OF THE FIRES OF LONDON.

Connected with the subject of chimney sweeping is one which attracts

far less of the attention of the legislature and the public than its

importance would seem to demand: I mean the fires in the metropolis,

with their long train of calamities, such as the loss of life and

of property. These calamities, too, especially as regards the loss

of property, are almost all endured by the poor, the destruction of

whose furniture is often the destruction of their whole property, as

insurances are rarely effected by them; while the wealthier classes, in

the case of fires, are not exposed to the evils of houselessness, and

may be actually gainers by the conflagration, through the sum for which

the property was insured.

“The daily occurrence of fires in the metropolis,” say the Board

of Health, “their extent, the number of persons who perish by

them, the enormous loss of property they occasion, the prevalence

of incendiarism, the apparent apathy with which such calamities

are regarded, and the rapidity with which they are forgotten, will

hereafter be referred to as evidence of a very low social condition

and defective administrative organization. These fires, it was shown

nearly a century ago, when the subject of insurance was debated in

Parliament, were frequently caused from not having chimneys swept

in proper time.” I am informed that a chimney may be on fire for many

days, unknown to the inmates of the house, and finally break out in

the body of the building by its getting into contact with some beam or

wood-work. The recent burning of Limehouse Church was occasioned by the

soot collected in the flue taking fire, and becoming red hot, when it

ignited the wood-work in the roof. The flue, or pipe, was of iron.

From a return made by Mr. Braidwood of the houses and properties

destroyed in the metropolis in the three years ending in 1849

inclusive, it appears that the total number was 1111: of contents

destroyed (which, being generally insured separately, should be kept

distinct) there were 1013. The subjoined table gives the particulars as

to the proportion insured and uninsured:--

-------------+---------+----------+------

-- | Insured.|Uninsured.|Total.

-------------+---------+----------+------

Houses | 914 | 197 | 1111

Contents | 609 | 404 | 1013

-------------+---------+----------+------

| 1523 | 601 | 2124

-------------+---------+----------+------

“The proportion per cent. of the uninsured to the insured, would be--

--------+----+---------+----------+------

-- | | Insured.|Uninsured.|Total.

--------+----+---------+----------+------

| |Per Cent.| Per Cent.|

Houses |1111| 82·3 | 17·7 | 100

Contents|1013| 60·1 | 39·9 | 100

--------+----+---------+----------+------

|2124| 71·7 | 28·3 | 100

--------+----+---------+----------+------

The following table gives the total number of fires in the metropolis

during a series of years:

ABSTRACT OF CAUSES OF FIRE IN THE METROPOLIS, FROM 1833 to 1849,

INCLUSIVE.

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 285 / 558 题