3. The dustmen and nightmen, the sweeps and the scavengers.

The first class go abroad daily to _find_ in the streets, and carry

away with them such things as bones, rags, “pure” (or dogs’-dung),

which no one appropriates. These they sell, and on that sale support

a wretched life. The second class of people are also as strictly

_finders_; but their industry, or rather their labour, is confined to

the river, or to that subterranean city of sewerage unto which the

Thames supplies the great outlets. These persons may not be immediately

connected with the _streets_ of London, but their pursuits are carried

on in the open air (if the sewer-air may be so included), and are all,

at any rate, out-of-door avocations. The third class is distinct from

either of these, as the labourers comprised in it are not finders, but

_collectors_ or _removers_ of the dirt and filth of our streets and

houses, and of the soot of our chimneys.

The two first classes also differ from the third in the fact that the

sweeps, dustmen, scavengers, &c., are paid (and often large sums) for

the removal of the refuse they collect; whereas the bone-grubbers, and

mud-larks, and pure-finders, and dredgermen, and sewer-hunters, get for

their pains only the value of the articles they gather.

Herein, too, lies a broad distinction between the street-finder, or

collector, and the street-buyer: though both deal principally with

refuse, the buyer _pays_ for what he is permitted to take away; whereas

the finder or collector is either paid (like the sweep), or else he

neither pays nor is paid (like the bone-grubber), for the refuse that

he removes.

The third class of street-collectors also presents another and a

markedly distinctive characteristic. They act in the capacity of

servants, and do not depend upon chance for the result of their day’s

labour, but are put to stated tasks, being employed and paid a fixed

sum for their work. To this description, however, some of the sweeps

present an exception; as when the sweep works on his own account, or,

as it is worded, “is his own master.”

The public health requires the periodical cleaning of the streets, and

the removal of the refuse matter from our dwellings; and the man who

contracts to carry on this work is decidedly a street-collector; for

on what he collects or removes depends the amount of his remuneration.

Thus a wealthy contractor for the public scavengery, is as entirely one

of the street-folk as the unskilled and ignorant labourer he employs.

The master lives, and, in many instances, has become rich, on the

results of his street employment; for, of course, the actual workmen

are but as the agents or sources of his profit. Even the collection of

“pure” (dogs’-dung) in the streets, if conducted by the servants of any

tanner or leather dresser, either for the purposes of his own trade or

for sale to others, might be the occupation of a wealthy man, deriving

a small profit from the labour of each particular collector. The same

may also be said of bone-grubbing, or any similar occupation, however

insignificant, and now abandoned to the outcast.

Were the collection of mud and dust carried on by a number of distinct

individuals--that is to say, were each individual dustman and scavenger

to collect on his own account, there is no doubt that no _one man_

could amass a fortune by such means--while if the collection of bones

and rags and even dogs’-dung were carried on “in the large way,” that

is to say, by a number of individual collectors working for one “head

man,” even the picking up of the most abject refuse of the metropolis

might become the source of great riches.

The bone-grubber and the mud-lark (the searcher for refuse on the

banks of the river) differ little in their pursuits or in their

characteristics, excepting that the mud-larks are generally boys, which

is more an accidental than a definite distinction. The grubbers are

with a few exceptions stupid, unconscious of their degradation, and

with little anxiety to be relieved from it. They are usually taciturn,

but this taciturn habit is common to men whose callings, if they

cannot be called solitary, are pursued with little communication with

others. I was informed by a man who once kept a little beer-shop near

Friar-street, Southwark Bridge-road (where then and still, he thought,

was a bone-grinding establishment), that the bone-grubbers who carried

their sacks of bones thither sometimes had a pint of beer at his house

when they had received their money. They usually sat, he told me,

silently looking at the corners of the floor--for they rarely lifted

their eyes up--as if they were expecting to see some bones or refuse

there available for their bags. Of this inertion, perhaps fatigue and

despair may be a part. I asked some questions of a man of this class

whom I saw pick up in a road in the suburbs something that appeared to

have been a coarse canvas apron, although it was wet after a night’s

rain and half covered with mud. I inquired of him what he thought

about when he trudged along looking on the ground on every side. His

answer was, “Of nothing, sir.” I believe that no better description

could be given of that vacuity of mind or mental inactivity which

seems to form a part of the most degraded callings. The minds of such

men, even without an approach to idiotcy, appear to be a blank. One

characteristic of these poor fellows, bone-grubbers and mud-larks, is

that they are very poor, although I am told some of them, the older

men, have among the poor the reputation of being misers. It is not

unusual for the youths belonging to these callings to live with their

parents and give them the amount of their earnings.

The sewer-hunters are again distinct, and a far more intelligent and

adventurous class; but they work in gangs. They must be familiar with

the course of the tides, or they might be drowned at high water. They

must have quick eyes too, not merely to descry the objects of their

search, but to mark the points and bearings of the subterraneous

roads they traverse; in a word, “to know their way underground.”

There is, moreover, some spirit of daring in venturing into a dark,

solitary sewer, the chart being only in the memory, and in braving

the possibility of noxious vapours, and the by no means insignificant

dangers of the rats infesting these places.

The dredgermen, the finders of the water, are again distinct, as being

watermen, and working in boats. In some foreign parts, in Naples, for

instance, men carrying on similar pursuits are also divers for anything

lost in the bay or its confluent waters. One of these men, known some

years ago as “the Fish,” could remain (at least, so say those whom

there is no reason to doubt) three hours under the water without

rising to the surface to take breath. He was, it is said, web-footed,

naturally, and partially web-fingered. The King of the Two Sicilies

once threw a silver cup into the sea for “the Fish” to bring up and

retain as a reward, but the poor diver was never seen again. It was

believed that he got entangled among the weeds on the rocks, and so

perished. The dredgermen are necessarily well acquainted with the sets

of the tide and the course of the currents in the Thames. Every one of

these men works on his own account, being as it were a “small master,”

which, indeed, is one of the great attractions of open-air pursuits.

The dredgermen also depend for their maintenance upon the sale of what

they find, or the rewards they receive.

It is otherwise, however, as was before observed, with the third class

of the street-finders, or rather collectors. In all the capacities of

dustmen, nightmen, scavengers, and sweeps, the employers of the men are

_paid_ to do the work, the proceeds of the street-collection forming

only a portion of the employer’s remuneration. The sweep has the soot

in addition to his 6_d._ or 1_s._; the master scavenger has a payment

from the parish funds to sweep the streets, though the clearance of

the cesspools, &c., in private houses, may be an individual bargain.

The whole refuse of the streets belongs to the contractor to make the

best of, but it must be cleared away, and so must the contents of a

dust-bin; for if a mass of dirt become offensive, the householder may

be indicted for a nuisance, and municipal by-laws require its removal.

It is thus made a matter of compulsion that the dust be removed from

a private house; but it is otherwise with the soot. Why a man should

be permitted to let soot accumulate in his chimney--perhaps exposing

himself, his family, his lodgers, and his neighbours to the dangers of

fire, it may not be easy to account for, especially when we bear in

mind that the same man may not accumulate cabbage-leaves and fish-tails

in his yard.

The dustmen are of the plodding class of labourers, mere labourers, who

require only bodily power, and possess little or no mental development.

Many of the agricultural labourers are of this order, and the dustman

often seems to be the stolid ploughman, modified by a residence in a

city, and engaged in a peculiar calling. They are generally uninformed,

and no few of them are dustmen because their fathers were. The same

may be said of nightmen and scavengers. At one time it was a popular,

or rather a vulgar notion that many dustmen had become possessed of

large sums, from the plate, coins, and valuables they found in clearing

the dust-bins--a manifest absurdity; but I was told by a marine-store

dealer that he had known a young woman, a dustman’s daughter, sell

silver spoons to a neighbouring marine-store man, who was “not very

particular.”

The circumstances and character of the chimney-sweeps have, since

Parliament “put down” the climbing boys, undergone considerable change.

The sufferings of many of the climbing boys were very great. They

were often ill-lodged, ill-fed, barely-clad, forced to ascend hot and

narrow flues, and subject to diseases--such as the chimney-sweep’s

cancer--peculiar to their calling. The child hated his trade, and was

easily tempted to be a thief, for prison was an asylum; or he grew

up a morose tyrannical fellow as journeyman or master. Some of the

young sweeps became very bold thieves and house-breakers, and the most

remarkable, as far as personal daring is concerned: the boldest feat of

escape from Newgate was performed by a youth who had been brought up

a chimney-sweep. He climbed up the two bare rugged walls of a corner

of the interior of the prison, in the open air, to the height of some

60 feet. He had only the use of his hands, knees, and feet, and a

single slip, from fear or pain, would have been death; he surmounted a

parapet after this climbing, and gained the roof, but was recaptured

before he could get clear away. He was, moreover, a sickly, and reputed

a cowardly, young man, and ended his career in this country by being

transported.

A master sweep, now in middle age, and a man “well to do,” told me that

when a mere child he had been apprenticed out of the workhouse to a

sweep, such being at that time a common occurrence. He had undergone,

he said, great hardships while learning his business, and was long,

from the indifferent character of his class, ashamed of being a sweep,

both as journeyman and master; but the sweeps were so much improved in

character now, that he no longer felt himself disgraced in his calling.

The sweeps are more intelligent than the mere ordinary labourers I have

written of under this head, but they are, of course, far from being an

educated body.

The further and more minute characteristics of the curious class of

street-finders or collectors will be found in the particular details

and statements.

Among the finders there is perhaps the greatest poverty existing,

they being the very lowest class of all the street-people. Many of

the very old live on the hard dirty crusts they pick up out of the

roads in the course of their rounds, washing them and steeping them

in water before they eat them. Probably that vacuity of mind which is

a distinguishing feature of the class is the mere atony or emaciation

of the mental faculties proceeding from--though often producing in the

want of energy that it necessarily begets--the extreme wretchedness

of the class. But even their liberty and a crust--as it frequently

literally is--appears preferable to these people to the restrictions of

the workhouse. Those who are unable to comprehend the inertia of both

body and mind begotten by the despair of long-continued misfortune are

referred to page 357 of the first volume of this work, where it will

be found that a tinman, in speaking of the misery connected with the

early part of his street-career, describes the effect of extreme want

as producing not only an absence of all hope, but even of a desire to

better the condition. Those, however, who have studied the mysterious

connection between body and mind, and observed what different creatures

they themselves are before and after dinner, can well understand that a

long-continued deficiency of food must have the same weakening effect

on the muscles of the mind and energy of the thoughts and will, as it

has on the limbs themselves.

Occasionally it will be found that the utter abjectness of the

bone-grubbers has arisen from the want of energy begotten by

intemperate habits. The workman has nothing but this same energy

to live upon, and the permanent effect of stimulating liquors is

to produce an amount of depression corresponding to the excitement

momentarily caused by them in the frame. The operative, therefore,

who spends his earnings on “drink,” not only squanders them on a

brutalising luxury, but deprives himself of the power, and consequently

of the disposition, to work for more, and hence that idleness,

carelessness, and neglect which are the distinctive qualities of the

drunkard, and sooner or later compass his ruin.

For the poor wretched children who are reared to this the lowest trade

of all, surely even the most insensible and unimaginative must feel

the acutest pity. There is, however, this consolation: I have heard

of none, with the exception of the more prosperous sewer-hunters and

dredgermen, who have remained all their lives at street-finding. Still

there remains much to be done by all those who are impressed with a

sense of the trust that has been confided to them, in the possession of

those endowments which render their lot in this world so much more easy

than that of the less lucky street-finders.

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 2 · 第 115 / 558 题