Gitánas; they wear not the large red cloaks and immense bonnets of coarse
beaver which distinguish their sisters of England; they have no other
headgear than a handkerchief, which is occasionally resorted to as a
defence against the severity of the weather; their hair is sometimes
confined by a comb, but more frequently is permitted to stray dishevelled
down their shoulders; they are fond of large ear-rings, whether of gold,
silver, or metal, resembling in this respect the poissardes of France.
There is little to distinguish them from the Spanish women save the
absence of the mantilla, which they never carry. Females of fashion not
unfrequently take pleasure in dressing à la Gitána, as it is called; but
this female Gypsy fashion, like that of the men, is more properly the
fashion of Andalusia, the principal characteristic of which is the saya,
which is exceedingly short, with many rows of flounces.
True it is that the original dress of the Gitános, male and female,
whatever it was, may have had some share in forming the Andalusian
fashion, owing to the great number of these wanderers who found their way
to that province at an early period. The Andalusians are a mixed breed
of various nations, Romans, Vandals, Moors; perhaps there is a slight
sprinkling of Gypsy blood in their veins, and of Gypsy fashion in their
garb.
The Gitános are, for the most part, of the middle size, and the
proportions of their frames convey a powerful idea of strength and
activity united; a deformed or weakly object is rarely found amongst them
in persons of either sex; such probably perish in their infancy, unable
to support the hardships and privations to which the race is still
subjected from its great poverty, and these same privations have given
and still give a coarseness and harshness to their features, which are
all strongly marked and expressive. Their complexion is by no means
uniform, save that it is invariably darker than the general olive hue of
the Spaniards; not unfrequently countenances as dark as those of mulattos
present themselves, and in some few instances of almost negro blackness.
Like most people of savage ancestry, their teeth are white and strong;
their mouths are not badly formed, but it is in the eye more than in any
other feature that they differ from other human beings.
There is something remarkable in the eye of the Gitáno: should his hair
and complexion become fair as those of the Swede or the Finn, and his
jockey gait as grave and ceremonious as that of the native of Old
Castile, were he dressed like a king, a priest, or a warrior, still would
the Gitáno be detected by his eye, should it continue unchanged. The Jew
is known by his eye, but then in the Jew that feature is peculiarly
small; the Chinese has a remarkable eye, but then the eye of the Chinese
is oblong, and even with the face, which is flat; but the eye of the
Gitáno is neither large nor small, and exhibits no marked difference in
its shape from the eyes of the common cast. Its peculiarity consists
chiefly in a strange staring expression, which to be understood must be
seen, and in a thin glaze, which steals over it when in repose, and seems
to emit phosphoric light. That the Gypsy eye has sometimes a peculiar
effect, we learn from the following stanza:—
‘A Gypsy stripling’s glossy eye
Has pierced my bosom’s core,
A feat no eye beneath the sky
Could e’er effect before.’
The following passages are extracted from a Spanish work, {247} and
cannot be out of place here, as they relate to those matters to which we
have devoted this chapter.
‘The Gitános have an olive complexion and very marked physiognomy; their
cheeks are prominent, their lips thick, their eyes vivid and black; their
hair is long, black, and coarse, and their teeth very white. The general
expression of their physiognomy is a compound of pride, slavishness, and
cunning. They are, for the most part, of good stature, well formed, and
support with facility fatigue and every kind of hardship. When they
discuss any matter, or speak among themselves, whether in Catalan, in
Castilian, or in Germania, which is their own peculiar jargon, they
always make use of much gesticulation, which contributes to give to their
conversation and to the vivacity of their physiognomy a certain
expression, still more penetrating and characteristic.
‘When a Gitáno has occasion to speak of some business in which his
interest is involved, he redoubles his gestures in proportion as he knows
the necessity of convincing those who hear him, and fears their
impassibility. If any rancorous idea agitate him in the course of his
narrative; if he endeavour to infuse into his auditors sentiments of
jealousy, vengeance, or any violent passion, his features become
exaggerated, and the vivacity of his glances, and the contraction of his
lips, show clearly, and in an imposing manner, the foreign origin of the
Gitános, and all the customs of barbarous people. Even his very smile
has an expression hard and disagreeable. One might almost say that joy
in him is a forced sentiment, and that, like unto the savage man, sadness
is the dominant feature of his physiognomy.
‘The Gitána is distinguished by the same complexion, and almost the same
features. In her frame she is as well formed, and as flexible as the
Gitáno. Condemned to suffer the same privations and wants, her
countenance, when her interest does not oblige her to dissemble her
feelings, presents the same aspect of melancholy, and shows besides, with
more energy, the rancorous passions of which the female heart is
susceptible. Free in her actions, her carriage, and her pursuits, she
speaks, vociferates, and makes more gestures than the Gitáno, and, in
imitation of him, her arms are in continual motion, to give more
expression to the imagery with which she accompanies her discourse; her
whole body contributes to her gesture, and to increase its force;
endeavouring by these means to sharpen the effect of language in itself
insufficient; and her vivid and disordered imagination is displayed in
her appearance and attitude.
‘When she turns her hand to any species of labour, her hurried action,
the disorder of her hair, which is scarcely subjected by a little comb,
and her propensity to irritation, show how little she loves toil, and her
disgust for any continued occupation.
‘In her disputes, the air of menace and high passion, the flow of words,
and the facility with which she provokes and despises danger, indicate
manners half barbarous, and ignorance of other means of defence.
Finally, both in males and females, their physical constitution, colour,
agility, and flexibility, reveal to us a caste sprung from a burning
clime, and devoted to all those exercises which contribute to evolve
bodily vigour, and certain mental faculties.
‘The dress of the Gitáno varies with the country which he inhabits. Both
in Rousillon and Catalonia his habiliments generally consist of jacket,
waistcoat, pantaloons, and a red faja, which covers part of his
waistcoat; on his feet he wears hempen sandals, with much ribbon tied
round the leg as high as the calf; he has, moreover, either woollen or
cotton stockings; round his neck he wears a handkerchief, carelessly
tied; and in the winter he uses a blanket or mantle, with sleeves, cast
over the shoulder; his head is covered with the indispensable red cap,
which appears to be the favourite ornament of many nations in the
vicinity of the Mediterranean and Caspian Sea.
‘The neck and the elbows of the jacket are adorned with pieces of blue
and yellow cloth embroidered with silk, as well as the seams of the
pantaloons; he wears, moreover, on the jacket or the waistcoat, various
rows of silver buttons, small and round, sustained by rings or chains of
the same metal. The old people, and those who by fortune, or some other
cause, exercise, in appearance, a kind of authority over the rest, are
almost always dressed in black or dark-blue velvet. Some of those who
affect elegance amongst them keep for holidays a complete dress of
sky-blue velvet, with embroidery at the neck, pocket-holes, arm-pits, and
in all the seams; in a word, with the exception of the turban, this was
the fashion of dress of the ancient Moors of Granada, the only difference
being occasioned by time and misery.
‘The dress of the Gitánas is very varied: the young girls, or those who
are in tolerably easy circumstances, generally wear a black bodice laced
up with a string, and adjusted to their figures, and contrasting with the
scarlet-coloured saya, which only covers a part of the leg; their shoes
are cut very low, and are adorned with little buckles of silver; the
breast, and the upper part of the bodice, are covered either with a white
handkerchief, or one of some vivid colour; and on the head is worn
another handkerchief, tied beneath the chin, one of the ends of which
falls on the shoulder, in the manner of a hood. When the cold or the
heat permit, the Gitána removes the hood, without untying the knots, and
exhibits her long and shining tresses restrained by a comb. The old
women, and the very poor, dress in the same manner, save that their
habiliments are more coarse and the colours less in harmony. Amongst
them misery appears beneath the most revolting aspect; whilst the poorest
Gitáno preserves a certain deportment which would make his aspect
supportable, if his unquiet and ferocious glance did not inspire us with
aversion.’
CHAPTER VI
WHILST their husbands are engaged in their jockey vocation, or in
wielding the cachas, the Callees, or Gypsy females, are seldom idle, but
are endeavouring, by various means, to make all the gain they can. The
richest amongst them are generally contrabandistas, and in the large
towns go from house to house with prohibited goods, especially silk and
cotton, and occasionally with tobacco. They likewise purchase cast-off
female wearing-apparel, which, when vamped up and embellished, they
sometimes contrive to sell as new, with no inconsiderable profit.
Gitánas of this description are of the most respectable class; the rest,
provided they do not sell roasted chestnuts, or esteras, which are a
species of mat, seek a livelihood by different tricks and practices, more
or less fraudulent; for example—
_La Bahi_, or fortune-telling, which is called in Spanish, _buena
ventura_.—This way of extracting money from the credulity of dupes is, of
all those practised by the Gypsies, the readiest and most easy; promises
are the only capital requisite, and the whole art of fortune-telling
consists in properly adapting these promises to the age and condition of
the parties who seek for information. The Gitánas are clever enough in
the accomplishment of this, and in most cases afford perfect
satisfaction. Their practice chiefly lies amongst females, the portion
of the human race most given to curiosity and credulity. To the young
maidens they promise lovers, handsome invariably, and sometimes rich; to
wives children, and perhaps another husband; for their eyes are so
penetrating, that occasionally they will develop your most secret
thoughts and wishes; to the old, riches—and nothing but riches; for they
have sufficient knowledge of the human heart to be aware that avarice is
the last passion that becomes extinct within it. These riches are to
proceed either from the discovery of hidden treasures or from across the
water; from the Americas, to which the Spaniards still look with hope, as
there is no individual in Spain, however poor, but has some connection in
those realms of silver and gold, at whose death he considers it probable
that he may succeed to a brilliant ‘heréncia.’ The Gitánas, in the
exercise of this practice, find dupes almost as readily amongst the
superior classes, as the veriest dregs of the population. It is their
boast, that the best houses are open to them; and perhaps in the space of
one hour, they will spae the bahi to a duchess, or countess, in one of
the hundred palaces of Madrid, and to half a dozen of the lavanderas
engaged in purifying the linen of the capital, beneath the willows which
droop on the banks of the murmuring Manzanares. One great advantage
which the Gypsies possess over all other people is an utter absence of
_mauvaise honte_; their speech is as fluent, and their eyes as unabashed,
in the presence of royalty, as before those from whom they have nothing
to hope or fear; the result being, that most minds quail before them.
There were two Gitánas at Madrid, one Pepita by name, and the other La
Chicharona; the first was a spare, shrewd, witch-like female, about
fifty, and was the mother-in-law of La Chicharona, who was remarkable for
her stoutness. These women subsisted entirely by fortune-telling and
swindling. It chanced that the son of Pepita, and husband of Chicharona,
having spirited away a horse, was sent to the presidio of Malaga for ten
years of hard labour. This misfortune caused inexpressible affliction to
his wife and mother, who determined to make every effort to procure his
liberation. The readiest way which occurred to them was to procure an
interview with the Queen Regent Christina, who they doubted not would
forthwith pardon the culprit, provided they had an opportunity of
assailing her with their Gypsy discourse; for, to use their own words,
‘they well knew what to say.’ I at that time lived close by the palace,
in the street of Santiago, and daily, for the space of a month, saw them
bending their steps in that direction.
One day they came to me in a great hurry, with a strange expression on
both their countenances. ‘We have seen Christina, hijo’ (my son), said
Pepita to me.
‘Within the palace?’ I inquired.
‘Within the palace, O child of my garlochin,’ answered the sibyl:
‘Christina at last saw and sent for us, as I knew she would; I told her
“bahi,” and Chicharona danced the Romalis (Gypsy dance) before her.’
‘What did you tell her?’
‘I told her many things,’ said the hag, ‘many things which I need not
tell you: know, however, that amongst other things, I told her that the
chabori (little queen) would die, and then she would be Queen of Spain.
I told her, moreover, that within three years she would marry the son of
the King of France, and it was her bahi to die Queen of France and Spain,
and to be loved much, and hated much.’
‘And did you not dread her anger, when you told her these things?’
‘Dread her, the Busnee?’ screamed Pepita: ‘No, my child, she dreaded me
far more; I looked at her so—and raised my finger so—and Chicharona
clapped her hands, and the Busnee believed all I said, and was afraid of
me; and then I asked for the pardon of my son, and she pledged her word
to see into the matter, and when we came away, she gave me this baria of
gold, and to Chicharona this other, so at all events we have hokkanoed
the queen. May an evil end overtake her body, the Busnee!’
Though some of the Gitánas contrive to subsist by fortune-telling alone,
the generality of them merely make use of it as an instrument towards the
accomplishment of greater things. The immediate gains are scanty; a few
cuartos being the utmost which they receive from the majority of their
customers. But the bahi is an excellent passport into houses, and when
they spy a convenient opportunity, they seldom fail to avail themselves
of it. It is necessary to watch them strictly, as articles frequently
disappear in a mysterious manner whilst Gitánas are telling fortunes.
The bahi, moreover, is occasionally the prelude to a device which we
shall now attempt to describe, and which is called _Hokkano Baro_, or the
great trick, of which we have already said something in the former part
of this work. It consists in persuading some credulous person to deposit
whatever money and valuables the party can muster in a particular spot,
under the promise that the deposit will increase many manifold. Some of
our readers will have difficulty in believing that any people can be
found sufficiently credulous to allow themselves to be duped by a trick
of this description, the grossness of the intended fraud seeming too
palpable. Experience, however, proves the contrary. The deception is
frequently practised at the present day, and not only in Spain but in
England—enlightened England—and in France likewise; an instance being
given in the memoirs of Vidocq, the late celebrated head of the secret
police of Paris, though, in that instance, the perpetrator of the fraud
was not a Gypsy. The most subtle method of accomplishing the hokkano
baro is the following:—
When the dupe—a widow we will suppose, for in these cases the dupes are
generally widows—has been induced to consent to make the experiment, the
Gitána demands of her whether she has in the house some strong chest with
a safe lock. On receiving an affirmative answer, she will request to see
all the gold and silver of any description which she may chance to have
in her possession. The treasure is shown her; and when the Gitána has
carefully inspected and counted it, she produces a white handkerchief,
saying, Lady, I give you this handkerchief, which is blessed. Place in
it your gold and silver, and tie it with three knots. I am going for
three days, during which period you must keep the bundle beneath your
pillow, permitting no one to go near it, and observing the greatest
secrecy, otherwise the money will take wings and fly away. Every morning
during the three days it will be well to open the bundle, for your own
satisfaction, to see that no misfortune has befallen your treasure; be
always careful, however, to fasten it again with the three knots. On my
return, we will place the bundle, after having inspected it, in the
chest, which you shall yourself lock, retaining the key in your
possession. But, thenceforward, for three weeks, you must by no means
unlock the chest, nor look at the treasure—if you do it will fly away.
Only follow my directions, and you will gain much, very much, baribu.
The Gitána departs, and, during the three days, prepares a bundle as
similar as possible to the one which contains the money of her dupe, save
that instead of gold ounces, dollars, and plate, its contents consist of
copper money and pewter articles of little or no value. With this bundle
concealed beneath her cloak, she returns at the end of three days to her
intended victim. The bundle of real treasure is produced and inspected,
and again tied up by the Gitána, who then requests the other to open the
chest, which done, she formally places _a bundle_ in it; but, in the
meanwhile, she has contrived to substitute the fictitious for the real
one. The chest is then locked, the lady retaining the key. The Gitána
promises to return at the end of three weeks, to open the chest, assuring
the lady that if it be not unlocked until that period, it will be found
filled with gold and silver; but threatening that in the event of her
injunctions being disregarded, the money deposited will vanish. She then
walks off with great deliberation, bearing away the spoil. It is
needless to say that she never returns.
There are other ways of accomplishing the hokkano baro. The most simple,
and indeed the one most generally used by the Gitánas, is to persuade
some simple individual to hide a sum of money in the earth, which they
afterwards carry away. A case of this description occurred within my own
knowledge, at Madrid, towards the latter part of the year 1837. There
was a notorious Gitána, of the name of Aurora; she was about forty years
of age, a Valencian by birth, and immensely fat. This amiable personage,
by some means, formed the acquaintance of a wealthy widow lady; and was
not slow in attempting to practise the hokkano baro upon her. She
succeeded but too well. The widow, at the instigation of Aurora, buried
one hundred ounces of gold beneath a ruined arch in a field, at a short
distance from the wall of Madrid. The inhumation was effected at night
by the widow alone. Aurora was, however, on the watch, and, in less than
ten minutes after the widow had departed, possessed herself of the
treasure; perhaps the largest one ever acquired by this kind of deceit.
The next day the widow had certain misgivings, and, returning to the
spot, found her money gone. About six months after this event, I was
imprisoned in the Carcel de la Corte, at Madrid, and there I found
Aurora, who was in durance for defrauding the widow. She said that it
had been her intention to depart for Valencia with the ‘barias,’ as she
styled her plunder, but the widow had discovered the trick too soon, and
she had been arrested. She added, however, that she had contrived to
conceal the greatest part of the property, and that she expected her
liberation in a few days, having been prodigal of bribes to the
‘justicia.’ In effect, her liberation took place sooner than my own.
Nevertheless, she had little cause to triumph, as before she left the
prison she had been fleeced of the last cuarto of her ill-gotten gain, by
alguazils and escribanos, who, she admitted, understood hokkano baro much
better than herself.
When I next saw Aurora, she informed me that she was once more on
excellent terms with the widow, whom she had persuaded that the loss of
the money was caused by her own imprudence, in looking for it before the
appointed time; the spirit of the earth having removed it in anger. She
added that her dupe was quite disposed to make another venture, by which
she hoped to retrieve her former loss.
_Ustilar pastésas_.—Under this head may be placed various kinds of theft
committed by the Gitános. The meaning of the words is stealing with the
hands; but they are more generally applied to the filching of money by
dexterity of hand, when giving or receiving change. For example: a
Gitána will enter a shop, and purchase some insignificant article,
tendering in payment a baria or golden ounce. The change being put down
before her on the counter, she counts the money, and complains that she
has received a dollar and several pesetas less than her due. It seems
impossible that there can be any fraud on her part, as she has not even
taken the pieces in her hand, but merely placed her fingers upon them;
pushing them on one side. She now asks the merchant what he means by
attempting to deceive the poor woman. The merchant, supposing that he
has made a mistake, takes up the money, counts it, and finds in effect
that the just sum is not there. He again hands out the change, but there
is now a greater deficiency than before, and the merchant is convinced
that he is dealing with a witch. The Gitána now pushes the money to him,
uplifts her voice, and talks of the justicia. Should the merchant become
frightened, and, emptying a bag of dollars, tell her to pay herself, as
has sometimes been the case, she will have a fine opportunity to exercise
her powers, and whilst taking the change will contrive to convey secretly
into her sleeves five or six dollars at least; after which she will
depart with much vociferation, declaring that she will never again enter
the shop of so cheating a picaro.
Of all the Gitánas at Madrid, Aurora the fat was, by their own
confession, the most dexterous at this species of robbery; she having
been known in many instances, whilst receiving change for an ounce, to
steal the whole value, which amounts to sixteen dollars. It was not
without reason that merchants in ancient times were, according to Martin
Del Rio, advised to sell nothing out of their shops to Gitánas, as they
possessed an infallible secret for attracting to their own purses from
the coffers of the former the money with which they paid for the articles
they purchased. This secret consisted in stealing á pastésas, which they
still practise. Many accounts of witchcraft and sorcery, which are
styled old women’s tales, are perhaps equally well founded. Real actions
have been attributed to wrong causes.
Shoplifting, and other kinds of private larceny, are connected with
stealing á pastésas, for in all dexterity of hand is required. Many of
the Gitánas of Madrid are provided with large pockets, or rather sacks,
beneath their gowns, in which they stow away their plunder. Some of
these pockets are capacious enough to hold, at one time, a dozen yards of
cloth, a Dutch cheese and a bottle of wine. Nothing that she can eat,
drink, or sell, comes amiss to a veritable Gitána; and sometimes the
contents of her pocket would afford materials for an inventory far more
lengthy and curious than the one enumerating the effects found on the
person of the man-mountain at Lilliput.
_Chiving Drao_.—In former times the Spanish Gypsies of both sexes were in
the habit of casting a venomous preparation into the mangers of the
cattle for the purpose of causing sickness. At present this practice has
ceased, or nearly so; the Gitános, however, talk of it as universal
amongst their ancestors. They were in the habit of visiting the stalls
and stables secretly, and poisoning the provender of the animals, who
almost immediately became sick. After a few days the Gitános would go to
the labourers and offer to cure the sick cattle for a certain sum, and if
their proposal was accepted would in effect perform the cure.
Connected with the cure was a curious piece of double dealing. They
privately administered an efficacious remedy, but pretended to cure the
animals not by medicines but by charms, which consisted of small
variegated beans, called in their language bobis, {262a} dropped into the
mangers. By this means they fostered the idea, already prevalent, that
they were people possessed of supernatural gifts and powers, who could
remove diseases without having recourse to medicine. By means of drao,
they likewise procured themselves food; poisoning swine, as their
brethren in England still do, {262b} and then feasting on the flesh,
which was abandoned as worthless: witness one of their own songs:—
‘By Gypsy drow the Porker died,
I saw him stiff at evening tide,
But I saw him not when morning shone,
For the Gypsies ate him flesh and bone.’
By drao also they could avenge themselves on their enemies by destroying
their cattle, without incurring a shadow of suspicion. Revenge for
injuries, real or imaginary, is sweet to all unconverted minds; to no one
more than the Gypsy, who, in all parts of the world, is, perhaps, the
most revengeful of human beings.
Vidocq in his memoirs states, that having formed a connection with an
individual whom he subsequently discovered to be the captain of a band of
Walachian Gypsies, the latter, whose name was Caroun, wished Vidocq to
assist in scattering certain powders in the mangers of the peasants’
cattle; Vidocq, from prudential motives, refused the employment. There
can be no doubt that these powders were, in substance, the drao of the
Spanish Gitános.
_La Bar Lachi_, _or the Loadstone_.—If the Gitános in general be addicted
to any one superstition, it is certainly with respect to this stone, to
which they attribute all kinds of miraculous powers. There can be no
doubt, that the singular property which it possesses of attracting steel,
by filling their untutored minds with amazement, first gave rise to this
veneration, which is carried beyond all reasonable bounds.
They believe that he who is in possession of it has nothing to fear from
steel or lead, from fire or water, and that death itself has no power
over him. The Gypsy contrabandistas are particularly anxious to procure
this stone, which they carry upon their persons in their expeditions;
they say, that in the event of being pursued by the jaracanallis, or
revenue officers, whirlwinds of dust will arise, and conceal them from
the view of their enemies; the horse-stealers say much the same thing,
and assert that they are uniformly successful, when they bear about them
the precious stone. But it is said to be able to effect much more.
Extraordinary things are related of its power in exciting the amorous
passions, and, on this account, it is in great request amongst the Gypsy
hags; all these women are procuresses, and find persons of both sexes
weak and wicked enough to make use of their pretended knowledge in the
composition of love-draughts and decoctions.
In the case of the loadstone, however, there is no pretence, the Gitánas
believing all they say respecting it, and still more; this is proved by
the eagerness with which they seek to obtain the stone in its natural
state, which is somewhat difficult to accomplish.
In the museum of natural curiosities at Madrid there is a large piece of
loadstone originally extracted from the American mines. There is
scarcely a Gitána in Madrid who is not acquainted with this circumstance,
and who does not long to obtain the stone, or a part of it; its being
placed in a royal museum serving to augment, in their opinion, its real
value. Several attempts have been made to steal it, all of which,
however, have been unsuccessful. The Gypsies seem not to be the only
people who envy royalty the possession of this stone. Pepita, the old
Gitána of whose talent at telling fortunes such honourable mention has
already been made, informed me that a priest, who was muy enamorado (in
love), proposed to her to steal the loadstone, offering her all his
sacerdotal garments in the event of success: whether the singular reward
that was promised had but slight temptations for her, or whether she
feared that her dexterity was not equal to the accomplishment of the
task, we know not, but she appears to have declined attempting it.
According to the Gypsy account, the person in love, if he wish to excite
a corresponding passion in another quarter by means of the loadstone,
must swallow, _in aguardiente_, a small portion of the stone pulverised,
at the time of going to rest, repeating to himself the following magic
rhyme:—
‘To the Mountain of Olives one morning I hied,
Three little black goats before me I spied,
Those three little goats on three cars I laid,
Black cheeses three from their milk I made;
The one I bestow on the loadstone of power,
That save me it may from all ills that lower;
The second to Mary Padilla I give,
And to all the witch hags about her that live;
The third I reserve for Asmodeus lame,
That fetch me he may whatever I name.’
_La raiz del buen Baron_, _or the root of the good Baron_.—On this
subject we cannot be very explicit. It is customary with the Gitánas to
sell, under this title, various roots and herbs, to unfortunate females
who are desirous of producing a certain result; these roots are boiled in
white wine, and the abominable decoction is taken fasting. I was once
shown the root of the good baron, which, in this instance, appeared to be
parsley root. By the good baron is meant his Satanic majesty, on whom
the root is very appropriately fathered.
CHAPTER VII
IT is impossible to dismiss the subject of the Spanish Gypsies without
offering some remarks on their marriage festivals. There is nothing
which they retain connected with their primitive rites and principles,
more characteristic perhaps of the sect of the Rommany, of the sect of
the _husbands and wives_, than what relates to the marriage ceremony,
which gives the female a protector, and the man a helpmate, a sharer of
his joys and sorrows. The Gypsies are almost entirely ignorant of the
grand points of morality; they have never had sufficient sense to
perceive that to lie, to steal, and to shed human blood violently, are
crimes which are sure, eventually, to yield bitter fruits to those who
perpetrate them; but on one point, and that one of no little importance
as far as temporal happiness is concerned, they are in general wiser than
those who have had far better opportunities than such unfortunate
outcasts, of regulating their steps, and distinguishing good from evil.
They know that chastity is a jewel of high price, and that conjugal
fidelity is capable of occasionally flinging a sunshine even over the
dreary hours of a life passed in the contempt of almost all laws, whether
human or divine.
There is a word in the Gypsy language to which those who speak it attach
ideas of peculiar reverence, far superior to that connected with the name
of the Supreme Being, the creator of themselves and the universe. This
word is _Lácha_, which with them is the corporeal chastity of the
females; we say corporeal chastity, for no other do they hold in the
slightest esteem; it is lawful amongst them, nay praiseworthy, to be
obscene in look, gesture, and discourse, to be accessories to vice, and
to stand by and laugh at the worst abominations of the Busné, provided
their _Lácha ye trupos_, or corporeal chastity, remains unblemished. The
Gypsy child, from her earliest years, is told by her strange mother, that
a good Calli need only dread one thing in this world, and that is the
loss of Lácha, in comparison with which that of life is of little
consequence, as in such an event she will be provided for, but what
provision is there for a Gypsy who has lost her Lácha? ‘Bear this in
mind, my child,’ she will say, ‘and now eat this bread, and go forth and
see what you can steal.’
A Gypsy girl is generally betrothed at the age of fourteen to the youth
whom her parents deem a suitable match, and who is generally a few years
older than herself. Marriage is invariably preceded by betrothment; and
the couple must then wait two years before their union can take place,
according to the law of the Calés. During this period it is expected
that they treat each other as common acquaintance; they are permitted to
converse, and even occasionally to exchange slight presents. One thing,
however, is strictly forbidden, and if in this instance they prove
contumacious, the betrothment is instantly broken and the pair are never
united, and thenceforward bear an evil reputation amongst their sect.
This one thing is, going into the campo in each other’s company, or
having any rendezvous beyond the gate of the city, town, or village, in
which they dwell. Upon this point we can perhaps do no better than quote
one of their own stanzas:—
‘Thy sire and mother wrath and hate
Have vowed against us, love!
The first, first night that from the gate
We two together rove.’
With all the other Gypsies, however, and with the Busné or Gentiles, the
betrothed female is allowed the freest intercourse, going whither she
will, and returning at all times and seasons. With respect to the Busné,
indeed, the parents are invariably less cautious than with their own
race, as they conceive it next to an impossibility that their child
should lose her Lácha by any intercourse with _the white blood_; and true
it is that experience has proved that their confidence in this respect is
not altogether idle. The Gitánas have in general a decided aversion to
the white men; some few instances, however, to the contrary are said to
have occurred.
A short time previous to the expiration of the term of the betrothment,
preparations are made for the Gypsy bridal. The wedding-day is certainly
an eventful period in the life of every individual, as he takes a partner
for better or for worse, whom he is bound to cherish through riches and
poverty; but to the Gypsy particularly the wedding festival is an
important affair. If he is rich, he frequently becomes poor before it is
terminated; and if he is poor, he loses the little which he possesses,
and must borrow of his brethren; frequently involving himself throughout
life, to procure the means of giving a festival; for without a festival,
he could not become a Rom, that is, a husband, and would cease to belong
to this sect of Rommany.
There is a great deal of what is wild and barbarous attached to these
festivals. I shall never forget a particular one at which I was present.
After much feasting, drinking, and yelling, in the Gypsy house, the
bridal train sallied forth—a frantic spectacle. First of all marched a
villainous jockey-looking fellow, holding in his hands, uplifted, a long
pole, at the top of which fluttered in the morning air a snow-white
cambric handkerchief, emblem of the bride’s purity. Then came the
betrothed pair, followed by their nearest friends; then a rabble rout of
Gypsies, screaming and shouting, and discharging guns and pistols, till
all around rang with the din, and the village dogs barked. On arriving
at the church gate, the fellow who bore the pole stuck it into the ground
with a loud huzza, and the train, forming two ranks, defiled into the
church on either side of the pole and its strange ornaments. On the
conclusion of the ceremony, they returned in the same manner in which
they had come.
Throughout the day there was nothing going on but singing, drinking,
feasting, and dancing; but the most singular part of the festival was
reserved for the dark night. Nearly a ton weight of sweetmeats had been
prepared, at an enormous expense, not for the gratification of the
palate, but for a purpose purely Gypsy. These sweetmeats of all kinds,
and of all forms, but principally yémas, or yolks of eggs prepared with a
crust of sugar (a delicious bonne-bouche), were strewn on the floor of a
large room, at least to the depth of three inches. Into this room, at a
given signal, tripped the bride and bridegroom _dancing romális_,
followed amain by all the Gitános and Gitánas, _dancing romális_. To
convey a slight idea of the scene is almost beyond the power of words.
In a few minutes the sweetmeats were reduced to a powder, or rather to a
mud, the dancers were soiled to the knees with sugar, fruits, and yolks
of eggs. Still more terrific became the lunatic merriment. The men
sprang high into the air, neighed, brayed, and crowed; whilst the Gitánas
snapped their fingers in their own fashion, louder than castanets,
distorting their forms into all kinds of obscene attitudes, and uttering
words to repeat which were an abomination. In a corner of the apartment
capered the while Sebastianillo, a convict Gypsy from Melilla, strumming
the guitar most furiously, and producing demoniacal sounds which had some
resemblance to Malbrun (Malbrouk), and, as he strummed, repeating at
intervals the Gypsy modification of the song:—
‘Chalá Malbrún chinguerár,
Birandón, birandón, birandéra—
Chalá Malbrún chinguerár,
No sé bus truterá—
No sé bus truterá.
No sé bus truterá.
La romí que le caméla,
Birandón, birandón,’ etc.
The festival endures three days, at the end of which the greatest part of
the property of the bridegroom, even if he were previously in easy
circumstances, has been wasted in this strange kind of riot and
dissipation. Paco, the Gypsy of Badajoz, attributed his ruin to the
extravagance of his marriage festival; and many other Gitános have
confessed the same thing of themselves. They said that throughout the
three days they appeared to be under the influence of infatuation, having
no other wish or thought but to make away with their substance; some have
gone so far as to cast money by handfuls into the street. Throughout the
three days all the doors are kept open, and all corners, whether Gypsies
or Busné, welcomed with a hospitality which knows no bounds.
In nothing do the Jews and Gitános more resemble each other than in their
marriages, and what is connected therewith. In both sects there is a
betrothment: amongst the Jews for seven, amongst the Gitános for a period
of two years. In both there is a wedding festival, which endures amongst
the Jews for fifteen and amongst the Gitános for three days, during
which, on both sides, much that is singular and barbarous occurs, which,
however, has perhaps its origin in antiquity the most remote. But the
wedding ceremonies of the Jews are far more complex and allegorical than
those of the Gypsies, a more simple people. The Nazarene gazes on these
ceremonies with mute astonishment; the washing of the bride—the painting
of the face of herself and her companions with chalk and carmine—her
ensconcing herself within the curtains of the bed with her female bevy,
whilst the bridegroom hides himself within his apartment with the youths
his companions—her envelopment in the white sheet, in which she appears
like a corse, the bridegroom’s going to sup with her, when he places
himself in the middle of the apartment with his eyes shut, and without
tasting a morsel. His going to the synagogue, and then repairing to
breakfast with the bride, where he practises the same self-denial—the
washing of the bridegroom’s plate and sending it after him, that he may
break his fast—the binding his hands behind him—his ransom paid by the
bride’s mother—the visit of the sages to the bridegroom—the mulct imposed
in case he repent—the killing of the bullock at the house of the
bridegroom—the present of meat and fowls, meal and spices, to the
bride—the gold and silver—that most imposing part of the ceremony, the
walking of the bride by torchlight to the house of her betrothed, her
eyes fixed in vacancy, whilst the youths of her kindred sing their wild
songs around her—the cup of milk and the spoon presented to her by the
bridegroom’s mother—the arrival of the sages in the morn—the reading of
the Ketuba—the night—the half-enjoyment—the old woman—the tantalising
knock at the door—and then the festival of fishes which concludes all,
and leaves the jaded and wearied couple to repose after a fortnight of
persecution.
The Jews, like the Gypsies, not unfrequently ruin themselves by the riot
and waste of their marriage festivals. Throughout the entire fortnight,
the houses, both of bride and bridegroom, are flung open to all
corners;—feasting and song occupy the day—feasting and song occupy the
hours of the night, and this continued revel is only broken by the
ceremonies of which we have endeavoured to convey a faint idea. In these
festivals the sages or _ulemma_ take a distinguished part, doing their
utmost to ruin the contracted parties, by the wonderful despatch which
they make of the fowls and viands, sweetmeats, _and strong waters_
provided for the occasion.
After marriage the Gypsy females generally continue faithful to their
husbands through life; giving evidence that the exhortations of their
mothers in early life have not been without effect. Of course licentious
females are to be found both amongst the matrons and the unmarried; but
such instances are rare, and must be considered in the light of
exceptions to a principle. The Gypsy women (I am speaking of those of
Spain), as far as corporeal chastity goes, are very paragons; but in
other respects, alas!—little can be said in praise of their morality.
CHAPTER VIII
WHILST in Spain I devoted as much time as I could spare from my grand
object, which was to circulate the Gospel through that benighted country,
to attempt to enlighten the minds of the Gitános on the subject of
religion. I cannot say that I experienced much success in my endeavours;
indeed, I never expected much, being fully acquainted with the stony
nature of the ground on which I was employed; perhaps some of the seed
that I scattered may eventually spring up and yield excellent fruit. Of
one thing I am certain: if I did the Gitános no good, I did them no harm.
It has been said that there is a secret monitor, or conscience, within
every heart, which immediately upbraids the individual on the commission
of a crime; this may be true, but certainly the monitor within the Gitáno
breast is a very feeble one, for little attention is ever paid to its
reproofs. With regard to conscience, be it permitted to observe, that it
varies much according to climate, country, and religion; perhaps nowhere
is it so terrible and strong as in England; I need not say why. Amongst
the English, I have seen many individuals stricken low, and
broken-hearted, by the force of conscience; but never amongst the
Spaniards or Italians; and I never yet could observe that the crimes
which the Gitános were daily and hourly committing occasioned them the
slightest uneasiness.
One important discovery I made among them: it was, that no individual,
however wicked and hardened, is utterly _godless_. Call it superstition,
if you will, still a certain fear and reverence of something sacred and
supreme would hang about them. I have heard Gitános stiffly deny the
existence of a Deity, and express the utmost contempt for everything
holy; yet they subsequently never failed to contradict themselves, by
permitting some expression to escape which belied their assertions, and
of this I shall presently give a remarkable instance.
I found the women much more disposed to listen to anything I had to say
than the men, who were in general so taken up with their traffic that
they could think and talk of nothing else; the women, too, had more
curiosity and more intelligence; the conversational powers of some of
them I found to be very great, and yet they were destitute of the
slightest rudiments of education, and were thieves by profession. At
Madrid I had regular conversaziones, or, as they are called in Spanish,
tertúlias, with these women, who generally visited me twice a week; they
were perfectly unreserved towards me with respect to their actions and
practices, though their behaviour, when present, was invariably strictly
proper. I have already had cause to mention Pépa the sibyl, and her
daughter-in-law, Chicharona; the manners of the first were sometimes
almost elegant, though, next to Aurora, she was the most notorious
she-thug in Madrid; Chicharona was good-humoured, like most fat
personages. Pépa had likewise two daughters, one of whom, a very
remarkable female, was called La Tuérta, from the circumstance of her
having but one eye, and the other, who was a girl of about thirteen, La
Casdamí, or the scorpion, from the malice which she occasionally
displayed.
Pépa and Chicharona were invariably my most constant visitors. One day
in winter they arrived as usual; the One-eyed and the Scorpion following
behind.
_Myself_.—‘I am glad to see you, Pépa: what have you been doing this
morning?’
_Pépa_.—‘I have been telling baji, and Chicharona has been stealing á
pastésas; we have had but little success, and have come to warm ourselves
at the braséro. As for the One-eyed, she is a very sluggard (holgazána),
she will neither tell fortunes nor steal.’
_The One-eyed_.—‘Hold your peace, mother of the Bengues; I will steal,
when I see occasion, but it shall not be á pastésas, and I will hokkawar
(deceive), but it shall not be by telling fortunes. If I deceive, it
shall be by horses, by jockeying. {276} If I steal, it shall be on the
road—I’ll rob. You know already what I am capable of, yet knowing that,
you would have me tell fortunes like yourself, or steal like Chicharona.
Me diñela cónche (it fills me with fury) to be asked to tell fortunes,
and the next Busnee that talks to me of bajis, I will knock all her teeth
out.’
_The Scorpion_.—‘My sister is right; I, too, would sooner be a salteadóra
(highwaywoman), or a chalána (she-jockey), than steal with the hands, or
tell bájis.’
_Myself_.—‘You do not mean to say, O Tuérta, that you are a jockey, and
that you rob on the highway.’
_The One-eyed_.—‘I am a chalána, brother, and many a time I have robbed
upon the road, as all our people know. I dress myself as a man, and go
forth with some of them. I have robbed alone, in the pass of the
Guadarama, with my horse and escopéta. I alone once robbed a cuadrilla
of twenty Gallégos, who were returning to their own country, after
cutting the harvests of Castile; I stripped them of their earnings, and
could have stripped them of their very clothes had I wished, for they
were down on their knees like cowards. I love a brave man, be he Busné
or Gypsy. When I was not much older than the Scorpion, I went with
several others to rob the cortíjo of an old man; it was more than twenty
leagues from here. We broke in at midnight, and bound the old man: we
knew he had money; but he said no, and would not tell us where it was; so
we tortured him, pricking him with our knives and burning his hands over
the lamp; all, however, would not do. At last I said, “Let us try the
_pimientos_”; so we took the green pepper husks, pulled open his eyelids,
and rubbed the pupils with the green pepper fruit. That was the worst
pinch of all. Would you believe it? the old man bore it. Then our
people said, “Let us kill him,” but I said, no, it were a pity: so we
spared him, though we got nothing. I have loved that old man ever since
for his firm heart, and should have wished him for a husband.’
_The Scorpion_.—‘Ojalá, that I had been in that cortíjo, to see such
sport!’
_Myself_.—‘Do you fear God, O Tuérta?’
_The One-eyed_.—‘Brother, I fear nothing.’
_Myself_.—‘Do you believe in God, O Tuérta?’
_The One-eyed_.—‘Brother, I do not; I hate all connected with that name;
the whole is folly; me diñela cónche. If I go to church, it is but to
spit at the images. I spat at the búlto of María this morning; and I
love the Corojai, and the Londoné, {278a} because they are not baptized.’
_Myself_.—‘You, of course, never say a prayer.’
_The One-eyed_.—‘No, no; there are three or four old words, taught me by
some old people, which I sometimes say to myself; I believe they have
both force and virtue.’
_Myself_.—‘I would fain hear; pray tell me them.’
_The One-eyed_.—‘Brother, they are words not to be repeated.’
_Myself_.—‘Why not?’
_The One-eyed_.—‘They are holy words, brother.’
_Myself_.—‘Holy! You say there is no God; if there be none, there can be
nothing holy; pray tell me the words, O Tuérta.’
_The One-eyed_.—‘Brother, I dare not.’
_Myself_.—‘Then you do fear something.’
_The One-eyed_.—‘Not I—
‘_Saboca Enrecar María Ereria_, {278b}
and now I wish I had not said them.’
_Myself_.—‘You are distracted, O Tuérta: the words say simply, ‘Dwell
within us, blessed Maria.’ You have spitten on her búlto this morning in
the church, and now you are afraid to repeat four words, amongst which is
her name.’
_The One-eyed_.—‘I did not understand them; but I wish I had not said
them.’
. . . . .
I repeat that there is no individual, however hardened, who is utterly
_godless_.
The reader will have already gathered from the conversations reported in
this volume, and especially from the last, that there is a wide
difference between addressing Spanish Gitános and Gitánas and English
peasantry: of a certainty what will do well for the latter is calculated
to make no impression on these thievish half-wild people. Try them with
the Gospel, I hear some one cry, which speaks to all: I did try them with
the Gospel, and in their own language. I commenced with Pépa and
Chicharona. Determined that they should understand it, I proposed that
they themselves should translate it. They could neither read nor write,
which, however, did not disqualify them from being translators. I had
myself previously translated the whole Testament into the Spanish
Rommany, but I was desirous to circulate amongst the Gitános a version
conceived in the exact language in which they express their ideas. The
women made no objection, they were fond of our tertúlias, and they
likewise reckoned on one small glass of Malaga wine, with which I
invariably presented them. Upon the whole, they conducted themselves
much better than could have been expected. We commenced with Saint Luke:
they rendering into Rommany the sentences which I delivered to them in
Spanish. They proceeded as far as the eighth chapter, in the middle of
which they broke down. Was that to be wondered at? The only thing which
astonished me was, that I had induced two such strange beings to advance
so far in a task so unwonted, and so entirely at variance with their
habits, as translation.
These chapters I frequently read over to them, explaining the subject in
the best manner I was able. They said it was lachó, and jucál, and
mistó, all of which words express approval of the quality of a thing.
Were they improved, were their hearts softened by these Scripture
lectures? I know not. Pépa committed a rather daring theft shortly
afterwards, which compelled her to conceal herself for a fortnight; it is
quite possible, however, that she may remember the contents of those
chapters on her death-bed; if so, will the attempt have been a futile
one?
I completed the translation, supplying deficiencies from my own version
begun at Badajoz in 1836. This translation I printed at Madrid in 1838;
it was the first book which ever appeared in Rommany, and was called
‘Embéo e Majaro Lucas,’ or Gospel of Luke the Saint. I likewise
published, simultaneously, the same Gospel in Basque, which, however, I
had no opportunity of circulating.
The Gitános of Madrid purchased the Gypsy Luke freely: many of the men
understood it, and prized it highly, induced of course more by the
language than the doctrine; the women were particularly anxious to obtain
copies, though unable to read; but each wished to have one in her pocket,
especially when engaged in thieving expeditions, for they all looked upon
it in the light of a charm, which would preserve them from all danger and
mischance; some even went so far as to say, that in this respect it was
equally efficacious as the Bar Lachí, or loadstone, which they are in
general so desirous of possessing. Of this Gospel {281} five hundred
copies were printed, of which the greater number I contrived to circulate
amongst the Gypsies in various parts; I cast the book upon the waters and
left it to its destiny.
I have counted seventeen Gitánas assembled at one time in my apartment in
the Calle de Santiágo in Madrid; for the first quarter of an hour we
generally discoursed upon indifferent matters, I then by degrees drew
their attention to religion and the state of souls. I finally became so
bold that I ventured to speak against their inveterate practices,
thieving and lying, telling fortunes, and stealing á pastésas; this was
touching upon delicate ground, and I experienced much opposition and much
feminine clamour. I persevered, however, and they finally assented to
all I said, not that I believe that my words made much impression upon
their hearts. In a few months matters were so far advanced that they
would sing a hymn; I wrote one expressly for them in Rommany, in which
their own wild couplets were, to a certain extent, imitated.
The people of the street in which I lived, seeing such numbers of these
strange females continually passing in and out, were struck with
astonishment, and demanded the reason. The answers which they obtained
by no means satisfied them. ‘Zeal for the conversion of souls,—the souls
too of Gitánas,—disparáte! the fellow is a scoundrel. Besides he is an
Englishman, and is not baptized; what cares he for souls? They visit him
for other purposes. He makes base ounces, which they carry away and
circulate. Madrid is already stocked with false money.’ Others were of
opinion that we met for the purposes of sorcery and abomination. The
Spaniard has no conception that other springs of action exist than
interest or villainy.
My little congregation, if such I may call it, consisted entirely of
women; the men seldom or never visited me, save they stood in need of
something which they hoped to obtain from me. This circumstance I little
regretted, their manners and conversation being the reverse of
interesting. It must not, however, be supposed that, even with the
women, matters went on invariably in a smooth and satisfactory manner.
The following little anecdote will show what slight dependence can be
placed upon them, and how disposed they are at all times to take part in
what is grotesque and malicious. One day they arrived, attended by a
Gypsy jockey whom I had never previously seen. We had scarcely been
seated a minute, when this fellow, rising, took me to the window, and
without any preamble or circumlocution, said—‘Don Jorge, you shall lend
me two barias’ (ounces of gold). ‘Not to your whole race, my excellent
friend,’ said I; ‘are you frantic? Sit down and be discreet.’ He obeyed
me literally, sat down, and when the rest departed, followed with them.
We did not invariably meet at my own house, but occasionally at one in a
street inhabited by Gypsies. On the appointed day I went to this house,
where I found the women assembled; the jockey was also present. On
seeing me he advanced, again took me aside, and again said—‘Don Jorge,
you shall lend me two barias.’ I made him no answer, but at once entered
on the subject which brought me thither. I spoke for some time in
Spanish; I chose for the theme of my discourse the situation of the
Hebrews in Egypt, and pointed out its similarity to that of the Gitános
in Spain. I spoke of the power of God, manifested in preserving both as
separate and distinct people amongst the nations until the present day.
I warmed with my subject. I subsequently produced a manuscript book,
from which I read a portion of Scripture, and the Lord’s Prayer and
Apostles’ Creed, in Rommany. When I had concluded I looked around me.
The features of the assembly were twisted, and the eyes of all turned
upon me with a frightful squint; not an individual present but
squinted,—the genteel Pépa, the good-humoured Chicharona, the Casdamí,
etc. etc. The Gypsy fellow, the contriver of the jest, squinted worst of
all. Such are Gypsies.
THE ZINCALI
PART III
CHAPTER I
THERE is no nation in the world, however exalted or however degraded, but
is in possession of some peculiar poetry. If the Chinese, the Hindoos,
the Greeks, and the Persians, those splendid and renowned races, have
their moral lays, their mythological epics, their tragedies, and their
immortal love songs, so also have the wild and barbarous tribes of
Soudan, and the wandering Esquimaux, their ditties, which, however
insignificant in comparison with the compositions of the former nations,
still are entitled in every essential point to the name of poetry; if
poetry mean metrical compositions intended to soothe and recreate the
mind fatigued by the cares, distresses, and anxieties to which mortality
is subject.
The Gypsies too have their poetry. Of that of the Russian Zigani we have
already said something. It has always been our opinion, and we believe
that in this we are by no means singular, that in nothing can the
character of a people be read with greater certainty and exactness than
in its songs. How truly do the warlike ballads of the Northmen and the
Danes, their _drapas_ and _kæmpe-viser_, depict the character of the
Goth; and how equally do the songs of the Arabians, replete with homage
to the one high, uncreated, and eternal God, ‘the fountain of blessing,’
‘the only conqueror,’ lay bare to us the mind of the Moslem of the
desert, whose grand characteristic is religious veneration, and
uncompromising zeal for the glory of the Creator.
And well and truly do the coplas and gachaplas of the Gitános depict the
character of the race. This poetry, for poetry we will call it, is in
most respects such as might be expected to originate among people of
their class; a set of Thugs, subsisting by cheating and villainy of every
description; hating the rest of the human species, and bound to each
other by the bonds of common origin, language, and pursuits. The general
themes of this poetry are the various incidents of Gitáno life and the
feelings of the Gitános. A Gypsy sees a pig running down a hill, and
imagines that it cries ‘Ustilame Caloro!’ {288}—a Gypsy reclining sick on
the prison floor beseeches his wife to intercede with the alcayde for the
removal of the chain, the weight of which is bursting his body—the moon
arises, and two Gypsies, who are about to steal a steed, perceive a
Spaniard, and instantly flee—Juanito Ralli, whilst going home on his
steed, is stabbed by a Gypsy who hates him—Facundo, a Gypsy, runs away at
the sight of the burly priest of Villa Franca, who hates all Gypsies.
Sometimes a burst of wild temper gives occasion to a strain—the swarthy
lover threatens to slay his betrothed, even _at the feet of Jesus_,
should she prove unfaithful. It is a general opinion amongst the Gitános
that Spanish women are very fond of Rommany chals and Rommany. There is
a stanza in which a Gitáno hopes to bear away a beauty of Spanish race by
means of a word of Rommany whispered in her ear at the window.
Amongst these effusions are even to be found tender and beautiful
thoughts; for Thugs and Gitános have their moments of gentleness. True
it is that such are few and far between, as a flower or a shrub is here
and there seen springing up from the interstices of the rugged and
frightful rocks of which the Spanish sierras are composed: a wicked
mother is afraid to pray to the Lord with her own lips, and calls on her
innocent babe to beseech him to restore peace and comfort to her heart—an
imprisoned youth appears to have no earthly friend on whom he can rely,
save his sister, and wishes for a messenger to carry unto her the tale of
his sufferings, confident that she would hasten at once to his
assistance. And what can be more touching than the speech of the
relenting lover to the fair one whom he has outraged?
‘Extend to me the hand so small,
Wherein I see thee weep,
For O thy balmy tear-drops all
I would collect and keep.’
This Gypsy poetry consists of quartets, or rather couplets, but two
rhymes being discernible, and those generally imperfect, the vowels alone
agreeing in sound. Occasionally, however, sixains, or stanzas of six
lines, are to be found, but this is of rare occurrence. The thought,
anecdote or adventure described, is seldom carried beyond one stanza, in
which everything is expressed which the poet wishes to impart. This
feature will appear singular to those who are unacquainted with the
character of the popular poetry of the south, and are accustomed to the
redundancy and frequently tedious repetition of a more polished muse. It
will be well to inform such that the greater part of the poetry sung in
the south, and especially in Spain, is extemporary. The musician
composes it at the stretch of his voice, whilst his fingers are tugging
at the guitar; which style of composition is by no means favourable to a
long and connected series of thought. Of course, the greater part of
this species of poetry perishes as soon as born. A stanza, however, is
sometimes caught up by the bystanders, and committed to memory; and being
frequently repeated, makes, in time, the circuit of the country. For
example, the stanza about Coruncho Lopez, which was originally made at
the gate of a venta by a Miquelet, {290} who was conducting the said
Lopez to the galleys for a robbery. It is at present sung through the
whole of the peninsula, however insignificant it may sound to foreign
ears:—
‘Coruncho Lopez, gallant lad,
A smuggling he would ride;
He stole his father’s ambling prad,
And therefore to the galleys sad
Coruncho now I guide.’
The couplets of the Gitános are composed in the same off-hand manner, and
exactly resemble in metre the popular ditties of the Spaniards. In
spirit, however, as well as language, they are in general widely
different, as they mostly relate to the Gypsies and their affairs, and
not unfrequently abound with abuse of the Busné or Spaniards. Many of
these creations have, like the stanza of Coruncho Lopez, been wafted over
Spain amongst the Gypsy tribes, and are even frequently repeated by the
Spaniards themselves; at least, by those who affect to imitate the
phraseology of the Gitános. Those which appear in the present collection
consist partly of such couplets, and partly of such as we have ourselves
taken down, as soon as they originated, not unfrequently in the midst of
a circle of these singular people, dancing and singing to their wild
music. In no instance have they been subjected to modification; and the
English translation is, in general, very faithful to the original, as
will easily be perceived by referring to the lexicon. To those who may
feel disposed to find fault with or criticise these songs, we have to
observe, that the present work has been written with no other view than
to depict the Gitános such as they are, and to illustrate their
character; and, on that account, we have endeavoured, as much as
possible, to bring them before the reader, and to make them speak for
themselves. They are a half-civilised, unlettered people, proverbial for
a species of knavish acuteness, which serves them in lieu of wisdom. To
place in the mouth of such beings the high-flown sentiments of modern
poetry would not answer our purpose, though several authors have not
shrunk from such an absurdity.
These couplets have been collected in Estremadura and New Castile, in
Valencia and Andalusia; the four provinces where the Gitáno race most
abounds. We wish, however, to remark, that they constitute scarcely a
tenth part of our original gleanings, from which we have selected one
hundred of the most remarkable and interesting.
The language of the originals will convey an exact idea of the Rommany of
Spain, as used at the present day amongst the Gitános in the fairs, when
they are buying and selling animals, and wish to converse with each other
in a way unintelligible to the Spaniards. We are free to confess that it
is a mere broken jargon, but it answers the purpose of those who use it;
and it is but just to remark that many of its elements are of the most
remote antiquity, and the most illustrious descent, as will be shown
hereafter. We have uniformly placed the original by the side of the
translation; for though unwilling to make the Gitános speak in any other
manner than they are accustomed, we are equally averse to have it
supposed that many of the thoughts and expressions which occur in these
songs, and which are highly objectionable, originated with ourselves.
{292}
RHYMES OF THE GITÁNOS
Unto a refuge me they led,
To save from dungeon drear;
Then sighing to my wife I said,
I leave my baby dear.
Back from the refuge soon I sped,
My child’s sweet face to see;
Then sternly to my wife I said,
You’ve seen the last of me.
O when I sit my courser bold,
My bantling in my rear,
And in my hand my musket hold,
O how they quake with fear.
Pray, little baby, pray the Lord,
Since guiltless still thou art,
That peace and comfort he afford
To this poor troubled heart.
The false Juanito, day and night,
Had best with caution go,
The Gypsy carles of Yeira height
Have sworn to lay him low.
There runs a swine down yonder hill,
As fast as e’er he can,
And as he runs he crieth still,
Come, steal me, Gypsy man.
I wash’d not in the limpid flood
The shirt which binds my frame;
But in Juanito Ralli’s blood
I bravely wash’d the same.
I sallied forth upon my grey,
With him my hated foe,
And when we reach’d the narrow way
I dealt a dagger blow.
To blessed Jesus’ holy feet
I’d rush to kill and slay
My plighted lass so fair and sweet,
Should she the wanton play.
I for a cup of water cried,
But they refus’d my prayer,
Then straight into the road I hied,
And fell to robbing there.
I ask’d for fire to warm my frame,
But they’d have scorn’d my prayer,
If I, to pay them for the same,
Had stripp’d my body bare.
Then came adown the village street,
With little babes that cry,
Because they have no crust to eat,
A Gypsy company;
And as no charity they meet,
They curse the Lord on high.
I left my house and walk’d about,
They seized me fast and bound;
It is a Gypsy thief, they shout,
The Spaniards here have found.
From out the prison me they led,
Before the scribe they brought;
It is no Gypsy thief, he said,
The Spaniards here have caught.
Throughout the night, the dusky night,
I prowl in silence round,
And with my eyes look left and right,
For him, the Spanish hound,
That with my knife I him may smite,
And to the vitals wound.
Will no one to the sister bear
News of her brother’s plight,
How in this cell of dark despair,
To cruel death he’s dight?
The Lord, as e’en the Gentiles state,
By Egypt’s race was bred,
And when he came to man’s estate,
His blood the Gentiles shed.
O never with the Gentiles wend,
Nor deem their speeches true;
Or else, be certain in the end
Thy blood will lose its hue.
From out the prison me they bore,
Upon an ass they placed,
And scourg’d me till I dripp’d with gore,
As down the road it paced.
They bore me from the prison nook,
They bade me rove at large;
When out I’d come a gun I took,
And scathed them with its charge.
My mule so bonny I bestrode,
To Portugal I’d flee,
And as I o’er the water rode
A man came suddenly;
And he his love and kindness show’d
By setting his dog on me.
Unless within a fortnight’s space
Thy face, O maid, I see;
Flamenca, of Egyptian race,
My lady love shall be.
Flamenca, of Egyptian race,
If thou wert only mine,
Within a bonny crystal case
For life I’d thee enshrine.
Sire nor mother me caress,
For I have none on earth;
One little brother I possess,
And he’s a fool by birth.
Thy sire and mother wrath and hate
Have vow’d against me, love!
The first, first night that from the gate
We two together rove.
Come to the window, sweet love, do,
And I will whisper there,
In Rommany, a word or two,
And thee far off will bear.
A Gypsy stripling’s sparkling eye
Has pierced my bosom’s core,
A feat no eye beneath the sky
Could e’er effect before.
Dost bid me from the land begone,
And thou with child by me?
Each time I come, the little one,
I’ll greet in Rommany.
With such an ugly, loathly wife
The Lord has punish’d me;
I dare not take her for my life
Where’er the Spaniards be.
O, I am not of gentle clan,
I’m sprung from Gypsy tree;
And I will be no gentleman,
But an Egyptian free.
On high arose the moon so fair,
The Gypsy ’gan to sing:
I see a Spaniard coming there,
I must be on the wing.
This house of harlotry doth smell,
I flee as from the pest;
Your mother likes my sire too well;
To hie me home is best.
The girl I love more dear than life,
Should other gallant woo,
I’d straight unsheath my dudgeon knife
And cut his weasand through;
Or he, the conqueror in the strife,
The same to me should do.
Loud sang the Spanish cavalier,
And thus his ditty ran:
God send the Gypsy lassie here,
And not the Gypsy man.
At midnight, when the moon began
To show her silver flame,
There came to him no Gypsy man,
The Gypsy lassie came.
CHAPTER II
THE Gitános, abject and vile as they have ever been, have nevertheless
found admirers in Spain, individuals who have taken pleasure in their
phraseology, pronunciation, and way of life; but above all, in the songs
and dances of the females. This desire for cultivating their
acquaintance is chiefly prevalent in Andalusia, where, indeed, they most
abound; and more especially in the town of Seville, the capital of the
province, where, in the barrio or Faubourg of Triana, a large Gitáno
colon has long flourished, with the denizens of which it is at all times
easy to have intercourse, especially to those who are free of their
money, and are willing to purchase such a gratification at the expense of
dollars and pesetas.
When we consider the character of the Andalusians in general, we shall
find little to surprise us in this predilection for the Gitános. They
are an indolent frivolous people, fond of dancing and song, and sensual
amusements. They live under the most glorious sun and benign heaven in
Europe, and their country is by nature rich and fertile, yet in no
province of Spain is there more beggary and misery; the greater part of
the land being uncultivated, and producing nothing but thorns and
brushwood, affording in itself a striking emblem of the moral state of
its inhabitants.
Though not destitute of talent, the Andalusians are not much addicted to
intellectual pursuits, at least in the present day. The person in most
esteem among them is invariably the greatest _majo_, and to acquire that
character it is necessary to appear in the dress of a Merry Andrew, to
bully, swagger, and smoke continually, to dance passably, and to strum
the guitar. They are fond of obscenity and what they term _picardías_.
Amongst them learning is at a terrible discount, Greek, Latin, or any of
the languages generally termed learned, being considered in any light but
accomplishments, but not so the possession of thieves’ slang or the
dialect of the Gitános, the knowledge of a few words of which invariably
creates a certain degree of respect, as indicating that the individual is
somewhat versed in that kind of life or _trato_ for which alone the
Andalusians have any kind of regard.
In Andalusia the Gitáno has been studied by those who, for various
reasons, have mingled with the Gitános. It is tolerably well understood
by the chalans, or jockeys, who have picked up many words in the fairs
and market-places which the former frequent. It has, however, been
cultivated to a greater degree by other individuals, who have sought the
society of the Gitános from a zest for their habits, their dances, and
their songs; and such individuals have belonged to all classes, amongst
them have been noblemen and members of the priestly order.
Perhaps no people in Andalusia have been more addicted in general to the
acquaintance of the Gitános than the friars, and pre-eminently amongst
these the half-jockey half-religious personages of the Cartujan convent
at Xeres. This community, now suppressed, was, as is well known, in
possession of a celebrated breed of horses, which fed in the pastures of
the convent, and from which they derived no inconsiderable part of their
revenue. These reverend gentlemen seem to have been much better versed
in the points of a horse than in points of theology, and to have
understood thieves’ slang and Gitáno far better than the language of the
Vulgate. A chalan, who had some knowledge of the Gitáno, related to me
the following singular anecdote in connection with this subject.
He had occasion to go to the convent, having been long in treaty with the
friars for a steed which he had been commissioned by a nobleman to buy at
any reasonable price. The friars, however, were exorbitant in their
demands. On arriving at the gate, he sang to the friar who opened it a
couplet which he had composed in the Gypsy tongue, in which he stated the
highest price which he was authorised to give for the animal in question;
whereupon the friar instantly answered in the same tongue in an
extemporary couplet full of abuse of him and his employer, and forthwith
slammed the door in the face of the disconcerted jockey.
An Augustine friar of Seville, called, we believe, Father Manso, who
lived some twenty years ago, is still remembered for his passion for the
Gitános; he seemed to be under the influence of fascination, and passed
every moment that he could steal from his clerical occupations in their
company. His conduct at last became so notorious that he fell under the
censure of the Inquisition, before which he was summoned; whereupon he
alleged, in his defence, that his sole motive for following the Gitános
was zeal for their spiritual conversion. Whether this plea availed him
we know not; but it is probable that the Holy Office dealt mildly with
him; such offenders, indeed, have never had much to fear from it. Had he
been accused of liberalism, or searching into the Scriptures, instead of
connection with the Gitános, we should, doubtless, have heard either of
his execution or imprisonment for life in the cells of the cathedral of
Seville.
Such as are thus addicted to the Gitános and their language, are called,
in Andalusia, Los del’ Aficion, or those of the predilection. These
people have, during the last fifty years, composed a spurious kind of
Gypsy literature: we call it spurious because it did not originate with
the Gitános, who are, moreover, utterly unacquainted with it, and to whom
it would be for the most part unintelligible. It is somewhat difficult
to conceive the reason which induced these individuals to attempt such
compositions; the only probable one seems to have been a desire to
display to each other their skill in the language of their predilection.
It is right, however, to observe, that most of these compositions, with
respect to language, are highly absurd, the greatest liberties being
taken with the words picked up amongst the Gitános, of the true meaning
of which the writers, in many instances, seem to have been entirely
ignorant. From what we can learn, the composers of this literature
flourished chiefly at the commencement of the present century: Father
Manso is said to have been one of the last. Many of their compositions,
which are both in poetry and prose, exist in manuscript in a compilation
made by one Luis Lobo. It has never been our fortune to see this
compilation, which, indeed, we scarcely regret, as a rather curious
circumstance has afforded us a perfect knowledge of its contents.
Whilst at Seville, chance made us acquainted with a highly extraordinary
individual, a tall, bony, meagre figure, in a tattered Andalusian hat,
ragged capote, and still more ragged pantaloons, and seemingly between
forty and fifty years of age. The only appellation to which he answered
was Manuel. His occupation, at the time we knew him, was selling tickets
for the lottery, by which he obtained a miserable livelihood in Seville
and the neighbouring villages. His appearance was altogether wild and
uncouth, and there was an insane expression in his eye. Observing us one
day in conversation with a Gitána, he addressed us, and we soon found
that the sound of the Gitáno language had struck a chord which vibrated
through the depths of his soul. His history was remarkable; in his early
youth a manuscript copy of the compilation of Luis Lobo had fallen into
his hands. This book had so taken hold of his imagination, that he
studied it night and day until he had planted it in his memory from
beginning to end; but in so doing, his brain, like that of the hero of
Cervantes, had become dry and heated, so that he was unfitted for any
serious or useful occupation. After the death of his parents he wandered
about the streets in great distress, until at last he fell into the hands
of certain toreros, or bull-fighters, who kept him about them, in order
that he might repeat to them the songs of the _Aficion_. They
subsequently carried him to Madrid, where, however, they soon deserted
him after he had experienced much brutality from their hands. He
returned to Seville, and soon became the inmate of a madhouse, where he
continued several years. Having partially recovered from his malady, he
was liberated, and wandered about as before. During the cholera at
Seville, when nearly twenty thousand human beings perished, he was
appointed conductor of one of the death-carts, which went through the
streets for the purpose of picking up the dead bodies. His perfect
inoffensiveness eventually procured him friends, and he obtained the
situation of vendor of lottery tickets. He frequently visited us, and
would then recite long passages from the work of Lobo. He was wont to
say that he was the only one in Seville, at the present day, acquainted
with the language of the Aficion; for though there were many pretenders,
their knowledge was confined to a few words.
From the recitation of this individual, we wrote down the Brijindope, or
Deluge, and the poem on the plague which broke out in Seville in the year
1800. These and some songs of less consequence, constitute the poetical
part of the compilation in question; the rest, which is in prose,
consisting chiefly of translations from the Spanish, of proverbs and
religious pieces.
BRIJINDOPE.—THE DELUGE {304}
A POEM: IN TWO PARTS
PART THE FIRST
I with fear and terror quake,
Whilst the pen to write I take;
I will utter many a pray’r
To the heaven’s Regent fair,
That she deign to succour me,
And I’ll humbly bend my knee;
For but poorly do I know
With my subject on to go;
Therefore is my wisest plan
Not to trust in strength of man.
I my heavy sins bewail,
Whilst I view the wo and wail
Handed down so solemnly
In the book of times gone by.
Onward, onward, now I’ll move
In the name of Christ above,
And his Mother true and dear,
She who loves the wretch to cheer.
All I know, and all I’ve heard
I will state—how God appear’d
And to Noah thus did cry:
Weary with the world am I;
Let an ark by thee be built,
For the world is lost in guilt;
And when thou hast built it well,
Loud proclaim what now I tell:
Straight repent ye, for your Lord
In his hand doth hold a sword.
And good Noah thus did call:
Straight repent ye one and all,
For the world with grief I see
Lost in vileness utterly.
God’s own mandate I but do,
He hath sent me unto you.
Laugh’d the world to bitter scorn,
I his cruel sufferings mourn;
Brawny youths with furious air
Drag the Patriarch by the hair;
Lewdness governs every one:
Leaves her convent now the nun,
And the monk abroad I see
Practising iniquity.
Now I’ll tell how God, intent
To avenge, a vapour sent,
With full many a dreadful sign—
Mighty, mighty fear is mine:
As I hear the thunders roll,
Seems to die my very soul;
As I see the world o’erspread
All with darkness thick and dread;
I the pen can scarcely ply
For the tears which dim my eye,
And o’ercome with grievous wo,
Fear the task I must forego
I have purposed to perform.—
Hark, I hear upon the storm
Thousand, thousand devils fly,
Who with awful howlings cry:
Now’s the time and now’s the hour,
We have licence, we have power
To obtain a glorious prey.—
I with horror turn away;
Tumbles house and tumbles wall;
Thousands lose their lives and all,
Voiding curses, screams and groans,
For the beams, the bricks and stones
Bruise and bury all below—
Nor is that the worst, I trow,
For the clouds begin to pour
Floods of water more and more,
Down upon the world with might,
Never pausing day or night.
Now in terrible distress
All to God their cries address,
And his Mother dear adore,—
But the time of grace is o’er,
For the Almighty in the sky
Holds his hand upraised on high.
Now’s the time of madden’d rout,
Hideous cry, despairing shout;
Whither, whither shall they fly?
For the danger threat’ningly
Draweth near on every side,
And the earth, that’s opening wide,
Swallows thousands in its womb,
Who would ‘scape the dreadful doom.
Of dear hope exists no gleam,
Still the water down doth stream;
Ne’er so little a creeping thing
But from out its hold doth spring:
See the mouse, and see its mate
Scour along, nor stop, nor wait;
See the serpent and the snake
For the nearest highlands make;
The tarantula I view,
Emmet small and cricket too,
All unknowing where to fly,
In the stifling waters die.
See the goat and bleating sheep,
See the bull with bellowings deep.
And the rat with squealings shrill,
They have mounted on the hill:
See the stag, and see the doe,
How together fond they go;
Lion, tiger-beast, and pard,
To escape are striving hard:
Followed by her little ones,
See the hare how swift she runs:
Asses, he and she, a pair.
Mute and mule with bray and blare,
And the rabbit and the fox,
Hurry over stones and rocks,
With the grunting hog and horse,
Till at last they stop their course—
On the summit of the hill
All assembled stand they still;
In the second part I’ll tell
Unto them what there befell.
PART THE SECOND
When I last did bid farewell,
I proposed the world to tell,
Higher as the Deluge flow’d,
How the frog and how the toad,
With the lizard and the eft,
All their holes and coverts left,
And assembled on the height;
Soon I ween appeared in sight
All that’s wings beneath the sky,
Bat and swallow, wasp and fly,
Gnat and sparrow, and behind
Comes the crow of carrion kind;
Dove and pigeon are descried,
And the raven fiery-eyed,
With the beetle and the crane
Flying on the hurricane:
See they find no resting-place,
For the world’s terrestrial space
Is with water cover’d o’er,
Soon they sink to rise no more:
‘To our father let us flee!’
Straight the ark-ship openeth he,
And to everything that lives
Kindly he admission gives.
Of all kinds a single pair,
And the members safely there
Of his house he doth embark,
Then at once he shuts the ark;
Everything therein has pass’d,
There he keeps them safe and fast.
O’er the mountain’s topmost peak
Now the raging waters break.
Till full twenty days are o’er,
‘Midst the elemental roar,
Up and down the ark forlorn,
Like some evil thing is borne:
O what grief it is to see
Swimming on the enormous sea
Human corses pale and white,
More, alas! than I can write:
O what grief, what grief profound,
But to think the world is drown’d:
True a scanty few are left,
All are not of life bereft,
So that, when the Lord ordain,
They may procreate again,
In a world entirely new,
Better people and more true,
To their Maker who shall bow;
And I humbly beg you now,
Ye in modern times who wend,
That your lives ye do amend;
For no wat’ry punishment,
But a heavier shall be sent;
For the blessed saints pretend
That the latter world shall end
To tremendous fire a prey,
And to ashes sink away.
To the Ark I now go back,
Which pursues its dreary track,
Lost and ‘wilder’d till the Lord
In his mercy rest accord.
Early of a morning tide
They unclosed a window wide,
Heaven’s beacon to descry,
And a gentle dove let fly,
Of the world to seek some trace,
And in two short hours’ space
It returns with eyes that glow,
In its beak an olive bough.
With a loud and mighty sound,
They exclaim: ‘The world we’ve found.’
To a mountain nigh they drew,
And when there themselves they view,
Bound they swiftly on the shore,
And their fervent thanks outpour,
Lowly kneeling to their God;
Then their way a couple trod,
Man and woman, hand in hand,
Bent to populate the land,
To the Moorish region fair—
And another two repair
To the country of the Gaul;
In this manner wend they all,
And the seeds of nations lay.
I beseech ye’ll credence pay,
For our father, high and sage,
Wrote the tale in sacred page,
As a record to the world,
Record sad of vengeance hurl’d.
I, a low and humble wight,
Beg permission now to write
Unto all that in our land
Tongue Egyptian understand.
May our Virgin Mother mild
Grant to me, her erring child,
Plenteous grace in every way,
And success. Amen I say.
THE PESTILENCE
I’m resolved now to tell
In the speech of Gypsy-land
All the horror that befell
In this city huge and grand.
In the eighteenth hundred year
In the midst of summertide,
God, with man dissatisfied,
His right hand on high did rear,
With a rigour most severe;
Whence we well might understand
He would strict account demand
Of our lives and actions here.
The dread event to render clear
Now the pen I take in hand.
At the dread event aghast,
Straight the world reform’d its course;
Yet is sin in greater force,
Now the punishment is past;
For the thought of God is cast
All and utterly aside,
As if death itself had died.
Therefore to the present race
These memorial lines I trace
In old Egypt’s tongue of pride.
As the streets you wander’d through
How you quail’d with fear and dread,
Heaps of dying and of dead
At the leeches’ door to view.
To the tavern O how few
To regale on wine repair;
All a sickly aspect wear.
Say what heart such sights could brook—
Wail and woe where’er you look—
Wail and woe and ghastly care.
Plying fast their rosaries,
See the people pace the street,
And for pardon God entreat
Long and loud with streaming eyes.
And the carts of various size,
Piled with corses, high in air,
To the plain their burden bear.
O what grief it is to me
Not a friar or priest to see
In this city huge and fair.
ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE GITÁNOS
‘I am not very willing that any language should be totally
extinguished; the similitude and derivation of languages afford the
most indubitable proof of the traduction of nations, and the
genealogy of mankind; they add often physical certainty to historical
evidence of ancient migrations, and of the revolutions of ages which
left no written monuments behind them.’—JOHNSON.
THE Gypsy dialect of Spain is at present very much shattered and broken,
being rather the fragments of the language which the Gypsies brought with
them from the remote regions of the East than the language itself: it
enables, however, in its actual state, the Gitános to hold conversation
amongst themselves, the import of which is quite dark and mysterious to
those who are not of their race, or by some means have become acquainted
with their vocabulary. The relics of this tongue, singularly curious in
themselves, must be ever particularly interesting to the philological
antiquarian, inasmuch as they enable him to arrive at a satisfactory
conclusion respecting the origin of the Gypsy race. During the later
part of the last century, the curiosity of some learned individuals,
particularly Grellmann, Richardson, and Marsden, induced them to collect
many words of the Romanian language, as spoken in Germany, Hungary, and
England, which, upon analysing, they discovered to be in general either
pure Sanscrit or Hindustani words, or modifications thereof; these
investigations have been continued to the present time by men of equal
curiosity and no less erudition, the result of which has been the
establishment of the fact, that the Gypsies of those countries are the
descendants of a tribe of Hindus who for some particular reason had
abandoned their native country. In England, of late, the Gypsies have
excited particular attention; but a desire far more noble and laudable
than mere antiquarian curiosity has given rise to it, namely, the desire
of propagating the glory of Christ amongst those who know Him not, and of
saving souls from the jaws of the infernal wolf. It is, however, with
the Gypsies of Spain, and not with those of England and other countries,
that we are now occupied, and we shall merely mention the latter so far
as they may serve to elucidate the case of the Gitános, their brethren by
blood and language. Spain for many centuries has been the country of
error; she has mistaken stern and savage tyranny for rational government;
base, low, and grovelling superstition for clear, bright, and
soul-ennobling religion; sordid cheating she has considered as the path
to riches; vexatious persecution as the path to power; and the
consequence has been, that she is now poor and powerless, a pagan amongst
the pagans, with a dozen kings, and with none. Can we be surprised,
therefore, that, mistaken in policy, religion, and moral conduct, she
should have fallen into error on points so naturally dark and mysterious
as the history and origin of those remarkable people whom for the last
four hundred years she has supported under the name of Gitános? The idea
entertained at the present day in Spain respecting this race is, that
they are the descendants of the Moriscos who remained in Spain, wandering
about amongst the mountains and wildernesses, after the expulsion of the
great body of the nation from the country in the time of Philip the
Third, and that they form a distinct body, entirely unconnected with the
wandering tribes known in other countries by the names of Bohemians,
Gypsies, etc. This, like all unfounded opinions, of course originated in
ignorance, which is always ready to have recourse to conjecture and
guesswork, in preference to travelling through the long, mountainous, and
stony road of patient investigation; it is, however, an error far more
absurd and more destitute of tenable grounds than the ancient belief that
the Gitános were Egyptians, which they themselves have always professed
to be, and which the original written documents which they brought with
them on their first arrival in Western Europe, and which bore the
signature of the king of Bohemia, expressly stated them to be. The only
clue to arrive at any certainty respecting their origin, is the language
which they still speak amongst themselves; but before we can avail
ourselves of the evidence of this language, it will be necessary to make
a few remarks respecting the principal languages and dialects of that
immense tract of country, peopled by at least eighty millions of human
beings, generally known by the name of Hindustan, two Persian words
tantamount to the land of Ind, or, the land watered by the river Indus.
The most celebrated of these languages is the Sanskrida, or, as it is
known in Europe, the Sanscrit, which is the language of religion of all
those nations amongst whom the faith of Brahma has been adopted; but
though the language of religion, by which we mean the tongue in which the
religious books of the Brahmanic sect were originally written and are
still preserved, it has long since ceased to be a spoken language;
indeed, history is silent as to any period when it was a language in
common use amongst any of the various tribes of the Hindus; its
knowledge, as far as reading and writing it went, having been entirely
confined to the priests of Brahma, or Brahmans, until within the last
half-century, when the British, having subjugated the whole of Hindustan,
caused it to be openly taught in the colleges which they established for
the instruction of their youth in the languages of the country. Though
sufficiently difficult to acquire, principally on account of its
prodigious richness in synonyms, it is no longer a sealed language,—its
laws, structure, and vocabulary being sufficiently well known by means of
numerous elementary works, adapted to facilitate its study. It has been
considered by famous philologists as the mother not only of all the
languages of Asia, but of all others in the world. So wild and
preposterous an idea, however, only serves to prove that a devotion to
philology, whose principal object should be the expansion of the mind by
the various treasures of learning and wisdom which it can unlock,
sometimes only tends to its bewilderment, by causing it to embrace
shadows for reality. The most that can be allowed, in reason, to the
Sanscrit is that it is the mother of a certain class or family of
languages, for example, those spoken in Hindustan, with which most of the
European, whether of the Sclavonian, Gothic, or Celtic stock, have some
connection. True it is that in this case we know not how to dispose of
the ancient Zend, the mother of the modern Persian, the language in which
were written those writings generally attributed to Zerduscht, or
Zoroaster, whose affinity to the said tongues is as easily established as
that of the Sanscrit, and which, in respect to antiquity, may well
dispute the palm with its Indian rival. Avoiding, however, the
discussion of this point, we shall content ourselves with observing, that
closely connected with the Sanscrit, if not derived from it, are the
Bengáli, the high Hindustáni, or grand popular language of Hindustan,
generally used by the learned in their intercourse and writings, the
languages of Multan, Guzerat, and other provinces, without mentioning the
mixed dialect called Mongolian Hindustáni, a corrupt jargon of Persian,
Turkish, Arabic, and Hindu words, first used by the Mongols, after the
conquest, in their intercourse with the natives. Many of the principal
languages of Asia are totally unconnected with the Sanscrit, both in
words and grammatical structure; these are mostly of the great Tartar
family, at the head of which there is good reason for placing the Chinese
and Tibetian.
Bearing the same analogy to the Sanscrit tongue as the Indian dialects
specified above, we find the Rommany, or speech of the Roma, or Zincali,
as they style themselves, known in England and Spain as Gypsies and
Gitános. This speech, wherever it is spoken, is, in all principal
points, one and the same, though more or less corrupted by foreign words,
picked up in the various countries to which those who use it have
penetrated. One remarkable feature must not be passed over without
notice, namely, the very considerable number of Sclavonic words, which
are to be found embedded within it, whether it be spoken in Spain or
Germany, in England or Italy; from which circumstance we are led to the
conclusion, that these people, in their way from the East, travelled in
one large compact body, and that their route lay through some region
where the Sclavonian language, or a dialect thereof, was spoken. This
region I have no hesitation in asserting to have been Bulgaria, where
they probably tarried for a considerable period, as nomad herdsmen, and
where numbers of them are still to be found at the present day. Besides
the many Sclavonian words in the Gypsy tongue, another curious feature
attracts the attention of the philologist—an equal or still greater
quantity of terms from the modern Greek; indeed, we have full warranty
for assuming that at one period the Spanish section, if not the rest of
the Gypsy nation, understood the Greek language well, and that, besides
their own Indian dialect, they occasionally used it for considerably
upwards of a century subsequent to their arrival, as amongst the Gitános
there were individuals to whom it was intelligible so late as the year
1540.
Where this knowledge was obtained it is difficult to say,—perhaps in
Bulgaria, where two-thirds of the population profess the Greek religion,
or rather in Romania, where the Romaic is generally understood; that they
_did_ understand the Romaic in 1540, we gather from a very remarkable
work, called _El Estudioso Cortesáno_, written by Lorenzo Palmiréno: this
learned and highly extraordinary individual was by birth a Valencian, and
died about 1580; he was professor at various universities—of rhetoric at
Valencia, of Greek at Zaragossa, where he gave lectures, in which he
explained the verses of Homer; he was a proficient in Greek, ancient and
modern, and it should be observed that, in the passage which we are about
to cite, he means himself by the learned individual who held conversation
with the Gitános. {321} _El Estudioso Cortesáno_ was reprinted at Alcala
in 1587, from which edition we now copy.
‘Who are the Gitános? I answer; these vile people first began to show
themselves in Germany, in the year 1417, where they call them Tartars or
Gentiles; in Italy they are termed Ciani. They pretend that they come
from Lower Egypt, and that they wander about as a penance, and to prove
this, they show letters from the king of Poland. They lie, however, for
they do not lead the life of penitents, but of dogs and thieves. A
learned person, in the year 1540, prevailed with them, by dint of much
persuasion, to show him the king’s letter, and he gathered from it that
the time of their penance was already expired; he spoke to them in the
Egyptian tongue; they said, however, as it was a long time since their
departure from Egypt, they did not understand it; he then spoke to them
in the vulgar Greek, such as is used at present in the Morea and
Archipelago; _some understood it_, others did not; so that as all did not
understand it, we may conclude that the language which they use is a
feigned one, {67} got up by thieves for the purpose of concealing their
robberies, like the jargon of blind beggars.’
Still more abundant, however, than the mixture of Greek, still more
abundant than the mixture of Sclavonian, is the alloy in the Gypsy
language, wherever spoken, of modern Persian words, which circumstance
will compel us to offer a few remarks on the share which the Persian has
had in the formation of the dialects of India, as at present spoken.