CHAPTER XX.

THE DEATH-GRAPPLE.

The triumph of the Republican party at the polls was the signal for the

work of dissolution to begin. Webster's terrific vision of "a land rent

with civil feuds" became reality in the short space of six weeks after

Lincoln's election, by the secession of South Carolina from the Union.

Quickly other Southern States followed, until a United States South was

organized, the chief stone in the corner of the new political edifice

being Negro slavery. It was not six weeks after the inauguration of

Abraham Lincoln, when the roar of cannon in Charleston Harbor announced

to the startled country that war between the States had begun. The first

call of the new President for troops to put down the rebellion and to

save the Union, and the patriotic uprising which it evoked made it plain

that the struggle thus opened was to be nothing less than a

death-grapple between the two sections.

Before the attack on Fort Sumter, Garrison was opposed to coercing the

rebel States back into the Union. He admitted the Constitutional power

of the National Government to employ force in maintaining the integrity

of the Republic. "The Federal Government must not pretend to be in

actual operation, embracing thirty-four States," the editor of the

_Liberator_ commented, "and then allow the seceding States to trample

upon its flag, steal its property, and defy its authority with impunity;

for it would then be (as it is at this moment) a mockery and a

laughing-stock. Nevertheless to think of whipping the South (for she

will be a unit on the question of slavery) into subjection, and

extorting allegiance from millions of people at the cannon's mouth, is

utterly chimerical. True, it is in the power of the North to deluge her

soil with blood, and inflict upon her the most terrible sufferings; but

not to conquer her spirit, or change her determination."

He, therefore, proposed that "the people of the North should recognize

the fact that THE UNION IS DISSOLVED, and act accordingly. They should

see, in the madness of the South, the hand of God, liberating them from

'a covenant with death' and an 'agreement with hell,' made in a time of

terrible peril, and without a conception of its inevitable consequences,

and which has corrupted their morals, poisoned their religion, petrified

their humanity as towards the millions in bondage, tarnished their

character, harassed their peace, burdened them with taxation, shackled

their prosperity, and brought them into abject vassalage."

It is not to be wondered at that Garrison, under the circumstances, was

for speeding the South rather than obstructing her way out of the Union.

For hardly ever had the anti-slavery cause seen greater peril than that

which hung over it during the months which elapsed between Lincoln's

election and the attack on Sumter, owing to the paralyzing apprehensions

to which the free States fell a prey in view of the then impending

disruption of their glorious Union. Indeed no sacrifice of anti-slavery

accomplishments, policy, and purpose of those States were esteemed too

important or sacred to make, if thereby the dissolution of the Union

might be averted. Many, Republicans as well as Democrats, were for

repealing the Personal Liberty Laws, and for the admission of New Mexico

as a State, with or without slavery, for the enforcement of the Fugitive

State Law, for suppressing the right of free speech and the freedom of

the press on the subject of slavery, and for surrendering the Northern

position in opposition to the extension of slavery to national

Territories, in order to placate the South and keep it in the Union.

Nothing could have possibly been more disastrous to the anti-slavery

movement in America than a Union saved on the terms proposed by such

Republican leaders as William H. Seward, Charles Francis Adams, Thomas

Corwin, and Andrew G. Curtin. The Union, under the circumstances, was

sure death to the slave, in disunion lay his great life-giving hope.

Therefore his tried and sagacious friend was for sacrificing the Union

to win for him freedom.

As the friends of the Union were disposed to haggle at no price to

preserve it, so was Garrison disposed to barter the Union itself in

exchange for the abolition of slavery. "Now, then, let there be a

CONVENTION OF THE FREE STATES," he suggested, "called to organize an

independent government on free and just principles; and let them say to

the slave States: Though you are without excuse for your treasonable

conduct, depart in peace! Though you have laid piratical hands on

property not your own, we surrender it all in the spirit of magnanimity!

And if nothing but the possession of the Capitol will appease you, take

even that without a struggle! Let the line be drawn between us where

free institutions end and slave institutions begin!"

But the thunder of the rebel guns in Charleston Harbor wrought in the

reformer a complete revolution in this regard. In the tremendous popular

uprising which followed that insult to the national flag he perceived

that the old order with its compromises and dispositions to agree to

anything, to do anything for the sake of preserving the Union had passed

away forever. When it was suggested as an objection to his change of

base that the "Administration is endeavoring to uphold the Union, the

Constitution, and the Laws, even as from the formation of the

Government," he was not for a moment deceived by its apparent force, but

replied sagely that "this is a verbal and technical view of the case."

"Facts are more potential than words," he remarked with philosophic

composure, "and events greater than parchment arrangements. The truth

is, the old Union is _nan est invenius_, and its restoration, with its

pro-slavery compromises, well-nigh impossible. The conflict is really

between the civilization of freedom and the barbarism of

slavery--between the principles of democracy and the doctrines of

absolutism--between the free North and the man-imbruting South;

therefore, to this extent hopeful for the cause of impartial liberty."

With the instinct of wise leadership, he adjusted himself and his little

band of Abolitionists, as far as he was able, to the exigencies of the

revolution. In his madness there was always remarkable method. When the

nation was apathetic, dead on the subject of slavery, he used every

power which he possessed or could invent to galvanize it into life. But

with the prodigious excitement which swept over the free States at the

outbreak of the war, Garrison saw that the crisis demanded different

treatment. Abolitionists and their moral machinery he felt should be

withdrawn, for a season at least, from their conspicuous place before

the public gaze, lest it happen that they should divert the current of

public opinion from the South to themselves, and thus injure the cause

of the slave. He accordingly deemed it highly expedient that the usual

anniversary of the American Anti-Slavery Society, held in New York,

ought, under the circumstances, to be postponed, coming as it would but

a few weeks after the attack on Sumter, and in the midst of the

tremendous loyal uprising against the rebels. This he did, adding, by

way of caution, this timely counsel: "Let nothing be done at this solemn

crisis needlessly to check or divert the mighty current of popular

feeling which is now sweeping southward with the strength and

impetuosity of a thousand Niagaras, in direct conflict with that haughty

and perfidious slave-power which has so long ruled the republic with a

rod of iron, for its own base and satanic purposes."

The singular tact and sagacity of the pioneer in this emergency may be

again seen in a letter to Oliver Johnson, who was at the time editing

the _Anti-Slavery Standard_. Says the pioneer: "Now that civil war has

begun, and a whirlwind of violence and excitement is to sweep through

the country, every day increasing in interest until its bloodiest

culmination, it is for the Abolitionists to 'stand still and see the

salvation of God,' rather than to attempt to add anything to the general

commotion. It is no time for minute criticism of Lincoln, Republicanism,

or even the other parties, now that they are fusing, for a death-grapple

with the Southern slave oligarchy; for they are instruments in the hands

of God to carry forward and help achieve the great object of

emancipation for which we have so long been striving.... We need great

circumspection and consummate wisdom in regard to what we may say and do

under these unparalleled circumstances. We are rather, for the time

being, to note the events transpiring than seek to control them. There

must be no needless turning of popular violence upon ourselves by any

false step of our own."

The circumspection, the tact, and sagacity which marked his conduct at

the beginning of the rebellion characterized it to the close of the war,

albeit at no time doing or saying aught to compromise his anti-slavery

principle of total and immediate emancipation. On the contrary, he

urged, early and late, upon Congress and the President the exercise of

the war power to put an end for ever to slavery. Radical Abolitionists

like Stephen S. Foster were for denying to the Administration

anti-slavery support and countenance, and for continuing to heap upon

the Government their denunciations until it placed itself "openly and

unequivocally on the side of freedom," by issuing the edict of

emancipation. Against this zeal without discretion Garrison warmly

protested. "I cannot say that I do not sympathize with the Government,"

said he, "as against Jefferson Davis and his piratical associates. There

is not a drop of blood in my veins, both as an Abolitionist and a peace

man, that does not flow with the Northern tide of sentiment; for I see,

in this grand uprising of the manhood of the North, which has been so

long groveling in the dust, a growing appreciation of the value of

liberty and free institutions, and a willingness to make any sacrifice

in their defence against the barbaric and tyrannical power which avows

its purpose, if it can, to crush them entirely out of existence. When

the Government shall succeed (if it shall succeed) in conquering a

peace, in subjugating the South, and shall undertake to carry out the

Constitution as of old, with all its pro-slavery compromises, then will

be my time to criticise, reprove, and condemn; then will be the time for

me to open all the guns that I can bring to bear upon it. But blessed be

God that 'covenant with death' has been annulled, and that 'agreement

with hell' no longer stands. I joyfully accept the fact, and leave all

verbal criticism until a more suitable opportunity."

But it must be confessed that at times during the struggle, Lincoln's

timidity and apparent indifference as to the fate of slavery, in his

anxiety to save the Union, weakened Garrison's confidence in him, and

excited his keenest apprehensions "at the possibility of the war

terminating without the utter extinction of slavery, by a new and more

atrocious compromise on the part of the North than any that has yet been

made." The pioneer therefore adjudged it prudent to get his battery into

position and to visit upon the President for particular acts, such as

the revocation of anti-slavery orders by sundry of his generals in the

field, and upon particular members of his Cabinet who were understood to

be responsible for the shuffling, hesitating action of the Government in

its relation to slavery, an effective fire of criticism and rebuke.

Nevertheless Mr. Garrison maintained toward the Government a uniform

tone of sympathy and moderation. "I hold," said he, in reply to

strictures of Mr. Phillips upon the President at the annual meeting of

the Massachusetts Society in 1862; "I hold that it is not wise for us to

be too microscopic in endeavoring to find disagreeable and annoying

things, still less to assume that everything is waxing worse and worse,

and that there is little or no hope." He himself was full of hope which

no shortcomings of the Government was able to quench. He was besides

beginning to understand the perplexities which beset the administration,

to appreciate the problem which confronted the great statesman who was

at the head of the nation. He was getting a clear insight into the

workings of Lincoln's mind, and into the causes which gave to his

political pilotage an air of timidity and indecision.

"Supposing Mr. Lincoln could answer to-night," continued the pioneer in

reply to his less patient and hopeful coadjutors, "and we should say to

him: 'Sir, with the power in your hands, slavery being the cause of the

rebellion beyond all controversy, why don't you put the trump of jubilee

to your lips, and proclaim universal freedom?'--possibly he might

answer: 'Gentlemen, I understand this matter quite as well as you do. I

do not know that I differ in opinion from you; but will you insure me

the support of a united North if I do as you bid me? Are all parties and

all sects at the North so convinced and so united on this point that

they will stand by the Government? If so, give me the evidence of it,

and I will strike the blow. But, gentlemen, looking over the entire

North, and seeing in all your towns and cities papers representing a

considerable, if not a formidable portion of the people, menacing and

bullying the Government in case it dared to liberate the slaves, even as

a matter of self-preservation, I do not feel that the hour has yet come

that will render it safe for the Government to take that step.' I am

willing to believe that something of this kind weighs in the mind of the

President and the Cabinet, and that there is some ground for hesitancy

as a mere matter of political expediency." This admirable and

discriminating support of the President finds another capital

illustration in weighty words of his in answer to animadversions of

Prof. Francis W. Newman, of England, directed against Mr. Lincoln. Says

Garrison: "In no instance, however, have I censured him (Lincoln) for

not acting upon the highest abstract principles of justice and humanity,

and disregarding his Constitutional obligations. His freedom to follow

his convictions of duty as an individual is one thing--as the President

of the United States, it is limited by the functions of his office, for

the people do not elect a President to play the part of reformer or

philanthropist, nor to enforce upon the nation his own peculiar ethical

or humanitary ideas without regard to his oath or their will."

Great indeed was the joy of the pioneer when President Lincoln on

January 1, 1863, issued his Emancipation Proclamation. The same

sagacious and statesmanlike handling of men and things distinguished his

conduct after the edict of freedom was made as before. When the question

of Reconstruction was broached in an administrative initiative in

Louisiana, the President gave great offence to the more radical members

of his party, and to many Abolitionists by his proposal to readmit

Louisiana to Statehood in the Union with no provision for the extension

of the suffrage to the negro. This exhibition of the habitual caution

and conservatism of Mr. Lincoln brought upon him a storm of criticism

and remonstrances, but not from Garrison. There was that in him which

appreciated and approved the evident disposition of the President to

make haste slowly in departing from the American principle of local

self-government even in the interest of liberty. Then, too, he had his

misgivings in relation to the virtue of the fiat method of transforming

chattels into citizens. "Chattels personal may be instantly translated

from the auction-block into freemen," he remarked in defence of the

administrative policy in the reconstruction of Louisiana, "but when were

they ever taken at the same time to the ballot-box, and invested with

all political rights and immunities? According to the laws of

development and progress it is not practicable.... Besides, I doubt

whether he has the Constitutional right to decide this matter. Ever

since the Government was organized, the right of suffrage has been

determined by each State in the Union for itself, so that there is no

uniformity in regard to it.

" ... In honestly seeking to preserve the Union, it is not for President

Lincoln to seek, by a special edict applied to a particular State or

locality, to do violence to a universal rule, accepted and acted upon

from the beginning till now by the States in their individual

sovereignty.... Nor, if the freed blacks were admitted to the polls by

Presidential fiat do I see any permanent advantage likely to be secured

by it; for, submitted to as a necessity at the outset, as soon as the

State was organized and left to manage its own affairs, the white

population with their superior intelligence, wealth, and power, would

unquestionably alter the franchise in accordance with their prejudices,

and exclude those thus summarily brought to the polls. Coercion would

gain nothing." A very remarkable prophecy, which has since been exactly

fulfilled in the Southern States. Garrison, however, in the subsequent

struggle between Congress and Mr. Lincoln's successor over this selfsame

point in its wider relation to all of the Southern States, took sides

against Andrew Johnson and in favor of the Congressional fiat method of

transforming chattels personal into citizens. The elimination of Abraham

Lincoln from, and the introduction of Andrew Johnson upon the National

stage at this juncture, did undoubtedly effect such a change of

circumstances, as to make the Congressional fiat method a political

necessity. It was distinctly the less of two evils which at the moment

was thrust upon the choice of the Northern people.

The same breadth and liberality of view, which marked his treatment of

Mr. Lincoln upon the subject of emancipation and of that of

reconstruction, marked his treatment also of other questions which the

suppression of the rebellion presented to his consideration. Although a

radical peace man, how just was his attitude toward the men and the

measures of the War for the Union. Nothing that he did evinced on his

part greater tact or toleration than his admirable behavior in this

respect. To his eldest son, George Thompson, who was no adherent of the

doctrine of non-resistance, and who was commissioned by Governor Andrew,

a second lieutenant in the Fifty-fifth Massachusetts Regiment, the

pioneer wrote expressing his regret that the young lieutenant had not

been able "to adopt those principles of peace which are so sacred and

divine to my soul, yet you will bear me witness that I have not laid a

straw in your way to prevent your acting up to your own highest

convictions of duty." Such was precisely his attitude toward the North

who, he believed, in waging war against the South for the maintenance of

the Union, was acting up to her own highest convictions of duty. And not

a straw would he place across her path, under those circumstances,

though every step bore witness to one of the most gigantic and

destructive wars in history.

Garrison did not have to wait for posthumous appreciation from his

countrymen. His steady and discriminating support of the Government, and

his ardent sympathy with the arms of the North won him appreciation in

his lifetime. Indeed, there came to him, if not popularity, something

closely akin to it during the war. His visit to the capital in June,

1864, well illustrates the marvelous changes which had taken place in

the Union touching himself and his cause. On his way to Washington the

pioneer stopped over at Baltimore, which he had not revisited for

thirty-four years, and where the Republican Convention, which

renominated Lincoln was in session. He watched the proceedings from the

gallery, and witnessed with indescribable emotions the enthusiastic

demonstrations of joy with which the whole body of delegates greeted the

radical anti-slavery resolution of the Convention. To the reformer it

was "a full indorsement of all the Abolition fanaticism and

incendiarism" with which he had been branded for years. The jail where

he had been held a prisoner for seven weeks, like the evil which he had

denounced, was gone, and a new one stood in its place, which knew not

Garrison. In the court-house where he was tried and sentenced he was

received by a United States judge as an illustrious visitor. Judge Bond

hunted up the old indictment against the junior editor of the _Genius of

Universal Emancipation_, where it had lain for a generation, during

which that guiltless prisoner had started a movement which had shaken

the nation by its mighty power, and slavery out of it. "Eight or nine of

the original jurymen who gave the verdict against Mr. Garrison are still

living," wrote Theodore Tilton, at the time, to the _Independent_, "and

Judge Bond jocosely threatened to summon them all into Court, that Mr.

Garrison might forgive them in public."

At Washington the pioneer's reception seemed to him like a dream. And no

wonder. He was heartily received by President Lincoln and Secretary

Stanton. He was accorded the most marked attentions on the floor of both

branches of Congress. On every side there rose up witnesses to the

vastness of the revolution which had taken place, and to the fact that

the great Abolitionist was no longer esteemed an enemy of the Republic

but one of its illustrious citizens. This was evinced in a signal and

memorable manner a little later when the National Government extended to

him an invitation to visit Fort Sumter as its guest on the occasion of

the re-raising over it of the Stars and Stripes. He went, and so also

went George Thompson, his lifelong friend and coadjutor, who was the

recipient of a similar invitation from the Secretary of War.

This visit of Mr. Garrison, taken in all its dramatic features, is more

like a chapter of fiction, with its strange and improbable incidents and

situations, than a story of real life. The pioneer entered Georgia and

trod the streets of Savannah, whose legislature thirty-three years

before had set a price upon his head. In Charleston he witnessed the

vast ruin which the war had wrought, realized how tremendous had been

the death-struggle between Freedom and Slavery, and saw everywhere he

turned that slavery was beaten, was dead in its proud, rebellious

center. Thousands upon thousands of the people whose wrongs he had made

his own, whose woes he had carried in his soul for thirty-five years,

greeted him, their deliverer, in all stages of joy and thanksgiving.

They poured out at his feet their overflowing love and gratitude. They

covered him with flowers, bunches of jessamines, and honeysuckles and

roses in the streets of Charleston, hard by the grave where Calhoun lay

buried. "'Only listen to that in Charleston streets!' exclaimed

Garrison, on hearing the band of one of the black regiments playing the

air of 'Old John Brown', and we both broke into tears," relates Rev.

Theodore L. Cuyler, who stood by the side of the pioneer that April

morning under the spire of St. Michael's church.

"The Government has its hold upon the throat of the monster, slavery,"

Mr. Garrison assured an audience of nearly four thousand freedmen, "and

is strangling the life out of it." It was even so. Richmond had fallen,

and Lee had surrendered. The early and total collapse of the rebellion

was impending. The Government was, indeed, strangling the life out of it

and out of slavery, its cause and mainspring. The monster had, however,

a crowning horror to add to a long list of horrors before fetching its

last gasp. The assassination of President Lincoln was the dying blow of

slavery, aimed through him at the Union which he had maintained.

Appalling as was the deed, it was vain, for the Union was saved, and

liberty forever secured to the new-born nation. As Garrison remarked at

the tomb of Calhoun, on the morning that Lincoln died, "Down into a

deeper grave than this slavery has gone, and for it there is no

resurrection."

William Lloyd Garrison, the Abolitionist · 第 20 / 21 章