The author then puts forth the following curious statement:--

“And now for the vermin destroyed by Messrs. Shaw and Sabin--34,000

yearly! Taken at the same calculation, with their three years’

progeny--can you believe it?--they would consume more food than the

whole population of the earth? Yes, if Omnipotence would raise up

29,573,600 more people, these rats would consume as much food as them

all! You may wonder, but I will prove it to you:--The population of

the earth, including men, women, and children, is estimated to be

970,000,000 souls; and the 17,000 rats in three years would produce

10,995,736,000: consequently, at ten rats per man, there would be

sufficient rats to eat as much food as all the people on the earth,

and leaving 1,295,736,000. So that if the human family were increased

to 1,099,573,600, instead of 970,000,000, there would be rats enough

to eat the food of them all! Now, sirs, is not this a most appalling

thing, to think that there are at the present time in the British

Empire thousands--nay, millions--of human beings in a state of utter

starvation, while rats are consuming that which would place them and

their families in a state of affluence and comfort? I ask this simple

question: Has not Parliament, ere now, been summoned upon matters of

far less importance to the empire? I think it has.”

The author then advocates the repeal of the “rat-tax,” that is, the

tax on what he calls the “true friend of man and remorseless destroyer

of rats,” the well-bred terrier dog. “Take the tax off rat-killing

dogs” he says, “and give a legality to rat-killing, and let there be in

each parish a man who will pay a reward per head for dead rats, which

are valuable for manure (as was done in the case of wolves in the old

days), and then rats would be extinguished for ever!” Uncle James seems

to be a perfect Malthus among rats. The over-population and over-rat

theories are about equal in reason.

[Illustration: THE RAT-CATCHERS OF THE SEWERS.

[_From a Daguerreotype by_ BEARD.]]

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 343 / 558 题