OF THE “PURE”-FINDERS.

Dogs’-dung is called “Pure,” from its cleansing and purifying

properties.

The name of “Pure-finders,” however, has been applied to the men

engaged in collecting dogs’-dung from the public streets only, within

the last 20 or 30 years. Previous to this period there appears to

have been no men engaged in the business, old women alone gathered

the substance, and they were known by the name of “bunters,” which

signifies properly gatherers of rags; and thus plainly intimates that

the rag-gatherers originally added the collecting of “Pure” to their

original and proper vocation. Hence it appears that the bone-grubbers,

rag-gatherers, and pure-finders, constituted formerly but one

class of people, and even now they have, as I have stated, kindred

characteristics.

The pure-finders meet with a ready market for all the dogs’-dung they

are able to collect, at the numerous tanyards in Bermondsey, where

they sell it by the stable-bucket full, and get from 8_d._ to 10_d._

per bucket, and sometimes 1_s._ and 1_s._ 2_d._ for it, according to

its quality. The “dry limy-looking sort” fetches the highest price

at some yards, as it is found to possess more of the alkaline, or

purifying properties; but others are found to prefer the dark moist

quality. Strange as it may appear, the preference for a particular kind

has suggested to the finders of Pure the idea of adulterating it to a

very considerable extent; this is effected by means of mortar broken

away from old walls, and mixed up with the whole mass, which it closely

resembles; in some cases, however, the mortar is rolled into small

balls similar to those found. Hence it would appear, that there is no

business or trade, however insignificant or contemptible, without its

own peculiar and appropriate tricks.

The pure-finders are in their habits and mode of proceeding nearly

similar to the bone-grubbers. Many of the pure-finders are, however,

better in circumstances, the men especially, as they earn more money.

They are also, to a certain extent, a better educated class. Some of

the regular collectors of this substance have been mechanics, and

others small tradesmen, who have been reduced. Those pure-finders who

have “a good connection,” and have been granted permission to cleanse

some kennels, obtain a very fair living at the business, earning from

10_s._ to 15_s._ a week. These, however, are very few; the majority

have to seek the article in the streets, and by such means they can

obtain only from 6_s._ to 10_s._ a week. The average weekly earnings of

this class are thought to be about 7_s._ 6_d._

From all the inquiries I have made on this subject, I have found that

there cannot be less than from 200 to 300 persons constantly engaged

solely in this business. There are about 30 tanyards large and small

in Bermondsey, and these all have their regular Pure collectors from

whom they obtain the article. Leomont and Roberts’s, Bavingtons’,

Beech’s, Murrell’s, Cheeseman’s, Powell’s, Jones’s, Jourdans’, Kent’s,

Moorcroft’s, and Davis’s, are among the largest establishments, and

some idea of the amount of business done in some of these yards may

be formed from the fact, that the proprietors severally employ from

300 to 500 tanners. At Leomont and Roberts’s there are 23 regular

street-finders, who supply them with pure, but this is a large

establishment, and the number supplying them is considered far beyond

the average quantity; moreover, Messrs. Leomont and Roberts do more

business in the particular branch of tanning in which the article

is principally used, viz., in dressing the leather for book-covers,

kid-gloves, and a variety of other articles. Some of the other

tanyards, especially the smaller ones, take the substance only as

they happen to want it, and others again employ but a limited number

of hands. If, therefore, we strike an average, and reduce the number

supplying each of the several yards to eight, we shall have 240 persons

regularly engaged in the business: besides these, it may be said that

numbers of the starving and destitute Irish have taken to picking up

the material, but not knowing where to sell it, or how to dispose of

it, they part with it for 2_d._ or 3_d._ the pail-full to the regular

purveyors of it to the tanyards, who of course make a considerable

profit by the transaction. The children of the poor Irish are usually

employed in this manner, but they also pick up rags and bones, and

anything else which may fall in their way.

I have stated that some of the pure-finders, especially the men, earn

a considerable sum of money per week; their gains are sometimes as

much as 15_s._; indeed I am assured that seven years ago, when they

got from 3_s._ to 4_s._ per pail for the pure, that many of them would

not exchange their position with that of the best paid mechanic in

London. Now, however, the case is altered, for there are twenty now at

the business for every one who followed it then; hence each collects

so much the less in quantity, and, moreover, from the competition gets

so much less for the article. Some of the collectors at present do not

earn 3_s._ per week, but these are mostly old women who are feeble and

unable to get over the ground quickly; others make 5_s._ and 6_s._ in

the course of the week, while the most active and those who clean out

the kennels of the dog fanciers may occasionally make 9_s._ and 10_s._

and even 15_s._ a week still, but this is of very rare occurrence.

Allowing the finders, one with the other, to earn on an average 5_s._

per week, it would give the annual earnings of each to be 13_l._,

while the income of the whole 200 would amount to 50_l._ a week, or

2600_l._ per annum. The kennel “pure” is not much valued, indeed many

of the tanners will not even buy it, the reason is that the dogs of

the “fanciers” are fed on almost anything, to save expense; the kennel

cleaners consequently take the precaution of mixing it with what is

found in the street, previous to offering it for sale.

The pure-finder may at once be distinguished from the bone-grubber and

rag-gatherer; the latter, as I have before mentioned, carries a bag,

and usually a stick armed with a spike, while he is most frequently

to be met with in back streets, narrow lanes, yards and other places,

where dust and rubbish are likely to be thrown out from the adjacent

houses. The pure-finder, on the contrary, is often found in the open

streets, as dogs wander where they like. The pure-finders always carry

a handle basket, generally with a cover, to hide the contents, and have

their right hand covered with a black leather glove; many of them,

however, dispense with the glove, as they say it is much easier to wash

their hands than to keep the glove fit for use. The women generally

have a large pocket for the reception of such rags as they may chance

to fall in with, but they pick up those only of the very best quality,

and will not go out of their way to search even for them. Thus equipped

they may be seen pursuing their avocation in almost every street in and

about London, excepting such streets as are now cleansed by the “street

orderlies,” of whom the pure-finders grievously complain, as being an

unwarrantable interference with the privileges of their class.

The pure collected is used by leather-dressers and tanners, and more

especially by those engaged in the manufacture of morocco and kid

leather from the skins of old and young goats, of which skins great

numbers are imported, and of the roans and lambskins which are the

sham morocco and kids of the “slop” leather trade, and are used by the

better class of shoemakers, bookbinders, and glovers, for the inferior

requirements of their business. Pure is also used by tanners, as is

pigeon’s dung, for the tanning of the thinner kinds of leather, such as

calf-skins, for which purpose it is placed in pits with an admixture of

lime and bark.

In the manufacture of moroccos and roans the pure is rubbed by the

hands of the workman into the skin he is dressing. This is done to

“purify” the leather, I was told by an intelligent leather-dresser, and

from that term the word “pure” has originated. The dung has astringent

as well as highly alkaline, or, to use the expression of my informant,

“scouring,” qualities. When the pure has been rubbed into the flesh and

grain of the skin (the “flesh” being originally the interior, and the

“grain” the exterior part of the cuticle), and the skin, thus purified,

has been hung up to be dried, the dung removes, as it were, all such

moisture as, if allowed to remain, would tend to make the leather

unsound or imperfectly dressed. This imperfect dressing, moreover,

gives a disagreeable smell to the leather--and leather-buyers often use

both nose and tongue in making their purchases--and would consequently

prevent that agreeable odour being imparted to the skin which is found

in some kinds of morocco and kid. The peculiar odour of the Russia

leather, so agreeable in the libraries of the rich, is derived from the

bark of young birch trees. It is now manufactured in Bermondsey.

Among the morocco manufacturers, especially among the old operatives,

there is often a scarcity of employment, and they then dress a few

roans, which they hawk to the cheap warehouses, or sell to the

wholesale shoemakers on their own account. These men usually reside in

small garrets in the poorer parts of Bermondsey, and carry on their

trade in their own rooms, using and keeping the pure there; hence

the “homes” of these poor men are peculiarly uncomfortable, if not

unhealthy. Some of these poor fellows or their wives collect the pure

themselves, often starting at daylight for the purpose; they more

frequently, however, buy it of a regular finder.

The number of pure-finders I heard estimated, by a man well acquainted

with the tanning and other departments of the leather trade, at from

200 to 250. The finders, I was informed by the same person, collected

about a pail-full a day, clearing 6_s._ a week in the summer--1_s._

and 1_s._ 2_d._ being the charge for a pail-full; in the short days

of winter, however, and in bad weather, they could not collect five

pail-fulls in a week.

In the wretched locality already referred to as lying between the Docks

and Rosemary-lane, redolent of filth and pregnant with pestilential

diseases, and whither all the outcasts of the metropolitan population

seem to be drawn, either in the hope of finding fitting associates and

companions in their wretchedness (for there is doubtlessly something

attractive and agreeable to them in such companionship), or else for

the purpose of hiding themselves and their shifts and struggles for

existence from the world,--in this dismal quarter, and branching from

one of the many narrow lanes which interlace it, there is a little

court with about half-a-dozen houses of the very smallest dimensions,

consisting of merely two rooms, one over the other. Here in one of

the upper rooms (the lower one of the same house being occupied by

another family and apparently _filled_ with little ragged children), I

discerned, after considerable difficulty, an old woman, a Pure-finder.

When I opened the door the little light that struggled through the

small window, the many broken panes of which were stuffed with old

rags, was not sufficient to enable me to perceive who or what was in

the room. After a short time, however, I began to make out an old

chair standing near the fire-place, and then to discover a poor old

woman resembling a bundle of rags and filth stretched on some dirty

straw in the corner of the apartment. The place was bare and almost

naked. There was nothing in it except a couple of old tin kettles and a

basket, and some broken crockeryware in the recess of the window. To my

astonishment I found this wretched creature to be, to a certain extent,

a “superior” woman; she could read and write well, spoke correctly, and

appeared to have been a person of natural good sense, though broken up

with age, want, and infirmity, so that she was characterized by all

that dull and hardened stupidity of manner which I have noticed in the

class. She made the following statement:--

“I am about 60 years of age. My father was a milkman, and very well

off; he had a barn and a great many cows. I was kept at school till I

was thirteen or fourteen years of age; about that time my father died,

and then I was taken home to help my mother in the business. After a

while things went wrong; the cows began to die, and mother, alleging

she could not manage the business herself, married again. I soon found

out the difference. Glad to get away, anywhere out of the house, I

married a sailor, and was very comfortable with him for some years; as

he made short voyages, and was often at home, and always left me half

his pay. At last he was pressed, when at home with me, and sent away;

I forget now where he was sent to, but I never saw him from that day

to this. The only thing I know is that some sailors came to me four

or five years after, and told me that he deserted from the ship in

which he had gone out, and got on board the _Neptune_, East Indiaman,

bound for Bombay, where he acted as boatswain’s mate; some little time

afterwards, he had got intoxicated while the ship was lying in harbour,

and, going down the side to get into a bumboat, and buy more drink,

he had fallen overboard and was drowned. I got some money that was

due to him from the India House, and, after that was all gone, I went

into service, in the Mile-end Road. There I stayed for several years,

till I met my second husband, who was bred to the water, too, but as a

waterman on the river. We did very well together for a long time, till

he lost his health. He became paralyzed like, and was deprived of the

use of all one side, and nearly lost the sight of one of his eyes; this

was not very conspicuous at first, but when we came to get pinched, and

to be badly off, then any one might have seen that there was something

the matter with his eye. Then we parted with everything we had in the

world; and, at last, when we had no other means of living left, we

were advised to take to gathering ‘Pure.’ At first I couldn’t endure

the business; I couldn’t bear to eat a morsel, and I was obliged to

discontinue it for a long time. My husband kept at it though, for he

could do _that_ well enough, only he couldn’t walk as fast as he ought.

He couldn’t lift his hands as high as his head, but he managed to work

under him, and so put the Pure in the basket. When I saw that he, poor

fellow, couldn’t make enough to keep us both, I took heart and went out

again, and used to gather more than he did; that’s fifteen years ago

now; the times were good then, and we used to do very well. If we only

gathered a pail-full in the day, we could live very well; but we could

do much more than that, for there wasn’t near so many at the business

then, and the Pure was easier to be had. For my part I can’t tell where

all the poor creatures have come from of late years; the world seems

growing worse and worse every day. They have pulled down the price of

Pure, that’s certain; but the poor things must do something, they can’t

starve while there’s anything to be got. Why, no later than six or

seven years ago, it was as high as 3_s._ 6_d._ and 4_s._ a pail-full,

and a ready sale for as much of it as you could get; but now you can

only get 1_s._ and in some places 1_s._ 2_d._ a pail-full; and, as

I said before, there are so many at it, that there is not much left

for a poor old creature like me to find. The men that are strong and

smart get the most, of course, and some of them do very well, at least

they manage to live. Six years ago, my husband complained that he was

ill, in the evening, and lay down in the bed--we lived in Whitechapel

then--he took a fit of coughing, and was smothered in his own blood. O

dear” (the poor old soul here ejaculated), “what troubles I have gone

through! I had eight children at one time, and there is not one of them

alive now. My daughter lived to 30 years of age, and then she died in

childbirth, and, since then, I have had nobody in the wide world to

care for me--none but myself, all alone as I am. After my husband’s

death I couldn’t do much, and all my things went away, one by one,

until I’ve nothing but bare walls, and that’s the reason why I was

vexed at first at your coming in, sir. I was yesterday out all day, and

went round Aldgate, Whitechapel, St. George’s East, Stepney, Bow, and

Bromley, and then came home; after that, I went over to Bermondsey,

and there I got only 6_d._ for my pains. To-day I wasn’t out at all;

I wasn’t well; I had a bad headache, and I’m so much afraid of the

fevers that are all about here--though I don’t know why I should be

afraid of them--I was lying down, when you came, to get rid of my

pains. There’s such a dizziness in my head now, I feel as if it didn’t

belong to me. No, I have earned no money to-day. I have had a piece

of dried bread that I steeped in water to eat. I haven’t eat anything

else to-day; but, pray, sir, don’t tell anybody of it. I could never

bear the thought of going into the ‘great house’ [workhouse]; I’m so

used to the air, that I’d sooner die in the street, as many I know have

done. I’ve known several of our people, who have sat down in the street

with their basket alongside them, and died. I knew one not long ago,

who took ill just as she was stooping down to gather up the Pure, and

fell on her face; she was taken to the London Hospital, and died at

three o’clock in the morning. I’d sooner die like them than be deprived

of my liberty, and be prevented from going about where I liked. No,

I’ll never go into the workhouse; my master is kind to me” [the tanner

whom she supplies]. “When I’m ill, he sometimes gives me a sixpence;

but there’s one gentleman has done us great harm, by forcing so many

into the business. He’s a poor-law guardian, and when any poor person

applies for relief, he tells them to go and gather Pure, and that

he’ll buy it of them (for he’s in the line), and so the parish, you

see, don’t have to give anything, and that’s one way that so many have

come into the trade of late, that the likes of me can do little or no

good at it. Almost every one I’ve ever known engaged at Pure-finding

were people who were better off once. I knew a man who went by the

name of Brown, who picked up Pure for years before I went to it; he

was a very quiet man; he used to lodge in Blue Anchor-yard, and seldom

used to speak to anybody. We two used to talk together sometimes,

but never much. One morning he was found dead in his bed; it was of

a Tuesday morning, and he was buried about 12 o’clock on the Friday

following. About 6 o’clock on that afternoon, three or four gentlemen

came searching all through this place, looking for a man named Brown,

and offering a reward to any who would find him out; there was a whole

crowd about them when I came up. One of the gentlemen said that the man

they wanted had lost the first finger of his right hand, and then I

knew that it was the man that had been buried only that morning. Would

you believe it, Mr. Brown was a real gentleman all the time, and had a

large estate, of I don’t know how many thousand pounds, just left him,

and the lawyers had advertised and searched everywhere for him, but

never found him, you may say, till he was dead. We discovered that his

name was not Brown; he had only taken that name to hide his real one,

which, of course, he did not want any one to know. I’ve often thought

of him, poor man, and all the misery he might have been spared, if the

good news had only come a year or two sooner.”

Another informant, a Pure-collector, was originally in the Manchester

cotton trade, and held a lucrative situation in a large country

establishment. His salary one year exceeded 250_l._, and his regular

income was 150_l._ “This,” he says, “I lost through drink and neglect.

My master was exceedingly kind to me, and has even assisted me since I

left his employ. He bore with me patiently for many years, but the love

of drink was so strong upon me that it was impossible for him to keep

me any longer.” He has often been drunk, he tells me, for three months

together; and he is now so reduced that he is ashamed to be seen. When

at his master’s it was his duty to carve and help the other assistants

belonging to the establishment, and his hand used to shake so violently

that he has been ashamed to lift the gravy spoon.

At breakfast he has frequently waited till all the young men had left

the table before he ventured to taste his tea; and immediately, when he

was alone, he has bent his head down to his cup to drink, being utterly

incapable of raising it to his lips. He says he is a living example of

the degrading influence of drink. All his friends have deserted him. He

has suffered enough, he tells me, to make him give it up. He earned the

week before I saw him 5_s._ 2_d._; and the week before that, 6_s._

Before leaving me I prevailed upon the man to “take the pledge.” This

is now eighteen months ago, and I have not seen him since.

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 117 / 558 题