COMPANIONSHIP.

Learn to admire rightly; the great pleasure of life is that. Note what

the great men admired; they admired great things: narrow spirits admire

basely, and worship meanly."--THACKERAY.

"According to the temper and spirit by which it is influenced, prayer

opens or shuts the kingdom of life and peace on the soul of the

supplicant, elevating him either to a closer conjunction with the Lord

and his angelic kingdom, or plunging him into a more deplorable depth

of separation, by immersing him into association with the lost

spirits of darkness."--CLOWES.

* * * * *

Man was not born to live alone, and it is only in and through the

relations of the family and the social circle that the better parts of

his nature can be developed. Solitude is good occasionally, and they who

fly from it entirely can hardly attain to any high degree of spiritual

growth; but still in all useful solitude there must be a recognition of

some being beside self. He who turns to solitude only to brood over

thoughts of self, soon becomes a morbid egoist, and it is only when we

study in solitude in order to make our social life more wise and true

that our solitary hours are blessed.

Man really alone is something we can hardly imagine. He becomes

cognizable almost entirely through his relations with God and with his

fellow-men. Heathen philosophy sought to make man wise by withdrawing

him from the passions and affections that move him when associated with

his fellow-men, in order that he might devote himself to the study of

abstract truth. Christian philosophy teaches that truth owes its

sanctity to the Divine Love, which alone gives it Life; and that by

leading a life of love we acquire the power of understanding the truth.

Philosophy is a dead abstraction until piety and charity fill it with

the breath of life.

The offices of piety belong in great part to solitude, and the offices

of charity to society; but the principle of Companionship is involved in

both; for piety associates us with God as charity associates us with

man.

All Companionship involves the idea of both giving and receiving. In the

offices of piety, in proportion as we give a worship that is earnest and

heartfelt, is the warmth and clearness of the influx of heavenly love

and wisdom that we receive. In the offices of charity, our love is

warmed and our wisdom enlightened in proportion as we disinterestedly

seek the true happiness of those whose lives come within the sphere of

our influence, guided, not by blind instinct, but by an enlightened

Christianity. Thus the quality and quantity of what we receive from

Companionship depends on the quality and quantity of what we give.

There is no surer test of Character than the Companionship we habitually

seek; for we always prefer the society of those who administer to our

dominant love. Some seek the society of their superiors, others of their

equals, and others, again, of their inferiors; and the members of each

class are actuated in their choice by very various motives. Thus, among

the first class are found the ambitious, who seek their superiors

because they fancy themselves elevated by the reflection of the

attributes they admire; the proud, who fancy themselves degraded by

association with their inferiors; and the humble, who seek to be

advanced in goodness, in knowledge, or in refinement through intercourse

with those who excel. On the other hand are those who seek their

inferiors from the vanity that demands admiration as its daily food, or

the pride that feels itself oppressed in the presence of a superior, or

the philanthropy that loves to give of its stores to those less endowed

than itself. The middle class may be actuated in their choice by the

love of sympathy in their pursuits, or by a kind of indolence that is

disturbed by whatever differs much from itself. There is less purpose

and vitality in this class than in either of the others; but merely a

desire to float with the surrounding current, whithersoever it may tend.

The constituents of society are so varied in quality, that it would be

very difficult for any one to associate exclusively with a particular

class; and it may be doubted if we have a right to seek to do so. The

variety in social life is adapted to develop the various qualities of

the human soul far more perfectly than they could be if the different

classes of humanity were entirely separated in their walks. All should

be willing to give as well as to receive, and to this end all should be

willing to associate in a spirit of brotherly love with their superiors

or their inferiors without any feeling either of servility or of

elation. We may seek the society of our superiors in order to enrich

ourselves, and that of our inferiors in order to give freely even as we

have received; while with our equals we alternately give and receive,

for no two persons are so similarly endowed but that each may gain by

associating with the other. In truth, whichever way the balance may

incline, none ever give without receiving, and none can receive without

giving.

No Companionship is wise that does not involve the principle of growth.

If the influence of our associates does not make us go forward, it will

surely cause us to go backward. If we are not elevated by it, we shall

certainly be degraded. Two persons cannot associate and either party

remain just as he was before; and if we would find in society an element

of growth, we must seek for all that is elevating in whatever circles we

move; for it is not confined to any particular circle or class, but

waits everywhere for the true seeker.

Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth, said the Lord,

teaching as never man taught; and it is in proportion as we walk meekly

with our fellow-men that our capacities become capable of receiving, to

their fullest extent, the influx of goodness and truth that should be

the end of social intercourse. Nothing obstructs our receptivity so much

as that egoism of thought and affection which keeps self perpetually

before the mind's eye, and to this egoism meekness is the direct

opposite. Meekness implies forgetfulness of self. There is nothing

servile about it, but it pursues its way in pure simplicity, forgetting

self in its steadfast devotion to what it seeks. Egoism pursues its aims

from love of self and of the world, and confides in its own strength for

success. Meekness pursues its aims from the love of excellence, and

confiding in the strength of the Lord. The first love is dim of sight,

and often satisfies itself with the shadow of what it seeks, while its

strength is too feeble to grasp the higher forms of excellence. The

second love is full of light, because its eye is single; it can be

satisfied only with substance, and its endeavors know no limit, because

its strength comes from Him who never fails nor wearies.

Meekness is always ready to receive of the excellence it seeks, through

whatever medium it can be obtained; while egoism is perpetually hindered

in its advancement by its unwillingness to owe it to any source out of

self.

Similar results follow in giving as in receiving. Meekness gives in

simplicity from love to the neighbor, and feels as great pleasure in

imparting from its stores as in receiving additions to them, because the

pleasure it imparts is reflected back upon itself, making all its good

offices twice blessed. Egoism is twice cursed, as all that it receives

and all that it gives perpetually adds to its love of self; for it

values what it possesses because it is its own, and imparts to others

because it enjoys a feeling of superiority over the recipient of its

possessions. Meekness builds itself up; egoism puffs itself up. To

meekness Companionship is a perpetual source of healthful growth; while

to egoism it furnishes food only to supply the demands of a morbid

enlargement, destructive to all manly and womanly symmetry.

Society at large, according as we walk in it in a spirit of meekness or

a spirit of egoism, thus serves to develop and expand our powers, or to

narrow and degrade them more and more continually. To the casual

observer, the difference in the advancement of the two classes may not

in early life be apparent. The forth-putting pretension of egoism may

indeed cause it to seem the more rapidly advancing character of the two;

but the progress of years will widen the separation between their paths,

till it shall be seen as a great gulf, of which the opposite sides have

naught in common. Advancing age will show the egoist narrow-minded and

overbearing, peevish and fault-finding; while he who pursues his even

course, walking in Christian meekness with his fellow-men, will in old

age exhibit ever-enlarging charity and ever-expanding wisdom, and his

gray hairs will seem like a crown of glory.

It may seem almost needless to speak of the danger to Character that is

involved in seeking the Companionship of the worthless or the evil-

disposed. "Can one handle pitch and not be defiled?" Yet the usages of

society are so disordered, that the possession of wealth, family

distinction, or personal elegance, though accompanied by ignorance,

folly, or even dissoluteness, is sometimes a surer passport into what is

termed good society than the best culture of mind and heart, where

external advantages have been denied.

When we value mankind according to their external advantages, our moral

standard is as false as the drawing upon a Chinese plate. We have no

true moral perspective. Our ideas of right and wrong are confused and

imperfect, and in danger of becoming corrupt. We laugh at the stupidity

of the poor Chinaman in his attempts after beauty in art, while in

morals we are quite as stupid as he. Believing ourselves wise, we are

fools. It is very hard to escape being unduly influenced by the opinions

of society; but the more earnestly we seek true excellence for

ourselves, the more easily we learn to value true excellence in others,

and, to overlook the opinions of the world. The more independent we

become of opinion, the better will be the influence we exert upon

society, as well as that which we receive from it in return.

If the influence of our Companionship with those whom we meet in general

society and in the daily avocations of life be important, far more so is

that which comes to us through the friends whom we select from the world

at large as best adapted to minister to our happiness; and in proportion

as they are near and dear to us will their influence be strong and deep.

The choice of friends is influenced by an equal variety of motives, and

of a similar nature as those that lead to the selection of the social

circle. There is often no better foundation than selfishness for what

passes current in the world for ardent friendship. The selfish and

worldly love from selfish and worldly motives, and doubtless they

receive their reward; but if we would derive the advantages to Character

that result from a wise Companionship, we must select our friends

without undue regard to the opinions of the world, and impelled by a

desire for moral or intellectual advancement. Falsehood and fickleness

in friendship result from its being built upon merely selfish or

circumstantial foundations. When built upon mutual respect and

affection, it contains no element of decay or change; and they who trust

to any other foundation have no right to complain if their confidence is

abused and disappointed.

Persons sometimes suppose themselves the fast friends of others, when

their affection is merely the result of benefits received directly or

indirectly; and if these benefits are withheld, their supposed

friendship is dissipated at once, or perhaps changed to enmity. Such a

friendship is merely circumstantial, and has no just claim to the name.

Mere juxtaposition, the habit of seeing each other every day, is often

sufficient to produce what the parties concerned esteem friendship, and

to occasion the freest interchange of confidence. The slightest change

of circumstance, a few miles of separation, an inadvertent offence, a

trival difference of opinion, a clashing of interests, are, any one of

them, sufficient to bring such an intimacy to an end, and to cast

reproach upon the sacred name of friendship, when friendship had never

existed between the parties for a single moment.

Genuine friendship can exist only between persons of some elevation of

moral character, and its strength and devotion will be commensurate with

the degree of this moral elevation. Truthfulness, frankness,

disinterestedness, and faithfulness are qualities absolutely essential

to friendship, and these must be crowned by a sympathy that enters into

all the joys, the sorrows, and the interests of the friend, that

delights in all his upward progress, and, when he stumbles or falls, as

all at times must, stretches out the helping hand, not condescendingly

nor scornfully, but in the simplicity of true charity, that forgives

even as it would be forgiven, and is tender and patient even where it

condemns. In such a friendship there is no room for rivalry, weariness,

distrust, or anything subversive of confidence. With the selfish and the

worldly, such a connection cannot exist, because with them rivalries and

clashing interests must arise; for it is only among the seekers after

excellence that there is room for the gratification of the desires of

all. Neither can it exist between the false, for falsehood shuts the

door upon confidence; nor with the morally weak, the foolish, or the

idle, for they weary of each other even as they weary of themselves.

Of all earthly Companionship, there is none so deeply fraught with weal

or woe, with blessing or with cursing, as the Companionship of married

life. After this relationship is formed, although the threads still

remain the same, the whole warp and woof of the being are dyed with a

new color, woven according to a new pattern. Character is never the same

after marriage as before. There is a new impetus given by it to the

powers of thought and affection, inducing them to a different activity,

and deciding what tendencies are henceforth to take the lead in the

action of the mind; whether the soul is to spread its wings for a higher

flight than it has hitherto ventured, or to sit with closed pinions,

content to be of the earth, earthy. All are interested, even strangers,

In hearing of the establishment of a newly married pair in what relates

to the equipage of external life. Far more interesting would it be if we

could trace the mental establishing that is going on, as old traits of

character are confirmed or cast aside, and new ones developed or

implanted.

This union, so sacred that it even supersedes that which exists between

parent and child, should be entered upon only from the highest and

purest motives; and then, let worldly prosperity come or go as it may,

this twain whom God has joined, not by a mere formal ritual of the

Church, but by a true spiritual union that man cannot put asunder, are a

heaven unto themselves, and peace will ever dwell within their

habitation.

In proportion as a true marriage of the affections between the pure in

heart is productive of the highest happiness that can exist on earth, so

every remove from it diminishes the degree of this happiness until it

passes into the opposite, and becomes, in its most worldly and selfish

form, a fountain of misery, of a quality absolutely infernal.

Amid the disorder and imperfection reigning in the world, it is not to

be supposed that a large proportion of marriages should be truly

heavenly. In order to arrive at this, both parties must be of a higher

moral standing than is often reached at an age when marriage is usually

entered upon; but unless the character of each is inclined heavenward

there is no rational ground for anticipating happiness, except of the

lowest kind.

Many persons of a naturally amiable disposition enjoy what may seem a

high degree of happiness, through their sympathy with each other in

worldliness and ambition; but such happiness is not of a kind that can

endure the clouds and tempests of life. It is nourished only by the good

things of this world, and, if it cannot obtain them, is converted into

the greater wretchedness because the being who is dearest in life shares

this wretchedness. When, on the contrary, things heavenly are those most

highly prized and earnestly sought, each party helps to sustain the

other in all earthly privations and disappointments; for each is looking

beyond and above the trials of earth, and each is in possession of a

hope, nay, a fruition, that cannot be taken away, and which is dearer

than all that is lost. With them, to suffer together is to rob suffering

of half its weight, and almost all its bitterness. Whatever earthly

deprivation may befall them, the kingdom of heaven is ever within their

souls.

The Companionship of our fellow-beings is not confined to the living men

and women around us, but comes to us, through books, from all nations

and ages. Wise teachers stand ever ready to instruct us, gentle

moralists to console and strengthen us, poets to delight us. Scarce a

country village is so poor that there may not be found beneath its roofs

the printed words of more great men than ever lived at any one period of

the earth's history.

We are too apt to use books, as well as society, merely for our

amusement; to read the books that chance to fall into our hands, or to

associate with the persons we happen to meet with, and not stop to ask

ourselves if nothing better is within our reach. It may not be in our

power to associate with great living minds, but the mental wealth of the

past is within the reach of all. We boast much that we are a reading

people, but it may be well to inquire how intelligently we read. The

catalogues of books borrowed from our public libraries show, that, where

the readers of works of amusement are counted by hundreds, the readers

of instructive books are numbered by units. In conversation, it is not

uncommon to hear persons expressing indifference or dislike to whole

classes of books,--to hear Travels denounced as stupid, Biography as

tame, and History as heavy and dull. It does not seem to occur to the

mass of minds that any purpose beyond the amusement of the moment is to

be thought of in reading, or that any plan should be laid, or any

principles adopted, in the choice of books to be read.

It is undoubtedly a great good that nearly all our people are taught to

read, but it is a small fraction of the community that reads to much

good purpose. Children, so soon as they have acquired the use of the

alphabet, are inundated with little juvenile stories, some of them good,

but most of them silly, and many vulgar. As they grow older, successions

of similar works of fiction await them, until they arrive at

adolescence, when they are fully prepared for all the wealth of folly,

vulgarity, falsehood, and wickedness that is bound up within the yellow

covers of most of the cheap novels that infest every highway of the

nation.

As you are jostled through the streets of our populous cities, or take

your seat in a crowded railway-car, you are, perhaps, impressed with the

general air of rudeness that pervades the scene,--a rudeness of a kind

so new to the world, that, no old word sufficing to describe it, a new

name has been coined, and the swaggering, careless, sensual looking

beings, reeking with the fumes of tobacco, that make up the masses of

our moving population, are adequately described only by the word

_rowdy_. As yet, no title has been found for the female of this class,

--bold, dashing, loud-talking and loud-laughing, ignorant, vain, and so

coarse that she supposes fine clothes and assuming manners are all that

is necessary to elevate her to the rank of a lady. Perhaps you wonder

how so numerous a race of these beings has come to exist; but that boy

at your elbow, bending under the weight of his literary burden, is a

colporteur for converting the men and women of this "enlightened nation"

to rowdyism. Those books portray just such men and women as you see

before you, and that is why they are welcomed so warmly. A few cents

will buy from that boy enough folly and impurity to gorge a human mind

for a week, and possibly few among this throng often taste more

wholesome intellectual food.

It is probable that some of these persons are the children of

intelligent and well-bred parents; but their fathers were engrossed in

business, and their mothers in family cares, and thought they had no

time to form the moral and intellectual tastes of the immortal minds

committed to their charge. They fancied that if they sent their children

to good schools, and provided liberally for all their external wants,

they had done enough. Ignorant nursery maids, perhaps, taught them

morals and manners, while the father toiled to accumulate the means for

supplying their external wants, and the mother hemmed ruffles and

scolloped trimming to make people say, "How _sweetly_ those children are

dressed!" as the maid paraded them through the streets, teaching them

their first lessons in vulgar vanity.

A child may be educated at the best schools without acquiring any taste

for good literature. The way a parent treats a child in relation to its

books has far more influence in this respect than a teacher can possibly

possess. A mother, even if she is not an educated woman, can learn to

read understandingly, and can teach her child to read in the same way.

She can talk to it about its books, and awaken a desire in its mind to

understand what it reads. Children are always curious in regard to the

phenomena of nature, and whether this curiosity lives or dies depends

very much on the answers it receives to its first questions. If the

mother cannot answer them herself, she can help the child to find an

answer somewhere else, and she should beware how she deceives herself

with the idea that she has not time to attend to the moral and

intellectual wants of her child. She has no right to so immerse all her

own mind in the cares of life that she cannot, while attending to them,

talk rationally with her children. The mothers who best fulfil their

higher duties towards their children are quite as often found among

those who are compelled to almost constant industry of the hands, as

among those of abundant leisure. There is nothing in the handiwork of

the housekeeper or the seamstress that need absorb all the mental

attention; and hers must be an ill-regulated mind that cannot ply the

needle, or perform the more active duties of the household, and yet

listen to the child as it reads its little books, and converse with it

about the moral lessons or the intellectual instruction they contain.

The mother has it in her power to influence the mode in which the child

makes companions of its books more than any other person; and the

character of its Companionship with them through life will generally

depend in a great degree on the tastes and habits acquired in childhood.

Many parents who guard their children with jealous care from the

contamination of rude and vicious society among other children, allow

them to associate with ideal companions of a very degraded kind. The

parent should check the propensity, not only to read bad books, but also

to read idle or foolish books, by exciting the action of the mind

towards something better. Merely to deny improper books is not enough.

Something must be given in place of them, or the craving will continue,

and the child will be very apt to gratify its appetite in secret.

Children are easily led to observe nature, animate or inanimate, with

interest, and there are many simple books illustrating the departments

of natural science which mothers could make interesting to their

children at the same time that they instructed themselves. Juvenile

works on history abound, and through them the child may be led, as

intelligence expands, to seek more extended and thorough treatises; and

the sympathy of the mother should be ready to help him on his way. It is

mere self-deception in those mothers who deny their mental capacity, or

their command of time, to aid their children in their mental progress.

It is a _moral_ want of their own, far more than everything else, that

causes them to shrink from this most important responsibility.

Those who have passed the period of childhood, who have taken upon

themselves the responsibility of all that concerns their own minds, and

who have any desire after upward progress, should remember that the

books they love best are those which reflect their own characteristics.

Every one looks up to his favorite books, and the tone of his mind is

influenced by them in consequence. In our Companionship with our fellow-

beings we may be governed to a great extent by our desire to stand well

with the world, and therefore seek the society of those whom the world

most admires rather than those we most enjoy. In the choice of our books

there is much less influence of this kind exerted upon us. In the

retirement of our homes we may daily consort with the low or the wicked,

as they are delineated in books, and our standing with the world be in

no way affected, while the poison we imbibe will work all the more

surely that it works secretly. They whose ideas of right and wrong are

dependent on the judgment of the world may need even this poor guide,

and suffer from the want of it; for in doing what the world does not

know, and therefore cannot condemn, they may encounter evil and danger

from which even the love of the world would protect them, if the same

things were to be exposed to the public eye. We have no more moral right

to read bad books than to associate with bad men, and it would be well

for us in selecting our books to be governed by much the same principles

as in the selection of our associates; to feel that they are, in fact,

companions and friends whose opinions cannot fail to exert a powerful

influence upon us, and that we cannot associate with them

indiscriminately without great danger to our characters.

The Book of books, the Word of God, should occupy the first place in our

estimation; and the test question in regard to the value of all other

books is, whether they draw us towards, or away from, the Bible. So far

as they are written with a genuine love for goodness and truth, books in

every department of science and literature have a tendency, more or less

strong, to increase our reverence and love for the Source of all

goodness and truth; and no book can be subversive of our faith in the

Scriptures that has not its foundation laid in falsehood.

Nature may tell us of a Creator, but the Bible alone reveals a Father.

Nature describes him as far from us, removed beyond all sympathy, before

whose power we tremble, and whose mercy we might strive to propitiate by

sacrifices or entreaties; but from the Bible we learn that he is near at

hand, watching every pulsation of the heart, listening to every

aspiration that we breathe; that we walk with him so long as we obey his

commandments, and that though we may turn from him, he never turns from

us; that when we approach him in prayer, it should not be with fear,

but with love; and loving him with the knowledge that he first loved us,

we find that prayer, in its true form, is a Companionship, and that the

Father rejoices over his child in proportion as the child rejoices in

approaching the throne of mercy.

Pure and holy influences come to us immediately through our Companionship

with those among our fellow-beings who have received of the overflowings

of the Divine Fountain of goodness and truth. But when we reverently

approach that Fountain, we receive immediately, with a power and fulness

that can descend upon us through no human being.

What we receive through other mediums reaches only the lower and more

external planes of our being; but prayer brings us, if we pray aright,

before the throne of the Most High, and opens those inmost chambers of

the soul that remain for ever closed and empty unless they are opened

and filled by the immediate presence of the Lord. These constitute that

Holy of Holies which is the inmost of every human soul. The world at

large may enter its outer courts, chosen friends may minister before the

altar of its sanctuary, but within all this there is a holier place,

which none but the Lord can enter; for it is the seat of the vital

principle of the soul, which can be touched and quickened by no hand but

his.

The quality of the life of the whole being depends upon the degree in

which we suffer the Lord to dwell within our souls. His Companionship

fills and vivifies everything that is below it. The more entirely we

walk with the Lord, the more constant we shall be in the performance of

all our duties. The more entirely we open our hearts to his influence,

the more benefit we shall receive from all other influences. The more

reverently we listen to the truth that comes directly from him, the more

capable we shall be of finding out and appreciating the truth that comes

indirectly. The more we open our hearts to receive his love, the more

perfect will be the love we shall bear towards our fellow-beings. The

more constantly we feel that we are in his presence, the more perfect

will be the hourly outgoings of our lives.

Intimate Companionship with the Lord does not abstract us from the world

around us, but fills that world with new meanings. There is nothing

abstract in the nature of the Deity. He is operating perpetually upon

all nature. Gravity, organic life, instinct, human thought and

affection, are forms of his influx manifesting itself in varying

relations. Wherever he comes there is life, and his activity knows no

end.

Let no human being think that he holds Companionship with the Lord,

because he loves to retire apart, to pray, or to contemplate the divine

attributes, if, at such times, he looks down upon, and shuns the haunts

of men. The bigot may do so; and all his thoughts about things holy, all

his prayers, only confirm him in his spiritual pride. Every thought of

self-elevation, every feeling that tends towards "I am holier than

thou," smothers the breath of all true prayer, and associates us with

the spirit of evil; for our prayers cannot be blessed to us if pride

inspire them. Neither let any one suppose himself spiritual because

material life or material duties oppress him. God made the material

world as a school for his children; and he will not keep us here a

moment after we are prepared for a higher state. We are putting

ourselves back when we work impatiently, in the feeling that the duties

of life are beneath us.

If we would abide with our Heavenly Father, we must cooperate with him

perpetually. It is doing his will, not contemplating it, that teaches us

his attributes, and builds us up in his image and likeness. His fields

are ever white unto the harvest; let us work while it is yet day, ever

bearing in mind that he gives us the power to work, and that we can work

rightly only so long as we live in the constant acknowledgment of our

dependence upon Him.

The elements of character · 第 13 / 15 题