3. _The wood pavement._

The stone pavement has generally, in the several towns of England,

been composed of whatever material the quarries or rocks of the

neighbourhood supplied, limestone being often thus used. In some

places, where there were no quarries available, the stones of a river

or rivulet-side were used, but these were rounded and slippery,

and often formed but a rugged pathway. For London pavement, the

neighbourhood not being rich in stone quarries, granite has usually

been brought by water from Scotland, and a small quantity from Guernsey

for the pavement of the streets. The stone pavement is made by the

placing of the granite stones, hewn and shaped ready for the purpose,

side by side, with a foundation of concrete. The concrete now used for

the London street-pavement is Thames ballast, composed of shingles, or

small stones, and mixed with lime, &c.

Macadamization was not introduced into the _streets_ of London until

about 25 years ago. Before that, it had been carried to what was

accounted a great degree of perfection on many of the principal mail

and coach roads. Some 50 miles on the Great North Road, or that between

London and Carlisle, were often pointed out as an admirable specimen of

road-making on Mac Adam’s principles. This road was well known in the

old coaching days as Leming-lane, running from Boroughbridge to Greta

Bridge, in Yorkshire.

The first thoroughfare in London which was macadamized, a word adapted

from the name of Sir W. Mac Adam, the originator or great improver of

the system, was St. James’s-square; after that, some of the smaller

streets in the aristocratic parishes of St. James and St. George were

thus paved, and then, but not without great opposition, Piccadilly. The

opposition to the macadamizing of the latter thoroughfare assumed many

forms. Independently of the conflicting statements as to extravagance

and economy, it was urged by the opponents, that the dust and dirt

of the new style of paving would cause the street to be deserted by

the aristocracy--that the noiselessness of the traffic would cause

the deaths of the deaf and infirm--that the aristocracy promoted

this new-fangled street-making, that they might the better “sleep o’

nights,” regardless of all else. One writer especially regretted that

the Duke of Queensberry, popularly known as “Old Q.,” who resided at

the western end of Piccadilly, had not lived to enjoy, undisturbed

by vulgar noises, his bed of down, until it was his hour to rise and

take his bath of perfumed milk! In short, there was all the fuss and

absurdity which so often characterise local contests.

The macadamized street is made by a layer of stones, broken small

and regular in size, and spread evenly over the road, so that the

pressure and friction of the traffic will knead, grind, crush, and

knit them into one compact surface. Until road-making became better

understood, or until the early part of the present century, the

roads even in the suburbs immediately connected with London, such as

Islington, Kingsland, Stoke Newington, and Hackney, were “repaired

when they wanted it.” If there were a “rut,” or a hole, it was filled

up or covered over with stones, and as the drivers usually avoided

such parts, for the sake of their horses’ feet, another rut was

speedily formed alongside of the original one. Under the old system,

road-mending was patch-work; defects were sought to be remedied, but

there was little or no knowledge of constructing or of reconstructing

the surface as a whole.

The wood pavement came last, and was not established, even partially,

until eleven or twelve years ago. One of the earliest places so paved

was the Old Bailey, in order that the noise of the street-traffic might

be deadened in the Criminal Courts. The same plan was adopted alongside

some of the churches, and other public buildings, where external

quietude, or, at any rate, diminished noise, was desired. At the first,

there were great complaints made, and frequent expostulations addressed

to the editors of the newspapers, as to the slipperiness of the wooden

ways. The wood pavement is formed of blocks of wood, generally deal,

fitted to one another by grooves, by joints, or by shape, for close

adjustment. They are placed on the road over a body of concrete, in the

same way as granite.

“In constructing roads, or rather streets, through towns or cities,

where the amount of traffic is considerable, it will be found

desirable,” says Mr. Law, in his ‘Treatise on the Constructing

and Repairing of Roads,’ “to pave their surface. The advantages

belonging to pavements in such situations over macadamized roads are

considerable; where the latter are exposed to an incessant and heavy

traffic, their surface becomes rapidly worn, rendering constant repairs

requisite, which are not only attended with very heavy expense, but

also render the road very unpleasant for being travelled upon while

being done; they also require much more attention in the way of

scraping or sweeping, and in raking in ruts. And some difficulty would

be experienced in towns to find places in which the materials, which

would be constantly wanted for repairing the road, could be deposited.

In dry weather the macadamized road would always be dusty, and in wet

weather it would be covered with mud. The only advantage which such a

road really possesses over a pavement is the less noise produced by

carriages in passing over it; but this advantage is very small when the

pavement is properly laid.”

Concerning wood pavements the same gentleman says, “Of late years

wood has been introduced as a material for paving streets, and has

been rather extensively employed both in Russia and America. It has

been tried in various parts of London, and generally with small

success, the cause of its failure being identical with the cause of

the enormous sums being spent annually in the repairs of the streets

generally, namely, the want of a proper foundation; a want which was

sooner felt with wood than with granite, in consequence of the less

weight and inertia of the wood. The comfort resulting from the use

of wooden pavement, both to those who travelled, and those who lived

in the streets, from the diminished jolting and noise, was so great,

that it is just matter of surprise that so little care was taken in

forming that which a very little consideration would have shown to be

indispensable to its success, namely, a good foundation. Slipperiness

of its surface, in particular states of the weather, was also found

to be a disadvantage belonging to wooden pavement; but means might be

devised which would render its surface at all times safe, and afford

a secure footing for horses. As regards durability, it has scarcely

been used for a sufficient period to allow a comparison being made with

other materials, but from the result of some observations communicated

by Mr. Hope to the Scottish Society of Arts, it appears that wooden

blocks when placed with the end of the grain exposed, wear _less than

granite_. At first sight, this result might appear questionable,

but it is a well-ascertained fact that, where wood and iron move in

contact in machinery, the iron generally wears more rapidly than the

wood, the reason appearing to be, that the surface of the wood soon

becomes covered with particles of dust and grit, which become partially

embedded in it, and, while they serve to protect the wood, convert its

surface into a species of file, which rapidly wears away whatever it

rubs against.”

Such then are the different modes of constructing the London roads

or streets. I shall now endeavour to show the relative length,

and relative cost of the streets thus severally prepared for the

commercial, professional, and pleasurable transit of the metropolis.

The comparative extent of the macadamized, of the stone, and of the

wood pavement of the streets of the metropolis has not as yet been

ascertained, for no general account has appeared condensing the

reports, returns, accounts, &c., of the several specific bodies of

management into one grand total.

It is, however, possible to arrive at an approximation as to

the comparative extent I have spoken of; and in this attempt at

approximation, in the absence of all means of a definite statistical

computation, I have had the assistance of an experienced and practical

surveyor, familiar with the subject.

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 146 / 558 题