FROM ADDRESS AT QUINCY, ILL., APRIL 29, 1903

_Mr. Chairman and my Fellow-Citizens_:

There is one matter which I think presses for national legislative

attention—the matter of the currency. From your sister State of Iowa

I have a Secretary of the Treasury, who, as he showed last fall,

can be counted on to act with courage and with wisdom whenever the

need arises, and to use fearlessly and coolly whatever the law now

allows him to use. Our currency laws have been recently improved

by specific declarations intended to secure permanency of values;

but this does not imply that these laws may not be further improved

and strengthened. It is wellnigh universally admitted, certainly in

any business community such as this, that our currency system is

wanting in elasticity; that is, the volume does not respond to the

varying needs of the country as a whole, nor to the varying needs of

the different localities as well as of different times. Our people

scarcely need to be reminded that grain-raising communities require

a larger volume of currency at harvest time than during the summer

months; and the same principle in greater or less extent applies to

every community. Our currency laws need such modification as will

ensure definitely the parity of every dollar coined or issued by the

government, and such expansion or contraction of the currency as will

promptly and automatically respond to the varying needs of commerce.

Permanent increase would be dangerous, permanent contraction ruinous,

but the needed elasticity must be brought about by provisions which

will permit both contraction and expansion as the varying needs of the

several communities and business interests at different times and in

different localities require.

AT ODEON HALL, ST. LOUIS, MO., BEFORE THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL

GOOD ROADS CONVENTION, APRIL 29, 1903

_Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen_:

When we wish to use descriptive terms fit to characterize great

empires and the men who made those empires great, invariably one of

the terms used is to signify that that empire built good roads. When

we speak of the Romans, we speak of them as rulers, as conquerors, as

administrators, as road builders. There were empires that rose over

night and fell over night, empires whose influence was absolutely

evanescent, which have passed away without leaving a trace of their

former existence; but wherever the Roman established his rule the

traces of that rule remain deep to-day, stamped on the language and

customs of the people, or stamped in tangible form upon the soil

itself. And so passing through Britain fifteen centuries and over

after the dominion of Rome passed away, the Roman roads as features

still remain; going through Italy, where power after power has

risen, and flourished, and vanished since the days when the temporal

dominion of the Roman emperors transferred its seat from Rome to

Byzantium—going through Italy after the Lombard, the Goth, the

Byzantine, and all the people of the Middle Ages that have ruled that

country—it is the imperishable Roman road that reappears.

The faculty, the art, the habit of road building marks in a nation

those solid, stable qualities which tell for permanent greatness.

Merely from the standpoint of historic analogy we should have a right

to ask that this people which has tamed a continent, which has built

up a country with a continent for its base, which boasts itself,

with truth, as the mightiest republic that the world has ever seen,

which I firmly believe will in the century now opening rise to a

position of headship and leadership such as no other nation has ever

yet attained—merely from historic analogy, I say, we should have

a right to demand that such a nation build good roads. Much more

have we the right to demand it from the practical standpoint. The

great difference between the semi-barbarism of the Middle Ages and

the civilization which succeeded it was the difference between poor

and good means of communication. And we to whom space is less of an

obstacle than ever it was in the history of any other nation, we who

have spanned a continent, who have thrust our border westward in the

course of a century and a quarter until it has gone from the Atlantic

to the Alleghanies, from the Alleghanies down into the valley of the

Mississippi, across the great plains, over the Rockies to where the

Golden Gate lets through the long heaving waters of the Pacific, and

finally to Alaska, to the Arctic regions, to the tropic islands of the

sea—we who take so little account of mere space must see to it that

the best means of nullifying the existence of space are at our command.

Of course, during the last century there has been an altogether

phenomenal growth of one kind of road wholly unknown to the people of

an earlier period—the iron road. The railroad is, of course, something

purely modern. A great many excellent people have proceeded upon

the assumption that somehow or other having good railways should be

a substitute for having good highways, good ordinary roads. A more

untenable position can not be imagined. What the railway does is to

develop the country; and of course its development implies that the

developed country will need more and better roads.

A few years ago it was a matter of humiliation that there should

be so little attention paid to our roads; that there should be a

willingness not merely to refrain from making good roads, but to let

the roads that were in existence become worse. I can not too heartily

congratulate our people upon the existence of a body such as this,

ramifying into every section of the country, having its connections

in every State of the country, and bent upon that eminently proper

work of making the conditions of life easier and better for the people

whom of all others we can least afford to see grow discontented with

their lot in life—the people who live in the country districts.

The extraordinary, the wholly unheard-of, rate of our industrial

development during the past seventy-five years, together with the

good sides has had some evil sides. It is a fine thing to see our

cities built up, but not at the expense of the country districts.

The healthy thing to see is the building up of both the country and

city go hand in hand. But we can not expect the ablest, the most

eager, the most ambitious young men to stay in the country, to stay

on the farm, unless they have certain advantages. If the farm life

is a life of isolation, a life in which it is a matter of great and

real difficulty for one man to communicate with his neighbor, you can

rest assured that there will be a tendency to leave it on the part

of those very people whom we should most wish to see stay in it. It

is a good thing to encourage in every way any tendency which will

tend to check an unhealthy flow from the country to the city. There

are several such tendencies in evidence at present. The growth of

electricity as a means of transportation tends to a certain degree

to exercise a centrifugal force to offset the centripetal force of

steam. Exactly as steam and electricity have tended to gather men in

masses, so now electricity, as applied to the purposes which steam

has so long claimed as exclusively its own, tends again to scatter

out the masses. The trolley lines that go out into the country are

doing a great deal to render it more possible to live in the country

and yet not to lose wholly the advantages of the town. The telephone

is not to be minimized as an instrument with a tendency in the same

direction; and rural free delivery is playing its part along the same

lines. But no one thing can do more to offset the tendency toward

an unhealthy growth from the country into the city than the making

and keeping of good roads. They are needed for the sake of their

effect upon the industrial conditions of the country districts; and

I am almost tempted to say they are needed for the sake of social

conditions in the country districts. If winter means to the average

farmer the existence of a long line of liquid morasses through which

he is to move his goods if bent on business, or to wade and swim if

bent on pleasure; if winter means that after an ordinary rain the

farmer boy or girl can not use his or her bicycle; if a little heavy

weather means a stoppage of all communication not only with industrial

centres but with the neighbors, you must expect that there will be

a great many young people of both sexes who will not find farm life

attractive. It is for this reason that I feel the work you are doing

is so pre-eminently one in the interest of the Nation as a whole. I

congratulate you upon the fact that you are doing it. In our American

life it would be hard to overestimate the amount of good that has

been accomplished by associations of individuals who have gathered

together to work for a common object which was to be of benefit to

the community as a whole; and among all the excellent objects for

which men and women combine to work to-day, there are few indeed which

have a better right to command the energies of those engaged in the

movement, and the hearty sympathy and support of those outside, than

this movement in which you are engaged.

Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 1 (of 7) · 第 85 / 98 题