Boyle and the Company for the Propagation of the Gospel among the
Indians, signed by William Stoughton, Joseph Dudley, Peter Bulkley, and
Thomas Hinckley.
[Illustration: AUTOGRAPHS CONNECTED WITH THE INDIAN BIBLE.]
Eliot was assisted in this second edition by John Cotton, of Plymouth,
son of the Boston minister; and the type was in part set for both
editions by James Printer, an Indian taught to do the work. There is
a notice of Boyle by C. O. Thompson in the _Amer. Antiq. Soc. Proc._,
April, 1882, p. 54; and one of the Society for Propagating the Gospel,
by G. D. Scull, in the _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, April, 1882, p.
157. Cf. Sabin’s _Dictionary_, viii. 552. A portion of the original
manuscript records of the society (1655-1685) were described in
Stevens’s _Bibliotheca Historica_ (1870), no. 1,399, and brought in the
sale $265. The bibliographical history of the Indian Bible is given in
Dr. Trumbull’s chapter in the _Memorial History of Boston_, as before
noted.]
[602] A copy is in the Carter-Brown Library, and another in the
possession of the writer.
[603] See the list of Norton’s and Pynchon’s publications in Sabin’s
_Dictionary_.
[604] _A journal of the Transactions and Occurrences in the Settlement
of Massachusetts and the other New-England Colonies, from the year 1630
to 1644.... Now first published from a correct copy of the original
manuscript._ Hartford, 1790.
[605] _The History of New England from 1630 to 1649. From his original
manuscripts. With Notes to illustrate the Civil and Ecclesiastical
concerns, the Geography, Settlement, and Institutions of the Country,
and the Lives and Manners of the principal Planters._ By James Savage.
Boston, 1825-26. 2 vols. New ed., with additions and corrections.
Boston, 1853. 2 vols.
[606] [For other details and references see _Memorial History of
Boston_, i. p. xvii.—ED.]
[607] A curious bibliographical question is connected with a later
issue of the volume as bound up with several of the Gorges tracts,
for the discussion of which see the Introduction to Mr. W. F. Poole’s
valuable edition of Johnson’s book, Andover, 1867, pp. li-vi; with
which cf. _North American Review_, January, 1868, pp. 323-328; and
_Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, June, 1881, pp. 432-35. [Geo. H. Moore
printed some strictures on Poole’s edition in _Historical Magazine_,
xiii. 87. Cf. Dexter’s _Congregationalism_; _Carter-Brown Catalogue_,
ii. 771, 851; and other references in _Memorial History of Boston_, i.
463.—ED.]
[608] It was republished in fragmentary parts in several volumes of the
Massachusetts Historical Society’s _Collections_, second series.
[609] It is reprinted in 4 _Mass. Hist. Coll._, vol. ii., from a copy
of the rare original in the Carter-Brown Library.
[610] Charles Lamb speaks of the book in his _Elia_ under “A Quaker
Meeting.”
[611] [The literature of the Quaker controversy is extensive and
intricate in its bearings.
[Illustration]
It can best be followed in Mr. J. Smith’s _Catalogue of Friends’
Books_, and in his _Anti-Quakeriana_. Dr. Dexter’s _Congregationalism_,
and the _Brinley_ and _Carter-Brown Catalogues_ will assist the
student. The 1703 edition of Bishope’s _New England Judged_, abridged
in some ways and enlarged in others, contains also John Whiting’s
_Truth and Innocencey Defended_, which is an answer in part to portions
of Cotton Mather’s _Magnalia_; cf. also the note in _Memorial History
of Boston_, i. 187. There were a few of the prominent men at the
time who dared to protest boldly against the unwise actions of the
magistrates; and of such none were more prominent than James Cudworth,
of Plymouth Colony, and Robert Pike, of Salisbury. The conduct of the
latter has been commemorated in James S. Pike’s _New Puritan_, New
York, 1879.—ED.
[612] For their titles see Thomas’s _History of Printing_, 2d ed.
vol. ii. pp. 313-315; the bibliographical list in Dr. H. M. Dexter’s
_Congregationalism_, whose work may also be consulted for a history
of the subject itself; Mather’s _Magnalia_, v. 64 _et seq._; Upham’s
_Ratio Disiplinæ_, p. 223; Trumbull’s _Connecticut_, chaps. xiii. and
xix. of vol. i.; Hutchinson, i. 223-24; Wisner’s _History of the Old
South Church in Boston_, pp. 5-7; Bacon’s _Discourses_, pp. 139-141.
[613] [Mr. Tuckerman revised his notes and introduction in a reprint,
published by Veazie in Boston in 1865. The _Voyages_, which had been
reprinted in 3 _Mass. Hist. Coll._, iii., was also reissued in 1865 in
a companion volume to the _Rarities_, the text being corrected from a
copy of the “second addition,” 1675, in Harvard College Library. The
earlier book usually brings £3 or £4, the later one from £5 to £10.
Both are in the _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, ii. 1,080, 1,104. Cf. Sabin,
ix. 340; Menzies, 1,104, 1,105.—ED.]
[614] [It is further characterized in Vol. IV., chap. x.—ED.]
[615] There are at least eight titles in this interesting list:—
1. _The Present State of New England with respect to the Indian War_,
1675 (19 pages), purporting to be by a merchant of Boston.
2. _A Briefe and True Narration of the late Wars_, 1675 (8 pages); cf.
Sabin, vol. xiii. nos. 52,616, 52,638.
3. _A Continuation of the State of New England_, 1676 (20 pages).
4. _A New and Further Narrative of the State of New England_, 1676 (14
pages), signed N. T.
5. _A True Account of the most considerable Occurences that have hapned
in the War_, 1676 (14 pages).
6. _New England’s Tears for her present Miseries_, 1676 (14 pages).
7. _News from New England_, 1676 (6 pages). Sabin only records one
copy; and of a second edition, 1676, there are copies in the British
Museum and Carter-Brown libraries.
8. _The War in New England visibly Ended_, 1677 (6 pages), containing
news of the death of Philip, brought by Caleb More, master of a vessel
newly arrived from Rhode Island.
[These tracts are all in the _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, vol. ii.,
and several are in Mr. Deane’s collection, and in Harvard College
Library. Rich supposed that nos. 1, 3, and 4 were written by the same
person. Five of them were reprinted by S. G. Drake in his _Old Indian
Chronicle_ in 1836, and again in 1867, with new notes; and no. 7 was
reprinted in 1850 by Drake, and in 1865 by Woodward. Sabin, xiii. 321,
322.
These tracts are priced at twelve and eighteen shillings, and at
similarly high sums, even in Rich’s catalogues of fifty years ago.
Whenever they have occurred in sales of late years they have proved the
occasion of much competition and unusual prices. Cf. Stevens’s _Hist.
Coll._, i. 1523, 1524.
Another contemporary account by a Rhode Island Quaker, as it is
thought, John Easton, was printed at Albany in 1858, as a _Narrative of
the Causes which led to Philip’s War_. Cf. Palfrey, iii. 180; Field,
_Indian Bibliography_, p. 479.
Mr. Drake, whose name is closely associated with our Indian history,
was one of the foremost of American antiquaries for many years. There
is a memoir of him by W. B. Trask in _Potter’s American Monthly_, v.
729; and another in the _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, July, 1863, by
J. H. Sheppard, also separately issued. In 1874 he printed _Narrative
Remarks_, anonymously, embodying some personal grievances and notes of
his career, not pleasantly expressed. For his publications, see Sabin’s
_Dictionary_, v. 526, and Field’s _Indian Bibliography_, p. 452.—ED.]
[Illustration]
[616] John Foster had now set up a press in Boston, for the history of
which and its successors see _Memorial History of Boston_, i. 453.
[617] [Rich in 1832, no. 368, priced it, either edition, at eighteen
shillings. It was a quarto of 51 pages. Cf. _Carter-Brown Catalogue_,
ii. 1,150; Field’s _Indian Bibliography_, 1,022; _Brinley Catalogue_,
948, 5,531. It has of late years brought about $80. S. G. Drake
included this and the section of the _Magnalia_ on the war in his
_History of King Philip’s War_, 1862. Another book by Mather, _A
Relation of the Troubles which have hapned in New England_, etc., was
also printed in 1676, and traces the Indian wars from 1641, including
the causes of Philip’s War. Drake also reprinted this in 1864, as the
_Early History of New England_.—ED.]
[618] [King Philip’s War, which was but the beginning of a long
series of wars which devastated the frontiers, may be said properly
to end with the treaty of Casco, April 12, 1678, which is preserved
in the _Massachusetts Archives_; though a continuation of hostilities
intervened till the treaty of Portsmouth, Sept. 8, 1685. Cf. Belknap’s
_New Hampshire_, p. 348.—ED.]
[619] [Rich priced this book in 1832 (no. 375) at £1 10_s._,—an
extraordinary high sum for those days. I have seen the London edition
priced recently at £26, and $75; and the Boston edition in the Menzies
sale (no. 990) brought $200. It was reprinted in New England at least
six times (all spurious editions) between 1775 and 1814 (_Brinley
Catalogue_, 5,523, etc.; _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, ii. 1,167, 1,168,
1,170); and S. G. Drake brought out an annotated edition in two volumes
in 1865. Cf. _Hist. Mag._, i. 252, 348; ii. 62.
[Illustration]
Perhaps the most popular book touching the events of the war was one
which was not published till 1716, from notes of Colonel Benjamin
Church, and compiled by that hero’s son, Thomas Church, and called
_Entertaining Passages relating to Philip’s War_. It is an extremely
scarce book, and has brought $400. (_Brinley Catalogue_, no. 383;
Sabin, _Dictionary_, no. 12,996; _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, iii. 293.)
A second edition, Newport, 1772, is said to have been edited by Dr.
Stiles, but it is not supposed he was privy to the fraud practised in
that edition of presenting an engraving of the portrait of Charles
Churchill, the English poet, with the addition of a powder-horn slung
over the shoulder, as a likeness of Church. (Cf. _Mass. Hist. Soc.
Proc._, xix. 243; also iii. 293; and _Hist. Mag._, December, 1868, pp.
27, 271.) Drake first reissued it in 1827, and made stereotype plates
of the book, and they have been much used since. He continued to use
the spurious portrait as late as 1857. Sabin, iv. 12,996; Brinley, no.
5,514. Dr. H. M. Dexter did all that is necessary for the text in his
edition (two volumes) in 1865-67. Another class of books growing out
of the war during its long continuance, particularly at the eastward,
is what collectors know as “captivities,” the most famous of which
is, perhaps, that of Mrs. Rowlandson, of Lancaster, printed in 1682.
The _Brinley Catalogue_, nos. 469, 5,540, etc., groups them, and they
are scattered through Field’s _Indian Bibliography_. The _Brinley
Catalogue_ also groups the works on the Indian wars of New England
(nos. 382, etc.); and a condensed exposition of the authorities on
Philip’s War will be found in the _Memorial History of Boston_, i. 327.
The local aspects of the war involve a very large amount of citation
and reference. What are known as the “Narragansett Townships” grew
out of the war. Before the troops marched from Dedham Plain, Dec. 9,
1675, they were promised “a gratuity of land beside their wages,”
and not till 1737 were the promises fulfilled, when 840 claimants or
their representatives met on Boston Common, and dividing themselves
into seven groups, they took possession of seven townships in Maine,
Massachusetts, and New Hampshire, granted by the General Court. _New
England Historical and Genealogical Register_, 1862, pp. 143, 216.—ED.
[620] For reference to the recovery of the preface and other missing
lines, see _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, xvi. 12, 38, 100; also, cf. i.
243; ii. 421; iii. 321. Hubbard, besides the above aid, had a large
number of official documents which he incorporated into his _History_.
Cf. Sabin, _Dictionary_, viii. 499; Field, _Indian Bibliography_, no.
730.
[621] [Mr. Whitmore also epitomized the history with references in
the _Memorial History of Boston_, ii. chap. i. Cf. also _Carter-Brown
Catalogue_, ii. 1,351, 1,370, 1,372, 1,388, 1,398, 1,400, 1,403, 1,408,
1,420, 1,421.—ED.]
[622] A copy of Dudley’s commission (Oct. 8, 1685) has been recently
printed in 5 _Mass. Hist. Soc. Coll._, ix. 145.
[623] [Dr. N. B. Shurtleff, an eager Boston antiquary, died in that
city, Oct. 17, 1874, and his library was sold at auction, Nov. 30,
1875, etc.—ED.]
[624] The preface of the _Memorial History_ enumerates the sources of
Boston’s history.
[625] [A law was placed on the statute book of Massachusetts in 1854,
by which towns may legally appropriate money for publishing their
histories. The authorities on the town system of New England are cited
in W. E. Foster’s _Reference Lists_, July, 1882.—ED.]
[626] [The different keys to the genealogy of New England are indicated
in _Memorial History of Boston_, ii. Introduction.—ED.]
[627] “Maine” took its name probably from the early designation, by
the sailors and fishermen, of the main land—that is, “the main,”—in
distinction from the numerous islands on the coast. See Weymouth’s
“Voyage,” in 3 _Mass. Hist. Coll._, viii. 132, 151; Palfrey, i. 525;
_Amer. Antiq. Soc. Proc._, i. 371. The earliest use of the name,
officially employed, that I have met with, is in the grant to Gorges
and Mason of Aug. 10, 1622, which recites that the patentees, “by
consent of the President and Council, intend to name it the _Province
of Maine_.” See the _Popham Memorial Volume_, p. 122. This grant was
never made use of, but the name was inserted in the royal charter to
Gorges of April 3, 1639, which secured its future use. Sullivan’s
_Maine_, Appendix, 399. The territory had been previously included in
the European designations of Baccalaos and Norumbega. The Indian name
was Mavooshen. See Purchas, iv., 1873; _Maine Hist. Coll._, i. 16, 17.
[628] These manuscripts were made use of by Dr. Belknap in writing his
_History of New Hampshire_, and are now all printed in the _Provincial
Papers_ of that State, vol. i., 1867, edited by the late Nathaniel
Bouton.
[Illustration]
The grant of Aug. 10, 1622, is printed in Poor’s _Ferdinando Gorges_,
from the _Colonial Entry Book_, p. 101, no. 59. An account of the
voyage of the barque “Warwick,” in 1630, which brought Captain Neal
to be governor for the Company, is given in _N. E. Hist. and Geneal.
Reg._, 1867, p. 223.
[629] Citations are made from them by Folsom in his _History of Saco
and Biddeford_, pp. 49-52. The original manuscript is among the old
county of York records at Alfred. The commission to Sir Ferdinando
Gorges as governor of New England, 1637, is printed in Poor’s _Gorges_,
p. 127. For his deed to Edgecombe, 1637, see _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._,
ii. 74.
[630] See _Massachusetts Archives_, Miscellanies, i. 130.
[631] These old Maine records have all been removed to the county town
of Alfred, and they have never been printed. Extracts from time to time
have been published, as by Folsom above, and by Willis in vol. i. of
his _History of Portland_, who gives a description, from Judge David
Sewall, of the manner in which the original records were made and kept.
The charter of incorporation of Acomenticus as a town, April 10, 1641,
and the charter of Gorgeana as a city, March 1, 1642, were among the
papers which Hazard found at old York, and printed in his _Collection_,
vol. i. Cf. “Sir Robert Carr in Maine,” in _Magazine of American
History_, September, 1882, p. 623; and a paper on Gorgeana in _N. E.
Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1881, p. 42.
[632] [Cf. _Historical Magazine_, ii. 286, and Note B to chapter vi. of
the present volume.—ED.]
[633] [Mr. Somerby, a native of Massachusetts, who died in London
in 1872, did much during a long sojourn in England to further the
interests of American antiquaries and genealogists. Cf. _N. E. Hist.
and Geneal. Reg._, 1874, p. 340. Colonel Joseph L. Chester also for
many years filled a prominent place in similar work in England, till
his death in 1882. A portrait and notice of him by John T. Latting is
in the _New York Genealogical and Biographical Record_, 1882; also
issued separately: Cf. _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, January, 1883,
p. 106.—ED.]
[634] [The deed to Usher as agent of Massachusetts, in 1677, and his
conveyance to Massachusetts are at the State House in Boston. Cf.
_Maine Hist. Coll._, ii. 257; _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, xi. 201.—ED.]
[635] Mr. Folsom, a graduate of Harvard in 1822, was at this time
living in Saco. He subsequently removed to New York, became an active
member of the New York Historical Society, was minister at the Hague,
and died in Rome, Italy, in 1869.
[636] Special mention should perhaps be made of the enumeration of
Maine titles in the _Brinley Catalogue_ no. 2,571, etc., and of several
town histories published since Mr. Willis wrote his Catalogue, which
in their treatment go back to the early period, namely, _History of
Augusta_, by James W. North; _History of Brunswick_, etc., by G.
A. Wheeler and H. W. Wheeler, 1878; _History of Castine_, by G. A.
Wheeler, Bangor, 1875; _History of Bristol, Bremen, and Pemaquid_, by
John Johnston, Albany, 1873; _History of Ancient Sheepscot and New
Castle_, by David Q. Cushman, Bath, 1882. Most of the local historical
literature can be picked out of F. B. Perkins’s _Check-List of American
Local History_.
A volume entitled _Papers relating to Pemaquid_, collected from the
archives at Albany by Franklin B. Hough, was printed at Albany in 1856.
They relate to the condition of that part of the country when under
the colony of New York, and are of great value. Cf. also Mr. Hough’s
contributions in the _Maine Hist. Coll._, v. and vii. 127. Pemaquid as
a centre of historical interest is also illustrated in J. W. Thornton’s
_Ancient Pemaquid_; in Johnston’s papers in his _History of Bristol_,
etc.; in the Popham_ Memorial Volume_, p. 263; in _Maine Hist. Coll._,
vol. viii.; Vinton’s _Giles Memorial_, 1864; _Historical Magazine_, i.
132; _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1871, p. 131. [See also Vol. IV.
of this History.—ED.]
[637] [The early history of this society is told by Mr. Willis in an
address printed in their _Collections_, vol. iv. Cf. also Note B at the
end of chapter vi. of the present volume.—ED.]
[638] This collection, entitled _America painted to the Life_, passes
by the name of the _Gorges Tracts_. There are copies in Harvard College
Library, and noted in the _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, ii. 127; _Brinley
Catalogue_, nos. 308, 2,640 ($225.) Cf. Sabin’s _Dictionary_, vii.
348; Rich’s _Catalogue_, no. 314; _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, xviii.
432, and xix. 128; Stevens’s _Historical Collections_, vol. i. no.
247. The relations of Gorges and Champernoun are discussed by C. W.
Tuttle in _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1874, p. 404. See further on
Champernoun in Ibid., 1873, p. 147; 1874, pp. 75, 318, 403. There is an
account of Gorges’ tomb at St. Bordeaux in the _Magazine of American
History_, August, 1882; and notes on his pedigree, in _N. E. Hist. and
Geneal. Reg._, 1861, p. 17; 1864, p. 287; 1872, p. 381; 1877, pp. 42,
44, 112.—ED.
[639] [Captain Christopher Levett. His account was published in London
in 1628. The reprint in 3 _Mass. Hist. Coll._, viii. 164, was made from
a copy got in England by Sparks. The Maine Historical Society reprinted
it in their _Collections_, ii. 73 (1847); and the copy in the New York
Historical Society’s Library was then considered to be unique. The
_Huth Catalogue_, iii. 843, and _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, ii. no. 338,
show original copies.—ED.]
[640] [The principal contestants may be thus divided:—
_Pro_,—_New Hampshire Historical Collections_, i.; Bell’s
_Wheelwright_; cf. _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1869, p. 65.
_Con_,—Farmer’s _Belknap_; Savage’s _Winthrop_; Palfrey’s _New
England_; and, besides Mr. Deane, the recorded opinions of Dr. Bouton,
Mr. C. W. Tuttle, Mr. J. A. Vinton; cf. _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._,
1868, p. 479; 1874, pp. 343, 477; and _Historical Magazine_, i. 57; and
also a letter of Colonel Chester in the _Register_, 1868, p. 350.
The deed is printed in the _Provincial Papers_, i. 56. Cotton Mather’s
original letter regarding it, dated March 3, 1708, is noted in the
_Brinley Catalogue_, no. 1,329. Belknap has printed it, and it is also
in the _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1862, p. 349.—ED.]
[641] Mason made no use of this grant; and no use had been made of his
grant of Mariana, of March 9, 1621/22, and that to him and Gorges of
Aug. 10, 1622; Hubbard’s _New England_, p. 614.
[642] [Governor Bell discovered in 1870 what is known as the Hilton or
Squamscott patent, of March 12, 1629, and it is printed in the _N. E.
Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1870, p. 264; it was found not to agree as to
its bounds with Piscataqua patent. Jenness, in his _Notes_, contends
that Wiggin set up the title of Massachusetts to the territory under
the 1628/29 charter. It was the conclusion of Mr. C. W. Tuttle (a
studious explorer of New Hampshire history, who died July 18, 1881; cf.
_Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, xix. 2, 11) that Bloody Point, being included
in both grants, became the cause of the trouble between Neale and
Wiggin, as told by Hubbard.—ED.]
[643] Mason’s will, or a long extract from it, may be seen in Hazard,
i. 397-399, dated Nov. 26, 1635; also in _Provincial Papers_. These
papers last named are a publication of the State. The Rev. Dr.
Nathaniel Bouton, between 1867 and 1876, completed ten volumes of
Papers. They contain nothing before 1631; few from 1631 to 1686. Most
of the original papers between 1641 and 1679 are in the _Massachusetts
Archives_. The papers of interest in the present connection are in
vols. i. and ii. The series has since been resumed under another
editor, with the publication (1882) of the first part (A to F) of
documents relating to towns, 1680-1800. Very few of the papers,
however, are before 1700. Colonel A. H. Hoyt’s “Notes, Historical and
Bibliographical, on the Laws of New Hampshire,” are in _Amer. Antiq.
Soc. Proc._, April, 1876. Like most of the patents issued at the grand
division, Mason’s grant included ten thousand acres more of land on the
southeast part of Sagadahoc, “from henceforth to be called by the name
of Massonia.”
[644] [John Farmer (1789-1838) and Jacob B. Moore (1797-1853). Each
did much for New Hampshire history. For an account of Farmer, see _N.
E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, i. 12, 15. He published a first volume
(Dover, 1831) of a projected new edition of Belknap’s _History of New
Hampshire_, from a copy “having the author’s last corrections.” Moore
was the father of the well-known historical student, Dr. George H.
Moore, of the Lenox Library.—ED.]
[645] [Cf. C. K. Adams, _Manual of Historical Literature_, p. 549.
Mention has been made elsewhere of the Belknap Papers; cf. _Mass. Hist.
Soc. Proc._, March, 1858.—ED.]
[646] [The reports of the Adjutant-General of the State, 1866 and 1868,
contained Mr. Chandler E. Potter’s _Military History of New Hampshire_,
from 1623 to 1861, issued separately at Concord in 1869. The histories
by Whiton (1834) and Barstow (1853) are of minor importance.] There
are many valuable histories of separate towns in New Hampshire, and I
cannot do better than refer to the “Bibliography of New Hampshire,”
in Norton’s _Literary Letter_, new series, no. i. pp. 8-30, by S. C.
Eastman. [A current periodical, _The Granite Monthly_, is devoting
much space to New Hampshire history; cf. Sabin, vol. xiii. no. 37,486,
etc.—ED.]
[647] J. Hammond Trumbull, in _Conn. Hist. Soc. Coll._, ii. 8. [Dr.
Trumbull has compassed a large part of the field of the Indian
nomenclature of Connecticut in his _Indian Names of Places: ... in
Connecticut, etc._, Hartford, 1881. The fortunes of the natives of this
colony have been traced in J. W. De Forest’s _History of the Indians of
Connecticut_ (with a map of 1630), of which there have been successive
editions in 1850, 1853, and 1871. Of Uncas, the most famous of the
Mohegan chiefs, there is a pedigree, as made out in 1679, recorded in
the _Colony Records_, Deeds, iii. 312, and printed in _N. E. Hist. and
Geneal. Reg._, 1856, p. 227. The will of his son Joshua is in Ibid.,
1859, p. 235. An agreement which Uncas made in 1681 with the whites is
in the _Public Records_, i. 309, and in _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, x.
16. The warfare in 1642 between Uncas and Miantonomo, the chief of the
Narragansetts, and which ended with the latter’s death in captivity,
the English approving, is described by Winthrop and Hubbard; also in
Trumbull’s _Connecticut_, chap. 7; Arnold’s _Rhode Island_, chap. 4;
Palfrey’s _New England_, vol. ii. chap. 3; and it was the subject of
an historical address in 1842 by William L. Stone, called _Uncas and
Miantonomo_.—ED.]
[648] _Massachusetts Colonial Records_, i. 170.
[649] See _Connecticut Colonial Records_, i. 4.
[650] J. Hammond Trumbull, as above, p. 15.
[651] _New Haven Records._
[652] [Block, in 1614, had been the first to explore the river for the
Dutch; and both O’Callaghan (_New Netherland_, i. 169) and Brodhead
(New York, i. 235) set forth the prior right of the Dutch; cf. _N. E.
Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, vi. 368.—ED.]
[653] [Roger Wolcott celebrated Winthrop’s agency in London, in 1662,
in a long poem, which was printed in Wolcott’s _Poetical Meditations_,
London, 1725, and in _Mass. Hist. Soc. Coll._ Cf. _Carter-Brown
Catalogue_, iii. 369; Brinley Catalogue, no. 2,134.—ED.]
[654] It had been printed by Trumbull in 1797, in the Appendix to the
first edition of his _History_, i. 528-533; and is repeated in the
second edition, 1818; cf. Dr. J. H. Trumbull’s _Historical Notes on the
Constitutions of Connecticut_, 1639-1878, published in 1873. Hinman
published a collection of _Letters of the Kings of England to the
Successive Governors_ (1635-1749).
[655] Douglass’s _Summary_, ii. 160; Neal’s _New England_, 2d ed., i.
163; Trumbull’s 2d ed. 1818, i. 21; Hubbard, p. 310.
[656] Trumbull, i. 28, from manuscripts of President Clap. This old
Connecticut patent has always been a mystery. Some of the colonists
of the Winthrop emigration to Massachusetts in 1630 were unfavorably
impressed on their arrival with the place selected for a plantation.
The sad mortality of the preceding winter was appalling, and they began
to cast their thoughts on a more southerly spot than Massachusetts
Bay. In a letter of John Humfrey, written from London, Dec. 9, 1636,
in reply to one just received from his brother-in-law, Isaac Johnson,
from the colony, he says, in speaking of Mr. Downing: “He is the only
man for Council that is heartily ours in the town; and yet, unless you
settle upon a good river and in a less snowy and cold place, I can see
no great edge on him to come unto us.” Further on he says, “My Lord
of Warwick will take a patent of that place you writ of for himself,
and so we may be bold to do there as if it were our own.” (4 _Mass.
Hist. Coll._, vi. 3, 4.) No further hint is given as to the location of
Warwick’s intended grant, and we have no contemporaneous record of any
patent having been taken by him at this time or later. The Earl was a
great friend of the Puritans. It was through him that the Massachusetts
patent was obtained; and the patent to the people of Plymouth was
signed by him alone, but in the name of the Council, and sealed with
their seal.
The title to Connecticut was contested. On the grand division of 1635,
James, Marquis, afterward Duke, of Hamilton, received for his share
the territory between the Connecticut and Narragansett rivers, and
a copy of his feoffment was cited by Chalmers, as on record bearing
date April 22, 1635, that being the date which all the grants of that
final division bore. From a copy on the Connecticut files Mr. R. R.
Hinman, Secretary of State, published the deed in a volume of ancient
documents, at Hartford, in 1836. On the Restoration the heirs of the
Duke, in a petition to the King, asked to “be restored to their just
right,” and their claim was, in 1664, laid by the King’s commissioners
before the Connecticut authorities. These in their answer set up, in
the first place, the prior grant of Lord Say and Sele and others, which
Connecticut, as they alleged, had “purchased at a dear rate,” and which
had been recently ratified and confirmed by the King in their new
charter; then, secondly, a conquest from the natives; and, thirdly,
they claimed thirty years’ peaceable possession (Trumbull, i. 524,
530). At a period still later, the Earl of Arran, a grandson, applied
to King William for a hearing; and when in a formal manner several
patents were exhibited on the part of Connecticut, the Earl’s final
reply was, “that when they produced a grant from the Plymouth Council
to the Earl of Warwick, it should have an answer.” (Chalmers, pp.
299-301; Trumbull, i. 524.)
Some entries in the recently recovered records of the Council for New
England tend to deepen the suspicion that the Earl of Warwick never
received the alleged grant from that body. It is true that the records
as preserved are not entire, and do not cover the year 1630, and for
the year 1631 they begin at November 4. But some later entries are very
significant. Under date of June 21, 1632, which is three months after
the date of the grant to Lord Say and Sele and associates, is this
entry: “The Secretary is to bring, against the next meeting, a rough
draft in paper of a patent for the E. of Warwick, from the river of the
Narrigants 10 leagues westward. Sir Ferd. Gorges will forthwith give
particular directions for the said patent.” At the next meeting, June
26, “The rough draft of a patent for the E. of Warwick was now read.
His Lordship, upon hearing the same, gave order that the grant should
be unto Rob. Lord Rich and his associates, A, B, etc. And it was agreed
by the Council that the limits of the said patent should be 30 English
miles westward, and 50 miles into the land northward, provided that it
did not prejudice any other patent formerly granted.” A committee was
appointed to take further order respecting this patent, and there is no
evidence that it was ever perfected or issued. This proposed grant, it
will be seen, covered in part the same territory previously included in
the grant above cited to Lord Say, Lord Brook, Lord Rich, and others by
the Earl of Warwick himself.
Three days afterward some very singular orders were adopted by the
Council, indicating that there had been a serious disagreement with the
Earl, or that a feeling akin to suspicion, of which the Earl was the
object, had found a lodgment in that body. The Earl being president,
the meetings for some years had been held at “Warwick House in
Holborne.” At a meeting on the 29th of June, at which the Earl was not
present, “It was agreed that the E. of Warwick should be entreated to
direct a course for finding out what patents have been granted for New
England.” (Did not the Council keep a record of their grants?) Also,
“The Lord Great Chamberlain and the rest of the Council now present
sent their clerk unto the E. of Warwick for the Council’s great seal,
it being in his Lordship’s keeping.” Answer was brought that as soon as
his man Williams came in he would send it. It was then voted that the
meetings of the Council, which for some time, as I have already said,
had been held at Warwick House, should hereafter be held at Captain
Mason’s House, in Fenchurch Street. But the seal was not then sent, and
during the next five months two other formal applications were made for
it. In the mean time and thence after the records indicate the Earl’s
absence from the meetings, and finally Lord Gorges was chosen President
of the Council in his place.
The patent to Lord Say and Sele, it may be added, was never formally
transferred to Connecticut. In the agreement of 1644/45 Fenwick
conveyed the fort and lands on the river, and promised to convey the
jurisdiction of all the lands between Narragansett River and Saybrook
Fort, “if it come into his power,”—which he seems never to have done,
though the authorities of Connecticut claimed that they had paid him
for it. For a long time the Connecticut authorities appear to have
had no copy of this patent, for they were often challenged to exhibit
it, and were not able to do so; though they say that a copy was shown
to the commissioners when the confederation of the colonies was
formed,—then of course in the possession of Fenwick; and in 1648 it
is referred to as having been recently seen. (Hazard, ii. 120, 123.)
A transcript of this patent was found in London by John Winthrop,
among the papers of Governor Hopkins, who died there in 1658. See
_Connecticut Colonial Records_, pp. 268, 568, 573, 574.
[657] First edition, vol. i. Appendix v. and vi. See also Ibid., i.
149, 507-510, edition of 1818, with which compare _Connecticut Colonial
Records_, pp. 568, 573, 585.
[658] Vol. i. p. 306; cf. Trumbull, i. 110; Hutchinson, i. 100, 101.
[659] Vol. i. pp. 77-80, 509-563, 1-384. The twelve Capital Laws of the
Connecticut Colony, established in 1642, were taken almost literally
from the Body of Liberties of Massachusetts, established in 1641. The
preamble to the code of 1650, the paragraph following it, and many, if
not all, of the laws were taken from the Massachusetts Book of Laws
published in 1649. A copy of the constitution of 1639 was prefixed to
the Code. This was first printed in a small volume in 1822 at Hartford,
by Silas Andrus, called _The Code of 1650, being a Compilation of the
Earliest Laws and Orders of the General Court of Connecticut; also,
the Constitution, or Civil Compact, entered into and adopted by the
Towns of Windsor, Hartford, and Weathersfield, in 1638-39, to which is
added some Extracts from the Laws and Judicial Proceedings of New Haven
Colony commonly called Blue Laws_. There was an edition at Hartford in
1828, 1830, 1838, from the same plates; and in 1861 there appeared at
Philadelphia _A Collection of the Earliest Statutes, Edited with an
Introduction_, by Samuel W. Smucker.
[660] Cf. also Trumbull, i. chap. viii.; Caulkins, _New London_, pp.
27-50.
[661] Vol. i. pp. 259, 260, 404, 405.
[662] Vol. i. 1, _et seq._; cf. Trumbull, i. chap. vi.; Hubbard, chap.
xlii. See also Davenport’s _Discourse about Civil Government in a New
Plantation_, Cambridge, 1663, probably written at this early period;
Leonard Bacon, _Thirteen Historical Discourses_, New Haven, 1839; and
Professor J. L. Kingsley, _Historical Discourse_, New Haven, 1838.
[663] [Of Governor Eaton, the first governor of New Haven, there is a
memoir by J. B. Moore in 2 _N. Y. Hist. Coll._, ii. 467.—ED.]
[664] A copy of the original edition is also in the Library of the
Boston Athenæum, not quite perfect. Two copies were in the sale of Mr.
Brinley’s library in 1879, and they brought, one $380, the other, not
perfect, $310. Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull, in his learned Introduction
to his edition of _The True-Blue Laws of Connecticut and New Haven,
and the False Blue Laws Invented by the Rev. Samuel Peters_, etc.,
Hartford, 1876, says: “Just when or by whom the acts and proceedings of
New Haven Colony were first stigmatized as _Blue Laws_ cannot now be
ascertained. The presumption, however, is strong that the name had its
origin in New York, and that it gained currency in Connecticut among
Episcopalian and other dissenters from the established church, between
1720 and 1750” (p. 24). He thinks that “blue” was a convenient epithet
for whatever “in colonial laws and proceedings looked over-strict, or
queer, or ‘puritanic’” (pp. 24, 27).
Mr. Peters, of course, did not invent the name. He says of these laws:
“They consist of a vast multitude, and were very properly termed _Blue
Laws_, i.e., _bloody laws_.” In his _General History of Connecticut_,
London, 1781, Peters gives some forty-five of these laws as a sample of
the whole, “denominated _blue laws_ by the neighboring colonies,” which
“were never suffered to be printed.” The greater part of these probably
never had an existence as standing laws or otherwise. The archives
of the colony fail to reveal such, though we do not forget that the
jurisdiction records for nine years are lost. Peters’ laws have often
been reprinted, and appear in Mr. Trumbull’s volume above cited, along
with authentic documents relating to the foundation of Connecticut and
New Haven colonies, already referred to in this paper. (See Peters’
_Connecticut_, pp. 63, 66; the _New-Englander_, April, 1871, art. “Blue
Laws;” and _Methodist Quarterly Review_, January, 1878.)
It might be inferred from the conclusion of the titlepage (cited
above) of the small volume published by Silas Andrus, at Hartford,
in 1822, on bluish paper, bound in blue covers, with a frontispiece
representing a constable seizing a tobacco taker, which was stereotyped
and subsequently issued at different dates, that the book contained the
Peters’ laws; but what related to New Haven here were simply extracts
of a few laws and court orders from the records. The Blue Laws of
Peters were reprinted by J. W. Barber, in his _History and Antiquities
of New Haven_, 1831, with a note in which the old story is repeated,
that the term blue originated from the color of the paper in which
the first printed laws were stitched. They were also printed by Mr.
Hinman, formerly Secretary of the State of Connecticut, in 1838, in
a volume already cited, along with other valuable documents relating
to the colony, and with what he called the Blue Laws of Virginia, of
Barbadoes, of Maryland, New York, South Carolina, Massachusetts, and
Plymouth.
Peters’ _Connecticut_ (1781) is now a scarce book. The copy in the
Menzies sale, no. 1,590, brought $125. Cf. _Brinley Catalogue_, no.
2,088, etc. The interest in this apocryphal history of Connecticut and
in Peters’ Blue Laws was revived in modern times by the publication
in 1829 of a new edition of Peters’ _History_, in 12º., at New Haven,
with a preface and eighty-seven pages of supplementary notes. The
anonymous editor of the new edition was Sherman Croswell, son of the
Rev. Harry Croswell,—a recent graduate of Yale College, who furnished
the supplementary notes. Nearly all the type of this edition was set by
the late Joel Munsell, then a young man just twenty-one years of age.
Mr. Croswell subsequently went to Albany as co-editor with his cousin,
Edwin Croswell, of the _Albany Argus_. (Joel Munsell, _Manuscript
Note_; October, 1871.) Professor Franklin B. Dexter, of Yale College,
writes me under date of Feb. 20, 1883, respecting the enterprise of
publishing the new edition of Peters’ _History_: “I have heard that
the publisher, Dorus Clarke, used to say that he lost $2,000 by the
publication. Sherman Croswell was a young lawyer then living here, a
son of the Rev. Dr. Harry Croswell, and brother and classmate (Yale
College, 1822) of the more gifted Rev. William Croswell, of the Church
of the Advent in Boston. Sherman was born Nov. 10, 1802; removed to
Albany in 1831, and became an editor of the _Argus_ with his cousin,
Edwin Croswell; returned to New Haven in 1855, and died here March
4, 1859. I have repeatedly heard that he edited this publication,
though my authority has never been a very definite one. Munsell’s note
I should not hesitate to accept as far as this fact is concerned.”
Munsell inadvertently calls Sherman Croswell a brother of Edwin. A
spurious edition of this book was published in New York in 1877, edited
by a descendant of the author, S. J. McCormick. Cf. _Amer. Antiq. Soc.
Proc._, Oct. 22, 1877, and _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1877, p. 238.
But New Haven was not the only New England colony whose laws were
satirized or burlesqued by those who did not sympathize with the strict
ways of the Puritan. John Josselyn, who visited the Massachusetts
Colony twice, in his account of the country published in 1674 professes
to give some of the laws of that colony. Some of those cited by him
are true, and some are false. Some were court orders or sentences
for crimes. One is similar to a law in Peters’ code: “For kissing a
woman in the street, though in the way of civil salute, whipping or a
fine” (p. 178). Of course there were at an early period in the colony
instances of ridiculous punishments awarded at the sole discretion of
the magistrate, of which the record in all cases may not be preserved,
and it is hazardous to deny, for that reason, that they ever took
place. The existence of standing laws are more easily ascertained.
Josselyn (p. 179) refers the reader to “their Laws in print.” During
his second visit to Massachusetts (1663-1671) he could have seen the
digest of 1649, and that of 1660. Of the first no copy is now extant,
but the Connecticut code of 1650, first printed in 1822, was perhaps
substantially a transcript of it. 3 _Mass. Hist. Coll._ viii. 214.
Josselyn probably never examined either of the Massachusetts digests.
The notorious Edward Ward published, in 1699 a folio of sixteen pages,
entitled _A Trip to New England_, etc. (Carter-Brown, ii. 1580.) A
large part of it, where he speaks of “Boston and the Inhabitants,”
is abusive and scandalous. He enlarges upon Josselyn in the instance
cited, whose book he had seen. Mr. Drake and Dr. Shurtleff, in their
histories of Boston, both quote from it. No one would think of
believing “Ned Ward,” the editor of the _London Spy_, who was sentenced
more than once to stand in the pillory for his scurrility; yet for all
this he probably was as truthful, if not as pious, as Parson Peters of
a later generation.
[665] See Trumbull, i. 297; _New Haven Colonial Records_, ii. 217, 238,
363; _Connecticut Colonial Records_, ii. 283, 303, 308, 324.
[666] [See chap. x. of the present volume, and chap. ix. of Vol.
IV.—ED.]
[667] See also Winthrop’s letter in _Connecticut Historical Society’s
Collections_, i. 52, and Secretary Clarke’s in _Mass. Hist. Soc.
Proc._, xi. 344. The earnest protest of New Haven against the union,
till the time it really took place, may be seen in the records of that
colony from 1662 to 1665.
[668] See also Hutchinson, i. 213-220; the lecture on _The Regicides
sheltered in New England_, Feb. 5, 1869, by Dr. Chandler Robbins, who
used the new materials published in a volume of “Mather Papers” in 4
_Massachusetts Historical Society’s Collections_, vol. viii.; J. W.
Barber’s _History and Antiquities of New Haven_, etc., 1831.
[669] Cf. Trumbull, _History_, i. 524, 526, 362, 363; Arnold’s _Rhode
Island_, vol. i., _passim_; Palfrey, _New England_, vol. ii. [An
elaborate monograph of the _Boundary Disputes of Connecticut_, by C.
W. Bowen, Boston, 1882, covers the original claims to the soil, and
the disputes with Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New York. It is
illustrated with the Dutch map of 1616, an Indian map of 1630, and
various others.—ED.]
[670] Copies are rare. A copy sold in the Brinley sale (no. 2,001)
for $300. Mr. Brinley issued a private reprint of it, following this
copy, in which he gave a fac-simile of the title and an historical
introduction.
[671] [Cf. C. K. Adams’s _Manual of Historical Literature_, p. 552.
The author was the Rev. Benjamin Trumbull, D.D. (b. 1735; d. 1820).
The papers of Governor Jonathan Trumbull (b. 1710; d. 1785), bound
in twenty-three volumes, are in the library of the Massachusetts
Historical Society; and the writer of the present chapter is the
chairman of a committee preparing them for publication. Their chief
importance, however, is for the Revolutionary period. The papers were
procured in 1795, by Dr. Belknap, from the family of the Governor. One
volume (19th) was burned in 1825. _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, i. 85,
393.—ED.]
[672] [Dr. Trumbull’s labors ceased, with the second volume after the
union; when, beginning with 1689, the editorial charge was taken by Mr.
Hoadly.—ED.]
[673] Reference may here be made to a valuable note on the alleged
incident, as related by Dr. Benjamin Trumbull in 1797, which has for
so many years invested “The Charter Oak” with so much interest. See
Palfrey, iii. 542-544. Vol. iii. of the _Colonial Records_ contains a
valuable official correspondence relating to this period, and also the
“Laws enacted by Governor Andros and his Council,” for the colony, in
1687.
[674] The first volume (1860) has reprints of Gershom Bulkeley’s _The
People’s Right to Election ... argued_, etc., 1869, following a rare
tract of Mr. Brinley on _Their Majesties’ Colony of Connecticut in New
England Vindicated_, 1694. A second volume of _Collections_ was issued
in 1870.
[675] [The first, in 1865, contained a history of the colony, by Henry
White; an essay on its civil government, by Leonard Bacon; and others
on the currency of the colony, etc. In the second is a valuable sketch
of the life and writings of Davenport, by F. B. Dexter, and some notes
on Goffe and Whalley from the same source. The third includes J. R.
Trowbridge, Jr., on “The Ancient Maritime Interests of New Haven;”
Dr. Henry Bronson on “The early Government of Connecticut and the
Constitution of 1639;” and F. B. Dexter on “The Early Relations between
New Netherland and New England.”—ED.]
[676] It has a map of New Haven in 1641.
[677] [There is no considerable Connecticut bibliography of local
history; and F. B. Perkins’s _Check-List of American Local History_
must be chiefly depended on; but the _Brinley Catalogue_, nos.
2,001-2,340, is very rich in this department. So also is Sabin’s
_Dictionary_, iv. 395, etc., for official and anonymous publications.
There are various miscellaneous references in Poole’s _Index_, p. 292.
E. H. Gillett has a long paper on “Civil Liberty in Connecticut” in the
_Historical Magazine_, July, 1868. Mr. R. R. Hinman’s _Early Puritan
Settlers of Connecticut_ was first issued in 1846-48 (366 pages), and
reissued (884 pages) in 1852-56. Cf. _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._,
1870, p. 84. Savage’s _Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of
New England_, however, is the chief source of genealogical information
for the earliest comers.—ED.]
[678] The official name of this State since 1663 is “Rhode Island and
Providence Plantations.” The Island of “Aquedneck,” its Indian name,
spelled in various ways, was so called till 1644, when the Court
ordered that henceforth it be “called the Isle of Rhodes, or Rhode
Island.” It is said that Block, the Dutch navigator, in 1614, gave the
island the name of “Roodt Eylandt,” from the prevalence of red clay in
some portions of its shores. There are traditions connecting the name
with Verrazano and the Isle of Rhodes in Asia Minor, which require no
further mention. See Arnold’s _Rhode Island_, i. 70; _Rhode Island
Colonial Records_, i. 127; Verrazano in 2 _N. Y. Hist. Coll._, i. 46;
Brodhead’s _New York_, i. 57, 58; _Amer. Antiq. Soc. Proc._, i. 367; J.
G. Kohl, in _Magazine of American History_, February, 1883.
[679] In 1838 it was republished as vol. iv. of Rhode Island Historical
Society’s _Collections_, edited by Professor Romeo Elton, with notes,
and a memoir of the author, and reissued in Boston in 1843; cf.
_Carter-Brown Catalogue_, iii. 600.
[680] It was reprinted in 2 _Mass. Hist. Coll._, ix. 166-203. It is
called “inaccurate” by Bancroft.
[681] Cited by S. G. Arnold, _History of Rhode Island_, i. 124.
[682] Bartlett’s _Bibliography of Rhode Island_, p. 204.
[683] [A second edition was published in 1874; cf. C. K. Adams’s
_Manual of Historical Literature_, p. 552.—ED.]
[684] John Pitman’s Discourse was delivered in August, 1836; Job
Durfee’s in January, 1847; and Zachariah Allen’s in April, 1876; and
another, by Mr. Allen, on “The Founding of Rhode Island,” in 1881.
[685] The original edition of the _Key_ was issued in London in 1643.
_Brinley Catalogue_, no. 2,380. It is also reprinted in the _R. I.
Hist. Soc. Coll._, vol. i. See an earlier page under “Massachusetts.”
[686] It was at first intended to republish also such of the writings
of John Cotton, George Fox, and John Clarke as were connected with
Roger Williams, to be followed by the writings of Samuel Gorton and
Governor Coddington; but with the exception of two pieces by Cotton,
edited by R. A. Guild, the publications of the Club have been limited
to the writings of Williams.
[687] He published an abridgment in 1804, which was reprinted in
Philadelphia, in 1844, with a memoir of the author, under the title of
_Church History of New England_, from 1620 to 1804. Backus was born in
1724, and died in 1806.
[688] [Dr. Turner also read a paper—_Settlers of Aquedneck and Liberty
of Conscience_—before the Historical Society, in February, 1880, which
was published at Newport the same year.—ED.]
[689] [Dr. Dexter a few years since recovered a lost tract by Williams,
_Christenings make not Christians_, 1645, which he found in the British
Museum, and edited for Rider’s _Historical Tracts_, no. 14, in 1881,
adding certain of Williams’s letters. Williams’s letter to George
Fox, 1672, in his controversy with the Quakers, is printed in the
_Historical Magazine_, ii. 56.—ED.]
[690] [Sabin’s _Dictionary_, iv. 106; _Menzies Catalogue_, no.
392; _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 729. It was reprinted
in 4 _Mass. Hist. Coll._, ii. pp. 1-113. Thomas Cobbett’s _Civil
Magistrates’ Power in Matters of Religion modestly debated_, London,
1653, was in part an answer to this “slanderous pamphlet” (_Prince
Catalogue_, no. 97-154). The character of Clarke and the influence of
his mission to England, wherein he procured the revocation of William
Coddington’s commission as governor, gave rise to a controversy between
George Bancroft and Josiah Quincy in relation to the misapprehension
of Grahame on the subject in his _History of the United States_; cf.
_Historical Magazine_, August, 1865 (ix. 233), and the references noted
in the _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, ii. 339. Coddington (of whom there is
an alleged portrait in the Council Chamber at Newport,—_N. E. Hist.
and Geneal. Reg._, 1873, p. 241) also had his controversy with the
Massachusetts authorities, and his side of the question is given in his
_Demonstration of True Love unto ... the rulers of the Massachusetts,
... by one who was once in authority with them, but always testified
against their persecuting spirit_, which was printed in 1674. _Menzies
Catalogue_, no. 422 ($36); _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, vol. ii. no.
1,101. See _Magazine of American History_, iii. 642; _N. E. Hist. and
Geneal. Reg._, April, 1882, p. 138.—ED.]
[691] [A copy of the charter is in the _Massachusetts Archives_
(Miscellaneous, i. 135), and it is printed in the _N. E. Hist. and
Geneal. Reg._, 1857, p. 41. The discussion in the _Mass. Hist. Soc.
Proc._ was by Mr. Deane and Colonel Thomas Aspinwall. The latter’s
contribution was also issued in Providence (2d ed.) in 1865, as
_Remarks on the Narragansett Patent_.—ED.]
[692] Other digests followed in 1730, 1745, 1752, and 1767.
[693] [Cf. Thomas T. Stone on _Roger Williams the Prophetic
Legislator_, Providence, 1872.—ED.]
[694] [Cf. Mr. Whitehead’s chapter in the present volume.—ED.]
[695] See chapter xi.
[696] See chapter xi.
[697] _The History of the Province of New York, from the first
Discovery to the year MDCCXXXII. To which is annexed a Description of
the Country, with a short Account of the Inhabitants, their Trade,
Religious and Political State, and the Constitution of the Courts of
Justice in that Colony._ By William Smith, A.M. London; MDCCLVII., 4º,
pp. 255.
[698] [Of Smith and his History O’Callaghan (ii. 64) says “Smith knew
about as little of the history of New Netherland as many of his readers
of the present day.”—ED.]
[699] [Cf. Mr. Fernow’s estimate of Smith in Vol. IV. Also, _Hist.
Mag._, xiv. 266.—ED.]
[700] _The Natural, Statistical, and Civil History of the State of New
York_, in three volumes, by James Macauley. New York, 1829. 8º.
[701] [Cf. Mr. Fernow’s estimate in Vol. IV.—ED.]
[702] _History of the New Netherlands, Province of New York, and State
of New York, to the Adoption of the Federal Constitution._ In two
volumes. By William Dunlap. Printed for the author by Carter & Thorp,
New York, 1839-1840. 2 vols. 8º.
[703] [Cf. Mr. Fernow’s estimate in Vol. IV.—ED.]
[704] _History of the State of New York_, by John Romeyn Brodhead.
First period, 1609-1664. New York, 1853; second edition, 1859. Second
period, 1664-1691. New York, 1871. Harper & Brothers, New York. 2 vols.
8º. Mr. Brodhead was born Jan. 21, 1814, and died May 6, 1873.
[705] [Cf. Mr. Fernow’s estimate of Brodhead in Vol. IV., where, in
the chapter on New Netherland, an examination is made of the labors of
Brodhead and others in amassing and arranging the documentary history
of the State.—ED.]
[706] See also Bowden’s _Friends in America_, i. 309; Lamb’s _New
York_, i. 180; Valentine’s _Manual_, 1842-43, p. 147; Gay’s _Popular
History of the United States_, ii. 236.
[707] There were later enlarged editions in 1680 and 1705, or of about
those dates. Muller, _Catalogue_ (1877), no. 3,389.
[708] Cf. Mr. Fernow’s chapter in Vol. IV. It was afterwards followed
in part in Lotter’s map. (Asher’s _List_, no. 20.)
[709] [See a chapter in Vol. IV. for the Dutch rule.—ED.]
[710] [See this volume, chap. x., for the English Conquest.—ED.]
[711] [See Vol. IV. for the Swedish rule.—ED.]
[712] [See chapter ix.; and the full treatment of the struggle to
maintain the charter, given by Mr Deane, in the _Memorial History of
Boston_, i. 329.—ED.]
[713] _East Jersey under the Proprietary Governments_, pp. 250, 251.
[714] Leaming and Spicer’s _Grants and Concessions_, p. 493.
[715] [See chapter x.—ED.]
[716] It was entitled _A Brief Account of the Province of East Jersey
in America, published by the present Proprietors, for information of
all such persons who are or may be inclined to settle themselves,
families, and servants in that country_.
[717] It was styled _A Brief Account of the Province of East New
Jersey in America. Published by the Scots’ Proprietors having interest
there, For the information of such as may have a desire to Transport
themselves or their Families thither; wherein the Nature and Advantage
of, and Interest in, a Forraign Plantation to this Country is
Demonstrated. Printed by_ JOHN REID.
[718] Twenty-five copies were printed separately, bearing date 1867.
Sabin’s _Dictionary_, xiii. 53,079. _Alofsen Catalogue_, No. 823.
[719] Vol. I. p. 226.
[720] It was entitled _The Model of the Government of the Province of
East New Jersey in America; And Encouragements for such as Designs to
be concerned there. Published for Information of such as are desirous
to be Interested in that place_.
[721] [The copies known are these: 1. New Jersey Historical Society. 2.
Harvard College Library. 3. John Carter Brown Library, Providence. 4.
William A. Whitehead, Newark. 5. J. A. King, Long Island. 6. British
Museum. 7. Huth Library, London. 8. Advocates’ Library, Edinburgh. 9.
Göttingen University. 10. Lenox Library, New York.—ED.]
[722] The title, in full, is quite a correct table of contents, and
under the several headings is given very excellent advice as to the
course to be followed to insure success in the new settlements. It is
as follows: _Good Order Established in Pennsilvania and New Jersey in
America. Being a true Account of the Country, With its Produce and
Commodities there made, And the great Improvements that may be made by
means of Publick Store-houses for Hemp, Flax, and Linnen-Cloth; also,
the Advantages of a Publick School, the profits of a Publick Bank, and
the Probability of its arising, if those directions here laid down are
followed; With the advantages of publick Granaries. Likewise, several
other things needful to be understood by those that are or do intend to
be concerned in planting in the said Countries. All which is laid down
very plain in this small Treatise; it being easie to be understood by
any ordinary Capacity. To which the Reader is referred for his further
satisfaction. By_ THOMAS BUDD. _Printed in the year 1685_.
[723] The title, which may also be considered a table of contents, was
as follows: _An Historical Description of the Province and Country of
West New Jersey in America. A short View of their Laws, Customs, and
Religions. As also the Temperament of the Air and Climate, The fatness
of the Soil, with the vast Produce of Rice, etc., the improvement of
the Lands as in England to Pasture, Meadows, etc. Their making great
quantities of Pitch and Tar, as also Turpentine, which proceeds from
the Pine Trees, with Rosen as clear as Gum Arabick, with particular
Remarks upon their Towns, Fairs, and Markets; with the great Plenty of
Oyl and Whale-Bone, made from the great number of whales they yearly
take: As also many other Profitable and New Improvements. Never made
Publick till now. By_ GABRIEL THOMAS.
[This book is rare, and may be worth, when found, $200. Copies have
brought, however, $300 within ten years. _Griswold Catalogue_, Part
I. No. 851. It was reprinted in lithographic fac-simile in New York
in 1848 for Henry Austin Brady. One copy, on blue writing paper and
illustrated, was in the Griswold sale, No. 852.—ED.]
[724] It was entitled _The Case put and decided. By George Fox, George
Whitehead, Stephen Crisp, and other the most Antient and Eminent
Quakers. Between Edward Billing, on the one part, and some West
Jersians, headed by Samuell Jenings, on the other part, In an Award
relating to the Government of their Province, wherein, because not
moulded to the Pallate of the said Samuell, the Light, the Truth, the
Justice, and Infallibility of these great Friends are arreigned by him
and his Accomplices. Also Several Remarks and Anniversations on the
same Award, setting forth the Premises. With some Reflections on the
Sensless Opposition of these Men against the present Governour, and
their daring Audatiousness in their presumptuous asserting an Authority
here over the Parliament of England. Published for the Information of
the Impartial and Considerate, particularly such as Worship God and
profess Christianity not in Faction and Hypocrisie, but in Truth and
Sincerity_. Ending with the texts Isa. xxx. 1, Isa. xlvii. 10, and [no
book given] v. 11.
[725] He entitled it _Truth Rescued from Forgery and Falshood. Being An
Answer to a late Scurralous piece, Entituled The Case put and Decided,
etc.; Which Stole into the World without any known Author’s name
affixed thereto, And renders it the more like its Father, Who was a
Lyer and Murtherer from the Beginning. By_ SAMUEL JENINGS.
[726] _A Journal of the Life, Travels, Sufferings, and Labour of
Love in the Work of the Ministry of that Worthy Elder and faithful
Servant of Jesus Christ, William Edmundson, Who departed this Life the
thirty-first of the sixth Month, 1712._
[727] It received the following title: _A Bill in the Chancery of New
Jersey, at the Suit of John, Earl of Stair, and others, Proprietors of
the Eastern-Division of New Jersey, against Benjamin Bond, and some
other Persons of Elizabeth-Town, distinguished as Clinker Lot Right
Men; With three large Maps, done from Copper Plates. To which is added
The Publications of the Council of Proprietors of East New Jersey, and
Mr. Nevill’s Speeches to the General Assembly, Concerning the Riots
committed in New Jersey, and the Pretences of the Rioters, and their
Seducers. These Papers will give a better Light into the History and
Constitution of New Jersey than any Thing hitherto published, the
Matters whereof have been chiefly collected from Records. Published by
Subscription: Printed by James Parker, in New York, 1747, and a few
Copies are to be Sold by him and Benjamin Franklin, in Philadelphia.
Price, bound, and Maps coloured, Three Pounds; plain and stitcht only,
Fifty Shillings, Proclamation Money_.
[728] It is to be regretted that one who is styled by Smith, the
historian of New York, “a gentleman eminent in the law, and equally
distinguished for his humanity, generosity, great ability, and
honorable stations,” should never have had his biography written.
[Alexander’s own copy of the bill was sold in the Brinley sale, 1880,
No. 3591, and contained considerable manuscript additions in his
handwriting.—ED.]
[729] The following is the title of the publication: _An Answer to a
Bill in the Chancery of New Jersey, at the suit of John, Earl of Stair,
and others, commonly called Proprietors of the Eastern Division of New
Jersey, against Benjamin Bond and others, claiming under the original
Proprietors and Associates, of Elizabeth-Town. To which is added:
Nothing either of The Publications of The Council of Proprietors of
East New-Jersey, or of The Pretences of the Rioters and their Seducers;
Except, so far as the Persons meant by Rioters Pretend Title against
the Parties to the above Answer; but a Great Deal of the Controversy,
Though Much Less of the History and Constitution of New Jersey than the
said Bill. Audi Alteram Partem. Published by Subscription. New York:
Printed and Sold by James Parker at the New Printing Office in Beaver
Street_. 1752, pp. 218, _folio_.
[730] Of the minor publications meriting attention the following are
thought worthy of notice here:—
_A Brief Vindication of the Purchassors Against the Proprietors in a
Christian Manner. 48 pages 20º. New York, 1746._
_An Answer to the Council of Proprietors’ two Publications, set forth
at Perth Amboy the 25th of March, 1746, and the 25th of March, 1747. As
also some observations on Mr. Nevill’s Speech to the House of Assembly
in relation to a Petition presented to the House of Assembly, met
at Trentown, in the Province of New Jersey, in May, 1746. New York:
Printed and sold by the Widow Catharine Zenger, 1747_. _Folio_, pp. 13.
This is very rare, only two copies known.
_A Pocket Commentary of the first settling of New Jersey by the
Europeans; and an Account or fair detail of the original Indian East
Jersey Grants, and other rights of the like tenor in East New Jersey.
Digested in order. New York: Printed by Samuel Parker. 1759. 8º._
To these may be added the following of an earlier date:—
_A further account of New Jersey in an Abstract of Letters lately writ
from thence by several inhabitants there resident, 1676._ This has been
reprinted in fac-simile by Mr. Brinton Coxe.
_The true state of the case between John Fenwick, Esq., and John
Eldridge and Edmund Warner, concerning Mr. Fenwick’s Ten Parts of
his land in West New Jersey in America_. London, 1677; Philadelphia,
reprinted 1765. A copy is in the Pennsylvania Historical Society’s
Library, as I am informed by Mr. F. D. Stone, the librarian.
_An Abstract or Abbreviation of some few of the many (Later and Former)
Testimony from the inhabitants of New Jersey and other eminent persons
who have wrote particularly Concerning that Place._ London, 1681. 4º.
32 pp. Several of these letters, between 1677 and 1680, are printed in
Smith’s _History_. The preface and whole tenor of the publication shows
that rumors published in London were having a detrimental effect. There
is a copy in the Carter-Brown Library.
_Proposals by the Proprietors of East New Jersey in America for the
building of a town on Amboy Point, and for the disposition of Lands in
that Province._ London, 1682, 4º. 6 pp.
[731] _The History of the Colony of Nova-Cæsaria, or New Jersey:
containing an account of its First Settlement, progressive
improvements, the original and present Constitution, and other events,
to the year 1721, with some particulars since; and a short view of its
present state. By_ SAMUEL SMITH, _Burlington, in New Jersey. Printed
and sold by James Parker. Sold also by David Hall, in Philadelphia,
MDCCLXV. 8º_. [Smith was born in 1720, and died in 1776. This edition
is a rare book, and may be worth $25.00. Copies have brought much
higher sums.—ED.]
[732] As late as 1877, a second edition was published without any
alteration,—a questionable proceeding, but evincing the estimation in
which the work is held at the present day. [It was issued by William
S. Sharp at Trenton, and contains a brief memoir of the author by his
nephew, the late John Jay Smith, of Germantown, Pennsylvania.—ED.]
[733] It is entitled _The Grants, Concessions, and Original
Constitutions of the Province of New Jersey: The Acts Passed during the
Proprietary Governments, and other material Transactions before the
Surrender thereof to Queen Anne; The Instrument of Surrender, and Her
formal acceptance thereof; Lord Cornbury’s Commission and Instructions
consequent thereon. Collected by some Gentlemen employed by the
General Assembly, And afterwards Published by Vertue of an Act of the
Legislature of the said Province. With proper Tables, alphabetically
digested, containing the principal Matters in the Book. By_ AARON
LEAMING _and_ JACOB SPICER. _Philadelphia: Printed by W Bradford,
Printer to the King’s Most Excellent Majesty for the Province of New
Jersey._ Small folio, pp. 763. The date of printing does not appear
upon the titlepage; but it is presumed to have been in 1758.
[734] Since this notice of the book was written a new edition of it
has unexpectedly appeared, printed by Honeyman & Co., Somerville, New
Jersey.
[735] _Documents relating to the Colonial History of the State of New
Jersey. [First Series.] Edited by_ WILLIAM A. WHITEHEAD. _Vol. I.
1631-1687. Newark: Daily Journal Establishment. 1880. 8º._ Succeeding
volumes cover a period later than that which now occupies us.
[736] Its full title was _East Jersey under the Proprietary
Governments; a Narrative of Events connected with the settlement and
progress of the Province, until the Surrender of the Government to the
Crown in 1702. Drawn principally from original sources. By_ WILLIAM A.
WHITEHEAD. _With an appendix containing The Model of the Government of
East New Jersey in America. By_ GEORGE SCOT, _of Pitlochie. Now first
reprinted from the original edition of 1685. 8º_. pp. 341. A second
edition, revised and enlarged, making a volume of 486 pages, with a
large number of fac-simile autographs, was published in 1875. [It was
also published separate from the _Collections_. It contained a map of
New Jersey, 1656, following Vanderdonck’s, and another of East Jersey,
with the settlements of about 1682, marked by Mr. Whitehead.—ED.]
[737] On the family of Sir Edmund Plowden, see Burke’s _Commoners_ and
_Landed Gentry of Great Britain and Ireland_, under “Plowden;” Baker’s
_Northamptonshire_, under “Fermor;” the _Visitation of Oxfordshire_,
published by the Harleian Society, and other works cited below,
particularly _Records of the English Province of the Society of Jesus_,
by Henry Foley, S. J. (London, 1875-1882), especially vol. iv. pp. 537
_et seq._
[738] On this point, see Father Foley’s _Records_, just mentioned, and
“A Missing Page of Catholic American History,—New Jersey colonized by
Catholics,” by the Rev. R. L. Burtsell, D.D., in the _Catholic World_
for November, 1880 (xxxii. 204 _et seq._, New York, 1881). Sir Edmund
Plowden was not so stanch in his adherence to his faith as was his
illustrious grandfather, for in 1635 he is said (temporarily, at least)
to have counterfeited conformity in religion. See “Sir Edmund Plowden
in the Fleet,” by the Rev. Edward D. Neill, in the _Pennsylvania
Magazine_, v. 424 _et seq._, an article which “furnishes some facts
relative to the career of Sir Edmund Plowden just before he left
England for Virginia,” from “the calendars of British State papers
during the reign of Charles the First.”
[739] See “Sir Edmund Plowden or Ployden,” by “Albion,” in _Notes
and Queries_, iv. 319 _et seq._ (London, 1852), containing so many
statements not elsewhere met with as to have provoked a series of
pertinent queries from the late Sebastian F. Streeter, Secretary of the
Maryland Historical Society, Ibid., ix. 301-2 (London, 1854), several
of which, unfortunately, are still unanswered.
[740] The petitions and warrant mentioned, with a paper entitled
“The Commodities of the Island called Manati ore Long Isle within
the Continent of Virginia,” extracted from Strafford’s _Letters and
Despatches_ (i. 72) and _Colonial Papers_ (vol. vi. nos. 60, 61), in
the Public Record Office at London, are given in the _N. Y. Hist. Soc.
Coll._, 1869, pp. 213 _et seq._ (New York, 1870). “Between this period
and 1634,” according to “Albion,” “Sir Edmund was engaged in fulfilling
the conditions of the warrant by carrying out the colonization by
indentures, which were executed and enrolled in Dublin, and St. Mary’s,
in Maryland, in America. In Dublin the parties were Viscount Muskerry,
100 planters; Lord Monson, 100 planters; Sir Thomas Denby, 100
planters; Captain Clayborne (of American notoriety), 50; Captain Balls;
and amounting in all to 540 colonizers, beside others in Maryland,
Virginia, and New England.” The same persons, with “Lord Sherrard”
and “Mr. Heltonhead” and his brother, are named as lessees under the
charter of New Albion, in Varlo’s _Floating Ideas of Nature_, ii. 13,
hereafter spoken of.
[741] “Confirmed,” says “Albion,” “24th July, 1634.” The Latin original
of this charter may be seen in the _Pennsylvania Magazine_, vol. vii.
p. 50 _et seq._ (Philadelphia, 1883), with an Introductory Note by the
writer, embracing Printz’s account of Plowden, extracts from the wills
of Sir Edmund and Thomas Plowden, and a portion of Varlo’s pamphlet,
hereafter referred to.
[742] So “Albion.”
[743] Printed in Rymer’s _Fœdera_, xix. 472 _et seq._, A.D. 1633,
and reprinted in Ebenezer Hazard’s _Historical Collections_, i. 335
_et seq._, Philadelphia, 1792. For biographical accounts of Yong
and Evelin, see _Memoir and Letters of Captain W. Glanville Evelyn_
(Oxford, 1879), and _The Evelyns in America_ (Ibid., 1881), both edited
and annotated by G. D. Scull; cf. also “Robert Evelyn, Explorer of
the Delaware,” by the Rev. E. D. Neill, in the _Historical Magazine_,
second series, vol. iv. pp. 75, 76; and Neill’s _Founders of Maryland_,
p. 54, note.
[744] These facts are stated in letters from Yong to Sir Tobie
Matthew, referred to in the chapter on Maryland, which also contains a
fac-simile of the signature of Thomas Yong.
[745] _Direction for Adventurers, and true description of the
healthiest, pleasantest, and richest Plantation of New Albion, in North
Virginia, in a letter from Mayster Robert Eveline, that lived there
many years._ Small 4º. (“Liber rarissimus,” Allibone.) It was reprinted
in chapter iii. of Plantagenet’s _Description of New Albion_, hereafter
mentioned.
[746] So Beauchamp Plantagenet.
[747] Before the Committee of Trade. See Samuel Hazard’s _Annals of
Pennsylvania_, p. 109.
[748] With regard to whom see Vol. IV., chapter on “New Sweden.”
[749] Hazard’s _Annals_, pp. 109, 110, citing “Albany Records,” iii.
224.
[750] “Sir Edmund Plowden,” by the Rev. Edward D. Neill, _Pennsylvania
Magazine of History_, v. 206 _et seq._, citing “Manuscript records of
Maryland, at Annapolis.”
[751] Printed at the end of _Kolonien Nya Sveriges Grundläggning_,
1637-1642, af C. T. Odhner (Stockholm, 1876), referred to in Vol. IV.,
chapter on “New Sweden.” The “former communications” spoken of in it
cannot be found, although they have been diligently sought for, on
behalf of the writer, in Sweden.
[752] Accomack and Kecoughtan (as it is usually spelled by English
writers), the present Hampton. The diverse orthography of the text
conforms to the original. The places are noted on contemporary maps.
[753] Cited in Vol. IV., chapter on “New Sweden.” John Romeyn Brodhead,
in his _History of the State of New York_, i. 381, 484, mentions
Plowden’s visits to Manhattan as occurring in 1643 and 1648.
[754] Scull’s _Evelyns in America_, p. 361 _et seq._ The lawyers
referred to were Henry Clerk and Arthur Turner, serjeants-at-law, and
Arthur Ducke, Thomas Ryves, Robert Mason, William Merricke, Giles
Sweit, Robert King, and William Turner, doctors of laws; of whom, says
the editor, two at least, Ducke and Ryves, are “recognized as very
able and learned lawyers in their day.” The rest, as well as Bysshe,
speak of the letters patent as “under the Great Seal of Ireland.” I
am informed by Mr. Scull that the documents mentioned constitute a
manuscript folio volume now in the Bodleian Library, Oxford.
[755] _A Description of the Province of New Albion. And a Direction
for Adventurers with small stock to get two for one, and good land
freely: And for Gentlemen, and all Servants, Labourers, and Artificers
to live plentifully. And a former Description reprinted of the
healthiest, pleasantest, and richest Plantation of New Albion in
North Virginia, proved by thirteen witnesses. Together with a Letter
from Master Robert Evelin, that lived there many years, shewing the
particularities, and excellency thereof. With a briefe of the charge
of victuall, and necessaries, to transport and buy stock for each
Planter, or Labourer, there to get his Master £50 per Annum, or more
in twelve trades, at £10 charges onely a man. Printed in the Year
1648._ Small 4º, 32 pp. (Sabin’s _Dictionary_, vol. v. no. 19,724.)
On the _verso_ of the titlepage (reproduced here from the copy of the
book in the Philadelphia Library) appear: “The Order, Medall, and
Riban of the Albion Knights, of the Conversion of 23 Kings, their
support;” the medal (given also in Mickle’s _Reminiscences of Old
Gloucester_) bearing on its face a coroneted effigy of Sir Edmund
Plowden, surrounded by the legend, ‘EDMUNDUS. COMES. PALATINUS. ET.
GUBER. N. ALBION,’ and on the reverse two coats of arms impaled; the
dexter, those of the Province of New Albion, namely, the open Gospel,
surmounted by a hand dexter issuing from the partiline grasping a
sword erect, surmounted by a crown; the sinister, those of Plowden
himself, a _fesse dancettée_ with two _fleurs-de-lis_ on the upper
points; supporters, two bucks rampant gorged with crowns,—the whole
surmounted by the coronet of an Earl Palatine, and encircled with
the motto, ‘SIC SUOS VIRTUS BEAT;’ and the order consisting of this
achievement encircled by twenty-two heads couped and crowned, held up
by a crowned savage kneeling,—the whole surrounded with the legend,
‘DOCEBO INIQUOS VIAS TUAS, ET IMPII AD TE CONVERTENTUR.’ These
engravings are accompanied by Latin mottoes and English verses on
“Ployden” and “Albion’s Arms.” The work is the subject of an essay
entitled “An Examination of Beauchamp Plantagenet’s Description of the
Province of New Albion,” by John Penington, in the _Memoirs of the
Historical Society of Pennsylvania_, vol. iv. pt. i. pp. 133 _et seq._
(Philadelphia, 1840), for which the writer is very justly censured
by a reviewer in the _Gentleman’s Magazine_ for August, 1840, in
these terms: “He has shown himself not unskilful in throwing ridicule
upon the exaggerations and falsifications with which (as unhappily
has been generally the case with such compositions in all ages) the
prospectus of Ployden, or Plowden, abounds; but he has failed in the
more difficult task of separating truth from falsehood.” The same
critic says: “It is clear to us that the pamphlet was issued with the
consent, and probably at the procuration and charges, of Sir Edmund
Ployden;” and he attempts to throw some light upon the personality of
the author, whose name of “Plantagenet,” undoubtedly, is fictitious.
Besides the copy of the _Description of New Albion_ in the Philadelphia
Library, there is another in the Carter-Brown Library (_Catalogue_,
vol. ii. no. 649), at Providence; three are mentioned by Mr. Penington
as included in private libraries; and two, says the writer in the
_Gentleman’s Magazine_, are preserved in the British Museum. The book
was reprinted from the Philadelphia copy in _Tracts and Other Papers_
collected by Peter Force, vol. ii. no. 7 (Washington, 1838), and again
reprinted from Force in Scull’s _Evelyns in America_, p. 67 _et seq._
The citations in the text are taken directly from the Philadelphia
and Carter-Brown copies, which will account for some variations from
these occasionally inaccurate reprints. A second edition of the
original is mentioned by Lowndes as published in 1650. See the _Huth
Catalogue_, which says: “The original edition was doubtless published
at Middleburgh in 1641 or 1642.”
[756] An intimacy which authorized Plantagenet to speak thus of the
Earl Palatine: “I found his conversation as sweet and winning, as grave
and sober, adorned with much Learning, enriched with sixe Languages,
most grounded and experienced in forain matters of State policy, and
government, trade, and sea voyages, by 4 years travell in Germany,
France, Italy, and Belgium, by 5 years living an Officer in Ireland,
and this last 7 years in America.” “Sir Edmund Plowden,” says “Albion,”
“was not inferior to any of his co-governors in ability, fortune,
position, or family.”
[757] Reproduced in Heylin’s _Cosmographie_, in Philips’s enlarged
edition of Speed’s _Prospect of the Most Famous Parts of the World_, in
Stith’s _History of Virginia_ (Williamsburg, 1747), and in the _Pocket
Commentary of the first Settling of New Jersey by the Europeans_ (New
York, 1759). Compare “Councells Opinions concerning Coll. Nicholls
pattent and Indian purchases,” in _Doc. Col. Hist. N. Y._, xiii. 486,
487 (Albany, 1881). On certain of these points, see “Expedition of
Captain Samuel Argall,” by George Folsom, in _N. Y. Hist. Soc. Coll._,
second series, i. 333 _et seq._ (New York, 1841), and Brodhead’s
_History of the State of New York_, i. 54, 55, 140, and notes E and F.
[758] See _Sketches of the Primitive Settlements on the River
Delaware_, by James N. Barker (Philadelphia, 1827), Penington’s work
already cited, and “An Inquiry into the Location of Mount Ployden,
the Seat of the Raritan King,” by the Rev. George C. Schanck, in _New
Jersey Hist. Soc. Proc._, vi. 25 _et seq._ (Newark, N. J., 1853).
According to Plantagenet, “The bounds is a thousand miles compasse, of
this most temperate, rich Province, for our South bound is Maryland
North bounds, and beginneth at Aquats or the Southermost or first Cape
of Delaware Bay in thirty-eight and forty minutes, and so runneth
by, or through, or including Kent Isle, through Chisapeack Bay to
Pascatway, including the fals of Pawtomecke river to the head or
Northermost branch of that river, being three hundred miles due West;
and thence Northward to the head of Hudson’s river fifty leagues, and
so down Hudson’s river to the Ocean, sixty leagues; and thence by
the Ocean and Isles a crosse Delaware Bay to the South Cape, fifty
leagues; in all seven hundred and eighty miles. Then all Hudson’s
river, Isles, Long Isle, or Pamunke, and all Isles within ten leagues
of the said Province being; and note Long Isle alone is twenty broad,
and one hundred and eighty miles long, so that alone is four hundred
miles compasse.” These limits of New Albion, as given in Smith’s
_History of New Jersey_, are cited by the Rev. William Smith, D.D.,
in _An Examination of the Connecticut Claim to Lands in Pennsylvania_
(Philadelphia, 1774), with the remark, page 83: “This Grant, which was
intended to include all the Dutch Claims, was the Foundation of the
Duke of York’s Grant.”
[759] Domestic Interregnum, Entry Book, xcii. 108, 159, 441. Reprinted
in _N. Y. Hist. Soc. Coll._ 1869, pp. 221-22.
[760] Reproduced herewith from a copy in the possession of John
Cadwalader, Esq., of Philadelphia. It will be seen that Mr. Penington
was correct in his account of this map, _op. cit._, notwithstanding the
criticisms of the reviewer of his work in the _Gentleman’s Magazine_,
which were based not on this, but on a similar map in _The Discovery of
New Britaine_ (London, 1651), in the British Museum, collated by “John
Farrer, Esq.” Cf. Editorial Note A, following chapter v.
[761] Neill’s _Sir Edmund Plowden_, before cited.
[762] The document is on file in the Prerogative Court of Canterbury,
London, and has two seals attached to it,—described by “Albion” as Sir
Edmund’s “private seal of the Plowdens, and his Earl’s with supporters,
signed ‘Albion,’ the same as is given in Beauchamp Plantagenet’s _New
Albion_.” The extracts in the text were copied from the original will
by a London correspondent of the writer.
[763] Extract courteously made from the original at Somerset House,
London, by the same correspondent. This gentleman assures me that,
notwithstanding the declaration of “Albion” to the contrary, the will
contains “no allusion whatever to the death of anybody at the hands of
American Indians.”
[764] In his manuscript Journal, preserved in Sweden.
[765] See _Doc. Col. Hist. N. Y._, ii. 82, 92.
[766] In these terms: “A Commission was granted to Sir Edmund
Ploydon for planting and possessing the more Northern parts [of New
Netherland], which lie towards New England, by the name of New Albion.”
Similarly (following Heylin) the _Pocket Commentary of the first
Settling of New Jersey_.
[767] Maps of “New England and New York” and “Virginia and Maryland,”
in this work, name the region on the west side of the Delaware south of
the Schuylkill “Aromaninck,” which was understood by Mr. Neill to be
the “Eriwomeck” of Yong and Evelin, placed, therefore, at that point
by him in articles in the _Historical Magazine_ and the _Pennsylvania
Magazine of History_, before referred to. “Aromanink” is given on
another map, one of Visscher’s (from which these in Speed’s work were
partly derived), agreeing with several of the period in assigning
“Ermomex” (quite as likely the true “Eriwomeck”) to the eastern side of
the Delaware. Modern historians of New Jersey, following a statement of
Evelin, place Yong’s Fort near Pensaukin Creek.
[768] For information with regard to this family, see Note B to
Mr. Henry C. Murphy’s translation of “The Representation of New
Netherland,” _N. Y. Hist. Soc. Coll._, second series, ii. 323 _et
seq._ (New York, 1849), and the Rev. Dr. Burtsell’s article, already
quoted. The latter lays particular stress upon the devout fidelity to
the Catholic Church of the kinsfolk of the Earl Palatine of New Albion,
whether in England or America, and intimates the Catholic character of
Sir Edmund Plowden’s projected colony.
[769] In 8º, 30 pp., with the following titlepage: _The Finest Part
of America. To be Sold, or Lett, From Eight Hundred to Four Thousand
Acres, in a Farm, All that Entire Estate, called Long Island, in New
Albion, Lying near New York: Belonging to the Earl Palatine of Albion,
Granted to His Predecessor, Earl Palatine of Albion, By King Charles
the First._ [asterism] _The Situation of Long Island is well known,
therefore needs no Description here. New Albion is a Part of the
Continent of Terra Firma, described in the Charter to begin at Cape
May; from thence Westward 120 Miles, running by the River Delaware,
closely following its Course by the North Latitude, to a certain
Rivulet there arising from a Spring of Lord Baltimore’s, in Maryland;
to the South from thence, taking its Course into a Square, bending to
the North by a Right Line 120 Miles; from thence also into a Square
inclining to the East in a right Line 120 Miles to the River and Port
of Reacher Cod, and descends to a Savannah or Meadow, turning and
including the Top of Sandy Hook; from thence along the Shore to Cape
May, where it began, forming a Square of 120 Miles of good Land. Long
Island is mostly improved and fit for a Course of Husbandry. N.B.—Great
Encouragement will be given to improving Tenants, by letting the Lands
very cheap, on Leases of Lives, renewable for ever_. _Letters (Post
paid) signed with real Names, directed for F. P., at Mr. Reynell’s
Printing-Office, No. 21, Piccadilly, near the Hay-Market, will be
answered, and the Writer directed where he may be treated with,
relative to the Conditions of Sale, Charter, Title Deeds, a Map, with
the Farms allotted thereon, etc., etc. Just Published, and may be had
as above (Price One Shilling), A True Copy of the Above Charter, With
the Conditions of Letting, or Selling the Land, and other Articles
relating thereto_. A copy of this rare tract (that collated by Sabin,
and consulted by the writer) is owned by Mr. Charles H. Kalbfleisch,
of New York; others are mentioned in Mr. Whitehead’s _East Jersey
under the Proprietors_ (2d ed.), p. 11, _note_, as belonging to the
late John Ruthurfurd, of Newark, N. J., and the late Henry C. Murphy,
of New York. The copy formerly pertaining to Varlo’s counsellor,
William Rawle, long since passed out of the possession of his family.
Of the contents of the book mentioned in the text, the translation
of the charter and the lease and release were reprinted in Hazard’s
_Historical Collections_, i. 160 _et seq._; the address is given (with
the error “Sir Edward” for “Sir Edmund Plowden”) in a “parergon” to
Penington’s essay; and the conditions for letting or selling land
appear in the _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_, vii. 54, as before
intimated.
[770] “The Proclamation,” says Mr. Murphy, “has not been republished.
The only copy which we know of is the one for the use of which we are
indebted to the kindness of the Hon. Peter Force, of Washington.”
[771] Notice was also given that “True copies in Latin and English of
the original charter registered in Dublin, authenticated under the hand
and seal of the Lord Mayor of Dublin, 1784, may be seen, by applying to
Captain Cope, at the State Arms Tavern, New York.”
[772] An account of Varlo’s “Tour through America” was given in his
_Nature Displayed_, p. 116 _et seq._ (London, 1794), and was reprinted
(with slight variations of phrase) in his _Floating Ideas of Nature_,
ii. 53 _et seq._, London, 1796. A copy of the former book is in the
Mercantile Library of Philadelphia, and one of the latter is in the
Library of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.
[773] The letters appear in the _Floating Ideas of Nature_, ii. 9 _et
seq._
[774] The authorities cited in this paper contain, it is believed,
all the facts in print concerning New Albion, although the subject is
mentioned in all the general and in many of the local annals of New
Jersey, as well as in several histories of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and
New York.
[775] See chapter ix.
[776] As early as 1658 Josiah Coale and Thomas Thurston visited the
Susquehanna Indians. They were received with great kindness, and spent
some weeks with the red men, travelling over two hundred miles in their
company. Coale also visited the tribes of Martha’s Vineyard and others
of Massachusetts. He returned to them after being liberated from prison
at Sandwich, and was told by a chief: “The Englishmen do not love
Quakers, but the Quakers are honest men and do no harm; and this is no
Englishman’s sea or land, and the Quakers shall come here and welcome.”
Of this early teacher Penn wrote: “Therefore shall his memorial remain
as a sweet oyntment with the Righteous, and time shall never blot him
out of their remembrance.” Fox had several meetings with the Indians,
and at one he says, “They sat very grave and sober, and were all very
attentive, beyond many called Christians.” After Fox’s return to
England, his interest in the Indians continued, and in 1681 he wrote to
the Burlington Meeting to invite the Indians to worship with them. It
was thus that the way was prepared for the peaceful settlement of West
Jersey and Pennsylvania.
[777] [See Mr. Whitehead’s chapter in the present volume.—ED.]
[778] _An Abstract or Abbreviation of some Few of the Many (Latter and
Former) Testimonys from the Inhabitants of New Jersey_, etc. London,
1681.
[779] [The history of the Swedish period is told in Vol. IV.—ED.]
[780] _History of Chester County, Pa._, by Judge J. Smith Futhey and
Gilbert Cope, p. 18.
[781] The courts were of three different kinds: namely, the County
Courts, Orphans’ Courts, and Provincial Court. The County Courts sat
at irregular intervals during the year, and were composed of justices
of the peace, commissioned from time to time, the number of whom
varied with the locality, the press of business, or the caprice of
the government. They had jurisdiction to try criminal offences of
inferior grades, and all civil causes except where the title to land
was in controversy. In proper cases they exercised a distinct equity
jurisdiction, which seems, however, to have been excessively irritating
to the people. In many instances they were materially assisted in their
labors by boards of peacemakers, who were annually appointed to settle
controversies, and who performed pretty nearly the same functions as
modern arbitrators. The Justices of the County Courts sat also in the
Orphans’ Courts, which were established in every county to control and
distribute the estates of decedents. For some cause now imperfectly
understood, the conduct of the early Orphans’ Courts was exceedingly
unsatisfactory, and their practice so irregular that but little can be
gleaned respecting them.
The Provincial Court, which was established in 1684, was composed of
five, afterwards of three, judges, who were always among the most
considerable men in the province. They had jurisdiction in cases of
heinous or enormous crimes, and also in all cases where the title to
land was in controversy. An appeal also lay to this court from the
County and Orphans’ Courts, in all cases where it was thought that
injustice had been done.
[782] In 1700 the admiralty jurisdiction was done away with by the
establishment of a regular vice-admiralty court in the province.
[783] Manuscript note furnished by Lawrence Lewis, Jr., Esq.
[784] [See the Maryland view of this controversy in chap. xiii.—ED.]
[785] This must not be confused with the present Cape Henlopen, which
was in 1760 called Cape Cornelius. The line was eventually run from
a point known as “The False Cape,” about twenty-three or twenty-four
miles south of the present Cape Henlopen.
[786] While in America, Penn made other purchases from the Indians. One
purchase from the Five Nations for land on the Susquehanna was delayed
until after the limits between Pennsylvania and Maryland were settled,
when it was consummated in 1696, through the agency of Governor Dongan
of New York, and confirmed by the Indians in 1701.
[787] Manuscript note furnished by Samuel W. Pennypacker, Esq.
[788] [There is a contemporary map showing the laying out of
Philadelphia by Holme (concerning which much will be found in John
Reed’s _Explanation of the Map of Philadelphia_, 1774), and also a part
of Harris’s map of Pennsylvania, which gives the location of Pennsbury
Manor, Penn’s country house, in Bucks County, four miles above Bristol,
on the Delaware, which was built during Penn’s first visit, on land
purchased by Markham of the Indians. See the view in Gay’s _Popular
History of the United States_, iii. 174.—ED.]
[789] Their frames were logs; they were thirty feet long and eighteen
wide, with a partition in the middle forming two rooms, one of which
could be again divided. They were covered with clapboards, which were
“rived feather-edged.” They were lined and filled in. The floor of the
lower rooms was the ground; that of the upper was of clapboards. These
houses, he said, would last ten years; but some persons, even in the
villages, had built much better. The house built for James Claypoole
was about such as we have described. It had, however, a good cellar,
but no chimney. He said it looked like a barn.
[790] _Some Account of the Province of Pennsilvania in America, Lately
Granted under the Great Seal of England To William Penn, etc., Together
with Priviledges and Powers necessary to the well-governing thereof.
Made public for the Information of such as are or may be disposed to
Transport Themselves or Servants into those Parts._ London: Printed and
Sold by Benjamin Clark, etc., 1681.
See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 1,225; _Rice Catalogue_,
no. 1,753. There is a copy in Harvard College Library, from which the
accompanying fac-simile of title is taken. The chief portion of it
is reprinted in Hazard’s _Annals of Pennsylvania_, p. 505; Hazard’s
_Register of Pennsylvania_, i. 305.
In this pamphlet we have the origin of the quit-rents, which gave
considerable uneasiness in the province. It gives also a picture of the
social condition of England.
[791] _Een Kort Bericht van de Provintie ofte Landschap Pennsylvania
genaemt; leggende in America; Nu onlangs onder het groote Zegel
van Engeland gegeven aan William Penn, etc._ Rotterdam: Pieter van
Wynbrugge, 1681, 4º, 24 pp. See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, vol. ii. no.
1,227; Trömel, _Bibliotheca Americana_, no. 381.
A copy of this was sold at the Stevens sale (no. 619) in 1881 for £10
5_s._
[792] _Eine nachricht wegen der Landschaft Pennsylvania in America:
welche jungstens unter dem Grossen Siegel in Engelland an William Penn,
etc._ Amsterdam: Christoff Cunraden, 4º, 31 pp. _See Carter-Brown
Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 1,226. A copy is in the Philadelphia Library.
(Loganian, no. Q, 1,262.) [Harrassowitz of Leipzig, in recently
advertising a copy (28 marks) with the imprint, Frankfort, 1683, says
that it originally formed a part of the _Diarium Europæum_, and was
never published separately.—ED.]
[793] _Recit de l’Estat Present des Celebres Colonies de la Virgine, de
Marie-Land, de la Caroline, du nouveau Duché d’York, de Pennsylvania,
et de la Nouvelle Angleterre, situées dans l’Amerique septentrionale,
etc._ Rotterdam: Reinier Leers, 4º, 43 pp. _Carter-Brown Catalogue_,
vol. ii. no. 1,230; Leclerc’s _Bibliotheca Americana_, no. 1,324.
[794] _A Brief Account of the Province of Pennsylvania, lately granted
by the King, under the Great Seal of England, to William Penn and his
Heirs and Assigns._ London: Printed by Benjamin Clark, in George-Yard
in Lombard Street, 4º; also abridged and issued in folio, without place
or date.
There is a copy in Harvard College Library. Cf. Smith’s _Catalogue
of Friends’ Books_, and _Rëcuel de Diverses pieces concernant la
Pensylvanie_. See _infra_, p. 31.
[795] _Plantation Work the Work of this Generation. Written in
True-Love To all such as are weightily inclined to Transplant
themselves and Families to any of the English Plantations in America.
The Most material Doubts and Objections against it being removed, they
may more cheerfully proceed to the Glory and Renown of the God of the
whole Earth, who in all undertakings is to be looked unto, Praised,
and Feared for Ever. Aspice venturo lætetur ut India Sêclo._ London:
Printed for Benjamin Clark, in George-Yard in Lombard Street, 1682, 4º,
18 pp. and title.
Copies of the tract are in the Carter-Brown Library, vol. ii. 1,252,
Friends’ Library, Philadelphia, and in that of the Historical Society
of Pennsylvania.
[796] _The Frame of the Government of the Province of Pennsilvania
in America: Together with certain Laws agreed upon in England by the
Governour and divers Free Men of the aforesaid Province._ Folio, 11
pp., 1682.
Penn’s copy of the above, with his bookplate, is in the library of the
Historical Society of Pennsylvania. It was purchased at the Stevens
sale in 1881 for £10 5_s._ (Stevens’s _Historical Collection_, no. 623;
_Carter-Brown Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 1,251.) There is another copy in
Harvard College Library, from which the annexed fac-simile of title is
taken. Later editions of the _Frame_, containing the alterations made
in 1683, are spoken of on a subsequent page.
[797] _Information and Direction To Such Persons as are inclined
to America, more Especially Those related to the Province of
Pennsylvania._ Folio, 4 pp.
The title of this tract is given in Smith’s _Catalogue of Friends’
Books_, under date of 1681. It is reprinted, with a fac-simile of the
half-title, in _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_, iv. 329, from a
copy in possession of Mr. Henry C. Murphy. An edition was published at
Amsterdam in 1686, which is given on a following page.
[798] There is a copy of the original tract in Harvard College Library.
Its title is as follows,—
_The Articles, Settlement, and Offices of the Free Society of Traders
in Pennsilvania: Agreed upon by divers Merchants and others for the
better Improvement and Government of Trade in that Province._ London:
Printed for Benjamin Clark, folio, 14 pp., 1682.
[799] Copies of it are in the British Museum and in the Friends’
Library, London. It is reprinted in the _Pennsylvania Magazine of
History_, vi. 176, from a transcript obtained from the British Museum.
[800] _A Letter from William Penn, Proprietary and Governour of
Pennsylvania in America, to the Committee of the Free Society of
Traders of that Province, residing in London. To which is added An
Account of the City of Philadelphia, etc._ Printed and Sold by Andrew
Sowle, at the Crooked-Billet in Holloway Lane in Shoreditch, and at
several Stationers’ in London, folio, 10 pp., 1683.
A copy of the edition, with list of property holders, is in the Library
of the New York Historical Society. It has been lately reprinted by
Coleman, of London. Copies of the edition, which does not contain
the list of purchasers, are in the Philadelphia Library and in the
Historical Society of Pennsylvania. It is reprinted in Proud’s _History
of Pennsylvania_, i. 246; Hazard’s _Register of Pennsylvania_, i. 432;
Janney’s _Life of Penn_, p. 238; and in the various editions of Penn’s
collected _Works_. Menzies’ copy sold for $65. Harvard College Library
has a copy without the list; another is in the Carter-Brown Library.
Cf. Rich’s _Catalogue_ of 1832, no. 403.
[801] _Missive van William Penn, Eygenaar en Gouverneur van
Pennsylvania, in America. Geschreven aan de Commissarissen van de
Vrye Societeyt der Handelaars, op de selve Provintie, binnen London
resideerende. Waar by noch gevoeght is een Beschrijving van de
Hooft-Stadt Philadelphia, etc._ Amsterdam: Gedrukt voor Jacob Claus,
1684, 4º, 23 pp.
A copy is in the Carter-Brown Library, _Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 1,293,
and in the _O’Callaghan Catalogue_, no. 1,816 ($20). The one in the
Library of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania lacks the map. It
contains, in addition to what is in the London edition, a letter from
Thomas Paschall, dated from Philadelphia, Feb. 10, 1683 (N. S.), the
first, we believe, dated from that locality. This letter will be found
translated in _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_, vi. 322.
[802] _Beschreibung der in America new-erfunden Provinz Pensylvanien.
Derer Inwohner Gesetz Arth Sitten und Gebrauch: auch samlicher reviren
des Landes sonderlich der haupt-stadt Philadelphia._ (Hamburg.) Henrich
Heuss, 1684, 4º, 32 pp. _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 1,295.
[803] _Recüeil de Diverses pieces concernant la Pensylvanie._ A La
Haye: Chez Abraham Troyel, 1684, 18º, 118 pp.
Of the copy in the Carter-Brown Library, Mr. J. R. Bartlett, its
curator, writes that it is the same with the German. _Carter-Brown
Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 1,295. Another copy is in the possession
of a member of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania; cf. Stevens,
_Historical Collection_, no. 1,539.
[804] _Twee Missiven geschreven uyt Pensilvania, d’ Eene door een
Hollander, woonachtig in Philadelfia, d’ Ander door een Switser,
woonachtig in German Town, Dat is Hoogduytse Stadt. Van den 16 en 26
Maert, 1684, Nieuwe Stijl._ Tot Rotterdam, by Pieter van Alphen, anno
1684, 2 leaves, small 4º.
[805] See Mr. Whitehead’s chapter in the present volume, and Proud’s
_History of Pennsylvania_, i. 226.
[806] We are unable to give any information additional to that
furnished by Mr. Whitehead, except that a copy of this tract sold
for $160 at the Brinley sale, and that the original edition can be
found in the Carter-Brown, Lenox, Historical Society of Pennsylvania,
and Friends’ (of Philadelphia) libraries; cf. _Historical Magazine_,
vi. 265, 304. A biographical sketch of Budd will be found in Mr.
Armstrong’s introduction to the work as published in Gowan’s
_Bibliotheca Americana_, no. 4.
[807] _Missive van Cornelis Bom Geschreven uit de Stadt Philadelphia
in de Provintie van Pennsylvania Leggende op d’ vostzyde van de Zuyd
Revier van Nieuw Nederland Verhalende de groote Voortgank van deselve
Provintie Waerby komt de Getuygenis van Jacob Telner van Amsterdam._
Tot Rotterdam, gedrukt by Pieter van Wijnbrugge, in de Leeuwestraet,
1685.
The title we give is from a copy in the “Library of the Archives” of
the Moravians, Bethlehem, Pa.
[808] _A Further Account of the Province of Pennsylvania and its
Improvements. For the Satisfaction of those that are Adventurers and
enclined to be so._ No titlepage. Signed “William Penn, Worminghurst
Place, 12th of the 10 month, 1685.”
_Tweede Bericht ofte Relaas van William Penn, Eygenaar en Gouverneur
van de Provintie van Pennsylvania, in America, etc._ Amsterdam: By
Jacob Claus, 4º, 20 pp.
Copies of all three editions are in the Carter-Brown Collection.
(_Catalogue_, ii. 1, 320-22). The two English editions are in the
possession of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Extracts from
it are given in Blome’s _Present State of His Majesties Isles and
Territories in America_, London, 1687, pp. 122-134. We do not think
that the work has ever been reprinted. Trömel, _Bibliotheca Americana_,
no. 390, gives the Dutch edition.
[809] _Nader Informatie en Bericht voor die gene die genegen zijn,
om zich na America te begeeven, en in de Provincie van Pensylvania
Geinteresseerd zijn, of zich daar zocken neder te zetten. Mit
een Voorreden behelzende verscheydene aanmerkelzjke zaken vanden
tegenwoordige toestand, en Regeering dier Provincie; Novit voor
dezen in druk geweest: maar nu eerst uytgegeven door Robert Webb
t’ Amsterdam._ By Jacob Claus, 1686, 4º, i+11 pp. _Carter-Brown
Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 1,332.
[810] _A Letter from Doctor More, with Passages out of several Letters
from Persons of Good Credit, Relating to the State and Improvement of
the Province of Pennsilvania._ Published to prevent false Reports.
Printed in the Year 1687.
It is reprinted in _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_, iv. 445, from a
copy in the Carter-Brown Library, _Catalogue_, vol. ii. no. 1,339.
[811] _Some Letters and an Abstract of Letters from Pennsylvania,
Containing the State and Improvement of that Province. Published to
prevent Mis-Reports._ Printed and Sold by Andrew Sowe, at the Crooked
Billott in Holloway Lane in Shoreditch, 1691, 4º, 12 pp.
Penn’s copy is in the Library of the Historical Society of
Pennsylvania; see _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, ii. 1,423. It is reprinted
in _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_, iv. 189.
[812] _A Short Description of Pennsilvania, or, A Relation What things
are known, enjoyed, and like to be discovered in the said Province._
[Imperfect.] By Richard Frame. Printed and sold by William Bradford in
Philadelphia, 1692, 4º, 8 pp.
But one copy is known to have survived, and it is preserved in the
Philadelphia Library. A small edition was printed in fac-simile, in
1867, on the Oakwood Press, a private press of “S. J. Hamilton” (the
late Dr. James Slack). Its introduction is in the form of a letter by
Horatio Gates Jones, Esq.
[813] _Copia Eines Send-Schriebens ausz der neuen Welt, betreffend
die Erzehlung einer gefäherlichen Schifffarth, und glücklichen
Anländung etlicher Christlichen Reisegefehrten, welche zu dem Ende
diese Wallfahrt angetratten, den Glauben an Jesum Christum allda
Ausz-zubreiten._ Gedruckt im Jahr 1695, 4º, 11 pp.
A copy was purchased by the Historical Society of Pennsylvania at the
Stevens sale in 1881 for £26. It has been translated by Professor
Oswald Seidensticker for publication in the _Pennsylvania Magazine of
History_. Professor Seidensticker inclines to the belief that it was
written by Daniel Falkner.
[814] There are two copies of the book in Harvard College Library;
from the map in one the annexed fac-simile is taken. Cf. Wharton’s
paper on provincial literature in _Hist. Soc. Mem._, i. 119; and the
_Carter-Brown Catalogue_, ii. 1,550.
[815] _Umstandige Geographische Beschreibung Der zu
allerletzt-erfundenen Provintz Pensylvaniæ, In denen End Grantzen
Americæ In der West-Welt gelegen durch Franciscum Danielem Pastorium,
etc. Vattern Melchiorem Adamum Pastorium, und andere gute Freunde._
Franckfurt und Leipzig. Zu finden bey Andreas Otto, 1700, 16º, 140 pp.
The Harvard College copy is dated 1704; cf. _Brinley Catalogue_, no.
3,077; and _O’Callaghan Catalogue_, no. 1,807, with a _Continuatio_ of
1702 ($43 00).
[816] _Curieuse Nachricht von Pensylvania in Norden-America welche auf
Begehren guter Freunde, etc._ Von Daniel Falknern, Professore, Burgern
und Pilgrim allda. Franckfurt und Leipzig. Zu finden bey Andreas Otto,
Buchhandlern, 1702, 16º, 58 pp.
[817] It is worth while to make record of two tracts of this early
period whose titles might deceive the student with the belief that they
pertained to the subject, but they do not. The first is a burlesque
indorsement of the Protestant Reconciler, entitled _Three Letters of
Thanks to the Protestant Reconciler_: _1. From the Anabaptists at
Munster; 2. From the Congregations in New England; 3. From the Quakers
in Pennsylvania._ London: Benjamin Took, 1683, 4º, 26 pp.
The other is a Letter to _William Penn, with His Answer_, London,
1688, 4º, 10 pp; again the same year in 20 pp.; and in Dutch, 16 pp.,
Amsterdam, 1689.
This letter, by Sir William Popple, is addressed “To the Honourable
William Penn, Esq., Proprietor and Governor of Pennsylvania.” It is a
friendly criticism on his conduct while living in England, after his
return from America. It has nothing to do with his province but is of
a biographical nature. Proud prints the correspondence in his _History
of Pennsylvania_ (i. 314). It has been catalogued as connected with the
history of the province. Cf. _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, vol. ii., nos.
1,363 and 1,390. Both of the London editions are in the possession of
the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.
The student may also need to be warned against a forged letter of
Cotton Mather, about a plot to capture Penn. _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._,
1870, p. 329.
[818] _A Journal or Historical Account of his Life, Travels,
Sufferings, etc._ London, 1694, folio. Again, London, 1709; 1765; 7th
ed., 1852, with notes by Wilson Armistead. Allibone’s _Dictionary_, i.
625; Sabin’s _Dictionary_, vi. 25, 352.
[819] London, 1713; Dublin, 1715; London, 1715, 1777; Dublin, 1820; and
in two different Friends’ libraries, 1833 and 1838. Sabin, vi. 21,873.
[820] _Apology for the Church and People of God called in derision
Quakers; Wherein they are vindicated from those that accuse them of
Disorder and Confusion on the one hand, and from such as calumniate
them with Tyranny and Imposition on the other; shewing that as
the true and pure Principles of the Gospel are restored by their
Testimony, so is also the ancient apostolick order of the Church of
Christ re-established among them, and settled upon its Right Basis and
Foundation._ By Robert Barclay, London, 1676, 1 vol., 4º.
There have been various later editions in English and German. Masson
calls this book by far the best-reasoned exposition of the sect’s early
principles.
[821] _A Collection of the Sufferings of the People called Quakers, for
the testimony of a good Conscience._ London, 1753, 2 vols., folio.
[822] _The History of the Rise, Increase, and Progress of the
Christian People called Quakers, intermixed with several remarkable
occurrences. Written originally in Low Dutch by W. S., and by himself
translated into English._ London, 1722, folio, 752 pp. There are later
editions,—London, 1725; Philadelphia, 1725; Burlington, N. J., 1775;
again, 1795, 1799-1800; Philadelphia, 1811; again, 1833, in Friends’
Library; New York, 1844, etc. The Philadelphia edition of 1725 bears
the imprint of Samuel Keimer. It was this book which Franklin, in his
_Autobiography_, tells us he and Meredith worked upon just after they
had established themselves in business. Forty sheets, he says, were
from their press.
[823] [This was published at Amsterdam in 1696, and was translated into
English, with a letter by George Keith, vindicating himself, the same
year; and also into German. Sabin’s _Dictionary_, v. 17,584. The next
year (1797) Francis Bugg’s _Picture of Quakerism_ was printed as “A
modest Corrective of Gerrard Croese” (Sabin, iii. 9,072); Bugg having,
since about 1684, joined their opponents. _Brinley Catalogue_, no.
3,503.—ED.]
[824] _Portraiture of Quakerism_, 3 vols., London, 1806; New York, same
date.
[825] Four vols., Philadelphia, 1860-67.
[826] London, 1876.
[827] _An Examen of Parts relating to the Society of Friends in a
recent work by Robert Barclay, entitled, etc._ Philadelphia, 1876.
[828] See also _Brinley Catalogue,_ no. 3,479, for a variety of titles;
and Bohn’s _Lowndes_, p. 2017.
[829] It may not, however, be out of place to mention here the chief
reasons on which the followers of Fox base their objections to the
manner in which it is customary to speak of the first Quakers who
visited New England. It is generally represented that it was the
behavior of these early ministers which caused their persecution; but
before a European Quaker had set foot on Massachusetts the court had
denounced them, and in October, 1656, a law was passed which spoke of
them as a “cursed sect of heretickes.” It is also customary to speak
of the executions of Quakers in Boston in connection with certain
acts of indecency committed by women who were either laboring under
mental aberrations or believed that they were fulfilling a divine
command, leaving on the mind of the reader the impression that the
capital law was called into existence to correct such abuses. No
such acts were committed until after the capital law had fallen into
disuse. Nor is it clear, from printed authorities, that the death
penalty was only inflicted after every possible means had been tried
by the Massachusetts authorities to rid themselves of their unwelcome
visitors. The language of the law of 1658, which declared that if a
banished Quaker returned he or she should suffer death, does not show
that it supplemented that of 1657, by which punishments increasing in
severity were visited on Quakers upon their first, second, and third
return. Neither will the practice under the law of 1658 justify this
interpretation. The penalties of the law of 1657 had not been exhausted
in the cases of Mary Dyer, William Robinson, Marmaduke Stevenson, and
William Ledera, when they were hanged.
[830] See _Memoirs of Long Island Historical Society_, vol. i.
[831] London, 1726, 2 vols., folio; London, 1771, 1 vol., royal folio;
London, 1782, 5 vols., 8º; London, 1825, 3 vols., 8º.
[832] A list of the most important of these, with references to where
they will be found, is printed in _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_,
vi. 368.
[833] London, 1813, 2 vols.; Dover, N. H., 1820; new edition, with
preface by Forster, 1849. It is reviewed by Jeffrey in _Edinburgh
Review_, xxi. 444.
[834] Philadelphia, 1852; cf. Sabin’s _Dictionary_, vol. ix. p. 221.
Mr. Janney was appointed Indian Agent by President Grant, 1869. He died
April 30, 1880.
[835] London, 1851; again, 1856. It is reviewed in the _Edinburgh
Review_, xciv. 229, and _Christian Observer_, li. 818.
[836] Two vols., 1791. It is of some interest to note another French
life by C. Vincent, Paris, 1877, and a Dutch life by H. van Lil,
Amsterdam, 1820-25, 2 vols.
[837] 1. ANSWERS TO MACAULAY.—_Defence of William Penn from Charges,
etc., of T. B. Macaulay_, by Henry Fairbairn. Philadelphia, 1849, 8º,
38 pp.
2. _William Penn and T. B. Macaulay_, by W. E. Forster. Revised for the
American edition by the author. Philadelphia, 1850, 8º, 48 pp. This
first appeared as an Introduction to an edition of Clarkson’s _Life of
W. Penn_, London, 1850.
3. _William Penn_, par L. Vullieum. Paris, 1855, 8º, 83 pp.
4. _Inquiry into the Evidence relating to the Charges brought by Lord
Macaulay against W. Penn_, by John Paget. Edinburgh, 1858, 12º, 138
pp. Cf. also _Westminster Review_, liv. 117; and _Eclectic Magazine_,
xxiii. 115; xxxix. 120. Sabin’s _Dictionary_, 49,743.
ADDITIONAL WORKS.—_Memorials of the Life and Times of_ [Admiral] _Sir
W. Penn_, by Granville Penn. London, 1833, 2 vols. 8º. Cf. also P. S.
P. Conner’s _Sir William Penn_, Philadelphia, 1876, and “The Father of
Penn not a Baptist,” in _Historical Magazine_, xvi. 228.
“The Private Life and Domestic Habits of W. Penn,” by Joshua F. Fisher,
in the _Memoirs of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania_, vol. iii.
part ii. p. 65 (1836); published also separately.
“Memoir of Part of the Life of W. Penn,” by Mr. Lawton, a
contemporaneous writer, in Ibid., p. 213.
“Fragments of an Apology for Himself,” by W. Penn, in Ibid., p. 233.
“Penn and Logan Correspondence.” Edited by Edward Armstrong, in vols.
ix. and x. of _Memoirs of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania_.
These volumes cover only the years between 1700 and 1711; they also
contain Mr. J. J. Smith’s Memoir of the Penn Family, reprinted in
_Lippincott’s Magazine_, v. 149. Cf. _Magazine of American History_,
ii. 437; also James Coleman’s _Pedigree and General Notes of the Penn
Family_, 1871.
“William Penn’s Travels in Holland and Germany,” by Oswald
Seidensticker. See _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_, ii. 237. Penn’s
journal of these travels will be found in his collected works.
_The Penns and the Penningtons_, and _The Fells of Swarthmore Hall_,
by Maria Webb, are two interesting books throwing light on the Quaker
society in which Penn moved.
_Calvert and Penn; or, the Growth of Civil and Religious Liberty in
America_, by Brantz Mayer. Delivered before the Historical Society of
Pennsylvania, April 8, 1852. Baltimore, 1852, 8º, 49 pp.
John Stoughton’s _William Penn, the Founder of Pennsylvania_. London,
1882. This book, called out by the Bi-Centenary of Pennsylvania, is
founded on the standard Lives, but adds some new matter.
[838] Coleman, James, bookseller. _Catalogue of Original Deeds,
Charters, Copies of Royal Grants, petitions, Original Letters, etc.,
of William Penn and his Family._ July, 1870. Also Supplement. London,
1870, 8º, 32, 12 pp.
Also see _The Penn Papers_. _Description of a large Collection of
Original Letters, Manuscript Documents, Charters, Grants, Printed
Papers, rare Books and Pamphlets relating to the Celebrated William
Penn, to the early History of Pennsylvania, and incidentally to other
parts of America, dating from the latter part of the 17th to the end of
the 18th century, lately in the possession of a surviving descendant of
William Penn, now the property of Edward G. Allen._ London, 1870.
Also see _Original Deeds and Charters, State and Boundary Documents,
Letters, Maps, and Charts, also Books and Papers relating to America,
the Penn Family, and the Quakers, many of them from the Penn Library_.
July, 1876. London, 1876, 8º, 24 pp.
[839] The published address delivered upon their presentation to the
Historical Society is entitled _Proceedings of the Historical Society
of Pennsylvania on the Presentation of the Penn Papers, and Address
of Craig Biddle_, March 10, 1873, Philadelphia, 1873, 8º, 30 pp. Cf.
_Catalogue of Paintings, etc., belonging to the Pennsylvania Historical
Society_, no. 177.
[840] Mr. Whitehead informs me that the papers in the Library of the
New Jersey Historical Society consist of 17 parts (no. 10 missing), and
are called, “The History of the Colonies of New Jersey and Pennsylvania
in America. From the time of their first discovery to the year 1721.
Together with an Appendix containing several occurrences that have
happened since, down to the present time. Undertaken at the desire of
the Yearly Meeting of the people called Quakers, of the said Colonies,
and published by their order. By——. Psal. cv. 12. 13. 14, when they
were but a few, etc.” Several of the passages, marked “Transfer to
History of Friends,” correspond to the Philadelphia manuscript, which
is apparently the portion designated as the second part in the author’s
scheme, as thus detailed by himself in the New Jersey manuscript: “The
History of the Province of Pennsylvania in two parts. Part I. The time
and manner of the grants of territories, the arrival of settlers, a
general view of the original state of the country and of the public
proceedings in legislation, and other matters for the first forty years
after the settlement made under William Penn. Part II. The introduction
and some account of the religious progress of the people called Quakers
therein, including the like account respecting the same people in New
Jersey as constituting one Yearly Meeting.”
[841] _The History of Pennsylvania in North America, from ... 1681
till after the year 1742, with an Introduction respecting the Life of
W. Penn, ... the Religious Society of the People called Quakers, with
the First Rise ... of West New Jersey, and ... the Dutch and Swedes in
Delaware; to which is added a Brief Description of the said Province_,
1760-1770. Philadelphia, 1797-1798.
[842] A biographical notice of him by the Rev. Charles West Thomson
will be found in vol. i. of the _Memoirs of the Historical Society of
Pennsylvania_ (2d ed. p. 417), together with some verses which show
the sympathies of a Loyalist. He was born in 1728, and died in 1813. A
Portrait after a pencil sketch is noted in the _Catalogue of Paintings,
etc., belonging to the Pennsylvania Historical Society_, no. 86.
[843] Philadelphia, 1829.
[844] London, 1854; vol. i. appearing in 1850. The work was never
completed.
[845] Harrisburg, 1876; 2d ed., Philadelphia, 1880.
[846] London, 1757, 2 vols., 8º.
[847] London, 1770, 2 Vols., 8º.
[848] [This book has passed through several editions,—1830, with
lithographic illustrations; 1844, 1850, 1857, and 1868, with woodcuts.
A tribute to Mr. Watson (who was born June 13, 1779, and died Dec.
23, 1861), by Charles Deane, is in _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, v.
207; and Benjamin Dorr published _A Memoir of John Fanning Watson_,
Philadelphia, 1861, with a portrait. Mr. Willis P. Hazard’s _Annals
of Philadelphia_, 1879, supplements Mr. Watson’s book. The local
antiquarian interest will be abundantly satisfied with Mr. Townsend
Ward’s papers on the old landmarks of the town, which have appeared
in the _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_, though much in them
necessarily fails of association with the early years with which we
are dealing. This is likewise true of Thompson Westcott’s _Historic
Buildings of Philadelphia_, 1877; cf. the papers on old Philadelphia in
_Harper’s Monthly_, 1876; cf. _An Explanation of the Map of the City
and Liberties of Philadelphia_. By John Reed. Philadelphia, 1794 and
1846.—ED.]
[849] Philadelphia, 1867, 12º, 379 pp.
[850] Norristown, 1859.
[851] Philadelphia, 1862. See Memoir of Dr. Smith in _Pennsylvania Mag.
of Hist._, vi. 182.
[852] Philadelphia, 1877.
[853] Doylestown, Pa., 1876, 8º, 875 + 54 pp.
[854] It is unfortunate that a book of such merit should have been
given to the public in so objectionable a form. It is a 4º, 782 +
44 pages (Philadelphia, 1881), profusely illustrated with pictures
calculated to gratify the vanity of living persons and to mislead
students as to the value of the work.
[855] _Annals of Pennsylvania, from the Discovery of the Delaware_, by
Samuel Hazard, 1609-1682, Philadelphia, 1850, 8º, 664 pp. An excellent
compilation, containing nearly all the documentary information on the
subject, arranged in chronological order.
A catalogue of the papers relating to Pennsylvania and Delaware in
the State-Paper Office, London, was printed in the _Memoirs of the
Pennsylvania Historical Society_, vol. iv. part ii. p. 236.
[856] _Votes and Proceedings of the House of Representatives of the
Province of Pennsylvania. Beginning the Fourth Day of December, 1682._
Volume the First, in Two Parts. Philadelphia, 1752. This collection was
continued down to the Revolution. It is contained in six folio volumes.
The first three are from the press of Franklin and Hall. They are
always known as “Votes of the Assembly.”
[857] The first ten volumes of the series known as the _Colonial
Records_ bear the title of _Minutes of the Provincial Council of
Pennsylvania, from the Organization_ [1683] _to the Termination of
the Proprietary Government_; the last six: _Minutes of the Supreme
Executive Council of Pennsylvania from its Organization to the
Termination of the Revolution_. They contain, however, the Minutes
down to 1790. The publication of this series was begun by the State in
1837, the American Philosophical Society and the Historical Society of
Pennsylvania having petitioned the Legislature to adopt measures for
this end. After three volumes were issued (Harrisburg, 1838-1840) the
publication was suspended. In 1851, at the request of the Historical
Society, the matter was again brought before the Legislature by Edward
Armstrong, Esq., a member of the Society, then a delegate to the
Legislature. The sixteen volumes of the _Colonial Records_ and twelve
of the _Pennsylvania Archives_ were issued between the years 1852 and
1856. The volumes issued in 1838-1840 were reprinted in 1852, and an
index volume to both works in 1860. The latter does not apply to the
volume of the Records published in 1838-1840.
[858] _Pennsylvania Archives, selected and arranged from Original
Documents in the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth._
By Samuel Hazard, Commencing 1664. 12 vols., 8º. Harrisburg and
Philadelphia, 1852-1856. To Mr. Samuel Hazard, who was also the author
of the _Annals of Pennsylvania_ and publisher of _Hazard’s Register of
Pennsylvania_ (16 vols., 8º, Philadelphia, 1828-1835), the students of
history are greatly indebted for the preservation of some of the most
important documents relating to the history of the State.
[859] _Charter to William Penn and Laws of the Province of
Pennsylvania, 1682 and 1700; preceded by Duke of York’s Laws in Force
from the year 1676 to the year 1682. Published under the direction of
John Blair Linn, Sec. of Commonwealth, Compiled and edited by Staughton
George, Benjamin M. Nead, and Thomas McCamant._ Harrisburg, 1879, 8º,
614 pp.
Appendix A of this volume contains a compilation of the laws, etc.,
establishing the Courts of Judicature; it is by Staughton George.
Appendix B contains Historical Notes of the Early Government and
Legislative Councils and Assemblies of Pennsylvania; it is by Mr. Nead.
Both are valuable pieces of work; but we do not agree with Mr. Nead
that the laws printed and agreed upon in England, and the written ones
prepared by Penn and submitted to the Assembly that met at Upland,
December, 1682, were both passed. The passage in Penn’s letter of Dec.
16, 1682, which reads, “the laws were agreed upon more fully worded,”
indicates that the printed series was superseded by the written one.
[860] _Laws of Pennsylvania._ Philadelphia, 1810 (Beoren’s edition).
The second volume of this edition contains an elaborate “note” on
land-titles; it will be found on pp. 105-261. It was prepared by Judge
Charles Smith.
_View of the Land-Laws of Pennsylvania, with Notes of its Early History
and Legislation._ By Thomas Sargeant. Philadelphia, 1838, 8º, xiii +
203 pp.
_Address before the Law Academy._ By Peter McCall. Philadelphia, 1838.
A valuable historical essay.
_Essay on the History and Nature of Original Titles of Land in
Pennsylvania._ By Charles Huston. Philadelphia, 1849, 8º, xx + 484 pp.
_Syllabus of Law of Land-Office Titles in Pennsylvania._ By Joel Jones.
Philadelphia, 1850, 12º, xxiv + 264.
_The Common Law of Pennsylvania._ By George Sharswood. A lecture before
the Law Academy. Philadelphia, 1856.
_Equity in Pennsylvania._ A lecture before the Law Academy of
Philadelphia, Feb. 11, 1868. By William Henry Rawle. With an Appendix,
being the _Register Book of Governor Keith’s Court of Chancery_.
Philadelphia, 1868, 8º, 93 + 46 pp.
_A Practical Treatise on the Law of Ground-Rents in Pennsylvania._ By
Richard M. Cadwalader. Philadelphia, 1879, 8º, 356 pp.
_An Essay on Original Land-Titles in Philadelphia._ By Lawrence Lewis,
Jr. Philadelphia, 1880, 8º, 266 pp.
_The Courts of Pennsylvania in the Seventeenth Century._ Read before
the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, March 14, 1881. By Lawrence
Lewis, Jr. See _Pennsylvania Magazine of History_, v. 141, also,
separately.
_Some Contrasts in the Growth of Pennsylvania and English Law._ A
Lecture before the Law Department of the University of Pennsylvania,
Oct. 3, 1881. By William Henry Rawle. Philadelphia, 1881, 8º, 78 pp.,
2d ed., 32 pp., 1882.
[861] A number of addresses were delivered before this Society. That of
J. N. Barker, delivered in 1827, is the most valuable of the series,
and is entitled _Sketches of the Primitive Settlements of the River
Delaware_, Philadelphia, 1828.
[862] That no doubt should exist regarding the accuracy of these dates,
we have had Penn’s letter to the Lords of Plantation in the State-Paper
Office, London, examined, and in it the 24th is clearly written. This
is confirmed by the original draft of his letter to the Free Society of
Traders, in which the same date of arrival is given. The “New Castle
County old Records transcribed,” quoted by Hazard, give the 27th as
the time of his arrival before that town, and the 28th as the day on
which he took official possession. These statements are verified by the
Breviate of Penn vs. Lord Baltimore, in which the original Newcastle
Records appear to have been quoted, since the volumes and folios
referred to differ from those given by Hazard.
[863] This conclusion has been reached by examining the evidence we
have in strict chronological order. There is nothing to show that Penn
met the Indians in council until May, 1683. At this conference the
Indians either failed to understand him, or refused to sell him land.
His next meeting with them was on June 23, 1683. He then purchased land
from them, and the promises of friendship quoted on a former page were
exchanged. It is a significant fact that while there is scarcely any
allusion to the Indians in his letters prior to the meeting of June 23,
subsequent to that time they are full of descriptions of them, and of
accounts of his intercourse with them.
[864] [The elm-tree known as the Treaty-tree which was long venerated
as the one under which the interview was held, was blown down in 1810,
and a picture of it taken in 1809 is preserved in the Historical
Society. (Cf. _Catalogue of Paintings, etc., belonging to the
Historical Society_, no. 167. Cf. views in Gay’s _Popular History of
the United States_, ii. 493; Watson’s _Annals of Philadelphia_; one
of the latter part of the last century in _Pennsylvania Magazine of
History_, iv. 186.) For the monument on the spot, see Lossing’s _Field
Book of the Revolution_, ii. 254. It is well known that Benjamin
West made the scene of the treaty the subject of a large historical
painting. The original first deed given by the Indians to Markham is in
the possession of the Historical Society. Cf. _Catalogue of Paintings,
etc., belonging to the Historical Society_, no. 174.
William Rawle’s address before the Pennsylvania Historical Society in
1825 was upon Penn’s method of dealing with the Indians as compared
with the customs obtaining in the other colonies. (Cf. _Historical
Magazine_, vi. 64.) Fac-similes of the marks of many Indian chiefs,
as put to documents from 1682 to 1785, are given in _Pennsylvania
Archives_, vol. i.—ED.]
[865] [Cf. also _Pennsylvania Archives_, 2d series, vol. vii. There
is a map illustrating the boundary dispute in _Pennsylvania Archives_
(1739), i. 595; cf. Neill’s _Terra Maria_, chap. v., Hazard’s _Register
of Pennsylvania_, ii. 200, and Mr. Brantley’s chapter in the present
volume.—ED.]
[866] S. R. Gardiner’s _Prince Charles and the Spanish Marriage_, i.
164.
[867] S. R. Gardiner’s _Personal Government of Charles I._, ii. 290.
[868] In the Maryland Historical Society are preserved the original
manuscript records of courts baron and leet held in St. Clement’s manor
at different times from 1659 to 1672.]
[869] _Records of the English Province of the Society of Jesus._
London, 1878, iii. 362.
[870] [See _Memorial History of Boston_, i. p. 278.—ED.]
[871] At a session of the Assembly held in Januuary, 1648, an incident
occurred which annalists have generally deemed worthy of mention as the
first instance of a demand of political rights for women. Miss Margaret
Brent—who was the administratix of Governor Calvert, and as such held
to be the attorney, in fact, of Lord Baltimore—applied to the Assembly
to have a vote in the House for herself, and another as his lordship’s
attorney.
[Illustration]
Upon the refusal of her demand, the lady protested in form against all
the proceedings of the House. The Assembly afterwards defended her
from the censures passed by Lord Baltimore upon her management of his
affairs in the Province.
[872] [See Vol. IV.—ED.]
[873] See chapter x.—ED.
[874] See chapter xii.—ED.
[875] [It is reprinted in the _Magazine of American History_, i.
118.—ED.]
[876] A copy of the original, which is very rare, is in the British
Museum. It was reprinted by Munsell, of Albany, as No. 1 of Shea’s
_Early Southern Tracts_. [It is suggested in the preface of the
reprint, which was edited by Colonel Brantz Mayer, that it “was
perhaps prepared by Cecilius Calvert, Lord Baltimore, from the letters
of his brothers, Leonard and George Calvert, who went out with the
expedition.” It was also reprinted in the _Historical Magazine_,
October, 1865—ED.]
[877] This second tract was reprinted by Sabin, of New York, in 1865
[under the editing of Francis L. Hawks. A perfect copy should have a
map, engraved by T. Cecill, “Noua Terræ-Mariæ tabula.” It is often
wanting, as in the Harvard College copy; it is, however, in the
Library of Congress copy. Sabin reproduced it full size, and a reduced
fac-simile of it is given in Scharf’s _History of Maryland_, i. 259.
Another is given in the text. The _Chalmers Catalogue_ says that at the
time of the boundary disputes between Maryland and Pennsylvania the
only copy to be found was in the Sir Hans Sloane Collection. See the
_Sparks Catalogue_, and the _Huth Catalogue_, iii. 926.—ED.]
[878] [Dr. Dalrymple was born in Baltimore, in 1817, and was for
twenty-four years the Corresponding Secretary of the Maryland
Historical Society. He is said to have possessed the largest private
library (over 14,000 volumes) south of Pennsylvania. He died Oct. 30,
1881.—_Necrology_ (1881) _of the Numismatic and Antiquarian Society of
Philadelphia_.—ED.]
[879] [In 1844 Georgetown College presented to the Maryland Historical
Society a copy of McSherry’s transcript of the _Relatio Itineris_; and
in 1847 Dr. N. C. Brooks made a translation from this copy, which was
later printed in _Force’s Tracts_, iv. No. 12. The Latin text, with a
revision of Brooks’s version, was printed privately in the _Woodstock
Letters_, in 1872. Two years later (1874) the Maryland Historical
Society reprinted it as stated in the text, following, however, the
original McSherry transcript, which had been transferred to Loyola
College, Baltimore. This, however, then wanted the concluding pages,
but in 1875 the whole was found, which necessitated the printing of
a supplement to the _Fund Publication_ of the Society (No. 7) which
contained it. The later version of Converse is largely reprinted in
Scharf’s _Maryland_, i. 69, etc.
Various accounts of Father White have been printed: B. U. Campbell’s
in the _Metropolitan Catholic Almanac_, 1841, and in the _United
States Catholic Magazine_, vol. vii. Mr. Campbell also read before
the Historical Society a paper on _Early Missions in Maryland_, and
printed a chapter on the same subject in the _United States Catholic
Magazine_ in 1846. There is also an account of Father White, by Richard
H. Clarke, in the _Baltimore Metropolitan_, iv. (1856), and a sketch
in the _Woodstock Letters_. Upon all these is based the account in the
_Fund Publication_ already mentioned. Other accounts of the Maryland
missions may be found in Shea’s _Early Catholic Missions_; and in Henry
Foley’s _Records of the English Province of the Society of Jesus_,
London, 1878, vol. iii. Mr. Neill has used this last in his tract,
_Light Thrown by the Jesuits upon Hitherto Obscure Points of Early
Maryland History_, Minneapolis. See also his _Eng. Col._, ch. xv.—ED.]
[880] Reprinted in Force’s _Historical Tracts_, vol. ii. There is a
copy of it in Harvard College Library.
[881] The documents transmitted by Bennett and Matthews to the
Protector, during their contest with Lord Baltimore in 1656, may be
found in Thurloe’s _State Papers_, v. 482-486. Copies of Strong’s and
Langford’s rare tracts are in the Boston Athenæum.
[882] Reprinted in Force’s _Historical Tracts_, vol. iii. There is a
copy of it in Harvard College Library. See Sabin, viii. 30276.
[883] Reprinted in Gowan’s _Bibliotheca Americana_, No. 5. New
York, 1869. [This edition has a map, with introduction and notes by
John Gilmary Shea. It has again been reissued as one of the _Fund
Publications_ of the Maryland Historical Society.—ED.]
[884] It is reprinted in Scharf’s _Maryland_, i. 174.
[885] [The early Quakers of Maryland have been the subject of two
publications of the Historical Society: one by J. Saurin Norris, issued
in 1862; and the other, Dr. Samuel A. Harrison’s _Wenlock Christison
and the early Friends in Talbot County_, 1878. See also Neill’s _Terra
Mariæ_, ch. iv. On Wenlock Christison see _Memorial History of Boston_,
i. 187.—ED.]
[886] This manuscript volume is in the possession of the Maryland
Historical Society. An Index to the Calendar was printed in 1861.
[887] In 1860 another valuable report to the governor on the condition
of the public records was made by the Rev. Ethan Allen, D. D.
[888] Cf. Preface to Alexander’s Calendar.
[889] Published in the Master of the Rolls series. [The Peabody Index
is described in Lewis Mayer’s account of the library, 1854.—ED.]
[890] The Maryland Historical Society has a manuscript copy of some of
the Sloane manuscripts in the British Museum, pertaining to the first
Lord Baltimore and Maryland. Mr. Alexander gave to the State Library at
Annapolis some of the manuscripts relating to Maryland in Sion College,
London. A number of the Maryland papers in the state-paper office have
been published in Scharf’s _History of Maryland_, and in the _Report
on the Virginia and Maryland Boundary Line, 1873_. The Journal of the
Dutch Embassy to Maryland in 1659, and some of the communications
between the Maryland Council and the Dutch at New Amstel have been
published in _Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State
of New York_, ii. 84 _et seq._ The _1880 Index_, p. 246, to accessions
of manuscripts in the British Museum shows various papers of Cecil
Calvert.
[891] A description of the occupations of the planters of Maryland,
and of the culture of tobacco by them in the year 1680, is contained
in the “Journal of a voyage to New York and a Tour in several of the
American colonies,” by Jaspar Dankers and Peter Sluyter, published in
the _Memoirs of the Long Island Historical Society_, vol. i. pp. 194,
214-216, 218-221.
[892] An article in _Lippincott’s Magazine_ for July, 1871, describes
the topography and the present condition of St. Mary’s.
[893] There is a fine portrait of the first Lord Baltimore in the
gallery of the Earl of Verulam at Glastonbury, England. It was painted
by Mytens, court painter to James I. An engraving from it is in the
possession of the Maryland Historical Society. In 1882 a copy of this
portrait was presented to the State of Maryland by John W. Garrett,
Esq. It is engraved in McSherry’s _Maryland_, p. 21, as from an
original in the great gallery of Sir Francis Bacon; and again in S.
H. Gay’s _Popular History of the United States_, i. 485. An engraved
portrait of Cecilius, second Lord Baltimore, at the age of fifty-one,
made by Blotling, in 1657, is in the possession of the Maryland
Historical Society. Engravings of these portraits of the two lords are
given in the present chapter.
The Baltimore arms are those of Calverts, quartered with Crosslands.
The Calvert arms are barry of six, or and sable, over all a bend
counterchanged. Crosslands: quarterly, argent and gules, over all a
cross bottony counterchanged. Lord Baltimore used: quarterly, first and
fourth paly of six, or and sable, a bend counterchanged; second and
third, quarterly, argent and gules, a cross bottony counterchanged.
_Crest_: on a ducal coronet proper, two pennons, the dexter or, the
sinister sable; the staves, gules. _Supporters_: two leopards, guardant
coward, proper. _Motto: Fatti maschii, parole femine._
The first great seal of the Province was lost during Ingle’s Rebellion;
and in 1648 the Proprietary sent out another seal, slightly different.
This seal had engraven on one side the figure of the Proprietary in
armor on horseback, with drawn sword and a helmet with a great plume
of feathers, the trappings being adorned with the family arms. The
inscription round about this side was: _Cecilius absolutus dominus
Terra Mariæ et Avaloniæ Baro de Baltimore_. On the other side of the
seal was engraven a scutcheon with the family arms; namely, six pieces
impaled with a band dexter counterchanged, quartered with a cross
bottony, and counterchanged; the whole scutcheon being supported with
a fisherman on one side and a ploughman on the other (in the place of
the family leopards), standing upon a scroll, whereon the Baltimore
motto was inscribed; namely, _Fatti maschii, parole femine_. Above the
scutcheon was a count-palatine’s cap, and over that a helmet, with the
crest of the family arms; namely, a ducal crown with two half bannerets
set upright. Behind the scutcheon and supporters was engraven a large
ermine mantle, and the inscription about this side of the seal was,
_Scuto bonæ voluntatis tuæ coronasti nos_. In 1657 Lord Baltimore
sent out another seal, similar in design, which was used till 1705.
Subsequent changes were made in the seal and arms of the Province and
State, but in 1876 the last described side of the Great Seal sent out
in 1648 was adopted as the arms of Maryland. A full account of the
pedigree of the Calverts will be found in _An Appeal to the citizens of
Maryland, from the legitimate descendants of the Baltimore family_, by
Charles Browning, Baltimore, 1821. [Fuller’s _Worthies of England_ and
Anthony Wood’s _Athenæ Oxoniensis_ give us important facts regarding
the first Lord Baltimore. See John G. Morris’s _The Lords Baltimore,
1874_, No. 8 of the _Fund Publications_ of the Historical Society; and
Neill’s _English Colonization in North America_, ch. xi.—ED.]
[894] [He undertook it at the instance of Sir John Dalrymple. See his
chapters ix. and xv. See, also, his _Introduction to the History of the
Revolt of the American Colonies_. Chalmers had come to Maryland in 1763
to give legal assistance to an uncle in pursuing a land claim. Many of
his papers were bought at his sale by Sparks, and are now in Harvard
College Library.—ED.]
[895] [Compare George William Brown’s _Origin and Growth of Civil
Liberty in Maryland_, a discourse before the Historical Society in
1850. And Brantz Mayer’s _Calvert and Penn_,—a discourse before the
Pennsylvania Historical Society in 1852.—ED.]
[896] [Bozman was born in 1757 and died in 1823. He had published in
1811 a preliminary _Sketch of the History of Maryland during the three
first years after its Settlement_. Some of the old records, supposed to
have been lost since he used them, were found at Annapolis in 1875, and
serve to show the accuracy with which he copied them. Gay’s _Popular
History of the United States_, i. 515.—ED.]
[897] New Series, vol. ix.
[898] [Following Chalmers, it had been often stated that the Assembly
of 1649 was Catholic by majority; but four or five years before this
publication of Davis, Mr. Sebastian F. Streeter, in his _Maryland
Two Hundred Years Ago_, had claimed that the Assembly which passed
the Toleration Act was by majority Protestant, for which, so late as
January, 1869, he was taken to task in the _Southern Review_ by Richard
McSherry, M.D., who reprinted his paper in his _Essays and Lectures_.
The question of the relations of Protestant and Catholic to the spirit
of toleration is discussed by E. D. Neill, in his “Lord Baltimore and
Toleration in Maryland,” in the _Contemporary Review_, September, 1876;
by B. F. Brown, in his _Early Religious History of Maryland: Maryland
not a Roman Catholic Colony_, 1876; in “Early Catholic Legislation,
1634-49, on Religious Freedom,” in the _New Englander_, November, 1878.
The Rev. Ethan Allen, in his _Who were the Early Settlers of Maryland?_
published by the Historical Society in 1865, aimed to show that the
vast majority were Protestant. Kennedy also had asserted that the
Assembly of 1649 was Protestant.—ED.]
[899] [He says in his preface that he picked up his threads from the
printed sources in the Library of Congress while he was one of the
Secretaries of President Johnson.—ED.]
[900] [The principal of Mr. Neill’s other contributions are _The
Founders of Maryland as portrayed in Manuscripts, Provincial Records,
and early Documents_, published by Munsell, of Albany, in 1876; and
_English Colonization of America_, chapters xi., xii., and xiii., where
he first printed Captain Henry Fleet’s Journal of 1631. Streeter, in
his Papers, etc., gives an account of Fleet.—Mr. Neill also printed
_Maryland not a Roman Catholic Colony_, Minneapolis, 1875.—ED.]
[901] A manuscript copy of this charter, both in Latin and English,
is in the Maryland Historical Society. Many writers, including the
Rev. E. D. Neill, so late as 1871, in his _English Colonization in
the Seventeenth Century_, have made the mistake of supposing that the
charter of Maryland was copied from the charter of Carolina, granted
in 1629 to Sir Robert Heath. The last two named charters were both
copied from the charter of Avalon, issued in 1623. [The Maryland
charter of June 20, 1632, is printed by Scharf, i. 53, following Thomas
Bacon’s translation, as given in his edition of the Laws, Annapolis,
1765; where is also the original Latin, which is likewise in Hazard’s
_Collection_, i. 327. Lord Baltimore had printed it in London, in 1723,
in a collection of the Acts, 1692-1715,—an edition which Bacon had
never found in the Province. See the _Brinley Catalogue_, No. 3657.
The Philadelphia Library has an edition printed in Philadelphia in
1718.—ED.]
[902] [The Rev. John G. Morris, D.D., began a Bibliography of Maryland
in the _Historical Magazine_ (April and May, 1870), but it was never
carried beyond “Baltimore.” If a topical index is furnished to
Sabin’s _Dictionary_, when completed, it may supply the deficiency;
but in the mean time the articles “Baltimore” and “Maryland” can be
consulted. Of the local works references may be made to a few: George
A. Hanson’s _Old Kent_, 1876, is largely genealogical, and not lucidly
arranged. T. W. Griffith published in 1821 his _Sketches of the Early
History of Maryland_, and in 1841 his _Annals of Baltimore_. J. T.
Scharf published his _Chronicles of Baltimore_ in 1874. David Ridgely
published in 1841 his _Annals of Annapolis_ (1649-1872). Rev. Ethan
Allen’s _Historical Notes of St. Ann’s Parish_ (1649-1857), appeared in
1857; and George Johnstone’s _History of Cecil County_ in 1881.—ED.]
[903] [Mr. Kennedy’s reply appeared in the _United States Catholic
Magazine_, and Mr. Michael Courtney Jenkins printed a rejoinder in the
same number.—ED.]
[904] [Mr. Gladstone was answered by Dr. Richard H. Clarke, in the
_Catholic World_, December, 1875, in a paper which was later issued as
a pamphlet, with the title, _Mr. Gladstone and Maryland Toleration_.
Mr. Gladstone had reissued his _Vaticanism_ essays with a preface,
styling the book, _Rome and the Newest Fashions in Religion_, in which
he reiterated his arguments.
It is perhaps largely owing to the deficiency of early personal
narratives bearing upon Maryland history and throwing light upon
character, that there is so much diversity of opinion regarding the
interpretation to be put on the charter as an instrument inculcating
toleration. The shades of dissent, too, are marked. Hildreth,
_History of the United States_, says, “There is not the least hint
of any toleration in religion not authorized by the law of England.”
Henry Cabot Lodge, _Short History of the English Colonies_, p. 96,
says, “There is no toleration about the Maryland charter.” Some
light regarding Calvert, on the side of doubt, may be gathered from
Gardiner’s _Prince Charles and the Spanish Marriage_.
In Baltimore’s controversy with Clayborne, the side of the latter
has been espoused by Mr. Streeter in his _Life and Colonial Times of
William Claiborne_, which he has left in manuscript, and of which an
abstract of the part relating to Clayborne’s Rebellion is given by Mr.
S. M. Allen in the _New England Historical and Genealogical Register_,
April, 1873. Mr. Streeter was of New England origin, a graduate of
Harvard (1831), and had removed to Richmond in 1835, and to Baltimore
the following year, where he had been one of the founders, and was
long the Recording Secretary of the Maryland Historical Society. He
contributed also in 1868 to its _Fund Publication_ (No. 2), _The First
Commander of Kent Island_,—an account of George Evelin, under whose
administration the island passed into Calvert’s control. This tract has
been reprinted in G. D. Scull’s _Evelyns in America_, privately printed
at Oxford (England), 1881. Streeter’s “Fall of the Susquehannocks,” a
chapter of Maryland’s Indian history, 1675, appeared in the _Historical
Magazine_, March, 1857, being an extract only from a voluminous
manuscript work by him on the Susquehannocks.—ED.]
[905] [Lewis Mayer published an account of its library, cabinets, and
gallery in 1854; and No. 1 of its _Fund Publications_ is Brantz Mayer’s
_History, Possessions, and Prospects of the Society_, 1867.—ED.]
* * * * * *
Transcriber’s note:
—Obvious errors were corrected.