At that time the continent lying between the Atlantic and the Pacific

was regarded as a narrow strip of land; and as late as 1651 it was

estimated that it was only ten days’ journey on foot from

the headwaters of the James to the Pacific.[439] In 1609 the country

was called Nova Britannia. It would seem, therefore, according to

present indications, that Smith was entitled to the credit given him

by Rich. At all events the importance of Smith’s work in New England

cannot be questioned. Smith himself was not backward in asserting

the value of his services, declaring in one place that he “brought

New England to the Subjection of the Kingdom of Great Britain.”[440]

After the publication of his map, Norumbega well-nigh disappeared from

the pages of travellers,[441] and a new series of observation of the

territory was begun by the authors of works like those which chronicled

the doings of the Leyden Adventurers in New England.

[Illustration]

* * * * *

EDITORIAL NOTES.

=A.= EARLIEST ENGLISH PUBLICATIONS ON AMERICA.—The backwardness of

the English in all that related to the extension of American discovery

is distinctly apparent in the comparatively few publications from

the London press in the sixteenth century which conduced to spread

intelligence of the New World on the land and incite rivalry on the

ocean. The following list will show this:—

=1509.= When Alexander Barclay put Sebastian Brant’s _Ship of Fools_

into English verse and published it in folio in London, he disclosed

one of the earliest references to the Spanish discoveries which the

English people could have read. This book is very rare; a copy brought

£120 at the Perkins sale in London in 1873,—_Carter-Brown Catalogue_,

p. 245. This edition has of late been reprinted in England, edited by

Jamieson.

=1511.=(?) A book _Of the newe Lādes_, printed about this time at

Antwerp, but in English, is thought to have been the earliest original

treatise in the English tongue which makes any mention of America. The

New World is supposed to be meant by “Armenica.” Harrisse, however,

assigns 1522 as its date,—_Bibl. Amer. Vet._ p. 196. There is a copy

in the British Museum.

=1519=, though put by some as early as 1510. _A new Interlude of the

iiij. Elements._ This has been already described in Mr. Deane’s chapter.

=1517.= Wynkyn de Worde printed Watson’s English prose translation of

Brant’s _Ship of Fools_.

A half century and more slipped away without the English press taking

heed, except in such chance notices as these, of what was so closely

engaging the attention of the rest of Europe. But in

=1553= appeared the earliest book produced in England chiefly devoted

to the American discoveries, and this was Richard Eden’s _Treatyse of

the newe India_, which he had translated from the Latin of the fifth

book of Sebastian Munster’s _Cosmographia_, pp. 1099 to 1113. See

_Carter-Brown Cat._ p. 171, and further in the chapter on the Cabots.

Munster was one of the most popular cosmographers of his day. He had

begun his work in 1532 by supplying a map by Apianus to Gyrnæus’s

_Novus Orbis_ of that date, which was not very creditable, being much

behind the times; and he made amends by trying to give the latest

information in an issue of Ptolemy, which he edited in 1540, to which

he supplied a woodcut map that did service in a variety of publications

for nearly all the rest of the century. It was one of the earliest

maps, in which interstices were left in the block for the insertion

of type for the names, and in this way it was made to accompany both

German and Latin texts. It was also used in Sylvanus’s Ptolemy, the

names being in red. Kohl, _Disc. of Maine_, p. 296; _Harvard Coll. Lib.

Bull._ i. 270.

Munster’s _Cosmographia_, to which he transferred this map, was first

published in German, according to Harrisse, _Bibl. Amer. Vet._, no.

258, quoting the _Labanoff Catalogue_, in 1541, and again in 1544, with

a new map. After this there were two German (1545 and 1550) and one

Latin (1550) edition, each published at Basle, and a French edition

(1552), all of which are generally noted, besides Eden’s version of

1552 (owned by Mr. Brevoort); cf. _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, 1865, p.

27, and an earlier one (1543), cited in Poggendorff’s _Biog.-lit.

Handwörterbuch_, ii. 234, which is not so generally recognized, if

indeed it exists at all. The statement is, however, enough to indicate

that Eden thus made a popular book the medium of his first presentation

to the English public.

[Illustration: TITLE OF EDEN’S MUNSTER.

The cut is taken from the _Carter-Brown Catalogue_. The Colophon reads:

“Thus endeth this fyfth boke of Sebastian Munster, of the lādes of Asia

the greater, and of the newefounde landes, and Ilandes. 1553.”]

=1555.= Richard Eden, who to his book-learning added the results

of converse with sailors, next published his _Decades of the Newe

Worlde, or West India_, derived in large part, as shown in Mr. Deane’s

chapter, from the Latin of Peter Martyr. This made to the English

public the first really collective presentation of the results of the

maritime enterprise of that time. (H. Stevens, _Bibl. Hist._ 1870,

no. 632; Field, _Indian Bibliog._ no. 484; _Carter-Brown Catalogue_,

p. 184, with fac-simile of title.) Among the supplemental matters was

a “Description of the two Viages made out of England into Guinea,”

in 1553-54, which were the earliest English voyages ever printed.

This 1555 edition, which fifty years ago was worth in good copies six

guineas (Rich’s _Catalogue_, 1832, no. 30), will now bring about £25.

The Editor has used the Harvard College and Mr. Charles Deane’s copies.

There was sold in the Brinley sale, no. 40, the 1533 edition of Peter

Martyr, which was the copy used by Eden in making this translation,

and it is enriched with his little marginal maps and annotations. See

Sabin’s _Dictionary_, i. 201, where it is said Bellero’s map, measuring

5 × 6½ inches, is found in some copies. The Lenox copy has a larger

map, 10½ × 7 inches, with a similar title.

=1559.= “A perticular Description of suche partes of America as are

by travaile founde out,” made the last chapter of a heavy folio, _The

Cosmographicalle Glasse_, which appeared in London, the work of a young

man, William Cunningham, twenty-eight years old, a doctor in physics

and astronomy. See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 214, where a fac-simile

of the author’s portrait as it appeared in the book is given.

=1563.= _The whole and true discouerie of Terra Florida_, as set forth

in English, following Ribault’s narrative, was published in London on

the 30th of May. The book is so scarce that the Lenox and Carter-Brown

Libraries have been content with manuscript copies from the volume in

the British Museum. This may possibly indicate that the destruction of

the edition followed upon much reading and thumbing.

=1568.= _The New found Worlde, or Antarctike ... travailed and written

in the French tong by that excellent learned man, Master Andrewe

Thevet, and now newly translated into English. Imprinted at London

for Thomas Hacket._ This is a translation of Thevet’s well-known but

untrustworthy book. See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 241; there is also

a copy in H. C. Murphy’s collection.

[Illustration: MUNSTER, 1532.]

[Illustration: MUNSTER, 1540.

This sketch-map needs the following key:—

1. India Superior.

2. Archipelagus 7448 Insularum.

3. Francisca.

4. C. Britonum.

5. Terra Florida.

6. Cortereali.

7. Hispaniola.

8. Cuba.

9. Iucatan.

10. Jamica.

11. Antillæ.

12. Dominica.

13. Zipangri.

14. Paria.

15. Regio Gigantum.

16. Fretum Magalini.

17. Insulæ Inforunatæ.

18. Oceanus Occidentalis.

19. Insulæ Hesperidum.

20. Insula Atlantica quam vocant Basilij et Americam.]

=1570.= Another English edition of Barclay’s version of the _Ship of

Fools_. The _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 243, gives the title and

portrait of Brant in fac-simile.

=1572.= Eden’s version of Munster again appeared under the title of _A

briefe Collection and Compendious Extract of Straunge and Memorable

Thinges, gathered out of the Cosmographeye of Sebastian Munster_. See

_Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 172.

=1574.= Eden’s _Briefe Collection_ was reissued. There was a copy in

the Heber sale, and one is now in the British Museum, according to

Sabin.

[Illustration: Title of Stultifera Nauis (1570)

[Stultifera Nauis,

qua omnium mortalium narratur stultitia, admodum

vtilis & necessaria ab omnibus ad suam salutem perlegenda,

è Latino sermone in nostrum vulgarem versa,& iam diligenter

impressa. An. Do. 1570.

The Ship of Fooles, wherin is shewed the folly

of all States, with diners other workes adioyned unto the same,

very profitable and fruitfull for all men.

Translated out of Latin into Englishe by Alexander

Barclay Priest.]]

[Illustration: AUTOGRAPH OF SIR HUMPHREY GILBERT.]

=1576.= In April appeared Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s _Discourse of a

Discoverie for a new passage to Cataia_, a Gothic-letter tract of

great rarity in these days. It is credited with giving a new impulse

to English explorations; and had exerted some influence in manuscript

copies before being printed. See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 258;

_Brinley Catalogue_, no. 31, Heber’s copy, which brought $255. It is

also in the Lenox Library; and this and the Carter-Brown copy have

the rare map which in the Catalogue of the latter collection is given

slightly reduced, and it is in part reproduced herewith. See Fox

Bourne’s _English Seamen_, chs. 5 and 7. Gilbert in this had undertaken

to prove, both from reasoning and report, that there was a northwest

passage, and that America was an island, and he recounts traditions of

its being sailed through. See Mr. Deane’s chapter on “The Cabots.”

[Illustration: PART OF GILBERT’S MAP, 1576.]

=1577.= Settle published in London his _True Reporte of the laste

Voyage into the west and northwest regions_, the author having

accompanied Frobisher on his voyage in 1577. Its rarity—for besides

the Grenville copy in the British Museum, that in the _Carter-Brown

Catalogue_, p. 266, where its title is given in fac-simile, is the only

one we have noted—may signify the eagerness there was to read it, with

a consequent use great enough to destroy the edition, though there

are said to have been two issues the same year. A fac-simile reprint

(fifty copies) has been privately made from the Carter-Brown copy; and

it is also reprinted in Brydges’s _Restituta_, 1814, vol. ii. See _N.

E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1869, p. 363,—a notice by John Russell

Bartlett.

=1577.= Richard Willes brought out in London, with some augmentation,

an edition of Eden’s Peter Martyr, under the new title of _The History

of Trauvayle_, a stout volume, which in the known copies has stood wear

better. Willes’s preface tells the story of Eden’s labors, and adds,

“Many of his Englysche woordes cannot be excused in my opinion for

smellyng to much of the Latine.”

It would seem that the arrangement was still mostly the labor of Eden,

who did not die till 1576. Willes, however, suppressed Eden’s preface

of 1555.

This edition has likewise much appreciated in value. Rich, in his 1832

_Catalogue_, no. 57, priced a fine copy at £4 4_s._; now one is worth

£20 or more. There are copies in Harvard College, Carter-Brown (no.

312), Charles Deane’s and Boston Athenæum Libraries. See also _Brinley

Catalogue_, no. 41; _Sunderland Catalogue_, no. 4180; Field, _Ind.

Bibl._, no. 485; _Huth Catalogue_, p. 922.

[Illustration]

=1577.= John Frampton translated and published, under the title of

_Joyfull Newes out of the New founde Worlde_, a book of the Seville

Physician, Nicholas de Monardes. See _Brinley Catalogue_, no. 46;

Stevens’s _Nuggets_, 1924; _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, no. 313.

=1578.= Thomas Churchyard’s _Prayse and Report of Maister Martyne

Forboisher’s Voyage to Meta Incognita_, London. Bohn’s _Lowndes_, p.

450, reports a copy in the British Museum.

=1578.= George Best published his _True Discourse of the late voyage of

discoverie for the finding of a passage to Cathaya by the North-weast,

under the Conduct of Martin Frobisher, generall_. This is also very

rare. See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, no. 319, which shows the two rare

maps, a portion of one of which is given in fac-simile in ch. iii. from

that in Collinson’s _Martin Frobisher_.

=1578.= Thomas Nicholas printed, under his initials only, an English

version of Gomara’s account of Cortes’ conquest of New Spain, called

_The Pleasant Historie of the Conquest of the Weast Indies_. Fine

copies are worth about £10. There are copies in the Boston Athenæum,

Lenox Library, etc. See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 275, for

fac-simile of title; Sabin’s _Dictionary_, vii. 311; W. C. Hazlitt’s

_Bibliog. Coll. and notes_, 2d ser. p. 265.

=1580.= A new edition of Frampton’s _Joyfull Newes_. This edition is

worth about £4. There is a copy in Harvard College Library. Rich,

_Catalogue_, 1832, no. 64.

=1580.= John Florio published a retranslation into English from

Ramusio’s Italian version of Cartier’s _Voyage to New France_ (1534),

which had appeared originally in French, but was not now apparently

accessible to Florio. _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, no. 331.

=1581.= T. Nicholas published an English translation, now very rare, of

Zarate’s account of the Conquest of Peru.

=1582.= Hakluyt began his active participation in furthering English

maritime exploration by his first publication, the little _Divers

Voyages_, dedicating it to Sir Philip Sidney; and in this he says: “I

marvaile not a little ... that we of England could never have the grace

to set fast footing in such fertill and temperate places as are left

as yet unpossessed.” Again he says: “In my public lectures I was the

first that produced and showed both the olde imperfectly composed and

the new lately reformed mappes, globes, and spheares, to the generall

contentment of my auditory.” See further in Mr. Deane’s chapter on “The

Cabots.” Cf. W. C. Hazlitt’s _Bibliog. Coll. and notes_, 1st ser. p.

101.

There is, unfortunately, no sufficiently extended account of Hakluyt,

and the most we know of him must be derived from his own publications.

The brief account in Anthony Wood’s _Athenæ Oxonienses_ is the source

of most of the notices. Mr. J. Payne Collier has added something in a

paper on “Richard Hakluyt and American Discovery” in the _Archæologia_,

xxxiii. 383; and Mr. Winter Jones in his Introduction to the reprint

of the _Divers Voyages_ has told about all that can be gleaned, and in

his Appendix he gives some papers before unprinted, including Hakluyt’s

will. The subject has had later treatment, with the advantage of some

recent information, in the Introduction to the _Westerne Planting_, by

Dr. Woods and Mr. Deane.

With the exception of the criticism of John Locke,—if he be the editor

of Churchill’s _Collection_,—who wished Hakluyt had condensed more,

and of Biddle, who accuses him of perversions in his account of the

Cabots (see Mr. Deane’s chapter), the general opinion of Hakluyt’s

labor has been very high. Locke’s explanatory catalogue of voyages,

which appeared in Churchill, is reprinted in Clarke’s _Maritime

Discovery_. Oldys in the _British Librarian_, p. 136, analyzes

Hakluyt’s books, and there is a list of them in Sabin’s _Dictionary_

and in the _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 448. An account of the set in

the Lenox Library is printed in Norton’s _Literary Gazette_, i. 384.

Of the _Divers Voyages_, perfect copies are excessively rare, and the

two maps are almost always wanting. The two British Museum copies have

them, but the Bodleian has only the Lok map, and the same is true

of the Carter-Brown copy (_Catalogue_, p. 290). The other copies in

America belong to Harvard College (imperfect), Charles Deane, and Henry

C. Murphy. Of the maps, that by Lok is given in reduced fac-simile in

the _Carter-Brown Catalogue_ (as also in chapter i. of the present

volume), and both are given full size in the reprint of the Hakluyt

Society.

=1583.= Captain J. Carleill’s little _Discourse upon the entended

Voyage to the hethermoste Partes of America_, a tract of a few leaves

only, in Gothic letter, was probably printed about this time with the

aim to induce emigration and the fixing of commercial advantages.

Hakluyt thought it of enough importance to include it in his third

volume seventeen years later. _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 292.

=1583.= Sir George Peckham’s _True Report of the late Discoveries_,

etc. See further on this tract on a preceding page.

=1583.= M. M. S. published at London a small tract giving a

translation of Las Casas’ story of the Spanish deeds in the New World.

_Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 293.

=1588.= What is called the second original work published in England

on the New World is Hariot’s _New Foundland of Virginia_, a small

quarto of twenty-three leaves, imprinted at London. Heber had a copy;

and Brunet, the first to describe it, took the title from Heber’s

Catalogue. There are copies in the Lenox, Huth (_Catalogue_, ii.

652), Grenville (British Museum) and the Bodleian libraries. Sabin,

_Dictionary_, viii. 30377, who says this, adds that there was a copy

sold surprisingly low at Dublin in 1873, escaping the attention of

collectors. It was reprinted at Frankfort in 1590. See chapter iv.

=1588.= Appeared an English version of the Latin account of Drake’s

voyage.

=1589.= Hakluyt gave out the first edition of his _Principall

Navigations_. Copies are at present worth from £5 to £10, according to

condition; and we have noted the following: Harvard College, Brinley

(no. 33), Carter-Brown (no. 384), Charles Deane, Long Island Historical

Society, Field (_Ind. Bibliog._ no. 631), Crowninshield (_Catalogue_,

no. 487), etc. The catalogues usually note the six suppressed leaves of

Drake’s voyage when present.

Hakluyt, at the end of his preface, speaks of “The comming out of a

very large and most exact terestriall Globe, collected and reformed

according to the newest, secretest, and latest discoveries, ...

composed by Mr. Emmerie Mollineaux, of Lambeth, a rare gentleman in his

profession.”

In place of this Molineaux map, there sometimes appears, at p. 597,

what Hakluyt calls “One of the best general mappes of the world,”

which is a recut plate of one in Ortelius’s Atlas; and in other copies

instead we find another edition of the same, which is also found in the

English translation of Linschoten. Sabin says he has sometimes found a

woodcut of Gilbert’s map substituted. The Ortelius map is reproduced in

chapter i. of the present volume.

=1591.= Job Hortop’s _Rare Travales of an Englishman_, published in

London. Bohn’s _Lowndes_, p. 1124. There is a copy in the British

Museum. Hortop was one of Ingram’s companions, and after being captured

and confined in Mexico, reached England after very many years’ absence.

=1595.= John Davis published his _Worlde’s Hydrographical

Descriptions_, which in parts reiterates the views of Gilbert’s

_Discourse_. The only copies known are in the Grenville Library

(British Museum) and Lenox Library, New York. It is reprinted in the

Hakluyt Society’s edition of _Davis’s Voyages_, p. 191, and in the 1812

edition of Hakluyt’s _Principall Navigations_.

=1596.= A third edition of Frampton’s _Joyfull Newes_. A fine copy is

worth about three guineas. See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, no. 497.

=1596.= Second edition of Nicholas’s translation of Gomara. _Brinley

Catalogue_, nos. 32 and 5309; Sabin, _Dictionary_, 27752; Field, _Ind.

Bibl._ no. 611; _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, no. 499.

[Illustration]

=1598.= Wolfe, of London, published an English translation, by William

Philip, of Linschoten’s _Discours of Voyages into y^e Easte and West

Indies, in foure Bookes_, with a dedication to Sir Julius Cæsar, Judge

of the High Court of Admiralty. The preface adds: “Which Booke being

commended by Maister Richard Hackluyt, a man that laboureth greatly

to advance our English Name and Nativity, the Printer thought good

to cause the same to bee translated into the English Tongue.” The

original became a very popular book on the Continent. The maps of

American interest are those of the World, of the Antilles, and of South

America. The description of America begins on p. 216. _Carter-Brown

Catalogue_, i. no. 527; _Crowninshield Catalogue_, no. 625; Rich

(1832), no. 84, prices a copy at £8 8_s._

[Illustration]

These are all, or nearly all, the publications brought out in English

and relating to America prior to the enlarged edition of Hakluyt’s

Collection, which was dedicated to Sir Robert Cecil, and of which the

third volume, bearing date 1600, was devoted to America. Compared

with the publications of the Continent for the same century, they are

strikingly fewer in number; and such as they are, it will be seen that

of the thirty-four separate issues enumerated above only fourteen are

of English origin, and of the whole number only twelve belong to the

first three quarters of the century.

[Illustration]

During this same century the literature of navigation took its origin.

The Continental nations had already preceded. It was not till 1528 that

the first sea-manual appeared in England, and no copy of it is now

known. This was a translation of the French _Le Routier de la Mer_,

the antetype of the later rutters. The English edition was called _The

Rutter of the Sea_, and other editions appeared in 1536, 1541, and 1560

(?); the second of these adding, “A rutter of the northe, compyled

by Rychard Proude.” None of these, however, recognized the American

discoveries.

In 1561, Eden, at the suggestion of the Arctic navigator, Stephen

Burrough (b. 1525, d. 1586), again tried to give some impulse

to English interest by his translation of Martin Cortes’ _Art

of Navigation_, which had appeared at Seville ten years before.

(_Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 151.) Cortes was the first to suggest a

magnetic pole. Frobisher, when he made his first voyage, fifteen years

later (1576), perhaps because Eden’s translation was out of print, took

with him a Spanish edition of Medina’s _Arte de Navegar_,—a work which

preceded Cortes’, but never became so popular in England.

In 1565 came a fifth edition of the _Rutter of the Sea_, and in 1573

William Bourne first issued his _Regiment of the Sea_, which long

remained the chief English book on navigation.[442]

Eden put forth, at what precise date is not known, but not later than

1576, _A very necessarie and profitable book concerning Navigation,

compiled in Latin by Joannes Taisnierus_, in which the translator

intimates that Cabot knew more of the ways of discovering longitude

than he had disclosed. See _Carter-Brown Catalogue_, p. 262. _Davis’s

Voyages_ (Hakluyt Society) gives the date 1579.

Such books, as the interest in America became more general, increased

rapidly, and I note them in chronological order.

=1577.= Second edition, _Regiments of the Sea_.

=1578.= Edward Hellowes published in London, in a small tract, a

translation, _A booke of the Invention of Navigation_ of Antonio de

Gaevara, Bishop of Mondonedo, originally printed at Valladolid in 1539.

=1578.= Second edition, Eden’s Cortes.

=1580.= Sixth edition of _The Rutter of the Sea_.

=1580.= Third edition, Eden’s Cortes.

=1581.= _The Arte of Navigation. By Pedro de Medina. Translated out of

the Spanish by John Frampton._ Medina’s _Arte de Navegar_ originally

appeared at Valladolid in 1545.

=1584.= Fourth edition, Eden’s Cortes. See _Brinley Catalogue_, no. 19,

for a copy which has a folding woodcut map of the New World, which is

usually wanting in later editions.

=1585.= Robert Norman, hydrographer, published his _Newe Attractive_,

with rules for the art of navigation annexed.

=1587.= Robert Tanner’s _Mirror for Mathematiques, ... a sure safety

for Saylers_, etc.

=1587.= Seventh edition of _The Rutter of the Sea_.

=1588.= The first marine atlas ever made appeared at Leyden in 1583-84,

and this year in London as _The Mariner’s Mirrour, ... first made by

Luke Wagenaer, of Enchuisen, and now fitted with necessarie additions

by Anthony Ashley_.

=1588.= Fifth edition, Eden’s Cortes.

=1589.= Thomas Blundeville’s _Brief Description of Universal Mappes and

Cardes, and of their Use, and also the Use of Ptolemy his tables_.

=1589.= A sixth edition of Eden’s version of Martin Cortes’ _Arte of

Navigation_ appeared. Good copies of this small black-letter quarto are

worth about seven guineas. It is known that Hakluyt about this time was

endeavoring with the aid of Drake to found in London a public lecture

for the purpose of advancing the art of navigation.

=1590.= Robert Norman translated from the Dutch _The Safeguard of

Saylers, or Great Rutter_. Edward Wright corrected and enlarged this in

1612. Norman was the inventor of the dipping-needle, in 1576.

=1590.= Thomas Hood’s _Use of the Jacob’s Staffe; also a dialogue

touching the use of the Crosse Staffe_. These were instruments for

the taking of latitude. The astrolabe, an instrument of remote

antiquity, had been adapted to sea-use by Martin Behaim; but it was

soon found that it did not adapt itself to the automatic movement of

the observer’s body in a rolling sea, and in 1514 the cross-staff was

invented, or at least was first described.

=1592.= A third edition of Bourne’s _Regiment of the Sea_, corrected by

Thomas Hood.

=1592.= Thomas Hood’s _Use of both the Globes, celestiall and

terrestriall_, written to accompany the Molineaux globes.

=1592.= Thomas Hood’s _Marriner’s Guide_.

=1594.= John Davis published his _Seaman’s Secrets, wherein is taught

the three kindes of Sayling,—Horizontall, Paradoxall, and Sayling upon

a great Circle_. He held up the example of the Spaniards: “For what

hath made the Spaniard to be so great a Monarch, the Commander of both

Indies, to abound in wealth and all Nature’s benefites, but only the

painefull industrie of his Subjects by Navigation.” No copy of this

first edition is known. The second edition, 1607, is in the British

Museum, and from this copy the tract is reprinted in _Davis’s Voyages_

(Hakluyt Society ed.).

=1594.= _M. Blundevile, his Exercises_, with instruction in the art of

navigation. This proved a popular instruction book.

=1594.= Robert Hues printed in London a Latin treatise on the Molineaux

globes, _Tractatus de Globis, et eorum usu_. This includes a chapter by

Thomas Hariot on the rhumbs, or the lines which so perplexingly cover

the old maps.

=1596.= Another edition of Hood’s corrected issue of Bourne’s _Regiment

of the Sea_.

=1596.= Second edition of Norman’s _Newe Attractive_, etc.

=1596.= John Blagrave’s _Necessary and Pleasaunt Solace and recreation

for Navigators.... Whereunto ... he has anexed another invention

expressing on one face the whole globe terrestrial, with the two great

English voyages lately performed round the world_. This last is a map

by Hondius, reproduced in Drake’s _World Encompassed_ (Hakluyt Soc.

ed.).

=1596.= Thomas Hood’s _Use of the mathematicall Instruments, the Crosse

Staffe differing from that in common use, and the Jacob’s Staffe_.

=1596.= Seventh edition of Eden’s version of Cortes.

=1597.= Second edition of _Blundevile, his Exercises_.

=1597.= William Barlow’s _Navigator’s Supply, containing many things of

principal importance belonging to navigation_. Largely on compasses.

=1598.= John Wolfe translated and printed _A treatyse ... for all

seafaringe men, by Mathias Sijverts Lakeman, alias Sofridus_.

=1599.= Simon Stevin’s _De Haven-vinding_ appeared at Leyden, and

Edward Wright brought it out at once in English, as _The Haven-Finding

Art_.

=1599.= Edward Wright published his _Certain Errors in Navigation,

detected and corrected_. Wright was born in 1560, was lecturer on

navigation for the East India Company, was the verifier and improver of

Mercator’s projection, and is thought to have been the author of the

Molineaux map.

It will be observed that of this list of thirty-three publications for

twenty-five years about one half is of foreign origin.

=B.= HAKLUYT’S “WESTERNE PLANTING” AND THE MAINE HISTORICAL

SOCIETY.—The history of this manuscript, so far as known, is as

follows:—

The family of Sir Peter Thomson (who died in 1770) possessed it,

from whom Lord Valentia secured it, and this collector indorsed upon

it “unpublished” and “extremely curious.” It subsequently is found

in the hands of Mr. Henry Stevens, who put it into a public sale in

London, May, 1854; and in the Catalogue (lot 474) it is called “a

most important unpublished manuscript, 63 pages, closely and neatly

written, in the original calf binding.” It brought £44, and passed into

the Collection of Sir Thomas Phillipps. (Stevens’s _Hist. and Geog.

Notes_, 1869, p. 20.) This gentleman began in 1837 to print privately

a catalogue of his library, then kept at Middle Hill, Worcestershire,

and continued the printing, sheet by sheet, and under no. 14097 this

manuscript appears as “A Hakluyt Discourse.” In 1859 Sir Thomas bought

Thirlestane House, Cheltenham, the seat of Lord Northwick, and hither

he removed his vast collections of manuscripts and books, where they

now are, in the possession of his heirs, Sir Thomas having died in

1872. They are open to inquirers under restrictions. See _N. E. Hist.

and Geneal. Reg._, 1873, p. 429.

The manuscript of the _Westerne Planting_ is not thought to be in

Hakluyt’s hand, though in a contemporary script; and the writing of it

by Hakluyt seems to have been in progress during the summer of 1584,

while its author was thirty-two years old. There is evidence that it

existed in four or five copies,—of which the only one known at this

day is the Phillipps copy,—one of which was for the queen, and all

were made with the view of recommending the planting of Norumbega.

In 1867 Dr. Woods was commissioned by the Governor of Maine to

procure in Europe material for the early history of the State, and

the first fruit was the engaging of Dr. Kohl in the work, which

subsequently assumed shape in his _Discovery of Maine_, and the second

the procurement of this Hakluyt manuscript. Dr. Woods was engaged in

preparing it for the press, when his health declined, and the labor was

completed by Mr. Charles Deane, the book being published by the Maine

Historical Society in 1877.

* * * * *

Under the auspices of this Society some important historical work has

been done. Dr. Kohl’s book is the most elaborate summary yet made

of the early explorations on our New England coast. The labors of

Dr. Woods have been the subject of consideration in Dr. E. A. Park’s

_Life and Character of Leonard Woods_, Andover, 1880, 52 pp., and in

Dr. C. C. Everett’s notice in _Me. Hist. Coll._, viii. 481, and in

_Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, xviii. 15. The late George Folsom opened

an important field of investigation in his _Catalogue of Original

Documents in the English Archives relating to the Early History of

Maine_, privately printed, New York, 1858, which covers the years

1601-1700, and is said to have been compiled for him by Mr. H. G.

Somerby. See _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._,1859, p. 262, and 1869, p.

481. Of the labors of William D. Williamson, the principal historian

of the State, there is due record in the _Historical Magazine_, xiii.

265, May, 1868, and in the _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, i. 90. The

Hon. William Willis, of whom there are accounts in the _Maine Hist.

Coll._, vii. 473, and in the _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1873,

p. 1, was for many years the president of the Society, and besides

furnishing many communications, he issued a bibliography of Maine in

_Norton’s Literary Letter_, no. 4, 1859, which was much enlarged in

the _Historical Magazine_, xvii. 145, March, 1870. In connection with

this subject the bibliography in Griffin’s _History of the Press in

Maine_, 1872, deserves notice. There is in the _Hist. Mag._, Jan.

1868, an account of the Maine Historical Society and the historical

investigations it has patronized.

A list of the charters and grants on the Maine coast is given in the

_Hist. Mag._, March, 1870, p. 154. See in this connection S. F. Haven’s

lecture in the _Mass. Hist. Soc. Lowell Lectures_.

[Illustration: DR. JOHN G. KOHL.

We are indebted for the photograph used by the engraver to Dr.

Kohl’s successor in the librarianship of the Public Library at

Bremen, Dr. Heinrich Bulthaupt. No name ranks higher than Kohl’s

in the investigations of our early North American geography. “From

my childhood,” he says, “I was highly interested in geographical

researches in connection with history.” Having gathered much material

on the early cartographical history of America in the archives and

libraries of Europe, he came to this country, and receiving an

appropriation from Congress to enable him to make copies of his maps

for the Government, he undertook that work, the results of which are

now in the State Department at Washington. All that he desired to do

was not provided for by the order of Congress, and he returned to

Europe disappointed in his hopes, but leaving behind him, besides

the collections in Washington, a memoir with maps on the discovery

of the western coast of America, which is now in the library of the

American Antiquarian Society. In Europe he annotated and published at

Munich in fac-simile the two oldest general maps of America, those

known as Ribero’s and Ferdinando Columbus’s, and a treatise on the

history of the Gulf Stream, as well as a condensed popular history of

the discovery of America. In 1868 he undertook, what proved to be his

chief contribution to American historical geography, his _Discovery of

Maine_. He did not feel that he had accomplished all in this that he

would; but it still remains the most important essay since Humboldt in

that peculiar field. See Charles Deane’s notice of Kohl in _Mass. Hist.

Soc. Proc._, Dec. 1878, and the memoir in the _Beilage zur Allgemeinen

Zeitung_, Augsburg, July 9, 1879.]

=C.= THE POPHAM COLONY.—It was unfortunate, as it was unnecessary,

that any theological color should have been given to the discussion

arising out of the claims made for this colony, since the merits of the

case concerned solely the historical significance of secular events,

upon which all were agreed in the main. The claim asserted by the

Maine Historical Society, or by those representing it, was this: That

the temporary settlement at Sabino, being made under the charter of

1606, was the first event to secure New England for the English crown,

and should therefore be deemed the beginning of the existence of its

colonies. The claim of those historical students who took issue was

this: That the granting in 1606 of a patent by the king to his subjects

concerned no further the question than that it simply formulated a

pre-existing claim, while the actual attempts at colonization by

Gosnold in 1602, whether authorized or not,—the latter alternative

having of late years been brought forward by Dr. De Costa,—were more

practically demonstrative of that claim, in accordance with the English

interpretation of rights in new countries, namely, actual possession.

Further, that the true historic beginning of New England was not in

the abortive attempts of Gosnold and Popham to effect a settlement,

however much, in connection with many other events, they helped in

preparing a way, but in the permanent colonization which was made at

Plymouth in 1620, which was the first founded upon family life, and

which under greater distress than befell either of the others, was

rendered permanent more by the spirit of religious independency, as

evinced by their Holland exile, than by the mercenary longing, which

was professedly the chief motive of the others. Strachey distinctly

says of the Popham Colony, that mining was “the main intended benefit

expected.”

It is susceptible of proof that the blood of the Pilgrims and of their

congeners runs through the veins of a large part of the population

of New England to-day. No genealogical tree has been produced which

connects our present life with a single one of the Sabino party.

How, then, was New England saved for the English race? The decisive

historical event is never those scattering forerunners which always

harbinger an epoch, but the fulfilment of the idea which comes in the

ripeness of time.

The controversy as it was waged was a reaction from the views with

which the Pilgrims had long been regarded for their devotion under

trial and for the pluck of their constancy in first making English

homes on this part of the continent. Maine writers like George Folsom

and William Willis had never questioned such established claims,

but had reasserted them. The leading spirit in this revocation of

judgment was Mr. John A. Poor, of Portland. This gentleman, having

done much to increase the material interests of his native State,

entered with pertinacity into a process of rendering, as he claimed,

the position of Maine in history more conspicuous. This required the

aggrandizement of the fame of Sir Ferdinando Gorges; and he began his

missionary work with a vindication of Gorges’ claims to be considered

the father of English colonization in America. It was no new idea,

for George Folsom had done Gorges justice in his _Discourse_ in 1846.

Mr. Poor’s lecture was printed, and was subsequently appended to the

_Popham Memorial_. To emphasize this claim, he secured the naming of

a new fort in Portland Harbor after Sir Ferdinando in 1860; and in

1862, when the General Government built a fortification on the old

peninsula of Sabino, his efforts caused it to be named Fort Popham,

and his zeal planned and directed a commemorative service in August of

that year on the spot, when a tablet recounting the claims of which

he was the champion was placed near its walls. The address which he

then delivered, which showed the intemperance, if not the perversity,

of an iconoclast, and which appeared with other papers and addresses

more or less pronounced in the same way in a _Popham Memorial_, opened

the controversy. See also _Historical Magazine_, Jan. 1863, and

Sept. 1866, and Mr. C. W. Tuttle’s account of Mr. Poor’s agency in a

“Memorial of J. A. Poor,” in the _N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, Oct.

1872. The committee charged with the preparation of the _Memorial_

unwisely omitted a counter speech of the late J. Wingate Thornton, on

“The Colonial Schemes of Popham and Gorges,” which was accordingly

printed in the _Congregational Quarterly_, April, 1863, and separately,

and is examined favorably by Abner C. Goodell in the _Essex Institute

Collections_, Aug. 1863, p. 175. A similar unfavorable estimate of

Popham’s colonists had been taken by R. H. Gardiner in the _Maine

Historical Collections_, ii. 269; v. 226.

For some years the spirit was kept alive by recurrent commemorations.

Mr. Edward E. Bourne (see memoir of him in _N. E. Hist and Geneal.

Reg._, 1874, p. 9, and _Me. Hist. Coll._, viii. 386) answered the

detractors in an address, “The Character of the Colony founded by

George Popham,” Portland, 1864. The statements of Poor and Bourne led

to a review by S. F. Haven in the _Amer. Antiq. Soc. Proc._, April

26, 1865, and in the _Hist. Mag._ (Dec. 1865, p. 358; March, July,

Sept., Nov., 1867; Feb. and May, 1869). There was a dropping fire on

both sides for some time. Meanwhile the address in 1865 by James W.

Patterson, on _The Responsibilities of the Founders of Republics_, led

to a controversy between William F. Poole attacking, and Rev. Edward

Ballard and Frederick Kidder defending, the colonists; and their

papers were printed together as _The Popham Colony: a Discussion of

its Historic Claims_, to which Mr. Poole appended a bibliography of

the subject up to 1866. Poole also gave his view of Gorges and the

colony in his edition of Johnson’s _Wonder Working Providence_, and in

the _North American Review_, Oct. 1868. At the celebration in 1871 Mr.

Charles Deane reviewed the erroneous conclusions presented at earlier

anniversaries, in a paper on “Early Voyages to New England, and their

Influence on Colonization,” which was printed in the _Boston Daily

Advertiser_, Sept. 2, 1871. A paper by R. K. Sewall on “Popham’s Town

of Fort St. George,” which contains a summary of the arguments and

events on the side of its historic importance, is given in the _Me.

Hist. Coll._, vii., accompanied by a map of the region. The latest

statement of the claim, apart from the review in the Preface to _The

Voyage to Sagadahoc_, referred to on an earlier page, is in General

Chamberlain’s _Maine_: _her Place in History_, which is too moderate

to provoke any criticism. Thus a reaction that at one time claimed the

necessity of rewriting history, has in the end engaged few advocates,

and is almost lost sight of.

=D.= CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH’S PUBLICATIONS.—The _Description_ is now a

rare book, worth with the genuine map, should one be offered, fifty

pounds or upwards. There is some bibliographical detail regarding it

in the _Memorial History of Boston_, i. 50, 52, 53. Latin and German

versions of it were included in De Bry, part x. Michael Sparke, the

London printer, issuing Higginson’s _New England’s Plantation_ in 1630,

appended this recommendation:—

“But whosoever desireth to know as much as yet can be discovered, I

advise them to buy Captaine John Smith’s booke of the description of

New England in folio, and reade from fol. 203 to the end; and there

let the reader expect to have full content.”

Smith’s letter (1618) to Bacon, upon New England, is in the _Hist.

Mag._, July, 1861, and the annexed autograph is taken from the original

in the Public Record office. See Sainsbury’s _Calendar of Colonial

Papers_, no. 42, p. 21; _Popham Memorial_, App. p. 104; Palfrey, _New

England_, i. 97.

[Illustration]

A little tract of Smith’s, _New England’s Trials_ [_i. e._ Attempts at

Settlements], needs to be taken in connection with the _Description_.

Of this tract, of eight pages, published in 1620, there is no copy

known in America, and Mr. Deane describes it and reprints it in the

_Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._ xii. 428, 449, from the Bodleian copy, which

differs in the names of the dedication from the British Museum copy.

In 1622 it was issued in a second edition, enlarged to fourteen pages,

which is also very rare, though copies are in the Deane Collection

and in that of John Carter-Brown, from the last of which a privately

printed reprint has been made. It was this text which Force used in his

_Tracts_, ii. See _Brinley Catalogue_, no. 363.

Smith had moved, April 12, 1621, in a meeting of the Virginia Company,

that its official sanction should be given to a compiled history of

“that country, from her first discovery to this day,” showing that

the purpose of his _Generall Historie_ was then in his mind. (Neill’s

_Virginia Company_, p. 210.) The first edition of it was issued in

1624, and in it he included, besides abstracts of various other

writings, substantially all his previous publications on America (see

the chapter on Virginia in the present volume), except his _True

Relation_, in the place of which he had put the _Map of Virginia_, a

tract covering the same transactions. When reissued in 1626 it was

from the same type, and again in 1627, and twice in 1632. An account

of the various editions in the Lenox Library, which differ only in the

front matter and plates, can be found in Norton’s _Literary Gazette_,

new ser. i. pp. 134 _a_, 218 _c_. Mr. Deane has printed a part of the

original prospectus. _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, ix. 454.

The best opportunity for studying the slight diversities of the

different issues of this book may be found in the Lenox Library, which

has ten copies, showing all the varieties. Among other copies, the

following are noted:—

1624., Charles Deane. A large paper dedication copy of this edition,

bound for Smith’s patron, the Duchess of Richmond and Lenox, was

bought, at the Brinley Sale in 1879, no. 364, for the Lenox Library,

$1,800. The Menzies and Barlow copies are also called large paper

ones. See _Griswold Catalogue_, no. 778; Field’s _Ind. Bibliog._ no.

1435. The _Huth Catalogue_, p. 1367, gives a copy of this edition in

the original rich binding, showing the arms of the Duke of Norfolk

quartered with those of his wife, the daughter of the Duchess of

Richmond and Lenox.

1626., Harvard College Library. Sparks’s Collection, now at Cornell

University, no. 2424.

1627., Prince Library in Boston Public Library. Massachusetts

Historical Society. See the _Crowninshield Catalogue_, no. 992.

1631., The _Huth Catalogue_, p. 1367, gives, perhaps by error, an

edition of this date. I have noted no other copy.

1632., Harvard College Library.

The two portraits of the Duchess of Richmond and of Matoaka are usually

wanting. See the note to chapter v. Average copies without the genuine

portraits, which in Rich’s day (1832) were worth five guineas, are now

valued at more than three times that sum. The portrait of Smith, which

is shown reduced on the map of New England already given, has been

similarly reproduced full size in the _Memorial History of Boston_, i.,

and is engraved in the Richmond edition of the _Generall Historie_, in

Bancroft, Drake’s _Boston_, Hillard’s _Life of Smith, N. E. Hist. and

Geneal. Reg._, Jan. 1858, etc.

The _Generall Historie_, in conjunction with the _True Travels_, was

carelessly reprinted at Richmond, in 1819, at the cost of the Rev. John

Holt Rice, D.D., who lost by the speculation. (_N. E. Hist. and Geneal.

Reg._, 1877, p. 114.) A large part appeared in Purchas’s _Pilgrims_,

iv. 1838. It is given entire in Pinkerton’s _Collections of Voyages_,

xiii.

It is the sixth book of this _Generall Historie_ which relates to

New England, and in this Smith supplements his own experience, and

brings the details down beyond the limits of this present chapter,

by borrowing from _Mourt’s Relation_ and reporting upon other

accounts, as he did in his still later publication, the tract called

_Advertisements for the Unexperienced Planters of New England_, which

brings the story down to 1630.

Dr. Palfrey has a note on the confidence to be reposed in Smith’s

books, in his _History of New England_, i. 89.

Smith was born in 1579 at Willoughby, as the parish records show.

(_Hist. Mag._, i. 313; _Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, ix. 451.) He died

June 21, 1631, signing his will the same day (_Ibid._ ix. 452), and

was buried in St. Sepulchre’s, London, where the inscription above

his grave is said to be now illegible. A committee of the American

Antiquarian Society was appointed in 1874 to see to its restoration,

but were prevented from acting by the demand of a fee for the privilege

from the vestry of the church. (_N. E. Hist. and Geneal. Reg._, 1874,

p. 222.) In Sparks’s _American Biography_ is a memoir of him by George

S. Hillard; another, by W. Gilmore Simms, was printed in 1846; and a

recent study of his life and writings has been made by C. D. Warner,

who says that the inscription, with the three (Turks’?) heads in St.

Sepulchre’s, long supposed to mark the grave of Smith, is proved to

commemorate some one who died in September, aged 66, while Smith died

June, 1631, aged 51. Stow’s _Survey of London_, 1633, gives the long

epitaph which could be read on the walls of the church previous to its

destruction in the great London fire in 1666. Cf. Deane in _Mass. Hist.

Soc. Proc._, Jan. 1867, p. 454.

[Illustration: NEW WORLD FROM THE LENOX GLOBE.]

Simon Passe, whose Latinized name we see on the engraving of Smith’s

map, was ten years in England, and engraved many of the chief people

of the time; and as he was his own draughtsman, it is probable the

portrait of Smith was drawn by Passe from life, though Robert Clerke is

credited with draughting the map.

=E.= EARLY GLOBES.—The Molineaux globe referred to in the text was

constructed at the instance of that great patron of navigation, William

Sanderson. (_Davis’s Voyages_, Introduction by Markham, pp. xii. 211.)

It is said to be the earliest ever made in England. (_Ibid._ p. lix.)

It is two feet in diameter, and was completed in 1592. (Asher’s _Henry

Hudson_, p. 274.) The oldest globe known antedates it more than a

century, and of those intervening which are known, the following, with

the prototype, deserve mention:—

1. Martin Behaim’s, 1492, preserved in the library at Nuremberg. It

presents an open ocean between Europe and Asia. The first meridian runs

through Madeira. There is a copy in fac-simile in the Bibliothèque

Nationale, at Paris. There have been engraved delineations of it

by Doppelmayr at Nuremberg in 1730; by Dr. Ghillany, in connection

with his _Geschichte des Seefahrers Ritter Martin Behaim_, 1853; by

Jomard in his _Monuments de la Géographie_, 1854-56, pl. 15. There are

sections and reductions in Cladera’s _Investigaciones Historicas_,

Madrid, 1794; in Lelewel’s _Moyen Age_; in the _Journal of the Royal

Geographical Society_, xviii.; in Kohl’s _Discovery of Maine_; in some

of the editions of Irving’s _Columbus_; in Bryant and Gay’s _United

States_, i. 103; and in Maury’s paper in _Harper’s Monthly_, xlii.

(February, 1871).

2. Acquired from a friend in Laon in 1860 by M. Leroux, of the

Administration de la Marine at Paris, and represents the geographical

knowledge current at Lisbon, 1486-87, according to D’Avezac, who gives

a projection of it in the _Bulletin de la Société de Géographie de

Paris_, 4th series, viii. (1860). It is dated 1493. The first meridian

runs through Madeira.

3. A small copper globe in the Lenox Library, in New York, which is

said to be the earliest globe to show the American coast, and its date

is fixed at about 1510-12, but by some as early as 1506-7.

[Illustration: FROM THE MOLINEAUX GLOBE.

This extract is from a tracing by Dr. De Costa. The legends on it are

marked as follows: A, Nova Francia; B, Canada; C, Norumbega; D, India;

E, Virginia, primum lustrata et Culta ab Anglis inpensis D. Gualteri de

Ralegh Equitis Aurati, etc., annuente Elizabetha sev. Angliæ Regina.

1. Hochelaga. 18. S. Cruz. 34. Claudia.

2. Mont Royal. 19. De Breton. 35. Rio Grande.

3. Estade. 20. Aredona. 36. De Lagus.

4. Stadin flu. 21. C. de Breton. 37. Montagna.

5. Saguinay. 22. S. Miguel. 38. B. S. Johan.

6. I. de Orleans. 23. C. Real. 39. Buena Vista.

7. R. Dulce. 24. C. S. Joan. 40. S. Samson.

8. R. S. Laurens. 25. Sinus Laureti. 41. Chesapicke.

9. S. Nicolas. 26. C. d’Esperance. 42. R. de Buelta.

10. C. Tienot. 27. G. de Chalue. 43. C. de Arenas.

11. Chasteaux. 28. Hunedo. 44. S. Christovall.

12. Belle Ysle. 29. I. S. Joan. 45. Chiapanak.

13. C. Blanco. 30. R. de la Pelaijo. 46. Trinitie Harbour.

14. Isle des Oiseaux. 31. R. Vista. 47. P. Hatorack.

15. C. de Bona Vista. 32. R. de Montagnas. 48. C. Hatoras.

16. The Bacailo. 33. Rio Honda. 49. Ye C. of Fear.

17. C. de Razo.]

It was bought in Paris about twenty-five years ago by R. M. Hunt, the

architect, and was given by him to Mr. Lenox. It is about five inches

in diameter. Dr. De Costa has described it and given a draught of

its geography in the _Mag. of Amer. Hist._, Sept. 1879. This paper,

translated by M. Gravier, appeared in the _Bulletin de la Société

normande de Géographie_, 1880. A projection of it is said to have

been made in the Coast Survey Bureau in 1869, at the instance of Mr.

Henry Stevens, and a reduction of this is given in the _Encyclopædia

Britannica_, 9th edition, x. 681, of which the Western Hemisphere is

herewith reproduced. The globe opens on the line of the equator, and

was probably used as a pyx. It may be said to be the oldest globe

showing any part of the New World.

4. Brought to light in a _Catalogue de Livres rares appartenant à M. H.

Tross, année 1881_, no. xiv. 4924, where a fac-simile by S. Pilinski is

given. The gores composing it are found in a copy of the _Cosmographiæ

Introductio_, supposed to have been printed at Lugduni, 1514. This is

the claim of the _Catalogue_; but if it belonged to the tract it could

hardly have been earlier than 1518. It is understood that the book has

been added to an American collection. The plate is styled _Universalis

Cosmographie Descriptio tam in solido quem_ [sic] _plano_, and is given

in twelve sections. The delineation of South America is marked “America

noviter reperta.” It is claimed that this gives this copperplate,

“essentiellement française,” the honor of being the earliest to bear

the name of America,—that credit having been claimed for the woodcut

map in Camer’s edition of Solinus, 1520. The manuscript delineation by

Leonardo da Vinci, also giving the name, and preserved at Windsor in

the Queen’s collection, probably antedates it.

5. Made by Johann Schoner at Bamberg in 1520, preserved in the library

at Nuremberg, and thought, until the discovery of the Lenox globe,

to be the earliest showing the discoveries in America. The northern

section is still broken up into islands large and small; but South

America is delineated with approximate correctness. Dr. Ghillany gave

a representation of the American hemisphere in the _Jahresbericht der

technischen Anstalten in Nürnberg für 1842_; also see his _Erdglobus

von Behaim vom Jahre 1492, und der des Joh. Schoner von 1520_,

Nürnberg, 1842, p. 18, two plates. Humboldt examines this Schoner

globe in his _Examen critique_, and in his Appendix to Ghillany’s

_Ritter Behaim_, where a reproduction is given. There are also

delineations or sections in Lelewel’s _Moyen Age_; in Kohl’s _Discovery

of Maine_; in Santarem’s _Atlas_; and in Maury’s paper in _Harper’s

Monthly_, February, 1871. Schoner published, in 1515, a _Terræ totius

descriptio_, without a map, of which there are copies in Harvard

College Library and the Carter-Brown Collection at Providence.

6. Preserved at Frankfort-on-the-Main; of unknown origin. It is figured

in Jomard’s _Monuments de la Géographie_. See also the _Journal of

the Royal Geographical Society_, xviii. 45. It resembles Schoner’s,

and Wieser ascribes it to that maker, and dates it 1515. It is 10½

inches in diameter, and by some the date is fixed at 1520.

7. Given by Duke Charles V. of Lorraine to the church at Nancy, and

opening in the middle, long used there as a pyx, is now preserved in

the Public Library in that town, and was described (with an engraving)

by M. Blau in the _Mémoires de la Société royale de Nancy_, in 1836,

and again in the _Compte-Rendu, Congrès des Américanistes_, 1877, p.

359, and from a photograph by Dr. DeCosta, in the _Magazine of American

History_, March, 1881. It makes North America the eastern part of Asia,

and transforms Norumbega into Anorombega. It is made of silver, gilt,

and is six inches in diameter.

8. Supposed to be of Spanish origin; preserved in the Bibliothèque

Nationale, at Paris, and formerly belonged to the brothers De Bure. It

bears a close resemblance to the Frankfort globe.

9. In the custody of the successors of Canon L’Ecuy of Prémontré. It is

without date, and D’Avezac fixed it before 1524; others put it about

1540. It is the first globe to show North America disconnected from

Asia. It is said to be now in the Bibliothèque Nationale, at Paris. Cf.

Raemdonck, _Les Sphères de Mercator_, p. 28.

10. What was thought to be the only copy known of one of Gerard

Mercator’s engraved globes was bought at the sale of M. Benoni-Verelst,

at Ghent, in May, 1868, by the Royal Library at Brussels. In 1875 it

was reproduced in twelve plane gores at Brussels, in folio, as a part

of _Sphère terrestre et sphère céleste de Gerard Mercator, éditées

à Louvain en 1541 et 1551_, and one of the sections is inscribed,

“EDEBAT GERARDUS MERCATOR RUPELMUNDANUS CUM PRIVILEGIO CES: MAIESTATIS

AD AN SEX LOVANII AN 1541.” Only two hundred copies of the fac-simile

were printed. There are copies in the Library of the State Department

at Washington, of Harvard College, and of the American Geographical

Society, New York. The outline of the eastern coast of America is

shown with tolerable accuracy, though there is no indication of the

discoveries of Cartier in the St. Lawrence Gulf and River, made a few

years earlier. In 1875 a second original was discovered in the Imperial

Court Library at Vienna; and a third is said to exist at Weimar.

11. Of copper, made apparently in Italy,—at Rome, or Venice,—by

Euphrosynus Ulpius in 1542, is fifteen and one half inches in

diameter, was bought in 1859 out of a collection of a dealer in

Spain by Buckingham Smith, and is now in the Cabinet of the New York

Historical Society. The first meridian runs through the Canaries, and

it shows the demarcation line of Pope Alexander VI. It is described in

the _Historical Magazine_, 1862, p. 302, and the American parts are

engraved in B. Smith’s _Inquiry into the Authenticity of Verrazano’s

Claims_, and Henry C. Murphy’s _Verrazzano_, p. 114. See Harrisse,

_Notes sur la Nouvelle France_, no. 291. The fullest description,

accompanied by engravings of it, is given by B. F. De Costa in the

_Magazine of American History_, January, 1879; and in his _Verrazano

the Explorer_, New York, 1881, p. 64.

[Illustration: SKETCH FROM THE FRANKFORT GLOBE.

The Legends of this Globe are these: 1. Parias. 2. C. San til. 3.

Isabelle. 4. Jamaica. 5. Spagnolla. 6. Lit. incognita [The Baccalaos

region]. The passage to the west by the Central America isthmus will be

observed.]

Mr. C. H. Coote, in his paper on “Globes” in the new edition of the

_Encyclopædia Britannica_, x. 680, mentions two other globes of the

sixteenth century, which may antedate that of Molineaux, both by A.

F. van Langren,—one in the Bibliothèque Nationale at Paris, and the

other, discovered in 1855, in the Bibliothèque de Grenoble.

The globe-makers immediately succeeding Molineaux were W. J. Blaeu

(1571-1638) and his son John Blaeu, and their work is rare at this day.

Mr. P. J. H. Baudet, in his _Leven en werken van W. J. Blaeu_, Utrecht,

1871, reports finding but two pair of his (Blaeu’s) globes (terrestrial

and celestial) in Holland. His first editions bore date 1599, but he

constantly corrected the copper plates, from which he struck the gores.

Muller, of Amsterdam, offered a pair, in 1877, for five hundred Dutch

florins, and in his _Books on America_, iii. 164, another at seven

hundred and fifty florins. (_Catalogue_, 1877, no. 329.) A pair, dated

1606, was in the Stevens sale, 1881. _Hist. Coll._, i., no. 1335.

I find no trace of the globe of Hondius, 1597, which gives the American

discoveries up to that date. See _Davis’s Voyages_ (Hakluyt Society),

p. 351. Hondius and Langeren were rivals.

[Illustration: SKETCH FROM THE MOLINEAUX MAP.

The Legends are as follows:—

1. This land was discovered by John and Sebastian Cabot for Kinge

Henry y^e 7, 1497.

2. Bacalaos.

3. C. Bonavista.

4. C. Raso.

5. C. Britton.

6. I. Sables.

7. I. S. John.

8. Claudia.

9. Comokee.

10. C. Chesepick.

11. Hotorast.

12. La Bermudas.

13. Bahama.

14. La Florida.

15. The Gulfe of Mexico.

16. Virginia.

17. The lacke of Tadenac, the bounds whereof are unknowne.

18. Canada.

19. Hochelague.]

=F.= MOLINEAUX MAP, 1600.—Emeric Molineaux, the alleged maker of this

map, belonged to Lambeth, “a rare gentleman in his profession, being

therein for divers years greatly supported by the purse and liberality

of the worshipful merchant, Mr. William Sanderson.” Captain Markham

(_Davis’s Voyages_, Hakluyt Society, London, 1880, pp. xxxiii, lxi,

also p. lxxxviii) is of the opinion that the true author is Edward

Wright, the mathematician, who perfected and rendered practicable what

we know to-day as Mercator’s projection,—first demonstrating it in his

Certain Errors in Navigation Detected, 1599, and first introducing its

formulæ accurately in the 1600 map. Hakluyt had spoken of the globe

by Molineaux in his 1589 edition, but it was not got ready in time

for his use. The map followed the globe, but was not issued till about

1600, the discoveries of Barentz in 1596 being the last indicated on

it. It measures 16½ × 25 inches. Quaritch in 1875 advanced the

theory that the globe of Molineaux was referred to in Shakespeare’s

_Twelfth Night_ (act iii. sc. 2), as the “new map.” (Quaritch’s 1879

_Catalogue_, no. 321, book no. 11919),—a theory made applicable to the

map and sustained by C. H. Coote in 1878, in _Shakespeare’s “new map”

in Twelfth Night_ (also in _Transactions_ of the New Shakspere Society,

1877-79, i. 88-100), and reasserted in the Hakluyt Society’s edition

of _Davis’s Voyages_, p. lxxxv. Henry Stevens (_Hist. Coll._ i. 200),

however, is inclined to refer Shakespeare’s reference (“the new map

with the augmentation of the Indies”) to the “curious little round-face

shaped map” in Wytfliet’s _Ptolemæum Augmentum_, 1597.

The Molineaux-Wright map has gained reputation from Hallam’s reference

to it in his _Literature of Europe_ as “the best map of the sixteenth

century.” It is now accessible in the autotype reproduction which was

made by Mr. Quaritch from the Grenville copy of Hakluyt’s _Principall

Navigations_ in the British Museum, and which accompanies the Hakluyt

Society’s edition of _Davis’s Voyages_. There are nine copies of the

map known, as follows: 1. King’s Library. 2. Grenville Library. 3.

Cracherode Copy. (These three are in the British Museum.) 4. Admiralty

Office. 5. Lenox Library, New York. 6. University of Cambridge. 7.

Christie Miller’s Collection. 8. Middle Temple. 9. A copy in Quaritch’s

Catalogue, 1881, no. 340, title-number, 6235, which had previously

appeared in the Stevens sale, _Hist. Collections_, i. 199. Quaritch

held the Hakluyt (3 vols.) with this genuine map at £156, and it is

said no other copy had been sold since the Bright sale.

It may be noted that Blundeville, who in his _Exercises_, pp. 204-42,

describes the Mercator and Molineaux globes, also, pp. 245-78, gives a

long account of a mappamundi by Peter Plancius, dated 1592, of which

Linschoten, in 1594, gives a reduction.

=G.= MODERN COLLECTIONS OF EARLY MAPS.—The collections of

reproductions of the older maps, showing portions of the American

coast, and representing what may be termed the beginnings of modern

cartography, are the following:—

JOMARD, E. F. _Les Monuments de la Géographie._ Paris, 1866. The death

of Jomard in 1862 (see Memoir by M. de la Roquette, in _Bulletin de

la Soc. Géog._ February, 1863, or 5th ser. v. 81, with a portrait;

Cortambert’s _Vie et Œuvres de Jomard_, Paris, 1868, 20 pages; and

_Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc._, iv. 232, vi. 334) prevented the completion

by him of the text which he intended should accompany the plates. M.

D’Avezac’s intention to supply it was likewise stayed by his death, in

1875. It proved, however, that Jomard had left behind what he had meant

for an introduction to the text; and this was printed in a pamphlet

at Paris in 1879, as _Introduction à l’Atlas des Monuments de la

Géographie_, edited by E. Cortambert. It is a succinct account of the

progress of cartography before the times of Mercator and Ortelius. The

atlas contains five maps, of great interest in connection with American

discovery:—

The Frankfort Globe, _circa_ 1520.

Juan de la Cosa’s map, 1500.

The Cabot map of 1544.

A French map, made for Henri II.

Behaim’s Globe, 1492.

These reproductions are of the size of the original. Good copies are

worth £10 10_s._

SANTAREM, VISCONDE DE. _Atlas Composé de Cartes des XIV^e XV^e XVI^e

et XVII^e siècles_, Paris. 1841-53. This was published at the charge

of the Portuguese Government, and is the most extensive of modern

fac-similes. Copies, which are rarely found complete, owing to its

irregular publication over a long period, are worth from $175 to $200.

A list of the maps in it is given in Leclerc, _Bibliotheca Americana_,

1878, no. 529; and of them the following are of interest to students of

American history:—

51. Mappemonde de Ruysch. This appeared in the Ptolemy of 1508 at Rome,

the earliest engraved map of America.

52. Globe of Schoner, and the map in Camer’s edition of Solinus, each

of 1520.

53. Mappemonde par F. Roselli, Florence, 1532, and the maps of

Sebastian Munster, 1544, and Vadianus, 1546.

The atlas should be accompanied by _Essai sur l’histoire de la

Cosmographie et de la Cartographie pendant le Moyen Age, et sur les

progrès de la Géographie après les grandes découvertes du XV^e siècle_.

3 vols. Paris. 1849-52.

KUNSTMANN, F. _Entdeckung Amerikas nach den ältesten Quellen

geschichtlich dargestellt._ Munich, 1859. This was published under

the auspices of the Royal Bavarian Academy of Sciences, and is

accompanied by a large atlas, giving fac-similes of the principal

Spanish and Portuguese maps of the sixteenth century, including one of

the California coast, and that of the east coast of North America, by

Thomas Hood, 1592. Copies are worth from $15 to $20.

LELEWEL, J. _Géographie du Moyen Age étudiée._ Bruxelles. 1852. 3

vols. 8º. With a small folio atlas, of thirty-five plates, containing

fifty-two maps. The text is useful; but, as a rule, the maps are on too

small a scale for easy study.

A series of photographic reproductions of early maps is now appearing

at Venice, under the title of _Raccolta di Mappamondi e Carte nautiche

del XIII al XVI secolo_. There are two which have a particular interest

in connection with the earliest explorations in America; namely,—

16. _Carta da navigare._ Attributed to ALBERTO CANTINO, supposed to

be A.D. 1501-03, and to illustrate the third voyage of Columbus. The

original is in the Bibl. Estense at Modena. [Not yet published.]

17. AGNESE, BATTISTA. _Fac-simile delle Carte nautiche dell’ anno

1554, illustrate da Teobaldo Fischer._ Venezia. 1881.

The editor, Fischer, is Professor of Geography at Kiel. The original is

in the Bibliotheca Marciana, at Venice. The sheets which throw light

upon the historical geography of America are these:—

XVII. 4. North America northward to the Penobscot and the Gulf of

California; and the west coast of South America to 15° south; then

blank, till the region of Magellan’s Straits is reached.

XVII. 5. North America, east coast from Labrador south; Central

America; South America, all of east coast, and west coast, as in XVII.

4.

XVII. 33. The World,—the American continent much as in XVII. 4 and 5.

We note the following other maps of Agnese:—

_a._ Portolano in the British Museum, bearing date 1536. _Index to MSS.

in British Museum_, 19,927. If this is the one Kohl (_Discovery of

Maine_, p. 293) refers to as no. 5,463, MS. Department British Museum,

it is signed and dated by the author.

_b._ Portolano, dated 1536, in the royal library at Dresden, of ten

plates,—one being the World, the western half of which, showing

America, is given reduced by Kohl, p. 292. It resembles XVII. 33,

above, but is not so well advanced, and retains a trace of Verrazano’s

Sea, which makes New England an isthmus. It wants the California

peninsula, a knowledge of whose discovery had hardly yet reached Venice.

_c._ Portolano, in the Bodleian Library, Oxford; thought by Kohl,

who gives a sketch (pl. xv. c), to be the work of Agnese, since it

closely resembles, in its delineations of the American continent, that

Venetian’s notions. This, perhaps, is earlier than the previous map;

for it puts a strait leading to the Western sea, where Cartier had just

before supposed he had found such in the St. Lawrence.

_d._ Map in the archives of the Duke of Coburg-Gotha, marked “Baptista

Agnes fecit, Venetiis, 1543, die 18 Febr.” Kohl (pl. xvii. 3) gives

from it a draft of the eastern coast of the United States.

_e._ Map, like _d_, in the Huth Library at London.

_f._ Portolano in the Royal Library, Dresden. It shows California.

Kohl, p. 294.

_g._ Portolano in the British Museum, dated 1564. _Index to MSS._

25,442.

Kohl says (p. 293) there are other MS. maps of Agnese in London, Paris,

Gotha, and Dresden, not here enumerated.

A few other books, less extensive and more accessible, deserve

attention in connection with the study of comparative early American

cartography.

HENRY STEVENS. _History and Geographical Notes of the Early Discoveries

in America, 1453-1530_, New Haven, 1869, with five folding plates of

photographic fac-similes of sixteen of the most important maps.

DR. J. G. KOHL. _Discovery of Maine_ (_Documentary History of Maine_,

1), with reduced sketches, not in fac-simile, of many early charts of

our eastern seaboard.

CHARLES P. DALY. _Early History of Cartography, or what we know of

Maps and Map-making before the time of Mercator_,—being his annual

address, 1879, before the American Geographical Society. The maps are

unfortunately on a very much reduced scale.

* * * * *

NOTE.—Since this chapter was completed Henry Harrisse’s _Jean et

Sébastien Cabot_, Paris, 1882, has given us the fullest account of

Agnese’s cartographical labors, with much other useful information

about the maps from 1497 to 1550; and George Bancroft (_Magazine of

American History_, 1883, pp. 459, 460), in defence of his latest

revision, has controverted Dr. De Costa’s statement (Ibid., 1883, p.

300), that Gosnold had no permission from Ralegh, and has set forth his

reasons for believing that Waymouth ascended the George’s River. De

Costa replied to Bancroft in the _Mag. of Amer. Hist._, Aug., 1883, p.

143.

Narrative and Critical History of America, Vol. 3 (of 8) English Explorations and Settlements in North America 1497-1689 · 第 8 / 24 章