OF THE HOUSE-DRAINAGE OF THE METROPOLIS AS CONNECTED WITH THE SEWERS.

Every house built or rebuilt since the passing of the Metropolitan

Sewers Act in 1848, must be drained, with an exception, which I shall

specify, into a sewer. The law, indeed, divested of its technicalities

is this: the owner of a newly-erected house must drain it to a sewer,

without the intervention of a cesspool, if there be a sewer within

100 feet of the site of the house; and, if necessary, in places but

partially built over, such owner must continue the sewer along the

premises, and make the necessary drain into it; all being done under

the approval of the proper officer under the Commissioners. If there

be, however, an established sewer, along the side, front, or back of

any house, a covered drain must be made into that at the cost of the

owner of the premises to be drained. “Where a sewer,” says the 46th

section of the Act, “shall already be made, and a drain only shall

be required, the party is to pay a contribution towards the original

expense of the sewer, if it shall have been made within thirty-five

years before the 4th of September, 1848, the contribution to be paid

to the builder of the sewer.”... “In cases where there shall be no

sewer into which a drain could be made, the party must make a covered

drain to lead into a cesspool or other place (not under a house) as

the Commissioners may direct. If the parties infringe this rule, the

Commissioners may do the work and throw the cost on them in the nature

of an improvement rate, or as charges for default, and levy the amount

by distress.”

I mention these circumstances more particularly to show the extent, and

the far-continued ramification, of the subterranean metropolis. I am

assured by one of the largest builders in the western district of the

capital that the new regulations (as to the dispensing with cesspools)

are readily complied with, as it is a recommendation which a house

agent, or any one letting new premises, is never slow to advance (“and

when it’s the truth,” he said, “they do it with a better grace”), that

there will be in the course of occupancy no annoyance and no expense

incurred in the clearing away of cesspoolage.

I shall at present describe only the house-drainage, which is connected

with the public sewerage. The old mode of draining a house separately

into the cesspool of the premises will, of course, be described under

the head of cesspoolage, and that old system is still very prevalent.

At the times of passing both general and local Acts concerning

buildings, town improvements and extensions, the erection of new

streets and the removal of old, much has been said and written

concerning better systems of ventilating, warming, and draining

dwelling-houses; but until after the first outbreak of cholera in

England, in 1832, little public attention was given to the great

drainage of all the sewers. However, on the passing of the Building and

Sanitary Acts generally, the authorities made many experiments, not so

much to improve the system of sewerage as of house-drainage, so as to

make the dwelling-houses more wholesome and sweet.

To effect this, the great object was the abolition of the cesspool

system, under which filth must accumulate, and where, from scamped

buildings or other causes, evaporation took place, the effects of the

system were found to be vile and offensive, and have been pronounced

miasmatic. Having just alluded to these matters, I proceed to describe

the modernly-adopted connection of house-drainage and street-sewerage.

Experiments, as I have said, were set on foot under the auspices of

public bodies, and the opinions of eminent engineers, architects,

and surveyors were also taken. Their opinions seem really to be

concentrated in the advocacy of _one_ remedy--improved house-drainage;

and they appear to have agreed that the system which is at present

adopted is, under the circumstances, the best that can be adopted.

I was told also by an eminent practical builder, perfectly unconnected

with any official or public body, and, indeed, often at issue with

surveyors, &c., that the new system was unquestionably a great

improvement in every respect, and that some years before its adoption

as at present he had abetted such a system, and had carried it into

effect when he could properly do so.

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 301 / 558 题