Profit of employers, say 550,000

Add for sundries, as starch, &c. 50,000

----------

Total cost of washing of metropolis £2,780,000

Hence it would appear, that viewed either by the individual expense

of the great bulk of society, or else by the aggregate cost of the

materials and labour used in cleansing the clothes of the people

of London, the total sum annually expended in the washing of the

metropolis may be estimated at the outside at two millions and three

quarters sterling per annum, or about 1_l._ 3_s._ 4_d._ per head.

And yet, though the data for the calculation here given, as to the

cost and quantity of the principal materials used in cleansing the

clothes of London, are derived from the same Report as that in which

the expense of the metropolitan washing is estimated at 5,000,000_l._

per annum, the Board of Health do not hesitate in that document to

say that,--“Of the fairness of the estimate of the expense of washing

to the higher and middle classes, and to the great bulk of the

householders, and the better class of artizans, we entertain no doubt

whatever. Whatsoever deductions, if any, may be made from the above

estimate, it is, nevertheless, an _under-estimate_ for maintaining,

at the present expense of washing, a proper amount of cleanliness in

linen.”

Proceeding, however, with the calculation as to the loss from the

imperfect scavenging of the metropolis, we have the following results:--

LOSS FROM DUST AND DIRT IN THE STREETS OF THE METROPOLIS, OWING TO THE

EXTRA WASHING ENTAILED THEREBY.

According to the Board of Health,

taking the yearly amount of the washing

of the metropolis at 5,000,000_l._,

and assuming the washing to be

doubled by street-dirt, the loss will be £2,500,000

Calculating the washing, however,

for reasons above adduced, to be only

2,750,000_l._, and to be as much again

as it might be under an improved

system of scavenging, the loss will be 1,375,000

Or calculating, _as a minimum_, that

the remediable loss is less than one-half,

the cost is £1,000,000

Hence it would appear that the loss from dust and dirt is _really

enormous_.

In a work entitled “Sanatory Progress,” being the Fifth Report of the

National Philanthropic Association, I find a calculation as to the

losses sustained from dust and dirt upon our clothes. Owing to the

increased wear from daily brushing to remove the dust, and occasional

scraping to remove the mud, the loss is estimated at from 3_l._ to

7_l._ per annum for each well-dressed man and woman, and 1_l._ for

inferiorly-dressed persons, including their Sunday and holiday clothing.

I inquired of a West-end tailor, who previously to his establishment in

business had himself been an operative, and had had experience both in

town and country as to the wear of clothes, and I learned from him the

following particulars.

With regard to the clothes of the wealthy classes, of those who could

always command a carriage in bad weather, there are no means of judging

as to the loss caused by bad scavengery.

My informant, however, obliged me with the following calculations,

the results of his experience. His trade is what I may describe as a

medium business, between the low slop and the high fashionable trades.

The garments of which he spoke were those worn by clerks, shopmen,

students, tradesmen, town-travellers, and others not engaged in menial

or handicraft labour.

Altogether, and after consulting his books relative to town and country

customers, my informant thought it might be easy to substantiate the

following estimate as regards the duration and cost of clothes in town

and country among the classes I have specified.

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 157 / 558 题