AT ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, APRIL 29, 1903

_Cardinal Gibbons, Ladies and Gentlemen_:

It is indeed a pleasure to be received here as a guest of the first

and oldest university founded in our country west of the Mississippi

River in the Louisiana Purchase. I know your work. I have myself been

much in the West, and I have come across the traces of your work, both

among the communities of our own people and among the Indian tribes.

I thank you personally for your kind allusions to me, and would hold

myself recreant to the principles upon which this government was

founded did I not strive as Chief Executive to do fair and equal

justice to all men without regard to the way in which any man chooses

to worship his Maker.

AT THE DEDICATION CEREMONIES OF THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION, ST.

LOUIS, APRIL 30, 1903

_Mr. President, Ladies, and Gentlemen_:

At the outset of my address let me recall to the minds of my

hearers that the soil upon which we stand, before it was ours, was

successively the possession of two mighty empires, Spain and France,

whose sons made a deathless record of heroism in the early annals

of the New World. No history of the Western country can be written

without paying heed to the wonderful part played therein in the early

days by the soldiers, missionaries, explorers, and traders, who did

their work for the honor of the proud banners of France and Castile.

While the settlers of English-speaking stock, and those of Dutch,

German, and Scandinavian origin who were associated with them, were

still clinging close to the Eastern seaboard, the pioneers of Spain

and of France had penetrated deep into the hitherto unknown wilderness

of the West, had wandered far and wide within the boundaries of what

is now our mighty country. The very cities themselves—St. Louis, New

Orleans, Santa Fe—bear witness by their titles to the nationalities

of their founders. It was not until the Revolution had begun that the

English-speaking settlers pushed west across the Alleghanies, and not

until a century ago that they entered in to possess the land upon

which we now stand.

We have met here to-day to commemorate the hundredth anniversary of

the event which more than any other, after the foundation of the

Government and always excepting its preservation, determined the

character of our national life—determined that we should be a great

expanding Nation instead of relatively a small and stationary one.

Of course it was not with the Louisiana Purchase that our career of

expansion began. In the middle of the Revolutionary War the Illinois

region, including the present States of Illinois and Indiana, was

added to our domain by force of arms, as a sequel to the adventurous

expedition of George Rogers Clark and his frontier riflemen. Later

the treaties of Jay and Pinckney materially extended our real

boundaries to the West. But none of these events was of so striking

a character as to fix the popular imagination. The old thirteen

colonies had always claimed that their rights stretched westward to

the Mississippi, and vague and unreal though these claims were until

made good by conquest, settlement, and diplomacy, they still served to

give the impression that the earliest westward movements of our people

were little more than the filling in of already existing national

boundaries.

But there could be no illusion about the acquisition of the vast

territory beyond the Mississippi, stretching westward to the Pacific,

which in that day was known as Louisiana. This immense region

was admittedly the territory of a foreign power, of a European

kingdom. None of our people had ever laid claim to a foot of it.

Its acquisition could in no sense be treated as rounding out any

existing claims. When we acquired it we made evident once for all

that consciously and of set purpose we had embarked on a career

of expansion, that we had taken our place among those daring and

hardy nations who risk much with the hope and desire of winning high

position among the great powers of the earth. As is so often the case

in nature, the law of development of a living organism showed itself

in its actual workings to be wiser than the wisdom of the wisest.

This work of expansion was by far the greatest work of our people

during the years that intervened between the adoption of the

Constitution and the outbreak of the Civil War. There were other

questions of real moment and importance, and there were many which

at the time seemed such to those engaged in answering them; but the

greatest feat of our forefathers of those generations was the deed of

the men who, with pack train or wagon train, on horseback, on foot, or

by boat, pushed the frontier ever westward across the continent.

Never before had the world seen the kind of national expansion which

gave our people all that part of the American continent lying west

of the thirteen original States; the greatest landmark in which was

the Louisiana Purchase. Our triumph in this process of expansion was

indissolubly bound up with the success of our peculiar kind of federal

government; and this success has been so complete that because of its

very completeness we now sometimes fail to appreciate not only the

all-importance but the tremendous difficulty of the problem with which

our Nation was originally faced.

When our forefathers joined to call into being this Nation, they

undertook a task for which there was but little encouraging precedent.

The development of civilization from the earliest period seemed to

show the truth of two propositions: In the first place, it had always

proved exceedingly difficult to secure both freedom and strength

in any government; and in the second place, it had always proved

wellnigh impossible for a nation to expand without either breaking

up or becoming a centralized tyranny. With the success of our effort

to combine a strong and efficient national union, able to put down

disorder at home and to maintain our honor and interest abroad, I have

not now to deal. This success was signal and all-important, but it was

by no means unprecedented in the same sense that our type of expansion

was unprecedented. The history of Rome and of Greece illustrates very

well the two types of expansion which had taken place in ancient time

and which had been universally accepted as the only possible types up

to the period when as a Nation we ourselves began to take possession

of this continent. The Grecian States performed remarkable feats of

colonization, but each colony as soon as created became entirely

independent of the mother State, and in after years was almost as

apt to prove its enemy as its friend. Local self-government, local

independence, was secured, but only by the absolute sacrifice of

anything resembling national unity. In consequence, the Greek world,

for all its wonderful brilliancy and the extraordinary artistic,

literary, and philosophical development which has made all mankind its

debtors for the ages, was yet wholly unable to withstand a formidable

foreign foe, save spasmodically. As soon as powerful, permanent

empires arose on its outskirts, the Greek states in the neighborhood

of such empires fell under their sway. National power and greatness

were completely sacrificed to local liberty.

With Rome the exact opposite occurred. The imperial city rose to

absolute dominion over all the peoples of Italy and then expanded

her rule over the entire civilized world by a process which kept

the nation strong and united, but gave no room whatever for local

liberty and self-government. All other cities and countries were

subject to Rome. In consequence this great and masterful race of

warriors, rulers, road-builders, and administrators stamped their

indelible impress upon all the after life of our race, and yet let an

over-centralization eat out the vitals of their empire until it became

an empty shell; so that when the barbarians came they destroyed only

what had already become worthless to the world.

The underlying viciousness of each type of expansion was plain enough

and the remedy now seems simple enough. But when the fathers of the

Republic first formulated the Constitution under which we live this

remedy was untried and no one could foretell how it would work. They

themselves began the experiment almost immediately by adding new

States to the original thirteen. Excellent people in the East viewed

this initial expansion of the country with great alarm. Exactly as

during the colonial period many good people in the mother-country

thought it highly important that settlers should be kept out of the

Ohio Valley in the interest of the fur companies, so after we had

become a Nation many good people on the Atlantic Coast felt grave

apprehension lest they might somehow be hurt by the westward growth of

the Nation. These good people shook their heads over the formation of

States in the fertile Ohio Valley which now forms part of the heart

of our Nation; and they declared that the destruction of the Republic

had been accomplished when through the Louisiana Purchase we acquired

nearly half of what is now that same Republic’s present territory. Nor

was their feeling unnatural. Only the adventurous and the far-seeing

can be expected heartily to welcome the process of expansion, for the

nation that expands is a nation which is entering upon a great career,

and with greatness there must of necessity come perils which daunt all

save the most stout-hearted.

We expanded by carving the wilderness into Territories and out of

these Territories building new States when once they had received

as permanent settlers a sufficient number of our own people. Being

a practical Nation we have never tried to force on any section of

our new territory an unsuitable form of government merely because

it was suitable for another section under different conditions. Of

the territory covered by the Louisiana Purchase a portion was given

Statehood within a few years. Another portion has not been admitted

to Statehood, although a century has elapsed—although doubtless it

soon will be. In each case we showed the practical governmental

genius of our race by devising methods suitable to meet the actual

existing needs; not by insisting upon the application of some abstract

shibboleth to all our new possessions alike, no matter how incongruous

this application might sometimes be.

Over by far the major part of the territory, however, our people

spread in such numbers during the course of the nineteenth century

that we were able to build up State after State, each with exactly the

same complete local independence in all matters affecting purely its

own domestic interests as in any of the original thirteen States—each

owing the same absolute fealty to the Union of all the States which

each of the original thirteen States also owes—and finally each having

the same proportional right to its share in shaping and directing the

common policy of the Union which is possessed by any other State,

whether of the original thirteen or not.

This process now seems to us part of the natural order of things, but

it was wholly unknown until our own people devised it. It seems to us

a mere matter of course, a matter of elementary right and justice,

that in the deliberations of the national representative bodies the

representatives of a State which came into the Union but yesterday

stand on a footing of exact and entire equality with those of the

Commonwealths whose sons once signed the Declaration of Independence.

But this way of looking at the matter is purely modern, and in its

origin purely American. When Washington during his Presidency saw new

States come into the Union on a footing of complete equality with the

old, every European nation which had colonies still administered them

as dependencies, and every other mother-country treated the colonist

not as a self-governing equal but as a subject.

The process which we began has since been followed by all the great

peoples who were capable both of expansion and self-government, and

now the world accepts it as the natural process, as the rule; but

a century and a quarter ago it was not merely exceptional; it was

unknown.

This, then, is the great historical significance of the movement of

continental expansion in which the Louisiana Purchase was the most

striking single achievement. It stands out in marked relief even among

the feats of a nation of pioneers, a nation whose people have from

the beginning been picked out by process of natural selection from

among the most enterprising individuals of the nations of western

Europe. The acquisition of the territory is a credit to the broad

and far-sighted statesmanship of the great statesmen to whom it was

immediately due, and above all to the aggressive and the masterful

character of the hardy pioneer folk to whose restless energy these

statesmen gave expression and direction, whom they followed rather

than led. The history of the land comprised within the limits of the

Purchase is the epitome of the entire history of our people. Within

these limits we have gradually built up State after State until now

they many times surpass in wealth, in population, and in many-sided

development, the original thirteen States as they were when their

delegates met in the Continental Congress. The people of these States

have shown themselves mighty in war with their fellow-man, and mighty

in strength to tame the rugged wilderness. They could not thus have

conquered the forest and the prairie, the mountain and the desert,

had they not possessed the great fighting virtues, the qualities

which enable a people to overcome the forces of hostile men and

hostile nature. On the other hand, they could not have used aright

their conquest had they not in addition possessed the qualities of

self-mastery and self-restraint, the power of acting in combination

with their fellows, the power of yielding obedience to the law and

of building up an orderly civilization. Courage and hardihood are

indispensable virtues in a people; but the people which possesses no

others can never rise high in the scale either of power or of culture.

Great peoples must have in addition the governmental capacity which

comes only when individuals fully recognize their duties to one

another and to the whole body politic, and are able to join together

in feats of constructive statesmanship and of honest and effective

administration.

The old pioneer days are gone, with their roughness and their

hardship, their incredible toil and their wild half-savage romance.

But the need for the pioneer virtues remains the same as ever. The

peculiar frontier conditions have vanished; but the manliness and

stalwart hardihood of the frontiersmen can be given even freer scope

under the conditions surrounding the complex industrialism of the

present day. In this great region acquired for our people under the

Presidency of Jefferson, this region stretching from the Gulf to the

Canadian border, from the Mississippi to the Rockies, the material and

social progress has been so vast that alike for weal and for woe its

people now share the opportunities and bear the burdens common to the

entire civilized world. The problems before us are fundamentally the

same east and west of the Mississippi, in the new States and in the

old, and exactly the same qualities are required for their successful

solution.

We meet here to-day to commemorate a great event, an event which marks

an era in statesmanship no less than in pioneering. It is fitting that

we should pay our homage in words; but we must in honor make our words

good by deeds. We have every right to take a just pride in the great

deeds of our forefathers; but we show ourselves unworthy to be their

descendants if we make what they did an excuse for our lying supine

instead of an incentive to the effort to show ourselves by our acts

worthy of them. In the administration of city, State, and Nation,

in the management of our home life and the conduct of our business

and social relations, we are bound to show certain high and fine

qualities of character under penalty of seeing the whole heart of our

civilization eaten out while the body still lives.

We justly pride ourselves on our marvelous material prosperity, and

such prosperity must exist in order to establish a foundation upon

which a higher life can be built; but unless we do in very fact build

this higher life thereon, the material prosperity itself will go for

but very little. Now, in 1903, in the altered conditions, we must meet

the changed and changing problems with the spirit shown by the men who

in 1803 and in the subsequent years gained, explored, conquered, and

settled this vast territory, then a desert, now filled with thriving

and populous States.

The old days were great because the men who lived in them had mighty

qualities; and we must make the new days great by showing these same

qualities. We must insist upon courage and resolution, upon hardihood,

tenacity, and fertility in resource; we must insist upon the strong,

virile virtues; and we must insist no less upon the virtues of

self-restraint, self-mastery, regard for the rights of others; we must

show our abhorrence of cruelty, brutality, and corruption, in public

and in private life alike. If we come short in any of these qualities

we shall measurably fail; and if, as I believe we surely shall, we

develop these qualities in the future to an even greater degree than

in the past, then in the century now beginning we shall make of this

Republic the freest and most orderly, the most just and most mighty,

nation which has ever come forth from the womb of time.

Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 1 (of 7) · 第 86 / 98 题