OF THE CESSPOOL SYSTEM OF LONDON.

A cesspool, or some equivalent contrivance, has long existed in

connexion with the structure of the better class of houses in the

metropolis, and there seems every reason to believe--though I am

assured, on good authority, that there is no public or official record

of the matter known to exist--that their use became more and more

general, as in the case of the sewers, after the rebuilding of the

City, consequent upon the great fire of 1666.

The older cesspools were of two kinds--“soil-tanks” and “bog-holes.”

“Soil-tanks” were the filth receptacles of the larger houses, and

sometimes works of solid masonry; they were almost every size and

depth, but always perhaps much deeper than the modern cesspools, which

present an average depth of 6 feet to 6-1/2 feet.

The “bog-hole” was, and is, a cavity dug into the earth, having less

masonry than the soil-tank, and sometimes no masonry at all, being in

like manner the receptacle for the wet refuse from the house.

The difference between these old contrivances and the present mode

is principally in the following respect: the soil-tank or bog-hole

formed a receptacle immediately under the privy (the floor of which has

usually to be removed for purposes of cleansing), whereas the refuse

is now more frequently carried into the modern cesspool by a system of

drainage. Sometimes the soil-tank was, when the nature of the situation

of the premises permitted, in some outer place, such as an obscure

part of the garden or court-yard; and perhaps two or more bog-holes

were drained into it, while often enough, by means of a grate or a

trap-door, any kind of refuse to be got rid of was thrown into it.

I am informed that the average contents of a bog-hole (such as now

exist) are a cubic yard of matter; some are round, some oblong, for

there is, or was, great variation.

Of the few remaining soil-tanks the varying sizes prevent any average

being computable.

What the old system of cesspoolage _was_ may be judged from the fact,

that until somewhere about 1830 no cesspool matter could, without an

indictable offence being committed, be drained into a sewer! _Now_,

no new house can be erected, but it is an indictable offence if the

cesspool (or rather water-closet) matter be drained anywhere else

than into the sewer! The law, at the period specified, required most

strangely, so that “the drains and sewers might not be choked,” that

cesspools should “be not only periodically emptied, but _made_ by

nightmen.”

The principal means of effecting the change from cesspoolage to

sewerage was the introduction of Bramah’s water-closets, patented in

1808, but not brought into general use for some twenty years or more

after that date. The houses of the rich, owing to the refuse being

drained away from the premises, improved both in wholesomeness and

agreeableness, and so the law was relaxed.

There are two kinds of cesspools, viz. _public_ and _private_.

The _public cesspools_ are those situated in courts, alleys, and

places, which, though often packed thickly with inhabitants, are not

horse-thoroughfares, or thoroughfares at all; and in such places one,

two, or more cesspools receive the refuse from all the houses. I do not

know that any official account of public cesspools has been published

as to their number, character, &c., but their number is insignificant

when compared with those connected with private houses. The public

cesspools are cleansed, and, where possible, filled up by order of the

Commissioners of Sewers, the cost being then defrayed out of the rate.

The _private cesspools_ are cleansed at the expense of the occupiers of

the houses.

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 346 / 558 题