Among other familiar Americanisms may be mentioned the following:—

An American who is interested in a narrative or statement will say, “Is

that so?” or simply “So!” The expression “Possible!” is sometimes, but

not often, heard. Dickens misunderstood this exclamation as equivalent

to “It is possible, but does not concern me;” whereas, in reality, it is

equivalent to the expression, “Is it possible?” I have occasionally heard

the exclamation “Do tell!” but it is less frequently heard now than of

yore.

The word “right” is more frequently used than in England, and is used

also in senses different from those understood in our English usage of

the word. Thus, the American will say “right here” and “right there,”

where an Englishman would say “just here” or “just there,” or simply,

“here” or “there.” Americans say “right away,” where we say “directly.”

On the other hand, I am inclined to think that the English expression

“right well,” for “very well,” is not commonly used in America.

Americans say “yes, sir,” and “no, sir,” with a sense different from that

with which the words are used in England; but they mark the difference

of sense by a difference of intonation. Thus, if a question is asked to

which the reply in England would be simply “yes” or “no” (or, according

to the rank or station of the querist, “yes, sir,” or “no, sir,”), the

American reply would be “yes, sir,” or “no, sir,” intonated as with us in

England. But if the reply is intended to be emphatic, then the intonation

is such as to throw the emphasis on the word “sir”—the reply is “yes,

_sir_” or “no, _sir_.” In passing, I may note that I have never heard an

American waiter reply “yessir,” as our English waiters often do.

The American use of the word “quit” is peculiar. They do not limit the

word, as we do, to the signification “take leave”—in fact, I have never

heard an American use the word in that sense. They generally use it as

equivalent to “leave off” or “stop.” (In passing, one may notice as

rather strange the circumstance that the word “quit,” which properly

means “to go away from,” and the word “stop,” which means to “stay,”

should both have come to be used as signifying to “leave off.”) Thus,

Americans say “quit fooling” for “leave off playing the fool,” “quit

singing,” “quit laughing,” and so forth.

To English ears an American use of the word “some” sounds strange—viz.,

as an adverb. An American will say, “I think some of buying a new house,”

or the like, for “I have some idea of buying,” etc. I have indeed heard

the usage defended as perfectly correct, though assuredly there is not an

instance in all the wide range of English literature which will justify

it.

So also, many Americans defend as good English the use of the word “good”

in such phrases as the following:—“I have written that note good,” for

“well;” “it will make you feel good,” for “it will do you good;” and in

other ways, all equally incorrect. Of course, there are instances in

which adjectives are allowed by custom to be used as adverbs, as, for

instance, “right” for “rightly,” etc.; but there can be no reason for

substituting the adjective “good” in place of the adverb “well,” which

is as short a word, and at least equally euphonious. The use of “real”

for “really,” as “real angry,” “real nice,” is, of course, grammatically

indefensible.

The word “sure” is often used for “surely” in a somewhat singular way, as

in the following sentence from “Sketches beyond the Sea,” in which Mr.

Wilkie is supposed to be quoting a remark made by an English policeman:

“If policemen went to shooting in this country, there would be some

hanging, sure; and not wholly among the classes that would be shot at,

either.” (In passing, note that the word “either” is never pronounced

_eyether_ in America, but always _eether_, whereas in England we seem to

use either pronunciation indifferently.)

An American seldom uses the word “stout” to signify “fat,” saying

generally “fleshy.” Again, for our English word “hearty,” signifying

“in very good health,” an American will sometimes employ the singularly

inappropriate word “rugged.” (It corresponds pretty nearly with our word

“rude”—equally inappropriate—in the expression “rude health.”)

The use of the word “elegant” for “fine” strikes English ears as strange.

For instance, if you say to an American, “This is a fine morning,” he is

likely to reply, “It _is_; an elegant morning,” or perhaps oftener by

using simply the word “elegant.” It is not a pleasing use of the word.

There are some Americanisms which seem more than defensible—in fact,

grammatically more correct than our English usage. Thus, we seldom hear

in America the redundant word “got” in such expressions as “I have

got,” etc., etc. Where the word would not be redundant, it is generally

replaced by the more euphonious word “gotten,” now scarcely ever heard in

England. Yet again, we often hear in America such expressions as “I shall

get me a new book,” “I have gotten me a dress,” “I must buy me that,” and

the like. This use of “me” for “myself” is good old English, at any rate.

I have been struck by the circumstance that neither the conventional,

but generally very absurd, American of our English novelists, nor the

conventional, but at least equally absurd, Englishman of American

novelists, is made to employ the more delicate Americanisms or

Anglicisms. We generally find the American “guessing” or “calculating,”

if not even more coarsely Yankee, like Reade’s Joshua Fullalove; while

the Englishman of American novels is almost always very coarsely

British, even if he is not represented as using what Americans persist

in regarding as the true “Henglish haccent.” Where an American is less

coarsely drawn, as Trollope’s “American Senator,” he uses expressions

which no American ever uses, and none of those Americanisms which, while

more delicate, are in reality more characteristic, because they are

common, all Americans using them. And in like manner, when an American

writer introduces an Englishman of the more natural sort, he never makes

him speak as an Englishman would speak; before half a dozen sentences

have been uttered, he uses some expression which is purely American.

Thus, no Englishman ever uses, and an American may be recognized at once

by using, such expressions as “I know it,” or “That’s so,” for “It is

true;” by saying “Why, certainly,” for “Certainly;” and so forth. There

are many of these slight but characteristic peculiarities of American and

English English.—_“Knowledge” Library._

The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, April 1884, No. 7 · 第 50 / 113 题