AFTER-WAR MISTAKES

Had we acted wisely and expeditiously at the end of the war we might

even then have avoided the trouble that followed. But when Egyptian

ministers asked leave to come to London in December, 1918, we answered

that the time was not opportune for these discussions, and when the

Nationalist leaders proposed to send a delegation, we said that no good

purpose could be served by their coming to Europe. This heightened the

alarm, and the Nationalists retorted by raising their claims from

"complete autonomy" to "complete independence," and started a violent

agitation. The Government retaliated by deporting Zaghlul to Malta,

whereupon the country broke into rebellion. Lord Allenby now came upon

the scene, and, while suppressing the rebellion, released Zaghlul and

gave him and his delegation the permission to go to Europe which had

been refused in January. It was now decided to send out the Milner

Mission, but there was a further delay of seven months before it

started, and during all that time agitation continued.

When the Mission arrived it quickly discovered that there was no

possible "Constitution under the Protectorate" which would satisfy the

Egyptians, and that the sole alternatives were further suppression or

the discovery of some means of settlement which dispensed with the

Protectorate. The Mission unanimously came to the conclusion that though

the first was mechanically possible if the cost and discredit were

faced, the second was not only feasible but far preferable, and that the

right method was a treaty of Alliance between Great Britain and Egypt,

recognising Egypt as a sovereign State, but affording all necessary

guarantees for imperial interests. Working on those lines the Mission

gradually broke down the boycott proclaimed against them, convinced the

Egyptians of their goodwill, induced all parties of Egyptian

Nationalists to come to London, and there negotiated the basis of the

Treaty which was described in the Report. The main points were that

there must be a British force in the country--not an army of occupation,

but a force to guard Imperial communications--that there must be British

liaison officers for law and order and finance, that the control of

foreign policy must remain in the hands of Great Britain, and that the

Soudan settlement of 1898 must remain untouched, but that with these

exceptions the Government of Egypt should be in fact what it had always

been in theory: a Government of Egyptians by Egyptians.

Had the Government accepted this in December, 1920 (instead of in March,

1922), and instructed Lord Milner to go forward and draft a treaty on

this basis, it is extremely probable that a settlement would have been

reached in a few weeks; but Ministers, unhappily, were unable to make up

their minds, and there was a further delay of three months before the

Egyptian Prime Minister, Adli Pasha, was invited to negotiate with the

Foreign Office. By this time the Nationalist parties which the Mission

had succeeded in uniting on a common platform had fallen apart, and the

extremists once more started a violent agitation and upbraided the

moderates for tamely waiting on the British Government, which had

evidently meant to deceive them. The situation had, therefore, changed

again for the worse when Adli came to London in April, 1921, and it was

made worse still by what followed. The negotiations dragged over six

months, and finally broke down for reasons that have never been

explained, but the probability is that Egypt had now got entangled in

Coalition domestic politics, and that the "Die-Hards" claimed to have

their way in Egypt in return for their consent to the Irish settlement.

The door was now banged in the face of all schools of Egyptian

Nationalists, and Lord Allenby was instructed to send to the Sultan the

unhappy letter in which Egypt was peremptorily reminded that she was a

"part of the communications of the British Empire," and many other

things said which were specially calculated to wound Egyptian

susceptibilities.

The Egyptian Prime Minister resigned, and for the next five months Lord

Allenby endeavoured to govern the country by martial law without an

Egyptian Ministry. Then he came to London with the unanimous support of

British officials in Egypt to tell the Government that the situation was

impossible and a settlement imperative. The Government gave way and

British policy was again reversed, but three opportunities had now been

thrown away, and at the fourth time of asking the difficulties were

greatly increased. The Nationalists were now divided and the Moderates

in danger of being violently attacked if they accepted a moderate

solution. It was found necessary to deport Zaghlul Pasha and to put

several of his chief adherents on trial. Suspicions had been aroused by

the delays and vacillations of the British Government. A settlement by

treaty was now impossible, and Lord Allenby had to give unconditionally

the recognition of sovereignty which the Mission intended to be part of

the treaty, putting the Egyptians under an honourable pledge to respect

British rights and interests. In the circumstances there was nothing

else to do, but it is greatly to be desired that when the constitution

has been completed and the new Assembly convened, an effort should be

made to revert to the method of the treaty which particularly suited the

Egyptian character and would be regarded as a binding obligation by

Egyptians.

Essays in Liberalism Being the Lectures and Papers Which Were Delivered at the Liberal Summer School at Oxford, 1922 · 第 72 / 127 题