CHAPTER XXXVIII.

THE AMERICAN-JEWISH COMMITTEE.

EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND FEDERATIONS.

Formation of the American Jewish Committee――Its first fifteen

members and its membership in 1911――The experimental Kehillah

organizations――The re-organized Jewish Theological Seminary――

Faculty of the Hebrew Union College――The Dropsie College of

Hebrew and Cognate Learning――The Rabbi Joseph Jacob School――

Other Orthodox “Yeshibot”――Talmud Torahs and “Chedarim”――Hebrew

Institutes――They become more Jewish because other agencies now

do the work of Americanizing the immigrant――Technical Schools――

Young Men’s and Young Women’s Hebrew Associations――Federations

of various kinds.

The massacres of 1905 aroused and united the Jews of the civilized

world, and the necessity of an organization to cope with the situation

and with similar situations in the future began to be generally

felt. The time when the Alliance Israelite Universelle, with its

preponderance of French Jews and French methods, could act for the

Jewry of all countries was now past, and only a new organization in

which each country was independently represented could answer the

purpose. The same was also true, in a more restricted sense, in the

United States itself. None of the national Jewish bodies, not even the

Order B’nai B’rith, with its Board of Delegates, could now assume to

speak with undisputed authority in the name of American Jewry as it

is now constituted. An attempt to form a representative international

Committee of Jews was made at the General Jewish Conference which was

convened at Brussels, Belgium, in the last days of January, 1906, where

a resolution to that effect was adopted. But the plan was not carried

out.

Illustration: Judge Mayer Sulzberger.

Photo by Gutekunst, Phila.

Within a week after the Brussels Conference (February 3–4), a

conference was held in New York City “to consider the formation of a

General Jewish Committee or other representative body of the Jews in

the United States.”[57] A committee which was appointed by the chairman,

Judge Mayer Sulzberger of Philadelphia, submitted its report to the

conference at a subsequent meeting (May 19), which was referred to a

Committee of Five, with instructions to select another Committee of

Fifteen, representative of all Jewish societies of the United States,

to be increased to fifty members, if considered desirable. About

a month later, the chairman announced the following Committee as

the nucleus of the American Jewish Committee, which was ultimately

increased to sixty: Cyrus Adler, Washington, D. C.; Nathan Bijur,

New York; Joseph H. Cohen, New York; Emil G. Hirsch, Chicago, Ill.;

D. H. Lieberman, New York; Julian W. Mack, Chicago, Ill.; J. L. Magnes,

New York; Louis Marshall, New York; Isidor Newman, New Orleans, La.;

Simon W. Rosendale, Albany, N. Y.; Max Senior, Cincinnati, O.; Jacob H.

Schiff, New York; Oscar S. Straus, New York; M. C. Sloss, San Francisco,

Cal., and Simon Wolf, Washington, D. C.

The American-Jewish Committee was organized with sixty members, and

adopted a constitution (November 11, 1906), which begins: “The purpose

of this committee is to prevent infringement of the civil and religious

rights of the Jews, and to alleviate the consequences of persecution.

In the event of a threatened or actual denial or invasion of such

rights, or when conditions calling for relief from calamities affecting

Jews exist anywhere, correspondence may be entered into with those

familiar with the situation, and if the persons on the spot feel

themselves able to cope with the situation, no action need be taken;

if, on the other hand, they request aid, steps shall be taken to

furnish it.” The Committee was later again increased on account of

the enlargement of the representation from New York City, owing to

the organization of the “Kehillah,” and last year consisted of the

following, representing the thirteen districts into which the country

was divided for that purpose:

Dist. I: Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, 2 members:

Ceasar Cone, Greensboro, N. C.; Montague Triest, Charleston, S. C.

Dist. II: Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, 2 members: Jacques Loeb,

Montgomery, Ala.; Nathan Cohn, Nashville, Tenn.

Dist. III: Arizona, Louisiana, New Mexico, Texas, 2 members: Maurice

Stern, New Orleans, La.; Isaac H. Kempner, Galveston, Tex.

Dist. IV: Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, 3 members: Morris M.

Cohen, Little Rock, Ark.; David S. Lehman, Denver, Col.; Elias Michael,

St. Louis, Mo.

Dist. V: California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, 3 members:

Max C. Sloss, San Francisco, Cal.; Harris Weinstock, Sacramento, Cal.;

Ben. Selling, Portland, Ore.

Illustration: Hon. Benjamin Selling.

Photo by Trover-Weigel, Salem, Oregon.

Dist. VI: Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota,

South Dakota, Wisconsin, Wyoming, 4 members: Henry M. Butzel, Detroit,

Mich.; Emanuel Cohen, Minneapolis, Minn.; Victor Rosewater, Omaha, Neb.;

Max Landauer, Milwaukee, Wis.

Dist. VII: Illinois, 7 members: Edwin G. Foreman, M. E. Greenebaum,

B. Horwich, Julian W. Mack, Julius Rosenwald, Joseph Stolz, all of

Chicago, Ill.; Samuel Woolner (deceased), Peoria, Ill.

Dist. VIII: Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, West Virginia, 5 members: Louis

Newberger, Indianapolis, Ind.; Isaac W. Bernheim, Louisville, Ky.;

David Philipson, Cincinnati, O.; J. Walter Freiberg, Cincinnati, O.;

E. M. Baker, Cleveland, O.

Dist. IX: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, 9 members: Cyrus Adler,

Philadelphia, Pa.; Isaac W. Frank, Pittsburg, Pa.; Wm. B. Hackenburg,

B. L. Levinthal, M. Rosenbaum, all of Philadelphia, Pa.; Isadore Sobel,

Erie, Pa.; Mayer Sulzberger, Philadelphia, Pa.; A. Leo Weil, Pittsburg,

Pa.; Benjamin Wolf, Philadelphia, Pa.

Dist. X: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, 2 members:

Harry Friedenwald, Baltimore, Md.; Jacob H. Hollander, Baltimore, Md.

Dist. XI: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode

Island, Vermont, 3 members: Isaac M. Ullman, New Haven, Conn.; Lee M.

Friedman, Boston, Mass.; Harry Cutler, Providence, R. I.

Dist. XII: New York: Joseph Barondess, Samuel Dorf, Bernard Drachman,

Harry Fischel, William Fishman, Israel Friedlaender, Samuel B.

Hamburger, Maurice H. Harris, Samuel I. Hyman, S. Jarmulowsky, Leon

Kamaiky, Philip Klein, Nathan Lamport, Adolph Lewisohn, J. L. Magnes,

M. Z. Margolies, Louis Marshall, H. Pereire Mendes, Solomon Neumann,

Jacob H. Schiff, Bernard Semel, P. A. Siegelstein, Joseph Silverman,

Cyrus L. Sulzberger, Felix M. Warburg: 25 members.

Dist. XIII: New York (exclusive of the city), 2 members: Abram J. Katz,

Rochester; Simon W. Rosendale, Albany.

Members-at-large: Nathan Bijur, New York City; Isidor Straus, New York

City.

The officers are: Mayer Sulzberger, President; Julian W. Mack and Jacob

H. Hollander, Vice-Presidents; Isaac W. Bernheim, Treasurer; Herbert

Friedenwald, Secretary. The Executive Committee consists of Cyrus

Adler, Harry Cutler, Samuel Dorf, J. L. Magnes, Louis Marshall, Julius

Rosenwald, Jacob H. Schiff, Isadore Sobel, Cyrus L. Sulzberger and

A. Leo Weil.

The strength of the committee consists mainly in its personnel, as

it comprises the most influential as well as the most active Jewish

communal leaders of the country. The membership from the large centers

of population, like New York, Philadelphia and Chicago, includes also

representatives of the immigrants of the last period, and the plan

of the Jewish Alliance of twenty years ago[58] to bring together the

older and the younger portions of the community is, to some extent,

consummated in this Committee. It has made some valuable efforts

on behalf of the suffering Jews in other countries, and also in the

interest of a speedy solution of the vexed Russian passport question,

and it is becoming recognized as the representative Jewish body in the

United States.

When the Jewish community or “Kehillah” was formed in New York in

1909, consisting of the representatives of congregations, fraternal

and educational organizations, the plans of those who wanted to have

the American Jewish Committee re-organized on a more democratic basis,

and to make it the elected and authorized representative of the Jewish

masses, was partially carried out. The twenty-five members of the

Executive Committee of the New York “Kehillah” are the New York members

of the American-Jewish Committee. The Jews of Philadelphia have now

also formed a “Kehillah” on the same basis of representation. But

these new forms of amalgamating the large communities and forming

authoritative Jewish central bodies is yet in the experimental stage,

and several years, perhaps several decades, will have to pass before

their permanent existence will be assured and justified. The great

difference between the Committee and the “Kehillahs” is, that in the

first men of power and authority who worked effectively for Jewish

interests before, individually or as leaders of communal bodies, have

united to work together in the same direction. The “Kehillahs” on the

other hand, have yet to create the forces which are to sustain them

and make them formidable. Their chief value consists of their being

symptoms of the times, indicating the approach of the end of the period

of chaos in general Jewish affairs, and an inclination to submit to

representative authority in communal matters. The most conspicuous act

of the New York “Kehillah” was its foundation of a Bureau of Education

under the direction of the well-known Jewish educator, Dr. Samson

Benderly (b. in Safed, Palestine, 1876), who conducted Jewish schools

in Baltimore with marked success and is now working out his original

plans in educating Jewish teachers who should be capable of suitably

performing their duties to the coming generation. But the soundness

and the practicability of his plans are as problematical as that of

the “Kehillah” itself.

Illustration: Prof. Solomon Schechter.

Much other valuable work was done in the cause of Jewish education

in the last ten years. The Jewish Theological Seminary, which was

reorganized in 1902, when the presidency was assumed by the famous

Roumanian Jewish scholar, Solomon Schechter, now has on its faculty

as professors: President and Professor of Jewish Theology, Solomon

Schechter; Biblical Literature and Exegesis, Israel Friedlaender;

Talmud, Louis Ginzberg; History, Alexander Marx; Homiletics, Mordecai

M. Kaplan; Instructor in the Talmud, Joshua A. Joffe; Instructor in

Hebrew and Rabbinics, Israel Davidson; English Literature and Rhetoric,

Joseph Jacobs. There is also now a Teachers’ Institute connected with

the Seminary, of which Prof. Mordecai M. Kaplan is the principal.

The Hebrew Union College of Cincinnati, which is maintained by the

Union of American Hebrew Congregations, has also been considerably

strengthened in the last few years. Its faculty consists of the

following professors: Homiletics, Theology and Hellenistic Literature

(President), Kaufman Kohler; Jewish History and Literature, Gotthard

Deutsch; Ethics and Pedagogy, Louis Grossman; Jewish Philosophy, David

Neumark; Biblical Exegesis (Associate), Moses Buttenwieser; Biblical

Literature, Henry Englander; Instructor in Bible and Semitic Languages,

Julian Morgenstern.

The youngest of the Jewish higher institutions of learning in the

United States is The Dropsie College of Hebrew and Cognate Learning of

Philadelphia, which was incorporated in 1907. Moses Aaron Dropsie (b.

in Philadelphia, 1821; d. there 1905), an attorney and street railway

owner of Dutch descent, bequeathed the bulk of his fortune, amounting

to nearly one million dollars, to the foundation of that college, which

was opened in 1909. The faculty consists of: President, Cyrus Adler;

Max L. Margolis, in charge of the Biblical Department; Henry Malter,

in charge of the Rabbinical Department; Jacob Hoschander, Instructor

Department of Cognate Languages; Hon. Mayer Sulzberger, Resident

Lecturer in Jewish Jurisprudence and Institutes of Government.

An institution of an entirely different kind is the Rabbi Joseph Jacob

School, or Yeshibah, of New York, which was organized in 1901, whose

founder, Samuel S. Andron, still retains the presidency. It is the

only considerable Jewish school on the denominational or parochial

plan, where English and general studies according to the curriculum

of the public schools are pursued together with the study of the

Hebrew language, Bible, Talmud and Rabbinical literature. It is the

first attempt to combine a strictly Orthodox and a thorough American

education, and, if possible, to educate American rabbis who should

be acceptable to the old style pious immigrant as well as to the

generation which is growing up here. There are other Yeshibot in all

of the large cities in the United States, but most of them simply

follow their prototype, the Talmudical Academy of the Slavic countries,

where there is no other official subject of study except the Talmud and

Rabbinical literature, and secular studies are pursued clandestinely

or not at all. In some of the Yeshibot here, like in the Rabbi Isaac

Elchanan Theological Seminary of New York, some concessions were made

to secular studies, but there was no attempt, and perhaps no desire,

to harmonize the systems and to supply a good American education.

The original forms of the elementary Jewish school, the private

“Cheder” and the public or semi-public Talmud Torah, is represented

among the Jews of the Slavic countries in all its varieties, from

the old-fashioned Russian school, where the Hebrew text is translated

in a traditional Yiddish, which the pupil who is born or brought up

here understands but imperfectly, to the Americanized place, where

the translations are made in the English, and the modernized Russian

school, in which Hebrew is used in interpreting the Scripture and the

text books prepared for the purpose. Naturally the oldest and largest

Talmud Torah of New York, the “Machzike Talmud Torah” of East Broadway

(organized 1882), of which Moses H. Phillips is president and I. A.

Kaplan superintendent, is looked upon as a model institution of its

kind. There are nearly two score Talmud Torahs in New York City, some

of them attached to synagogues, but most of them separate institutions

with buildings of their own, several of which, like the Up-Town

Talmud Torah and the one in Brownsville (Brooklyn), are magnificent

establishments, with incomes which prove the material well-being of

the immigrant classes, as well as their willingness to pay for Jewish

education.

There are large Talmud Torahs in every city where there is a

considerable Jewish population, and, as in many other respects, New

York conditions are duplicated in Chicago, Philadelphia and other great

centers. In the smaller towns a Talmud Torah is now established soon

after the foundation of a synagogue, and the private teacher, who is

often also the Shochet and Chazzan or Mohel, usually antedates them

both. There is one important difference, however, between the Talmud

Torah of the Old World, especially Russia, and the same institutions

here. There the Talmud Torah is mainly for the children of the very

poor, for destitute orphans, foundlings and the like. Here the scarcity

of good private teachers, the high compensation which they require,

and the limited time which could be given to Jewish studies, makes

the organized school preferable also for the children of parents who

are willing and able to pay for tuition. Some Talmud Torahs which are

maintained by single synagogues for their members, especially in small

communities, partake of the nature, and even of the exclusiveness, of

the Sabbath School which is an adjunct to almost every well conducted

Reform Temple. _Volks-Schulen_, or Hebrew schools for girls, have

lately been established in several sections of New York, and also in

other cities.

There are also in every large community and in some sections of large

cities educational institutions whose chief object is to facilitate

the Americanization of the immigrants. The model institution of that

sort is the Educational Alliance (formerly the Hebrew Institute) of

New York. Some of them bear the name Educational Society, and a large

number, among which the Chicago institution, of which Julius Rosenwald

(b. in Springfield, Ill., 1862) is the chief patron, prefer the

old name of Hebrew Institute. This class of institutions have been

undergoing material changes for the last ten or fifteen years, and

those founded lately are entirely unlike those which belonged to

the earlier period. All fear that the newcomers will not become

Americanized sufficiently fast has now disappeared; and, besides, the

work of Americanization which was formerly done by private charity,

like the maintenance of evening classes and even of day classes for

adult immigrants, to instruct them in English and elementary knowledge,

is now done by the cities themselves. Private efforts are now made more

in the direction of Jewish education and religious or semi-religious

activities, and some of the Hebrew Institutes, notably the youngest and

those established and maintained by immigrants themselves, are almost

Talmud Torahs, often combined with synagogues, in which the religious

element predominates, and in some of them rabbis occupy the leading

positions.

Lastly, there is a class of splendid educational establishments,

founded and endowed by Jewish philanthropists, for the technical

development of the young Jewish immigrants. The most important of

these in New York are the Baron de Hirsch Trade School, the Hebrew

Technical Institute (organized 1883), and the Hebrew Technical School

for Girls. Chicago has the Jewish (formerly the Manual) Training School

(incorporated 1887); Baltimore its Maccabean House (incorporated 1900);

Boston its Hebrew Industrial School (organized 1889), and the Jewish

Educational Alliance of St. Louis, Mo., has a large industrial school;

Cincinnati has a Boys’ Industrial School; while Philadelphia has the

B’nai B’rith Manual Training School and the Industrial Home for Jewish

Girls. The Young Men’s Hebrew Associations, the Young Women’s Hebrew

Associations and other Jewish organizations of a like character in

numerous places, maintain various classes――religious, technical,

etc.――offering educational opportunities to new arrivals and to young

working people who ♦cannot utilize the regular institutions of public

education.

The efforts to organize and to federate, which resulted in the

formation of the American-Jewish Committee, produced several other

communal federations of variegated character. The oldest and most

substantial of these is the Federation of Galician and Bukowinian

Jews in America (organized 1904), which founded and maintains the Har

Moriah Hospital in New York. There have also lately been organized

a Federation of Roumanian Jews and one of Russian-Polish Jews. There

is also in New York a Federation of Contributors to Jewish Communal

Institutions and a Federation of Jewish Organizations, both of which

were organized in 1906.

History of the Jews in America From the Period of the Discovery of the New World to the Present Time · 第 4 / 10 章