The expenditure, as returned under the general head, is--

For work £95,539 19 3

(This item includes the cost

of supervision and compensation

for damages.)

The cost of surveys has been 6,332 19 9

Management 16,430 9 2

Loans 10,442 10 2

Contingencies 2,749 1 1

-------------

Total payments 131,494 19 5

Balance in hand £3,355 11 3

As an instance of the mismanagement of the sewers work of the

metropolis, it is but right that the subjoined document should be

published.

I need not offer any comment on the following “Return to an Address of

the Honourable the House of Commons, dated 28th July, 1851,” except

that I was told early in January, on good authority, that the matter

was now worse than it was when reported as follows:--

“_Privy Gardens, Whitehall Yard, Scotland Yard, &c., Public Sewer._

“With reference to the two orders of the Commissioners of Her

Majesty’s Woods, &c., I have the honour to state that, since the 15th

of November (when I last sent in a memorandum), I have frequently

visited the several Crown buildings affected by the building of

the main public sewer for draining Westminster; viz., the Earl of

Malmsbury’s, the Exchequer Bill Office, the United Service Museum,

Lord Liverpool’s, Mr. Vertue’s, Mr. Alderman Thompson’s, and Messrs.

Dalgleish’s.

“All these buildings have been more or less damaged by the

construction of the sewer; the Exchequer Bill Office, the United

Service Museum, and Mr. Vertue’s, in a manner that, in my opinion, can

_never be effectually repaired_.

“At Lord Malmsbury’s, the party wall next to the Exchequer Bill Office

has _moved_, as shown by some cracks in the staircase; but for this

house it may not be necessary to require more to be done than stopping

and painting.

“At the Exchequer Bill Office, the old Gothic groins have been cracked

in several places, and several settlements have taken place in the

walls over and near to where the sewer passes under the building.

The shores are still standing against this building, but it would

now be better to remove them; the cracks in the groins and walls

_can never be repaired_ to render the building so substantial as it

was before. The cracks in the basement still from month to month

show a very slight movement; those in the staircase and roof also

appear to increase. As respects this building, I would submit to the

Commissioners of Woods that it _would not be advisable to permit

the surveyors of the Commissioners of Sewers to enter and make only

a surface repair of plaster and paint_; but I would suggest that a

careful survey be made by surveyors appointed respectively by the

Board of Woods and the Commissioners of Sewers, and that a thorough

repair of the building be made (so far as it is susceptible of

repair), under the Board of Woods; the Commissioners of Sewers paying

such proportion of the cost thereof as may fairly be deemed to have

been occasioned by their proceedings.

“At the United Service Museum, the settlements on the side next the

sewer appear to me very serious.

“The house occupied by Lord Liverpool, as also Mr. Vertue’s house, of

which his Lordship is Crown lessee, were both affected, the former to

some extent, but not seriously; of the latter, the west front sunk,

and pulled over the whole house with it; but as respects these two

houses the interference of the Board is, I believe, unnecessary, Mr.

Hardwicke (one of the Sewer Commissioners) having, as architect for

Lord Liverpool, caused both to be repaired.

“A like repair has also been made in the kitchen offices of Mr.

Alderman Thompson’s house, where alone any cracks appeared.

“At Messrs. Dalgleish and Taylor’s, very serious injury has been done

to both their buildings and their trade. The Commissioners of Sewers

have a steam-engine still at work on those premises, and have not yet

concluded their operations there. Some of the sheds which entirely

fell down they have rebuilt; and others, which appear in a very

defective if not dangerous state, it is understood they propose to

repair or rebuild; but as eventually Messrs. Dalgleish and Taylor will

have a very heavy claim against them for interference with business,

and as the extent of damage to the buildings which has been done, or

may hereafter arise, cannot at present be fully ascertained, it would

probably be advisable to postpone this part of the subject, giving

notice, however, to the Commissioners of Sewers that it must hereafter

come under consideration.

(Signed) “JAMES PENNETHORNE.

“10th May, 1851.”

“_Sewer, Whitehall Yard, &c._

“Under the order of the Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Woods, &c.,

of yesterday’s date, endorsed on a letter from Mr. Tonna, I have

inspected the United Service Institution in Whitehall Yard, and find

most of the cracks have moved.

“The movement, though slight, and not showing immediate danger, is

more than I had anticipated would occur within so short a period

when I reported on the 10th instant. It tends to confirm the opinion

therein given, and shows the necessity for immediate precaution, and

for a thorough repair.

(Signed) “JAMES PENNETHORNE.

“16th May, 1851.

{Commissioners of Her

“SEYMOUR, {Majesty’s Woods, Forests,

“CHARLES GORE, {Land Revenues,

{Works, and Buildings.

“Office of Woods, &c.

“5th August, 1851.”

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 326 / 558 题