Clemency does _well_ with _all_ but _best_ with _princes_; for it makes

their power comfortable and beneficial, which would otherwise be the

pest of mankind. It establishes their greatness, when they make the

good of the public their particular care, and employ their power for

the safety of the people. The prince, in effect, is but the soul of the

community, as the community is only the body of the prince; so that

being merciful to others, he is tender of himself: nor is any man so

mean but his master feels the loss of him, as a part of his empire: and

he takes care not only of the lives of his people, but also of their

reputation. Now, giving for granted that all virtues are in themselves

equal, it will not yet be denied, that they may be more beneficial to

mankind in one person than in another. A beggar may be as magnanimous

as a king: for what can be greater or braver than to baffle ill

fortune? This does not hinder but that a man in authority and plenty

has more matter for his generosity to work upon than a private person;

and it is also more taken notice of upon the bench than upon the level.

When a gracious prince shows himself to his people, they do not fly

from him as from a tiger that rouses himself out of his den, but they

worship him as a benevolent influence; they secure him against all

conspiracies, and interpose their bodies betwixt him and danger. They

guard him while he sleeps, and defend him in the field against his

enemies. Nor is it without reason, this unanimous agreement in love and

loyalty, and this heroical zeal of abandoning themselves for the safety

of their prince; but it is as well the interest of the people. In the

breath of a prince there is life and death; and his sentence stands

good, right or wrong. If he be angry, nobody dares advise him; and if

he does amiss, who shall call him to account? Now, for him that has so

much mischief in his power, and yet applies that power to the common

utility and comfort of his people, diffusing also clemency and goodness

into their hearts too, what can be a greater blessing to mankind than

such a prince? _Any man_ may _kill_ another _against_ the law, but only

a _prince_ can _save_ him so. Let him so deal with his own subjects as

he desires God should deal with him. If Heaven should be inexorable to

sinners, and destroy all without mercy, what flesh could be safe?

But as the faults of great men are not presently punished with thunder

from above, let them have a like regard to their inferiors here upon

earth. He that has revenge in his power, and does not use it, is the

great man. Which is the more beautiful and agreeable state, that of

a calm, a temperate, and a clear day; or that of lightning, thunder,

and tempests? and this is the very difference betwixt a moderate and

turbulent government. It is for low and vulgar spirits to brawl, storm,

and transport themselves: but it is not for the majesty of a prince to

lash out into intemperance of words. Some will think it rather slavery

than empire to be debarred liberty of speech: and what if it be, when

government itself is but a more illustrious servitude?

He that uses his power as he should, takes as much delight in making

it comfortable to his people as glorious to himself. He is affable

and easy of access; his very countenance makes him the joy of his

people’s eyes, and the delight of mankind. He is beloved, defended,

and reverenced by all his subjects; and men speak as well of him in

private as in public. He is safe without guards, and the sword is

rather his ornament than his defence. In his duty, he is like that of a

good father, that sometimes gently reproves a son, sometimes threatens

him; nay, and perhaps corrects him: but no father in his right wits

will disinherit a son for the first fault; there must be many and great

offences, and only desperate consequences, that should bring him to

that decretory resolution. He will make many experiments to try if he

can reclaim him first, and nothing but the utmost despair must put him

upon extremities.

It is not flattery that calls a prince _the father of his country_;

the titles of _great_ and _august_ are matter of compliment and of

honor; but in calling him _father_, we mind him of that moderation and

indulgence which he owes to his children. His subjects are his members;

where, if there must be an amputation, let him come slowly to it; and

when the part is cut off, let him wish it were on again: let him grieve

in the doing of it. He that passes a sentence _hastily_, looks as if he

did it _willingly_; and then there is an injustice in the excess.

It is a glorious contemplation for a prince, first to consider the

vast multitudes of his people, whose seditious, divided, and impotent

passions, would cast all in confusion, and destroy themselves, and

public order too, if the hand of government did not restrain them;

and thence to pass the examination of his conscience, saying thus to

himself, “It is by the choice of Providence that I am here made God’s

deputy upon earth, the arbitrator of life and death; and that upon

my breath depends the fortune of my people. My lips are the oracles

of their fate, and upon them hangs the destiny both of cities and of

men. It is under my favor that people seek either for prosperity or

protection: thousands of swords are drawn or sheathed at my pleasure.

What towns shall be advanced or destroyed; who shall be slaves, or who

free, depends upon my will; and yet, in this arbitrary power of acting

without control, I was never transported to do any cruel thing, either

by anger or hot blood in myself or by the contumacy, rashness, or

provocations of other men; though sufficient to turn mercy itself into

fury. I was never moved by the odious vanity of making myself terrible

by my power, (that accursed, though common humor of ostentation and

glory that haunts imperious natures.) My sword has not only been buried

in the scabbard, but in a manner bound to the peace, and tender even

of the cheapest blood: and where I find no other motive to compassion,

humanity itself is sufficient. I have been always slow to severity, and

prone to forgive; and under as strict a guard to observe the laws as if

I were accountable for the breaking of them. Some I pardoned for their

youth, others for their age. I spare one man for his dignity, another

for his humility; and when I find no other matter to work upon, I spare

myself. So that if God should at this instant call me to an account,

the whole world agree to witness for me, that I have not by any force,

either public or private, either by myself or by any other, defrauded

the commonwealth; and the reputation that I have ever sought for has

been that which few princes have obtained, the conscience of my proper

innocence. And I have not lost my labor neither; for no man was ever so

dear to another, as I have made myself to the whole body of my people.”

Under such a prince the subjects have nothing to wish for beyond what

they enjoy; their fears are quieted, and their prayers heard, and

there is nothing can make their felicity greater, unless to make it

perpetual; and there is no liberty denied to the people but that of

destroying one another.

It is the interest of the people, by the consent of all nations, to run

all hazards for the safety of their prince, and by a thousand deaths to

redeem that one life, upon which so many millions depend. Does not the

whole body serve the mind, though only the one is exposed to the eye

and the other not, but thin and invisible, the very seat of it being

uncertain? Yet the hands, feet, and eyes, observe the motions of it. We

lie down, run about and ramble, as that commands us. If we be covetous,

we fish the seas and ransack the earth for treasure: if ambitious, we

burn our own flesh with Scævola; we cast ourselves into the gulf with

Curtius: so would that vast multitude of people, which is animated but

with one soul, governed by one spirit, and moved by one reason, destroy

itself with its own strength, if it were not supported by wisdom and

government. Wherefore, it is for their own security that the people

expose their lives for their prince, as the very bond that ties the

republic together; the vital spirit of so many thousands, which would

be nothing else but a burden and prey without a governor.

When this union comes once to be dissolved, all falls to pieces; for

empire and obedience must stand and fall together. It is no wonder then

if a prince be dear to his people, when the community is wrapt up in

him, and the good of both as inseparable as the body and the head; the

one for strength, and the other for counsel; for what signifies the

force of the body without the direction of the understanding? While the

prince watches, his people sleep; his labor keeps them at ease, and

his business keeps them quiet. The natural intent of monarchy appears

even from the very discipline of bees: they assign to their master the

fairest lodgings, the safest place; and his office is only to see that

the rest perform their duties. When their king is lost, the whole swarm

dissolve: more than one they will not admit; and then they contend who

shall have the best. They are of all creatures the fiercest for their

bigness; and leave their stings behind them in their quarrels; only

the king himself has none, intimating that kings should neither be

vindictive nor cruel.

Is it not a shame, after such an example of moderation in these

creatures, that men should be yet intemperate? It were well if they

lost their stings too in their revenge, as well as the other, that they

might hurt but once, and do no mischief by their proxies. It would tire

them out, if either they were to execute all with their own hands, or

to wound others at the peril of their own lives.

A prince should behave himself generously in the power which God has

given him of life and death, especially towards those that have been

at any time his equals; for the one has his revenge, and the other his

punishment in it. He that stands indebted for his life has lost it;

but he that receives his life at the foot of his enemy, lives to the

honor of his preserver: he lives the lasting monument of his virtue;

whereas, if he had been led in triumph, the spectacle would have been

quickly over. Or what if he should restore him to his kingdom again?

would it not be an ample accession to his honor to show that he found

nothing about the conquered that was worthy of the conqueror? There is

nothing more venerable than a prince that does not revenge an injury.

He that is gracious is beloved and reverenced as a common father; but a

tyrant stands in fear and in danger even of his own guards. No prince

can be safe himself of whom all others are afraid; for to spare none

is to enrage all. It is an error to imagine that any man can be secure

that suffers nobody else to be so too. How can any man endure to lead

an uneasy, suspicious, anxious life, when he may be safe if he please,

and enjoy all the blessings of power, together with the prayers of

his people? Clemency protects a prince without a guard; there is no

need of troops, castles, or fortifications: security on the one side

is the condition of security on the other; and the affections of the

subject are the most invincible fortress. What can be fairer, than for

a prince to live the object of his people’s love; to have the vows of

their heart as well as of their lips, and his health and sickness their

common hopes and fears? There will be no danger of plots; nay, on the

contrary, who would not frankly venture his blood to save him, under

whose government, justice, peace, modesty, and dignity flourish? under

whose influence men grow rich and happy; and whom men look upon with

such veneration, as they would do upon the immortal gods, if they were

capable of seeing them? And as the true representative of the ALMIGHTY

they consider him, when he is gracious and bountiful, and employs his

power to the advantage of his subjects.

When a prince proceeds to punishment, it must be either to vindicate

himself or others. It is a hard matter to govern himself in his own

case. If a man should advise him not to be credulous, but to examine

matters, and indulge the innocent, this is rather a point of justice

than of clemency: but in case that he be manifestly injured, I would

have him _forgive_, where he may _safely_ do it: and be _tender_ even

where he cannot _forgive_; but far more exorable in his own case,

however, than in another’s.

It is nothing to be free of another man’s purse, and it is as little to

be merciful in another man’s cause. He is the great man that masters

his passion where he is stung himself, and pardons when he might

destroy. The end of punishment is either to comfort the party injured,

or to secure him for the future. A prince’s fortune is above the need

of such a comfort, and his power is too eminent to seek an advance of

reputation by doing a private man a mischief. This I speak in case of

an affront from those that are below us; but he that of an equal has

made any man his inferior, has his revenge in the bringing of him down.

A _prince_ has been _killed_ by a _servant_, destroyed by a serpent:

but whosoever preserves a man must be greater than the person that he

preserves. With citizens, strangers, and people of low condition, a

prince is not to contend, for they are beneath him: he may spare some

out of good will, and others as he would do some little creatures that

a man cannot touch without fouling his fingers: but for those that

are to be pardoned or exposed to public punishment, he may use mercy

as he sees occasion; and a generous mind can never want inducements

and motives to it; and whether it be _age_ or _sex_, _high_ or _low_,

nothing comes amiss.

To pass now to the vindication of others, there must be had a regard

either to the amendment of the person punished, or the making others

better for fear of punishment, or the taking the offender out of the

way for the security of others. An amendment may be procured by a

small punishment, for he lives more carefully that has something yet

to lose—it is a kind of _impunity_ to be incapable of a _farther

punishment_. The corruptions of a city are best cured by a few and

sparing severities; for the multitude of offenders creates a custom of

offending, and company authorizes a crime, and there is more good to

be done upon a _dissolute age_ by _patience_ than by _rigor_; provided

that it pass not for an _approbation_ of _ill-manners_, but only as an

_unwillingness_ to proceed to _extremities_. Under a merciful prince, a

man will be ashamed to offend, because a punishment that is inflicted

by a gentle governor seems to fall heavier and with more reproach:

and it is remarkable also, that “those sins are often committed which

are very often punished.” Caligula, in five years, condemned more

people to the _sack_ than ever were before him: and there were “fewer

parricides before the law against them than after;” for our ancestors

did wisely presume that the crime would never be committed, until by

law for punishing it, they found that it might be done. _Parricides_

began with the _law_ against them, and the punishment instructed men in

the crime. Where there are few punishments, innocency is indulged as a

public good, and it is a dangerous thing to show a city how strong it

is in delinquents. There is a certain contumacy in the nature of man

that makes him oppose difficulties. We are better to follow than to

drive; as a generous horse rides best with an easy bit. People _obey

willingly_ where they are _commanded kindly_.

When Burrhus the prefect was to sentence two malefactors, he brought

the warrant to Nero to sign; who, after a long reluctancy came to it at

last with this exclamation: “I would I could not write!” A speech that

deserved the whole world for an auditory, but all princes especially;

and that the hearts of all the subjects would conform to the likeness

of their masters. As the head is well or ill, so is the mind dull or

merry. What is the difference betwixt a _king_ and a _tyrant_, but a

_diversity_ of _will_ under one and the _same power_. The one destroys

for his pleasure, the other upon necessity; a distinction rather in

fact than in name.

A gracious prince is armed as well as a tyrant; but it is for the

defence of his people and not for the ruin of them. No king can ever

have faithful servants that accustoms them to tortures and executions;

the very guilty themselves do not lead so anxious a life as the

persecutors: for they are not only afraid of justice, both divine and

human, but it is dangerous for them to mend their manners; so that

when they are once in, they must continue to be wicked upon necessity.

An universal hatred unites in a popular rage. A temperate fear may

be kept in order; but when it comes once to be continual and sharp,

it provokes people to extremities, and transports them to desperate

resolutions, as wild beasts when they are pressed upon the _toil_,

turn back and assault the very pursuers. A turbulent government is a

perpetual trouble both to prince and people; and he that is a terror

to all others is not without terror also himself. Frequent punishments

and revenges may suppress the hatred of a few, but then it stirs up the

detestation of all, so that there is no destroying one enemy without

making many. It is good to master the _will_ of being _cruel_, even

while there may be cause for it, and matter to work upon.

Augustus was a gracious prince when he had the power in his own hand;

but in the _triumviracy_ he made use of his sword, and had his friends

ready armed to set upon Antony during that dispute. But he behaved

himself afterwards at another rate; for when he was betwixt forty and

fifty years of age he was told that Cinna was in a plot to murder him,

with the time, place and manner of the design; and this from one of

the confederates. Upon this he resolved upon a revenge, and sent for

several of his friends to advise upon it. The thought of it kept him

waking, to consider, that there was the life of a young nobleman in the

case, the nephew of Pompey, and a person otherwise innocent. He was

off and on several times whether he should put him to death or not.

“What!” says he, “shall I live in trouble and in danger myself, and the

contriver of my death walk free and secure? Will nothing serve him but

that life which Providence has preserved in so many civil wars—in so

many battles both by sea and land; and now in the state of an universal

peace too—and not a simple murder either, but a sacrifice; for I am

to be assaulted at the very altar—and shall the contriver of all this

villainy escape unpunished?” Here Augustus made a little pause, and

then recollecting himself: “No, no, Cæsar,” says he, “it is rather

Cæsar than Cinna that I am to be angry with: why do I myself live any

longer after that my death is become the interest of so many people?

And if I go on, what end will there be of blood and of punishment?

If it be against my life that the nobility arm itself, and level its

weapons, my single life is not worth the while, if so many must be

destroyed that I may be preserved.”

His wife Livia gave him here an interruption, and desired him that

he would for once hear a woman’s counsel. “Do,” says she, “like a

physician, that when common remedies fail, will try the contrary: you

have got nothing hitherto by severity—after Salvidianus there followed

Lepidus—after him Muræna—Cæpio followed him, and Egnatius followed

Cæpio—try now what mercy will do—forgive Cinna. He is discovered,

and can do no hurt to your person; and it will yet advantage you in

your reputation.” Augustus was glad of the advice, and he gave thanks

for it; and thereupon countermanded the meeting of his friends, and

ordered Cinna to be brought to him alone; for whom he caused a chair

to be set, and then discharged the rest of the company. “Cinna,” says

Augustus, “_before I go any farther_, you must promise not to give me

the interruption of one syllable until I have told you all I have to

say, and you shall have liberty afterwards to say what you please. You

cannot forget, that when I found you in arms against me, and not only

made my _enemy_, but _born_ so, I gave you your life and fortune. Upon

your petition for the priesthood, I granted it, with a repulse to the

sons of those that had been my fellow-soldiers; and you are at this

day so happy and so rich, that even the conquerors envy him that is

overcome; and yet after all this, you are in a plot, Cinna, to murder

me.” At that word Cinna started, and interposed with exclamations,

“that certainly he was far from being either so wicked or so mad.”

“This is a breach of conditions, Cinna,” says Augustus, “it is not your

time to speak yet: I tell you again, that you are in a plot to murder

me;” and so he told him the time, the place, the confederates, the

order and manner of the design, and who it was that was to do the deed.

Cinna, upon this, fixed his eye upon the ground without any reply:

not for his word’s sake, but as in a confusion of conscience: and so

Augustus went on. “What,” says he, “may your design be in all this? Is

it that you would pretend to step into my place? The commonwealth were

in an ill condition, if only Augustus were in the way betwixt you and

the government. You were cast the other day in a cause by one of your

own _freemen_, and do you expect to find a weaker adversary of Cæsar?

But what if I were removed? There is Æmilius Paulus, Fabius Maximus,

and twenty other families of great blood and interest, that would never

bear it.” To cut off the story short; (for it was a discourse of above

two hours; and Augustus lengthened the punishment in _words_, since he

intended that should be all;) “Well, Cinna,” says he, “the life that

I gave to you once as an enemy, I will now repeat it to a _traitor_

and to a _parricide_, and this shall be the last reproach I will give

you. For the time to come there shall be no other contention betwixt

you and me, than which shall outdo the other in point of friendship.”

After this Augustus made Cinna _consul_, (an honor which he confessed

he durst not so much as desire) and Cinna was ever affectionately

faithful to him: he made Cæsar his _sole heir_; and this was the _last

conspiracy_ that ever was formed against him.

This moderation of Augustus was the excellency of his mature age; for

in his youth he was passionate and sudden; and he did many things which

afterward he looked back upon with trouble: after the battle of Actium,

so many navies broken in Sicily, both _Roman_ and _strangers_: the

_Perusian altars_, where 300 _lives_ were _sacrificed_ to the _ghost_

of Julius; his frequent _proscriptions_, and other severities; his

_temperance_ at last seemed to be little more than a _weary cruelty_.

If he had not _forgiven_ those that he _conquered_, whom should

he have _governed_? He chose his very _life-guard_ from among his

_enemies_, and the _flower_ of the Romans owed their _lives_ to his

_clemency_. Nay, he only punished Lepidus himself with _banishment_,

and permitted him to wear the _ensigns_ of his _dignity_, without

taking the _pontificate_ to himself so long as Lepidus was living;

for he would not possess it as a _spoil_, but as an _honor_. This

_clemency_ it was that secured him in his greatness, and ingratiated

him to the people, though he laid his hand upon the government before

they had thoroughly submitted to the yoke; and this clemency it was

that made his _name famous_ to _posterity_. This is it that makes us

reckon him _divine_ without the authority of an _apotheosis_. He was

so tender and patient, that though many a bitter jest was broken upon

him, (and _contumelies_ upon princes are the most _intolerable_ of all

_injuries_) yet he never punished any man upon that subject. _It is_,

then, generous _to be_ merciful, _when we have it in our_ power to

_take_ revenge.

A son of Titus Arius, being examined and found guilty of _parricide_,

was banished Rome, and confined to Marseilles, where his father allowed

him the same annuity that he had before; which made all people conclude

him guilty, when they saw that his father had yet _condemned_ the son

that he could not _hate_. Augustus was pleased to sit upon the fact in

the house of Arius, only as a _single member_ of the _council_ that was

to examine it: if it had been in Cæsar’s palace, the judgment must have

been Cæsar’s and not the _father’s_. Upon a full hearing of the matter,

Cæsar directed that every man should write his opinion whether _guilty_

or _not_, and without declaring of his own, for fear of a partial

vote. Before the opening of the books, Cæsar passed an oath, that he

would not be Arius’s _heir_: and to show that he had no interest in

his sentence, as appeared afterward; for he was not condemned to the

ordinary _punishments_ of _parricides_, nor to a prison, but, by the

mediation of Cæsar, only banished Rome, and confined to the place which

his father should name; Augustus insisting upon it, that the father

should content himself with an easy punishment: and arguing that the

young man was not moved to the attempt by _malice_, and that he was

but half resolved upon the fact, for he wavered in it; and, therefore,

to remove him from the city, and from his father’s sight, would be

sufficient. This is a glorious mercy, and worthy of a prince, to make

all things gentler wherever he comes.

How miserable is that man in himself, who, when he has employed his

power in rapines and cruelty upon others, is yet more unhappy in

himself! He stands in fear both of his domestics and of strangers; the

faith of his friends and the piety of his children, and flies to actual

violence to secure him from the violence he fears. When he comes to

look about him, and to consider what he _has_ done, what he _must_,

and what he is _about_ to do; what with the _wickedness_, and with the

_torments_ of his _conscience_, many times he fears death, oftener he

wishes for it; and lives more odious to himself than to his subjects;

whereas on the contrary, he that takes a care of the public, though of

one part more perhaps than of another, yet there is not any part of it

but he looks upon as part of himself. His mind is tender and gentle;

and even where punishment is necessary and profitable, he comes to it

unwillingly, and without any rancor or enmity in his heart. Let the

authority, in fine, be what it will, clemency becomes it; and the

greater the power, the greater is the glory of it. “It is a truly royal

virtue for a prince to deliver his people _from other_ men’s anger, and

not to oppress them _with his_ own.”

* * * * *

Transcriber's note:

Obvious typographical errors have been corrected silently. Other

variations in hyphenation, spelling and punctuation remain unchanged.

Seneca's Morals of a Happy Life, Benefits, Anger and Clemency · 第 26 / 26 章